The present invention generally relates to spray applicators for forming and projecting a CO2 Composite Spray (a trademark of CleanLogix LLC). More specifically, the present invention relates to a passive electrostatic spray nozzle and spray applicator assembly employing air, solid carbon dioxide, and additive particles such as organic solvents, coatings, paints, nanoparticles, microabrasives, and lubricants.
Use of CO2 composite sprays for cleaning, cooling and/or lubrication is widely known in the art. For example, CO2 composite sprays are typically employed during hard machining processes requiring cleaning, selective thermal control, and/or lubrication during turning, precision abrasive grinding, or dicing operations. In these applications, CO2 composite sprays are employed to extend cutting tool or abrasive wheel life, and to improve productivity, dimensional tolerance, and surface finish.
There exist in the art several examples of CO2 spray applicators which are employed to direct a CO2 spray onto substrates, work pieces, and the like, in manufacturing or industrial processes. Such examples include U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,389,820, 4,806,171 and 5,725,154. Each of the aforementioned, however, have shortcomings in the application of sprays for cleaning, cooling and lubricating purposes, more especially the formation and application of CO2 composite sprays beneficial for cooling and lubricating purposes.
For example, efficient and effective application of CO2 composite sprays to machined substrates presents several challenges. When sufficiently high spray velocities are employed to provide enough energy to reach cutting zone surfaces, the majority of the spray tends to deflect from or stream around the cutting zone surfaces rather than impinge upon them. When low velocity sprays are employed, critical surfaces with recesses or complex surfaces cannot be penetrated effectively. For example, during application of CO2-based cooling-lubricating sprays it is observed that oil additive agglomerates into very large precipitations during transition from spray nozzles to surfaces. This phenomenon interferes with the even distribution of both CO2 coolant particles and oil-based lubricant on machined surfaces and causes a large portion of the atomized spray to miss the substrate entirely if positioned at a location too far away from the substrate being machined, wasting a portion of the applied spray. This phenomenon occurs because the lubricating additive, such as an oil, and a cooling component, solid carbon dioxide particles, have certain physicochemical properties which are in complete opposition—namely high melt point and extremely low temperature, respectively. The temperature of the CO2 particles (i.e., coolant) cause a flowing lubricant additive to solidify or gel prematurely before a uniform particle size and spray distribution can be established within the spray. This phenomenon inhibits uniform and homogenous dispersions. This is particularly the case when the mixing between the CO2 solid particles and additive particles occurs within the nozzle or near the nozzle tip, resulting in inconsistent spray patterns and chemistry, and the nozzle becoming clogged with frozen and agglomerated oil and additives.
The prior art contains several examples of CO2 spray application techniques for incorporating beneficial additives into a CO2 composite spray. Examples include the addition of organic solvent additives to enhance spray cleaning performance, lubricant additives to enhance machining performance, and plasma additives to enhance surface modification for adhesive bonding. Examples of prior art in this regard include U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,409,418, 7,451,941, 7,389,941 and 9,352,355. In each of the aforementioned examples, an additive fluid comprising ions, solvent, oil, or a plasma, respectively, is added directly into a centrally disposed CO2 particle spray using an injection means that is integrated with the CO2 spray nozzle device, and in some cases include a means for actively charging the additive particles using high voltage and an electrode to enhance additive particle attraction, mixing and atomization. However, as already noted this type of injection scheme introduces constraints for spray additives which are inherently incompatible with the physicochemistry of the CO2 spray at or near the spray forming nozzle. For example, high spray pressure and velocity, very low temperature, and passive electrostatic charging within the CO2 particle nozzle body and exit introduce flow and mixing constraints for high melt point oils. High molecular weight natural oils such as soybean and canola oil provide the most superior lubrication qualities for machining applications but will gel or solidify at temperatures much higher than those present within or near the CO2 particle nozzle exit. Exacerbating this problem is electrostatic fields and charges present during the formation and ejection of CO2 particles within and from the nozzle. Spray charging using a high voltage electrode or passively charging (tribocharging) the additive and/or CO2 particles, respectively, electrostatically charges and coalesces the subcooled high melting point oil films into large and sticky gels or masses near or within the nozzle tip which inhibits flow and injection into the CO2 particle stream. Moreover, these larger additive particle masses once injected into the cold CO2 particle stream and projected at a target surface inhibit gap penetration during to very low surface area, for example within a cutting zone comprising cutting tool, workpiece and chip crevice. The result is a spray with compositional variance over time—large particle masses with low surface area or a complete lack of lubricating particles. Moreover, the additive injection apparatus and methods of the prior art require an individual additive injection scheme for each CO2 spray nozzle necessitating more complicated multi-spray configuration schemes in applications requiring larger aerial and radials spray densities for increased application productivity or utility.
