1. The Field of the Invention
This application relates to fiber optic transmitters, and, more particularly to wave division multiplexed (WDM) transmitters.
2. The Relevant Technology
One means for increasing the capacity of a fiber optic network is to use wave division multiplexing (WDM) wherein optical signals having different wavelengths are transmitted simultaneously through the fiber. For example, the industry standard for the transmitter optical sub-assembly (TOSA) for 100 Gb/s Ethernet is expected to include wavelength division multiplexing of 4 transmitters at 25 Gb/s.
One proposed transmitter implementing this standard includes a co-package of an array of externally modulated lasers (EML), such as a monolithically integrated DFB laser and external electro-absorption modulator, a wave division multiplexer (WDM), an array of photodiodes, and output fiber coupling assembly. Other proposed transmitters include a directly modulated arrayed distributed feedback (DFB) laser.
Externally modulated lasers have the significant disadvantage of being bulky due to the requirement of both a laser and an external modulator. They further require more power inasmuch as both the laser and external modulator are powered. They also require a high degree of integration, which makes them difficult to manufacture with high yields. EML have been demonstrated at 40 Gb/s with extinction ratio>=10 dB and dispersion tolerance of ˜40 ps/nm (Okayasu, M. et al, A 1550-nm 40-Gbit/s electro-absorption DFB laser diode module for transponders with very short reach (<2 km) applications, LEOS 2004, page: 513-514).
Directly modulated multi-wavelength integrated DFB laser arrays have been deployed widely as wavelength selective laser source, but the extinction ratio (ER) of most directly modulated lasers is less than 7 dB, which is less than the required ER for most applications. The highest ER reported for 40 Gb/s direct modulated DFB laser is 5 dB, Nakahara K., et al, “40-Gb/s direct modulation with high extinction ratio operation of 1.3-um InGaAlAs multiquantum well ridge waveguide distributed feedback lasers,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, Vol. 19, October, 2007, pp. 1436-1438. Other directly modulated lasers provide better extinction ratios, however WDM system incorporating such lasers have not been demonstrated.
In view of the foregoing it would be an advancement in the art to provide a compact WDM transmitter using a directly modulated laser array that further provides an extinction ratio at least as high as 7 dB. It would be a further advancement in the art to provide such a transmitter that was readily manufacturable.
In one aspect of the invention, an optical transmitter includes a laser array comprising a plurality of lasers each tuned to a unique frequency. A planar lightwave chip (PLC) abuts the laser array and includes a plurality of optical spectrum reshapers (OSRs) each positioned to receive light from one of the plurality of lasers and configured to enhance an extinction ratio of the received light. An optical multiplexer is optically coupled to each of the plurality of OSRs and has an output proximate a first edge of the PLC. The optical multiplexer has transmission peaks having a 0.5 dB bandwidth including the corresponding frequency of one of the plurality of lasers of the laser array.
In another aspect of the invention, the optical multiplexer has transmission peaks having a 0.5 dB bandwidth equal to between 25 and 45 percent, preferably at least 40 percent, of the separation between the transmission peaks.
In another aspect of the invention, each of the plurality of OSRs is adapted to transmit a portion of light received from the lasers of the laser array and to reject a portion. A first plurality of waveguides transmit at least a portion of the transmitted light to a second edge of the PLC and a second plurality of waveguides transmit at least a portion of the rejected light to a third edge of the PLC. A first array of photodetectors detect light from the first plurality of waveguides and a second array of photodetectors detect light from the second plurality of waveguides. A controller receives outputs from the first and second arrays of photodetectors and controls index of refraction adjusting elements coupled to each of the OSRs according to a ratio of the outputs at a predetermined ratio.
In another aspect of the invention the multiplexer is embodied as cascaded Mach-Zehnder interferometers or ring resonators.
These and other objects and features of the present invention will become more fully apparent from the following description and appended claims, or may be learned by the practice of the invention as set forth hereinafter.
