The following prior applications are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety for all purposes:
U.S. Pat. No. 9,288,089, filed May 20, 2010 as application Ser. No. 12/784,414 and issued Mar. 15, 2016, naming Harm Cronie and Amin Shokrollahi, entitled “Orthogonal Differential Vector Signaling”, hereinafter identified as [Cronie].
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/842,740, filed Mar. 15, 2013, naming Brian Holden, Amin Shokrollahi, and Anant Singh, entitled “Methods and Systems for Skew Tolerance in and Advanced Detectors for Vector Signaling Codes for Chip-to-Chip Communication”, hereinafter identified as [Holden].
U.S. Pat. No. 9,100,232, filed Feb. 2, 2015 as application Ser. No. 14/612,241, and issued Aug. 4, 2015, naming Ali Hormati, Amin Shokrollahi, and Roger Ulrich, entitled “Method for Code Evaluation using ISI Ratio”, hereinafter identified as [Hormati I].
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/582,545, filed Apr. 28, 2017, naming Ali Hormati and Richard Simpson, entitled “Clock Data Recovery with Decision Feedback Equalization” hereinafter identified as [Hormati II].
In communication systems, a goal is to transport information from one physical location to another. One common information transfer medium is the serial communications link, which may be based on a single wire circuit relative to ground or other common reference, multiple such circuits relative to ground or other common reference, or multiple circuits used in relation to each other. A common example of the latter uses differential signaling (“DS”). Differential signaling operates by sending a signal on one wire and the opposite of that signal on a matching wire. The signal information is represented by the difference between the wires, rather than their absolute values relative to ground or other fixed reference. Vector signaling is another such example. With vector signaling, a plurality of signals on a plurality of wires are considered collectively, although each of the plurality of signals might be independent. With binary vector signaling, each component or “symbol” of the vector takes on one of two possible values. With non-binary vector signaling, each symbol has a value that is a selection from a set of more than two possible values. Any suitable subset of a vector signaling code denotes a “subcode” of that code. Such a subcode may itself be a vector signaling code.
A detection matrix is described for an Orthogonal Differential Vector Signaling code in which passive resistor networks are used to sum at least some of the input terms of that code before active detection of a subchannel result. Such passive summation can reduce the detrimental effects of common mode signal variation and increase the dynamic range of the resulting detector.
Methods and systems are described for receiving a plurality of signals via a plurality of wires of a multi-wire bus, the plurality of signals corresponding to symbols of a codeword of a vector signaling code, generating, using an interconnected resistor network connected to the plurality of wires of the multi-wire bus, a plurality of combinations of the symbols of the codeword of the vector signaling code on a plurality of output nodes, the plurality of output nodes including a plurality of pairs of sub-channel output nodes associated with respective sub-channels of a plurality of sub-channels, and generating a plurality of sub-channel outputs using a plurality of differential transistor pairs, each differential transistor pair of the plurality of differential transistor pairs connected to a respective pair of sub-channel output nodes of the plurality of pairs of sub-channel output nodes.
Orthogonal Differential Vector Signaling codes (ODVS) are described [Cronie] as being particularly suited to use in high-speed multiwire communication systems. In one interpretation, ODVS is described as a word-oriented encoding/decoding method providing improved performance and robustness; data words are encoded into ODVS codewords for transmission essentially in parallel on multiple signal wires, one such codeword per unit interval, with the receiver subsequently detecting those codewords and decoding them so as to recover the data. In an alternative view, each ODVS codeword may be interpreted as a weighted summation of multiple independent (e.g. orthogonal) sub-channel vectors, each sub-channel vector modulated by a corresponding data signal of the overall data word composed of multiple data signals being transmitted.
In some embodiments, an ODVS code is described and defined by a matrix. Each row of the matrix may be interpreted as a sub-channel vector of elements that may be weighted by a corresponding signal element, with each column representing one wire of the multiwire communications channel. An individual wire signal may thus contribute to multiple sub-channels in various combinations with other wire signals.
