This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/119,930 filed Feb. 24, 2015 the full disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
Nucleic acid sequencing technology has experienced rapid and massive advances over recent years. As compared to gel based separation methods where nested sets of terminated sequence extension products were interpreted visually by scientists, today's sequencing technologies produce enormous amounts of sequence data, allow illumination of never before sequenced genomes and genome regions, and provide throughput and costs that allow the widespread adoption of sequencing into routine biological research and diagnostics.
Droplet-based microfluidic techniques are becoming a popular method of preparing molecules for sequencing due to massive high-throughput, low reagent cost, and ease of preparation. However, droplet chemistry generates a complex mixture of chemicals and biological products that can impact the outcome of downstream applications. Therefore, there exists a need for improved methods of purifying molecules from droplets.
An aspect of the disclosure provides a method for recovering target molecules from a plurality of droplets, comprising: a) providing a plurality of droplets having contents that comprise a plurality of target molecules; b) releasing the contents from the plurality of droplets to provide released target molecules; c) contacting the released target molecules with one or more supports, wherein the one or more supports bind the released target molecules to provide bound target molecules, and wherein the one or more supports comprises at least one component responsive to a magnetic force; and d) applying the magnetic force to the one or more supports.
In some cases, releasing the contents from the plurality of droplets to provide released target molecules further comprises destabilizing the plurality of droplets, thereby releasing the contents from the plurality of droplets. In some cases, the plurality of droplets comprise droplets in an emulsion and releasing the contents from the plurality of droplets to provide released target molecules further comprises contacting the emulsion with a destabilization agent that destabilizes the emulsion, thereby releasing the contents from the plurality of droplets. In some cases, the destabilization agent comprises perfluorooctanol.
In some cases, releasing the contents from the plurality of droplets to provide released target molecules further comprises releasing the contents from the plurality of droplets into a pooled mixture, wherein the pooled mixture comprises the released target molecules.
In some cases, the contacting step further comprises contacting the released molecules with the one or more supports by providing the one or more supports to the pooled mixture. In some cases, the contacting step further comprises contacting the released target molecules with the one or more supports in the presence of a chaotrope that aids in the one or more supports binding the released target molecules. In some cases, the chaotrope comprises guanadine thiocyanate or guanidine hydrochloride.
In some cases, the method provides for, after applying the magnetic force, releasing the bound target molecules from the one or more supports to provide re-released target molecules. In some cases, releasing is completed with the aid of an elution agent. The elution agent may comprise one or more of the following, without limitation: water, Tris buffer, phosphate buffer, and sodium hydroxide. Moreover, in some cases, prior to releasing the bound target molecules from the one or more supports, the method further comprises washing the one or more supports in one or more wash cycles by contacting the one or more supports with a washing agent. In some cases, the washing agent comprises ethanol, isopropanol and/or acetone. In some cases, the method comprises, after releasing the bound target molecules from the one or more supports, subjecting the re-released target molecules to a solid phase reversible immobilization process.
In some cases, the target molecules comprise target nucleic acid molecules. In some cases, the method further comprises, after the contacting step, determining sequences of the target nucleic acid molecules. In some cases, the method comprises, after the contacting step, appending one or more additional nucleotides to the target nucleic acid molecules to provide larger target nucleic acid molecules. In some cases, the method further comprises determining sequences of the larger target nucleic acid molecules.
In some cases, the target molecules comprise one or more of a small molecule, a protein, or a peptide.
In some cases, the at least one component comprises a magnetic particle.
In some instances, the one or more supports are functionalized with a silanol that aids in the one or more supports binding the target molecules. In some cases, the one or more supports are functionalized with a carboxylate that aids in the one or more supports binding the target molecules.
Further, the contents of the plurality of droplets may comprise one or more nucleic acid molecules. The contents may further comprise a polymerase. The contents may further comprise a primer. In some cases, the primer comprises a barcode sequence. Further, the primer may comprise a random N-mer.
In some cases, the contents of the plurality of droplets further comprise one or more polymeric species. The polymeric species may comprise polyacrylamide. The polyacrylamide may comprise a linear polyacrylamide. In some cases, the polyacrylamide may comprise agarose. In some instances, the contents of the plurality of droplets may further comprise a reducing agent.
In some cases, the plurality of droplets comprises aqueous droplets. Further, the plurality of droplets may comprise at least about 1,000 droplets, at least about 10,000 droplets, at least about 100,000 droplets, at least about 1,000,000 droplets or at least about 10,000,000 droplets.
In some aspects, the disclosure provides a method for purifying a target molecule, comprising: a) in a vessel, providing a support to a liquid mixture comprising contents of a destabilized droplet that comprise a target molecule, wherein the support binds the target molecule to provide a bound target molecule; b) immobilizing the support at a first location of the vessel, thereby separating the support from the liquid mixture; c) removing the liquid mixture from the vessel; d) providing a suspension fluid to the vessel, thereby suspending the support in the suspension fluid; and e) immobilizing the support at a second location of the vessel, thereby separating the support from the suspension fluid, wherein the second location of the vessel is different than the first location of the vessel.
In some cases, in a), the liquid mixture further comprises a chaotrope that aids in the support binding the target molecule. The chaotrope may comprise guanadine thiocyanate or guanidine hydrochloride. In some cases, in a), the liquid mixture further comprises a polymeric species. The polymeric species may comprise polyacrylamide. Furthermore, the polyacrylamide may comprise a linear polyacrylamide. In some cases, the polymeric species may comprise agarose.
In some cases, in a), the droplet is an aqueous droplet. Further, in some cases, in a), the liquid mixture further comprises a destabilization agent capable of destabilizing an emulsion. The destabilization agent may comprise PFO. Moreover, in some cases, in a), the liquid mixture further comprises a primer. The primer may comprise a barcode sequence. In some cases, the primer comprises a random N-mer. Furthermore, in a), the liquid mixture may further comprise a reducing agent.
In some cases, the immobilizing step further comprises magnetically immobilizing the support at the first location of the vessel. In some examples, the removing step further comprises removing the liquid mixture from the vessel via suction. In some cases, the removing step further comprises removing the liquid mixture from the vessel via decanting. In some cases, in d), the suspension fluid comprises ethanol, isopropanol or acetone.
In some cases, the second immobilizing step further comprises magnetically immobilizing the support at the second location of the vessel.
In some cases, the method further comprises, after e), releasing the bound target molecule from the support, to provide a released target molecule. In some cases, releasing is completed with the aid of an elution agent. The elution agent may comprise one or more of the following, without limitation: water, Tris buffer, phosphate buffer, and sodium hydroxide.
In some cases, prior to releasing the bound target molecule from the support, the method can further comprise washing the support in one or more wash cycles by contacting the support with a washing agent. The washing agent may comprise one or more of the following, without limitation: ethanol, isopropanol, and acetone.
In some cases, after releasing the bound target molecule from the support, the method can further comprise subjecting the released target molecule to a solid phase reversible immobilization process. In some cases, the target molecule comprises a target nucleic acid molecule. Furthermore, after e), the method can further comprise determining a sequence of the target nucleic acid molecule. In some cases, after e), the method may further comprise appending one or more additional nucleotides to the target nucleic acid molecule to provide a larger target nucleic acid molecule. In some cases, the method may further comprise determining a sequence of the larger target nucleic acid molecule. The target molecule may comprise a small molecule, a protein, a peptide.
In some cases, the support comprises a magnetic material. In some cases, the support comprises a particle. Furthermore, the support may be functionalized with a silanol that aids the support in binding the target molecule. In some cases, the support is functionalized with a carboxylate that aids the support in binding the target molecule.
In some cases, the vessel may be a tube, a well, a dish and/or a container.
Another aspect of the disclosure provides a method for purifying a target molecule, comprising: a) in a vessel, providing a liquid mixture comprising: a target molecule; a support configured to bind the target molecule; a fluorinated oil; and a chaotrope; b) binding the target molecule to the support to provide a bound target molecule, wherein the chaotrope aids in binding the target molecule to the support; and c) separating the support from the liquid mixture under conditions that immobilize the support to a surface of the vessel.
In some cases, the fluorinated oil comprises a fluorocarbon oil. The fluorinated oil may comprise hexafluoropropylene epoxide or a polymer thereof. The liquid mixture may further comprise a fluorosurfactant. In some cases, the chaotrope comprises guanadine thiocyanate or guanidine hydrochloride.
In some cases, the liquid mixture further comprises a polymeric species. The polymeric species may comprise polyacrylamide. The polyacrylamide may comprise a linear polyacrylamide. In some cases, the polymeric species may comprise agarose. The liquid mixture may further comprise a destabilization agent capable of destabilizing an emulsion. The destabilization agent may comprise perfluorooctanol. In some cases, the liquid mixture further comprises a primer. The primer may comprise a barcode sequence. The primer may comprise a random N-mer. Furthermore, the liquid mixture may further comprise a polymerase. The liquid mixture may further comprise a reducing agent.
In some cases, the separating step further comprises separating the support from the liquid mixture under conditions that magnetically immobilize the support to the surface of the vessel. In some cases, after c), the method may further comprise releasing the bound target molecule from the support to provide a released target molecule. The releasing step may be completed with the aid of an elution agent. The elution agent may comprise one or more of the following, without limitation: water, Tris buffer, phosphate buffer, and sodium hydroxide.
The method may further comprise, prior to releasing the bound target molecule from the support, washing the support in one or more wash cycles by contacting the magnetic support with a washing agent. The washing agent may comprise one or more of the following, without limitation: ethanol, isopropanol, and acetone. Furthermore, after releasing the bound target molecule from the support, the method can further comprise subjecting the released target molecule to a solid phase reversible immobilization process. The target molecule may comprise a target nucleic acid molecule. The method may further comprise, after the separating step, determining a sequence of the target nucleic acid molecule.
In some cases, after the separating step, the method may further comprise appending one or more additional nucleotides to the target nucleic acid molecule to provide a larger target nucleic acid molecule. Furthermore, the method may comprise determining a sequence of the larger target nucleic acid molecule. The target molecule comprises a small molecule, a protein, a peptide.
In some cases, the support comprises a magnetic material. In some cases, the support comprises a particle. In some instances, the support is functionalized with a silanol that aids in binding the target molecule to the support. In other instances, the support is functionalized with a carboxylate that aids in binding the target molecule to the support.
In some examples, the vessel may be a tube, a well, a dish and/or a container.
Another aspect of the disclosure provides for a method for sequencing a nucleic acid library, comprising: a) generating a library of nucleic acid molecules, wherein the library comprises a plurality of droplets comprising the nucleic acid molecules; b) destabilizing the plurality of droplets, thereby releasing the nucleic acid molecules from the plurality of droplets into a common pool; c) recovering the nucleic acid molecules from the common pool to provide recovered nucleic acid molecules, wherein recovering comprises: i) in the common pool, immobilizing the nucleic acid molecules to a plurality of supports; and ii) isolating the plurality of supports; and d) determining sequences of at least a subset of the recovered nucleic acid molecules.
In some cases, the nucleic acid molecules comprise a barcode sequence. In some cases, the nucleic acid molecules comprise a random N-mer.
In some instances, the plurality of droplets comprises droplets in an emulsion. Furthermore, the destabilizing step may comprise destabilizing the emulsion.
In some cases, the plurality of supports comprises particles.
Furthermore, the generating step may comprise barcoding sample nucleic acid molecules in the plurality of droplets. Moreover, the immobilizing step may comprise, binding the nucleic acid molecules to the plurality of supports via one or more ionic interactions. Furthermore, the isolating step of c) may comprise subjecting the plurality of supports to one or more cycles of magnetic separation. The isolating step of c) may further comprise subjecting the plurality of supports to one or more cycles of centrifugation. In some cases, the method further comprises, prior to d), releasing the recovered nucleic acid molecules from the plurality of supports. In some cases, the method can further comprise appending one or more additional nucleotides to each of the recovered nucleic acid molecules to provide larger nucleic acid molecules. Furthermore, in d), determining sequences of at least the subset of the recovered nucleic acid molecules may comprise determining sequences of at least a subset of larger nucleic acid molecules.
All publications, patents, and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication, patent, or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the appended claims. A better understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description that sets forth illustrative embodiments, in which the principles of the invention are utilized, and the accompanying drawings of which:
Described herein are methods for isolating the content(s) of a partition, such as a droplet. The methods described herein are useful for isolating target molecule(s) from a mixture that can comprise the contents of one or more partitions. Moreover, the methods described herein may also be useful in the generation of nucleic acid libraries for sequencing. For example, a nucleic acid molecule library (e.g., a sequencing library) may be generated in a plurality of droplets in an emulsion. The contents of the droplets can be released from the droplets, by, for example, destabilizing or breaking the emulsion such that the contents are pooled in a common mixture that includes the nucleic acid molecule library. The nucleic acid molecules in the common mixture can be bound to a plurality of supports. Upon isolating the supports, the nucleic acid molecules can be isolated from the mixture. The nucleic acid molecules can then be washed and the supports isolated in one or more additional cycles, followed by elution of the nucleic acid molecules from the supports. The released nucleic acid molecules can then be further processed and analyzed, such as, for example, sequenced in a nucleic acid sequencing reaction.
Droplets and Emulsions
In one aspect, the methods herein provide for recovering target molecules from a plurality of droplets. In some examples, the methods provide for providing a plurality of droplets having contents that comprise a plurality of target molecules. As used herein, droplets generally refer to small globules of one liquid suspended in a second liquid. Droplets can be formed when two or more immiscible liquids are mixed such as, for example, water and oil. An example of a mixture comprising two or more immiscible liquids is an emulsion, such as a water-in-oil emulsion. The first liquid, which is dispersed in globules, can be referred to as a discontinuous phase, whereas the second liquid, in which the globules are dispersed, can be referred to as a continuous phase or dispersion medium. In some examples, the continuous phase can be a hydrophobic fluid, such as an oil, and the discontinuous phase can be an aqueous phase solution. Such a mixture can be considered a water-in-oil emulsion, wherein aqueous droplets are dispersed in an oil continuous phase. In other cases, an emulsion may be an oil-in-water emulsion. In such an emulsion, the discontinuous phase is a hydrophobic solution (e.g., oil) and the continuous phase is an aqueous solution, wherein droplets of oil are dispersed in an aqueous phase. In some examples, the emulsion may comprise a multiple emulsion. Multiple emulsions can comprise larger fluidic droplets that encompass one or more smaller droplets (i.e., a droplet within a droplet). Multiple emulsions can contain one, two, three, four, or more nested fluids generating increasingly complex droplets within droplets.
An oil of an emulsion may be selected based upon chemical properties, such as, among others molecular structure, content, solvating strength, viscosity, boiling point, thermal expansion coefficient, oil-in-water solubility, water-in-oil solubility, dielectric constant, polarity, water-in-oil surface tension, and/or oil-in-water surface tension. Examples of oils useful in an emulsion (e.g., a water-in-oil emulsion) include, without limitation, fluorinated oils, non-fluorinated oils, alkanes (e.g., hexane, decane, octane, and the like), mineral oils, plant oils, vegetable oils, comestible oils, mineral oil, oleic acid, embryo-tested mineral oil, light mineral oil, heavy mineral oil, PCR mineral oil, AS4 silicone oil, AS 100 silicone oil, AR20 silicone oil, AR 200 silicone oil, AR 1000 silicone oil, AP 100 silicone oil, AP 1000 silicone oil, AP 150 silicone oil, AP 200 silicone oil, CR 200 Silicone oil, DC 200 silicone oil, DC702 silicone oil, DC 710 silicone oil, octanol, decanol, acetophenone, perfluoro-oils, perfluorononane, perfluorodecane, perfluorodimethylcylcohexane, perfluoro-1-butanesulfonyl fluoride, perfluoro-1-octanesulfonyl fluoride, perfluoro-1-octanesulfonyl fluoride, nonafluoro-1-butanesulfonyl chloride, nonafluoro-tert-butyl alcohol, perfluorodecanol, perfluorohexane, perfluorooctanol, perfluorodecene, perfluorohexene, perfluorooctene, fuel oil, halocarbon oil 28, halocarbon oil 700, hydrocarbon oil, glycerol, 3M Fluoriner™ fluids (FC-40, FC-43, FC-70, FC-72, FC-77, FC-84. FC-87, FC-3283), oils comprising trifluoroacetic acid, oils comprising hexafluoroisopropanol, Krytox oils (e.g., oils comprising hexafluoropropylene epoxide and/or polymers thereof), oil comprising polyhexafluoropropylene oxide and/or polymers thereof, Krytox GPL oils, oils comprising perfluoropolyether, oils comprising perfluoroalkylether, oils comprising perfluoropolyalkylether, Solvay Galden oils, oils including oils include hydrofluoroethers (e.g., HFE-7500, HFE-7100, HFE-7200, HFE-7600), oils comprising perfluoroalkylamines (e.g., Fluorinert FC-3283 and Fluorinert FC-40), soybean oil, castor oil, coconut oil, cedar oil, clove bud oil, fir oil, linseed oil, safflower oil, sunflower oil, almond seed oil, anise oil, clove oil, cottonseed oil, corn oil, croton oil, olive oil, palm oil, peanut oil, bay oil, borage oil, bergamot oil, cod liver oil, macadamia nut oil, camada oil, chamomile oil, citronella oil, eucalyptus oil, fennel oil, lavender oil, lemon oil, nutmeg oil orange oil, petitgrain oil, rose oil, tarragon oil, tung oil, basil oil, birch oil, black pepper oil, birch tar oil, carrot seed oil, cardamom oil, cassia oil, sage oil, cognac oil, copaiba balsam oil, cypress oil, eucalyptus oil, dillweed oil, grape fruit oil, ginger oil, juniper oil, lavender oil, lovage oil, majoram oil, mandarin oil, myrrh oil, neroli oil, olibanum oil, onion oil, paraffin oil, origanum oil, parsley oil, peppermint oil, pimenta leaf oil, sage oil, rosemary oil, rose oil, sandalwood oil, sassafras oil, spearmint oil, thyme oil, transformer oil, verbena oil, and rapeseed oil. In some examples, a water-in-oil emulsion may comprise one or more of the oils described herein, wherein aqueous droplets are dispersed in the oil(s).
An emulsion may further comprise a surfactant. The surfactant may be a fluorosurfactant. Surfactants are known to stabilize droplets in a continuous phase. Examples of fluorosurfactants useful for stabilizing droplets are described in detail in U.S. Patent Publication 2010-0105112, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. In some examples, a water-in-oil emulsion may comprise one or more of the oils described herein having one or more surfactants (e.g., fluorosurfactants), wherein aqueous droplets are dispersed in the oil(s).
Droplets may be formed by a variety of methods. Emulsion systems for creating stable droplets in non-aqueous or oil continuous phases are described in detail in, e.g., Published U.S. Patent Publication No. 2010-0105112. In some cases, microfluidic channel networks are particularly suited for generating droplets as described herein. Examples of such microfluidic devices include those described in detail in Provisional U.S. Patent Application No. 61/977,804, filed Apr. 4, 2014, the full disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes. Droplets may be formed with a regular periodicity or may be formed with an irregular periodicity. In some aspects, the size and/or shape of the droplet may be determined by the size and shape of a channel in which the droplet is formed.
In some examples, droplets may generally be generated by flowing an aqueous stream into a junction of two or more channels of a microfluidic system into which is also flowing a non-aqueous stream of fluid, e.g., a fluorinated oil, such that aqueous droplets are created within the flowing stream non-aqueous fluid. The aqueous stream can include one or more species such that upon droplet formation, the droplet contents comprise aqueous interiors comprising the one or more species. Additional examples of such species are provided elsewhere herein. The relative amount of species within a droplet may be adjusted by controlling a variety of different parameters of the system, including, for example, the concentration of species in the aqueous stream, the flow rate of the aqueous stream and/or the non-aqueous stream, and the like.
Droplets may have overall volumes that are less than 1000 pL, less than 900 pL, less than 800 pL, less than 700 pL, less than 600 pL, less than 500 pL, less than 400 pL, less than 300 pL, less than 200 pL, less than 100 pL, less than 50 pL, less than 20 pL, less than 10 pL, or even less than 1 pL. Droplets may be monodisperse (i.e., substantially uniform in size) or polydisperse (i.e., substantially non-uniform in size). A plurality of droplets may be generated.
An emulsion may comprise a varied number of droplets depending upon the particular emulsion. For example, an emulsion may comprise at least 10 droplets, at least 50 droplets, at least 100 droplets, at least 500 droplets, at least 1000 droplets, at least 5000 droplets, at least 10,000 droplets, at least 50,000 droplets, at least 100,000 droplets, at least 500,000 droplets, at least 1,000,000 droplets, at least 5,000,000 droplets, at least 10,000,000 droplets, at least 50,000,000 droplets, at least 100,000,000 droplets and upwards.
