The present invention relates to an aircraft passenger seating arrangement, and to seat units for use in an aircraft passenger seating arrangement.
Aircraft passenger seating arrangements having convertible seat units that have both a seat configuration, and a flat-bed configuration are well-known. These convertible seat units are typically provided in business class or first class cabins of an aircraft. In the seat configuration, the seat unit typically provides a relatively upright seat, whereas in the bed configuration, the seat unit tends to form a substantially planar sleeping surface for supporting the passenger. The seat units shown in GB2326824 (British Airways), WO03013903 (Virgin Atlantic) and U.S. Pat. No. 7,178,871 (British Airways) are examples of such convertible seat units (often referred to as having ‘lie-flat’ seats) that have both a seat configuration, and a flat-bed configuration which offers improved comfort over a reclined seat. Lie-flat seats have been increasingly popular over the last decade or so.
GB2326824 and WO03013903 mentioned above are examples of so-called herringbone arrangements in which the seats are at an angle to the longitudinal axis of the aircraft. By angling the seat units in such a way, the packing efficiency may be increased.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,178,871 mentioned above, and WO 2007/072045 (also British Airways) are examples of seating arrangements having pairs of seat units facing in opposite directions. Such an arrangement may be space-efficient across the width of the cabin because the seating space of one seat unit may extend over the leg space of the adjacent, oppositely facing, seat unit. However, there is an associated problem in such seat designs in that to access seat units that are not directly adjacent an aisle, it tends to be necessary for the passenger to ‘step-over’ the space of a neighbouring passenger. This can detrimentally affect the feeling of privacy and personal space for the passengers in one or both of the relevant seats.
The seat units in WO2009/073244 (BE Aerospace) face the same direction (in each column) and are arranged in parallel. However this arrangement also suffers from the problem that the window seat passenger needs to ‘step-over’ the space of a neighbouring passenger in order to get to their seat unit.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,348,195 (American Airlines) discloses a herringbone arrangement in which alternate seat units face in alternate directions. Each seat has independent access to an adjacent aisle so passengers do not have to step-over the neighbouring seat to access their own seat. The arrangement is for use on a wide-body aircraft and comprises a two-column-wide array along the centre of the aircraft, bounded by aisles either side and with single-width columns against the aircraft sidewall. Such an arrangement with a double-width central column seeks to make use of the relatively large width of the cabin on a wide-body aircraft.
The present invention seeks to provide an improved passenger seating assembly.
According to a first aspect of the invention, there is provided a passenger seating arrangement in an aircraft cabin, the passenger seating arrangement comprising a first column of seat units and second column of seat units, the first and second columns being separated by an aisle, and the columns of seat units and the aisle all extending in a longitudinal direction parallel to the longitudinal axis of the aircraft cabin. Each column comprises a multiplicity of pairs of seat units, the pairs of seat units being arranged consecutively along the longitudinal direction. Each seat unit is configurable between a seating configuration and a flat-bed configuration. Each pair of seat units comprises: an inwardly facing seat unit angled at an acute angle to the longitudinal axis of the aircraft and facing inwardly towards the aisle; an outwardly facing seat unit angled at the same acute angle to the longitudinal axis of the aircraft but facing outwardly away from the aisle; the inwardly and outwardly facing seat units bordering each other along a shared boundary, and wherein the first column is positioned adjacent a sidewall of the aircraft cabin, and the second column is positioned adjacent either a second aisle or the opposing sidewall of the cabin.
In some embodiments, the second column may be positioned adjacent the opposing sidewall of the cabin. Thus, the cabin may be for a single-aisle aircraft. The aisle may run along the longitudinal axis of the cabin. Embodiments of the invention have been found to be especially beneficial for such a single-aisle aircraft because the seating arrangement tends to be space-efficient whilst still facilitating direct access to each seat unit from the aisle.
