The present invention relates generally to a system and method for detecting airborne or waterborne particles, and more particularly to a system and method for detecting airborne or waterborne particles and classifying the detected particles. The invention has particular utility in detecting and classifying allergens and biological warfare agent, and will be described in connection with such utility, although other utilities are contemplated.
An urban terrorist attack involving release of biological warfare agents such as bacillus anthracis (anthrax) is presently a realistic concern. Weaponized anthrax spores are extremely dangerous because they can gain passage into the human lungs. A lethal inhalation dose of anthrax spores for humans, LD50 (lethal dose sufficient to kill 50% of the persons exposed) is estimated to be 2,500 to 50,000 spores (see T. V. Inglesby, et al., “anthrax as a Biological Weapon”, JAMA, vol. 2801, page 1735, 1999). Some other potential weaponized bio-agents are yersinia pestis (plaque), clostridium botulinum (botulism), and francisella tularensis. In view of this potential threat, there is currently a need for an early warning system to detect such an attack. In the pharmaceutical, healthcare and food industries, a real time detector of environmental microbial level is useful for public health, quality control and regulatory purposes. For example, parental drug manufacturers are required to monitor the microbial levels in their aseptic clean rooms. In these applications, an instrument which can detect microbes in the environment instantaneously will be a useful tool and have advantages over conventional nutrient plate culture methods which requires days for microbes to grow and to be detected.
Particle size measurement and ultraviolet (UV) induced fluorescence detection have been used to detect the presence of biological substances in the air. There exist various patents describing using these techniques as early warning sensors for bio-terrorist attack release of weaponized bio-agents. Among these devices are Biological Agent Warning Sensor (BAWS) developed by MIT Lincoln Laboratory, fluorescence biological particle detection system of Ho (Jim yew-Wah Ho, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,701,012; 5,895,922; 6,831,279); FLAPS and UV-APS by TSI of Minnesota (Peter P. Hairston; and Frederick R. Quant; U.S. Pat. No. 5,999,250), and a fluorescence sensor by Silcott (U.S. Pat. No. 6,885,440).
A proposed bio-sensor based on laser-induced fluorescence using a pulsed UV laser is described by T. H. Jeys, et al., Proc. IRIS Active Systems, vol. 1, p.235, 1998. This is capable of detecting an aerosol concentration of five particles per liter of air, but involves expensive and delicate instruments. Other particle counters are manufactured by Met One Instrument, Inc, of Grants Pass, Oreg., Particle Measurement Systems, Inc., of Boulder, Colo., and Terra Universal Corp., of Anaheim, Calif.
Various detectors have been designed to detect airborne allergen particles and provide warning to sensitive individuals when the number of particles within an air sample exceeds a predetermined minimum value. These are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,646,597, 5,969,622, 5,986,555, 6,008,729, 6,087,947, and 7,053,783, all to Hamburger et al. These detectors all involve direction of a light beam through a sample of environmental air such that part of the beam will be scattered by any particles in the air, a beam blocking device for transmitting only light scattered in a predetermined angular range corresponding to the predetermined allergen size range, and a detector for detecting the transmitted light.
For the purpose of detection of microbes in air or water, it is of importance to devise an effective system to measure both particle size and fluorescence generated intrinsically by the microbes. The present invention provides a sensor system which is capable of simultaneously measuring particle size and detecting the presence of intrinsic fluorescence from metabolites and other bio-molecules, on a particle-by-particle basis. The advantages of this detection scheme over the prior art are several. For one it provides a deterministic particle measurement methodology for characterizing particles rather than relying on statistical models employed in prior art for particle characterization. The deterministic measurement methodology enables more definitive assignment of particle characters than the prior art and less reliance on statistical models. It also reduces the possibility of false positives in microbial detection, for example, pollen (larger sizes than microbes) and smoke particles (smaller sizes than microbes) can be excluded from detection. And, it allows detailed analyses of data collected on each individual particle for characterizing the particle, such as intensity of fluorescence signal from a particle as a function of its cross-sectional area or volume, for the purpose of determining the biological status of the particles.
The current invention comprises three main components: (1) a first optical system for measuring an individual particle size; (2) a second optical system to detect a UV laser-induced intrinsic fluorescence signal from an individual particle; and (3) a data recording format for assigning both particle size and fluorescence shy to an individual particle, and computer readable program code for differentiating microbes from non-microbes (e.g. inert dust particles).
