Passive wave division multiplexed transmitter having a directly modulated laser array

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8260150
  • Patent Number
    8,260,150
  • Date Filed
    Friday, April 25, 2008
    16 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 4, 2012
    12 years ago
Abstract
An wave division multiplexed (WDM) optical transmitter is disclosed including a directly modulated laser array and a planar lightwave chip (PLC) having a plurality of OSRs that receive outputs of the laser array and increase the extinction ratio of the received light. An optical multiplexer receives the outputs of the OSRs and couples them to a single output port. The multiplexer has transmission peaks through its ports each having a 0.5 dB bandwidth including the frequency of a laser in the array. The optical multiplexer may be embodied as cascaded Mach-Zehnder interferometers or ring resonators.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. The Field of the Invention


This application relates to fiber optic transmitters, and, more particularly to wave division multiplexed (WDM) transmitters.


2. The Relevant Technology


One means for increasing the capacity of a fiber optic network is to use wave division multiplexing (WDM) wherein optical signals having different wavelengths are transmitted simultaneously through the fiber. For example, the industry standard for the transmitter optical sub-assembly (TOSA) for 100 Gb/s Ethernet is expected to include wavelength division multiplexing of 4 transmitters at 25 Gb/s.


One proposed transmitter implementing this standard includes a co-package of an array of externally modulated lasers (EML), such as a monolithically integrated DFB laser and external electro-absorption modulator, a wave division multiplexer (WDM), an array of photodiodes, and output fiber coupling assembly. Other proposed transmitters include a directly modulated arrayed distributed feedback (DFB) laser.


Externally modulated lasers have the significant disadvantage of being bulky due to the requirement of both a laser and an external modulator. They further require more power inasmuch as both the laser and external modulator are powered. They also require a high degree of integration, which makes them difficult to manufacture with high yields. EML have been demonstrated at 40 Gb/s with extinction ratio>=10 dB and dispersion tolerance of ˜40 ps/nm (Okayasu, M. et al, A 1550-nm 40-Gbit/s electro-absorption DFB laser diode module for transponders with very short reach (<2 km) applications, LEOS 2004, page: 513-514).


Directly modulated multi-wavelength integrated DFB laser arrays have been deployed widely as wavelength selective laser source, but the extinction ratio (ER) of most directly modulated lasers is less than 7 dB, which is less than the required ER for most applications. The highest ER reported for 40 Gb/s direct modulated DFB laser is 5 dB, Nakahara K., et al, “40-Gb/s direct modulation with high extinction ratio operation of 1.3-um InGaAlAs multiquantum well ridge waveguide distributed feedback lasers,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, Vol. 19, October, 2007, pp. 1436-1438. Other directly modulated lasers provide better extinction ratios, however WDM system incorporating such lasers have not been demonstrated.


In view of the foregoing it would be an advancement in the art to provide a compact WDM transmitter using a directly modulated laser array that further provides an extinction ratio at least as high as 7 dB. It would be a further advancement in the art to provide such a transmitter that was readily manufacturable.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In one aspect of the invention, an optical transmitter includes a laser array comprising a plurality of lasers each tuned to a unique frequency. A planar lightwave chip (PLC) abuts the laser array and includes a plurality of optical spectrum reshapers (OSRs) each positioned to receive light from one of the plurality of lasers and configured to enhance an extinction ratio of the received light. An optical multiplexer is optically coupled to each of the plurality of OSRs and has an output proximate a first edge of the PLC. The optical multiplexer has transmission peaks having a 0.5 dB bandwidth including the corresponding frequency of one of the plurality of lasers of the laser array.


In another aspect of the invention, the optical multiplexer has transmission peaks having a 0.5 dB bandwidth equal to between 25 and 45 percent, preferably at least 40 percent, of the separation between the transmission peaks.


In another aspect of the invention, each of the plurality of OSRs is adapted to transmit a portion of light received from the lasers of the laser array and to reject a portion. A first plurality of waveguides transmit at least a portion of the transmitted light to a second edge of the PLC and a second plurality of waveguides transmit at least a portion of the rejected light to a third edge of the PLC. A first array of photodetectors detect light from the first plurality of waveguides and a second array of photodetectors detect light from the second plurality of waveguides. A controller receives outputs from the first and second arrays of photodetectors and controls index of refraction adjusting elements coupled to each of the OSRs according to a ratio of the outputs at a predetermined ratio.


In another aspect of the invention the multiplexer is embodied as cascaded Mach-Zehnder interferometers or ring resonators.


