Information
-
Patent Grant
-
6526752
-
Patent Number
6,526,752
-
Date Filed
Wednesday, January 31, 200123 years ago
-
Date Issued
Tuesday, March 4, 200321 years ago
-
Inventors
-
Original Assignees
-
Examiners
- Denion; Thomas
- Trieu; Thai-B
Agents
-
CPC
-
US Classifications
Field of Search
US
- 060 6052
- 060 324
- 138 44
- 137 160
- 137 468
- 123 56811
-
International Classifications
-
Abstract
A passive engine exhaust flow restriction arrangement includes a fixed geometry flow restriction mechanism disposed in line with an exhaust conduit. In one embodiment, the flow restriction mechanism is disposed upstream of a turbocharger turbine, and in an alternate embodiment it is disposed downstream of the turbine. In either case, the flow restriction mechanism defines a fixed cross sectional flow area therethrough that is less than the cross sectional flow area of the exhaust conduit. Preferably, the cross sectional flow area of the flow restriction mechanism is sized to optimize one, or both, of turbine efficiency and engine fuel economy.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to mechanisms for optimizing the operational efficiency of a turbocharger for an internal combustion engine, and more specifically to mechanisms for restricting engine exhaust flow supplied to and/or by a turbocharger turbine.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) systems for internal combustion engines are known and are generally operable to selectively direct exhaust gas produced by the engine back into the fresh charge supplied to the air intake system for the purpose of controlling NO
x
emissions. In order to establish a positive flow of exhaust gas into the fresh air stream, the exhaust gas pressure must necessarily be greater than the intake air pressure. This requirement may be compromised in air handling systems including a turbocharger, and conventional turbocharger/EGR control systems accordingly include one or more mechanisms for managing turbocharger swallowing capacity in order to provide adequate back pressure to ensure positive EGR flow.
One known technique for ensuring positive EGR flow requires sizing the dimensions of the turbocharger turbine to provide a fixed geometry that is small enough to ensure positive EGR flow under all expected engine operating conditions. Alternatively, the turbocharger turbine may be configured to have a variable geometry, wherein the swallowing capacity of the turbine may be controlled by controlling the air flow geometry thereof. Alternatively still, the air handling system may include a wastegate operable to selectively direct exhaust gas around the turbocharger turbine in order to modulate the exhaust gas pressure.
While the foregoing techniques for ensuring positive EGR flow are generally operable to accomplish their particular goals, they have certain drawbacks associated therewith. For example, reducing the swallowing capacity of the turbocharger also has the undesirable effect of increasing the intake manifold pressure. If the turbine efficiency is higher than desired, the net result will be higher than desired turbocharger rotor speed, turbocharger outlet pressure, cylinder pressure and engine heat rejection. Moreover, fuel economy will suffer and soot loading of the oil will be worsened.
If the “apparent” turbine efficiency can be managed without changing its physical air swallowing capacity, several operational advantages can be realized. For example, the EGR rate can then be increased so that injection timing can be advanced and fuel consumption thereby improved. Boost pressure can also be lowered, thereby increasing available engine power. Moreover, a larger geometry turbine can be used to allow for improvement in high speed power and fuel economy.
