The invention relates to a passive polarization stabilizer and applications thereof in optical systems and sub-systems.
Polarization stabilization is required in many applications. For example, low-loss telecommunications optical fiber is not polarization preserving. Consequently, light emerging from such fiber will have an undefined polarization state. On the other hand, many devices which may be arranged to receive light from an optical fiber are sensitive to the polarization state of the input light. Examples of such polarization sensitive devices are semiconductor optical amplifiers (SOA's), interferometric fiber sensors, electro-optical modulators, wavelength division multiplexing couplers and electro-optical switches based on electro-optic crystals or liquid crystals. The use of polarization preserving fiber can solve the problem, but is often unattractive since polarization preserving fiber is relatively costly and has higher loss, and may not even be possible for many telecommunications applications where devices must be compatible with existing installed fiber.
To provide polarization stabilization, many types of active polarization stabilizers are available. By active it is meant that an element of the device is controlled according to a feed-back (or feed-forward) signal derived from a signal indicative of the polarization state. Active polarization stabilizers are known that control a birefringent element or a Faraday rotator based on a feed-back signal. However, for many telecommunications networks, active devices are to be avoided if possible in view of reliability issues and the need to supply power to the device.
Passive polarization stabilizers would thus, in principal, be attractive devices for many applications. For example, a passive polarization stabilizer could be used as a component in a passive optical network. Generally speaking, a passive device can be expected to be more reliable and less complex and costly than a comparable active device.
At the present time, the inventors know of no commercially available passive polarization stabilizer.
A polarization stabilizer is proposed in JP-A-8248358 (reference [1]). However, it is not understood how this proposed device could possibly function in practice, because its design does not take account of the fact that the phase difference between the two beams at the end of the arms (optical transmission lines 3-1, 3-2) is dependent on the input polarization state. The interference of these beams on recombination (at optical muliplexer 2) would produce an output power that is dependent on the input polarization state. The polarization stabilization function would therefore not be achieved.
According to a first aspect of the invention there is provided a polarization stabilizing device comprising:
an input light path for receiving a light signal having an undefined polarization state;
a divider arranged in the input light path to split the light signal into first and second components;
a first interferometric arm arranged to receive from the divider the first component of the light signal;
a second interferometric arm arranged to receive from the divider the second component of the light signal;
an output path for outputting the light signal from the first and second interferometric arms;
at least one polarizer arranged either in the first and second interferometric arms, or in the output path, to define an output polarization state for the light signal; and
at least one retarder arranged in at least one of the first and second interferometric arms to generate first and second polarization states in the first and second interferometric arms, respectively, that are orthogonal to each other for at least one polarization state of the input light signal so that the first polarization state is transmitted by the at least one polarizer and the second polarization state is absorbed by the at least one polarizer, thereby to output the light signal in the output polarization state defined by the at least one polarizer.
The polarization stabilizing device is purely passive and is based on interferometric principals. There is no active feed-back mechanism of any kind. The polarization stabilizing device may be attractive for use in an optical network, especially a passive optical network.
With this arrangement, at a particular input polarization state (or its orthogonal state), the two polarization states at the ends of the interferometric arms are orthogonal to each other, with one being transmitted and the other being eliminated.
Splitting and recombination of the light at the beginning and end of the two interferometric arms is preferably carried out in a manner that is insensitive to the alignment of the input polarization state, and the polarization states in the two arms respectively. Recombination is however sensitive to the relative polarization states in the two interferometric arms, as defined above.
A phase shifter may be provided in one of the first and second interferometric arms to ensure that there is an optical path difference between the first and second interferometric arms that is higher than a coherence length specified for the light signal.
A combiner may be arranged to combine the first and second components of the light signal into the output path.
The at least one polarizer may comprise a polarizing element placed in the output path, a polarizing element placed in both the interferometer arms, or two polarizing elements, one placed in each interferometer arm.
The at least one retarder may comprises a retarding element arranged in either of the interferometer arms, or two retarding elements, one in each arm.
According to a second aspect of the invention there is provided an optical component, comprising: an optical device having an input for receiving an input light signal, the optical device being sensitive to the polarization state of its input signal; and a polarization stabilizing device according to the first aspect of the invention arranged to stabilize the polarization state of the input signal prior to supply to the input of the optical device. The optical device may be a semiconductor optical amplifier (SOA), electro-optic switch or optical splitter.
According to a third aspect of the invention there is provided a method of polarization stabilization, comprising: inputting a light signal into an interferometer arrangement comprising first and second arms having an optical path difference therebetween greater than the coherence length of the light signal; and applying a polarization so that one of the orthogonal polarization states is absorbed while the other is transmitted. The polarization may be applied in both the first and second arms, or subsequent to recombination of the light signal after the first and second arms.
The optical path difference between the arms of the interferometer needs to be greater than the coherence length of the light signal being stabilized. Generally for low-coherence light a relatively small optical path difference will suffice, whereas for a high-coherence light, a greater optical path difference will be needed.