These and other objects and features of the present invention will become more fully apparent from the following description and appended claims, or may be learned by the practice of the invention as set forth hereinafter.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

To further clarify the above and other advantages and features of the present invention, a more particular description of the invention will be rendered by reference to specific embodiments thereof which are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is appreciated that these drawings depict only typical embodiments of the invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope. The invention will be described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings in which:



FIG. 1 illustrates a WDM transmitter having a laser array and planar lightwave circuit in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 2 illustrates an optical spectrum reshaper (OSR) suitable for use in the WDM transmitter of FIG. 1 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 3 illustrates that transmission function of a Mach-Zehnder interferometer for use in the multiplexer of a WDM transmitter in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 4 illustrates that transmission function of the ports of a multiplexer for use in a WDM transmitter in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 5 illustrates a ring resonator suitable for use in the multiplexer of a WDM transmitter in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; and



FIG. 6 illustrates the transmission function of a ring resonator for different coupling efficiencies.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Referring to FIG. 1, a laser transmitter 10 includes a laser array 12 including lasers 14a-14d each tuned to a different wavelength. The wavelength of each laser 14a-14d may be defined as a base or carrier frequency in embodiments where the lasers 14a-14d are frequency modulated or chirped. For example, in a preferred embodiment, the lasers 14a-14d are modulated with a data signal to produce an adiabatically chirped signal having both amplitude and frequency modulation encoding a data signal. The signal output by the lasers 14a-14d will include a base, or “zero-level,” frequency with frequency excursions to a peak frequency encoding the data signal. In such embodiments the wavelength of each laser 14a-14d may be defined as either the base or peak frequency.


In a preferred embodiment, each laser 14a-14d has a nominal wavelength differing from each of the other lasers 14a-14d by an integer multiple of a wavelength difference Δλ. However, the wavelengths of the lasers 14a-14d may vary due to manufacturing limitations and may be independently tunable away from their nominal wavelengths such that the difference in wavelength between adjacent lasers 14a-14d is not necessarily equal to Δλ. In the illustrated embodiment, lasers 14a-14d have nominal wavelengths of λ1, λ1+Δλ, λ1+2Δλ, and λ1+3Δλ, respectively. In a preferred embodiment, the wavelengths of the lasers 14a-14d differ from their nominal wavelengths by no more than 20% of Δλ, more preferably by less than 10% of Δλ.


The relationship between amplitude modulation, frequency modulation and modulation current supplied to the lasers 14a-14d can be expressed by following rate equations (Sato K., et al, Chirp characteristics of 40-Gb/s directly modulated distributed-feedback laser diodes, Journal of lightwave technology, vol. 23, November 2005, pp. 3790-3797):












N



t


=


I
qV

-

N

τ
e


-


v
g


gS






(

Eq
.




1

)









S



t


=


Γ






v
g


gS

-

S

τ
p


-


Γ






R
sp


V






(

Eq
.




2

)






g
=


a


(

N
-

N
0


)



1
+

ɛ





S







(

Eq
.




3

)







Δ





v

=


1

4

π



α





Γ






v
g



a


(

N
-

N
th


)







(

Eq
.




4

)








in which N is the carrier density, q is the electric charge of an electron, V is the volume of the active region, I is the injection current, τe is the lifetime of the carrier, vg is the group velocity of light, g is the gain, S is the photon number density in the cavity, Γ is the optical confinement factor, Rsp is the rate of spontaneous emission, N0 is the transparency carrier density, a is the differential gain coefficient, ε is the gain compression factor, Δν, which is also called chirp, is the deviation of laser frequency from the laser frequency at threshold, Nth is the carrier density at threshold current, and α is the line-width enhancement factor. (Sato K., et al, Chirp characteristics of 40-Gb/s directly modulated distributed-feedback laser diodes, Journal of lightwave technology, vol. 23, November 2005, pp. 3790-3797):



















V
3.00E−17
m3



Γ
0.2



A
9.90E−20
m2



ε
2.77E−23
m3



α
3.5



Rsp
1.18E+12
1/s



τe
7.76E−10
S



τp
1.69E−12
S



vg
8.33E+07
m/s



N0
1.23E+24
m−3



Q
1.60E−19










For a modulation current from 72 mA to 112 mA, for example, the light photon density changes from 4.3×1021 to 7.1×1021, which correspond to an extinction ratio of 2.2 dB. At the same time, the chirp of the laser is ˜12.8 GHz. The required chirp is about half of the bit rate, for example, for 25 Gb/s, the required chirp is ˜12.5 GHz. The size of the chirp can be adjusted by adjusting the modulation current amplitude. The output electrical field of laser can be expressed as follows:










E


(
t
)


=



S


(
t
)





exp


(

j2π


(



v
th


t

+




-


t



Δ






v


(
τ
)





τ




)


)







(

Eq
.




5

)







The laser array 12 is coupled to a planar lightwave circuit (PLC) 16 including a plurality of optical spectrum reshapers (OSR) 18a-18d and a wave division multiplexer (WDM) 18. In a preferred embodiment the laser array 12 is butt coupled to the PLC 16, however other coupling mechanisms are possible. The WDM 20 receives signals from the OSRs 18a-18d and multiplexes the signals onto an output fiber 22 using coupling optics 24. In the illustrated embodiment, the laser array 12 couples to one side of the PLC 16 and the coupling optics are coupled to the opposite side of the PLC 16. The illustrated combination of laser array 12 and PLC 16 provides the distinct advantage over the prior art of not requiring a high degree of integration for the laser array 12. The laser array 12 does not require an external modulator as in other WDM transmitters. Furthermore, the OSRs 18a-18d and WDM 20 are passive elements that are readily combined in a single component.


