Patent Grant
11660415
The present invention relates to a patient interface for delivery of respiratory therapy to a patient. Examples of such therapies are Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) treatment, Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPY), and Variable Positive Airway Pressure (VPAP). The therapy is used for treatment of various respiratory conditions including Sleep Disordered Breathing (SDB) such as Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA).
Mask systems form an interface between a patient and apparatus providing a supply of pressurized air or breathing gas and are hence sometimes referred to as patient interfaces. In this specification, the words mask system and patient interface will be used interchangably. Mask systems in the field of the invention differ from mask systems used in other applications such as aviation and safety in particular because of their emphasis on comfort. This high level of comfort is desired because patients must sleep wearing the masks for hours, possibly each night for the rest of their lives. Mask systems typically, although not always, comprise (i) a rigid or semi-rigid portion often referred to as a shell or frame, (ii) a soft, patient contacting portion often referred to as a cushion, and (iii) some form of headgear to hold the frame and cushion in position. Mask systems often include a mechanism for connecting an air delivery conduit. The air delivery conduit is usually connected to a blower or flow generator.
A range of patient interfaces are known including nasal masks, nose & mouth masks, full face masks and nasal prongs, pillows, nozzles & cannulae. Masks typically cover more of the face than nasal prongs, pillows, nozzles and cannulae. In this specification, all will be collectively referred to as patient interfaces or mask systems. Nasal prongs, nasal pillows, nozzles and cannulae all will be collectively referred to as nasal prongs.
A first aspect of the invention relates to a patient interface for delivering breathable gas to a patient. A mask system in accordance with an embodiment of the invention provides improved seal, fit, comfort, stability, adjustability and ease of use compared to prior art mask systems. Other aspects of the invention include providing a small, lightweight, unobtrusive mask system. Another aspect is to provide a mask system that fits a wide range of different faces.
One aspect of improved seal is provided through the use of dual walled nasal pillows in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. Another aspect is the ability of a mask system in accordance with an embodiment of the invention to maintain a seal despite tube drag, side-sleeping, and other disruptions. Another aspect of improved seal and fit is through the adjustability provided by a mask in accordance with an embodiment of the invention which allows adjustment to better suit an individual patient's face.
A mask system in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is flexible and can fit a wide variety of facial shapes. An aspect of flexibility of a mask system in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is provided through the use of a semi-rigid frame. The use of a semi-rigid frame also leads to an improved seal with an elbow, and a reduction in the overall number of parts.
A mask system in accordance with an embodiment of the invention provides improved comfort through improved seal, meaning patients do not need to overtighten headgear straps to get a seal. Another aspect of improved comfort comes from removal of a rear buckle when compared to otherwise similar prior art mask systems. Another aspect of the invention providing improved comfort is through the improved attachment mechanism of stiffening portions of the interface stabilizing arrangement, for example, across the cheek regions. Another aspect of improved comfort of the present invention results from a more comfortable strap and or padding arrangement in the cheek region that leads to a reduction in “cheek mark” when compared to the prior art.
An aspect of improved stability provided to a mask in accordance with an embodiment of the invention is through support features that engage with the front of the face generally in the region of the maxilla and or zygoma, depending on the size of the patient's face.
An aspect of the present invention relates to a patient interface including a nasal prong assembly including a pair of nasal prongs structured to sealingly communicate with nasal passages of a patient's nose in use and headgear to maintain the nasal prong assembly in a desired position on the patient's face. The headgear includes side straps and rigidizers provided to respective side straps. Each rigidizer includes a first end portion that provides a connector structured to engage a respective end of the nasal prong assembly and a curved protrusion in the form of a cheek support that curves forward of the connector. The cheek support is adapted to follow the contour of the patient's cheek and guide a respective end portion of the side strap into engagement with the patient's cheek to provide a stable cheek support.
Another aspect of the invention relates to a patient interface for delivering breathable gas to a patient. The patient interface includes a nasal seal to sealingly communicate with the patient's nose in use and headgear to maintain the nasal seal in a desired position on the patient's face. The headgear includes side straps. Each side strap includes a curved protrusion in the form of a cheek support adapted to follow the contour of the patient's cheek and guide a respective end portion of the side strap into engagement with the patient's cheek to provide a stable cheek support.
Another aspect of the invention relates to a patient interface for delivering breathable gas to a patient. The patient interface includes a nasal seal to sealingly communicate with the patient's nose in use and headgear to maintain the nasal seal in a desired position on the patient's face. The headgear includes side straps each having a rigidizer with a slotted connector portion and a rear or back strap having ends that connect to a respective slotted connector portion.