An apparatus for producing an electrostatically charged and homogeneous CO2 composite spray containing an additive for use on a substrate surface comprising: multiple nozzle electrodes can be positioned axis symmetrically about an additive injection nozzle; said nozzle electrodes can comprise an elongated body with a nozzle tip with a center through hole, and arising from the center through hole, there can be multiple or at least three axisymmetric through ports; the multiple or at least three through ports can form three landing guides 221 or support portions for centering and positioning an adjustable expansion tube assembly; the adjustable expansion tube assembly can comprise a first capillary within a second capillary; the first and the second capillaries can be adjustable within the center through hole; the additive injection nozzle can comprise a through ported and grounded additive injection nozzle body containing an additive delivery tube, and the grounded additive injection nozzle body can flow air to form an air-additive aerosol; whereby CO2 particles are flowed through the adjustable expansion tube assembly to create an electrostatic charge, which is shunted to the three landing guides 221 or support portions to electrostatically charge the nozzle electrodes, and the CO2 particles then mix with air to form air-CO2 aerosol; the electrostatically charged nozzle electrodes and the air-CO2 aerosol can passively charge the air-additive aerosol; the air-additive aerosol and the air-CO2 aerosol combine away from the nozzles to form the electrostatically charged air-additive-CO2 aerosol, which is projected at the substrate surface, whereby the CO2 particles and the additive interact to form the electrostatically charged and homogeneous CO2 composite spray containing an additive mixture in the space between the nozzles and the substrate surface; and the electrostatically charged and homogeneous CO2 composite spray containing an additive can be projected at the substrate surface; the least two nozzle electrodes can be arranged axis symmetrically about the additive injection nozzle; the additive can comprise flowable organic and inorganic liquids and solids; the substrate surface can be a cutting zone; the additive is a machining lubricant.
An apparatus for producing an electrostatically charged and homogeneous CO2 composite spray containing an additive for use on a substrate surface comprising: multiple nozzle electrodes positioned axis symmetrically about an additive injection nozzle; said nozzle electrodes comprising an elongated body with a nozzle tip with a center through hole, and arising from the center through hole are multiple axisymmetric through ports; near or proximate to said multiple through ports are landing guides for centering and positioning an adjustable expansion tube assembly; the adjustable expansion tube assembly comprises a first capillary within a second capillary; the first and the second capillaries are adjustable within the center through hole; the additive injection nozzle comprising a through ported and grounded additive injection nozzle body containing an additive delivery tube, and the grounded additive injection nozzle body flows air to form an air-additive aerosol; whereby CO2 particles are flowed through the adjustable expansion tube assembly to create an electrostatic charge, which is shunted to the landing guides to electrostatically charge the nozzle electrodes, and the CO2 particles then mix with air to form air-CO2 aerosol; the electrostatically charged nozzle electrodes and the air-CO2 aerosol passively charge the air-additive aerosol; the air-additive aerosol and the air-CO2 aerosol combine away from the nozzles to form the electrostatically charged air-additive-CO2 aerosol, which is projected at the substrate surface, whereby the CO2 particles and the additive interact to form the electrostatically charged and homogeneous CO2 composite spray containing an additive mixture in the space between the nozzles and the substrate surface; and the electrostatically charged and homogeneous CO2 composite spray containing an additive is projected at the substrate surface. Arising from the center through hole, there can be multiple or at least three axisymmetric through ports; and said multiple or at least three through ports form three landing guides for centering and positioning an adjustable expansion tube assembly; at least two nozzle electrodes are arranged axis symmetrically about the additive injection nozzle; the additive comprises flowable organic and inorganic liquids and solids; the substrate surface is a cutting zone; and the additive is a machining lubricant.
A nozzle electrode apparatus for producing an electrostatic field comprising: an elongated body with a nozzle tip with a center through hole, and arising from the center through hole are at least three axisymmetric through ports; said at least three through ports forming three landing guides for positioning an adjustable expansion tube assembly; the adjustable expansion tube assembly comprises a first capillary within a second capillary; the first and the second capillaries are adjustable in position within the through ported center hole; and whereby CO2 particles are flowed through the adjustable expansion tube assembly to create an electrostatic charge, which is shunted to the three landing guides to electrostatically charge the nozzle electrode; the apparatus can be constructed of semi-conductive material or metal; can be between 0.5 and 6.0 inches in length; and can be shunted to earth ground.
A method for treating a surface using an apparatus for producing an electrostatically charged and homogeneous CO2 composite spray containing an additive for use on a substrate surface comprising: multiple nozzle electrodes positioned axis symmetrically about an additive injection nozzle; said nozzle electrodes comprising an elongated body with a nozzle tip with a center through hole, and arising from the center through hole are multiple axisymmetric through ports; proximate to said multiple through ports are landing guides for centering and positioning an adjustable expansion tube assembly; the adjustable expansion tube assembly comprises a first capillary within a second capillary; the first and the second capillaries are adjustable within the center through hole; the additive injection nozzle comprising a through ported and grounded additive injection nozzle body containing an additive delivery tube, and the grounded additive injection nozzle body flows air to form an air-additive aerosol; whereby CO2 particles are flowed through the adjustable expansion tube assembly to create an electrostatic charge, which is shunted to the landing guides to electrostatically charge the nozzle electrodes, and the CO2 particles then mix with air to form air-CO2 aerosol; the electrostatically charged nozzle electrodes and the air-CO2 aerosol passively charge the air-additive aerosol; the air-additive aerosol and the air-CO2 aerosol combine away from the nozzles to form the electrostatically charged air-additive-CO2 aerosol, which is projected at the substrate surface, whereby the CO2 particles and the additive interact to form the electrostatically charged and homogeneous CO2 composite spray containing an additive mixture in the space between the nozzles and the substrate surface; and the electrostatically charged and homogeneous CO2 composite spray containing an additive is projected at the substrate surface, comprising the steps: positioning the apparatus at a first position away from the substrate surface; coating the substrate surface with the electrostatically charged and homogeneous CO2 composite spray containing the additive; stopping the coating of the substrate service with the electrostatically charged and homogeneous CO2 composite spray containing the additive; positioning the apparatus to a second position; and removing the additive from substrate surface by applying the electrostatically charged and homogeneous CO2 composite spray without the additive. This method also has the first position is between 6 and 18 inches from the substrate surface; a soak period of between 1 and 600 seconds follows the application of the electrostatically charged and homogeneous CO2 composite spray containing the additive at the first position; the second position is between 0.5 and 6 inches from the substrate surface; the additive comprises flowable organic and inorganic liquids and solids; the substrate surface is a manufactured surface.