The optical assembly of the present invention has two optical sub-assemblies: (a) an optical setup to measure the particle size. As an example, the preferred embodiment of the current invention uses the well-known and often used Mie scattering detection scheme, but applies it in a novel way, enabling the system to make highly accurate measurements of airborne particles with size ranges from 0.5 microns to 20 microns. This capability to make fine distinctions in size is important in order to determine the class of microbe, because different classes of microbes have different size ranges; (b) simultaneous to the particle size measurement, an optical apparatus is used to measure the fluorescence level from the particle being interrogated. As an example, the preferred embodiment of the current invention uses an elliptical minor which is positioned to collected fluorescence emission from the same particle as it is being measured for size.
Further features and advantages of the present invention will be seen from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
a) is a histogram representation of simultaneous measurements of particle size and fluorescence showing particle distribution for microbe-free air;
b) is a histogram showing simultaneous measurements of particle size and fluorescence for air containing Baker's yeast powder;
The term “fluid borne particles” as used herein means both airborne particles and waterborne particles.
The term “pathogen” as used herein refers to any airborne or waterborne particles, biological agent, or toxin, which could potentially harm or even kill humans exposed to such particles if present in the air or water in sufficient quantities.
The term “biological agent” is defined as any microorganism, pathogen, or infectious substance, toxin, biological toxin, or any naturally occurring, bioengineered or synthesized component of any such microorganism, pathogen, or infectious substance, whatever As origin or method of production. Such biological agents include, for example, biological toxins, bacteria, viruses, rickettsiae, spores, fungi, and protozoa, as well as others known in the art.
“Biological toxins” are poisonous substances produced or derived from plants, animals or microorganisms, but also can be produced or altered by chemical means. A toxin, however, generally develops naturally in a host organism (i.e., saxitoxin is produced by marine algae), but genetically altered and/or synthetically manufactured toxins have been produced in a laboratory environment. Compared with microorganisms, toxins have a relatively simple biochemical composition and are not able to reproduce themselves. In many aspects, they are comparable to chemical agents. Such biological toxins are, for example, botulinum and tetanus toxins, staphylococcal enterotoxin B, tricothocene mycotoxins, ricin, saxitoxin, Shiga and Shiga-like toxins, dendrotoxins, erabutoxin b, as well as other known toxins.
The detector system of the present invention is designed to detect airborne or waterborne particles and produce outputs indicating, for instance, the number of particles of each size within the range, which is detected in a sample, and indicate whether the particles are biologic or non-biologic. The system also may produce an signal or other response if the number of particles exceeds a predetermined value above a normal background level, and/or biological organisms or biological agents and potentially dangerous.
In the system 10 illustrated in
Off axis from the laser beam 14, an elliptical mirror 30 is placed at the particle-sampling region in such a way that the intersection of the incoming particle stream and the laser beam is at one of the two foci of the ellipsoid, while a fluorescence detector 32 (in this case a photo-multiplier tube) occupies the other focus. This design utilizes the fact that a point source of light emanating from one of the two foci of an ellipsoid will be focused onto the other. In this optical design, the elliptical mirror 30 concentrates the fluorescence signal from microbe and focus it onto the fluorescence detector 32. An optical filter 34 is placed in front of the fluorescence detector to block the scattered UV light and pass the induced fluorescence.
The beam blocker lens 22 is designed to reflect non-scattered elements of the laser beam 14, and may have a material, such as vinyl, attached a front surface to reflect the non-scattered elements of the beam of electromagnetic radiation. Other features and considerations for the beam blocker lens 22 are disclosed in some of the earlier US patents to Hamburger et al. listed above, and in PCT Application Serial No. PCT/US2006027638, incorporated herein by reference.
The particle detector 20 may comprise, for example, a photodiode for sizing the particles, e.g. as described in the earlier US patent to Hamburger et al., listed above, and incorporated herein by reference The present invention's use of Mie scattering also facilitates the placement of optical components for the detection of UV light illumination to concurrently examine individual particles for the presence of the metabolites NADH, riboflavin and other bio-molecules, which are necessary intermediates for metabolism of living organisms, and therefore exist in microbes such as bacteria and fungi. If these chemical compounds exist in a bio-aerosol, they are excited by the UV photon energy and subsequently emit auto-fluorescence light which may be detected by an instrument based on the detection scheme outlined above. While this detection scheme is not capable of identifying the genus or species of microbes, and viruses may be too small and lack the metabolism for detection, this detection scheme's ability to simultaneously and for each particle determine the size of the particle and if it is biologic or inert indicates to the user the presence Or absence of microbial contamination.