Another aspect of the invention relates to a patient interface for delivering breathable gas to a patient. The patient interface includes a frame, a nasal prong assembly provided to the frame and adapted to provide an effective seal or interface with the patient's nose, an elbow provided to the frame and adapted to be connected to an air delivery tube that delivers breathable gas to the patient, and headgear adapted to support the patient interface in a desired position on the patient's head. The frame is relatively harder than the nasal prong assembly and relatively softer and more flexible than the elbow. In an embodiment, the frame is relatively softer and more flexible than the elbow and/or headgear yokes of the headgear. In an embodiment, the nasal prong assembly includes a gusset that allows a range of axial and lateral movement while maintaining a sufficient seal. In an embodiment, the headgear yoke of the headgear includes a yoke to frame interface structured to retain the headgear yoke to the frame, provide rotation relative to the frame, and provide a friction element to provide sufficient rotational torque (e.g., to reduce tube drag, to provide tactile/audible feedback).
Another aspect of the invention relates to a patient interface for delivering breathable gas to a patient. The patient interface includes a frame, a nasal prong assembly provided to the frame and adapted to provide an effective seal or interface with the patient's nose, an elbow provided to the frame and adapted to be connected to an air delivery tube that delivers breathable gas to the patient, and headgear adapted to support the patient interface in a desired position on the patient's head. The headgear includes side straps and rigidizers provided to respective side straps. Each rigidizer includes a frame interface structured to retain the rigidizer to the frame, provide rotation relative to the frame, and provide a friction element to provide sufficient rotational torque.
Another aspect of the invention relates to a patient interface for delivering breathable gas to a patient. The patient interface includes a pair of nasal prongs adapted to provide an effective seal or interface with the patient's nose and a support arrangement to support the nasal prongs in an operative position on the patient's face. The support arrangement is structured to provide a range of rotational, axial, and lateral movement to the nasal prongs while maintaining a sufficient seal and resisting the application of tube drag and headgear tension to the nasal prongs.
Another aspect of the invention relates to a headgear link member for connecting two or more straps of a headgear assembly for securing a respiratory mask to a patient. The link member is flexible and has connector portions for adjustable connection to said two or more straps.
Another aspect of the invention relates to a headgear assembly for securing a respiratory mask to a patient including a pair of rear headgear straps located in use at a rear portion of the patient's head and a headgear link member connecting the rear headgear straps. The straps and link member are configured such that each strap passes through the link member in a single U-shape and is secured back to itself.
Another aspect of the invention relates to headgear for a patient interface including a pair of side straps. Each of the side straps includes an upper strap portion adapted to pass over the top of the patient's head, a front strap portion adapted to pass along the side of the patient's head, and a rear strap portion adapted to pass around a rear portion of the patient's head. The free end of each rear strap portion includes a tab of hook material, and one side of each rear strap portion is coated with un-broken loop material which allows the tab of hook material to fasten anywhere along its length.
Another aspect of the invention relates to a patient interface for delivering breathable gas to a patient including a frame and a nasal prong assembly provided to the frame. The nasal prong assembly includes a pair of nasal prongs adapted to provide an effective seal or interface with the patient's nose. The nasal prong assembly includes a frame contacting portion that is adapted to be inserted and retained within a frame channel provided to the frame. The frame contacting portion includes an external protrusion that is adapted to protrude through a corresponding opening provided in the frame channel.
Another aspect of the invention relates to a tube retainer for retaining an air delivery tube to a headgear strap of headgear. The tube retainer includes a first strap portion adapted to loop around a headgear strap of headgear and a second strap portion provided to the first strap portion and adapted to loop around an air delivery tube. The first and second strap portions are integrally formed in one-piece from a soft and flexible material with the second strap portion extending transverse to the first strap portion. Each strap portion includes a hook and loop arrangement adapted to secure the respective strap portion in position.
Another aspect of the invention relates to a tube retaining assembly for retaining air delivery tubing including a headgear buckle including opposing locking portions adapted to be removably and adjustably coupled with respective headgear straps of headgear and a tube retainer provided to the headgear buckle. The tube retainer includes a pair of arcuate arms adapted to retain air delivery tubing.
Other aspects, features, and advantages of this invention will become apparent from the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, which are a part of this disclosure and which illustrate, by way of example, principles of this invention.