Without implying limitation, the H4 code of [Cronie], also known as the Ensemble Non-Return-to-Zero or ENRZ code, will be used in the subsequent examples. ENRZ encodes three data bits for transmission over a four-wire channel. Its defining matrix is:
and encoding of the three bits D0, D1, D2 may be obtained by multiplying the data bits by rows 2-4 of the Hadamard matrix H4 to obtain four output values. In such an embodiment, each row of the rows 2-4 of the matrix of Eqn. 1 corresponds to a respective sub-channel vector of a plurality of sub-channel vectors. Each sub-channel vector being modulated, or weighted, by a respective data bit (taking values of +1 or −1) corresponds to a modulated sub-channel. A sum of all of the modulated sub-channels produces a codeword of a vector signaling code. In the word-oriented view, the three-bit data word D<2:0> is multiplied by rows 2-4 of the above matrix to encode the data into a four value codeword composed of values [A, B, C, D]. An offset may be added to each codeword value for ease in transmission along the multi-wire bus medium. Because the first “all-ones” row of the matrix is not used, the resulting codewords of the ENRZ code are balanced, all symbols of a given codeword summing to zero (or a constant when an offset is added), and are either permutations of the vector [+1, −⅓, −⅓, −⅓] or [−1, +⅓, +⅓, +⅓]. Thus, physical wire signals corresponding to a series of ENRZ codewords may take on four distinct values.
In some embodiments, the uppermost vector of the matrix is described as corresponding to common mode signaling, which is not used herein. Thus, each of the sub-channel vectors corresponding to rows 2-4 of the matrix are multiplied (or modulated) by a corresponding data bit of the set of data bits D0, D1, D2 to produce three modulated sub-channels, which are summed together to produce symbols A, B, C, D, of the codeword to transmit over wires of a multi-wire bus.
As described by [Cronie], ODVS may be decoded by multiplication of the received signals by a decoding matrix. In some embodiments, the decoding matrix may correspond to the encoding matrix, or alternatively an inverse of the encoding matrix. As described in [Cronie], “Sylvester Hadamard matrices” are symmetric, which means they are identical to their inverses. [Holden] further teaches that one efficient means of performing this operation uses Multi-Input Comparators (MICs). Each MIC computes a linear combination of weighted input signals where the weights at a given MIC are determined by a corresponding sub-channel vector in the detection matrix, with the output of each MIC corresponding to an antipodal sub-channel output representing the input data at the transmitter. Thus, binary data encoded onto an ENRZ channel will result in an antipodal (i.e. a single “eye” opening) MIC output that may be sampled using conventional binary signal detection methods. A set of MICs that detect the plurality of ENRZ sub-channels may be described by equations 2-4 below:
Sub0=(W1+W3)−(W0+W2) (Eqn. 2)
Sub1=(W0+W3)−(W1+W2) (Eqn. 3)
Sub2=(W2+W3)−(W0+W1) (Eqn. 4)
where wire signals W0, W1, W2, W3 represent individual columns [Holden] further teaches that these equations may be efficiently implemented in analog logic as three instances of a four-input differential amplifier, the described embodiment having multiple transistor inputs producing two inverting and two non-inverting terms of equal weight that are actively summed to the desired result.
MIC embodiments that rely on active input elements may have issues with signal dynamic range and/or common mode rejection. The latter may be a significant problem with ODVS codes such as ENRZ, as modulation of one subchannel can present as a varying common mode offset in other sub-channels.
A passive MIC embodiment is presented which avoids these issues. Rather than using active circuit components to buffer and isolate the input signals before the analog computation, a passive interconnected resistor network performs the combinations of the symbols of the codeword on a plurality of pairs of sub-channel output nodes prior to a conventional differential signal receiver or amplifier. In at least one embodiment, an interconnected resistor network may include three identical instances of a resistor network each being driven by a respective input permutation of input signals to provide differential outputs on a respective pair of sub-channel output nodes that are provided to respective signal receivers/differential amplifiers, which in turn generate three sub-channel outputs.