Contents of Droplets
Droplets can encapsulate one or more species, such as one or more target molecules and/or particles. Put another way, a droplet can be a discrete partition, isolating one or more target molecules and/or particles. Generally, a discontinuous phase can be selected to be compatible with the target molecule(s) and/or particle(s) that are encapsulated. For example, a nucleic acid can be encapsulated in an aqueous droplet (e.g., a buffer). A target molecule can generally refer to a species of particular interest in which further analysis or sequestration of the species is desired. For example a target molecule may be a target nucleic acid molecule. A target nucleic acid molecule may be, for example, single-stranded, partially single-stranded, partially double-stranded, or double-stranded. A target nucleic acid molecule may be any type of nucleic acid with non-limiting examples that include oligonucleotides, nucleotides, DNA, RNA, peptide polynucleotides, complementary DNA (cDNA), double stranded DNA (dsDNA), single stranded DNA (ssDNA), plasmid DNA, cosmid DNA, chromosomal DNA, genomic DNA, viral DNA, bacterial DNA, mtDNA (mitochondrial DNA), mRNA, rRNA, tRNA, nRNA, siRNA, snRNA, snoRNA, scaRNA, microRNA, dsRNA, ribozyme, riboswitch and viral RNA, a locked nucleic acid (LNA) in whole or part, locked nucleic acid nucleotides and any other type of nucleic acid analogue
Other non-limiting examples of target molecules include peptides, proteins, small molecules and the like. In some cases a plurality of droplets may comprise a plurality of target molecules, such as a plurality of target nucleic acid molecules. In such cases, the plurality of droplets may be a nucleic acid library, wherein the droplets comprise nucleic acids for sequencing (e.g., a sequencing library).
A droplet may comprise a single target molecule or may comprise e a plurality of target molecules (e.g., target molecules). In some examples, one or more target molecules may be bound to a solid support. For examples, target molecules may be nucleic acids bound to a bead (e.g., polyacrylamide bead). In other examples, a target molecule may be a protein expressed on the surface of a biological cell. Target molecules may be the product of a chemical or biological reaction as described elsewhere herein.
Droplets may comprise any suitable type and/or number of species that can include, but are not limited to, nucleic acids (DNA), proteins, small molecules, peptides, biological cells (e.g., mammalian cells, bacterial cells), and the like. The contents of droplets may also comprise one or more particles, such as, for example beads. A particle may be any form of minute matter, natural or synthetic, that is small enough in size to be encapsulated by a droplet. In further examples, droplets may encapsulate a combination of particles and other species described herein. For example, a droplet may encapsulate a particle coated or bound with one or more additional species, such as, for example, a bead coated with nucleic acids.
In some examples, a droplet may comprise a particle such as bead, including gel beads and other types of beads. In particular, these particles may provide a surface to which reagents are releasably attached, or a volume in which reagents are entrained or otherwise releasably partitioned. These reagents may then be delivered in accordance with a desired method, for example, in the controlled delivery of reagents into droplets. A wide variety of different reagents or reagent types may be associated with the particles, where one may desire to deliver such reagents to a droplet. Non-limiting examples of such reagents include, e.g., enzymes, polypeptides, antibodies or antibody fragments, labeling reagents, e.g., dyes, fluorophores, chromophores, etc., nucleic acids, polynucleotides, oligonucleotides, and any combination of two or more of the foregoing. In some cases, the particles may provide a surface upon which to synthesize or attach oligonucleotide sequences. Various entities including oligonucleotides, barcode sequences, primers, crosslinkers and the like may be associated with the outer surface of a particle. In the case of porous particles, an entity may be associated with both the outer and inner surfaces of a particle. The entities may be attached directly to the surface of a particle (e.g., via a covalent bond, ionic bond, van der Waals interactions, etc.), may be attached to other oligonucleotide sequences attached to the surface of a particle (e.g. adaptor or primers), may be diffused throughout the interior of a particle and/or may be combined with a particle in a partition (e.g. fluidic droplet). In some cases, an entity such as a cell or nucleic acid is encapsulated within a particle. Other entities including amplification reagents (e.g., PCR reagents, primers) may also be diffused throughout the particle or chemically-linked within the interior (e.g., via pores, covalent attachment to polymeric matrix) of a particle. Additional examples of particles that may be useful are described in U.S. Patent Publication 2014-0378345, the full disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
A particle may comprise natural and/or synthetic materials, including natural and synthetic polymers. Examples of natural polymers include proteins and sugars such as deoxyribonucleic acid, rubber, cellulose, starch (e.g. amylose, amylopectin), proteins, enzymes, polysaccharides, silks, polyhydroxyalkanoates, chitosan, dextran, collagen, carrageenan, ispaghula, acacia, agar, gelatin, shellac, sterculia gum, xanthan gum, Corn sugar gum, guar gum, gum karaya, agarose, alginic acid, alginate, or natural polymers thereof. Examples of synthetic polymers include acrylics, nylons, silicones, spandex, viscose rayon, polycarboxylic acids, polyvinyl acetate, polyacrylamide, polyacrylate, polyethylene glycol, polyurethanes, polylactic acid, silica, polystyrene, polyacrylonitrile, polybutadiene, polycarbonate, polyethylene, polyethylene terephthalate, poly(chlorotrifluoroethylene), poly(ethylene oxide), poly(ethylene terephthalate), polyethylene, polyisobutylene, poly(methyl methacrylate), poly(oxymethylene), polyformaldehyde, polypropylene, polystyrene, poly(tetrafluoroethylene), poly(vinyl acetate), poly(vinyl alcohol), poly(vinyl chloride), poly(vinylidene dichloride), poly(vinylidene difluoride), poly(vinyl fluoride) and combinations (e.g., co-polymers) thereof. Particles may also be formed from materials other than polymers, including lipids, micelles, ceramics, glass-ceramics, material composites, metals, other inorganic materials, and others. In exemplary cases, the particle may comprise polyacrylamide. The polyacrylamide particle may comprise linear polyacrylamide (LPA). In other examples, the particle may comprise agarose.
In certain examples, reagents for one or more chemical or biological reaction can be encapsulated such that a droplet functions as a small reaction chamber in which a chemical or biological reaction(s) may take place. In these examples, the discontinuous phase can be selected to be compatible with the desired chemical or biological reaction(s) (i.e., can provide suitable conditions for the reaction to occur). In the case of a chemical or biological reaction, a droplet may include suitable components for the chemical or biological reaction to take place, such as, for example an enzyme, reactants, any necessary co-factors, etc. Once the reaction(s) takes place, the droplet can also comprise any products/by-products of the reaction(s). The biological reaction can be any number of enzymatic reactions that can be carried out in a droplet.
An example of a biological reaction that may take place in a droplet includes a primer extension reaction that may be useful in a nucleic acid amplification reaction, such as, for example a polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In cases where a primer extension reaction takes place in a droplet, the droplet may comprise components for a primer extension reaction (i.e., template nucleic acid, primers, a polymerase, dNTPs, and the like). In some cases, the contents of the droplets may comprise a polymerase and/or any other enzyme for use in an amplification reaction. In other cases, the contents of the droplets may comprise a primer. In some cases, the primer may comprise a barcode sequence. In some cases, the primers may comprise a random N-mer. Examples of barcoding nucleic acid molecules in droplets are described below. As described elsewhere herein, a target molecule can be a target nucleic acid molecule. The target nucleic acid molecule may act as a template for an amplification reaction. Additional examples of amplification reactions that may be completed in droplets are provided by U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/316,383, filed Jun. 26, 2014, the full disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
An example of a chemical reaction that can be conducted within a droplet is the dissolution or degradation of a particle in the droplet, such as a bead. A degradable particle may comprise one or more species with a labile bond such that when the particle/species is exposed to the appropriate stimuli, the bond is broken and the particle degrades. The labile bond may be a chemical bond (e.g., covalent bond, ionic bond) or may be another type of physical interaction (e.g., van der Waals interactions, dipole-dipole interactions, etc.). In some cases, a crosslinker used to generate a particle may comprise a labile bond. Upon exposure to the appropriate conditions, the labile bond is broken and the particle is degraded. For example, a polyacrylamide gel particle may comprise cystamine crosslinkers. Upon exposure of the particle to a reducing agent, the disulfide bonds of the cystamine are broken and the particle is degraded. Accordingly, a droplet may comprise a reducing agent that is capable of dissolving or degrading a particle having one or more disulfide bonds. Moreover, in the case of a polymeric particle, a droplet may comprise polymeric by-products (e.g., polymeric species) of a degraded particle. For example, in the case of a polyacrylamide particle, the droplet may comprise one or more polyacrylamide species, such as linear polyacrylamide (LPA), resulting from degradation of the particle.
Particles may also be degradable, disruptable, or dissolvable spontaneously or upon exposure to one or more stimuli (e.g., temperature changes, pH changes, exposure to chemical species or phase, exposure to light, reducing agent, etc.). In some cases, a particle may be dissolvable, such that material components of the particles are solubilized when exposed to a particular chemical species or an environmental change, such as, for example, temperature, or pH. For example, a gel bead may be degraded or dissolved at elevated temperature and/or in basic conditions. In some cases, a particle may be thermally degradable such that when the bead is exposed to an appropriate change in temperature (e.g., heat), the particle degrades. Degradation or dissolution of a particle bound to a species (e.g., a nucleic acid species) may result in release of the species from the particle.
Based upon the presence of primer sequence 116, the oligonucleotides are able to prime the sample nucleic acid as shown in
The barcoded nucleic acid fragments may then be subjected to characterization, e.g., through sequence analysis, or they may be further amplified in the process, as shown in
All of the fragments from multiple different droplets may then be pooled (e.g., by collecting droplets and destabilizing the emulsion as described elsewhere herein) for sequencing on high throughput sequencers. Because each fragment is coded as to its droplet of origin, the sequence of that fragment may be attributed back to its origin based upon the presence of the barcode.
As can be appreciated, the example amplification scheme depicted in
Additional examples of amplification reactions that can be performed in droplets or other types of partitions, including amplification reactions that can be used to generate nucleic acid libraries for sequencing, are provided in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/102,420, filed Jan. 12, 2015, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
Releasing Contents of Droplets to Form a Pooled Mixture
Methods described herein provide for releasing the contents of a droplet or a plurality of droplets, such as, for example releasing one or more target molecules from a droplet or plurality of droplets. Generally, the contents of a droplet or a plurality of droplets can contain one or more target molecules and it may be desirable to recover the target molecule(s). A target molecule or target molecules that have been released from a droplet or plurality of droplets are herein referred to as a “released target molecule” or “released target molecules.” Releasing can encompass any method by which the contents of a droplet are liberated. Examples of releasing can include breaking the surface of the droplet, making the droplet porous such that the contents can diffuse out of the droplet, or any other method in which the contents of the droplet would be liberated.
In some cases, a droplet or a plurality of droplets can be destabilized (broken) to release the contents of the droplet(s) into a pooled mixture. For example, destabilizing a droplet or plurality of droplets in an emulsion may comprise destabilizing the emulsion. The terms “destabilize,” “break,” “burst,” and “de-emulsify” may be used interchangeably herein. Methods of destabilizing droplets are known to those of skill in the art. Briefly, droplets in an emulsion can be mixed with a destabilization agent that causes the droplet to destabilize and to coalesce. Coalescence of the droplets can result in the generation of a pooled mixture (e.g., a common pool) comprising the contents of the droplets, including target molecules and any other contents of the droplets (e.g., non-target molecules such as enzymes, additional reaction products, reaction by-products reactants, co-factors, buffers, etc.). In general, the pooled mixture is a liquid mixture. Where the droplets are aqueous droplets, the pooled mixture may comprise an aqueous mixture. The pooled mixture may also comprise any amount of continuous phase (e.g., oil) material in which the droplets were originally dispersed surfactants in the continuous phase, and/or the destabilization agent where applicable. For example, in the case of an aqueous droplet or aqueous droplets comprising a degraded polyacrylamide bead and target molecules and originally dispersed in a fluorinated oil, the pooled mixture may comprise one or more of linear polyacrylamide from the degraded beads, the target molecules and the fluorinated oil.
In some examples, a droplet or plurality of droplets may be collected into a vessel and the destabilization agent may be added to the vessel to form the pooled mixture in the vessel. The term “vessel” as used herein means any container that can hold a liquid mixture. A vessel may include, without limitation, a droplet, a tube, a well, a container, a dish, a flask, a beaker, and the like.
The destabilization agent can be any agent that induces droplets of the emulsion to coalesce with one another. The destabilization agent may be present at an amount effective to induce coalescence, which may be selected based, for example, on the volume of the emulsion, the volume of carrier fluid in the emulsion, and/or the total volume of droplets, among others. The amount also or alternatively may be selected, based, for example, on the type of carrier fluid, amount and type of surfactant in each phase, etc. In exemplary embodiments, the destabilization agent can be added to an emulsion, or vice versa, such that the destabilization agent is present in excess over the continuous phase of the emulsion. The ratio of destabilization agent to continuous phase, by volume, may be at least about 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5, among others. In some embodiments, the destabilization agent may be a fluid.
The destabilization agent may be a weak surfactant. Without wishing to be bound by theory, a weak surfactant can compete with droplet surfactant at the oil/aqueous interface causing an emulsion to collapse. In some cases, the destabilization agent is perfluorooctanol (PFO), however, other fluorous compounds with a small hydrophilic group may be used. Other examples of destabilization agents include one or more halogen-substituted hydrocarbons. In some cases, the destabilization agent may be predominantly or at least substantially composed of one or more halogen-substituted hydrocarbons. Each halogen-substituted hydrocarbon may be substituted with one or more halogen substituents provided by the same halogen element (i.e., one or more fluorine, chlorine, bromine, iodine, or astatine substituents) and/or two or more different halogen elements (e.g., at least one fluorine substituent and at least one chlorine substituent, at least one fluorine substituent and at least one bromine substituent, at least one chlorine substituent and at least one bromine substituent, and so on). The halogen-substituted hydrocarbon also optionally may include other non-halogen substituents. In some cases, the halogen-substituted hydrocarbon may have a formula weight of less than about 1000, 500, or 200 daltons, among others. Also or alternatively, the halogen-substituted hydrocarbon may be composed of no more than ten, five, or two carbons. Exemplary halogen-substituted hydrocarbons that may be included in the destabilization agent include chloroform, dichloromethane (methylene chloride), iodomethane, bromochloropropane, or dichlorofluoroethane, among others. The destabilization agent may have a low viscosity and may be capable of denaturing proteins present in the droplets and/or at an interface between the droplets and the carrier fluid. Additional examples of destabilization agents are provided in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2013-018970, the full disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
Purifying Target Molecules from a Pooled Mixture
A target molecule(s) partitioned into a droplet(s) may be recovered for use in downstream applications (e.g., target nucleic acid molecules for sequencing). However, the success of downstream applications can be affected by one or more non-target molecules present in the droplets or emulsion comprising the droplets and, thus, a pooled mixture as described above. In some cases, the presence of one or more contaminants in a pooled mixture can negatively impact the success of downstream applications. Therefore, it may be desirable to purify the target molecule(s) from one or more non-target molecule(s) or “contaminants”. A “contaminant” as used herein can generally refer to any non-target substance (i.e., chemical, biological, or otherwise) derived from the contents of a droplet or droplets and present in a pooled mixture generated as described elsewhere herein. Contaminants can include, without limitation, one or more oils (e.g., fluorinated oils), salts, biological materials (e.g., nucleic acids, proteins, lipids, etc), surfactants, polymers (e.g., polymers from degraded polymeric particles, such as linear polyacrylamide from a degraded polymeric particle), reactants, destabilization agents, reaction by-products, additional reaction products, enzymes (e.g., polymerases), primers, co-factors and the like. Contaminants can be components of the droplets, components of the partitioning fluids, components of an enzymatic reaction (e.g., PCR reagents, for example, enzymes, primers, dNTPs, and the like), etc.
Target molecules may be purified from contaminants in a pooled mixture by contacting the target molecules with one or more supports and isolating the supports from the pooled mixture. For example, the one or more supports can be provided to the pooled mixture or a vessel (as described elsewhere herein) comprising the pooled mixture. In such cases, the pooled mixture may comprise the contents of one or more droplets and one or more supports. A support generally refers to any species (e.g., a scaffolding or platform) that can selectively bind one or more target molecules in a pooled mixture. In some cases, the support may be solid or, in other cases, the support may be liquid. Moreover, the support may be essentially of any shape, size or material. In some cases, a support may be a particle, such as, for example, a bead.
The support may have one or more surfaces on which target molecules can bind and is generally separable from the pooled mixture. For example, the support may bind a target molecule in a pooled mixture and then the support can be isolated or separated from the non-target molecules such that the target molecule is also separated from the pooled mixture. A target molecule that has been bound to a support can be referred to herein as a “bound target molecule”.
Binding of target molecules to a support may be through any suitable means, including ionic interactions, hydrophilic/hydrophobic interactions, van der Waals forces, covalent bonds, non-covalent bonds, etc. Binding of a target molecule to the surface of a support may be specific or non-specific. Binding of a target molecule to a support may be specific for a class of target molecules (e.g., specific for nucleic acid molecules such as DNA). In this example, all or substantially all nucleic acid may be bound to the support. In other examples, the support may bind to a specific species of target molecule. In yet further examples, the support may selectively bind to target molecules of a particular size (e.g., the support may selectively bind to nucleic acids greater than 100 basepairs). The surface of the support may inherently bind to a class of target molecules or the surface of the support may be modified to bind to a class of target molecules.
In some examples, a support may be tailored such that particular target molecules can bind. For example, in the case where a target molecule is a nucleic acid (e.g., DNA, mRNA, etc) the surface of a support can tailored to bind nucleic acids by functionalizing the support with one or more species capable of binding nucleic acids. A variety of methods for modifying the surface of a support such that said surface can bind nucleic acids are known. For instance, the support may be modified by any number of polycations. The polycationic support can be selected from a wide variety of inorganic and organic materials including, but not limited to, metal oxides, glasses, polyamides, polyesters, polyolefins, polysaccharides, polyglycols, and polyaminoacids. In some cases, the support may be a silica bead or silica resin. In some cases, the binding of target nucleic acid molecules to one or more supports may be via one or more ionic interactions.
Supports may be modified with any number of polymers that bind nucleic acids. By way of example, without limitation, polymers that bind nucleic acids include dextran, polyethylene glycol (PEG), polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), polysaccharides (e.g., include dextran, ficoll, glycogen, gum arabic, xanthan gum, carageenan, amylose, agar, amylopectin, xylans, beta-glucans, and many others), chemical resins (isocyanate, glycerol, piperidino-methyl, polyDMAP (polymer-bound dimethyl 4-aminopyridine), DIPAM (Diisopropylaminomethyl), aminomethyl, polystyrene aldehyde, tris(2-aminomethyl) amine, morpholino-methyl, BOBA (3-Benzyloxybenzaldehyde), triphenyl-phosphine, and benzylthio-methyl, and others). It should be understood that surfaces modified with polymers or functional groups can, with some exceptions, bind target nucleic acid molecules without regard to nucleic acid sequence. However, methods in which nucleic acids specifically bind to the surface of a support (i.e., sequence-dependent binding) are also contemplated. In these examples, an oligonucleotide probe may be attached (i.e., via chemical modification) to a support. The oligonucleotide probe may contain a sequence of nucleotides that can selectively bind to a target nucleic acid molecule sequence present in the pooled mixture.
Additional examples of functional groups with which a support may be functionalized include, without limitation, alkanes, alkenes, alkynes, diene, alcohols, ethers, aldehydes, ketones, carboxylic acids, esters, amides, amines, nitriles, thiols, silanols, and the like. In some examples, a support may comprise a silica or silica-like (i.e., modified to incorporate silanol on the surface) functionalization. In some cases, the support can bind nucleic acids. In some cases, the surface of the support can be silica-like and the support can bind nucleic acids.
In some instances, it may be desirable to bind other target molecules to the surface of a support. For example, the target molecule may be a small molecule, a protein, a peptide, and the like. In some aspects, the target molecule may be a protein. Methods of binding proteins to solid supports are well known. For example, the surface of the support may be coated with antibodies and the antibodies may recognize a specific epitope of a protein. In another example, the support may be coated with streptavidin and the target protein molecule may contain a biotin molecule. Streptavidin has a high affinity for biotin and is a commonly used method for pulling down proteins modified with biotin moieties. Other suitable examples may include coating the support with a protein that interacts with the target protein, for example, a surface coated with a receptor protein to bind a ligand present in the pooled mixture.