To further clarify the above and other advantages and features of the present invention, a more particular description of the invention will be rendered by reference to specific embodiments thereof which are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is appreciated that these drawings depict only typical embodiments of the invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope. The invention will be described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings in which:
Referring to
In a preferred embodiment, each laser 14a-14d has a nominal wavelength differing from each of the other lasers 14a-14d by an integer multiple of a wavelength difference Δλ. However, the wavelengths of the lasers 14a-14d may vary due to manufacturing limitations and may be independently tunable away from their nominal wavelengths such that the difference in wavelength between adjacent lasers 14a-14d is not necessarily equal to Δλ. In the illustrated embodiment, lasers 14a-14d have nominal wavelengths of λ1, λ1+Δλ, λ1+2Δλ, and λ1+3Δλ, respectively. In a preferred embodiment, the wavelengths of the lasers 14a-14d differ from their nominal wavelengths by no more than 20% of Δλ, more preferably by less than 10% of Δλ.
The relationship between amplitude modulation, frequency modulation and modulation current supplied to the lasers 14a-14d can be expressed by following rate equations (Sato K., et al, Chirp characteristics of 40-Gb/s directly modulated distributed-feedback laser diodes, Journal of lightwave technology, vol. 23, November 2005, pp. 3790-3797):
in which N is the carrier density, q is the electric charge of an electron, V is the volume of the active region, I is the injection current, τe is the lifetime of the carrier, vg is the group velocity of light, g is the gain, S is the photon number density in the cavity, Γ is the optical confinement factor, Rsp is the rate of spontaneous emission, N0 is the transparency carrier density, a is the differential gain coefficient, ε is the gain compression factor, Δν, which is also called chirp, is the deviation of laser frequency from the laser frequency at threshold, Nth is the carrier density at threshold current, and α is the line-width enhancement factor. (Sato K., et al, Chirp characteristics of 40-Gb/s directly modulated distributed-feedback laser diodes, Journal of lightwave technology, vol. 23, November 2005, pp. 3790-3797):
For a modulation current from 72 mA to 112 mA, for example, the light photon density changes from 4.3×1021 to 7.1×1021, which correspond to an extinction ratio of 2.2 dB. At the same time, the chirp of the laser is ˜12.8 GHz. The required chirp is about half of the bit rate, for example, for 25 Gb/s, the required chirp is ˜12.5 GHz. The size of the chirp can be adjusted by adjusting the modulation current amplitude. The output electrical field of laser can be expressed as follows:
The laser array 12 is coupled to a planar lightwave circuit (PLC) 16 including a plurality of optical spectrum reshapers (OSR) 18a-18d and a wave division multiplexer (WDM) 18. In a preferred embodiment the laser array 12 is butt coupled to the PLC 16, however other coupling mechanisms are possible. The WDM 20 receives signals from the OSRs 18a-18d and multiplexes the signals onto an output fiber 22 using coupling optics 24. In the illustrated embodiment, the laser array 12 couples to one side of the PLC 16 and the coupling optics are coupled to the opposite side of the PLC 16. The illustrated combination of laser array 12 and PLC 16 provides the distinct advantage over the prior art of not requiring a high degree of integration for the laser array 12. The laser array 12 does not require an external modulator as in other WDM transmitters. Furthermore, the OSRs 18a-18d and WDM 20 are passive elements that are readily combined in a single component.
Each OSR 18a-18d receives optical signals from one of the lasers 14a-14d. Each OSR 18a-18d has a transmission edge corresponding to the frequency of the laser 14a-14d from which it receives signals. In some embodiments, the lasers 14a-14d are directly modulated to generate a frequency modulated signal encoding a data signal. In such embodiments, the frequency modulated signal includes frequency excursions between a base and a peak frequency. In a preferred embodiment, a transmission edge of each OSR 18a-18d either includes one or both of the peak and base frequency or lies between the peak and base frequency of the laser 14a-14d from which it receives signals. Each laser-OSR pairing may be embodied as the laser transmitters disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/272,100, filed Nov. 8, 2005 by Daniel Mahgerefteh et al. for POWER SOURCE FOR A DISPERSION COMPENSATION FIBER OPTIC SYSTEM.
The use of OSRs 18a-18d enables the extinction ratio of the light emitted from the lasers 14a-14d to be improved from 1.5 dB before the OSR 18a-18d to 10 dB after the OSR 18. (Matsui Y., et al, Chirp-managed directly modulated laser (CML), IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, Vol. 18, No. 2, January, 2006, pp 385-pp 387).
Referring to
A tuning element 32 is coupled to each interferometer 26 in order to alter the optical path length of one or both of the paths 28, 30 to enable alignment of the transmission edge of the interferometer 26 with respect to the wavelength of one of the lasers 14a-14d. The quality of the signal output from the interferometers 26 depends on the frequency detune between a zero-level signal frequency of the frequency modulated output of the lasers 14a-14d and the transmission peak frequency of the interferometer 26. For an input signal having an extinction ratio of ˜2 dB, an ER of greater than 10 dB may be achieved after the interferometers 26 with a frequency detune of between 20 and 25 GHz.