One known mechanism for managing apparent turbine efficiency is a variable flow rate exhaust throttle that typically includes a valve or similar mechanism that may be selectively controlled to correspondingly reduce or enlarge the effective flow area of the exhaust conduit. However, while such devices are generally operable to achieve their designed function, they are typically unreliable in operation. Moreover, such variable flow rate exhaust throttles undesirably add weight and significant cost to the air handling system. What is therefore needed is a simple, reliable and inexpensive mechanism for optimizing the apparent turbine efficiency to thereby improve engine output power and controllability.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The foregoing shortcomings of the prior art are addressed by the present invention. In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, a passive engine exhaust flow restriction arrangement comprises a turbocharger having a turbocharger turbine defining a turbine inlet operable to receive exhaust gas produced by an internal combustion engine and a turbine outlet operable to expel engine exhaust gas therefrom, a first engine exhaust conduit in fluid communication with the turbine inlet and defining a first cross sectional flow area therethrough, a second engine exhaust conduit in fluid communication with the turbine outlet and defining a second cross sectional flow area therethrough, and a passive flow restriction member disposed in line with either of the first and second engine exhaust conduits and defining a third fixed cross sectional flow area therethrough less than either of the first and second cross sectional flow areas.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, A passive engine exhaust flow restriction arrangement comprises a turbocharger having a turbocharger turbine defining a turbine inlet operable to receive exhaust gas produced by an internal combustion engine and a turbine outlet operable to expel engine exhaust gas therefrom, an exhaust conduit disposed in fluid communication an exhaust manifold of the engine and the turbine inlet, the exhaust conduit defining a first cross sectional flow area therethrough, and a passive flow restriction member disposed in line with the exhaust conduit and defining a second fixed cross sectional flow area therethrough less than the first cross sectional flow area.
In accordance with yet another aspect of the present invention, a passive engine exhaust flow restriction arrangement comprises a turbocharger having a turbocharger turbine defining a turbine inlet operable to receive exhaust gas produced by an internal combustion engine and a turbine outlet operable to expel engine exhaust gas therefrom, an exhaust conduit disposed in fluid communication between the turbine outlet and ambient, the exhaust conduit defining a first cross sectional flow area therethrough, and a passive flow restriction member disposed in line with the exhaust conduit and defining a second fixed cross sectional flow area therethrough less than the first cross sectional flow area.
One object of the present invention is to provide a passive engine exhaust flow restriction arrangement defining a fixed cross sectional flow area therethrough.
Another object of the present invention is to size such an exhaust flow restriction arrangement to optimize turbocharger turbine efficiency.
Yet another object of the present invention is to size such an exhaust flow restriction arrangement to optimize engine fuel economy.
These and other objects of the present invention will become more apparent from the following description of the preferred embodiment.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1
is a diagrammatic illustration of one preferred embodiment of an air handling system for an internal combustion engine including a passive exhaust flow restriction arrangement, in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 2
is a diagrammatic illustration of one preferred embodiment of a passive engine exhaust flow restriction arrangement, in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 3
is a cross-sectional diagram of an alternate embodiment of a passive engine exhaust flow restriction arrangement viewed along section lines
3
—
3
of
FIG. 1
, in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 4
is a plot of turbine efficiency vs. exhaust flow comparing turbine efficiencies resulting from a number of passive engine exhaust flow restriction mechanisms each defining different effective flow areas.
FIG. 5
is a plot of engine fuel consumption vs. exhaust restriction flow area illustrating the effect on fuel economy of different exhaust restriction flow areas.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles of the invention, reference will now be made to a number of preferred embodiments illustrated in the drawings and specific language will be used to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the invention is thereby intended, such alterations and further modifications in the illustrated embodiments, and such further applications of the principles of the invention as illustrated therein being contemplated as would normally occur to one skilled in the art to which the invention relates.
Referring now to
FIG. 1
, one preferred embodiment of an air handling system
10
for an internal combustion engine including a passive exhaust flow restriction arrangement, in accordance with the present invention, is shown. System
10
includes an internal combustion engine
12
having an intake manifold
14
fluidly coupled to an outlet of a compressor
16
of a turbocharger
18
via an intake conduit
20
, wherein the compressor
16
includes a compressor inlet coupled to an intake conduit
24
for receiving fresh air therefrom. Optionally, as shown in phantom in
FIG. 1
, system
10
may include an intake air cooler
22
of known construction disposed in line with intake conduit
20
between the turbocharger compressor
16
and the intake manifold
14
. The turbocharger compressor
16
is mechanically coupled to a turbocharger turbine
26
via a drive shaft
28
, wherein turbine
26
includes a turbine inlet fluidly coupled to an exhaust manifold
30
of engine
12
via an exhaust conduit
32
, and further includes a turbine outlet fluidly coupled to ambient via an exhaust conduit
34
. An EGR valve
38
is disposed in line with an EGR conduit
36
disposed in fluid communication with the intake conduit
20
and the exhaust conduit
32
, and an EGR cooler
40
of known construction may optionally be disposed in line with EGR conduit
36
between EGR valve
38
and intake conduit
20
as shown in phantom in FIG.
