The present application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/166,892, which was filed Jul. 2, 2008, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,712,167 on May 11, 2010, and which claimed priority, under 35 U.S.C. ยง119(a), of French National Application No. 07 56317 which was filed Jul. 6, 2007 and which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
The present disclosure relates to a bed having a retractable side barrier, in particular a bed for a patient; the disclosure relates more particularly to an apparatus for enabling the height of the protection provided by said barrier to be increased, other things remaining equal.
A patient bed is known that is fitted with a side barrier mounted along a bedstead or frame of the bed. To give access to the bed in order to provide care, it is known to combine such a barrier with a deformable parallelogram mechanism having two pivot arms connected to the stationary frame of the bed or to an equivalent structure. Under such conditions, the barrier can be lowered or raised, substantially parallel to itself, the movement being accompanied by a movement in translation and rotation parallel to the longitudinal direction of the bed. In such a mechanism, it is desirable to increase the distance between the top bar of the barrier in the raised position and the bedding plane. Nevertheless, in this position, the bottom edge of the barrier should not be situated too high.
Furthermore, in the low position, the bottom edge of the barrier should be at a sufficient distance from the floor. These requirements are specified by a standard. Taking all of these constraints into account would lead to the height of the bedding plane to be raised in order to be able to associate a higher barrier with the bed. That is not desirable since said bedding plane needs to be relatively low in order to reduce the risk of injury if a patient falls out of bed, and in order to make it easier to move the patient out from the bed or to put the patient into the bed.
From a mechanical point of view, it is known to associate the deformable parallelogram mechanism with a bottom bar that is hinged to the two arms via its two ends. This bar is referred to herein as a deployment bar and it serves to make the movements of the mechanism more reliable by avoiding jamming. Conventionally, the bar is installed in a box that is fixed under the frame of the bed and that occupies a relatively large volume.
Document EP 1 053 735 describes a barrier that is hinged in its own plane and that comprises two portions, a bottom portion and a top portion that are approximately L-shaped. The dynamics of the deployment system are such that the two portions are further apart from each other when the barrier is in its high position than when it is in its low position. The space between the two portions can give rise to an accident. In addition, when the barrier is in its low position, it occupies a relatively large amount of space longitudinally.
The devices disclosed herein seek to reconcile all of the above-mentioned requirements while avoiding the above-analyzed drawbacks of the prior art device.
Disclosed herein is a bed with a retractable side barrier of the type comprising a main barrier element associated with a deformable parallelogram mechanism hinged to a frame of the bed or to an analogous structure, said mechanism comprising two parallel arms, each including a hinge to said frame and a hinge to said main barrier element, a deployment bar being additionally hinged between said arms, wherein said mechanism is associated with a bottom extender attached to said deployment bar by a sliding connection, and wherein said extender is constrained to slide along vertical guide means carried by said main barrier elements.
By way of example, said extender may be carried by two pins each secured to the deployment bar, each pin being engaged in a respective slot of the extender. The arrangement could naturally be inverted.
Locking means (that do not form part of the invention and that are not described in detail below) are provided in order to define high and low stable positions, and possibly also an intermediate stable position for the main barrier elements, and consequently also for the extender, which in one possible embodiment can be deployed downwards when the main barrier element is in its high position, and on the contrary retracted into the main barrier element when the barrier element is in its low position.
The devices disclosed herein can be better understood on reading the following description of side-barrier beds in accordance with this disclosure, given purely by way of example, and made with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
In the drawings, there can be seen a diagram showing part of a bed 11 comprising a bedstead or frame 12 that is stationary and that supports a bedding plane having a mattress 14 placed thereon. A retractable side barrier 16 is arranged on the side of the bed and can move with general rotation-translation movement between a high position (
In the example described with reference to
According to one disclosed characteristic, the mechanism is associated with a bottom extender 34 carried by two pins 36a, 36b that are spaced apart and secured to said deployment bar 26. Said extender 34 extends over practically the entire length of the main barrier element. It is attached to the deployment bar 26 via a sliding connection. Thus, the pins 36a, 36b are engaged in corresponding slots 38a, 38b of the extender 34. The extender is constrained to slide along vertical guide means carried by said main barrier element. More precisely, these guide means are constituted in this example by walls inside the cavity 30, which houses the top portion of the extender. In the example, the ends 40a, 40b of said extender that are longitudinally spaced apart come into sliding contact with two corresponding end walls 41a, 41b of the cavity 30. The cavity also houses the deployment bar 26 to which the extender 34 is attached. In the example described, the deployment bar 26 is horizontal as is the sliding connection (36a, 38a-36b, 38b), but that is not essential, it being possible for the arrangement to slope somewhat.
In the example, the two parallel arms 20a, 20b are outside the cavity defined by the support 28. They extend between the edge of the bed and the main barrier element 18 proper.