It may be desirable to provide suitable binding conditions to promote binding of a target molecule to a support. A number of factors can affect the conditions suitable for binding a target molecule to a support. Non-limiting examples of such factors include the surface modification of the support, the type of target molecule, and the composition of the pooled mixture (i.e., chemicals, non-target molecules, etc., present in the pooled mixture). In some embodiments, the pooled mixture may comprise one or more additional agents that aid in binding target molecules to supports. Non-limiting examples of such agents include buffer salts, detergents, enzymes, nuclease inhibitors, chelators, organic solvents, and other organic or inorganic substances.
In some examples, an agent that aids in binding target molecules to one or more supports may comprise a chaotropic agent or chaotrope. “Chaotropic agent” and “chaotrope” are used interchangeably herein. Any suitable concentration of chaotropic agent may be used. For example, the concentration of chaotropic agent used may be from about 0.01 molar (M) to about 20 M. In some cases, the concentration of chaotropic agent used may be from about 0.1 M to about 10 M. In some cases, the concentration of chaotropic agent used may be from about 1 M to about 8 M. In some cases, the concentration of chaotropic agent used may be from about 1M to about 5M. In some cases, the concentration of chaotropic agent used may be about 0.01 M, 0.05M, 0.1M, 0.2 M, 0.3 M, 0.4 M, 0.5 M, 1.0 M, 1.5 M, 2.0 M, 2.5 M, 3.0 M, 3.5 M, 4.0 M, 4.5 M, 5.0 M, 5.5 M, 6.0 M, 6.5 M, 7.0 M, 7.5 M, 8.0 M, 8.5 M, 9.0 M, 9.5 M, 10.0 M, 10.5 M, 11.0 M, 11.5 M, 12.0 M, 12.5 M, 13.5 M, 14.0 M, 14.5 M, 15.0 M, 15.5 M, 16.0 M, 16.5 M, 17.0 M, 17.5 M, 18.0 M, 18.5 M, 19.0 M, 19.5 M, 20.0 M or more.
In some cases, the chaotropic agent may comprise a chaotropic salt. Binding of the nucleic acids on a substrate in the presence of chaotropic reagents may be that adsorption of nucleic acids to a substrate lie in disturbances of higher-order structures of the aqueous medium. Such disturbance can lead to adsorption or denaturation of dissolved nucleic acid on the surface of the glass or silica-gel particles. In the presence of chaotropic salts, such adsorption is enhanced. In some examples, binding of target molecules in a pooled mixture may be binding with a silica particle or silica-coated particle in the presence of a chaotropic salt. In such examples, the target molecule may be a nucleic acid. Moreover, in some cases, polyethylene glycol (PEG) may be present in a pooled mixture to aid in the binding of target molecules (e.g., target nucleic acid molecules) to one or more supports.
In some examples, the chaotropic agent is guanidine thiocyanate (GuSCN), however, essentially any chaotropic agent may be used. In other examples, the chaotropic agent is guanidine hydrochloride (GuHCl). Other non-limiting examples of chaotropic agents include, without limitation, urea, sodium perchlorate, lithium perchlorate, lithium acetate, lithium chloride, magnesium chloride, sodium acetate, potassium acetate, potassium chloride, sodium iodide, sodium chloride, ethanol, isopropanol and combinations thereof.
In some cases, a support may comprise at least one component, such as one or more magnetic materials, that is responsive to a magnetic force. In some cases, a support may be entirely magnetic. In some cases, a support may be a magnetic particle, such as a magnetic bead. In such cases, the magnetic particle may be entirely magnetic or may comprise one or more magnetic cores surrounded by one or more additional materials, such as, for example, one or more functional groups and/or modifications for binding one or more target molecules.
In some examples, a support may comprise a magnetic component and a surface modified with one or more silanol groups. Supports of this type may be used for binding target nucleic acid molecules. Silanol-modified magnetic beads are commercially available (AccuBead silica-coated magnetic beads available from Bioneer, silane-modified Dynabeads available from Life Technologies, MagSi beads available from AMSBIO, among others). In some examples, a support may be a magnetic bead or particle and the surface may be functionalized with a plurality of carboxyl groups. Such supports can make use of solid phase reverse immobilization (SPRI) technology. Carboxylated magnetic beads are available from commercial sources, for example, Agencourt AMPure XP SPRI beads available from Beckman-Coulter.
Magnetic materials may be classified according to their magnetic properties. Without wishing to be bound by theory, materials can generally be classified as diamagnetic, paramagnetic, or ferromagnetic. Diamagnetism is a property of all materials and can be a weak magnetic force. When diamagnetism is a magnetic property of a material, the material can be considered “diamagnetic.” Diamagnetic materials can create an induced magnetic field in a direction opposite to an externally applied magnetic field. Paramagnetic materials can be attracted by an externally applied magnetic field and form induced magnetic fields in the direction of the applied magnetic field. Ferromagnetic materials are those that can be become permanently magnetized in the presence of a magnetic field. Examples of magnetic materials that may be included in a support include iron, nickel, cobalt, composites thereof and alloys thereof. In some cases, a magnetic material may include one or more iron-oxides, such as magnetite or maghemite.
One or more magnetic supports can be isolated and/or immobilized by applying a magnetic force to the one or more supports (e.g., magnetic separation). A magnetic force can be applied to one or more supports by exposing the one or more supports to an external magnetic field. Such an external magnetic field may be provided by one or more magnetic sources such as, for example, by one or more magnets (e.g., permanent magnetic, electromagnet, etc.). The magnetic responsiveness of a support to a magnetic force can be useful in isolating a support having bound target molecules from a pooled mixture. Application of a magnetic force to the support can result in separation of the support from other components in a pooled mixture. Accordingly, any molecule (e.g., one or more target molecules) that is also bound to the support, covalently or non-covalently, can also be separated from non-bound components in a pooled mixture. When an external magnetic field is applied to a support, the support can be attracted via magnetic force in the direction of the external magnetic field. The source of an external magnetic field, such as one or more magnets, can be positioned such that a support or a plurality of supports is attracted to one or more specific locations. For example, when one or more supports are provided to a pooled mixture in a vessel, the one or more supports may be positioned at one or more locations (e.g., surfaces) of the vessel. For example, a magnetic source can immobilize a support at the bottom of a vessel. In some cases, a magnetic source can immobilize a support on a wall of a vessel.
Magnetic immobilization/separation of one or more supports at multiple positions within a vessel may be used in purification. Magnetic separation at multiple positions within a vessel may occur simultaneously (e.g., one or more supports simultaneously positioned at a plurality of locations within a vessel) or sequentially (e.g., a first round of magnetic separation at a first location, a second round or magnetic separation at a second location, etc.). For example, one or more magnetic supports may be provided to a vessel comprising a liquid pooled mixture comprising contents of one or more destabilized droplets that comprise one or more target molecules. The one or more supports can bind the target molecule(s) to provide a bound target molecule(s). Following binding of target nucleic acid molecules to the one or more supports, the one or more supports can be immobilized at a first location of the vessel via an external magnetic field as described elsewhere herein, thereby separating or isolating the one or more supports (and associated target nucleic acid molecules) from the pooled mixture. For example, an external magnetic field may be applied to the vessel such that a magnetic support comprising a bound target molecule within the vessel is attracted or pulled towards the first location. The first location may be any portion of a wall of the vessel or the bottom of the vessel Immobilized supports may be in the form of a pellet at the bottom or on the wall of a vessel. Generally, an immobilized support can be segregated in a vessel and the movement of the immobilized support can be restricted (e.g., to the bottom of or the wall of a vessel).
Next, the remnant liquid pooled mixture can be removed from the vessel, without removing immobilized support(s) from the vessel. Removal of the liquid pooled mixture from the vessel may be by any method known of removing a liquid from a vessel, including, but not limited to, pipetting, suctioning, decanting, pouring, and the like. A suspension fluid may then be provided to the vessel and the external magnetic field may be removed from the supports, thereby suspending the support in the suspension fluid. A suspension fluid may be any fluid, aqueous or otherwise, that can be used to release the support from an immobilized state. Essentially any fluid may be used as a suspension fluid, although generally, the suspension fluid can be selected such that it is compatible with the support and the target molecule and such that it will not disrupt the binding of the target molecule to the support. In some cases, the suspension fluid may promote the binding of a target molecule to the support. In some examples, the target molecule may be a target nucleic acid molecule and the suspension fluid may comprise a chaotrope (e.g., guanidine thiocyanate or guanidine hydrochloride). In some cases, the suspension fluid may be a washing agent (e.g., ethanol, isopropanol, acetone, etc.) as described elsewhere herein. Suspending a support may involve the addition of a suspension fluid to the vessel and then physically agitating the support, such as by pipetting or vortexing.
The suspended support(s) comprising the bound target molecule(s) may then be immobilized at a second location of the vessel, thereby separating the support(s) and associated bound target molecule(s) from the suspension fluid. The second location of the vessel may be the same location as the first location of the vessel or may be a different than the first location of the vessel. For example, an external magnetic source may be applied to the vessel such that the magnetic support comprising a bound target molecule within the vessel is attracted or pulled towards the second location. The second location may be any portion of a wall of the vessel or may be at the bottom of the vessel Immobilizing a magnetic support at a first location and a different second location may be accomplished by adjusting the location of the applied external magnetic field (e.g., adjusting the positioning of one or more magnetic sources providing the applied external magnetic field). Devices described elsewhere herein may be useful in adjusting the positioning of one or more magnetic sources (and associated external magnetic fields).
One or more magnetic sources may be provided in a device that can receive one or more vessels such that the magnetic source(s) immobilize one or more supports to one or more surfaces of the one or more vessels. The device may comprise one or more holders or receptacles for receiving one or more vessels, where each holder or receptacle is associated with one or more magnetic sources that provide an external magnetic field to each respective vessel. In some cases, such a magnetic source may comprise one or more magnets. In such cases, the one or more magnetic sources may be positioned in such a way that the one or more magnetic supports are drawn towards a particular portion of the vessel (e.g., a surface of the vessel, a wall of the vessel, the bottom of the vessel, etc.). In some cases, a position of a magnetic source in a device may be adjustable such that the external magnetic field generated by the magnetic source can be adjusted to immobilize one or more supports at a variety of locations within a vessel. In some examples, one or more magnetic sources may be included in a sliding rack also a part of a device. In such a configuration, the position of the one or more magnetic sources may be adjusted by moving the sliding rack (e.g., moving the sliding rack up and down) to a desired position. A device may also include a latch or other component suitable for immobilizing a sliding rack at a desired position. A device having an adjustable magnetic source can be useful in cases where magnetic separation at different locations of a vessel, as described elsewhere herein, is desirable. In some cases, a device may comprise a plurality of magnetic sources associated with a receptacle for receiving a vessel, where each of the magnets is positioned at a different location with respect to the receptacle. In some cases, repositioning of a magnetic source and associated external magnetic field within a device may be achieved by repositioning the entire device, such as flipping the device over, rotating the device, etc. In some cases, repositioning of a vessel within a device may, with respect to the vessel, result in repositioning of an applied external magnetic field exerted by a magnetic source of the device. As can be appreciated any suitable combination of repositioning a magnetic source, repositioning of a device comprising a magnetic source, and repositioning a vessel within a device may be used to position supports at multiple locations of a vessel. Moreover, a device may comprise a plurality of receptacles and accompanying magnetic sources such that a plurality of vessels can be processed in parallel. Any suitable number of receptacles and accompanying magnetic sources may be included.
An example device suitable for performing magnetic separations, including those described herein, is schematically depicted in various views in
The vessels 603 can then be removed from magnetic separation device 600 such that the immobilized magnetic material in vessels 603 is released. Release may be further facilitated by addition of a wash fluid and agitation (e.g., via vortexing or pipetting). Magnetic separation device 600 may be flipped over 609 (e.g., rotated approximately 180 degrees) such that receptacles 602 receive vessels 603, as shown in
While only magnetic separation device 600 is shown as capable of processing up to eight vessels in parallel, it can be appreciated that magnetic separation device 600 could include any suitable number of receptacles and accompanying magnets for parallel processing of vessels of fewer or greater numbers of vessels.
Another example device suitable for performing magnetic separations, including those described herein, is schematically depicted in
Upon flipping magnetic separation device 700 over 706 (e.g., rotating magnetic separation device 700 approximately 180 degrees), magnetic separation device is in position 700B, as shown in
Another example device suitable for performing magnetic separations, including those described herein, is schematically depicted in
Another example device suitable for performing magnetic separations, including those described herein, is schematically depicted in
It should be understood that other methods of separating supports from a pooled mixture can be used. In some examples, one or more supports may be separated using centrifugation. In this case, one or more supports with bound target molecules can be centrifuged such that the supports are pelleted at the bottom of a vessel. Examples of support materials useful for centrifugation separation may include, without limitation, agarose beads, gel beads, glass beads, and the like. Essentially any support with a density greater than the mixture it is contained within can be separated using centrifugation.
After one more supports comprising one or more bound target molecules are separated from a pooled mixture, the non-separated components of the pooled mixture can be removed by, for example, removing the remnant mixture. Any method of removing the non-separated components of the pooled mixture may be used. Such methods of removing may include, without limitation, pipetting, decanting, pouring, suctioning (e.g., by a vacuum), evaporating, sublimating, vaporizing, and the like.
A support that is been separated from a pooled mixture may be washed in one or more cycles to further remove any remaining undesired components associated with the supports. For example, prior to releasing a bound target molecule(s) from one or more supports, the supports may be washed in one or more wash steps by contacting the supports with a washing agent. In general, the supports can be washed with a washing agent that is compatible with both the support and the bound target molecule. The washing agent can be selected such that it does not disrupt the binding of the target molecule(s) to the support(s). For example, washing target nucleic acids bound to a support may be carried out with an alcohol, for example, ethanol or isopropanol. Alternatively, the washing agent may be an organic solvent (e.g., acetone). A washing step may comprise a step of mixing the support with the washing agent (i.e., pipetting the support up and down, vortexing, etc.). In this case, another step of separating may be necessary to separate the support from the washing agent (e.g., reapplying a magnetic field to a vessel to separate magnetic supports from the washing agent, centrifugation, etc.). Any suitable separation method can be utilized including purification methods described herein. In some examples, the supports may not be washed. In some instances, more than one wash step may be desired, e.g., 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or more wash steps.
Following purification, bound target molecules can be recovered from the one or more supports for downstream applications or for further processing. Recovery can be achieved by releasing or eluting the bound target molecules from the one or more supports. For example, releasing bound target molecules may be may include containing the one or more supports with an elution agent that aids in releasing bound target molecules from the supports. Contacting the one or more supports with elution agent may comprise mixing the supports with the elution agent (e.g., pipetting up and down, vortexing, etc.). An elution agent can be selected such that it can effectively release the bound target molecules from the supports. Non-limiting examples of elution agents include water, Tris buffer, phosphate buffer, and sodium hydroxide. In some cases, bound nucleic acid molecules can be eluted in a buffer of low ionic strength (e.g., TE buffer, or a similar buffer).
In some examples, release of target molecules from one or more supports may be achieved with heating of the supports. The supports may be heated to 50° C., 51° C., 52° C., 53° C., 54° C., 55° C., 56° C., 57° C., 58° C., 59° C., 60° C., 61° C., 62° C., 63° C., 64° C., 65° C., 66° C., 67° C., 68° C., 69° C., 70° C., 71° C., 72° C., 73° C., 74° C., 75° C., 76° C., 77° C., 78° C., 79° C., 80° C., 81° C., 82° C., 83° C., 84° C., 85° C., 86° C., 87° C., 88° C., 89° C., 90° C., 91° C., 92° C., 93° C., 94° C., 95° C., 96° C., 97° C., 98° C., 99° C., or 100° C. In some examples, releasing target molecules from supports may comprise adding an elution agent to the supports and then heating the supports.
Target molecules released from supports may be further purified. For example, released target molecules (e.g., target nucleic acid molecules) and from the supports may be subjected to a solid phase reverse immobilization (SPRI) process. For example, released target molecules may be contacted with SPRI beads in a mixture under appropriate binding conditions such that the released target molecules bind to the SPRI beads. In a matter similar to that described elsewhere herein, the SPRI beads containing the bound target molecules may be subjected to an external magnetic field such that the SPRI beads are pulled towards the external magnetic field, thereby separating the SPRI beads from other components of the mixture. The SPRI beads may optionally undergo one or more washing steps as is discussed above. The target molecules can then be released from the SPRI beads via an elution agent and/or heating, as is discussed above.
It can be understood that further purification of one or more target molecules may be optional and can generally be based upon the level of purity desired for downstream applications. In some cases, a single round of purification may be sufficient. For example, a method may comprise binding target molecules to a single plurality of supports (e.g., magnetic particles such as Dynabeads), followed by separation/isolation and any washing of the supports. In some cases, it may be useful to combine a first round of purification and a second round of purification. For example, a method may comprise binding target molecules to a first plurality of supports (e.g., magnetic particles such as Dynabeads), followed by separation/isolation and any washing of the first supports; releasing the target molecules from the first supports; and subsequently binding the target molecules to a second plurality of supports (e.g., magnetic particles such as SPRI beads), followed by separation/isolation and any washing of the second supports. Additional rounds of purification need not be a SPRI process but may comprise any other steps that have been disclosed herein. Moreover, greater than two rounds of purification may be completed, including up to 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 or 20 rounds of purification or more.
As can be appreciated, the purification methods described herein may be used to purify one or more target molecules from any suitable type of partition or plurality of partitions, including non-droplet partitions. A suitable partition can be any partition from which the contents of the partition can be released and/o recovered. Non-limiting examples of such partitions include wells (e.g., microwells), microcapsules, tubes, containers, spots, microreactors, micelles and polymeric capsules. Moreover, the contents of a partition or a plurality of partitions may be released from the partitions and pooled into a pooled mixture. One or more target molecules may be recovered from the pooled mixture using one or more purification methods as described herein.
Further Processing and Analysis of Purified Target Molecules
Target molecules that have been recovered from droplets and purified can subject to further processing and/or analysis. In some cases, purification of target molecules can aid in performing cleaner or more efficient further processing of target molecules. For example, a purified target nucleic acid molecule may function as a template for an amplification reaction, such as polymerase chain reaction or other type of amplification reaction. One or more amplification reactions may be completed using the purified target nucleic acid molecules in order to provide an amplified number of target nucleic acid molecules. Such further processing may be particularly useful where recovered, purified nucleic acid molecules are initially present in low amounts and greater copy numbers are needed for downstream analysis. Moreover, one or more amplification reactions of purified target nucleic acid molecules may be completed in bulk and may be used to add one or more additional sequences (e.g., append additional nucleotides) to the purified target nucleic acid molecules. Such additional sequences can result in the generation of larger nucleic acid molecules (e.g., larger target nucleic acid molecules) and the one or more added sequences may be one or more functional sequences. Non-limiting examples of such functional sequences include a tag, a barcode sequence, an adapter sequence for sequence compatibility with a sequencing instrument/protocol (e.g., P5, P7 Illumina adaptor sequences), a primer (e.g., a random N-mer), a sequencing primer binding site, a sample index sequence, etc. Examples of adding additional sequences to nucleic acid molecules via an amplification reaction (including a bulk amplification reactions) are provided in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/316,383, filed Jun. 26, 2014 and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/102,420, filed Jan. 12, 2015, the full disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
In some cases, one or more additional sequences may be added to target nucleic acid molecules (or amplified target nucleic acid molecules) via a ligation process to generate larger target nucleic acid molecules. In some cases, the target nucleic acid molecules may be subject to a shearing process in order to generate one or more ends of the target nucleic acid molecules that are suitable for ligation with an additional nucleic acid sequence. The additional nucleic acid sequence may comprise one or more of any of the functional sequences described herein. Examples of shearing and ligation methods that can be used for adding additional sequences to nucleic acid molecules are provided in detail in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/102,420, filed Jan. 12, 2015, the full disclosure of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes. Upon addition of the additional sequence(s) to the target nucleic acid molecules, the larger sequences that are generated can be amplified to provide greater copy numbers. Shearing, ligation and any subsequent amplification can be performed in bulk.
