This invention generally relates to passenger conveyors. More particularly, this invention relates to making a handrail for a passenger conveyor.
Passenger conveyors are well known. A plurality of steps typically follow a loop for carrying individuals between landings at opposite ends of the conveyor. A handrail is often provided so that passengers can stabilize themselves as they travel along on the conveyor.
A typical handrail design has a flat surface that faces upward with rounded edges. The body of the handrail is often made from laminated sheets of material using adhesives, heat or pressure to secure the layers together. Some rubber handrails have been made using a molding process.
One disadvantage to conventional handrail designs is that they do not provide an easily-gripped surface for a wide variety of passengers. A more ergonomically friendly design is desirable. Conventional manufacturing techniques, however, place limitations upon the shape of a handrail because of material cost and the bending stiffness required for a workable handrail.
Another shortcoming of conventional handrail designs is that they typically rely upon a pinching drive arrangement that utilizes friction between a handrail and a drive mechanism that creates a normal force against the handrail sufficient for causing the handrail to move with the steps of the passenger conveyor. Such arrangements often cause marking and scuffing on the outer surface of the handrail. This leads to premature replacement of a handrail.
An alternative drive arrangement is shown in Japanese Patent No. 2735453. In that document, rack teeth are formed on a handrail inner surface to cooperate with a drive mechanism for moving the handrail. While that document shows an improved driving arrangement for a handrail, the overall handrail design and method of manufacture are not ideal. Those skilled in the art are always striving to make improvements.
This invention provides an improved handrail design and manufacturing technique that allows for implementing non-conventional handrail shapes and an improved driving arrangement.
An example method of making a handrail for a passenger conveyor includes co-extruding a plurality of polymer materials to establish a passenger gripping surface from a first polymer material and an inner portion from a second polymer material. One example includes forming a toothed driving surface on the handrail. The toothed surface provides a drive surface for interacting with a drive mechanism that has a corresponding surface configuration.
One example handrail includes a plurality of co-extruded polymer materials. A first one of the polymer materials has properties that establish a gripping surface and a second one of the polymer materials has properties that establish high wear resistance, for example, in an inner portion. The handrail in one example includes a toothed driving surface.
The various features and advantages of this invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of a currently preferred embodiment. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows.
The first polymer material 34 in one example comprises a thermoplastic polyurethane. In this example, the first polymer material 34 forms a relatively hard outer surface 38 that provides a passenger gripping surface.
The second polymer material 36 establishes an inner portion of the handrail 32. Using a second material 36 allows for using a less expensive material on the inside of the handrail, for example. The outer layer or gripping surface 38 must have a certain durability on the surface, for example. The inner portion made of the second polymer material 36 need not have such a characteristic but should have reasonable wear resistance characteristics and cost-savings may be achieved by appropriately selecting one or more second polymer materials 36 to form the inner portion of the handrail 32.
In one example, the second material 36 has a stiffness corresponding to a strength in the range from about 40 to about 50 mega pascal. In one example, the material has a shore hardness in a range from about 80 to about 90. Given this description, those skilled in the art will be able to select an appropriate material to meet their particular needs.
Given the cross-section of the illustrated example, it is expected that relatively more raw material will be required for making the handrail 32 compared to conventional, more flattened-out designs. Using a plurality of materials allows for avoiding increased costs otherwise associated with a circular cross-section compared to the flattened-out designs of the past. In this example, there is some spacing that is not filled between the first polymer material 34 and the second polymer material 36. This spacing is shown in
Additionally, selecting various polymer materials allows for controlling the stiffness and bending characteristics of the handrail so that a desired durability and surface texture can be achieved within given cost constraints. Those skilled in the art who have the benefit of this description will realize what material combinations will work best for their particular situation. Commercially available or custom designed materials may be used.
One feature of the example of
Referring again to
The illustrated example uses co-extrusion of a plurality of polymer materials for forming the handrail. Co-extrusion techniques are known and those skilled in the art who have the benefit of this description will be able to select appropriate materials and techniques for achieving a handrail configuration to meet the needs of their particular situation. The example of
In this example, two chambers following the manifold inlets 62 and 64 each include a width, length and height with a required cross-section to establish the corresponding portions of the handrail. The resulting product 32′ is stretched in the air and then passed through an arrangement for finishing the handrail. In the example of
In the example of
In another example, the toothed driving surface 40 is established during the co-extrusion process. As shown in
The preceding description is exemplary rather than limiting in nature. Variations and modifications to the disclosed examples may become apparent to those skilled in the art that do not necessarily depart from the essence of this invention. The scope of legal protection given to this invention can only be determined by studying the following claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2005/011924 | 4/8/2005 | WO | 00 | 9/6/2007 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2006/110136 | 10/19/2006 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3633725 | Smith | Jan 1972 | A |
3778882 | Cameron et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
4395298 | Wetzel et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4852713 | Tatai et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4946020 | Rivera et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
6237740 | Weatherall et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6673431 | Ledzinski | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6761259 | Onodera et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
7243775 | Novacek et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2735453 | Apr 1998 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080271974 A1 | Nov 2008 | US |