The accompanying drawings facilitate an understanding of the various embodiments of this invention. In such drawings:
In broad terms, a patient interface in accordance with an embodiment of the invention may comprise three functional aspects: (i) interfacing, (ii) a positioning and stabilizing, and (iii) air delivery. These three functional aspects may be constructed from one or more structural components, with a given structural component potentially fulfilling more than one function. For example, a mask frame may serve as part of a positioning and stabilizing function and allow the supply of air.
In addition, a patient interface in accordance with an embodiment of the invention may perform other functions including venting of exhaled gases, decoupling of potentially seal disruptive forces and adjustment for different sized faces. Venting may be performed by different structures, such as a frame, an elbow and/or a conduit.
The following description is provided in relation to several embodiments which may share common characteristics and features. It is to be understood that one or more features of any one embodiment may be combinable with one or more features of the other embodiments. In addition, any single feature or combination of features in any of the embodiments may constitute additional embodiments.
In this specification, the word “comprising” is to be understood in its “open” sense, that is, in the sense of “including”, and thus not limited to its “closed” sense, that is the sense of “consisting only of”. A corresponding meaning is to be attributed to the corresponding words “comprise”, “comprised” and “comprises” where they appear.
The term “air” will be taken to include breathable gases, for example air with supplemental oxygen. It is also acknowledged that the positive airway pressure (PAP) devices or flow generators described herein may be designed to pump fluids other than air.
Each illustrated embodiment includes features that may be used with the embodiments and/or components described in U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos. 2004-0226566, 2006-0137690, and 2005-0241644, PCT Application Publication Nos. WO 2005/063328, WO 2006/130903, and WO 2007/053878, and U.S. Provisional Application Nos. 60/835,442, filed Aug. 4, 2006, and 60/852,649, filed Oct. 19, 2006, as would be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art. Each of the above noted applications are incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. However, it should be appreciated that any single feature or combination of features in any of the embodiments may be applied to other suitable mask arrangements, e.g., full-face, etc.
In one form of the invention, the interfacing function is provided by a pair of nasal prongs (or “nasal pillows”) that are placed at an entrance to the patient's nares. Each prong is structured to form an adequate seal with its respective naris and is shaped, oriented, sized and constructed so as provide a fit with a range of differently shaped and located nares.
As shown in
The nasal prong assembly 20 may be integrally formed in one-piece, e.g., by silicone in an injection molding process (e.g., LSR (liquid silicone rubber) and CMSR (compression molded silicon rubber) molding technology). However, the nasal prong assembly 20 may be formed in other suitable processes.
In an embodiment, one end of the nasal prong assembly is provided with a plug and the other end is provided with an elbow (e.g., swivel elbow). The positions of the elbow and the plug may be interchanged, according to preference, e.g., the typical sleeping position of the patient. In an alterative embodiment, both ends of the nasal prong assembly may be provided with an elbow. An air delivery tube is joined to the elbow or elbows to deliver a source of pressurized gas (e.g., 2-30 cmH2O).
In an embodiment, the nasal prong assembly may include a “low flow” version with a different pressure flow requirement.
The nasal prong assembly provides a lightweight, unobtrusive arrangement for delivering positive airway pressure as a means of therapy, e.g., for OSA.
The following discussion in the “Interfacing” section of this detailed description principally relates to the cone-shaped portion of the prong, other aspects of the prong—such as the stalk—will be discussed in more detail in subsequent sections.
The nasal prongs may include geometry and/or anthropometrical features similar to the nasal prongs described in U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos. 2004-0226566, 2006-0137690 and PCT Application Publication Nos. WO 2006/130903, and WO 2007/053878, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Also, rotating the nasal prong assembly in relation to the headgear can physically rotate the prongs in an anterior/posterior direction in relation to the nose. This flexibility effectively sets the prongs into an “exact” comfortable position for an individual user.
Further, the prong's stalk provides a flexible point to allow prong alignment and seal maintenance.
For example, the orientation of the nasal prongs is designed to present the exit holes and the conical sealing surfaces as square to the nostril openings as possible. This increases the effectiveness of the seal. The prongs have been angled and rotated in relation to the base in order to provide this orientation for average anthropometry.
As shown in top view
In combination with this orienting geometry, the prongs can be adapted to nasal geometry variations from patient to patient in a number of ways. Firstly, the prongs may be available in multiple sizes (e.g., extra small, small, medium, large, extra large). The variant geometry between sizes may be the diameters of the oval prong profile.