Each OSR 18a-18d receives optical signals from one of the lasers 14a-14d. Each OSR 18a-18d has a transmission edge corresponding to the frequency of the laser 14a-14d from which it receives signals. In some embodiments, the lasers 14a-14d are directly modulated to generate a frequency modulated signal encoding a data signal. In such embodiments, the frequency modulated signal includes frequency excursions between a base and a peak frequency. In a preferred embodiment, a transmission edge of each OSR 18a-18d either includes one or both of the peak and base frequency or lies between the peak and base frequency of the laser 14a-14d from which it receives signals. Each laser-OSR pairing may be embodied as the laser transmitters disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/272,100, filed Nov. 8, 2005 by Daniel Mahgerefteh et al. for POWER SOURCE FOR A DISPERSION COMPENSATION FIBER OPTIC SYSTEM.


The use of OSRs 18a-18d enables the extinction ratio of the light emitted from the lasers 14a-14d to be improved from 1.5 dB before the OSR 18a-18d to 10 dB after the OSR 18. (Matsui Y., et al, Chirp-managed directly modulated laser (CML), IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, Vol. 18, No. 2, January, 2006, pp 385-pp 387).


Referring to FIG. 2, while still referring to FIG. 1, in some embodiments, the OSRs 18a-18d may each be embodied as Mach-Zehnder interferometers 26. Each interferometer 26 includes a first path 28 and a second path 30. In the illustrated embodiment, the first and second path 28, 30 are coupled to one another by means of 3 dB couplers at two points. The second path 30 has a longer optical path length between the coupling points. The optical path delay of the second path 30 is preferably equivalent to half of the bit period of a transmitted data signal, for example, if the modulation rate is 25 Gb/s, the optical path delay of the second path 30 is 20-ps. For waveguides based on silicon, which has a refractive index of ˜3.5, the optical path difference between the two waveguides would therefore be ˜1.7 mm in this example.


A tuning element 32 is coupled to each interferometer 26 in order to alter the optical path length of one or both of the paths 28, 30 to enable alignment of the transmission edge of the interferometer 26 with respect to the wavelength of one of the lasers 14a-14d. The quality of the signal output from the interferometers 26 depends on the frequency detune between a zero-level signal frequency of the frequency modulated output of the lasers 14a-14d and the transmission peak frequency of the interferometer 26. For an input signal having an extinction ratio of ˜2 dB, an ER of greater than 10 dB may be achieved after the interferometers 26 with a frequency detune of between 20 and 25 GHz.


The tuning element 32 may alter the optical path length of one or both of the first and second paths 28, 30 by means of the thermo-optic effect, electro-optic effect, or some other mechanism. In a preferred embodiment, each tuning element 32 is a thermoelectric cooler positioned over one of the interferometers 26. In an alternative embodiment, the tuning elements 32 are positioned over the lasers 14a-14d for tuning the wavelengths of the lasers relative to the OSRs 18a-18d


The first path 28 has one end positioned to receive light from one of the lasers 14a-14d. The first and second paths 28, 30 further define two output ports 34, 36, respectively, referred to as the bar-port 34 and X-port 36. In the time domain, the output of the Mach-Zehnder interferometer is expressed as in following equations:











E
bar



(
t
)


=


1
2



(



E

i





n




(

t
-



n
1



L
1


c


)


-


E

i





n




(

t
-



n
2



L
2


c


)



)






(

Eq
.




6

)








E
X



(
t
)


=


j
2



(



E

i





n




(

t
-



n
1



L
1


c


)


+


E

i





n




(

t
-



n
2



L
2


c


)



)






(

Eq
.




7

)








where t is time, Ein is the input intensity, n1 and n2 are the indexes of refraction for the first and second paths 28, 30, and L1 and L2 are the lengths of the first and second paths 28, 30.


The port 34 of each of the interferometers 26 is coupled to a waveguide 38 transmitting light to the WDM 20. Waveguides 40 are coupled to the waveguide 38 and transmit a fraction, preferably five percent or less, of the light transmitted from port 34 to one edge of the PLC 16. A photodiode array 42 is positioned at the edge of the PLC 16 and includes photodiodes that each receives light from one of the waveguides 38. The ports 36 are coupled to waveguides 44 transmitting light to one edge of the PLC 16. A photodiode array 46 includes photodiodes each positioned to receive light from one of the waveguides 44. In the illustrated embodiment, the photodiode array 42 and 46 are positioned on opposite sides of the PLC 16 and are positioned on faces perpendicular to the face abutting the laser array 12.


The outputs of the photodiode arrays 42, 46 represent light that is transmitted and rejected, respectively, by the interferometers. A driving circuit may be coupled to the photodiode arrays 42, 46 and to the tuning elements 32. The driving circuit may adjust the optical path lengths of one or both of the paths 28, 30 using the tuning elements 32 such that the ratio of the outputs of the photodiode arrays 42, 46 is maintained at a predetermined value, which effectively maintains the position of the transmission edges of the interferometers 26 in a predetermined relationship to the wavelengths of the lasers 14a-14d.