Purified target nucleic acid molecules (that may or may not be further processed) or purified nucleic acid molecules to which one or more additional sequences have been appended (e.g., larger target nucleic acid molecules) may be subject to nucleic acid sequencing, whereby a sequence of the purified target nucleic acid molecules or larger target nucleic acid molecules is determined. The addition of additional functional sequences to purified target nucleic acid molecules may be useful in preparing target nucleic acid molecules for sequencing. Purified target nucleic acid molecules may be prepared for any suitable sequencing platform and sequenced, with appropriate functional sequences added to purified target nucleic acid molecules where needed. Sequencing may be performed via any suitable type of sequencing platform, with non-limiting examples that include Illumina, Ion Torrent, Pacific Biosciences SMRT, Roche 454 sequencing, SOLiD sequencing, etc. As can be appreciated, sequences obtained from nucleic acid molecules can be assembled into larger sequences from which the sequence of the nucleic acid molecules originated. In general, sequencing platforms make use of one or more algorithms to interpret sequencing data and reconstruct larger sequences.
Methods described herein can be used to prepare and sequence a nucleic acid molecule library. In some cases, a library of nucleic acid molecules can be generated, wherein the library comprises a plurality of droplets or other type of partitions comprising the nucleic acid molecules. Examples of preparing a library of nucleic acid molecules in partitions are provided in detail in e.g., U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/316,383, filed Jun. 26, 2014, U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/017,808, filed Jun. 26, 2014 and U.S. Provisional Patent Application 62/102,420, filed Jan. 12, 2015 (the full disclosures of which are incorporated by reference in their entireties for all purposes). Where the library of nucleic acid molecules comprises a plurality of droplets having the nucleic acid molecules, the plurality of droplets can be destabilized, thereby releasing the nucleic acid molecules from the plurality of droplets into a common pool. The nucleic acid molecules (e.g., target nucleic acid molecules) can be recovered/purified from the common pool using one or more of any of the purification methods described herein. The purified nucleic acid molecules can optionally be subject to further processing as described elsewhere herein and subject to sequencing, whereby the sequences of at least a subset of the purified nucleic acid molecules (or further processed purified nucleic acid molecules) can be determined. Sequencing may be performed via any suitable type of sequencing platform including example platforms described elsewhere herein.
Kits
The disclosure further provides for one or more kits. The one or more kits may comprise the reagents and/or devices sufficient for performing the methods provided in this disclosure. For example, the one or more kits may comprise the reagents and/or devices sufficient for purifying a target nucleic acid molecule from a droplet or other type of partition. Accordingly, the one or more kits may include one or more of the following reagents, without limitation: a destabilization agent, a chaotrope, a washing agent, an elution agent, and a support (e.g., a magnetic support). In some instances, the one or more kits may comprise a device (e.g., a magnetic device) for separating supports from a pooled mixture. In some cases, a kit may comprise reagents suitable for generating an emulsion. Non-limiting examples of such reagents include a continuous phase (e.g., oil) and an aqueous phase (e.g., a buffer). The one or more kits may further comprise packaging (i.e., a box). The reagents and the device may be packaged into a single kit. Alternatively, the reagents and the device may be packaged separately. The kits may further comprise instructions for usage of the kit. These instructions may be in the form of a paper document or booklet contained within the packaging of the kit. Alternatively, the instructions may be provided electronically (i.e., on the Internet).
The following examples are given for the purpose of illustrating various embodiments of the invention and are not meant to limit the present invention in any fashion. The present examples, along with the methods described herein are presently representative of preferred embodiments, are exemplary, and are not intended as limitations on the scope of the invention. Changes therein and other uses which are encompassed within the spirit of the invention as defined by the scope of the claims will occur to those skilled in the art.
180-200 μL of a mixture comprising 3.5 μg/μL silanized Dynabeads (Life Technologies) and a chaotropic salt (5.5 M), guanidine thiocyanate (GuSCN) were added to each tube and the mixtures were mixed via pipeting to bind target nucleic acid molecules to the Dynabeads (
The Dynabeads were washed with ethanol (EtOH) and the tubes removed from the device resulting in resuspension of the beads in the EtOH in each tube. After the EtOH wash, the magnetic device was flipped over and the strip of tubes was placed back into the device. At this second position of the device, the magnet sets were positioned at a “low” position. After another 4 minute incubation, the Dynabeads were pulled to bottom walls of the tubes (low position) (
The target nucleic acid molecules were optionally further processed with SPRI beads. In this optional step, the target nucleic acid molecules were contacted with SPRI beads in the presence of polyethylene glycol (PEG) to bind the target nucleic acid molecules to the SPRI beads. The SPRI beads underwent another round of magnetic separation and washing steps as described above. The target nucleic acid molecules were eluted from the SPRI beads and collected, subjected to further processing to add additional sequences suitable for Illumina sequencing and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 sequencer.
To test example one-step purification methods (e.g., purification with only one set of supports) versus an example two-step purification method (e.g., purification with a first set of supports, followed by further purification with a second set of supports), the example methods were compared side-by-side. 2 ng of 20 kb DNA was co-partitioned with barcoded polyacrylamide beads (e.g., beads comprising primers having a barcode sequence and a random N-mer primer sequence as described elsewhere herein) in aqueous droplets within a fluorinated oil continuous phase having a fluorosurfactant using a microfluidic partitioning system (See, e.g., U.S. Patent Application No. 61/977,804, filed Apr. 4, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes), where the aqueous droplets also included dNTPs, thermostable DNA polymerase and other reagents for carrying out amplification within the droplets, as well as a chemical activator (e.g., reducing agent) for releasing the barcode oligonucleotides from the beads.
Following bead dissolution (e.g., via disruption of disulfide bonds of the beads), the droplets were thermocycled to allow for primer extension of the barcode oligonucleotides against the template of the sample nucleic acids within each droplet. This resulted in the generation of barcoded copy fragments of the sample nucleic acids that included the barcode sequence representative of the originating partition, as described elsewhere herein. Four replicate samples of droplets having barcoded copy fragments were generated.
After generation of the barcoded copy fragments, the emulsion in each sample was destabilized with the addition of perfluorooctanol (PFO). This resulted in destabilization of the droplets and the generation of pooled mixture containing the contents of the droplets in each sample. Purification of the barcoded copy fragments from the pooled mixtures was performed using a magnetic device as described in Example 2 above and using 4 different purification methods, similar to those described in Example 2. Three of the methods (Method 1, Method 2, Method 3) included binding of barcoded copy fragments to varied amounts of single set of Dynabeads in a single purification step, whereas the fourth method included a two-step purification, whereby barcoded copy fragments were bound to a first set of Dynabeads, released and then bound to a second set of SPRI beads. Each of the four samples was processed with one of the four purification methods, where the amount of Dynabeads added was controlled by volume of Dynabead and chaotrope mixture (as in Example 2) added to pooled mixtures. A summary of the methods is as follows:
Purified barcoded copy fragments were analyzed for yield and those obtained from Methods 1 and 4 were subject to further processing to add appropriate adaptors to the purified barcoded copy fragments for Illumina Sequencing followed by whole genome sequencing (WGS) of the nucleic acid molecules on an Illumina sequencer. Data obtained from the experiments in shown in
To test an example one-step purification methods (e.g., purification with only one set of supports) versus an example two-step purification method (e.g., purification with a first set of supports, followed by further purification with a second set of supports), the example methods were compared side-by-side. 1 ng of 20 kb DNA was co-partitioned with barcoded polyacrylamide beads (e.g., beads comprising primers having a barcode sequence and a random N-mer primer sequence as described elsewhere herein) in aqueous droplets within a fluorinated oil continuous phase having a fluorosurfactant using a microfluidic partitioning system (See, e.g., U.S. Patent Application No. 61/977,804, filed Apr. 4, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes), where the aqueous droplets also included dNTPs, thermostable DNA polymerase and other reagents for carrying out amplification within the droplets, as well as a chemical activator (e.g., reducing agent) for releasing the barcode oligonucleotides from the beads.
Following bead dissolution (e.g., via disruption of disulfide bonds of the beads), the droplets were thermocycled to allow for primer extension of the barcode oligonucleotides against the template of the sample nucleic acids within each droplet. This resulted in the generation of barcoded copy fragments of the sample nucleic acids that included the barcode sequence representative of the originating partition, as described elsewhere herein. Six replicate samples of droplets having barcoded copy fragments were generated.
After generation of the barcoded copy fragments, the emulsion in each sample was destabilized with the addition of perfluorooctanol (PFO). This resulted in destabilization of the droplets and the generation of a pooled mixture containing the contents of the droplets for each sample. Purification of the barcoded copy fragments from the pooled mixtures was performed using a magnetic device as described in Example 2 above and using 3 different purification methods, similar to those described in Example 2. Two purification methods included binding of barcoded copy fragments to varied volumes of a single set of Dynabeads in a single purification step, whereas the third method included a two-step purification, whereby barcoded copy fragments were bound to a first set of Dynabeads, released and then bound to a second set of SPRI beads. Each of the six samples was processed with one of the three purification methods, where the amount of Dynabeads added was controlled by volume of Dynabead and chaotrope mixture (as in Example 2) added to pooled mixtures. A summary of the methods is as follows:
Purified barcoded copy fragments were analyzed for yield. Data obtained from the experiments in shown in
Genomic DNA from the NA12878 human cell line is subjected to size based separation of fragments using a Blue Pippin DNA sizing system to recover fragments that are approximately 10 kb in length. The size selected sample nucleic acids are then copartitioned with barcoded beads in aqueous droplets within a fluorinated oil continuous phase using a microfluidic partitioning system (See, e.g., U.S. Patent Application No. 61/977,804, filed Apr. 4, 2014, the full disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes), where the aqueous droplets also include dNTPs, thermostable DNA polymerase and other reagents for carrying out amplification within the droplets, as well as a chemical activator (e.g., a reducing agent) for releasing the barcode oligonucleotides from the beads. This is repeated both for 1 ng of total input DNA and 2 ng of total input DNA. The barcoded beads are obtained as a subset of a stock library that represents barcode diversity of over 700,000 different barcode sequences. The barcode containing oligonucleotides include additional sequence components and have the general structure:
Bead-P5-BC-R1-Nmer
Where P5 and R1 refer to the Illumina attachment and Read1 primer sequences, respectively, BC denotes the barcode portion of the oligonucleotide, and N-mer denotes a random N-mer priming sequence used to prime the template nucleic acids. See, e.g., U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/316,383, filed Jun. 26, 2014, the full disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
Following bead dissolution, the droplets are thermocycled to allow for primer extension of the barcode oligos against the template of the sample nucleic acids within each droplet. Thermocycling results in generation of barcoded copy fragments of the sample nucleic acids that include the barcode sequence representative of the originating partition, in addition to the other included sequences set forth above. Such an amplification reaction is described in more detail elsewhere herein.
After generation of the barcoded copy fragments, the emulsion of droplets including the barcoded copy fragments are destabilized with the addition of a perfluorooctanol (PFO). This results in a pooled mixture containing the contents of the droplets. The pooled mixture is contacted with Dynabeads MyOne Silane Beads (Life Technologies) in the presence of guanidine thiocyanate (GuSCN) to promote the binding of the barcoded copy fragments to the Dynabeads. The vessel containing the pooled mixture is placed into the holder of a magnetic device such that the Dynabeads are pulled to the wall of the vessel. The supernatant is removed and the Dynabeads are washed with 70% ethanol and vortexed to mix. The device is then flipped over and the vessel containing the pooled mixture is placed into the holder of the magnetic device such that the Dynabeads are pulled to the bottom of the vessel. The supernatant (washing agent) is removed. An elution agent is added to the Dynabeads and the mixture is heated to 65° C. to elute the amplified fragments off of the Dynabeads. The eluted barcoded copy fragments are collected, further processed to add any additional functional sequences desired and/or necessary for Illumina sequencing and sequenced on an Illumina sequencer.
In some cases, prior to further processing, the eluted barcoded copy fragments are collected and further purified by contacting the eluted barcoded copy fragments with SPRI beads (Beckman-Coulter) in the presence of polyethylene glycol (PEG) such that the eluted barcoded copy fragments bind to the SPRI beads. The SPRI beads undergo another round of separating (magnetic), washing, separating, and eluting to provide further purified barcoded copy fragments. Following further purification the further purified barcoded copy fragments can be further processed to add any additional sequences desired and/or necessary for Illumina sequencing and sequenced on an Illumina sequencer.
While preferred embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described herein, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. Numerous variations, changes, and substitutions will now occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the invention. It should be understood that various alternatives to the embodiments of the invention described herein may be employed in practicing the invention. It is intended that the following claims define the scope of the invention and that methods and structures within the scope of these claims and their equivalents be covered thereby.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2797149 | Skeggs | Jun 1957 | A |
3047367 | Kessler | Jul 1962 | A |
3479141 | Smythe et al. | Nov 1969 | A |
4124638 | Hansen | Nov 1978 | A |
4253846 | Smythe et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4582802 | Zimmerman et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4895650 | Wang | Jan 1990 | A |
5137829 | Nag et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5149625 | Church et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5185099 | Delpuech et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5202231 | Drmanac et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5270183 | Corbett et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5413924 | Kosak et al. | May 1995 | A |
5418149 | Gelfand et al. | May 1995 | A |
5436130 | Mathies et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5478893 | Ghosh et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5489523 | Mathur | Feb 1996 | A |
5512131 | Kumar et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5558071 | Ward et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5585069 | Zanzucchi et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5587128 | Wilding et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5605793 | Stemmer | Feb 1997 | A |
5618711 | Gelfand et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5658548 | Padhye et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5695940 | Drmanac et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5700642 | Monforte et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5705628 | Hawkins | Jan 1998 | A |
5708153 | Dower et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5736330 | Fulton | Apr 1998 | A |
5739036 | Parris | Apr 1998 | A |
5744311 | Fraiser et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5756334 | Perler et al. | May 1998 | A |
5830663 | Embleton et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5834197 | Parton | Nov 1998 | A |
5842787 | Kopf-Sill et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5846719 | Brenner et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5846727 | Soper et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5851769 | Gray et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5856174 | Lipshutz et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5872010 | Karger et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5897783 | Howe et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5900481 | Lough et al. | May 1999 | A |
5942609 | Hunkapiller et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5958703 | Dower et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5965443 | Reznikoff et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5994056 | Higuchi | Nov 1999 | A |
5997636 | Gamarnik et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6033880 | Haff et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6046003 | Mandecki | Apr 2000 | A |
6051377 | Mandecki | Apr 2000 | A |
6057107 | Fulton | May 2000 | A |
6057149 | Burns et al. | May 2000 | A |
6103537 | Ullman et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6110678 | Weisburg et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6123798 | Gandhi et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6133436 | Koster et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6143496 | Brown et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6159717 | Savakis et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6171850 | Nagle et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6172218 | Brenner | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6207384 | Mekalanos et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6258571 | Chumakov et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6265552 | Schatz | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6291243 | Fogarty et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6294385 | Goryshin et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6296020 | McNeely et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6297006 | Drmanac et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6297017 | Schmidt et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6303343 | Kopf-Sill | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306590 | Mehta et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6327410 | Walt et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6355198 | Kim et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361950 | Mandecki | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6372813 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379929 | Burns et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6406848 | Bridgham et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409832 | Weigl et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6432290 | Harrison et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6432360 | Church | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6485944 | Church et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6492118 | Abrams et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6511803 | Church et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6524456 | Ramsey et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6569631 | Pantoliano et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6579851 | Goeke et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6586176 | Trnovsky et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6593113 | Tenkanen et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6613752 | Kay et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6632606 | Ullman et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6632655 | Mehta et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6670133 | Knapp et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6723513 | Lexow | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6767731 | Hannah | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6800298 | Burdick et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6806052 | Bridgham et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6806058 | Jesperson et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6859570 | Walt et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6880576 | Karp et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6884788 | Bulpitt et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6913935 | Thomas | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6929859 | Chandler et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6969488 | Bridgham et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6974669 | Mirkin et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7041481 | Anderson et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7115400 | Adessi et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7129091 | Ismagilov et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7138267 | Jendrisak et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7211654 | Gao et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7262056 | Wooddell et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7268167 | Higuchi et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7282370 | Bridgham et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7294503 | Quake et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7297485 | Bornarth et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7316903 | Yanagihara et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7323305 | Leamon et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7329493 | Chou et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7425431 | Church et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7536928 | Kazuno | May 2009 | B2 |
7544473 | Brenner | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7604938 | Takahashi et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7608434 | Reznikoff et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7608451 | Cooper et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7622280 | Holliger et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7638276 | Griffiths et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7645596 | Williams et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7666664 | Sarofim et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7700325 | Cantor et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7708949 | Stone et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7709197 | Drmanac | May 2010 | B2 |
7718421 | Chen et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7745178 | Dong | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7745218 | Kim et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7776927 | Chu et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
RE41780 | Anderson et al. | Sep 2010 | E |
7799553 | Mathies et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7842457 | Berka et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7901891 | Drmanac | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7910354 | Drmanac et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7947477 | Schroeder | May 2011 | B2 |
7960104 | Drmanac et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7968287 | Griffiths et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7972778 | Brown et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8003312 | Krutzik et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8008018 | Quake et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8053192 | Bignell et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8067159 | Brown et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8101346 | Takahama | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8124404 | Alphey | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8133719 | Drmanac et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8137563 | Ma et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8168385 | Brenner | May 2012 | B2 |