The tuning element 32 may alter the optical path length of one or both of the first and second paths 28, 30 by means of the thermo-optic effect, electro-optic effect, or some other mechanism. In a preferred embodiment, each tuning element 32 is a thermoelectric cooler positioned over one of the interferometers 26. In an alternative embodiment, the tuning elements 32 are positioned over the lasers 14a-14d for tuning the wavelengths of the lasers relative to the OSRs 18a-18d
The first path 28 has one end positioned to receive light from one of the lasers 14a-14d. The first and second paths 28, 30 further define two output ports 34, 36, respectively, referred to as the bar-port 34 and X-port 36. In the time domain, the output of the Mach-Zehnder interferometer is expressed as in following equations:
where t is time, Ein is the input intensity, n1 and n2 are the indexes of refraction for the first and second paths 28, 30, and L1 and L2 are the lengths of the first and second paths 28, 30.
The port 34 of each of the interferometers 26 is coupled to a waveguide 38 transmitting light to the WDM 20. Waveguides 40 are coupled to the waveguide 38 and transmit a fraction, preferably five percent or less, of the light transmitted from port 34 to one edge of the PLC 16. A photodiode array 42 is positioned at the edge of the PLC 16 and includes photodiodes that each receives light from one of the waveguides 38. The ports 36 are coupled to waveguides 44 transmitting light to one edge of the PLC 16. A photodiode array 46 includes photodiodes each positioned to receive light from one of the waveguides 44. In the illustrated embodiment, the photodiode array 42 and 46 are positioned on opposite sides of the PLC 16 and are positioned on faces perpendicular to the face abutting the laser array 12.
The outputs of the photodiode arrays 42, 46 represent light that is transmitted and rejected, respectively, by the interferometers. A driving circuit may be coupled to the photodiode arrays 42, 46 and to the tuning elements 32. The driving circuit may adjust the optical path lengths of one or both of the paths 28, 30 using the tuning elements 32 such that the ratio of the outputs of the photodiode arrays 42, 46 is maintained at a predetermined value, which effectively maintains the position of the transmission edges of the interferometers 26 in a predetermined relationship to the wavelengths of the lasers 14a-14d.
The ratio which gives the best output waveform can be calibrated at the beginning of the life of the laser transmitter 10. For a silicon waveguide, the thermal refractive index coefficient is ˜1.8×10−4/° C., for a 1.7 mm waveguide. A temperature change of about 5° C. is therefore required to shift the frequency detune of 1 free spectral range (FSR) at 1.55 μm wavelength, or 4° C., to shift the frequency detune of 1 FSR at 1.3 μm wavelength.
In the illustrated embodiment, the WDM 20 is embodied as cascading Mach-Zehnder interferometers. Other implementations are also possible, such as an etched grating or arrayed waveguide grating. A first stage 48 preferably includes one half of the number Mach-Zehnder interferometers as there are lasers 14a-14d or OSRs 18a-18d. Each interferometer 50a, 50b of the first stage include a first input port 52, a second input port 54, and at least one output port 56. The transmission function for the input ports 52, 54 is shown in
For the illustrated embodiment, the input ports 52, 54 of interferometer 50a are coupled to the OSRs 18a, 18c corresponding to the lasers 14a, 14c emitting at the wavelengths λ1 and λ1+2Δλ, respectively. The input ports 52, 54 of interferometer 50b are coupled to the OSRs 18b, 18d coupled to the lasers 14b, 14d emitting at the wavelengths of λ1+Δλ and λ1+3Δλ, respectively. The interferometers 50a, 50b of the first stage have a FSR of 4Δλ and have transmission peaks aligned with the wavelength of the laser from which they receive light.
The output ports 56 of the interferometers 50a, 50b are coupled to input ports 62 and 64, respectively, of one or more interferometers 66 of a second stage 68. The one or more interferometers 66 of the second stage preferably have a FSR equal one half that of the interferometers 50a, 50b of the first stage such that transmission peaks in the second stage 68 are aligned with all of the transmission peaks of the first stage 48.