The ratio which gives the best output waveform can be calibrated at the beginning of the life of the laser transmitter 10. For a silicon waveguide, the thermal refractive index coefficient is ˜1.8×10−4/° C., for a 1.7 mm waveguide. A temperature change of about 5° C. is therefore required to shift the frequency detune of 1 free spectral range (FSR) at 1.55 μm wavelength, or 4° C., to shift the frequency detune of 1 FSR at 1.3 μm wavelength.


In the illustrated embodiment, the WDM 20 is embodied as cascading Mach-Zehnder interferometers. Other implementations are also possible, such as an etched grating or arrayed waveguide grating. A first stage 48 preferably includes one half of the number Mach-Zehnder interferometers as there are lasers 14a-14d or OSRs 18a-18d. Each interferometer 50a, 50b of the first stage include a first input port 52, a second input port 54, and at least one output port 56. The transmission function for the input ports 52, 54 is shown in FIG. 3, wherein line 58 represents the fraction of light transmitted from the input port 52 to the output port 56 for a given wavelength and line 60 represents the fraction of light transmitted from the input port 54 to the output port 56 for a given wavelength. As is apparent from FIG. 3, the transmission functions have identical free spectral range (FSR) and are offset from one another by one half of the FSR. The FSR of the interferometers in the WDM 20 is controlled by the relative delay of the two waveguides forming the MZ interferometer. For a FSR equivalent to 800 GHz and waveguide refractive index of ˜3.5, the optical path difference between the two waveguides of the interferometer is ˜27 μm. For a FSR equivalent to 400 GHz the optical path difference between the two waveguides of MZ3 is ˜54 μm.


For the illustrated embodiment, the input ports 52, 54 of interferometer 50a are coupled to the OSRs 18a, 18c corresponding to the lasers 14a, 14c emitting at the wavelengths λ1 and λ1+2Δλ, respectively. The input ports 52, 54 of interferometer 50b are coupled to the OSRs 18b, 18d coupled to the lasers 14b, 14d emitting at the wavelengths of λ1+Δλ and λ1+3Δλ, respectively. The interferometers 50a, 50b of the first stage have a FSR of 4Δλ and have transmission peaks aligned with the wavelength of the laser from which they receive light.


The output ports 56 of the interferometers 50a, 50b are coupled to input ports 62 and 64, respectively, of one or more interferometers 66 of a second stage 68. The one or more interferometers 66 of the second stage preferably have a FSR equal one half that of the interferometers 50a, 50b of the first stage such that transmission peaks in the second stage 68 are aligned with all of the transmission peaks of the first stage 48.


In the illustrated embodiment, the interferometer 66 of the output stage has input port 62 coupled to the output port 56 of the interferometer 50a and input port 64 coupled to the output port 56 of the interferometer 50b. The interferometer 66 has a FSR of 2Δλ and has transmission peaks through input port 62 at λ1 and λ1+2Δλ and through input port 64 at λ1+Δλ and λ1+3Δλ. The combined first and second stages 48, 58 are therefore able to multiplex the wavelengths of all four lasers 14a-14d onto a single output port 70 of the interferometer 66. The output port 70 is coupled to coupling optics 24 in order to transmit the multiplexed signals over the fiber 22.


Stated generically, a laser array 12 having N lasers L0 . . . Lb . . . LN−1 having a wavelength spacing of Δλ may be coupled to a WDM 20 having log2N stages S0 . . . Sk . . . Slog2N−1, wherein each stage Sk has N/2k+1 interferometers I0 . . . Ir . . . IN/2k+1−1, each having a FSR of (N/2k)Δλ and two input ports Pr,1 and Pr,2 and an output port Or. Each interferometer Ir has a transmission peak through input port Pr,1 at λ1+rΔλ and through input port Pr,2 at λ1+(r+N/2k+1)Δλ.


The input ports Pr,1 and Pr,2 of each interferometer Ir in the first stage S0 are positioned to receive light from the OSRs that receive light from lasers Lr and Lr+N/2k, which are tuned to wavelengths λ1+rΔλ and λ1+(r+N/2)Δλ, respectively. The input ports Pr,1 and Pr,2 of each interferometer Ir in subsequent stages Sk are coupled to the output ports Or and Or+N/2k+1 of the previous stage Sk−1. The output port O0 of the last stage is positioned proximate an edge of the PLC 16 and is coupled to coupling optics for transmitting the multiplexed optical signals through the fiber 22.



FIG. 4 illustrates the transmission function for the illustrated WDM 40. The 0.5 dB bandwidth of the peaks of the transmission function of the inputs of the WDM 40 is preferably between 20 and 45 percent of the separation between transmission peaks. As is apparent from FIG. 4, the 0.5 dB bandwidth 70 of the illustrated embodiment is about 40 percent of the wavelength spacing 72, which is 800 GHz in the illustrated example. The wide 0.5 dB bandwidth 70 provides a tolerance of ˜+/−160 GHz with respect to the wavelengths of the lasers 14a-14d and the transmission edges of the OSRs 18a-18d. In a preferred embodiment, the lasers 14a-14d have wavelengths lying within the 0.5 dB bandwidth 70 of one of the transmission peaks of the input ports of the WDM 40. The wide 0.5 dB bandwidth 70 facilitates manufacture of a workable WDM transmitter notwithstanding variation in the wavelengths of the lasers 14a-14d from an equal wavelength spacing.