Spacing of the pillows is illustrated in
In an embodiment, the nasal prongs 24 may be similar to nasal prongs those described in WO 2006/130903, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
For example, as shown in
One of the advantages of dual wall nasal prongs that may be used to improve jetting performance is that it is possible to reorient the inner exit hole at any angle while retaining a “square” sealing orientation for the outer wall.
One aspect of dual pillows construction is that the inner surface of the outer membrane may be frosted to facilitate removal from the molding tool. Also, the outer surface of the outer membrane may be frosted, e.g., for comfort and for improving fitting to nose because less sticking.
The following embodiments describe alternative prong arrangements that are structured to improve sealing comfort and/or fitting. In embodiments, the prong arrangements may be structured to reduce and/or eliminate the air jetting effect, e.g., redirect air flow direction (e.g., away from sensitive regions such as the septum), diffuse air flow or create turbulence, and/or change the prong orifice in order to reduce and/or eliminate air jetting effects. Reducing and/or eliminating the air jetting effect may provide increased comfort across a wider pressure range and/or reduced concentrated dryness and cold burning sensation. In addition, adding turbulence may reduce noise.
Additional prong arrangements to improve comfort and fitting are described in U.S. Provisional Application Nos. 60/835,442, filed Aug. 4, 2006, and 60/852,649, filed Oct. 19, 2006, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The nasal prong embodiments described below include a dual or double-wall head portion. While embodiments described below relate to dual-wall nasal prongs, it should be appreciated that embodiments of the invention may be adapted for use with single-wall nasal prongs and/or multi-wall nasal prongs (e.g., 2 or more walls).
Dual Wall with Hood
As illustrated, the hood 234 is provided to anterior and medial portions (i.e., front and middle portions) of the inner wall 226 along the perimeter of the orifice. The hood 234 is structured to direct the air posteriorly, e.g., towards the rear, rather than straight up the nasal passage. In addition, the hood 234 is structured to direct the air laterally, e.g., towards the side, rather than towards the septum. Thus, the hood 234 is structured to change the air flow in two planes such that the hood 234 directs the air flow away from the septum and avoids direct contact with sensitive areas of the anterior nose.
Dual Wall with Dome
As illustrated, the dome 335 has a hemispherical shape that extends over the orifice of the inner wall 326 and provides an eccentrically placed exit hole to direct the air away from sensitive regions of the patient's nose, e.g., septum. In an embodiment, the exit hole may be positioned to direct air similar to the hood described above, e.g., direct the air posteriorly and laterally.
Dual Wall with Blocked Orifice and Holes on Inner and Outer Walls
Further, the outer wall 428 may optionally include one or more holes 437. In the illustrated embodiment, the holes 437 are provided to an upper region of the outer wall (e.g., near the orifice) on a medial portion of the outer wall which is oriented towards the patient's face in use (e.g., near the patient's top lip). Similar to the holes 436 in the inner wall, the holes 437 in the outer wall may be provided to other suitable portions of the outer wall, may be have other suitable shapes, and may have any suitable number of holes, e.g., 1, 2, 3, or more holes.
In the illustrated embodiment, the holes 436 in the inner wall are larger than the holes 437 in the outer wall. However, other suitable sizes are possible.
In use, the holes 436, 437 disperse air as it passes through the prong 424, e.g., to create turbulence and/or reduce impedance.
Dual Wall with Blocked Orifice and Castellated Openings
In use, the openings 536 direct the flow laterally from the blocked orifice to disperse and/or diffuse air as it passes through the prong, e.g., to create turbulence.
In an alternative embodiment, the orifice of the inner wall 526 may not be blocked and the top of the inner wall 526 may include the castellated-type arrangement to disperse air.
Dual Wall with Elongated Inner Wall
Dual Wall with Insert
As illustrated, the insert 738 includes a base 738(1) adapted to support the insert 738 in a operative position adjacent the orifice of the inner wall 726 and a head 738(2) that provides an exit opening to change the air flow direction. The length of the head 738(2) may be changed, e.g., customized length for particular patient, to provide a longer or shorter exit from the inner wall 726. In the illustrated embodiment, the wall of the insert 738 may be constructed of a foam or silicone material. Alternatively, the entire volume of the insert 738 may be constructed of foam, e.g., similar to the foam insert described below.