In some embodiments, the second column may be positioned adjacent a second aisle. The arrangement may further comprises a third column of pairs of seat units, between the opposing sidewall and the second aisle. The third column may comprise any or all the features of the first column. Thus, the cabin may be for a twin-aisle aircraft, and the seating arrangement may comprise three equal-width columns of pairs of seat units extending along the cabin. Having equal-width columns in both the centre and the sides of the cabin has been found to be more space-efficient than some arrangements having a double-width central column (e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 8,348,195). Furthermore, such an arrangement may allow passengers of seat units in the central column to access the seat units from either aisle.
Each seat unit is configurable between a seating configuration and a flat-bed configuration. This type of re-configurable seat unit per se is well known in aircraft seating, especially in business class seating. Such a seat unit may sometimes be referred to as a “lie-flat seat”.
Each seat unit may comprise a central axis. The central axis preferably extends through the centre of the seat (for example it may bisect a seat pan and/or back-rest of the seat when in the seating configuration). The central axis of each seat unit is preferably fixed (for example the seat units preferably do not comprise swivel seats). The angle of the seat unit is preferably defined as the angle between the central axis and the longitudinal axis of the aircraft.
The inwardly and outwardly facing seat units in each pair of seat units are at substantially the same acute angle to the longitudinal axis of the aircraft. It will be appreciated that the angle is being measured relative to the axes in question and is measured in a consistent manner for both seat units. Thus the direction in which the angle is measured is not related to the orientation of the respective seat unit as such.
In each column the multiplicity of pairs of seat units are preferably identical. Thus, each column is preferably formed by a repeating pattern of identical pairs of seat units. The pairs of seats units are preferably adjacent one another along the longitudinal direction. Within a column, the pairs of seat units are arranged in the same orientation.
The shared boundary may comprise an intra-pair privacy screen extending between the seat units in each pair. The shared boundary may extend in a direction parallel to each seat unit. For example, the shared boundary may extend at the acute angle to the longitudinal axis of the aircraft.
Each seat unit may comprise a main body. Each seat unit may comprise a foot receiving end.
The main body may comprise moveable seating elements arranged such that when the seat unit is in the seating configuration the seating elements form a passenger seat but when the seat unit is in the flat-bed configuration, the seating elements form a substantially flat sleeping surface. The moveable seating elements may, for example, comprise a seat pan, a seat back, and/or a footrest. In some embodiments, the moveable seating elements may form substantially all of the sleeping surface when the seat unit is in the flat-bed configuration. In other embodiments, the moveable elements need not necessarily form all of the sleeping surface when the seat unit is in the flat-bed configuration. For example, in some embodiments of the invention, each seat unit may comprises an ancillary bed surface. In the flat-bed configuration, the ancillary bed surface may form part of the sleeping surface in conjunction with the moveable seating elements. The ancillary bed surface may be fixed. The ancillary bed surface may be removeable (for example it may be created by an insert element). The ancillary bed surface may be at a height such that it is co-planar with the flat sleeping surface formed by seating elements when the seat unit is in the flat-bed configuration. The ancillary bed surface may form an extension of the flat sleeping surface formed by seating elements when the seat unit is in the flat-bed configuration. A seat unit may comprise such an ancillary bed surface at a foot receiving end of the seat unit. Alternatively or additionally, the seat unit may comprise such an ancillary bed surface at a head receiving end of the seat unit.
The foot receiving end may comprise a wall extending along at least part of a perimeter of the foot receiving end. The end wall may define a partially enclosed space for receiving a passenger's feet when the seat unit is in the flat-bed configuration.
In some embodiments of the invention, the foot receiving end may comprise an ancillary bed surface. The ancillary bed surface may be coplanar with the sleeping surface when the seat unit is in the flat-bed configuration, such that the ancillary bed surface acts as a bed-extension surface. The ancillary bed surface may be fixed. The ancillary bed surface may be suitable as a foot rest when the seat unit is in a seating configuration. For example, the foot-receiving end may comprise an ottoman.
In other embodiments the foot receiving end may not have any ancillary bed surface. For example, it may merely receive a surface (for example one of the moveable seating elements) that forms part of the main body and extends into the foot receiving end when the seat unit is in the flat-bed configuration.