The present aspect provides an apparatus for producing an electrostatically charged and homogeneous CO2 composite spray containing an additive. The present invention overcomes the additive mixing and spray projection constraints of the prior art by positioning an additive injection and atomization nozzle into the center of and coaxial with two or more axis-symmetrically positioned and passively charged CO2 composite spray nozzles. The novel cluster spray arrangement with electrostatic field and velocity driven gradients for mixing additive and CO2 particles, and induced airflow to assist composite spray propulsion and delivery enables the formation of virtually any variety of CO2 composite fluid spray compositions. Uniquely, a multi-component CO2 composite fluid spray of the present invention is formed in space during transit to a target substrate, separated from the CO2 and additive particle injection means, to eliminate interferences introduced by phase change and direct contact charging phenomenon. Axis-symmetrically clustered CO2 sprays surrounding a centrally positioned additive spray flow creates adjustable and uniform electrostatic field and velocity gradients.
The present invention eliminates constraints imposed by the various physicochemical differences between additive spray chemistry and CO2 spray chemistry. Any variety of fluid-entrained or flowable microscopic solids, light and viscous liquids, volatile and condensable gases, ionic, aqueous and non-aqueous liquids, and blends of same may be used. Moreover, discrete additives or blends of high boiling liquids, high melt point compounds, nanoparticles, ionic compounds, ionized fluids, ozonized fluids, dispersions, or suspensions may be used. Still moreover, the usefulness of a CO2 composite spray is extended with the present invention. For example the present invention may be used to apply beneficial surface coatings such as rust prevention agents, primers, and paints immediately following CO2 composite spray cleaning operations.
Another aspect of the present invention is to provide an apparatus and method for providing higher aerial and radial spray densities for a CO2 composite spray to improve spray process productivity. Advantages of CO2 composite sprays as compared to conventional CO2 snow sprays is the ability to adjust CO2 particle-in-propellant gas concentration, spray pressure, and spray mixture temperature. However, a limitation is low aerial and radial spray densities—spray area—for a CO2 spray applicator. This limits productivity in many industrial applications and the current technique used to overcome this limitation is to employ multi-ported wide-spray nozzle arrays. However as already discussed, conventional means for adding beneficial additives makes this type of arrangement very complicated and incompatible with high melt point additive chemistries.
Another aspect of the present invention is to provide a novel electrical discharge machined (EDM) CO2 composite spray mixing nozzle apparatus that is used to selectively position an adjustable CO2 particle injection assembly (i.e., U.S. Pat. No. 9,221,057,
In still another aspect of the present invention, a surface pretreatment coating operation is followed by a precision cleaning operation. In certain cleaning applications surface contamination can be very difficult to remove using a CO2 composite spray alone. The present invention teaches an exemplary pretreatment process for applying a uniform coat of (preferably) high boiling pretreat agents which first solubilize (or otherwise denature) the complex surface contaminant prior to or simultaneously during spray cleaning with a CO2 composite spray.
Finally, the present invention is useful for forming hybrid CO2 composite sprays using virtually any additive chemistry that intensifies a particular spray application such as precision cleaning, hard machining, precision abrasive grinding, adhesive bonding, or surface disinfection. The novel CO2 composite spray applicator of the present invention has been developed to work most efficiently with CO2 composite spray generation systems developed by the first named inventor. Preferred CO2 composite spray generation systems for employing the present invention include U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,725,154, 7,451,941, and 9,221,067, and by reference to same are incorporated into the present invention in their entirety. The present invention introduces such refinements. In its preferred embodiments, the present invention has several aspects or facets that can be used independently, although they are preferably employed together to optimize their benefits. All of the foregoing operational principles and advantages of the present invention will be more fully appreciated upon consideration of the following detailed description, with reference to the appended drawings.