The extender 34 extends a little beyond the bottom longitudinal opening 32 of the cavity, through a distance that depends on the position of the barrier element 18 relative to the bedding plane. When the barrier is raised to its maximum, the extender 34 extends from the cavity so that the useful height of the barrier is at a maximum. On the contrary, when the barrier is in its lowest position, the extender 34 is retracted inside the cavity so that sufficient distance is maintained between the bottom edge of the barrier and the floor.
As can be seen in
In a variant, it is possible to adopt the configuration shown in
In yet another variant, the top ends of the two arms could be engaged in the cavity.
By analogy with the above, the embodiment shown in
The hinges 122a, 122b are situated respectively at the bottom ends of these uprights 155a, 155b. The uprights slide in guides 157a, 157b of the extender 134.
The pins 150a, 150b are also engaged in slots 159a, 159b of the extender 134 to form a sliding connection as in the above example, between said extender 134 and the deployment bar 126. The dynamics of this variant are similar to those of the above embodiment, the ramp 118a of the main barrier element 118 being further away from the top edge of the extender 134 when the system is in its high position (
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
07 56317 | Jul 2007 | FR | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2195955 | Hillenbrand | Apr 1940 | A |
2478028 | Travis | Aug 1949 | A |
2587291 | Des Rochers | Feb 1952 | A |
2658211 | Bendersky | Nov 1953 | A |
2676341 | Leone et al. | Apr 1954 | A |
2722017 | Burst et al. | Nov 1955 | A |
2766463 | Bendersky | Oct 1956 | A |
2817854 | Pratt | Dec 1957 | A |
2817855 | Pratt | Dec 1957 | A |
2871490 | Balonick | Feb 1959 | A |
3002200 | Murcott | Oct 1961 | A |
3012255 | Diehl | Dec 1961 | A |
3023781 | Constanti | Mar 1962 | A |
3045259 | Mayer | Jul 1962 | A |
3055020 | Mann | Sep 1962 | A |
3081463 | Williams et al. | Mar 1963 | A |
3220024 | Nelson | Nov 1965 | A |
3419922 | Malherbe | Jan 1969 | A |
3506989 | Ross et al. | Apr 1970 | A |
3526008 | Pruim | Sep 1970 | A |
3585659 | Burst et al. | Jun 1971 | A |
3641598 | Feldstein | Feb 1972 | A |
3840917 | Taylor | Oct 1974 | A |
3851345 | Benoit et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3855654 | Pivacek | Dec 1974 | A |
3865434 | Sully | Feb 1975 | A |
3930273 | Stern | Jan 1976 | A |
3932903 | Adams et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
3971083 | Peterson | Jul 1976 | A |
4103376 | Benoit et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4183015 | Drew et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4186456 | Huempfner | Feb 1980 | A |
4612679 | Mitchell | Sep 1986 | A |
4641385 | Peters et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4653129 | Kuck et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4747171 | Einsele et al. | May 1988 | A |
4949410 | Failor et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4985946 | Foster et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4987623 | Stryker et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4993089 | Solomon et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5044025 | Hunsinger et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5083334 | Huck et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5129117 | Celestina et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5187824 | Stryker | Feb 1993 | A |
5394580 | Foster et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5604942 | Allevato et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5732423 | Weismiller et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5784732 | Vail | Jul 1998 | A |
5802636 | Corbin et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5878452 | Brooke et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6021533 | Ellis et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6167580 | Draheim et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182310 | Weismiller et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6253397 | Bartow et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6360385 | Lewandowski | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6397416 | Brooke et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6446283 | Heimbrock et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6564404 | Nanahara | May 2003 | B1 |
6622323 | Zerhusen et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6640361 | Heimbrock et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6658680 | Osborne et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6691345 | Nanahara | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6751815 | Heimbrock et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6779209 | Ganance | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6829793 | Brooke et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6851142 | Stryker et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6874179 | Hensley et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6938289 | Morin | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6951036 | Lemire | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7028352 | Kramer et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7073220 | Simmonds et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7082630 | Castonguay et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7107637 | Kuek et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7412734 | Stryker et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7467427 | Wu et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7712167 | Guguin et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
20020144348 | Ganance | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20050166320 | Lemire | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060179569 | Vrzalik et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20090007333 | Guguin et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090007334 | Stryker et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3510707 | Oct 1986 | DE |
0 680 714 | Nov 1995 | EP |
1 053 735 | Nov 2000 | EP |
1 108 410 | Jun 2001 | EP |
1 243 207 | Sep 2002 | EP |
09206177 | Aug 1997 | JP |
09276340 | Oct 1997 | JP |
WO 9817153 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 0232271 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO 03070061 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO 2005-092153 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO 2007019692 | Feb 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100199428 A1 | Aug 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12166892 | Jul 2008 | US |
Child | 12766959 | US |