The foot receiving end may comprise an upper table surface. The upper table surface may be located at a height greater than the height of the flat sleeping surface when the seat unit is in the flat-bed configuration. The upper table surface may be for use by the passenger in the adjacent seat unit in the adjacent pair of seat units. Such an arrangement has been found to provide an especially efficient use of space as the foot receiving end can effectively provide a functional benefit to two seat units (i.e. to receive the passenger's feet for one seat unit, and to provide a table surface for another passenger). The foot receiving end may comprise a divider shielding and/or preventing access, to the upper table surface from/by a passenger of that seat unit. Such an arrangement provides a clear delimitation of space between the passengers of the seat units. An in-flight entertainment (IFE) display may be associated with the divider.
Each column may comprise a plurality of main body modules, and a plurality of foot modules. Each column may comprise a multiplicity of main body modules, and a multiplicity of foot modules. Each of the modules may be a unitary structure. Each main body module may be formed of the main bodies of each of the seat units in a pair of seat units. The main bodies of each of the seat units in a pair may be joined along the shared boundary. Each foot module may comprise the foot receiving end of an inwardly facing seat unit of one pair of seat units, and the foot receiving end of the outwardly facing seat unit in an adjacent pair of seat units. The main body modules and the foot modules may be independent structures. The main body modules and the foot modules may be alternately located along the longitudinal direction of each column. Having the above-mentioned modules has been found to be beneficial because it enables each type of module to be certified independently of the other. The foot modules may be certified to a first g-level (e.g. 9-g). The main body modules may be certified to a second, higher, g-level (e.g. 16-g). This may enable the structure of the foot module to be simplified relative to an arrangement in which it is integral with a main body module.
Each foot module may comprise an inter-pair privacy screen extending between the two foot receiving ends. The inter-pair privacy screen may be non-parallel to the seat units. For example, the inter-pair privacy screen may be non-parallel to the shared boundary between the seat units of a pair and/or to the central axis of the seat units. The inter-pair privacy screen is preferably at a greater angle to the longitudinal axis of the aircraft than the acute angle (at which the seat units are angled to the longitudinal axis of the aircraft). Such an arrangement has been found to be beneficial as it may enable a relatively wide spacing to be created between the foot-receiving end of one seat unit and the main body of an adjacent seat unit in an adjacent pair. This may be used to provide a relatively wide access path and/or provide a minimum width access path but with more closely packed seat units.
The foot receiving end may be laterally offset from the central axis of the seat unit. The offset may be in a direction away from the adjacent seat unit in the adjacent pair of seat units, such that it facilitates access to that adjacent seat unit in the adjacent pair. The offset may be characterised by a notional line defining the maximum length of the seat unit (for example the maximum bed length in the flat-bed configuration) being non-parallel to the central axis of the seat unit. Such an arrangement may be used to provide a relatively wide access path and/or provide a minimum width access path by with more closely packed seat units.
Each main body may comprise a shroud located behind the seat back. The shroud may extending to a first height from the aisle floor. The end wall of the foot receiving end may extend to a second, lower height from the aisle floor. The minimum lateral distance across the aisle between shrouds of the outwardly facing seat units in each column, may be greater than the minimum lateral distance across the aisle between the end walls of the inwardly facing seat unit in each column. Such an arrangement takes advantage of the fact that aircraft safety regulations require a different (smaller) minimum aisle width at and close to the floor-level of the aisle, compared with at a higher level above the floor. The seat units in each pair of seat units are preferably substantially identical (except for orientation). In such embodiments, a consequence of the above-mentioned use of aisle width is that the maximum lateral width across the column between end walls of the foot receiving ends (of adjacent inward and outwardly facing seat units), may be greater than the maximum lateral width between shrouds (of adjacent inward and outwardly facing seat units). Thus, although having different widths at different heights is known per se to improve the use of the space surrounding the aisle, this feature has been found to provide an additional, and surprising, benefit in embodiments of the present invention. In particular, since in embodiments of the present invention the pairs of seat units have inwardly and outwardly facing seat units, the end wall of the foot receiving end of the outwardly facing seat units may accordingly extend (laterally) a further distance than an adjacent shroud. In at least the first column, this means the foot receiving end extends closer to the aircraft sidewall than the shroud of the inwardly facing seat units. This maximises the use of the extra space that is present closer to the floor due to the curvature of the sidewall.