The present invention is an electrostatic spray application apparatus and method for producing an electrostatically charged and homogeneous CO2 composite spray mixture containing an additive and simultaneously projecting at a substrate surface. The CO2 composite spray mixture is formed in the space between CO2 and additive mixing nozzles and a substrate surface. The CO2 composite spray mixture is a composite fluid having a variably-controlled aerial and radial spray density comprising pressure- and temperature-regulated propellant gas (i.e., compressed air), CO2 particles, and additive particles. The invention comprises two or more circumferential and high velocity air streams containing passively charged CO2 particles which are positioned axis-symmetrically and coaxially about an inner and lower velocity injection air stream containing one or more additives to form a spray cluster. One or more spray clusters may be used to form a larger spray cluster configuration. The axis-symmetrical CO2 particle-air streams are passively tribocharged during formation and the spray clustering arrangement creates a significant electrostatic field and Coanda air mass flow between and surrounding the coaxial flow streams. Within the spray cluster, the centrally-positioned additive-air stream exerts a small viscous drag and behaves as an anode relative to the circumferential CO2 particle-air streams behaving as cathodes which causes the charged CO2 particle-air stream and additive-air stream particles to coalesce in space under the influence of the polarized electrostatic field created within the space between them to form a uniform and hybrid air-CO2-additive particle spray stream. Using the present invention, any variety of hybrid air-CO2-additive particle spray streams may be created for industrial manufacturing applications such as coating, cleaning, disinfecting, and cooling-lubrication.
A significant drawback of the exemplary coaxial spray applicator as shown and described under U.S. Pat. No. 7,451,941 (
As with the coaxial mixing nozzle of U.S. Pat. No. 7,451,941 described under
The generation and projection of a CO2 spray produces electrostatic charging. This tribocharging phenomenon is caused by contact of high velocity and sublimating CO2 particles (a dielectric) with surfaces having a different work functions, for example polyetheretherketone (PEEK) delivery capillary tubes and metallic mixing nozzles used to fabricate a CO2 composite spray applicator. Measures to mitigate electrostatic charge build-up and already discussed herein by reference to the prior art include the injection of ionized gases directly or indirectly into the CO2 spray as well as nozzle grounding or shunting. However, even with these measures in place the CO2 particle spray continues to tribocharge as it expands and moves turbulently within the atmosphere during its trajectory to a substrate surface. Moreover, even a relatively charge-neutral CO2 spray will tribocharge a substrate surface during impingement. As such, it is known to those skilled in the art that the best remedy for mitigating electrostatic charge on the substrate surface during a CO2 spray treatment is through substrate grounding or shunting means, and through the projection of a separate ionizing fluid or radiation at the substrate during spray treatment. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 9,352,355 co-developed by the first named inventor is an exemplary surface shunting means using an atmospheric plasma (electrically conductive treatment fluid) to contact both the CO2 composite spray and substrate surface simultaneously during operation. Surface charge build-up is mitigated by draining tribocharge from the contacting surfaces directly into the plasma plume. The '355 apparatus and method is a hybrid treatment process that provides effective surface cleaning and modification while simultaneously controlling electrostatic charging of treatment spray and treated surfaces.
In summary, a direct charging method for intensifying the formation of an electrostatically-atomized additive in a CO2 composite spray is taught by the first named inventor in U.S. Pat. No. 7,389,941 and involves the application of a high voltage (HV) to the flowable additive using a HV power supply and wire. The additive mixture becomes highly charged prior to injection into the Coanda nozzle and subsequent mixing into the tribocharged CO2 composite spray. Also taught by the first named inventor in U.S. Pat. No. 7,451,941 is an indirect charging method which involves injecting additive directly into the tribocharged CO2 composite spray as it is being formed to form a passively charged additive in the CO2 composite spray. However it is evident from the discussion of the prior art, the co-joined constraints by both of these techniques, and particularly when using high melt point additives, are two-fold: (1) uncontrolled phase change of additive due to the very low CO2 particle-gas mixture temperature (direct body-to-body heat transfer) with (2) premature electrostatic charging or tribocharging (direct body-to-body electrical charge transfer) of additive prior to atomization and condensation phenomenon. As such, the single-piece air-CO2-additive mixing nozzle schemes used in the prior art have a significant conflict with regards to the locality of the electrostatic charging, additive injection, and mixing stages of CO2 composite spray formation.
Having thus discussed the prior art in detail, it is apparent that there is a need for an improved CO2 composite spray application method and apparatus. The following discussion describes aspects of a novel CO2 composite spray applicator and method for coaxially injecting, atomizing, electrostatically charging, and dispersing virtually any flowable air-additive composition which resolves the aforementioned constraints. The present aspect provides an apparatus for producing an electrostatically charged and homogeneous CO2 composite spray containing an additive.
In a first aspect of the present invention, CO2 composite spray nozzles are employed as an axis-symmetrically arranged cathode array within which is located an additive injection nozzle behaving as an anode to create a strong ionizing electrostatic field between them in air during spray operation. The CO2 composite spray nozzle and CO2 particles are highly charged due to the presence of excess of electrons relative to its surroundings. The additive spray nozzle and atomized particles are oppositely charged with respect to the CO2 composite spray. The inventors have measured the electrostatic field generated in the air surrounding a CO2 composite spray mixing nozzle using an Exair Static Meter, Model 7905, available from Exair Corporation, Cincinnati, Ohio. A preferred CO2 composite spray system for use with the present invention and co-developed by the first named inventor is U.S. Pat. No. 9,221,067 and is incorporated into this specification by reference to same. As depicted in '067 (
In another aspect, a cluster nozzle arrangement induces significant and parallel air flow symmetrically about the circumference of the CO2 composite spray flow field due to the symmetry, multiplicity, and high velocity of the surrounding CO2 composite sprays. A large inducement of air flow reduces atmospheric drag and extends the effective treatment range (i.e., spray trajectory) of the CO2 composite spray.