8252539 | Quake et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8268564 | Roth et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8273573 | Ismagilov et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8278071 | Brown et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8298767 | Brenner et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8304193 | Ismagilov et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8318433 | Brenner | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8318460 | Cantor et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8329407 | Ismagilov et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8337778 | Stone et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8361299 | Sabin et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8420386 | Ivies et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8461129 | Bolduc et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8563274 | Brenner et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8592150 | Drmanac et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8598328 | Koga et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8603749 | Gillevet | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8679756 | Brenner et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8748094 | Weitz et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8748102 | Berka et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8765380 | Berka et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8822148 | Ismagilov et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8829171 | Steemers et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8835358 | Fodor et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8871444 | Griffiths et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8889083 | Ismagilov et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8927218 | Forsyth | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8975302 | Light et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8986286 | Tanghoej et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8986628 | Stone et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9005935 | Belyaev | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9012390 | Holtze et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9017948 | Agresti et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9029083 | Griffiths et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9029085 | Agresti et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9040256 | Grunenwald et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9068210 | Agresti et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9074251 | Steemers et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9080211 | Grunenwald et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9102980 | Brenner et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9150916 | Christen et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9175295 | Kaminaka et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9238671 | Goryshin et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9249460 | Pushkarev et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9273349 | Nguyen et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9290808 | Fodor et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9328382 | Drmanac et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9347056 | Saito et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9347059 | Saxonov | May 2016 | B2 |
9388465 | Hindson et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9410201 | Hindson et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9436088 | Seul et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9567631 | Hindson et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9574226 | Gormley et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9637799 | Fan et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9644204 | Hindson et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9689024 | Hindson et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9694361 | Bharadwaj et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9695468 | Hindson et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9701998 | Hindson et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9856530 | Hindson et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9951386 | Hindson et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9957558 | Leamon et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10011872 | Belgrader et al. | Jul 2018 | B1 |
10017759 | Kaper et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10030267 | Hindson et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10041116 | Hindson et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10053723 | Hindson et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10059989 | Giresi et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10071377 | Bharadwaj et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10119167 | Srinivasan et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10137449 | Bharadwaj et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10144950 | Nolan | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10150117 | Bharadwaj et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10150963 | Hindson et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10150964 | Hindson et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10150995 | Giresi et al. | Dec 2018 | B1 |
10174310 | Nolan | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10208343 | Hindson et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10221436 | Hardenbol et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10221442 | Hindson et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10227648 | Hindson et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10253364 | Hindson et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10273541 | Hindson et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10441957 | Park | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10697000 | Belgrader et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
20010020588 | Adourian et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010036669 | Jedrzejewski et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010041357 | Fouillet et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010044109 | Mandecki | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010048900 | Bardell et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010053519 | Fodor et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020001856 | Chow et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020005354 | Spence et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020034737 | Drmanac | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020043463 | Shenderov | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020051971 | Stuelpnagel et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020051992 | Bridgham et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020058332 | Quake et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065609 | Ashby | May 2002 | A1 |
20020068278 | Giese et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020089100 | Kawasaki | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020092767 | Bjornson et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020113009 | O'Connor et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020119455 | Chan | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020119536 | Stern | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020131147 | Paolini et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020160518 | Hayenga et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020164820 | Brown | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020166582 | O'Connor et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020172965 | Kamb et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020175079 | Christel et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020179849 | Maher et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030005967 | Karp | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030007898 | Bohm et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030008285 | Fischer | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030008323 | Ravkin et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030022231 | Wangh et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030027203 | Fields | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030027214 | Kamb | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030027221 | Scott et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030028981 | Chandler et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030032141 | Nguyen et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030036206 | Chien et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030039978 | Hannah | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030044777 | Beattie | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030044836 | Levine et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030075446 | Culbertson et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030082587 | Seul et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030089605 | Timperman | May 2003 | A1 |
20030104466 | Knapp et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030108897 | Drmanac | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030124509 | Kenis et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149307 | Hai et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030170698 | Gascoyne et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182068 | Battersby et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030207260 | Trnovsky et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030215862 | Parce et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040040851 | Karger et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040063138 | McGinnis et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040081962 | Chen et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040101680 | Barber | May 2004 | A1 |
20040101880 | Rozwadowski et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040132122 | Banerjee et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040214175 | McKernan et al. | Oct 2004 | A9 |
20040224331 | Cantor et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040258701 | Dominowski et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050013741 | a' Brassard | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050019839 | Jespersen et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050042625 | Schmidt et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050079510 | Berka et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050130188 | Walt et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050172476 | Stone et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050181379 | Su et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050202429 | Trau et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050202489 | Cho et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050221339 | Griffiths et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050244850 | Huang et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050272159 | Ismagilov et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050287572 | Mathies et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060002890 | Hersel et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060008799 | Cai et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020371 | Ham et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060040382 | Heffron et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060073487 | Oliver et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060078888 | Griffiths et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060153924 | Griffiths et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060163385 | Link et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060177832 | Brenner | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060177833 | Brenner | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060199193 | Koo et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060240506 | Kushmaro et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060257893 | Takahashi et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060263888 | Fritz et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060275782 | Gunderson et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060286570 | Rowlen et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060292583 | Schneider et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070003442 | Link et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070020617 | Trnovsky et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070020640 | McCloskey et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070026401 | Hofmann et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070031829 | Yasuno et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070042400 | Choi et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070042419 | Barany et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070054119 | Garstecki et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070072208 | Drmanac | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070077572 | Tawfik et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070092914 | Griffiths et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070099208 | Drmanac et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070134277 | Chen et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070141584 | Roberts et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070154903 | Marla et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070160503 | Sethu et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070172873 | Brenner et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070190543 | Livak | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070195127 | Ahn et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070207060 | Zou et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070228588 | Noritomi et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070231823 | McKernan et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070238113 | Kanda et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070259357 | Brenner | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070264320 | Lee et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080003142 | Link et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080004436 | Tawfik et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080014589 | Link et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080124726 | Monforte | May 2008 | A1 |
20080138878 | Kubu et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080213766 | Brown et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228268 | Shannon et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080241820 | Krutzik et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080242560 | Gunderson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080268450 | Nam et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080268507 | Xu et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090005252 | Drmanac et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090011943 | Drmanac et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090012187 | Chu et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090025277 | Takanashi | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090035770 | Mathies et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090048124 | Leamon et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090053169 | Castillo et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090062129 | McKernan et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090068170 | Weitz et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090098555 | Roth et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090099041 | Church et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090105959 | Braverman et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090118488 | Drmanac et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090134027 | Jary | May 2009 | A1 |
20090137404 | Drmanac et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090137414 | Drmanac et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090143244 | Bridgham et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090148961 | Luchini et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090155780 | Xiao et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090155781 | Drmanac et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090197248 | Griffiths et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090197772 | Griffiths et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090202984 | Cantor | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090203531 | Kurn | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090264299 | Drmanac et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090286687 | Dressman et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090325260 | Otto et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100021973 | Makarov et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100021984 | Edd et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100022414 | Link et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100035254 | Williams | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100062494 | Church et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100069263 | Shendure et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100086914 | Bentley et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100105112 | Holtze et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100113296 | Myerson | May 2010 | A1 |
20100120098 | Grunenwald et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100130369 | Shenderov et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100136544 | Agresti et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100137163 | Link et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100173394 | Colston, Jr. et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100187705 | Lee et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100210479 | Griffiths et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100216153 | Lapidus et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100248237 | Froehlich et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100248991 | Roesler et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100304982 | Hinz et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110000560 | Miller et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110008775 | Gao et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110028412 | Cappello et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110033548 | Lai et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110033854 | Drmanac et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110053798 | Hindson et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110059556 | Strey et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110071053 | Drmanac et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110086780 | Colston, Jr. et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110092376 | Colston, Jr. et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110092392 | Colston, Jr. et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110160078 | Fodor et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110166034 | Kwong et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110195496 | Muraguchi et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110201526 | Berka et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110212090 | Pedersen et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110217736 | Hindson | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110218123 | Weitz et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110263457 | Krutzik et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110267457 | Weitz et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110281736 | Drmanac et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110281738 | Drmanac et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110287435 | Grunenwald et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110305761 | Shum et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110306141 | Bronchetti et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110319281 | Drmanac | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120000777 | Garrell et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120003657 | Myllykangas et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120010091 | Linnarson | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120010098 | Griffiths et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120010107 | Griffiths et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120014977 | Furihata et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120015382 | Weitz et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120015822 | Weitz et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120071331 | Casbon et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120121481 | Romanowsky et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120132288 | Weitz et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120135893 | Drmanac et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120165219 | Van Der Zaag et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120172259 | Rigatti et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120184449 | Hixson et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120190032 | Ness et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120190037 | Durin et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120196288 | Beer | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120208705 | Steemers et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120208724 | Steemers et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120211084 | Weitz et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120220494 | Samuels et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120220497 | Jacobson et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120222748 | Weitz et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120231972 | Golyshin et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120252012 | Armougom et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120253689 | Rogan | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120289428 | Duffy et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120297493 | Cooper et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120309002 | Link | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120316074 | Saxonov | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130017978 | Kavanagh et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130018970 | Woundy et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130022682 | Lee et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130028812 | Prieto et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130041004 | Drager et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130046030 | Rotem et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130059310 | Brenner et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130078638 | Berka et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130079231 | Pushkarev et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130079251 | Boles | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130084243 | Goetsch et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130096073 | Sidelman | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130109575 | Kleinschmidt et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130109576 | Shuber et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130109596 | Peterson et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130121893 | Delamarche et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130130919 | Chen et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130157870 | Pushkarev et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130157899 | Adler, Jr. et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130178368 | Griffiths et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130189700 | So et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130203605 | Shendure et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130203675 | DeSimone et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130210639 | Link et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130210991 | Fonnum et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130211055 | Raines et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130225418 | Watson | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130225623 | Buxbaum et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130273640 | Krishnan et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130274117 | Church et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130296173 | Callow et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130343317 | Etemad et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130344508 | Schwartz et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140030350 | Ashrafi et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140037514 | Stone et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140038178 | Otto et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140057799 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140065234 | Shum et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140080717 | Li et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140093916 | Belyaev | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140120529 | Andersen et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140155274 | Xie et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140155295 | Hindson et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140194323 | Gillevet | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140199730 | Agresti et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140199731 | Agresti et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140206554 | Hindson et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140227684 | Hindson et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140227706 | Kato et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140228255 | Hindson et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140235506 | Hindson et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140242664 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140274740 | Srinivasan et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140287963 | Hindson et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140302503 | Lowe et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140315725 | Faham et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140315755 | Chen et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140357500 | Vigneault et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140378322 | Hindson et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140378345 | Hindson et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140378349 | Hindson et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140378350 | Hindson et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150005188 | Levner et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150005199 | Hindson et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150005200 | Hindson