The insert 738 is secured to the inner wall 726 to prevent removal and possible inhalation in use. In an embodiment, the inner wall 726 may include an annular flange or shoulder around the orifice adapted to support or secure the insert 738 in position. However, the insert 738 may be supported in its operative position in other suitable manners, e.g., adhesive, friction fit, mechanical interlock, etc. In an embodiment, a connector may be provided between inserts of adjacent prongs to prevent discharge of an insert through the orifice, e.g., during inspiration.
In an embodiment, the insert 738 may be retrofitted to an existing nasal prong in order to direct flow in a similar manner to a hood. For example, the exit opening of the insert 738 may be positioned to direct air in a similar manner to the hood described above, e.g., direct the air posteriorly and laterally. Thus, the insert 738 may be made as a “spare part” or separate accessory and used only when the patient is suffering from jetting effect with an existing nasal prong assembly.
Dual Wall with Internal Ledge
As illustrated, the ledge or shelf 839 extends inwardly from the edge of the orifice. In an alternative embodiment, the ledge or shelf 839 may be spaced downwardly from the edge of the orifice, e.g., to reduce impedance.
In yet another alternative, as shown in
Dual Wall with Mesh or Gauze
In use, the mesh or gauze 940 increases the dispersion and turbulence of the air as it exits the prong orifice and enters the patient's nasal passage.
In an alternative embodiment, the mesh or gauze 940 may be designed as an anti-asphyxia valve (AAV) style flap adapted to cover the prong orifice on inspiration and fall open on expiration to reduce impedance.
Dual Wall with Exit Gate
In use, the gate 1041 increases the dispersion and turbulence of the air as it exits the orifice and enters the patient's nasal passage.
It should be appreciated that the gate 1041 may be provided at other suitable locations along the prong (e.g., at the outer wall, along the stalk, etc.), and the gate 1041 may have other suitable shapes and orientations. In addition, the gate 1041 may have any suitable number of vanes 1041(2), e.g., 3, 4, 5, or more vanes.
For example,
In yet another alternative, such a pinwheel-shaped or star-shaped gate may be provided to a single wall prong, e.g., at the exit orifice of the prong.
Dual Wall with Foam Insert
The foam insert 1238 may be supported by the inner wall 1226 in its operative position in any suitable manner, e.g., adhesive, friction fit, mechanical interlock, etc. For example, the foam insert 1238 may be squeezed into the cavity and then allowed to resiliently expand into engagement with the inner wall 1226. In an embodiment, a connector may be provided between foam inserts of adjacent prongs to prevent discharge of an insert through the orifice, e.g., during inspiration.
In use, air passes through the thickness of the foam insert 1238 which increases the dispersion and turbulence of the air as it exits the prong orifice and enters the patient's nasal passage.
In another alternative embodiment, each prong may include an insert constructed of a silicone material and provided with relatively small channels through the interior to diffuse the flow of air in use. Inserts constructed of other suitable materials are also possible, e.g., Gore-Tex.
In yet another embodiment, the insert (e.g., foam or silicone insert) may provide a mechanical valve type arrangement. For example, the insert may be adapted to cover the orifice and act as a diffuser on inspiration, and open or uncover the orifice on expiration. In an embodiment, the insert may include a cone-shape with a hollow center to facilitate movement between covering and uncovering positions.
Dual Wall with Cut Inner Wall
Dual Wall with Chevron-Pattern Exit Hole
However, the orifice may have other suitable shapes or patterns around its perimeter. For example,
In use, the non-oval-shaped orifice increases the dispersion and turbulence of the air as it exits the orifice and enters the patient's nasal passage.
Dual Wall with Alternative Base
It is to be understood that these dimensions and ranges are merely exemplary and other dimensions and ranges are possible depending on application. Also, such base may be provided to a nasal prong having a single wall configuration.
Manufacturing
In an embodiment, the dual-wall prong may be molded into its operative dual wall construction. In an alternative embodiment, one of the inner and outer walls may be molded in an open position and then inverted or folded to form the dual wall construction.
In yet another embodiment, as shown in
Thin Wall Thickness
For example,
Support of Thin Outer Wall
A support structure may be provided to a thin outer wall (such as that described above in
For example, as shown in
In another embodiment, as shown in
In another embodiment, as shown in
In another embodiment, as shown in
In another embodiment, a dual wall prong may be provided and the inner wall may be substantially rigid (e.g., thickness greater than about 0.4 mm (e.g., 0.4 to 0.8 mm)) in order to support and guide the thin outer wall into engagement with the patient's nose before use. That is, the thin outer wall provides a seal-forming thinner wall and the inner wall provides a structure-defining thicker wall that adds stiffness to the thin outer wall as it is engaged and aligned with the patient's nose before use. In use, pressurized air causes the outer wall to bulge outwardly into conformance with the patient's nose, e.g., pressure supported seal.