As a first example of ENRZ detection of subchannel Sub0 with the circuit of
Identical filtering circuits 120 and 121, shown here as being composed of elements Rs and Cs, connected to a termination resistor Rt, provides frequency-dependent filtering and signal termination, in accordance with some embodiments. In one example embodiment, the combination of input series impedance (e.g. R1 paralleled with R3, etc.), Rs, and Cs provide a high frequency peaking effect. while Rt provides a termination impedance for the input signal. Such filtering may be useful for clock and data recovery or CTLE, where rounded (e.g., low-pass filtered) transitions are desirable to use transition samples for generating a phase-error signal used to update a voltage-controlled oscillator (VCO). The CDR disclosed in [Hormati II] utilizing DFE may benefit from such filtering to provided more rounded eyes when utilizing speculative DFE samples as phase error information. In some embodiments, by adjusting the impedances of resistors R1-R4, the cutoff frequency of the low-pass filter may be adjusted, as described in more detail below with respect to
In one embodiment, 131 is a differential linear amplifier performing the subtraction operation of Eqn. 2, thus sub-channel output Sub0 is an analog signal representing a respective data signal provided to the transmitter. In another embodiment, 131 is a differential comparator performing the subtraction operation by generating an analog antipodal value followed by an amplitude slicing operation, resulting in a binary digital sub-channel output corresponding to the binary data value used to modulate the sub-channel. In further embodiments, 131 may additionally incorporate clocked or dynamic sampling elements, capturing the state of the analog or digital result at a desired time.
The circuit of
In some embodiments, the circuit may operate in a third mode, where all of the switches S1, S2, S3, S4 are opened to isolate wires W0, W1, W2, W3 from the loading effects of the subchannel receiver. Such a configuration may be used for example during a transmit (Tx) mode of operation in which other system components drive the wires in the opposite direction. In such an embodiment, every sub-channel receiver may be fully disconnected from the wires of the multi-wire bus. Alternatively, a single sub-channel receiver may be disconnected from the multi-wire bus, while the other two sub-channel receivers operate on respective differential signals, as described above.
Typically, switches S1, S2, S3, S4 are implemented using MOS transistors controlled by digital mode control signals e.g., a,b,c,d as well known in the art. The schematics of
Sub-channel receivers for subchannels Sub1 and Sub2 may be identical to
In some embodiments, as described above, the interconnected resistor network is part of a transceiver that includes multiple drivers for driving symbols onto the wires of the multi-wire bus. In such an embodiment, the drivers and interconnected resistor network may be selectively connected to the multi-wire bus in a Tx mode, or one of the multiple Rx modes described above, e.g., ODVS and differential signaling or “legacy” mode.
In some embodiments, the amount of high frequency peaking provided by circuit 121 may be varied by changing the effective input series impedance of the wire signals. In one particular further embodiment, each of the resistor/switch combinations 110 of
In some embodiments, switching circuit S2 in resistor circuit 110 may be controlled using a single mode control bit a to set an operational mode, as shown in
In other embodiments, digitally controlled resistor and/or capacitor groups used to adjust the frequency characteristics of 120 and 121 may be used either alone or in combination with the previously described embodiment.
In embodiments where the circuit of
Detection of other ODVS codes may be accomplished by adjustment of input resistor values to produce other input weighting ratios as described in [Holden]. In system environments where both true and compliment versions of input signals are available (as one example, from active CTLE stages having differential outputs) both non-inverted and inverted signal values may be resistively summed prior to active detection.
In some embodiments, the plurality of combinations of the symbols of the codeword are generated by adding two or more signals corresponding to the symbols of the codeword. In some embodiments, the plurality of combinations of the symbols of the codeword are generated by forming an average of two or more signals corresponding to the symbols of the codeword.
In some embodiments, each output node of the plurality of output nodes is connected to two or more wires of the plurality of wires of the multi-wire bus via respective resistors of a plurality of resistors, as shown in
In some embodiments, the method further includes selecting an operational mode via a plurality of mode-selection transistors, the plurality of mode-selection transistors selectively coupling/decoupling one or more wires to/from one or more output nodes of the plurality of output nodes. Some such embodiments may include coupling one respective wire of the plurality of wires of the multi-wire bus to a respective output node of the plurality of output nodes. In such embodiments, each sub-channel output of the plurality of sub-channel outputs corresponds to a differential output across two wires of the plurality of wires of the multi-wire bus, as previously described in the “legacy” mode of operation.