Referring to FIG. 5, in some embodiments, the Mach-Zehnder interferometers used for the OSRs 18a-18d may be embodied as ring resonator filters 76 having an input 78, a bar-port 80 and an X-port 82. The bar-port 80 outputs light transmitted by ring resonator filter 76 and is coupled to one of the inputs of the WDM 20 and to the photodiode array 42. The X-port 82 outputs light rejected by the ring resonator filter 76 and is coupled to the photodiode array 46.


The ring resonator filter 76 includes a first waveguide 84, a second waveguide 86, and a ring resonator 88. The ring resonator 88 is coupled to the first waveguide 84 by a first coupler k1 and is coupled to the second waveguide 86 by means of a second coupler k2. The first waveguide is coupled to the input 78 and bar-port 80. The second waveguide 86 is coupled to the X-port 82. The transmission of the bar-port 80 and X-port 82 is described by equation 8 and 9:











E
bar



(
v
)


=




cos


(

kL
1

)


-


cos


(

kL
2

)




exp


(

-


j2π





nLv

c


)





1
-


cos


(

kL
1

)




cos


(

kL
2

)




exp


(

-


j2π





nL





v

c


)








E

i





n




(
v
)







(

Eq
.




8

)








E
X



(
v
)


=




sin


(

kL
1

)




sin


(

kL
2

)




1
-


cos


(

kL
1

)




cos


(

kL
2

)




exp


(

-


j2π





nL





v

c


)








E

i





n




(
v
)







(

Eq
.




9

)








in which, kL1 is the coupling efficiency of coupler k1, kL2 is the coupling efficiency of coupler k2, nL is the optical path delay of the ring 88, and ν is the optical frequency of the input field.



FIG. 6 illustrates the transmission spectrum of the bar port 80 for different values of kL, for kL=kL1=kL2, to maintain the contrasting ratio of the transmission spectrum. The delay of the ring 88 in the example of FIG. 5 is 8 ps. As is apparent from FIG. 5, a ring resonator filter provides the opportunity of optimizing the slope of the OSR by varying the coupling coefficient of the coupler by design.


The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is, therefore, indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description. All changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.