1
.
System
10
includes an engine controller
42
that is preferably microprocessor-based and is generally operable to control and manage the overall operation of engine
12
. Engine controller
42
is responsive, at least in part, to a number of sensor input signals to produce an EGR control signal at an EGR output thereof. The EGR output of engine controller
42
is electrically connected to EGR valve
38
via signal path
44
, and controller
42
is operable, as is known in the art, to thereby control the flow of exhaust gas between conduit
32
and conduit
20
. Engine controller
42
is further responsive to one or more of the sensor input signals to produce a variable geometry turbocharger control signal at a VGT output thereof. The VGT output of engine controller
42
is electrically connected to a turbine control mechanism via signal path
46
, wherein the turbine control mechanism may be an electronically controllable variable geometry turbocharger and/or an electronically controllable wastegate. In this case, controller
42
is operable, as is known in the art, to control such a turbine control mechanism via the VGT output. Alternatively, the turbine control mechanism may be a mechanically, pneumatically and/or hydraulically actuatable wastegate or variable geometry turbocharger, in which case control thereof may or may not be assisted by controller
42
.
In accordance with one preferred embodiment of the present invention, exhaust conduit
34
includes a passive flow restriction mechanism (PFRM)
50
disposed in line therewith. In this embodiment, exhaust conduit
34
defines a first cross sectional flow area therethrough and flow restriction mechanism
50
defines a second, reduced cross sectional flow therethrough. In an alternative embodiment of the present invention, the passive flow restriction mechanism (PFRM)
50
may be disposed in line with exhaust conduit
32
, wherein exhaust conduit defines a third cross sectional flow area therethrough that is greater than the second cross sectional flow area defined by the flow restriction mechanism
50
. It is to be understood that the first cross sectional flow area defined by exhaust conduit
34
may or may not be the same as the third cross sectional flow area defined by exhaust conduit
32
, but in any case both are larger in cross sectional flow area than that defined by the flow restriction mechanism
50
.
Referring now to
FIG. 2
, one preferred embodiment
50
′ of either flow restriction mechanism
50
of
FIG. 1
, in accordance with the present invention, is shown. In this embodiment, flow restriction
50
′ preferably comprises a section of exhaust conduit
32
or
34
that is reduced in cross sectional flow area and thus defines a venturi
52
. Referring to
FIG. 3
, an alternate embodiment
50
″ of either flow restriction mechanism
50
of
FIG. 1
, in accordance with the present invention. In this embodiment, the flow restriction mechanism
50
″ preferably comprises a plate or shield
54
disposed within exhaust conduit
32
or
34
and defining an orifice
56
therethrough. In this embodiment, the exhaust conduit
32
or
34
is shown as having a circular cross section defining a diameter D
1
, and orifice
56
is shown as having a circular cross section defining a diameter D
2
, wherein D
2
<D
1
. It is to be understood, however, that the cross sectional flow areas of either one or both of the exhaust conduit
32
(or
34
) and orifice
56
may alternatively have a non-circular cross section.