In still another aspect of the present invention, the inner additive injection nozzle may use the same source of pressure and temperature regulated propellant gas as the CO2 spray nozzles but uses a separate coaxial additive feed capillary from a remote additive supply. The mixing nozzle for the additive injector is designed to produce an atomized additive spray having velocity which is less (i.e., higher pressure) than the outer CO2 spray nozzle array. This enhances incorporation of the atomized (and passively charged) additive particles into the axis-symmetrically arranged CO2 composite sprays. These and other aspects of the present invention will be best understood by reference to
Having described the general features and arrangement of the passive electrostatic CO2 spray applicator, following is a more detailed description of the CO2 composite spray nozzles (134) and additive injection spray nozzle (136). Referring to the exemplary CO2 composite spray nozzle (134), the coaxial CO2 spray nozzle comprises two components: (1) an outer propellant gas conduit (142) for flowing pressure- and temperature-controlled propellant gas (144), and (2) an inner polymeric CO2 particle conduit (146) for flowing micronized CO2 particles (148). The preferred construction and arrangement of the coaxial CO2 composite spray nozzle (134) is described in detail in U.S. Pat. Nos. 9,221,067 and 7,451,941, both of which are incorporated into the present invention by reference to same.
Referring to the exemplary additive injection spray nozzle (136), the coaxial additive spray nozzle comprise three components: (1) an outer propellant gas conduit (150) for flowing pressure- and temperature-controlled propellant gas (144), which for this exemplary applicator is the same source as for the CO2 composite spray nozzle (134), (2) an inner polymeric additive conduit (152) for flowing a pressure- and temperature-regulated additive (154), and (3) an optional metallic grounding wire (130) which traverses the length of the additive injection tube (
In a first step (290) of the pretreat-clean process, the cluster spray applicator is positioned to distance from the substrate to be treated of between 6 and 18 inches, whereupon an exemplary eco-friendly, human-safe, and high boiling pretreat additive composition comprising 90% (v:v) volatile methyl siloxane (VMS) and 10% (v:v) 1-hexanol is applied (292) to the contaminated surface to form a uniform and thin film which penetrates and denatures (or detackifies) the complex surface contaminant. Exemplary cluster spray parameter ranges for the pretreatment step comprise the following:
This pretreat coating process step is accomplished by positioning the CO2 composite spray applicator of the present invention away from the contaminated surface to a distance where the CO2 particle spray is useful for forming and delivering a passive electrostatic composite spray pretreatment coating, but not useful for imposing a surface impingement or cleaning effect so as not to remove the deposited coating. For example, at a distance of about 6 inches (15 cm) or more, the cluster spray applicator of the present invention is very useful for pre-coating a surface because most of the CO2 particles have sublimated by this point or lack the size and velocity needed to produce an appreciable cleaning (removal) effect. Moreover, CO2 injection pressure (i.e., CO2 particle density), propellant pressure, and propellant temperature may be decreased as needed to facilitate the formation and maintenance of a uniform pretreatment coating.
Following the surface pre-coating step (292), and optionally following a dwell period (294) of between 3 and 600 seconds or more for the surface pretreatment agent to fully penetrate and denature the surface contaminant layer, pretreatment additive injection is stopped and the CO2 composite spray applicator of the present invention is repositioned (296) towards the substrate to a distance of between 1 to 6 inches and a spray applicator angle of between 45 and 90 degrees normal to the surface to provide a precision spray cleaning step (300) to remove the residual pretreatment agent and denatured surface contaminant. Exemplary cluster spray parameter ranges for the spray cleaning step comprise the following:
Finally, this novel pretreat-clean process may be performed manually using a handheld spray applicator or automatically using a robot and end-of-arm spray applicator.
Suitable additives for use in the present invention include, for example, pure liquids and blends of same derived from hydrocarbons, alcohols, siloxanes, terpenes, and esters. In addition solid particles such as graphitic nanoparticles and paint pigments may be blended with suitable carrier solvents to form pressure-flowable or pumpable liquid suspensions. Still moreover, ozonated mixtures of liquids and suspensions may be used in the present invention. Finally, additives such as ionized gases may be used in the present invention.
The present invention is useful for surface decontamination, surface coating, and precision machining applications to provide a coating, cleaning, disinfection, cooling, pretreatment, preservation, painting, and/or lubricating function.