In the illustrated embodiment, the interferometer 66 of the output stage has input port 62 coupled to the output port 56 of the interferometer 50a and input port 64 coupled to the output port 56 of the interferometer 50b. The interferometer 66 has a FSR of 2Δλ and has transmission peaks through input port 62 at λ1 and λ1+2Δλ and through input port 64 at λ1+Δλ and λ1+3Δλ. The combined first and second stages 48, 58 are therefore able to multiplex the wavelengths of all four lasers 14a-14d onto a single output port 70 of the interferometer 66. The output port 70 is coupled to coupling optics 24 in order to transmit the multiplexed signals over the fiber 22.
Stated generically, a laser array 12 having N lasers L0 . . . Lb . . . LN−1 having a wavelength spacing of Δλ may be coupled to a WDM 20 having log2N stages S0 . . . Sk . . . Slog
The input ports Pr,1 and Pr,2 of each interferometer Ir in the first stage S0 are positioned to receive light from the OSRs that receive light from lasers Lr and Lr+N/2
Referring to
The ring resonator filter 76 includes a first waveguide 84, a second waveguide 86, and a ring resonator 88. The ring resonator 88 is coupled to the first waveguide 84 by a first coupler k1 and is coupled to the second waveguide 86 by means of a second coupler k2. The first waveguide is coupled to the input 78 and bar-port 80. The second waveguide 86 is coupled to the X-port 82. The transmission of the bar-port 80 and X-port 82 is described by equation 8 and 9:
in which, kL1 is the coupling efficiency of coupler k1, kL2 is the coupling efficiency of coupler k2, nL is the optical path delay of the ring 88, and ν is the optical frequency of the input field.
The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is, therefore, indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description. All changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3324295 | Harris | Jun 1967 | A |
3973216 | Hughes et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
3999105 | Archey et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4038600 | Thomas et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4561119 | Epworth | Dec 1985 | A |
4671604 | Soref | Jun 1987 | A |
4754459 | Westbrook | Jun 1988 | A |
4805235 | Henmi | Feb 1989 | A |
4841519 | Nishio | Jun 1989 | A |
4896325 | Coldren | Jan 1990 | A |
4908833 | Chraplyvy et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4914667 | Blonder et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
5088097 | Ono et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5119393 | Oka et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5136598 | Weller et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5170402 | Ogita et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5177630 | Goutzoulis et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5293545 | Huber | Mar 1994 | A |
5325378 | Zorabedian | Jun 1994 | A |
5325382 | Emura et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5371625 | Wedding et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5373383 | LaGasse | Dec 1994 | A |
5394429 | Yamada et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5412474 | Reasenberg et al. | May 1995 | A |
5416629 | Huber | May 1995 | A |
5434693 | Tanaka et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5450432 | Okuda | Sep 1995 | A |
5459799 | Weber | Oct 1995 | A |
5465264 | Buhler et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5477368 | Eskildsen et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5550667 | Krimmel et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5568311 | Matsumoto | Oct 1996 | A |
5592327 | Gabl et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5642371 | Tohyama et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5696859 | Onaka et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5737104 | Lee et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5777773 | Epworth et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5805235 | Bedard | Sep 1998 | A |
5856980 | Doyle | Jan 1999 | A |
5920416 | Beylat et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5946129 | Xu et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5953139 | Nemecek et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5953361 | Borchert | Sep 1999 | A |
5974209 | Cho et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6018275 | Perrett et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6081361 | Adams et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6088373 | Hakki | Jul 2000 | A |
6091743 | Yang | Jul 2000 | A |
6096496 | Frankel | Aug 2000 | A |
6104851 | Mahgerefteh | Aug 2000 | A |
6115403 | Brenner et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6148017 | Borchert et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157025 | Katagiri | Dec 2000 | A |
6188499 | Majima | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6222861 | Kuo et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6271959 | Kim et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282003 | Logan et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6298186 | He | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6331991 | Mahgerefteh | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6351585 | Amundson et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6353623 | Munks | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6359716 | Taylor | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6421151 | Berger | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6459518 | Suzuki et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473214 | Roberts et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6486440 | Crafts et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6506342 | Frankel | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6522809 | Takabayashi et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6563623 | Penninckx et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6577013 | Glenn et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6580739 | Coldren | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6618513 | Evankow, Jr. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6628690 | Fish et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6650667 | Nasu et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6654564 | Colbourne et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6658031 | Tuganov et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6665351 | Hedberg et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6687278 | Mason et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6690686 | Delfyett | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6738398 | Hirata | May 2004 | B2 |
6748133 | Liu et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6778307 | Clark | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6785308 | Dyer et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6807215 | Lam et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6810047 | Oh et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6815786 | Ogasawara et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6834134 | Brennan et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6836487 | Farmer et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6847758 | Watanabe | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6943951 | Kikuchi et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6947206 | Tsadka et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6963685 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7013090 | Adachi et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7027470 | May | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7054538 | Mahgerefteh et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7073956 | Shin et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7076170 | Choa | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7123846 | Tateyama et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7164865 | Tatsuno et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7187821 | Matsui et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7263291 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7280721 | McCallion et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7352968 | Tayebati | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7356264 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7376352 | Tayebati | May 2008 | B2 |