Claims
  • 1. An optical transmitter comprising; a laser array comprising a plurality of frequency modulated lasers each tuned to a corresponding wavelength of a plurality of wavelengths;a planar lightwave chip (PLC) abutting the laser array, the PLC comprising: a plurality of optical spectrum reshapers (OSRs), each having a transmission edge and each positioned to receive light from one of the plurality of frequency modulated lasers having a corresponding frequency thereof located nearest the transmission edge relative to other frequency modulated lasers of the laser array, wherein each of the plurality of OSRs is adapted to receive input light and to output a transmitted portion and a rejected portion of the input light; andan optical multiplexer optically coupled to each of the plurality of OSRs and having an output proximate a first edge of the PLC, the optical multiplexer having transmission peaks each aligned with the corresponding frequency of one of the plurality of frequency modulated lasers of the laser array;a first plurality of waveguides each having a first end positioned to receive a portion of the transmitted light from one of the plurality of OSRs and having a second end positioned proximate a second edge of the PLC;a first array of photodetectors positioned proximate the second ends of the plurality of waveguides; anda second plurality of waveguides each having a first end positioned to receive a portion of the rejected light and a second end positioned proximate a third edge of the PLC;a second array of photodetectors positioned proximate the second ends of the plurality of waveguides;a plurality of index of refraction adjusting elements each coupled to one of the plurality of OSRs; anda controller coupled to the plurality of index of refraction adjusting elements, the first array of photodetectors, and the second array of photodetectors, the controller configured to adjust inputs to the plurality of index of refraction adjusting elements according to outputs from the first and second arrays of photodetectors.
  • 2. The optical transmitter of claim 1, wherein the transmission peaks of the optical multiplexer have a 0.5 dB bandwidth thereof including the corresponding frequency of one of the plurality of lasers of the laser array.
  • 3. The optical transmitter of claim 2, wherein the 0.5 dB bandwidth of the transmission peaks is equal to at least 40% of a frequency separation between the transmission peaks.
  • 4. The optical transmitter of claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of OSRs includes first and second waveguides each having an input and an output, the first and second waveguides being coupled to one another at two points between the input and output thereof, the second waveguide having an optical path length between the two points that is longer than the optical path length of the first waveguide between the two points, the output of the second waveguide of each OSR being coupled through a corresponding one of the second plurality of waveguides to the second array of photodetectors and the output of the first waveguide being coupled to the optical multiplexer and through a corresponding one of the first plurality of waveguides to the first array of photo detectors.
  • 5. The optical transmitter of claim 4, wherein the index of refraction adjusting elements comprise thermoelectric coolers.
  • 6. The optical transmitter of claim 1, wherein the OSRs are Mach-Zehnder interferometers.
  • 7. The optical transmitter of claim 1, wherein the multiplexer comprises cascaded Mach-Zehnder interferometers.
  • 8. The optical transmitter of claim 7, wherein pairs of the plurality of OSRs are each coupled to first and second inputs of one of the Mach-Zehnder interferometers of the cascaded Mach-Zehnder interferometers and wherein the OSRs of each pair have transmission edges offset from one another by a frequency difference multiplied by one half the number of lasers in the plurality of lasers.
  • 9. The optical transmitter of claim 1, wherein the multiplexer comprises cascaded ring resonator filters.
  • 10. An optical transmitter comprising: a laser array comprising a plurality of lasers each tuned to a corresponding frequency of a plurality of frequencies; anda plurality of optical spectrum reshapers (OSRs) having a transmission edge and being positioned to receive light from one of the plurality of lasers having the corresponding frequency thereof located nearest the transmission edge relative to other lasers of the plurality of lasers; andan optical multiplexer having a plurality of ports optically coupled to the plurality of OSRs, each port of the plurality of ports having a transmission peak overlapping at least a portion of the transmission edge of the OSRs to which it is coupled, the transmission peaks of the ports having a 0.5 dB bandwidth equal to between 20 and 45 percent of a frequency separation between the transmission peaks.
  • 11. The optical transmitter of claim 10, wherein the transmission peaks of the ports have a 0.5 dB bandwidth equal to at least 40 percent of the frequency separation between the transmission peaks.
  • 12. The optical transmitter of claim 10, wherein the plurality of OSRs and the optical multiplexer are formed on the same planar lightwave circuit (PLC) coupled to the laser array.
  • 13. The optical transmitter of claim 10, wherein the OSRs are Mach-Zehnder interferometers.
  • 14. The optical transmitter of claim 10, wherein the multiplexer comprises cascaded Mach-Zehnder interferometers.
  • 15. The optical transmitter of claim 14, wherein pairs of the plurality of OSRs are each coupled to first and second inputs of one of the Mach-Zehnder interferometers of the cascaded Mach-Zehnder interferometers and wherein the OSRs of each pair have transmission edges offset from one another by a frequency difference multiplied by one half the number of lasers in the plurality of lasers.
  • 16. The optical transmitter of claim 10, wherein the multiplexer comprises cascaded ring resonator filters.