As required, detailed embodiments of the present invention are disclosed herein; however, it is to be understood that the disclosed embodiments are merely exemplary of the invention, which can be embodied in various forms. Therefore, specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting, but merely as a basis for the claims and as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art to variously employ the present invention in virtually any appropriately detailed structure. Further, the title, headings, terms and phrases used herein are not intended to limit the subject matter or scope; but rather, to provide an understandable description of the invention. The invention is composed of several sub-parts that serve a portion of the total functionality of the invention independently and contribute to system level functionality when combined with other parts of the invention. The terms “CO2” and “CO2” and carbon dioxide are interchangeable. The terms “a” or “an”, as used herein, are defined as one or more than one. The term plurality, as used herein, is defined as two or more than two. The term another, as used herein, is defined as at least a second or more. The terms including and/or having, as used herein, are defined as comprising (i.e., open language). The term coupled, as used herein, is defined as connected, although not necessarily directly, and not necessarily mechanically. Any element in a claim that does not explicitly state “means for” performing a specific function, or “step for” performing a specific function, is not be interpreted as a “means” or “step” clause as specified in 35 U.S.C. Sec. 112, Parag. 6. In particular, the use of “step of” in the claims herein is not intended to invoke the provisions of 35 U.S.C. Sec. 112, Parag. 6.
Incorporation of Reference: All research papers, publications, patents, and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication, patent, or patent appl. was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/481,575, filed on Apr. 4, 2017, which is incorporated by reference in entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2052869 | Coanda | Sep 1936 | A |
2302289 | Bramston-Cook | Nov 1942 | A |
2894691 | Sedlacsik | Jul 1959 | A |
3047208 | Coanda | Jul 1962 | A |
3117726 | Schoberg | Jan 1964 | A |
3628737 | Norton | Dec 1971 | A |
3648401 | Stains | Mar 1972 | A |
3670606 | Blomgren | Jun 1972 | A |
3672181 | Tyree | Jun 1972 | A |
3702519 | Rice | Nov 1972 | A |
3708993 | Hardt | Jan 1973 | A |
3734412 | Haas | May 1973 | A |
3743186 | Mocarski | Jul 1973 | A |
3747284 | Lyzeko | Jul 1973 | A |
3795367 | Mocarski | Mar 1974 | A |
3801020 | Mocarski | Apr 1974 | A |
3806039 | Mocarski | Apr 1974 | A |
3862391 | Blomgren | Jan 1975 | A |
3917114 | Grosse | Nov 1975 | A |
3984054 | Frochaux | Oct 1976 | A |
3985302 | Frochaux | Oct 1976 | A |
3990332 | Flom | Nov 1976 | A |
4022119 | Karr | May 1977 | A |
4038786 | Fong | Aug 1977 | A |
4046492 | Inglis | Sep 1977 | A |
4073966 | Scholes | Feb 1978 | A |
4195780 | Inglis | Apr 1980 | A |
4336017 | Desty | Jun 1982 | A |
4341347 | DeVittorio | Jul 1982 | A |
4385728 | Inglis | May 1983 | A |
4389820 | Fong | Jun 1983 | A |
4555059 | Collins | Nov 1985 | A |
4703590 | Westergaard | Nov 1987 | A |
4707951 | Gibot | Nov 1987 | A |
4749125 | Escallon | Jun 1988 | A |
4776515 | Michalchik | Oct 1988 | A |
4801086 | Noakes | Jan 1989 | A |
4806171 | Whitlock | Feb 1989 | A |
4829859 | Yankoff | May 1989 | A |
5002156 | Gaunt | Mar 1991 | A |
5056720 | Crum | Oct 1991 | A |
5124132 | Francis | Jun 1992 | A |
5125979 | Swain | Jun 1992 | A |
5170942 | Spink | Dec 1992 | A |
5222332 | Mains | Jun 1993 | A |
5231851 | Adolfsson | Aug 1993 | A |
5312598 | Kersey | May 1994 | A |
5315793 | Peterson | May 1994 | A |
5333640 | Swift | Aug 1994 | A |
5402940 | Haller | Apr 1995 | A |
5409418 | Krone-Schmidt | Apr 1995 | A |
5444634 | Goldman | Aug 1995 | A |
5509335 | Emerson | Apr 1996 | A |
5591412 | Jones | Jan 1997 | A |
5592863 | Jaskowiak | Jan 1997 | A |
5611491 | Bowers | Mar 1997 | A |
5704554 | Cooper | Jan 1998 | A |
5725154 | Jackson | Mar 1998 | A |
5765761 | Law | Jun 1998 | A |
5853128 | Bowen | Dec 1998 | A |
5901623 | Hong | May 1999 | A |
5918817 | Kanno | Jul 1999 | A |
6039269 | Mandzukic | Mar 2000 | A |
6056213 | Ruta | May 2000 | A |
6105886 | Hollstein | Aug 2000 | A |
6125787 | Mochizuki | Oct 2000 | A |
6206764 | Hsu | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6564682 | Zurecki | May 2003 | B1 |
6656017 | Jackson | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6708903 | Kanno | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6802961 | Jackson | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6979362 | Jackson | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7097717 | Jung | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7134946 | Jackson | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7198043 | Zhang | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7219677 | Jackson | May 2007 | B1 |
7225819 | Jackson | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7293570 | Jackson | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7387477 | Usuki | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7389941 | Jackson | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7451941 | Jackson | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7601112 | Jackson | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7901540 | Jackson | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8021489 | Jackson | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8048830 | Jackson | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8197603 | Jackson | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8801504 | Bowers | Aug 2014 | B2 |