7406266 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7406267 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7433605 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7474858 | Lee et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7474859 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7477851 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7480464 | McCallion et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7492976 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7502532 | McCallion et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7505694 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7515626 | Lee et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7536113 | Matsui et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7542683 | Matsui et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7555225 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7558488 | Matsui et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7564889 | Matsui et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7609977 | Matsui et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7613401 | Matsui et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7616902 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7630425 | Tayebati et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7639955 | Zheng et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7657179 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7663762 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7697186 | McCallion et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7697847 | Matsui et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7742542 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7760777 | Matsui et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7778295 | Matsui et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7809280 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7860404 | Matsui et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
20010012430 | Usami et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010048705 | Kitoka et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020002099 | Hara et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020012369 | Nasu et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020025111 | Koshi | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020044738 | Jablonski | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020048290 | Tanaka et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020063930 | Blauvelt | May 2002 | A1 |
20020154372 | Chung et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020159490 | Karwacki | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020176659 | Lei et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020186730 | Garbuzov | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030002099 | Sayyah et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030002120 | Choa | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030063647 | Yoshida et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030067952 | Tsukiji et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030077031 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030099018 | Singh et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030147114 | Kang et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030161370 | Buimovich et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030169787 | Vurgaftman et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030193974 | Frankel et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030210912 | Leuthold | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040008933 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040008937 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040036943 | Freund et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040076199 | Wipiejewski et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040081386 | Morse et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040086012 | Kitaoka et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040096221 | Mahgerefteh et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040208644 | Sirat et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040218890 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040234200 | Jennings et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050100345 | Welch et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050111852 | Mahgerefteh et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050129402 | Kim et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050152702 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050163512 | Tavebati et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050169638 | Tavebati et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050169642 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050175356 | McCallion et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050196177 | Moran | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050206989 | Marsh | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213993 | Kazemi-Nia et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050271394 | Whiteaway et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050286829 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050286909 | Kish, Jr. et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060002718 | Matsui et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060008272 | Abeles et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060018666 | Matsui et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060029358 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060029396 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060029397 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060078338 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060120416 | Hu et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060177225 | Paraschis et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060193636 | Katagiri et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060228120 | McCallion et al. | Oct 2006 | A9 |
20060233556 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060239306 | Donanhoe | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060274993 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070110453 | Akiyama et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070286608 | Matsui et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080002990 | McCallion et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080037608 | Zhou et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080159747 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080166134 | McCallion et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080181619 | Heismann | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080187325 | McCallion et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080193132 | Matsui et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080193143 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080193144 | Zhou et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080240180 | Matsui et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080247763 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080247765 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080291950 | McCallion et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090003842 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090060526 | Matsui et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090080905 | Olsson | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090196631 | Daghighian et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090238224 | Ye | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100008679 | Cole | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100098436 | Mahgerefteh et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100254420 | Corzine et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100279447 | Matsui et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100311195 | Matsui et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1236891 | Dec 1999 | CN |
0524758 | Jul 1992 | EP |
602659 | Jun 1994 | EP |
2 107 147 | Apr 1983 | GB |
58-075340 | May 1983 | JP |
62-189832 | Aug 1987 | JP |
09-214427 | Aug 1997 | JP |
11-031859 | Feb 1999 | JP |
2000105313 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2001-036477 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001-284711 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2001291928 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2001320328 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2002243935 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002267834 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2002267998 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2002-311235 | Oct 2002 | JP |
9905804 | Feb 1999 | WO |
0104999 | Jan 2001 | WO |
0117076 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0118919 | Mar 2001 | WO |
03005512 | Jan 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090269069 A1 | Oct 2009 | US |