The exact value of the acute angle of the seats relative to the longitudinal axis of the aircraft may depend on the size of the aircraft cabin in question. However, the present invention has recognised certain beneficial ranges of acute angle. The acute angle is at least 30 degrees or more, and more preferably the acute angle is at least 34 degrees or more. The acute angle may be at least 45 degrees or more. The acute angle may be up to 50 degrees. The acute angle may be in the range of between 34 and 50 degrees.
Each column is preferably two seat units-wide. The main body of one seat unit a pair may be beside the main body of the other seat unit in the pair. Thus, the total dimension of the pair of main bodies in the longitudinal direction may be substantially equal to the dimension of each main body in the longitudinal direction. The main body of one seat unit a pair may be offset (in the longitudinal direction) with respect to the main body of the other seat unit in the pair. Thus, the total dimension of the pair of main bodies in the longitudinal direction may be greater than the dimension of each main body in the longitudinal direction. The total dimension of the pair of main bodies in the longitudinal direction may be no more than 25% greater than the dimension of each main body in the longitudinal direction. The total dimension of the pair of main bodies in the longitudinal direction may be no more than 20% greater than the dimension of each main body in the longitudinal direction. The total dimension of the pair of main bodies in the longitudinal direction may be no more than 10% greater than the dimension of each main body in the longitudinal direction.
In some embodiments of the invention, the pairs of seat units in the first column are orientated in a mirror image, across the longitudinal axis of the aisle, of the pairs of seat units in the second column. For example, the outwardly facing seat units may all be facing one of forwards or backwards, and the inwardly facing seat units may all be facing the other of forwards or backwards. The pairs of seat units may be orientated in a mirror image, but may still be offset in a longitudinal direction.
In other embodiments of the invention, the pairs of seat units in the first column may be orientated in the same direction as the pairs of seat units in the second column. Thus, the outwardly facing seat units in one column may be facing one of forwards or backwards, and the outwardly facing seat units in the other column may be facing the other of forwards or backwards. Equally, the inwardly facing seat units in one column may be facing one of forwards or backwards, and the inwardly facing seat units in the other column may be facing the other of forwards or backwards.
It will be appreciated that the inward/outward facing of the seat units refers to their orientation relative to the aisle (i.e. whether the passenger would be facing towards or away from the aisle). In contrast, the forward/backward facing of the seat units refers to their orientation relative to the direction of travel of the aircraft (i.e. whether the passenger would be facing towards the front of the aircraft or towards the rear of the aircraft).
Each pair of seat units within a column is preferably substantially identical. Each pair of seat units in one column is preferably substantially identical to each pair of seat units in another column (although the orientation of the pairs of seat units may differ in some embodiments). Each column of seat units extends in a longitudinal direction. The lateral extent of each seat units within each pair of seat units (i.e. the width perpendicular to the longitudinal direction) is preferably equal. Thus, the seat units in each pair preferably extend to a shared, substantially linear, longitudinal boundary along the aisle.
Although the seat units within each pair of seat units face in opposing directions, relative to the aisle, the seat units within that pair may be substantially identical (i.e. of the same width, length, construction etc.). The length of the flat sleeping surface provided by each seat unit in a pair (when the seat unit is in the flat-bed configuration) may be substantially identical.
According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided a passenger seating arrangement in a cabin of a single aisle aircraft, the passenger seating arrangement comprising: a first column of seat units located adjacent a sidewall of the aircraft cabin on one side and adjacent the aisle on the other side and a second column of seat units located adjacent the opposing sidewall of the aircraft cabin on one side and adjacent the aisle on the other side, the columns of seat units and the aisle all extending in a longitudinal direction parallel to the longitudinal axis of the aircraft cabin, and wherein each column comprises a multiplicity of pairs of seat units located along the length of each column, each seat unit being configurable between a seating configuration and a flat-bed configuration, wherein each pair of seat units comprises substantially identical, but oppositely oriented seat units, such that one seat unit is inwardly facing, angled at an acute angle to the longitudinal direction and the other seat unit is outwardly facing angled at the acute angle to the longitudinal direction but in the opposite direction.