9221067 | Jackson | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9227215 | Jackson | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9352355 | Jackson | May 2016 | B1 |
9387511 | Jackson | Jul 2016 | B1 |
20020020691 | Jewett | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20030207655 | Jackson | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040003828 | Jackson | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040251327 | Messerly | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060027679 | Gratteau | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060071091 | Ratnik | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060278254 | Jackson | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070164130 | Jackson | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070246064 | Jackson | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20090136086 | Farina | May 2009 | A1 |
20110233456 | Jackson | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20180280998 | Jackson | Oct 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2579294 | Apr 2006 | CA |
19903243 | Aug 2000 | DE |
WO0174538 | Oct 2001 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Vicray, R., et. al.; “Thermally Stable Lubricants from Vegetable Oils.” Global Plastics Environmental Conference 2004:151-155; see website: http://sperecycling.org/sites/sperecycling.org/files/gpec/GPEC2004/papers/020.pdf. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/481,575, filed Apr. 4, 2017 for “Passive Electrostatic CO2 Composite Spray Applicator”; Jackson, et. al. |
PCT/US2018/26143, filed on Apr. 4, 2018 for “Passive Electrostatic CO2 Composite Spray Applicator”; Jackson, et. al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/266,539, (filed Dec. 11, 2015) for Adaptive R744 Min. Quantity Cooling Lubrication System; Jackson, et. al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/301,441, (filed Dec. 13, 2005) for “Device for applying cryogenic composition and method of using same.” Jackson, D. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/301,466, (filed Dec. 13, 2005) for “Cryogenic fluid composition.” Jackson, D. |
PCT/US2005/045122; Jackson, D. “Device for applying cryogenic composition and method of using same.” filed Dec. 13, 2005. |
PCT/US2005/044863; Jackson, D., “Carbon dioxide snow apparatus.” filed Dec. 13, 2005. |
PCT/US2005/045180; Jackson, D. “Cryogenic fluid composition.” filed Dec. 13, 2005. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/766,762, (filed Jun. 21, 2007) for Method of Treatment a Substrate; first inventor: Jackson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/425,087, (filed Jun. 19,2006) for Method for Selectively Treating a Substrate Surface; first Inventor: Jackson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/362,598, (filed Jun. 13, 2003) for Surface Cleaning and Modification Processes, Methods and Apparatus Using Physicochemically; first inventor: Jackson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/393,872 (Mar. 21, 2003) for Precision Surface Treatment Using Dense Fluids and a Plasma; first inventor: Jackson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/733,880 (Jan. 3, 2013); 61/583,186 (Jan. 5, 2012) for Method for forming and applying an oxgenated machining fluid; first inventor: Jackson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/843,730, (filed Jul. 8, 2013) for Method for Treating a Substrate Surface using Ozonated Solvent and Ultraviolet Light; first inventor: Jackson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/843,751, (filed Jul. 8, 2013) for Method and Apparatus for Cutting and Cleaning a Superhard Substrate; first inventor: Jackson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/583,186, (filed Jan. 5, 2012) for Method for Forming and Applying an Oxygenated Machining Fluid; first inventor: Jackson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/583,190, (filed Jan. 5, 2012) for Method and Apparatus for Cutting and Cleaning a Superhard Substrate; first inventor: Jackson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/362,598, (filed Jun. 13, 2003) for Surface Cleaning and Modification Processes . . . ; first inventor: Jackson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/465,762, (filed Aug. 18, 2006) for Dense Fluid Delivery Apparatus; first inventor: Jackson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/271,725, (filed Nov. 9, 2005) for Dense Fluid Cleaning . . . ; first inventor: Jackson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/423,603, (filed Mar. 19, 2012); 61/454,026, (filed Mar. 18, 2011) for Method and Apparatus for Thermal Control within a Machining Process; first inventor: Jackson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/465,775, (filed Aug. 18, 2006) for Method and apparatus for treating a substrate with Dense Fluid and Plasma; first inventor: Jackson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/433,833, (filed Jun. 9, 2003) for Apparatus, Process and Method for Mounting and Treating a Substrate; first inventor: Jackson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/343,734, (filed Jan. 1, 2003) for Method and Apparatus for Supercritical Ozone treatment of a substrate; first inventor: Jackson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/635,399, (filed Dec. 13, 2004) for Method, process, chemistry and apparatus for selective thermal control, lubrication and post-cleaning a substrate; first inventor: Jackson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/635,230, (filed Dec. 13, 2004) for Method and app. for selectively treating a substrate using cryogenic sprays; first inventor: Jackson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/221,593, (filed Sep. 12, 2002) for dense fluid spray cleaning