et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150011430 | Saxonov | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150011432 | Saxonov | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150031037 | Li et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150057163 | Rotem et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150072899 | Ward et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150111256 | Church et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150111788 | Fernandez et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150119280 | Srinivas et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150211056 | Um et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150218633 | Hindson et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150224466 | Hindson et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150225777 | Hindson et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150225778 | Hindson et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150225786 | Litterst et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150247182 | Faham et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150259736 | Steemers et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150267191 | Steelman et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150291942 | Gloeckner et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150292988 | Bharadwaj et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150298091 | Weitz et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150299772 | Zhang | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150299784 | Fan et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150329617 | Winther et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150329852 | Nolan | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150329891 | Tan et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150337298 | Xi et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150353999 | Agresti et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150361418 | Reed | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150368638 | Steemers et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150368694 | Pan et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150376605 | Jarosz et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150376608 | Kaper et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150376609 | Hindson et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150376700 | Schnall-Levin et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150379196 | Schnall-Levin et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160024558 | Hardenbol et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160025726 | Altin et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160032282 | Vigneault et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160053253 | Salathia et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160060621 | Agresti et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160060691 | Giresi et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160115474 | Jelinek et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160122753 | Mikkelsen et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160122817 | Jarosz et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160145683 | Fan et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160153005 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160160235 | Solodushko et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160177359 | Ukanis et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160201125 | Samuels et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160208323 | Bernstein et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160231324 | Zhao et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160244742 | Linnarsson et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160244811 | Edwards | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160244825 | Vigneault et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160251697 | Nolan | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160257984 | Hardenbol et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160281160 | Jarosz et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160289769 | Schwartz et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160298107 | O'Farrell et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160304860 | Hindson et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160326583 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160348093 | Price et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160376663 | Brown | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170009274 | Abate et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170016041 | Greenfield et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170114390 | Hindson et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170145476 | Ryvkin et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170183701 | Agresti et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170211127 | Mikkelsen et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170260584 | Zheng et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170268056 | Vigneault et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170321252 | Hindson et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170343545 | Hadrup et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170348691 | Bharadwaj et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170356027 | Hindson et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180015473 | Bharadwaj et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180030515 | Regev et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180057868 | Walder et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180080021 | Reuter et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180087050 | Zheng et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180088112 | Fan et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180112253 | Hindson et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180179580 | Hindson et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180179591 | Belgrader et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180180601 | Pedersen et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180195060 | Wang et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180195112 | Lebofsky et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180216162 | Belhocine et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180237951 | Bock et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180258466 | Hindson et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180258482 | Hindson et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180265928 | Schnall-Levin et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180267036 | Fan et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180273933 | Gunderson et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180274027 | Hindson et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180282804 | Hindson et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180305685 | Li et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180327839 | Hindson et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180335424 | Chen et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180340169 | Belhocine et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180340170 | Belhocine et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180340171 | Belhocine et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180340172 | Belhocine et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180340939 | Gaublomme et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180346979 | Hindson et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180363029 | Hindson et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180371538 | Blauwkamp et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180371540 | Hindson et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180376609 | Ju et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190002967 | Chen et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190024166 | Hindson et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190032129 | Hindson et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190032130 | Giresi et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190040382 | Steemers et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190040464 | Giresi et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190071656 | Chang et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190078150 | Chen et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190085391 | Hindson et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190127731 | McDermott | May 2019 | A1 |
20190136316 | Hindson et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190136317 | Hindson et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190136319 | Hindson et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190153436 | Belhocine et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190153532 | Bharadwaj et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102292455 | Dec 2011 | CN |
103202812 | Jul 2013 | CN |
0249007 | Dec 1987 | EP |
0271281 | Jun 1988 | EP |
0637996 | Jul 1997 | EP |
1019496 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1672064 | Jun 2006 | EP |
1482036 | Oct 2007 | EP |
1841879 | Oct 2007 | EP |
1944368 | Jul 2008 | EP |
1594980 | Nov 2009 | EP |
1967592 | Apr 2010 | EP |
2258846 | Dec 2010 | EP |
2145955 | Feb 2012 | EP |
1905828 | Aug 2012 | EP |
2136786 | Oct 2012 | EP |
1908832 | Dec 2012 | EP |
2540389 | Jan 2013 | EP |
2635679 | Sep 2013 | EP |
2752664 | Jul 2014 | EP |
2097692 | May 1985 | GB |
2485850 | May 2012 | GB |
S5949832 | Mar 1984 | JP |
S60227826 | Nov 1985 | JP |
2006-507921 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2006-289250 | Oct 2006 | JP |
2007-015990 | Jan 2007 | JP |
2007-268350 | Oct 2007 | JP |
2009-513948 | Apr 2009 | JP |
2009-208074 | Sep 2009 | JP |
2012-131798 | Jul 2012 | JP |
2012522517 | Sep 2012 | JP |
WO-8402000 | May 1984 | WO |
WO-9301498 | Jan 1993 | WO |
WO-9418218 | Aug 1994 | WO |
WO-9419101 | Sep 1994 | WO |
WO-9423699 | Oct 1994 | WO |
WO-9530782 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO-9629629 | Sep 1996 | WO |
WO-9641011 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO-9802237 | Jan 1998 | WO |
WO-9852691 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO-9909217 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO-9942597 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO-9952708 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO-2000008212 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO-0023181 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO-0026412 | May 2000 | WO |
WO-0034527 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO-0043766 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO-0070095 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO-0102850 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO-0114589 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO-0189787 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO-0190418 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO-0127610 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO-0231203 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO-02086148 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO-0218949 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO-03062462 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO-2004002627 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO-2004010106 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO-2004061083 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO-2004065617 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO-2004069849 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO-2004091763 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO-2004102204 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO-2004103565 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO-2004105734 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO-2005002730 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO-2005021151 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO-2005023331 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO-2005040406 | May 2005 | WO |
WO-2005049787 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO-2005082098 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO-2006030993 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO-2006078841 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO-2006071770 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO-2006086210 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO-2006096571 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO-2007001448 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO-2007002490 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO-2007012638 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO-2007018601 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO-2007024840 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO-2007081387 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO-2007084192 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO-2007089541 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO-2007093819 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO-2007111937 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO-2007114794 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO-2007121489 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO-2007133710 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO-2007138178 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO-2007139766 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO-2007140015 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO-2007147079 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO-2007149432 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO-2008021123 | Feb 2008 | WO |
WO-2008091792 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO-2008102057 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO-2008121342 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO-2007081385 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO-2008061193 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO-2008109176 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO-2008134153 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO-2008135512 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO-2008150432 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO-2009005680 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO-2009011808 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO-2009015296 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO-2009048532 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO-2009061372 | May 2009 | WO |
WO-2009085215 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO-2009147386 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO-2010004018 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO-2010009735 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO-2010033200 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO-2010048605 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO-2010104604 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO-2010115154 | Oct 2010 | WO |
WO-2010148039 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO-2010151776 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO-2010117620 | Feb 2011 | WO |
WO-2011028539 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO-2011047870 | Apr 2011 | WO |
WO-2011056546 | May 2011 | WO |
WO-2011074960 | Jun 2011 | WO |
WO-2011106314 | Sep 2011 | WO |
WO-2011140627 | Nov 2011 | WO |
WO-2011156529 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO-2012012037 | Jan 2012 | WO |
WO-2012019765 | Feb 2012 | WO |
WO-2011140510 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO-2012047889 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO-2012048340 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO-2012048341 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO-2012061832 | May 2012 | WO |
WO-2012087736 | Jun 2012 | WO |
WO-2011066476 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO-2012106546 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO-2012112804 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO-2012112970 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO-2012083225 | Sep 2012 | WO |
WO-2012136734 | Oct 2012 | WO |
WO-2012142611 | Oct 2012 | WO |
WO-2012148497 | Nov 2012 | WO |
WO-2012149042 | Nov 2012 | WO |
WO-2012150317 | Nov 2012 | WO |
WO-2012166425 | Dec 2012 | WO |
WO-2013019751 | Feb 2013 | WO |
WO-2013036929 | Mar 2013 | WO |
WO-2013055955 | Apr 2013 | WO |
WO-2013096643 | Jun 2013 | WO |
WO-2013122996 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO-2013123125 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO-2013126741 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO-2013134261 | Sep 2013 | WO |
WO-2013150083 | Oct 2013 | WO |
WO-2013177220 | Nov 2013 | WO |
WO-2013188872 | Dec 2013 | WO |
WO-2014018460 | Jan 2014 | WO |
WO-2014028537 | Feb 2014 | WO |
WO-2014053854 | Apr 2014 | WO |
WO-2014071361 | May 2014 | WO |
WO-2014074611 | May 2014 | WO |
WO-2014072703 | May 2014 | WO |
WO-2014093676 | Jun 2014 | WO |
WO-2014108810 | Jul 2014 | WO |
WO-2014140309 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO-2014144495 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO-2014150931 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO-2014145047 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO-2014182835 | Nov 2014 | WO |
WO-2014189957 | Nov 2014 | WO |
WO-2014210353 | Dec 2014 | WO |
WO-2014200767 | Dec 2014 | WO |
WO-2015031691 | Mar 2015 | WO |
WO-2015044428 | Apr 2015 | WO |
WO-2015164212 | Oct 2015 | WO |
WO-2015188839 | Dec 2015 | WO |
WO-2015200893 | Dec 2015 | WO |
WO-2015185067 | Dec 2015 | WO |
WO-2016040476 | Mar 2016 | WO |
WO-2016061517 | Apr 2016 | WO |
WO-2016033251 | Apr 2016 | WO |
WO-2016100976 | Jun 2016 | WO |
WO-2016126871 | Aug 2016 | WO |
WO-2016138496 | Sep 2016 | WO |
WO-2016149661 | Sep 2016 | WO |
WO-2016168584 | Oct 2016 | WO |
WO-2016187256 | Nov 2016 | WO |
WO-2016187717 | Dec 2016 | WO |
WO-2016191618 | Dec 2016 | WO |
WO-2016207647 | Dec 2016 | WO |
WO-2016207653 | Dec 2016 | WO |
WO-2016207661 | Dec 2016 | WO |
WO-2017015075 | Jan 2017 | WO |
WO-2017025594 | Feb 2017 | WO |
WO-2017053905 | Mar 2017 | WO |
WO-2017034970 | Mar 2017 | WO |
WO-2017075265 | May 2017 | WO |
WO-2017075294 | May 2017 | WO |
WO-2017079593 | May 2017 | WO |
WO-2017096158 | Jun 2017 | WO |
WO-2017117358 | Jul 2017 | WO |
WO-2017151828 | Sep 2017 | WO |
WO-2017156336 | Sep 2017 | WO |
WO-2017180420 | Oct 2017 | WO |
WO-2018031631 | Feb 2018 | WO |
WO-2018045186 | Mar 2018 | WO |
WO-2018039969 | Mar 2018 | WO |
WO-2018058073 | Mar 2018 | WO |
WO-2018119301 | Jun 2018 | WO |
WO-2018103025 | Jun 2018 | WO |
WO-2018119447 | Jun 2018 | WO |
WO-2018125982 | Jul 2018 | WO |
WO-2018129368 | Jul 2018 | WO |
WO-2018132635 | Jul 2018 | WO |
WO-2018172726 | Sep 2018 | WO |
WO-2018174827 | Sep 2018 | WO |
WO-2018191701 | Oct 2018 | WO |
WO-2019028166 | Feb 2019 | WO |
WO-2019084328 | May 2019 | WO |
WO-2019099751 | May 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Burger et al, Novel Automated Blood Separations Validate Whole Cell Biomarkers, 2011, 6, e22430, pp. 1-11 (Year: 2011). |
“BD Rhapsody™ Single-Cell Analysis System: Analyze hundreds of genes across tens of thousands of single cells in parallel,” BD, Becton, Dickinson and Company. BDGM1012 Rev. 1 (2017) (8 pages). |
“Determining the elastic modulus of biological samples using atomic force microscopy,” Broker JPK BIOAFM, <https://www.jpk.com/ app-technotes-img/AFM/pdf/jpk-app-elastic-modulus.14-1.pdf> (2009) (9 pages). |
“Droplet Based Sequencing,” slides dated Mar. 12, 2008. |
“EZ-Tn5 Transposase,” Epicenter. 1-5 (2012). |
“EZ-Tn5TM Custom Transposome Construction Kits,” Epicentre. 1-17 (2012). |
“How many species of bacteria are there?” WiseGeek, retrieved Jan. 21, 2014. |
“List of sequenced bacterial genomes” (Wikipedia.com; accessed Jan. 24, 2014). |
“Oligo(dT)25 cellulose beads,” NEB, <https://www.neb.com/˜/media/Catalog/All-Products/286CA51268E24DE1B06F1CB288698B54/Datacards%20or%Manuals/S1408Datasheet-Lot0011205.pdf>, dated 2012. |
“Oligotex Handbook,” Qiagen XP055314680, <URL:http://www.qiagen.com/de/resources/download.apsx?id=f9fald98-d54d-47e7-a20b-8b0cb8975009&lang=en>, dated 2012. |
“Portable Water Filters” (http://www.portablewaterfilters.org/water-filter-quide/particle-contaminant-size-chart-microns/) 2015, accessed Oct. 19, 2017. |
“Protocols, M-270 Streptavidin,” ThermoFisherScientific. (2007) (5 pages). |
“U.S. Appl. No. 61/982,001, filed Apr. 21, 2014 (Year:2014)”. |
“Spormann Laboratory, Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR),” Alfred Spormann Laboratory. 1-3 (2009). |
“Streptavidin-agarose (S1638) product information sheet,” Sigma, <www.sigma-aldrich.com>. |
“TCEP=HCI,” Thermo Scientific, XP055508461, <https://assets.thermofisher.com/TFS-Assets/LSG/manuals/MAN0011306_TCEP_HCI_UG.pdf>, dated Dec. 31, 2013. |
“Three Ways to Get Intimate with Epigenetic Marks,” Epigenie, <https://epigenie.com/three-ways-to-get-intimate-with-epigenetic-marks/>, dated Oct. 24, 2012. |
“Viscosity-Basic concepts,” EPFL, XP055314117, <http://lhtc.epfl.ch/webdav/site/lhtc/shared/import/migration/2 VISCOSITY.pdf>, dated 2004. |
10X Genomics. “10x Genomics Chromium™ Single Cell 3′ Solution Utilized for Perturb-seq Approach,” Press Release, <https://www.10xgenomics.com/news/10x-genomics-chromium-single-cell-3-solution-utilized- perturb-seq-approach/>, dated_Dec. 19, 2016. |
Abate et al., “Beating Poisson encapsulation statistics using close-packed ordering,” Lab Chip. 9(18):2628-31 (2009). |
Abate et al., “Valve-based flow focusing for drop formation,” Appl Phys Lett. 94 (2009) (3 pages). |
Abate, et al. High-throughput injection with microfluidics using picoinjectors. Proc Natl Acad Sci US A. Nov. 9, 2010;107(45):19163-6. doi: 10.1073/pNas.1006888107. Epub Oct. 20, 2010. |
Adamson et al., “Production of arrays of chemically distinct nanolitre plugs via repeated splitting in microfluidic devices,” Lab Chip. 6(9): 1178-1186 (2006). |
Adamson, et al. A Multiplexed Single-Cell CRISPR Screening Platform Enables Systematic Dissection of the Unfolded Protein Response. Cell. Dec. 15, 2016;167(7):1867-1882.e21. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.048. |
Adey et al. “Rapid, low-input, low-bias construction of shotgun fragment libraries by high-density in vitro transposition,” Genome Biology. 11:R119 (2010). |
Adey et al., “Ultra-low-input, tagmentation-based whole-genome bisulfite sequencing,” Genome Research. 22(6): 1139-1143 (2012). |
Agasti et al. “Photocleavable DNA barcode-antibody conjugates allow sensitive and multiplexed protein analysis in single cells,” J Amer Chem Soc. 134(45): 18499-18502 (2012). |
Agresti, et al. Selection of ribozymes that catalyse multiple-turnover Diels-Alder cycloadditions by using in vitro compartmentalization. Proc Natl Acad Sci US A. Nov. 8, 2005;102(45):16170-5. Epub Oct. 31, 2005. |
AH006633.3 (Homo sapiens clone P1 and PAC max interactor 1 (MXI1) gene, complete cds, NCBI Reference Sequence, priority to Jun. 10, 2016, 5 pages) (Year:2016). |
Ahern, “Biochemical, Reagents Kits Offer Scientists Good Return on Investment,” The Scientist.9(15):1-7 (1995). |
Ahern, The Scientist. 20: 20, 22 (1995). |
Ailenberg et al., “Controlled Hot Start and Improved Specificity in Carrying Out PCR Utilizing Touch-Up and Loop Incorporated Primers (TULIPS),” BioTechniques. 29:1018-1024 (2000). |
Aitman et al., “Copy number polymorphism in Fcgr3 predisposes to glomerulonephritis in rats and humans,” Nature. 439(7078):851-5 (2006). |
Akselband, “Enrichment of slow-growing marine microorganisms from mixed cultures using gel microdrop (GMD) growth assay and fluorescence-activated cell sorting,” J Exp Marine Biol. 329:196-205 (2006). |
Akselband, “Rapid mycobacteria drug susceptibility testing using gel microdrop (GMD) growth assay and flow cytometry,” J Microbiol Methods. 62: 181-197 (2005). |
Altemose et al., “Genomic Characterization of Large Heterochromatic Gaps in the Human Genome Assembly,” PLOS Computational PLoS Comput Biol. 10(5) (2014) (14 pages). |
Amini et al. “Haplotype-resolved whole-genome sequencing by contiguity-preserving transposition and combinatorial indexing” Nat Genet. 46(12):1343-1349 (2014). |
Anna et al., “Formation of dispersions using ‘flow focusing’ in microchannels,” Appln Phys Letts. 82(3): 364 (2003). |
Anonymous: “Dynal MPC(TM)-S”, Oct. 13, 2008 (Oct. 13, 2008), XP055603532, Retrieved from the Internet on Jul. 9, 2019; URL:<https://www.veritastk.co.jp/products/pdf/120%2020D.Dynal_MPC-S%28rev005%29.pdf>. |
Ason et al. “DNA sequence bias during Tn5 transposition. Journal of molecular biology” J Mol Biol. 335(5):12-13-25 (2004). |
Attia et al., “Micro-injection moulding of polymer microfluidic devices,” Microfluidics and Nanofluidics. 7(1):1-28 (2009). |
Balikova et al. “Autosomal-dominant microtia linked to five tandem copies of a copy-number-variable region at chromosome 4p16,” Am J Hum Genet. 82(1):181-7 (2008). |
Banchelli et al., “Phospholipid membranes decorated by cholesterol-based oligonucleotides as soft hybrid nanostructures,” J Phys Chem B. 112(35): 10942-52 (2008). |
Baret et al., “Fluorescence-activated droplet sorting (FADS): efficient microfluidic cell sorting based on enzymatic activity,” Lab Chip. 9(13):1850-8 (2009). |
Garstecki, P. et al. “Formation of monodisperse bubbles in a microfluidic flow-focusing device” Appl. Phys. Lett (2004) 85(13):2659-2651. DOI: 10.1063/1.1796526. |
Bentley et al., “Supplementary Information,” Nature. 456(7218): 53-9 (2008) (55 pages). |
Bentolila et al., “Single-step multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization using semiconductor quantum dot-DNA conjugates,” Cell Biochem Biophys. 45(1): 59-70 (2006). |
Bentzen et al., “Large-scale detection of antigen-specific T cells using peptide-MHC-I multimers labeled with DNA barcodes,” Nat Biotechnol. 34(10):1037-1045 (2016). |
Berkum et al. “Hi-C: a method to study the three-dimensional architecture of genomes,” J Vis Exp. (39):1869 (2010). |
Biles et al., “Low-fidelity Pyrococcus furiosis DNA polymerase mutants useful in error-prone PCR,” Nucleic Acids Res. 32(22):e176 (2004). |
Bjornsson et al., “Intra-individual change over time in DNA methylation with familial clustering,” JAMA. 299(24):2877-83 (2008). |
Bodi et al., “Comparison of Commercially Available Target Enrichment Methods for Next-Generation Sequencing,” J Biomol Tech. 24(2): 73-86 (2013). |
Boone et al., “Plastic advances microfluidic devices. The devices debuted in silicon and glass, but plastic fabrication may make them hugely successful in biotechnology application,” Analytical Chemistry. 78A-86A (2002). |