According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided a passenger seating arrangement in a cabin of a twin-aisle aircraft, the passenger seating arrangement comprising: a first column of seat units located adjacent a sidewall of the aircraft cabin on one side and adjacent a first aisle on the other side; a second column of seat units located along the longitudinal axis of the cabin and being adjacent the first aisle on one side, and being adjacent a second aisle on the other side, and a third column of seat units located adjacent the opposing sidewall of the aircraft cabin on one side and adjacent the second aisle on the other side; the columns of seat units and the aisles all extending in a longitudinal direction parallel to the longitudinal axis of the aircraft cabin, and wherein each column comprises a multiplicity of pairs of seat units located along the length of each column, each seat unit being configurable between a seating configuration and a flat-bed configuration, wherein each pair of seat units comprises substantially identical, but oppositely oriented seat units, such that one seat unit is inwardly facing, angled at an acute angle to the longitudinal direction and the other seat unit is outwardly facing angled at the acute angle to the longitudinal direction but in the opposite direction.
According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided a passenger seating arrangement for use in any aspect described herein. The seating arrangement may comprise a first column of seat units and second column of seat units, the first and second columns being separated by an aisle width, and the columns of seat units and the aisle all extending in a longitudinal direction, and wherein each column comprises a multiplicity of pairs of seat units, the pairs of seat units being arranged consecutively along the longitudinal direction, each seat unit being configurable between a seating configuration and a flat-bed configuration, wherein each pair of seat units comprises: an inwardly facing seat unit angled at an acute angle to the longitudinal axis of the aircraft and facing inwardly towards the aisle; an outwardly facing seat unit angled at the acute angle to the longitudinal axis of the aircraft but facing outwardly away from the aisle. The inwardly and outwardly facing seat units may border each other along a shared boundary. The first column is for positioning adjacent a sidewall of the aircraft cabin, and the second column is for positioning adjacent either a second aisle or the opposing sidewall of the cabin.
According to yet another aspect of the invention, there is provided a pair of seat units for use as one of the pairs of seat units in the seating arrangements described herein. The pair of seat units is suitable for arranging adjacent to one another along a longitudinal direction, and wherein: each seat unit is configurable between a seating configuration and a flat-bed configuration, and the pair of seat units comprises: an inwardly facing seat unit angled at an acute angle to the longitudinal axis of the aircraft and facing inwardly towards an aisle; an outwardly facing seat unit angled at the acute angle to the longitudinal axis of the aircraft but facing outwardly away from the aisle; the inwardly and outwardly facing seat units may border each other along a shared boundary.
It will be appreciated that any features described with reference to one aspect of the invention are equally applicable to any other aspect of the invention, and vice versa. It will also be appreciated that reference above to one or more features of a seat unit may be applicable to any or all of the other seat units described herein.
Various embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying schematic drawings of which:
The passenger seating arrangement 1 comprises a first column of seat units C1 and second column of seat units C2. The first and second columns C1, C2 are separated by an aisle 5 aligned with the longitudinal axis 6 of the cabin. As is most clearly indicated in
Referring back to
In each column C1, C2, the pairs 9 of seat units are arranged adjacent to one another along the longitudinal direction (i.e. neighbouring pairs 9 of seat units are located along the length of each column C1, C2).
Referring now to
The angle of the seat unit to the longitudinal direction is measured by the angle that the central seat unit axis 13 makes with the longitudinal direction L (and the aisle axis 6). The central axis of a seat unit is the axis that bisects the seat body of the respective seat unit 11a/11b.