  • 17. A method for transmitting multiplexed optical signals comprising: directly modulating a plurality of lasers to generate first signals encoding data, wherein directly modulating the plurality of lasers to generate the first signals comprises modulating each of the lasers between a base frequency to a peak frequency to encode a data signal, wherein each laser transmits at a different base and peak frequency;transmitting the first signals through a plurality of optical spectrum reshapers (OSRs) to generate second signals having an increased extinction ratio relative to the first signals;transmitting the second signals into ports of an optical multiplexer;coupling an output of the optical multiplexer to an optical fiber; andtuning a peak transmission frequency of the plurality of optical spectrum reshapers to be distanced by a preset detune amount from the base frequency of a laser of the plurality of lasers from which it receives one of the first signals;wherein each of the ports of the optical multiplexer has a transmission peak overlapping at least a portion of a transmission edge of the OSR to which it is coupled, the transmission peaks of the ports having a 0.5 dB bandwidth equal to between 20 and 45 percent of a frequency separation between the transmission peaks.
  • 18. The method of claim 17, wherein transmitting the first signals through the plurality of optical spectrum reshapers to generate second signals having an increased extinction ratio relative to the first signals comprises for each first signal: transmitting the first signal into a first waveguide;coupling a portion of the first signal to a second waveguide coupled to the first waveguide at two points and having a longer path length between the two points; andoutputting a first portion of the first signal from the first waveguide.
  • 19. The method of claim 18, further comprising for each first signal: outputting a second portion of the first signal from the second waveguide and transmitting the second portion to a first array of photodetectors;transmitting a fraction of the first portion to a second array of photodetectors; andtuning an index of refraction of at least one of the first and second waveguides according to outputs from the first and second arrays of photodetectors.
  • 20. The method of claim 19, wherein tuning the index of refraction of at least one of the first and second waveguides according to outputs from the first and second arrays of photodetectors comprises controlling the temperature of a thermoelectric cooler positioned over at least one of the first and second waveguides.
US Referenced Citations (221)
Number Name Date Kind
3324295 Harris Jun 1967 A
3973216 Hughes et al. Aug 1976 A
3999105 Archey et al. Dec 1976 A
4038600 Thomas et al. Jul 1977 A
4561119 Epworth Dec 1985 A
4671604 Soref Jun 1987 A
4754459 Westbrook Jun 1988 A
4805235 Henmi Feb 1989 A
4841519 Nishio Jun 1989 A
4896325 Coldren Jan 1990 A
4908833 Chraplyvy et al. Mar 1990 A
4914667 Blonder et al. Apr 1990 A
5088097 Ono et al. Feb 1992 A
5119393 Oka et al. Jun 1992 A
5136598 Weller et al. Aug 1992 A
5170402 Ogita et al. Dec 1992 A
5177630 Goutzoulis et al. Jan 1993 A
5293545 Huber Mar 1994 A
5325378 Zorabedian Jun 1994 A
5325382 Emura et al. Jun 1994 A
5371625 Wedding et al. Dec 1994 A
5373383 LaGasse Dec 1994 A
5394429 Yamada et al. Feb 1995 A
5412474 Reasenberg et al. May 1995 A
5416629 Huber May 1995 A
5434693 Tanaka et al. Jul 1995 A
5450432 Okuda Sep 1995 A
5459799 Weber Oct 1995 A
5465264 Buhler et al. Nov 1995 A
5477368 Eskildsen et al. Dec 1995 A
5550667 Krimmel et al. Aug 1996 A
5568311 Matsumoto Oct 1996 A
5592327 Gabl et al. Jan 1997 A
5642371 Tohyama et al. Jun 1997 A
5696859 Onaka et al. Dec 1997 A
5737104 Lee et al. Apr 1998 A
5777773 Epworth et al. Jul 1998 A
5805235 Bedard Sep 1998 A
5856980 Doyle Jan 1999 A
5920416 Beylat et al. Jul 1999 A
5946129 Xu et al. Aug 1999 A
5953139 Nemecek et al. Sep 1999 A
5953361 Borchert Sep 1999 A
5974209 Cho et al. Oct 1999 A
6018275 Perrett et al. Jan 2000 A
6081361 Adams et al. Jun 2000 A
6088373 Hakki Jul 2000 A
6091743 Yang Jul 2000 A
6096496 Frankel Aug 2000 A
6104851 Mahgerefteh Aug 2000 A
6115403 Brenner et al. Sep 2000 A
6148017 Borchert et al. Nov 2000 A
6157025 Katagiri Dec 2000 A
6188499 Majima Feb 2001 B1
6222861 Kuo et al. Apr 2001 B1
6271959 Kim et al. Aug 2001 B1
6282003 Logan et al. Aug 2001 B1
6298186 He Oct 2001 B1
6331991 Mahgerefteh Dec 2001 B1
6351585 Amundson et al. Feb 2002 B1
6353623 Munks Mar 2002 B1
6359716 Taylor Mar 2002 B1
6421151 Berger Jul 2002 B1
6459518 Suzuki et al. Oct 2002 B1
6473214 Roberts et al. Oct 2002 B1
6486440 Crafts et al. Nov 2002 B1
6506342 Frankel Jan 2003 B1
6522809 Takabayashi et al. Feb 2003 B1
6563623 Penninckx et al. May 2003 B1
6577013 Glenn et al. Jun 2003 B1
6580739 Coldren Jun 2003 B1
6618513 Evankow, Jr. Sep 2003 B2
6628690 Fish et al. Sep 2003 B1
6650667 Nasu et al. Nov 2003 B2
6654564 Colbourne et al. Nov 2003 B1
6658031 Tuganov et al. Dec 2003 B2
6665351 Hedberg et al. Dec 2003 B2
6687278 Mason et al. Feb 2004 B1
6690686 Delfyett Feb 2004 B2
6738398 Hirata May 2004 B2
6748133 Liu et al. Jun 2004 B2
6778307 Clark Aug 2004 B2
6785308 Dyer et al. Aug 2004 B2
6807215 Lam et al. Oct 2004 B2
6810047 Oh et al. Oct 2004 B2
6815786 Ogasawara et al. Nov 2004 B2
6834134 Brennan et al. Dec 2004 B2
6836487 Farmer et al. Dec 2004 B1
6847758 Watanabe Jan 2005 B1
6943951 Kikuchi et al. Sep 2005 B2
6947206 Tsadka et al. Sep 2005 B2
6963685 Mahgerefteh et al. Nov 2005 B2
7013090 Adachi et al. Mar 2006 B2
7027470 May Apr 2006 B2
7054538 Mahgerefteh et al. May 2006 B2
7073956 Shin et al. Jul 2006 B1
7076170 Choa Jul 2006 B2
7123846 Tateyama et al. Oct 2006 B2
7164865 Tatsuno et al. Jan 2007 B2
7187821 Matsui et al. Mar 2007 B2
7263291 Mahgerefteh et al. Aug 2007 B2
7280721 McCallion et al. Oct 2007 B2
7352968 Tayebati Apr 2008 B2
7356264 Mahgerefteh et al. Apr 2008 B2
7376352 Tayebati May 2008 B2
7406266 Mahgerefteh et al. Jul 2008 B2
7406267 Mahgerefteh et al. Jul 2008 B2
7433605 Mahgerefteh et al. Oct 2008 B2
7474858 Lee et al. Jan 2009 B2
7474859 Mahgerefteh et al. Jan 2009 B2
7477851 Mahgerefteh et al. Jan 2009 B2
7480464 McCallion et al. Jan 2009 B2
7492976 Mahgerefteh et al. Feb 2009 B2
7502532 McCallion et al. Mar 2009 B2
7505694 Johnson et al. Mar 2009 B2
7515626 Lee et al. Apr 2009 B2
7536113 Matsui et al. May 2009 B2
7542683 Matsui et al. Jun 2009 B2
7555225 Mahgerefteh et al. Jun 2009 B2
7558488 Matsui et al. Jul 2009 B2
7564889 Matsui et al. Jul 2009 B2
7609977 Matsui et al. Oct 2009 B2
7613401 Matsui et al. Nov 2009 B2
7616902 Mahgerefteh et al. Nov 2009 B2
7630425 Tayebati et al. Dec 2009 B2
7639955 Zheng et al. Dec 2009 B2
7657179 Mahgerefteh et al. Feb 2010 B2