Boulanger et al., “Massively parallel haplotyping on microscopic beads for the high- throughput phase analysis of single molecules,” PLoS One.7(4):1-10 (2012). |
Boyle et al., “High-resolution genome-wide in vivo footprinting of diverse transcription factors in human cells,” Genome Res. 21 (3):456-64 (2011). |
Braeckmans et al., “Scanning the Code,” Modern Drug Discovery. 28-32 (2003). |
Bransky et al., “A microfluidic droplet generator based on a piezoelectric actuator,” Lab Chip. 9(4):516-20 (2009). |
Brenner et al., “In vitro cloning of complex mixtures of DNA on microbeads: physical separation of differentially expressed cDNAs,” Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 97(4):1665-70 (2000). |
Briggs et al., “Tumor-infiltrating immune repertoires captures by single-cell barcoding in emulsion,” with Supplementary material, bioRxiv. 134841 (2017). |
Brouzes et al., “Droplet microfluidic technology for single-cell high-throughput screening,” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 106(34):14195-200 (2009). |
Brown, “Targeted Sequencing Using Droplet-Based Microfluidics,” RainDance Technologies. 1-18 (2009). |
Browning et al., “Haplotype phasing: existing methods and new developments,” Nat Rev Genet. 12(10):703-14 (2011). |
Buchman et al., “Selective RNA amplification: a novel method using dUMP-containing primers and uracil DNA glycosylase,” PCR Methods Appl. 3(1):28-31 (1993). |
Buenrostro et al., “ATAC-seq: A Method for Assaying Chromatin Accessibility Genome- Wide,” Curr Protoc Mol Biol. 109: 21.29.1-21.29.9. (2015). |
Buenrostro et al., “Single-cell chromatin accessibility reveals principles of regulatory variation,” Nature. 523(7561):486-90 (2015). |
Buenrostro et al., “Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome position,” Nat Methods. 10(12):1213-8 (2013). |
Buenrostro, et al., “Tranposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome position”, Nature Methods, 2013, 10(12): 1213-1218. |
Burns et al., “An Integrated Nanoliter DNA Analysis Device,” Science. 282(5388):484-7 (1998). |
Burns et al., “The intensification of rapid reactions in multiphase systems using slug flow in capillaries,” Lab Chip. 1(1): 10-5 (2001). |
Burns, et al. Microfabricated structures for integrated DNA analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. May 28, 1996; 93(11): 5556-5561. |
Bystrykh et al., “Generalized DNA barcode design based on Hamming codes,” PLoS One. 7(5):e36852 (2012). |
Cappuzzo et al., “Increased HER2 gene copy number is associated with response to gefitinib therapy in epidermal growth factor receptor-positive non-small-cell lung cancer patients,” J Clin Oncol. 23(22):5007-18 (2005). |
Carroll, “The selection of high-producing cell lines using flow cytometry and cell sorting,” Exp Op Biol. Therp. 4(11): 1821-1829 (2004). |
Caruccio et al. “Preparation of Next-Generation Sequencing Libraries Using Nextera Technology: Simultaneous DNA Fragmentation and Adaptor Tagging by In Vitro Transposition,” Methods Mol Biol. 733:241-55 (2011). |
Caruccio, et al., “Nextera Technology for NGS DNA Library Preparation: Simultaneous Fragmentation and Tagging by In Vitro Transposition,” Nextera Technology. 16-3: 1-3 (2009). |
Casbon et al., “Reflex: intramolecular barcoding of long-range PCR products for sequencing multiple pooled DNAs,” Nucleic Acids Res. 41(10) 1-6 (2013). |
Cejas et al., “Chromatin immunoprecipitation from fixed clinical tissues reveals tumor-specific enhancer profiles,” Nature Med. 22(6):685-691 (2016). |
Chang et al., “Droplet-based microfluidic platform platform for heterogeneous enzymatic assays,” Lab Chip. 13: 1817-1822 (2013). |
Chaudhary, “A rapid method of cloning functioNal variable-region antibody genese in Escherichia coli as single-chain imrnunotoxins,” Proc Nat! Acad Sci USA. 87: 1066-1070 (1990). |
Chechetkin et al., “Sequencing by hybridization with the generic 6-mer oligonucleotide microarray: an advanced scheme for data processing,” J Biomol Struct Dyn. 8(1):83-101 (2000). |
Chen et al., “Chemical transfection of cells in picoliter aqueous droplets in fluorocarbon oil,” Anal Chem. 83(22): 8816-20 (2011). |
Chinese Office Action and search report dated May 23, 2013 for Application No. CN 200880127116.4 (H0498.70311CN00). |
Choi et al., “Identification of novel isoforms of the EML4-ALK transforming gene in non-small cell lung cancer,” Cancer Res. 68(13):4971-6 (2008). |
Chokkalingam et al., “Probing cellular heterogeneity in cytokine-secreting immune cells using droplet-based microfluidics,” Lab Chip. 13(24):4740-4 (2013). |
Chou, H-P. et al. “Disposable Microdevices for DNA Analysis and Cell Sorting” Proc. Solid-State Sensor and Actuator Workshop Hilton Head, SC Jun. 8-11, 1998, pp. 11-14. |
Christian, et al. Targeting DNA double-strand breaks with TAL effector nucleases. Genetics. 2010;186:757-761. |
Christiansen et al., “The Covalent Eukaryotic Topoisomerase I-DNA Intermediate Catalyzes pH-dependent Hydrolysis and Alcoholysis,” J Biol Chem. 269(15):11367-11373 (1994). |
Chu et al., “Controllable monodisperse multiple emulsions,” Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 46(47):8970-4 (2007). |
Chung et al., “Structural and molecular interrogation of intact biological systems,” Nature. 497(7449):332-7 (2013). |
Clark et al., “Single-cell epigenomics: powerful new methods for understanding gene regulation and cell identity,” Genome Biol. 17:72 (2016). |
Clausell-Tormos et al., “Droplet-based microfluidic platforms for the encapsulation and screening of mammalian cells and multicellular organisms,” Chem Biol. 15:427-437 (2008). |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/440,772, filed Feb. 23, 2017. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/449,741, filed Mar. 3, 2017. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/596,754, filed May 16, 2017. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/717,847, filed Sep. 27, 2017. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/825,740, filed Nov. 29, 2017. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/831,726, filed Dec. 5, 2017. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/831,847, filed Dec. 5, 2017. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/832,183, filed Dec. 5, 2017. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/832,547, filed Dec. 5, 2017. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/842,550, filed Dec. 14, 2017. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/842,687, filed Dec. 14, 2017. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/842,713, filed Dec. 14, 2017. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/847,659, filed Dec. 19, 2017. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/847,752, filed Dec. 19, 2017. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/848,714, filed Dec. 20, 2017. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/850,241, filed Dec. 21, 2017. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/872,499, filed Jan. 16, 2018. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/875,899, filed Jan. 19, 2018. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/887,711, filed Feb. 2, 2018. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/887,947, filed Feb. 2, 2018. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/933,299, filed Mar. 22, 2018. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/975,468, filed May 9, 2018. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/980,473, filed May 15, 2018. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/985,388, filed May 21, 2018. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/000,803, filed Jun. 5, 2018. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/033,065, filed Jul. 11, 2018. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/044,374, filed Jul. 24, 2018. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/045,474, filed Jul. 25, 2018. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/052,431, filed Aug. 1, 2018. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/052,486, filed Aug. 1, 2018. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/056,231, filed Aug. 6, 2018. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/107,685, filed Aug. 21, 2018. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/138,448, filed Sep. 21, 2018. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/144,832, filed Sep. 27, 2018. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/160,576, filed Oct. 15, 2018. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/160,719, filed Oct. 15, 2018. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/165,389, filed Oct. 19, 2018. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/170,980, filed Oct. 25, 2018. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/196,684, filed Nov. 20, 2018. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/206,168, filed Nov. 30, 2018. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/212,441, filed Dec. 6, 2018. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/228,261, filed Dec. 20, 2018. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/228,362, filed Dec. 20, 2018. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/230,936, filed Dec. 21, 2018. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/231,142, filed Dec. 21, 2018. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/231,185, filed Dec. 21, 2018. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/242,962, filed Jan. 8, 2019. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/246,322, filed Jan. 11, 2019. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/249,688, filed Jan. 16, 2019. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/294,769, filed Mar. 6, 2019. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/395,090, filed Apr. 25, 2019. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/419,428, filed May 22, 2019. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/419,461, filed May 22, 2019. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/419,555, filed May 22, 2019. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/419,630, filed May 22, 2019. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/419,820, filed May 22, 2019. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/435,362, filed Jun. 7, 2019. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/435,417, filed Jun. 7, 2019. |
Cong et al., “Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems,” Science. 339(6121):819-23 (2013). |
Cook et al., “Copy-number variations associated with neuropsychiatric conditions,” Nature. 455(7215):919-23 (2008). |
Coufal et al., “L1 retrotransposition in human neural progenitor cells,” Nature. 460(7259):1127-31 (2009). |
Curcio, Mario, Thesis: “Improved Techniques for High-Throughput Molecular Diagnostics,” Doctor in Philosophy of Chemistry, Royal Institute of Technology, 2002 (131 pages). |
Cusanovich et al., “Multiplex single-cell profiling of chromatin accessibility by combinatorial cellular indexing,” Science. (6237): 910-4 (2015). |
Cusanovich et al., “Supplementary materials for Multiplex single-cell profiling of chromatin accessibility by combinatorial cellular indexing,” Science. 348(6237):910-4 (2015). |
Damean et al., “Simultaneous measurement of reactions in microdroplets filled by concentration gradients,” Lab Chip. 9(12): 1707-13 (2009). |
De Bruin et al., “UBS Investment Research. Q-Series®: DNA Sequencing,” UBS Securities LLC (2007) (15 pages). |
Definition of “corresponding”, Merriam-Webster Online, downloaded from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/corresponding (Year: 2019). |
Dekker et al., “Capturing chromosome conformation,” Science. 295(5558):1306-11 (2002). |
Delehanty et al., “Peptides for specific intracellular delivery and targeting of nanoparticles: implications for developing nanoparticle-mediated drug delivery,” Ther Deliv. 1 (3): 411-33 (2010). |
Demirci et al., “Single cell epitaxy by acoustic picolitre droplets,” Lab Chip. 7(9): 1139-45 (2007). |
DePristo et al., “A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data,” Nature Genet. 43(5):491-8 (2011). |
Dey et al., “Integrated genome and transcriptome sequencing of the same cell,” available in PMC Dec. 18, 2017, published in final edited form as: Nature Biotechnology. 33(3): 285-289 (2015). |
Dhingra et al., “A complete solution for high throughput single cell targeted multiomic DNA and RNA sequencing for cancer research,” Poster. AACR 2019. |
Dixit et al., “Perturb-Seq: Dissecting Molecular Circuits with Scalable Single-Cell RNA Profiling of Pooled Genetic Screens,” Cell. 167(7):1853-1866.e17 (2016). |
Doerr, “The smallest bioreactor,” Nature Methods. 2(5): 326 (2005). |
Doshi et al., “Red blood cell-mimicking synthetic biomaterial particles,” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 106(51):21495-21499 (2009). |
Dowding et al., “Oil core/polymer shell microcapsules by internal phase separation from emulsion droplets. II: controlling the release profile of active molecules,” Langmuir. 21(12): 5278-84 (2005). |
Draper et al., “Compartmentalization of electrophoretically separated analytes in a multiphase microfluidic platform,” Anal Chem. 84(13): 5801-8 (2012). |
Dressier et al., “Droplet-based microfluidics enabling impacton drug discovery,” J Biomol Screen. 19(4): 483-96 (2014). |
Dressman et al., “Supplementary Information pp. 1-2 of article published,” PNAS. 100(15): 8817-22 (2003). |
Dressman et al., “Transforming single DNA molecules into fluorescent magnetic particles for detection and enumeration of genetic variations,” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 100(15):8817-22 (2003). |
Drmanac et al., “Sequencing by hybridization (SBH): advantages, achievements, and opportunities,” Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 77: 75-101 (2002). |
Eastburn et al., “Ultrahigh-throughput mammalian single-cell reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction in microfluidic droplets,” Anal Chem. 85(16): 8016-21 (2013). |
Esser-Kahn et al., “Triggered release from polymer capsules,” Macromolecules. 44: 5539-5553 (2011). |
Fabi et al., “Correlation of efficacy between EGFR gene copy number and lapatinib/capecitabine therapy in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer,” J Clin Oncol, ASCO Meeting abstract, Jun. 14, 2010. 1059(28):15S (2010). |
Fan et al., “Noninvasive diagnosis of fetal aneuploidy by shotgun sequencing DNA from maternal blood,” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 105(42): 16266-71 (2008). |
Fan et al., “Whole-genome molecular haplotyping of single cells,” Nat Biotechnol. 29(1):51-7 (2011). |
Fang et al., “Fluoride-cleavable biotinylation phosphoramidite for 5′-end-labeling and affinity purification of synthetic oligonucleotides,” Nucleic Acids Res. 31(2):708-15 (2003). |
Fanielli et al., “Pathology tissue-chromatin immunoprecipitation, coupled with high-throughput sequencing, allows the epigenetic profiling of patient samples,” PNAS. 107(50): 21535-21540 (2010). |
Flisher et al., “A scalable, fully automated process for construction of sequence-ready human exome targeted capture libraries,” Genome Biol. 12(1):R1 (2011). |
Frampton et al., “Development and validation of a clinical cancer genomic profiling test based on massively parallel DNA sequencing” Nat Biotechnol. 31(11):1023-1031 (2013). |
Fredrickson et al., “Macro-to-micro interfaces for microfluidic devices,” Lab Chip. 4(6): 526-33 (2004). |
Freiberg et al., “Polymer microspheres for controlled drug release,” Int J Pharm. 282(1-2): 1-18 (2004). |
Fu et al., “A microfabricated fluorescence-activated cell sorter,” Nat Biotech. 17(11): 1109-1111 (1999). |
Fu. A.Y et al. “A microfabricated fluorescence-activated cell sorter” Nature Biotech (Nov. 1999) 17:1109-1111. |
Fulton et al., “Advanced multiplexed analysis with the FlowMetrix system,” Clin Chem. 43(9): 1749-56(1997). |
Gangadharan et al., “DNA transposon Hermes insert into DNA in nucleosome-free regions in vivo,” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 107(51):21966-72 (2010). |
Gao et al., “Toehold of dsDNA Exchange Affects the Hydrogel Swelling Kinetic of a Polymer-dsDNA Hybrid Hydrogel,” Royal Soc Chem. 7:1741-1746 (2010). |
Gartner et al., “The Microfluidic Toolbox—examples for fluidic interfaces and standardization concepts,” Proc SPIE 4982, Microfluidics, BioMEMS, and Medical Microsystems. (2003). |
Gericke et al., “Functional cellulose beads: preparation, characterization, and applications,” Chem Rev. 113(7) 4812-4836 (2013). |
Ghadessy et al., “Directed evolution of polymerase function by compartmentalized self-replication,” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 98(8): 4552-7 (2001). |
Gonzalez et al., “The influence of CCL3L1 gene-containing segmental duplications on HIV-1/AIDS susceptibility,” Science. 307(5714):1434-40 (2005). |
Granieri, Lucia, Thesis: “Droplet-based microfluidics and engineering of tissue plasminogen activator for biomedical applications,” Doctor of Philosophy in Chemistry, L'Universite de Strasbourg, 2009 (131 pages). |
Grasland-Mongrain et al., “Droplet coalescence in microfluidic devices,” <http://www.eleves.ens.fr/home/grasland/rapports/stage4.pdf>, dated Jan.-Jul. 2003 (31 pages). |
Green et al., “Insertion site preference of Mu, Tn5, and Tn7 transposons,” Mob DNA 3(1):3 (2012). |
Greenleaf, “Assaying the epigenome in limited numbers of cells,” Methods. 72:51-6 (2015). |
Guo et al., “Droplet microfluidics for high-throughput biological assays,” Lab Chip. 12(12):2146-55 (2012). |
Gyarmati et al., “Reversible disulphide formation in polymer networks: a versatile functional group from synthesis to applications,” European Polymer Journal. 49:1268-1286 (2013). |
Hamilton, “microRNA in erythrocytes,” Biochem Soc Trans. 38 (Pt 1): 229-231.(2010). |
Han et al., “Targeted Sequencing of Cancer-Related Genes in Colorectal Cancer Using Next-Generation Sequencing,” PLOS One. 8(5):e64271 (2013). |
Han et al.,“CRISPR-Cas9 delivery to hard-to-transfect cells via membrane deformation” Science Advances. 1(7): E1500454 (2015) (8 pages). |
Haring et al., “Chromatin immunoprecipitation: optimization, quantitative analysis and data normalization.,”Plant Methods. 3:11 (2007). |
Hashimshony, T et al. “CEL-Seq: Single-Cell RNa-Seq by Multiplexed Linear Amplification” Cell Rep. Sep. 27, 2012;2(3):666-73. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.08.003. Epub Aug. 30, 2012. |
He et al., “Genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS), an ultimate marker-assisted selections (MAS) tool to accelerate plant breeding,” Frontiers Plant Sci. 5:1-8 (2014). |
He, “Selective Encapsulation of Single Cells and Subcellular Organelles into Picoliter- and Femtoliter-Volume Droplets,” Anal Chem. 77: 1539-1544 (2005). |
Hebenstreit, “Methods, Challenges and Potentials of Single Cell RNA-seq,” Biology (Basel). 1(3): 658-67 (2012). |
Hiatt et al., “Parallel, tag-directed assembly of locally derived short sequence reads,” Nat Methods. 7(2): 119-22 (2010). |
Hirsch et al., “Easily reversible desthiobiotin binding to streptavidin, avidin, and other biotin-binding proteins: uses for protein labeling, detection, and isolation.” Anal Biochem. 308(2):343-357 (2002). |
Hjerten et al., “General methods to render macroporous stationary phases nonporous and deformable, exemplified with agarose and silica beads and their use in high-performance ion-exchange and hydrophobic-interaction chromatography of proteins,” Chromatographia. 31.1-2: 85-94 (1991). |
Holmberg et al., “The biotin-streptavidin interaction can be reversibly broken using water at elevated temperatures,” Electrophoresis. 26(3):501-10 (2005). |
Holtze, C. et al. Biocompatible surfactants for water-in-fluorocarbon emulsions. Lab Chip. Oct. 2008;8(10):1632-9. doi: 10.1039/b806706f. Epub Sep. 2, 2008. |
Hosokawa et al., “Massively parallel whole genome amplification for single-cell sequencing using droplet microfluidics,” Scientific Reports. 7: No. 5199 (2017). |
Hosono et al., “Unbiased whole-genome amplification directly from clinical samples,” Genome Res. 13(5):954-64 (2003). |
Hu et al., “Shape Controllable Microgel Particles Prepared by Microfluidic Combining External Crosslinking,” Biomicrofluidics. 6(2):26502-265029 (2012). |
Huebner et al., “Quantitative detection of protein expression in single cells using droplet microfluidics,” Chern Commun (Camb). (12):1218-1220 (2007). |
Hug, H. et al. “Measurement of the No. of molecules of a single mRNA species in a complex mRNA preparation” J Theor Biol. Apr. 21, 2003;221(4):615-24. |
Illumina Nextera Enrichment Sample Preparation Guide. Feb. 2013. |
Illumina TruSeq Custom Enrichment Kit Data Sheet, (c) 2014. |
Imburgio et al., “Studies of promoter recognition and start site selection by T7 Rna polymerase using a comprehensive collection of promoter variants,” Biochemistry. 39(34):10419-30 (2000). |
Invitrogen Dynal, Product Sheet for “Dynabeads® M-280 Streptavidin,” (2006) (2 pages). |
Loannidis, Nicolas, Thesis: “Manufacturing of agarose-based chromatographic adsorbents with controlled pore and particle sizes,” Doctor of Philosophy in Chemical Engineering, The University of Birmingham, 2009. |
Jena et al., “Cyclic olefin copolymer based microfluidic devices for biochip applications: Ultraviolet surface grafting using 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine,” Biomicrofluidics. 6(1): 12822-1282212 (2012). |
Jin et al., “Genome-wide detection of DNase I hypersensitive sites in single cells and FFPE tissue samples,” Nature. 528(7580): 142-6 (2015). |
Joneja et al., “Linear nicking endonuclease-mediated strand-displacement DNA amplification,” Anal Biochem. 414(1):58-69 (2011). |
Jung et al., “Micro machining of injection mold inserts for fluidic channel of polymeric biochips,” Sensors. 7(8): 1643-1654 (2007). |
Kamperman et al., “Centering Single Cells in Microgels via Delayed Crosslinking Supports Long-Term 3D Culture by Preventing Cell Escape,” Small. 13(22) (2017). |
Kaper et al., “Supporting Information for Whole-genome haplotyping by dilution, amplification, and sequencing,” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 110(14):5552-7 (2013). |
Kaper et al., “Whole-genome haplotyping by dilution, amplification, and sequencing,” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 110(14):5552-7 (2013),. |
Karmakar et al., “Organocatalytic removal of formaldehyde adducts from RNA and DNA bases,” Nat Chem. 7(9):752-8 (2015). |
Katsura et al., “Indirect micromanipulation of single molecules in water-in-oil emulsion,” Electrophoresis. 22(2): 289-93 (2001). |
Kebschull et al., “High-Throughput Mapping of Single-Neuron Projections by Sequencing of Barcoded RNA,” Neuron. 91(5):975-87 (2016). |
Kenis et al., “Microfabrication Inside Capillaries Using Multiphase Laminar Flow Patterning,” Science. 285(5424): 83-5 (1999). |
Khomiakava et al., “Analysis of perfect and mismatched DNA duplexes by a generic hexanucleotide microchip,” Mol Biol (Mosk). 37(4):726-41 (2003) (Abstract only). |
Kim et al., “Albumin loaded microsphere of amphiphilic poly( ethylene glycol)/poly(a-ester) multiblock copolymer,” Eu J Pharm Sci. 23: 245-51 (2004). |
Kim et al., “Fabrication of monodisperse gel shells and functional microgels in microfluidic devices,” Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 46(11): 1819-22 (2007). |
Kim et al., “Rapid prototyping of microfluidic systems using a PDMS/polymer tape composite,” Lab Chip. 9(9): 1290-3 (2009). |
Kirkness et al., “Sequencing of isolated sperm cells for direct haplotyping of a human genome,” Genome Res. 23:826-83 (2013). |
Kitzman et al., “Haplotype-resolved genome sequencing of a Gujarati Indian individual.” Nat Biotechnol. 29:59-63 (2011). |
Kitzman et al., “Noninvasive whole-genome sequencing of a human fetus,” Sci Transl Med. 4(137):137ra76 (2016). |
Kivioj, et al., “Counting Absolute Numbers of Molecules Using Unique Molecular Identifiers”, Nature Methods 9, 72-74 (2012). |
Klein et al., “Droplet barcoding for single-cell transcriptomics applied to embryonic stem cells,” Cell. 161(5): 1187-201 (2015). |
Knapp et al., “Generating barcoded libraries for multiplex high-throughput sequencing,” Methods Mol Biol. 840:155-70 (2012). |
Knight et al., “Subtle chromosomal rearrangements in children with unexplained mental retardation,” Lancet. 354(9191):1676-81 (1999). |
Kolodeziejczyk et al., “The technology and biology of single-cell RNA sequencing,” Molecular Cell. 58(4): 610-20 (2015). |
Korlach et al., “Methods in Enzymology, Real-Time DNA Sequencing from Single Polymerase Molecules,” 472:431-455 (2010). |
Koster et al., “Drop-based microfluidic devices for encapsulation of single cells”, Lab on a Chip The Royal Soc. of Chem. 8:1110-1115 (2008). |
Kozarewa et al., “96-plex molecular barcoding for the Illumina Genome Analyzer,” Methods Mol Biol. 733:279-98 (2011). |
Kozarewa et al., “Amplification-free Illumina sequencing-library preparation facilitates improved mapping and assembly of GC-biased genomes,” Nat Methods. 6: 291-5 (2009). |
Kutyavin, et al., “Oligonucleotides containing 2-aminoadenine and 2-thiothymine act as selectively binding complementary agents,” Biochemistry. 35(34):11170-6 (1996). |
Kwok et al., “Single-molecule analysis for molecular haplotyping,” Hum Mutat. 23:442-6 (2004). |
Lagally et al., “Single-Molecular DNA Amplification and Analysis in an Integrated Microfluidic Device,” Anal Chem. 73(3): 565-70 (2001). |
Lagus et al., “A review of the theory, methods and recent applications of high-throughput single-cell droplet microfluidics,” J Phys D Appl Phys. 46:114005 (2013) (21 pages). |
Lai et al., “Characterization and Use of Laser-Based Lysis for Cell Analysis On-Chip,” Journal of the Royal Society. 5(2): S113-S121 (2008). |
Laird et al., “Hairpin-bisulfite PCR: Assessing epigenetic methylation patterns on complementary strands of individual DNA molecules,” PNAS.101, 204-209 (2004). |
Lake et al., “Integrative Single-Cell Analysis By Transcriptional and Epigenetic States in Human Adult Brain,” Apr. 19, 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/128520. |
Lan et al. “Single-cell genome sequencing at ultra-high-throughput with microfluidic droplet barcoding” Nat Biotechnol. 35(7):640-646(2017). |
Lander et al., “Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome,” Nature. 409: 860-921 (2001). |
Lasken et al., “Archaebacterial DNA Polymerases Tightly Bind Uracil-containing DNA,” J Biol Chem. 271 (30):17692-17696 (1996). |
Lebedev et al.,. “Hot Start PCR with heat-activatable primers: a novel approach for improved PCR performance,” NAR. 36(20):E131-1 (2008). |
Lee et al., “Alginate: Properties and biomedical applications,” Prog Polym Sci. 37(1 ):106-126 (2012). |
Lee et al., “ACT-PRESTO: Rapid and consistent tissue clearing and labeling method for 3-dimensional (3D) imaging,” Sci Rep. 6:18631 (2016). |
Lee et al., “Fluorescent in situ sequencing (FISSEQ) of RNA for gene expression profiling in intact cells and tissues,” Nature Protocols. 10(3):442-458 (2015). |
Lee et al., “Highly multiplexed subcellular RNA sequencing in situ,” Science. 343(6177): 1360-3 (2014). |