Referring to
It should be emphasized that the above-described embodiments of the present invention, particularly, any “preferred” embodiments, are merely possible examples of implementations, merely set forth for a clear understanding of the principles of the invention. Many variations and modifications may be made to the above-described embodiments of the invention without departing substantially from the spirit and principles of the invention. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of this disclosure and the present invention and, protected by the following claims.
This application is a divisional of U.S. Non-Provisional Application having Ser. No. 11/768,103, filed on Jun. 25, 2007, now abandoned which in turn claims priority to U.S. provisional application having Ser. No. 60/805,962, filed on Jun. 27, 2006. The contents these applications are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety, for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3497690 | Wheeless et al. | Feb 1970 | A |
3850525 | Kaye | Nov 1974 | A |
4071298 | Falconer | Jan 1978 | A |
5123731 | Yoshinaga et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5290707 | Wood | Mar 1994 | A |
5292483 | Kaye | Mar 1994 | A |
5540494 | Purvis, Jr. et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5646597 | Hamburger et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5701012 | Ho | Dec 1997 | A |
5895922 | Ho | Apr 1999 | A |
5969622 | Hamburger et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5986555 | Hamburger et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999250 | Hairston et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6008729 | Hamburger et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6087947 | Hamburger et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6404493 | Altendorf | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6592822 | Chandler | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6787104 | Mariella, Jr. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6831279 | Ho | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6885440 | Silcott et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7053783 | Hamburger et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7126687 | Hill et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7430046 | Jiang et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7738099 | Morrell et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
20020045190 | Wilson, Jr. et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20030098422 | Silcott et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030235919 | Chandler | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040159799 | Saccomanno | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050221497 | Young | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050282219 | Prober et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060071075 | Moon et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2420616 | May 2006 | GB |
WO 2005029046 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO2005029046 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO2005033283 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO2007011854 | Jan 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
BioVigilant White Paper, “Instantaneous Microbial Detection” Jan. 2005. p. 1-6. [http://www.biovigilant.com/PDFs/IMD%20for%20Pharmamaceutical%20MFG%2005-05-08.pdf]. |
T.H. Jeyes et al., Proc. IRIS Active Systems, vol. 1, p. 235, 1998. |
T.V. Inglesby et al., “Anthrax as a Biological Weapon”, JAMA, vol. 281, p. 1735, 1999. |
Brosseau et al., “Differences in Detected Fluorescence Among Several Bacterial Species Measured with a Direct-Reading Particle Sizer and Fluorescence Detector”, Aerosol Science and Technology, 32:545-558, 2000, Taylor and Francis. |
Agranovski et al., “Real-time measurement of bacterial aerosols with the UVAPS: performance evaluation”, J. Aerosol Sci., 34(3):301-317, 2003, Elsevier. |
Kanaani et al., “Performance of UVAPS with respect to detection of airborne fungi”, J. Aerosol Sci., 39, pp. 175-189, 2008, Elsevier. |
Hairston et al., “Design of an Instrument for Real-Time Detection of Bioaerosols Using Simultaneous Measurement of Particle Aerodynamic Size and Intrinsic Fluorescence,” Journal of Aerosol Science, 1997, vol. 28, No. 3, p. 471-482. |
Weichert et al., “Determination of Fluorescence Cross-Sections of Biological Aerosols,” Particle & Particle Systems Characterization, Jul. 1, 2002, vol. 19, Issue 3, p. 216-222. |
“Instantaneous Microbial Detection,” BioVigilant White Paper, Jan. 1, 2005, p. 1-6, XP55002158. |
“Why Simultaneous Sizing and Fluorescence is Necessary in Order to do Microbial Detection”, BioVigilant White Paper, Jan. 1, 2005, XP55002196. |
PCT/US2007/072050 International Preliminary Report on Patentability. |
PCT/US2008/086886 International Search Report and Written Opinion. |
PCT/US2008/083052 International Search Report and Written Opinion. |
Office Action received in corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 200780024666.9. |
Chinese Office Action dated Aug. 23, 2011. |
Chinese Office Action dated Mar. 23, 2012. |
Japanese Patent Office dated Mar. 16, 2012. |
EP Supplementary European Search Report. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120307234 A1 | Dec 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60805962 | Jun 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11768103 | Jun 2007 | US |
Child | 13584685 | US |