7663762 Mahgerefteh et al. Feb 2010 B2
7697186 McCallion et al. Apr 2010 B2
7697847 Matsui et al. Apr 2010 B2
7742542 Mahgerefteh et al. Jun 2010 B2
7760777 Matsui et al. Jul 2010 B2
7778295 Matsui et al. Aug 2010 B2
7809280 Mahgerefteh et al. Oct 2010 B2
7860404 Matsui et al. Dec 2010 B2
20010012430 Usami et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010048705 Kitoka et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020002099 Hara et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020012369 Nasu et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020025111 Koshi Feb 2002 A1
20020044738 Jablonski Apr 2002 A1
20020048290 Tanaka et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020063930 Blauvelt May 2002 A1
20020154372 Chung et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020159490 Karwacki Oct 2002 A1
20020176659 Lei et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020186730 Garbuzov Dec 2002 A1
20030002099 Sayyah et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030002120 Choa Jan 2003 A1
20030063647 Yoshida et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030067952 Tsukiji et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030077031 Zhang et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030099018 Singh et al. May 2003 A1
20030147114 Kang et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030161370 Buimovich et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030169787 Vurgaftman et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030193974 Frankel et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030210912 Leuthold Nov 2003 A1
20040008933 Mahgerefteh et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040008937 Mahgerefteh et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040036943 Freund et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040076199 Wipiejewski et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040081386 Morse et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040086012 Kitaoka et al. May 2004 A1
20040096221 Mahgerefteh et al. May 2004 A1
20040208644 Sirat et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040218890 Mahgerefteh et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040234200 Jennings et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050100345 Welch et al. May 2005 A1
20050111852 Mahgerefteh et al. May 2005 A1
20050129402 Kim et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050152702 Mahgerefteh et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050163512 Tavebati et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050169638 Tavebati et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050169642 Mahgerefteh et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050175356 McCallion et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050196177 Moran Sep 2005 A1
20050206989 Marsh Sep 2005 A1
20050213993 Kazemi-Nia et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050271394 Whiteaway et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050286829 Mahgerefteh et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050286909 Kish, Jr. et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060002718 Matsui et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060008272 Abeles et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060018666 Matsui et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060029358 Mahgerefteh et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060029396 Mahgerefteh et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060029397 Mahgerefteh et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060078338 Johnson et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060120416 Hu et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060177225 Paraschis et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060193636 Katagiri et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060228120 McCallion et al. Oct 2006 A9
20060233556 Mahgerefteh et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060239306 Donanhoe Oct 2006 A1
20060274993 Mahgerefteh et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070110453 Akiyama et al. May 2007 A1
20070286608 Matsui et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080002990 McCallion et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080037608 Zhou et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080159747 Mahgerefteh et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080166134 McCallion et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080181619 Heismann Jul 2008 A1
20080187325 McCallion et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080193132 Matsui et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080193143 Mahgerefteh et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080193144 Zhou et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080240180 Matsui et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080247763 Mahgerefteh et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080247765 Mahgerefteh et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080291950 McCallion et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090003842 Mahgerefteh et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090060526 Matsui et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090080905 Olsson Mar 2009 A1
20090196631 Daghighian et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090238224 Ye Sep 2009 A1
20100008679 Cole Jan 2010 A1
20100098436 Mahgerefteh et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100254420 Corzine et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100279447 Matsui et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100311195 Matsui et al. Dec 2010 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (22)
Number Date Country
1236891 Dec 1999 CN
0524758 Jul 1992 EP
602659 Jun 1994 EP
2 107 147 Apr 1983 GB
58-075340 May 1983 JP
62-189832 Aug 1987 JP
09-214427 Aug 1997 JP
11-031859 Feb 1999 JP
2000105313 Apr 2000 JP
2001-036477 Feb 2001 JP
2001-284711 Oct 2001 JP
2001291928 Oct 2001 JP
2001320328 Nov 2001 JP
2002243935 Aug 2002 JP
2002267834 Sep 2002 JP
2002267998 Sep 2002 JP
2002-311235 Oct 2002 JP
9905804 Feb 1999 WO
0104999 Jan 2001 WO
0117076 Mar 2001 WO
0118919 Mar 2001 WO
03005512 Jan 2003 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20090269069 A1 Oct 2009 US