In some embodiments, the plurality sub-channels correspond to a plurality of sub-channel vectors modulated by respective input data signals of a plurality of input data signals. In some such embodiments, the plurality of sub-channel vectors correspond to mutually orthogonal rows of an orthogonal matrix.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/435,412, filed Jun. 7, 2019, entitled “Passive Multi-Input Comparator for Orthogonal Codes on a Multi-Wire Bus,” which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/684,538, filed Jun. 13, 2018, entitled “Passive Multi-Input Comparator for Orthogonal Codes on a Multi-Wire Bus”, and claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/683,955, filed Jun. 12, 2018, entitled “Passive Multi-Input Comparator for Orthogonal Codes on a Multi-Wire Bus”, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3636463 | Ongkiehong | Jan 1972 | A |
3824494 | Wilcox | Jul 1974 | A |
3939468 | Mastin | Feb 1976 | A |
4276543 | Miller et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4774498 | Traa | Sep 1988 | A |
4897657 | Brubaker | Jan 1990 | A |
5017924 | Guiberteau et al. | May 1991 | A |
5459465 | Kagey | Oct 1995 | A |
5510736 | Van | Apr 1996 | A |
5748948 | Yu et al. | May 1998 | A |
5777568 | Inoue | Jul 1998 | A |
5793254 | Oconnor | Aug 1998 | A |
5945935 | Kusumoto et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6094075 | Garrett et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6226330 | Mansur | May 2001 | B1 |
6232908 | Nakaigawa | May 2001 | B1 |
6346907 | Dacy et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6384758 | Michalski et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6396329 | Zerbe | May 2002 | B1 |
6400302 | Amazeen et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6462584 | Proebsting | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6546063 | Lee et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6563382 | Yang | May 2003 | B1 |
6624699 | Yin et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6839587 | Yonce | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6879816 | Bult et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6888483 | Mulder | May 2005 | B2 |
6972701 | Jansson | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7075996 | Simon et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7167523 | Mansur | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7188199 | Leung et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7199728 | Dally et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7269212 | Chau et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7285977 | Kim | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7372295 | Wei | May 2008 | B1 |
7372390 | Yamada | May 2008 | B2 |
7397302 | Bardsley et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7528758 | Ishii | May 2009 | B2 |
7560957 | Chen et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7635990 | Ren et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7656321 | Wang | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7683720 | Yehui et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7688102 | Bae et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7688887 | Gupta et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7697915 | Behzad et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7804361 | Lim et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7957472 | Wu et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8000664 | Khorram | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8030999 | Chatterjee et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8106806 | Toyomura et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8159375 | Abbasfar | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8159376 | Abbasfar | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8183930 | Kawakami et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8537886 | Shumarayev et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8547272 | Nestler et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8581824 | Baek et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8604879 | Mourant et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8643437 | Chiu et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8674861 | Matsuno et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8687968 | Nosaka et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8704583 | Bulzacchelli et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8791735 | Shibasaki | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8841936 | Nakamura | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8860590 | Yamagata et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8861583 | Liu | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9069995 | Cronie | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9100232 | Hormati et al. | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9106465 | Walter | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9148087 | Tajalli | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9178503 | Hsieh | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9281785 | Sjöland | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9288089 | Cronie et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9292716 | Winoto et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9300503 | Holden et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9755599 | Yuan et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
10003315 | Tajalli | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10193716 | Hormati et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10326623 | Tajalli | Jun 2019 | B1 |
10742451 | Tajalli | Aug 2020 | B2 |
20010006538 | Simon et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020050861 | Nguyen et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020149508 | Hamashita | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020158789 | Yoshioka et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020174373 | Chang | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030016763 | Doi et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030085763 | Schrodinger et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030132791 | Hsieh | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030160749 | Tsuchi | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030174023 | Miyasita | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030184459 | Engl | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030218558 | Mulder | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040027185 | Fiedler | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040169529 | Afghani et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050008099 | Brown | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050057379 | Jansson | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050218980 | Kalb | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050270098 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060036668 | Jaussi et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060097786 | Su et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060103463 | Lee et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060192598 | Baird et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060194598 | Kim et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070009018 | Wang | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070097579 | Amamiya | May 2007 | A1 |