For example, a light source having a center wavelength of 1550 nm and a bandwidth of 2 nm has a coherence length of 1.2 mm. In that case, an optical path difference of 1 cm between the interferometer arms will be satisfactory. The polarization stabilizing device and method can be incorporated into an optical communication system that uses a broadband light source in order to avoid polarization noise at the receiver. The polarization stabilizer can conveniently be placed after a transmission link made of standard telecommunications fiber on the input side of a polarization sensitive element. Polarization stabilization is beneficial in this position, since the local birefringence of standard telecommunications fiber is randomly time varying as a result of thermal and mechanical perturbations. Light emitted from the end of a transmission fiber thus generally has a polarization state showing random temporal fluctuations. Without polarization stabilization, the randomly varying polarization state will cause degradation of receiver performance. More specifically, the random variation of polarization will result in a random variation in the intensity output from polarization sensitive optical devices in the receiver.
Broadband light may find application in wavelength division multiplex (WDM) systems in which broadband light from a single source is spectrum-sliced by a WDM demultiplexer. One example of a suitable broadband source is a superluminescent diode (SLD). Another example is amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) from an erbium-doped fiber amplifier (EDFA). In such a system, the broadband light from the broadband source is spectrum-sliced by a WDM demultiplexer. Spectrum-sliced WDM of this kind has potential cost and complexity advantages over a comparable WDM system in which each wavelength channel has a dedicated laser (i.e. narrowband) source.
For a better understanding of the invention and to show how the same may be carried into effect reference is now made by way of example to the accompanying drawings in which:
First Embodiment
The device delivers an output from the output 108 that has a fixed polarization state defined by the alignment of the linear polarizer 118. Moreover, the output light has substantially constant power, regardless of the polarization state of the input light received at the input 106.
The device is all-passive, having no active components, but nevertheless will deliver an output light signal with defined polarization and constant optical power from an input beam having an arbitrarily time-varying polarization state.
For polarization stabilization to be achieved, it is necessary that the optical path difference between the two interferometer arms 114 and 116 is higher than the coherence length of the light beam. A suitable optical path difference can be provided by inserting some kind of phase-shifting element in one or other of the two interferometer arms. If the envisaged light source is very broadband, then it may not be necessary for any specific phase shifting element to be included. However, in cases where a specific phase shifting element is needed, this may comprise an additional length of optical fiber for a fiber interferometer. Alternatively, for a free-space interferometer, the phase shifter may be a simple glass plate.
The principles of operation of the device of
An input optical beam with central frequency νo and spectral bandwidth Δν is now considered. The coherence length of such a beam is Lc=c/Δν, where c is the speed of light. Moreover, the condition of quasi-monochromaticity is assumed. In other words, it is assumed that the spectral bandwidth is much less than the central frequency so that retardation between the principal axes of the waveplate is nearly π over the entire spectrum of the light beam. The action of the interferometric device on each monochromatic component of the optical beam is described by the following Jones matrix:
where δ is the phase delay between the two arms of the interferometer and the slow axis is taken to be at 0°. By means of matrix algebra, the expression (1) becomes:
It is then possible to determine the Mueller matrix that represents the device according to the methodology described by Jerrard (reference [2]). Using this methodology, the Jones matrix (2) provides the following expression:
where:
are the Pauli matrices and J* is the transpose of the complex conjugate of J. Finally, the Mueller matrix of the device is:
The Stokes vector that represents the input optical beam is [1 s1 s2 s3]. It then follows that the output Stokes vector is:
The output linear polarization state is linear with an azimuth of 45°. The output optical power depends on the phase delay between the two arms of the interferometer. This phase delay δ is frequency-dependent according to the following expression:
where ΔL is the optical path difference between the two arms. The output Stokes vector (3) is also frequency-dependent. Its first element is the power spectral transmission of the interferometric device. The input spectral power density ρin(ν) and the output spectral power density ρout(ν) are then given by the following expression:
To obtain the output optical power for broadband light, the power spectral transmission function (4) is integrated weighted by the input power spectral density ρin(ν):
The functions sin δ(ν) and cos δ(ν) have a periodicity c/ΔL (in frequency) and provide a certain number of periods Np in a given bandwidth Δν, namely:
If the optical path difference between the two arms ΔL is much higher than the beam coherence length Lc then the integrals of the functions sin δ(ν) and cos δ(ν) weighted by the input power spectral density ρin (ν) approach zero, since the negative and positive contributions to the integrals cancel out. It therefore results that:
for ΔL>>Lc.
It is noted that the output polarization state is linear with azimuth of 45°, by virtue of the action of the polarizer.
In summary, the above analysis shows that the optical beam at the output of the device has a fixed linear polarization state and, moreover, that the transmitted power is independent of the input polarization state, provided that the condition ΔL>>Lc is satisfied.
Example of First Embodiment
The positioning of the polarizer 118 in each of the interferometric arms is functionally the same as arranging a polarizer after the interferometric recombination of the two arms, as illustrated in FIG. 1. The positioning of the polarizer in
The free-space implementation of the interferometer arms has the advantage of avoiding any birefringence effects, which would degrade the device performance.