Lennon et al., “A scalable, fully automated process for construction of sequence-ready barcoded libraries for 454,” Genome Biol. 11(2):R15 (2010). |
Li et al., “A single-cell-based platform for copy number variation profiling through digital counting of amplified genomic DNA fragments,” ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b03146 (2017). |
Li et al., “PEGylated PLGA Nanoparticles as protein carriers: synthesis, preparation and biodistribution in rats,” Journal of Controlled Release. 71: 203-211 (2001). |
Lienemann et al., “Single cell-laden protease-sensitive microniches for long-term culture in 3,”. Lab Chip. 17(4):727-737(2017). |
Linch et al., “Bone marrow processing and cryopreservation,” Journal of Clinical Pathology. 35(2): 186-190(1982). |
Liu et al., “Preparation of uniform-sized PLA microcapsules by combining Shirasu porous glass membrane emulsification technique and multiple emulsion-solvent evaporation method,” J Control Release. 103(1): 31-43 (2005). |
Liu et al., “Smart thermo-triggered squirting capsules for Nanoparticle delivery,” Soft Matter. 6(16):3759-3763 (2010). |
Lo et al., “On the design of clone-based haplotyping,” Genome Biol. 14(9):R100 (2013). |
Loscertales et al., “Micro/Nano Encapsulation via Electrified Coaxial Liquid Jets,” Science. 295: 1695-1698 (2002). |
Love, “A microengraving method for rapid selection of single cells producing antigen-specific antibodies,” Nature Biotech. 24(6): 703 (2006). |
Lowe, Adam James, Thesis: “Norbornenes and [n]polynorbornanes as molecular scaffolds for anion recognition,” Doctor of Philosophy, Deakin University, 2010 (361 pages). |
Lundin et al., “Hierarchical molecular tagging to resolve long continuous sequences by massively parallel sequencing,” Sci Rep. 3:1186 (2003). |
Lupski et al., “Genomic rearrangements and sporadic disease,” Nat Genet. 39(7 Suppl):S43- 7 (2007). |
Macaulay et al., “G&T-seq: parallel sequencing of single-cell genomes and transcriptomes,” Nature Methods, p. 1-7 (2005). |
Macaulay et al., “Single-Cell Multiomics: Multiple Measurements from Single Cells,” available in PMS Dec. 18, 2017, published in final edited form as: Trends in Genetics. 33(2): 155-168 (2017). |
Macosko et al., “Highly Parallel Genome-wide Expression Profiling of Individual Cells Using Nanoliter Droplets,” Cell. 161(5): 1202-14 (2015). |
Maeda et al., “Development of a DNA barcode tagging method for monitoring dynamic changes in gene expression by using an ultra high-throughput sequencer,” Biotechniques. 45(1): 95-7 (2008). |
Mair et al., “Injection molded microfluidic chips featuring integrated interconnects,” Lab Chip. 6(10): 1346-54 (2006). |
Makino et al., “Preparation of hydrogel microcapsules: Effects of preparation conditions upon membrane properties,” Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 12(2): 97-104 (1998). |
Mali et al., “Barcoding cells using cell-surface programmable DNA-binding domains,” Nat Methods. 10(5): 403-6 (2013). |
Mamedov et al., “Preparing unbiased T-cell receptor and antibody cDNA libraries for the deep next generation sequencing profiling,” Front Immunol. 4: 456 (2013). |
Man, Piu Francis, Thesis: “Monolithic Structures for Integrated Microfluidic Analysis,” Doctor of Philosophy in Electrical Engineering, University of Michigan, 2001 (145 pages). |
Marcus, “Gene method offers diagnostic hope,” The Wall Street Journal, <https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303644004577520851224339844>, dated Jul. 11, 2012. |
Margulies et al. “Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picoliter reactors”, Nature (2005) 437:376-380. |
Margulies, “Supplementary methods,” (2005). |
Maricic et al., “Optimization of 454 sequencing library preparation from small amounts of DNA permits sequence determination of both DNA strands,” Biotechniques. 46(1 ):51-2, 54-7 (2009). |
Matochko et al., “Uniform amplification of phage display libraries in monodisperse emulsions,” Methods. 58(1): 18-27 (2012). |
Mazutis et al., “Selective droplet coalescence using microfluidic systems,” Lab Chip. 12(10): 1800-6 (2012). |
McGinnis et al., “MULTI-seq: Scalable sample multiplexing for single-cell RNA sequencing using lipid-tagged indices,” bioRxiv 387241; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/387241. |
Merriman et al., “Progress in ion torrent semiconductor chip based sequencing,” Electrophoresis. 33(23): 3397-417 (2012). |
Meyer et al., “From micrograms to picograms: quantitative PCR reduces the material demands of high-throughput sequencing,” Nucleic Acids Research. 36(1): e5 (2008) (6 pages). |
Meyer et al., “Targeted high-throughput sequencing of tagged nucleic acid samples,” Nucleic Acids Res. 35(15): e97 (2007). |
Microfluidic ChipShop, Microfluidic product catalogue, dated Mar. 2005. |
Microfluidic ChipShop, Microfluidic product catalogue, dated Oct. 2009. |
Mignardi et al., “Oligonucleotide gap-fill ligation for mutation detection and sequencing in situ,” Nucl Acids Res. 43(22): e151 (2015). |
Miller et al., “An improved zinc-finger nuclease architecture for highly specific genome editing,” Nat Biotechnol. 25:778-785 (2007). |
Miller-Stephenson Chemicals 157 FS Series catalog, www.miller-stephenon.com. |
MiRNA (http://www.exiqon.com/what-are-microRNAs) accessed Oct. 19, 2017. |
Mirzabekov, “DNA Sequencing by Hybridization—a Megasequencing Method and a Diagnostic Tool?” Trends in Biotechnology. 12(1): 27-32 (1994). |
Moore et al., “Behavior of capillary valves in centrifugal microfluidic devices prepared by three-dimensional printing,” Microfluidics and Nanofluidics. 10(4):877-888 (2011). |
Morgan et al., “Chapter 12: Human microbiome analysis,” PLoS Comput Biol. 8(12):e1002808 (2012). |
Morimoto et al., “Monodisperse semi-permeable microcapsules for continuous observation of cells,” Lab Chip 9(15):2217-2223 (2009). |
Morton, “Parameters of the human genome,” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 88(17):7474-6 (1991). |
Mouritzen et al., “Single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping using locked nucleic acid (LNa),” Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 3(1): 27-38 (2003). |
Mozhanova et al., “Local elastic properties of biological materials studied by SFM,” XP055314108, <http://www.ntmdt.com/data/media/files/publications/2003/08.08_a.a.mozhanova_n.i.n_english.pd f>, dated 2003. |
Muotri et al., “L1 retrotransposition in neurons is modulated by MeCP2,” Nature. 468(7322):443-6 (2010). |
Myllykangas et al., “Targeted Sequencing Library Preparation By Genomic DNA Circularization,” BMC Biotechnology. 11(122), 1-12 (2011). |
Nagano et al., “Single-cell Hi-C reveals cell-to-cell variability in chromosome structure,” Nature. 502(7469):59-64 (2013). |
Nagashima et al., “Preparation of monodisperse poly (acrylamide-co-acrylic acid) hydrogel microspheres by a membrane emulsification technique and their size-dependent surface properties,” Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 11(1-2): 47-56 (1998). |
Narayanan et al., “Determination of agarose gel pore size: Absorbance measurements vis a vis other techniques,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 28. 83-86 (2006). |
National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), “The Human Genome Project Completion: Frequently Asked Questions,” retrieved from <https://www.genome.gov/11006943/human-genome-project-completion-frequently-asked-questions/> on May 10, 2018, last updated Oct. 30, 2010 (8 pages). |
Navin, “The first five years of single-cell cancer genomics and beyond,” Genome Res. 25(10):1499-507 (2015). |
Nguyen et al., “In situ hybridization to chromosomes stabilized in gel microdrops,” Cytometry. 21(2):111-9 (1995). |
Nisisako et al., “Droplet formation in a microchannel network,” Lab Chip. 2(1):24-6 (2002). |
Nisisako et al., “Droplet Formation in a Microchannel on PMMA Plate,” Micro Total Analysis Systems 2001. J.M. Ramsey and A. van den Berg, 137-138 (2001). |
Novak et al., “Single cell multiplex gene detection and sequencing using microfluidically-generated agarose emulsions,” available in PMC Jan. 10, 2012, published in final edited form as: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 50(2):390-5 (2011) (10 pages). |
Oberholzer et al., “Polymerase chain reaction in liposomes,” Chem Biol. 2(10):677-82 (1995). |
Ogawa et al., “Production and characterization of O/W emulsions containing cationic droplets stabilized by lecithin-chitosan membranes,” J Agric Food Chem. 51(9):2806-12 (2003). |
Okushima et al., “Controlled Production of Monodisperse Double Emulsions by Two-Step Droplet Breakup in Microfluidic Devices,” Langmuir. 20(23):9905-8 (2004). |
Oligotex Handbook. For purification of poly A+ RNA from total RNA and directly from cultured cells or tissues as well as purification of polyadenylated in vitro transcripts. Jun. 2012. |
Orakdogen et al., “Novel responsive poly(N,N-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate) gel beads: preparation, mechanical properties and pH-dependent swelling behavior,” J Polym Res. 19:9914 (2012). |
Oyola et al., “Optimizing Illumina next-generation sequencing library preparation for extremely AT-biased genomes,” BMC Genomics. 13:1 (2012). |
Pantel et al., “Detection methods of circulating tumor cells,” J Thorac Dis. 4(5):446-7 (2012). |
Park et al.,“ChIP-seq: advantages and challenges of a maturing technology,” Nature Reviews Genetics. 10:669-680 (2009). |
Patel et al., “Single-cell RNA-seq highlights intratumoral heterogeneity in primary glioblastoma,” Science. 344(6190):1396-401 (2014). |
PCT/IB2010/002243, International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Feb. 9, 2011, 13pgs. |
Perez et al., “Poly(lactic acid)-poly(ethylene glycol) Nanoparticles as new carriers for the delivery ofplasmid DNA,” Journal of Controlled Release. 75: 211-224 (2001). |
Perrott, “Optimization and Improvement of Emulsion PCR for the Ion Torrent Next- Generation Sequencing Platform,” PhD Thesis(2011). |
Peters et al., “Accurate whole-genome sequencing and haplotyping from 10 to 20 human cells,” Nature. 487(7406):190-5 (2012). |
Pfeifer et al., “Bivalent cholesterol-based coupling of oligonucleotides to lipid membrane assemblies,” J Am Chem Soc. 126(33): 10224-5 (2004). |
Picot et al., “A biomimetic microfluidic chip to study the circulation and mechanical retention of red blood cells in the spleen” Am J Hematology. 90(4):339-345 (2015). |
Pinto et al., “Functional impact of global rare copy number variation in autism spectrum disorders,” Nature. 466(7304):368-72 (2015). |
Plunkett et al., “Chymotrypsin responsive hydrogel: application of a disulfide exchange protocol for the preparation of methacrylamide containing peptides,” Biomacromolecules. 6(2):632-7 (2005). |
Porteus et al., “Chimeric nucleases stimulate gene targeting in human cells,” Science. 300(5620):763 (2003). |
Pott et al., “Single-cell ATAC-seq: strength in numbers,” Genome Biol.16(1):172 (2015). |
Preissl et al., “Single nucleus analysis of the chromatin landscape in mouse forebrain development,” bioRxiv 159137 (2017). |
Qiagen, “Omniscript® Reverse Transcription Handbook,” Oct. 2010 (32 pages). |
Rakszewska et al., “One drop at a time: toward droplet microfluidics as a versatile tool for single-cell analysis,” NPG Asia Materials. 6(10):e133 (2014) (12 pages). |
Ram et al., “Strategy for microbiome analysis using 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis on the Illumina sequencing platform,” Syst Biol Reprod Med. 57(3):162-70 (2011). |
Ramsey, “The burgeoning power of the shrinking laboratory” Nat Biotechnol. 17(11):1061-2 (1999). |
Ramskold et al., “Full-length mRNA-Seq from single-cell levels of RNA and individual circulating tumor cells” Nat Biotechnol. 30(8):777-782 (2012). |
Ran et al., “Genome Engineering Using the CRISPR-Cas9 System,” Nature Protocol. 8(11):2281-2308 (2013). |
Reis et al., “CRISPR/Cas9 and Targeted Genome Editing: A New Era in Molecular Biology,” XP002766825: URL:https://ww.neb.com/tools-and-resources/feabture-articles/crispr- cas9-and-targeted-genome-editing-a-new-era-in-molecular-biology (2014). |
Reisner et al., “Single-molecule denaturation mapping of DNA in nanofluidic channels,” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S.A., 107: 13294-9,(2010). |
Repp et al., “Genotyping by Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction for Detection of Endemic Hepatitis B Virus Transmission,” J Clinical Microbiology. 31:1095-1102 (1993). |
Richardson et al., “Novel inhibition of archaeal family-D DNA polymerase by uracil,” Nucleic Acids Res. 41(7):4207-18 (2013). |
Roche, “Using Multiplex Identifier (MID) Adaptors for the GS FLX Titanium Chemistry Basic MID Set Genome Sequencer FLX System,” Technical Bulletin 004-2009, <http://454.com/downloads/my454/documentation/technical-bulletins/TCB-09004 Using MultiplexIdentifierAdaptorsForTheGSFLXTitaniumSeriesChemistry-BasicMIDSet.pdf>, dated Apr. 1, 2009 (7 pages). |
Roche, “Using Multiplex Identifier (MID) Adaptors for the GS FLX Titanium Chemistry Extended MID Set Genome Sequencer FLX System,” Technical Bulletin 005-2009, <http://454.com/downloads/my454/documentation/technical-bulletins/TCB-09005UsingMultiplexIdentifierAdaptorsForTheGSFLXTitaniumChemistry-ExtendedMIDSet.pdf>, dated Apr. 1, 2009 (7 pages). |
Rodrigue et al., “Whole genome amplification and de novo assembly of single bacterial cells,” PLoS One. 4(9):e6864 (2009). |
Rogozin et al., “A highly conserved family of inactivated archaeal B family DNA polymerases,” Biol Direct. 3:32 (2008). |
Ropers, “New perspectives for the elucidation of genetic disorders,” Am J Hum Genet. 81(2):199-207 (2007). |
Rotem et al., “High-Throughput Single-Cell Labeling (Hi-SCL) for RNA-Seq Using Drop-Based Microfluidics,” PLoS One. 10(5):e0116328 (2015). |
Rotem et al., “Single Cell Chip-Seq Using Drop-Based Microfluidics,” Frontiers of Single Cell Analysis, September 5-7, Stanford University. Abstract #50 (2013). |
Rotem et al., “Single-cell ChIP-seq reveals cell subpopulations defined by chromatin state,” Nat Biotechnol. 33(11):1165-72 (2015). |
Ryan et al., “Rapid assay for mycobacterial growth and antibiotic susceptibility using gel microdrop and encapsulation,” J Clin Microbiol. 33(7):1720-6 (1995). |
Sakaguchi et al., “Cautionary Note on the Use of dUMP-Containing PCR Primers with Pfu and VentR®,” BioTechniques. 21(3): 369-370 (1996). |
Sander et al., “Selection-free zinc-finger-nuclease engineering by context-dependent assembly (CoDA),” Nat Methods. 8(1):67-9 (2011). |
Savva et al., “The structural basis of specific base-excision repair by uracil-DNA glycosylase,” Nature. 373(6514):487-93 (1995). |
Schirinzi et al., “Combinatorial sequencing-by-hybridization: aNalysis of the NFI gene,” Genet Test. 10(1):8-17(2006). |
Schmeider et al., “Fast identification and removal of sequence contamination from genomic and metagenomic datasets,” PLoS One. 6(3):e17288 (2011). |
Schmitt et al., “Bead-based multiplex genotyping of human papillomaviruses,” J Clin Microbiol. 44(2):504-12(2006). |
Schubert et al., “Microemulsifying fluorinated oils with mixtures of fluorinated and hydrogenated surfactants,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 84(1):97-106 (1994). |
Schwartz et al., “Capturing native long-range contiguity by in situ library construction and optical sequencing,” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 109(46):18749-54 (2012). |
Sebat et al., “Strong association of de novo copy number mutations with autism,” Science. 316(5823):445-9 (2007). |
Seiffert et al., “Microfluidic fabrication of smart microgels from macromolecular precursors,” Polymer. 51(25):5883-9 (2010). |
Seiffert et al., “Smart microgel capsules from macromolecular precursors,” J Am Chem Soc. 132(18):6606-9 (2010). |
Shah, “Fabrication of mono disperse thermosensitive microgels and gel capsules in micro fluidic devices”, Soil Matter 4:2303-2309 (2008). |
Shahi et al., “Abseq: Ultrahigh-throughput single cell protein profiling with droplet microfluidic barcoding,” Sci Rep. 7:44447 (2017). |
Shaikh et al., “A modular microfluidic architecture for integrated biochemical analysis,” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 102(28) :9745-9750 (2005). |
Shimkus et al., “A chemically cleavable biotinylated nucleotide: usefulness in the recovery of protein-DNA complexes from avidin affinity columns,” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 82(9):2593-7 (1985). |
Shlien et al., “Copy number variations and cancer,” Genome Med. 1(6):62 (2009). |
Shlien et al., “Excessive genomic DNA copy number variation in the Li-Fraumeni cancer predisposition syndrome,” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 105(32):11264-9 (2008). |
Shuttleworth et al., “Recognition of the pro-mutagenic base uracil by family B DNA polymerases from archaea,” J Mol Biol. 337(3):621-34 (2004). |
Simeonov et al., “Single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping using short, fluorescently labeled locked nucleic acid (LNA) probes and fluorescence polarization detection,” Nucleic Acids Res. 30(17):e91 (2002). |
Simon et al., “Using formaldehyde-assisted isolation of regulatory elements (FAIRE) to isolate active regulatory DNA,” Nat Protoc. 7(2):256-67 (2012). |
Skerra, “Phosphorothioate primers improve the amplification of DNA sequences by DNA polymerases with proofreading activity,” Nucleic Acids Res. 20(14):3551-4 (1992). |
Smith et al., “Highly-multiplexed barcode sequencing: an efficient method for parallel analysis of pooled samples,” Nucleic Acids Res. 38(13):e142 (2010). |
Song et al., “DNase-seq: A High-Resolution Technique for Mapping Active Gene Regulatory Elements across the Genome from Mammalian Cells,” Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2 (2010) (13 pages). |
Song et al., “Reactions in droplets in microfluidic channels,” Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 45(44):7336-56 (2006). |
Sorokin et al., “Discrimination between perfect and mismatched duplexes with oligonucleotide gel microchips: role of thermodynamic and kinetic effects during hybridization,” J Biomol Struct Dyn. 22(6):725-34 (2005). |
Stoeckius et al., “Large-scale simultaneous measurement of epitopes and transcriptomes in single cells,” available in PMC Jan. 31, 2018, published in final edited form as: Nat Methods. 14(9):865-868 (2017). |
Stoeckius et al., “Simultaneous epitope and transcriptome measurement in single cells,” Nat Methods. 14: 865-868 (2017) (Supplemental Materials). |
Su et al., “Microfluidics-Based Biochips: Technology Issues, Implementation Platforms, and Design-Automation Challenges,” IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems. 25(2):211-23 (2006). |
Sun et al., “Progress in research and application of liquid-phase chip technology,” Chin J Exp Surg. 22(5):639-40 (2005) (7 pages). |
Susaki et al., “Whole-brain imaging with single-cell resolution using chemical cocktails and computational analysis,” Cell. 157(3):726-39 (2014). |
Syed, et al. Nature Methods 2 pgs (Nov. 2009). |
Tawfik, D.S. et al. “Man-made cell-like compartments for molecular evolution” Nature Biotech (Jul. 1998) 16:652-656. |
Tayyab et al., “Size exclusion chromatography and size exclusion HPLC of proteins,” Biochem Ed, Pergamon. 19(3):149-152 (1991). |
Tewhey et al., “Microdroplet-based PCR amplification for large-scale targeted sequencing,” available in PMC May 1, 2010, published in final edited form as: Nat Biotechnol. 27(11):1025-31 (2009) (22 pages). |
Tewhey et al., “Supplementary Materials,” Nature Biotechnology. 27(11): 1-22 (2009). |
Thaxton et al., “A Bio-Bar-Code Assay Based Upon Dithiothreitol Oligonucleotide Release” Anal Chem. 77:8174-8178 (2005). |
Theberge, A.B, et al. Microdropelts in microfluidics: an evolving platform for discoveries in chemistry and biology. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. Aug. 9, 2010;49(34):5846-68. doi: 10.1002/anie.200906653. |
Thorsen et al., “Dynamic pattern formation in a vesicle-generating microfluidic device,” Phys Rev Lett. 86(18):4163-4166 (2001). |
Tomer et al., “Advanced CLARITY for rapid and high-resolution imaging of intact tissues,” Nat Protoc. 9(7):1682-97 (2014). |
Tonelli et al., “Perfluoropolyether functional oligomers: unusual reactivity in organic chemistry” Journal of Fluorine Chemistry. 118(1-2):107-21 (2002). |
Tubeleviciute et al., “Compartmentalized self-replication (CSR) selection of Thermococcus litoralis Sh1B DNA polymerase for diminished uracil binding,” Protein Eng Des Sel. 23(8):589-97 (2010). |
Turner et al., “Assaying chromosomal inversions by single-molecule haplotyping,” Nat Methods. 3(6):439-45 (2006). |
Turner et al., “High-throughput haplotype determination over long distances by haplotype fusion PCR and ligation haplotyping,” Nat Protoc. 4(12):1771-83 (2009). |
Turner et al., “Methods for genomic partitioning,” Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 10:263-84 (2009). |
Ullal et al., “Cancer Cell Profiling by Barcoding Allows Multiplexed Protein Analysis in Fine-Needle Aspirates,” Sci Transl Med. 6(219): 219ra9 (2014). |
Ushijima et al., “Detection and interpretation of altered methylation patterns in cancer cells,” Nat Rev Cancer. 5: 223-231 (2005). |
Van Nieuwerburgh et al., “Illumina mate-paired DNA sequencing-library preparation using Cre-Lox recombination,” Nucleic Acids Res. 40(3): e24 (2012). |
Wagner et al., “Biocompatible fluorinated polyglycerols for droplet microfluidics as an alternative to PEG-based copolymer surfactants,” Lab Chip. 16(1):65-9 (2016). |
Wang et al., “A novel thermo-induced self-bursting microcapsule with magnetic-targeting property,” Chemphyschem. 10(14):2405-9 (2009). |
Wang et al., “Digital karyotyping,” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 99(25):16156-61 (2002). |
Wang et al., “Self-Formed Adaptor PCR: a Simple and Efficient Method for Chromosome Walking,” Appl Environ Microbiol. 73(15):5048-51 (2007). |
Wang et al., “Single nucleotide polymorphism discrimination assisted by improved base stacking hybridization using oligonucleotide microarrays,” Biotechniques. 35(2):300-8 (2003). |
Ward et al., “Microfluidic flow focusing: drop size and scaling in pressure versus flow-rate-driven pumping,” Electrophoresis. 26(19):3716-24 (2005). |
Weaver, J.C. et al. “Rapid clonal growth measurements at the single-cell level: gel microdroplets and flow cytometry”, Biotechnology, 9:873-877 (1991). |
Weigl et al., “Microfluidic Diffusion-Based Separation and Detection,” Science. 283(5400):346-7 (1999). |
Wesolowska et al., “Cost-effective multiplexing before capture allows screening of 25 000 clinically relevant SNPs in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia,” Leukemia. 25(6):1001-6 (2011). |
Whitesides et al., “Soft lithography in biology and biochemistry,” Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 3:335-73 (2001). |
Williams, R. et al. “Amplification of complex gene libraries by emulsion PCR” Nature Methods (Jul. 2006) 3(7):545-550. |
Wiseman et al., “Major histocompatibility complex genotyping with massively parallel pyrosequencing,” Nat Med. 15(11):1322-6 (2009). |
Wong et al., “Multiplexed Barcoded CRISPR-Cas9 Screening Enabled By CombiGEM,” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 113(9):2544-9 (2016). |
Woo et al., “G/C-modified oligodeoxynucleotides with selective complementarity: synthesis and hybridization properties,” Nucleic Acids Res. 24(13):2470-5 (1996). |
Wood et al., “Targeted genome editing across species using ZFNs and TALENs,” Science. 333(6040):307 (2011). |
Xi et al., “New library construction method for single-cell genomes,” PLoS One. 12(7):e0181163 (2017). |
Xia et al., “Soft Lithography,” Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 37(5):550-575 (1998). |
Xia et al., “Soft Lithography,” Ann Rev Mat Sci. 28:153-184 (1998). |
Xiao et al., “Determination of haplotypes from single DNA molecules: a method for single-molecule barcoding,” Hum Mutat. 28(9):913-21 (2007). |
Yamamoto et al., “Chemical modification of Ce(IV)/EDTA-based artificial restriction DNA cutter for versatile manipulation of double-stranded DNA,” Nucleic Acids Res. 35(7):e53 (2007). |
Yan et al., “Rapid one-step construction of hairpin RNA,” Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 383(4):464-8 (2009). |
Zeng et al., “High-performance single cell genetic analysis using microfluidic emulsion generator arrays,” Anal Chem. 82(8):3183-90 (2010). |
Zentner et al., “Surveying the epigenomic landscape, one base at a time,” Genome Biol. 13(10):250 (2012). |
Zhang et al., “Combinatorial marking of cells and organelles with reconstituted fluorescent proteins,” Cell. 119(1):137-144 (2004). |
Zhang et al., “Degradable disulfide core-cross-linked micelles as a drug delivery system prepared from vinyl functionalized nucleosides via the RAFT process,” Biomacromolecules. 9(11):3321-31 (2008). |
Zhang et al., “Efficient construction of sequence-specific TAL effectors for modulating mammalian transcription,” Nat Biotechnol. 29(2):149-53 (2011). |
Zhang et al., “One-step fabrication of supramolecular microcapsules from microfluidic droplets,” Science. 335(6069):690-4 (2012). |
Zhang et al., “Reconstruction of DNA sequencing by hybridization,” Bioinformatics. 19(1):14-21 (2003). |
Zhang, Michael Yu, Thesis: “Genomics of inherited bone marrow failure and myelodysplasia,” Doctor of Philosophy in Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Washington, 2015 (142 pages). |
Zhao et al., “Preparation of hemoglobin-loaded Nano-sized particles with porous structure as oxygen carriers,” Biomaterials. 28(7):1414-1422 (2007). |
Zheng et al., “Haplotyping germline and cancer genomes with high-throughput linked-read sequencing,” Nat Biotechnol. 34(3):303-11 (2016). |
Zheng et al., “Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells,” Nat Commun. 8:14049 (2017). |
Zhou et al., “Development of an enzyme activity screening system for beta-glucosidase-displaying yeasts using calcium alginate micro-beads and flow sorting,” Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 84: 375-382 (2009). |
Zhu et al., “Hydrogel Droplet Microfluidics for High-Throughput Single Molecule/Cell Analysis,” Accounts of Chemical Research. 50(1): 22-31 (2016). |
Zhu et al., “Reverse transcriptase template switching: a SMART approach for full-length cDNA library construction,” Biotechniques. 30(4):892-7 (2001). |
Zhu et al., “Synthesis and self-assembly of highly incompatible polybutadiene-poly(hexafluoropropylene oxide) diblock copolymers,” J Polymer Sci Part B: Polymer Phys. 43(24):3685-3694 (2005). |
Zimmermann et al., “Microscale production of hybridomas by hypo-osmolar electrofusion,” Hum Antibodies Hybridomas. 3(1):14-8 (1992). |
Zong et al., “Genome-wide detection of single-nucleotide and copy-number variations of a single human cell,” Science. 338(6114):1622-6 (2012). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210032678 A1 | Feb 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62119930 | Feb 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15050948 | Feb 2016 | US |
Child | 16913084 | US |