process and apparatus; first inventor: Jackson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 08/516,530, (filed Aug. 18, 1995) for dense fluid spray cleaning process and apparatus; first inventor: Jackson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/221,767, (filed Mar. 13, 2001) for dense fluid cleaning centrifugal phase shirting separation process and apparatus; first inventor: Jackson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/476,108, (filed Oct. 24, 2003) for apparatus and process for the treatment, delivery and recycle of process fluids . . . ; first inventor: Jackson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/016,836, (filed Jan. 28, 2011) for substrate treatment process; first inventor: Jackson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/428,793, (filed May 2, 2003) for Method and Apparatus for Selective Treatment of a Precision Substrate Surface; first inventor: Jackson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/393,872, (filed Mar. 21, 2003) for Precision Surface Treats Using Dense Fluids and a Plasma; first inventor: Jackson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/863,311, filed Apr. 14, 2013 for Particle-Plasma Ablation Process; inventors: Jackson and Endres. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/820,524, (filed May 7, 2013) for Photomechanical Machining Method for a Dielectric Cutting System; first inventor: Jackson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/836,636 for Det. of Composition and Structure of a CO2 Composite Spray; first inventor: Jackson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/836,635 for CO2 Composite Spray Method and Apparatus; first inventor: Jackson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/624,322, (filed Apr. 15, 2012); U.S. Appl. No. 13/863,311, (filed Apr. 15, 2013) for Particle-Plasma Abelation Process; Inventors: Jackson and Endres. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/863,318, (filed Apr. 15, 2013) for Particle-Plasma Abelation Process; Inventors: Jackson and Endres. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/307,488, (filed Jun. 17, 2014); U.S. Appl. No. 61/836,635, (filed Jun. 18, 2013); U.S. Appl. No. 61/836,636, (filed Jun. 18, 2013) for CO2 Composite Spray Method and Apparatus; Inventors: Jackson, et. al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/308,697, (filed Jun. 18, 2014); U.S. Appl. No. 61/836,635, (filed Jun. 18, 2013); U.S. Appl. No. 61/836,636, (filed Jun. 18, 2013) for Det. of Composition and Structure of CO2 Composite Spray; Inventors: Jackson, et. al. |
PCT/US2014/043046, filed on Jun. 18, 2014 for Method and Apparatus for Forming and Regulating a CO2 Composite Spray; Inventor Jackson, et. al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/325,278, (filed Jul. 7, 2014) for Method for Treating a Substrate Surface Using Ozonated Solvent and Ultraviolet Light; Inventor: Jackson; U.S. Appl. No. 61/843,730, filed Jul. 8, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/335,875, (filed Jul. 18, 2014) for Method and Appraatus for Cutting and Cleaning a Superhard Substrate; Inventor: Jackson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/217,040 for Adaptive R744 Min. Quantity Cooling Lubrication System, on Dec. 11, 2018; claims benefit of U.S. Appl. No. 62/597,526, filed Dec. 12, 2017. |
PCT/US2018/065053, filed on Dec. 11, 2018; first listed inventor: Jackson. |
Aronson, R.,“Using High-Pressure Fluids”, Manufacturing Engineering, Jun. 2004, vol. 132, No. 6; http://www.sme.org/MEMagazine/Article.aspx?id=37402&taxid=1416. |
Kubie, L., “The Solubility of O2, CO2, and N2 in Mineral Oil and the Transfer of Carbon Dioxide from Oil to Air,” Jan. 1927. |
Hobbie, M., “Disintegration of Liquid Phases in Pressurized Gases—Influence of Mass Transfer”, ILASS Europe 2002, Zaragoza 9, Sep. 11, 2002. |
Rainey, K.N.,“Effect of Pressure, Subcooling, and Dissolved Gas on Pool Boiling Heat Transfer From Microporous Surfaces in FC-72”, Int'l Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Jan. 2003, vol. 46(1): 23-35. |
Schey, J., Tribology in Metalworking—Friction, Lubrication and Wear, American Society for Metals, 1983, pp. 624-625. |
Veillette, M., Abstract for “Six Month Tracking of Microbial Growth in a Metalworking Fluid after System Cleaning and Recharging”, M. Veillette et al., Am. Occup. Hyg., vol. 48, No. 6, pp. 541-546, 2004. |
“U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Kinetics of Microbial Inactivation for Alternative Food Processing Technologies—High Pressure Processing”, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Jun. 2, 2000. |
Hendershot, R., “Use of Oxygen to Improve Combustion and Oxidation”, Hendershot, R et al, Chemical Engineering Progress, Jul. 2010. |
Fox, G., Self-Organization During Friction—Advanced Surface-Engineered Materials and Systems Design, German S. Fox-Rabinovich et al, CRC Taylor and Francis Group, 2007. |
Buckley, D., “The Role of the Micro Environment on the Tribological Behavior of Materials”, Buckley, D., NASA Technical Memorandum 81434, NASA-TM-81434, NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio, 1980. |
Rakovsky, S., “Fields of Ozone Applications”, Rakovsky, S et al, Chemistry and Chemical Technology, vol. 3, No. 2, 2009. |
Nguyen, T., “An Assessment of the Applicability of Cold Air and Oil Mist in Surface Grinding”, Nguyen, T. et al, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 140 (2003), pp. 224-230. |
Han, R., Abstract for “Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Ozone in Green Cutting”, Han R. et al, Key Engineering Materials, vols. 431-432 2010) pp. 217-220. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180280998 A1 | Oct 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62481575 | Apr 2017 | US |