The performance of the polarization stabilizer of
The output power spectral density ρout(ν) is thus equal to a modulation of the input power spectral density ρin(ν) with period c/ΔL. This period is given in terms of frequency. The corresponding period in wavelength is λ2/ΔL. The wavelength difference between adjacent peaks in
To verify the effectiveness of the device for polarization stabilization, the azimuth of the linear polarization state of the input beam was rotated through 180° while maintaining the same input intensity.
The results of
Consequently, if the input light signal has constant power, the output light signal will also have constant power. Equally, if the input light source is amplitude modulated (but of unstable or varying polarization), the amplitude modulation will be faithfully reproduced in the polarization stabilized output. Still further, the losses of the device are relatively small, so that the output power is close to one quarter of the input power as predicted by equation (4). The experimental results of
Second Embodiment
The half wave plate 225 is aligned at an azimuth of the slow axis of 0° and the linear polarizer 218 at an angle of 45°. The linear polarizer 218′ in the second interferometric arm is similarly aligned at 45°. The two arms 214 and 216 then re-combine in a further 50/50 fiber coupler 224 and the light is then guided to an output 208 through a further optical fiber section 212.
The device of
It will thus be understood from the description of the devices of
Third Embodiment
The device of
An elliptical retarder is an optical element which has two orthogonal elliptical polarization eigenstates and which introduces a phase retardation between them. An elliptical polarizer is an optical element which transmits a particular elliptical polarization state without intensity loss and absorbs its orthogonal elliptical polarization state. Any desired degree of elliptical polarization can be realized with a linear polarizer placed between two quarter waveplates with orthogonal fast axes.
The fundamental condition to be satisfied by any embodiment of the present invention (whether Mach-Zehnder based or otherwise) is that, in order to obtain polarization stabilization, the polarization states in the two interferometer arms have to be orthogonal subsequent to the retardation action which may be performed either in one or both of the interferometer arms. Choice of a suitable polarizer then allows one of the two orthogonal states to be absorbed while the other is transmitted, thus stabilizing the output polarization state independent of the input polarization state.
By means of a Poincaré sphere representation (see reference [2]), many specific examples of configurations of the third embodiment can be envisaged, as now discussed. There is a one-to-one correspondence between the points on the Poincaré sphere and the polarization states. The linear states correspond to the equator and the circular states correspond to the two poles. Two orthogonal states correspond to two diametrically opposed points. The action of an elliptical retarder is represented on the Poincaré sphere by a rotation around the axis joining the two orthogonal eigenstates of the retarder. The angle of rotation is equal to the phase difference between the two eigenstates.
For generating some specific examples, the following discussion is restricted to the use of three different elliptical retarders, all corresponding to rotation of 180° around three orthogonal axes passing through the center of the Poincaré sphere. These three examples are (i) a half-wave plate with slow axis at 0°, (ii) a half-wave plate with slow axis at 45°, and (iii) a rotator of 90°. One of these elliptical retarders is considered to be present on the first interferometric arm, while no retarder is provided in the other arm. In other words, the further elliptical retarder 336 is omitted.
In Example 1, the elliptical retarder 334 takes the form of a half-wave plate (λ/2) with slow axis at 0° (in fact this is the same as in
If the elliptical retarder is a half-wave plate (λ/2) with slow axis at 45° then this will transform into the orthogonal state any polarization state belonging to the great circle that passes through a circular state and the linear state at 0°, i.e. any elliptical state with a semi-axis at 0°. In order to obtain polarization stabilization, the elliptical polarizer will thus need to project the polarization state into an elliptical state with semi-axis at 0°. Specific examples of polarizers which will perform this function are a linear polarizer (LP) aligned at 0° or 90° or a circular polarizer (CP).
If a rotator (R) of 90° is used as the elliptical retarder this will transform into the orthogonal state any polarization state belonging to the equator, i.e. any linear state. In order to obtain polarization stabilization, the polarizer will thus need to project the polarization state into a linear state. Consequently, a linear polarizer with any alignment will work in this case.
Fourth Embodiment
System Example 1
System Example 2
System Example 3
It will thus be understood that a passive polarization device according to embodiments of the invention may find general use in a variety of applications.
It will be appreciated that although particular embodiments of the invention have been described, many modifications/additions and/or substitutions may be made within the spirit and scope of the present invention.
References
1. JP-A-8248358
2. H G Jerrard: “Modern description of polarized light: matrix methods”, Optics and Laser Technology, December 1982, pages 309-319
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
00305236 | Jun 2000 | EP | regional |
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/214,501, filed Jun. 27, 2000, which is incorporated by reference herein, and claims the right to priority based on European Application No. 0305236.2 filed Jun. 21, 2000.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3728030 | Hawes | Apr 1973 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 394 605 | Oct 1990 | EP |
2 174 505 | Nov 1986 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020037126 A1 | Mar 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60214501 | Jun 2000 | US |