Referring now to
FIG. 4
, a plot of turbine efficiency vs. exhaust flow through an exhaust conduit such as conduit
32
or
34
, is shown for a number of different cross sectional flow areas therethrough. For example, curve
62
corresponds to the case where the flow through conduit
32
or
34
is unrestricted (i.e., without flow restriction mechanism
50
), curve
64
corresponds to a flow restriction mechanism defining a 3.0 in
2
cross sectional flow area therethrough and curve
66
corresponds to a flow restriction mechanism defining a 2.5 in
2
cross sectional flow area therethrough. Also superimposed onto the plot are a number of optimal turbine efficiency/flow parameter operating points
60
for various combinations of engine speed and altitude. Inspection of the plot of
FIG. 4
reveals that the optimum turbine efficiency/flow parameter operating points tend to be closely grouped about curve
66
, thereby indicating that turbine efficiency can be roughly optimized for the air handling system represented by the plot of
FIG. 4
by implementing a flow restriction device
50
defining a cross sectional flow area therethrough of approximately 2.5 in
2
. Naturally, optimum turbine efficiency is a dynamic variable and can therefore be more accurately controlled with a variable geometry flow restriction device, but only at the expense of more weight, higher cost and much lower reliability than the passive, fixed orifice flow restriction mechanism
50
of the present invention. Although not as accurate as a variable geometry flow restriction device, the flow restriction mechanism
50
of the present invention can be sized to allow the “apparent” turbine efficiency to be much closer to its optimum value without the cost, weight and reliability concerns associated with the variable geometry device.
Referring now to
FIG. 5
, a plot of fuel consumption vs. exhaust restriction flow area through an exhaust conduit such as conduit
32
or
34
, is shown for a number of different engine speed/throttle combinations. For example, curve
70
corresponds to 2100 RPM at full throttle, curve
72
corresponds to 1600 RPM at full throttle and curve
74
corresponds to 1800 RPM at full throttle. Other engine speed/throttle combinations are shown, but the consistent behavior for each engine speed throttle combination indicates that there exists a flow restriction cross sectional area that roughly optimizes fuel consumption for all engine speed/throttle combinations. As with turbine efficiency, however, optimum fuel consumption is a dynamic variable and can therefore be more accurately controlled with a variable geometry flow restriction device. However, the fixed geometry flow restriction mechanism
50
of the present invention realizes most of the same improvement as a variable geometry flow restriction device without the cost, weight and reliability concerns associated with variable geometry devices.
Preferably, the size of the cross sectional flow area defined by the flow restriction mechanism
50
of the present invention is chosen based on optimization considerations of both turbine efficiency and fuel consumption, and will often involve a tradeoff between the two. Alternatively, the size of the cross sectional flow area defined by the flow restriction mechanism
50
of the present invention may be chosen to optimize only one or the other of turbine efficiency and fuel consumption.
While the invention has been illustrated and described in detail in the foregoing drawings and description, the same is to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive in character, it being understood that only preferred embodiments thereof have been shown and described and that all changes and modifications that come within the spirit of the invention are desired to be protected.
Claims
- 1. A passive engine exhaust flow restriction arrangement, comprising:a turbocharger having a turbine defining a turbine inlet operable to receive exhaust gas produced by an internal combustion engine and a turbine outlet operable to expel engine exhaust gas therefrom; a first engine exhaust conduit in fluid communication with said turbine inlet and defining a third cross sectional flow area therethrough; an EGR conduit fluidly coupled between said first engine exhaust conduit and an intake manifold of said engine, said EGR conduit supplying recirculated exhaust gas to said intake manifold; a second engine exhaust conduit in fluid communication with said turbine outlet and defining a first cross sectional flow area therethrough; and a passive flow restriction member disposed in line with either of said first and second engine exhaust conduits downstream of said EGR conduit and defining a second fixed cross sectional flow area therethrough less than either of said first and third cross sectional flow areas, said second cross sectional flow area sized to reduce an operational efficiency of said turbine to thereby allow increased flow of said recirculated exhaust gas through said EGR conduit.
- 2. The exhaust flow restriction arrangement of claim 1 wherein said passive flow restriction member is disposed in line with said first engine exhaust conduit;and wherein said passive flow restriction member comprises a section of said first engine exhaust conduit defining said second cross sectional flow area therethrough.
- 3. The exhaust flow restriction arrangement of claim 1 wherein said passive flow restriction member is disposed in line with said second engine exhaust conduit;and wherein said passive flow restriction member comprises a section of said second engine exhaust conduit defining said second cross sectional flow area therethrough.