20070104299 | Cahn et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070159247 | Lee et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070176708 | Otsuka et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070182487 | Ozasa et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070188367 | Yamada | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070201546 | Lee | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070285156 | Roberts et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080001626 | Bae et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080107209 | Cheng et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080165841 | Wall et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080187037 | Bulzacchelli et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090090333 | Spadafora et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090115523 | Akizuki et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090146719 | Pernia et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090323864 | Tired | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100148819 | Bae et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100156691 | Taft | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100219781 | Kuwamura | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235673 | Abbasfar | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100271107 | Tran et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110028089 | Komori | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110032977 | Hsiao et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110051854 | Kizer et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110057727 | Cranford et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110096054 | Cho et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110103508 | Mu et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110133816 | Wu et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110156819 | Kim et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120025911 | Zhao et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120044021 | Yeh et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120133438 | Tsuchi et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120249217 | Fukuda et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130106513 | Cyrusian et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130114663 | Ding et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130147553 | Iwamoto | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130195155 | Pan et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130215954 | Beukema et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130259113 | Kumar | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130334985 | Kim et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140119479 | Tajalli | May 2014 | A1 |
20140176354 | Yang | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140177696 | Hwang | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140203794 | Pietri et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140266440 | Itagaki et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140312876 | Hanson et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150070201 | Dedic et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150146771 | Walter | May 2015 | A1 |
20150198647 | Atwood et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20160013954 | Shokrollahi | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160197747 | Ulrich | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20170085239 | Yuan et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170104458 | Cohen et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170214374 | Tajalli | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170302237 | Akter et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170309346 | Tajalli et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180076985 | Schell | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20190199557 | Taylor et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190221153 | Tsuchi et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20200321778 | Gharibdoust et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20210248103 | Khashaba et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0425064 | May 1991 | EP |
2018052657 | Mar 2018 | WO |
2019241081 | Dec 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2019/036170, dated Aug. 19, 2019, 1-14 (14 pages). |
Anadigm , “Using the Anadigm Multiplier CAM”, Design Brief 208, www.anadigm.com, Copyright 2002, 2002, (6 pages). |
Dickson, Timothy , et al., “A 1.8 pJ/bit 16×16 Gb/s Source-Sychronous Parallel Interface in 32 nm SOR CMOS with Receiver Redundancy for Link Recalibration”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 51, No. 8, Jul. 8, 2016, 1744-1755 (12 pages). |
Kim, Kyu-Young , et al., “8 mW 1.65-Gbps continuous-time equalizer with clock attenuation detection for digital display interface”, Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing, Kluwer Academic Publishers, vol. 63, No. 2, Oct. 11, 2009, 329-337 (9 pages). |
Palmisano, G. , et al., “A Replica Biasing for Constant-Gain Cmos Open-Loop Amplifiers”, Circuits and Systems, IEEE International Symposium in Monterey, CA, May 31, 1998, 363-366 (4 pages). |
Schneider, J. , et al., “ELEC301 Project: Building an Analog Computer”, http://www.clear.rice.edu/elec301/Projects99/anlgcomp/, Dec. 19, 1999, (9 pages). |
Shekhar, S. , et al., “Design Considerations for Low-Power Receiver Front-End in High-Speed Data Links”, Proceedings of the IEEE 2013 Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, Sep. 22, 2013, 1-8 (8 pages). |
Takahashi, Masayoshi , et al., “A 2-GHz Gain Equalizer for Analog Signal Transmission Using Feedforward Compensation by a Low-Pass Filter”, IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, vol. E94A, No. 2, Feb. 2011, 611-616 (6 pages). |
Tierney, J. , “A Digital Frequency Synthesizer”, Audio and Electroacoustics, IEEE Transactions, pp. 48-57, vol. 19, No. 1, Abstract, Mar. 1971, (1 page). |
Wang, Hui , et al., “Equalization Techniques for High-Speed Serial Interconnect Transceivers”, Solid-State and Integrated-Circuit Technology, 9th International Conference on ICSICT, Piscataway, NJ, Oct. 20, 2008, 1-4 (4 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200374158 A1 | Nov 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62684538 | Jun 2018 | US | |
62683955 | Jun 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16435412 | Jun 2019 | US |
Child | 16988469 | US |