The inwardly facing seat unit 11a faces backwards (relative to the direction of flight F (see
The inwardly facing seat unit 11a and outwardly facing seat unit 11b in each pair 9 of seat units, border each other along an intra-pair privacy screen 15 that lies along a shared boundary. That boundary runs parallel to the central axis 13 of the seat units (i.e. at 42.7 degrees to the longitudinal direction L). The privacy screen 15 is selectively retractable such that it can be raised or lowered depending on whether passengers in the seat units wish to interact with each other. In
Each seat unit 11a, 11b comprises a main body 23 and a foot receiving end 25. The main body 23 has a moveable seat pan 17, movable back rest 19 and moveable leg support 21. A shroud 22 surrounds the back rest 19. The foot receiving end 25 is spaced apart from the main body 23 and is in the form of a curved end wall 26 extending from the cabin floor having an upper table surface 27. The foot receiving end does not comprise an ottoman. Instead, the end wall 26 defines a partially enclosed space into which the passenger may insert their feet when the seat unit is in the flat-bed configuration. A low divider 28 shields the table surface 27 from the passenger in that seat unit 11a, 11b, but the table surface 27 is instead accessible to the passenger in the adjacent seat unit, thereby providing a convenient surface to one side of their seat unit.
Each seat unit 11a, 11b is configurable between a seating configuration and a flat-bed configuration. In the seating configuration (shown for the seat units in
Firstly, in the first embodiment of the invention, the seating arrangement 1 is provided in a single aisle aircraft. Each column C1, C2 borders the aisle 5 on one side and the aircraft sidewall on the other side. Providing columns C1, C2 of pairs 9 of seat units having alternately facing inward and outward seats units 11a, 11b (relative to the aisle) has been found to be an especially space-efficient way of providing passenger seating on a single aisle aircraft, without compromising passenger access to each seat unit.
Secondly, as is most clearly shown in the expanded view in
The end wall 26 of the foot receiving end is asymmetrical (about the centre line of the foot receiving end). On one side, it smoothly blends into an inter-pair privacy screen 35, which is orientated at angle to the central axis 13 of the seat units 11a, 11b. Such an arrangement has been found to be beneficial as it may enable a relatively wide spacing to be created between the foot-receiving end 25 of one seat unit and the main body 23 of an adjacent seat unit in an adjacent pair.
In the first embodiment of the invention, the pairs of seat units 9 are mirror images about a plane of symmetry along the longitudinal axis 6 of the cabin. In contrast, in the second embodiment of the invention, the pairs 109 of seat units in the first column C1 are orientated in the same direction as the pairs of seat units 109 in the second column C2. The shrouds 122 of opposing outwardly facing seats 111b are opposite one another, and the opposing end walls 126 of the opposing foot receiving ends 125 are opposite one another, across the aisle 105.
The central column C2 of pairs 309 of seat units is only two-seat units wide (i.e. the same width as the other columns C1, C3). Having equal-width columns in both the centre and the sides of the cabin has been found to be more space-efficient than some known twin-aisle arrangements, which tend to have a double-width central column of seat units. Furthermore, such an arrangement allows passengers of seat units in the central column to access the seat units from either aisle.
In the seating arrangement 301 of the fourth embodiment, the width W2 of the access path between the foot receiving end 325 of the inwardly facing seats 311a and the shroud 322 of the outwardly facing seat units 311b in each pair is relatively large (13 inches), whereas the width W1 of the access path between the foot receiving end of the inwardly facing seats 311a and the seat pan 317 of the outwardly facing seat units 311b of the adjacent pair is 9.14 inches.
The fourth embodiment also provides an especially efficient use of the cabin width:
Whilst the present invention has been described and illustrated with reference to particular embodiments, it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that the invention lends itself to many different variations not specifically illustrated herein. Where in the foregoing description, integers or elements are mentioned which have known, obvious or foreseeable equivalents, then such equivalents are herein incorporated as if individually set forth. Reference should be made to the claims for determining the true scope of the present invention, which should be construed so as to encompass any such equivalents. It will also be appreciated by the reader that integers or features of the invention that are described as preferable, advantageous, convenient or the like are optional and do not limit the scope of the independent claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1618270.1 | Oct 2016 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2017/053232 | 10/26/2017 | WO | 00 |