- 4. The exhaust flow restriction arrangement of claim 1 wherein said passive flow restriction member includes a plate member disposed within either of said first and second engine exhaust conduits, said plate member having an orifice extending therethrough defining said second cross sectional flow area.
- 5. The exhaust flow restriction arrangement of claim 1 wherein said second cross sectional area is sized to further optimize fuel economy associated with said engine.
- 6. A passive engine exhaust flow restriction arrangement, comprising:a turbocharger having a turbine defining a turbine inlet operable to receive exhaust gas produced by an internal combustion engine and a turbine outlet operable to expel engine exhaust gas therefrom; an exhaust conduit disposed in fluid communication between an exhaust manifold of said engine and said turbine inlet, said exhaust conduit defining a third cross sectional flow area therethrough; an EGR conduit fluidly coupled between said exhaust conduit and an intake manifold of said engine, said EGR conduit supplying recirculated exhaust gas to said intake manifold; and a passive flow restriction member disposed in line with said exhaust conduit downstream of said EGR conduit and defining a second fixed cross sectional flow area therethrough less than said third cross sectional flow area, said second cross sectional flow area sized to reduce an operational efficiency of said turbine to thereby allow increased flow of said recirculated exhaust gas through said EGR conduit.
- 7. The exhaust flow restriction arrangement of claim 6 wherein said passive flow restriction member comprises a section of said exhaust conduit defining said second cross sectional flow area therethrough.
- 8. The exhaust flow restriction arrangement of claim 6 wherein said passive flow restriction member includes a plate member disposed within said exhaust conduit, said plate member having an orifice extending therethrough defining said second cross sectional flow area.
- 9. The exhaust flow restriction arrangement of claim 6 wherein said second cross sectional area is sized to further optimize fuel economy associated with said engine.
- 10. A passive engine exhaust flow restriction arrangement, comprising:a turbocharger having a turbine defining a turbine inlet operable to receive exhaust gas produced by an internal combustion engine and a turbine outlet operable to expel engine exhaust gas therefrom; a first exhaust conduit disposed in fluid communication between said turbine outlet and ambient, said first exhaust conduit defining a first cross sectional flow area therethrough; a second exhaust conduit disposed in fluid communication between an exhaust manifold of said engine and said turbine inlet; an EGR conduit fluidly coupled between said second exhaust conduit and an intake manifold of said engine, said EGR conduit supplying recirculated exhaust gas to said intake manifold; and a passive flow restriction member disposed in line with said first exhaust conduit and defining a second fixed cross sectional flow area therethrough less than said first cross sectional flow area, said second cross sectional flow area sized to reduce an operational efficiency of said turbine to thereby allow increased flow of said recirculated exhaust gas through said EGR conduit.
- 11. The exhaust flow restriction arrangement of claim 10 wherein said passive flow restriction member comprises a section of said exhaust conduit defining said second cross sectional flow area therethrough.
- 12. The exhaust flow restriction arrangement of claim 10 wherein said passive flow restriction member includes a plate member disposed within said exhaust conduit, said plate member having an orifice extending therethrough defining said second cross sectional flow area.
- 13. The exhaust flow restriction arrangement of claim 10 wherein said second cross sectional area is sized to further optimize fuel economy associated with said engine.
US Referenced Citations (11)
Foreign Referenced Citations (10)
Number |
Date |
Country |
946 930 |
Aug 1956 |
DE |
26 20 594 |
Nov 1976 |
DE |
32 18 156 |
Nov 1983 |
DE |
43 19 380 |
Dec 1993 |
DE |
531277 |
Mar 1993 |
EP |
54-148927 |
Nov 1979 |
JP |
05-71428 |
Mar 1993 |
JP |
11125147 |
May 1999 |
JP |
WO 9216725 |
Oct 1992 |
WO |
WO 0146573 |
Jun 2001 |
WO |