In another embodiment, as shown in
In another embodiment, as shown in
In an embodiment, the ball-type insert 2338 may have a sphere-like shape and may include one or more perforations, grooves, dimples, or detents along its exterior surface. However, the ball-type insert 2338 may have other suitable shapes, e.g., non sphere-like.
In an embodiment, a connector 2338(1) may be provided between ball-type inserts 2338 of adjacent prongs to prevent discharge of the inserts 2338 through respective orifices.
It should be appreciated that the ball-type insert 2338 may be adapted for use with dual-wall nasal prongs.
In another embodiment, a one-way valve may be provided to the vent arrangement of the nasal prong assembly to reduce the pressure of exhalation and allow easier nose breathing. The one-way valve is adapted to pivot or otherwise move between (1) an open position that uncovers the vent arrangement to allow venting during exhalation, and (2) a closed position that covers at least a portion of the vent arrangement during inhalation. The valve may provide variable vent flow in the closed position, e.g., depending on closed portion of vent arrangement. The threshold pressure may be set at therapy pressure, such that the valve moves to the open position during exhalation as added pressure from the patient's lungs exceeds therapy pressure.
In the illustrated embodiment, a blocking flap or valve 2447 may be provided to one or both ends of the base 2422 (e.g., depending on whether air enters the base via one or both ends) to control the flow of air entering the base 2422 and hence the pair of nasal prongs 2424. As illustrated, the blocking flap or valve 2447 is adapted to pivot or otherwise move between (1) an open or partially open position that uncovers at least a portion of the end of the base to allow pressurized air to enter the base during inhalation (see
In an alternative embodiment, a vibratable flap may be provided along the flow path to introduce random diffuse of air.
In another embodiment, the prong may be configured to change frequency, e.g., like jet engine.
In
In an alternative embodiment, as shown in
As illustrated, the nasal insert 2624 includes a dual or double-wall arrangement with an inner wall 2626 and an outer wall 2628 that surrounds the inner wall 2626. An air pocket 2648 is provided between the inner and outer walls 2626, 2628. In use, air enters the pocket 2648 to inflate the outer wall 2628 or cause the outer wall 2628 to bulge more outwardly. Such arrangement allows the outer wall 2628 to seal and conform within the patient's nasal passage.
As shown in
Alternatively, as shown in
The following figures illustrate embodiments structured to improve seal, stability, and/or comfort, for example.
In an embodiment, the prongs may be molded in one piece with the base, and the recess surrounding each prong is exposed to the molding tool's open and shut direction, e.g., to avoid an undercut.
In an embodiment, as shown in
In an embodiment, headgear straps of headgear may be structured to utilize skeletal features of the patient's face to achieve stability (e.g., increase surface area of straps). For example, as shown in
In the illustrated embodiment, the strap 4045 extends along the base of the head portion of the prongs 4024. However, the strap may engage the prongs at other suitable locations. In an embodiment, the strap 4045 may be integrally formed in one piece with the prongs 4024. In an alternative embodiment, the strap 4045 be formed separately from the prongs (e.g., from a silicone material with sufficient rigidity to allow pulling/pushing) and attached or retrofit to the prongs 4024. For example, the strap 4045 may include spaced openings for receiving respective prongs 4024 therethrough.
Also, the strap 4045 adds stability to the prongs 4024 by preventing tube drag from pulling prongs out of engagement with the patient's nose. That is, the linking member allows the prong that normally wants to draw out of the patient's nose due to tube drag to be held in place by the other prong.
In an alternative embodiment, the tube entry point may be relocated to the front of the frame for the nasal prong assembly, which may eliminate the need for plugs, seal rings, etc. In yet another embodiment, a central soft tube connection may be incorporated into the nasal prong assembly. The soft tube connection may be structured to accommodate flexibility and movement (e.g., increased decoupling of forces) and may be molded to avoid kinking or reduction of airflow.
In the illustrated embodiment, the spiral tubing 4314 is provided to one end of the nasal prong assembly 4320 for delivering pressurized breathable gas. In an embodiment, the spiral tubing 4314 may be spring loaded or biased to keep the tubing compact and neat and to prevent tangling.
The spiral tubing 4314 may be particularly advantageous for use with such nasal prong assembly 4320. Specifically, because tubing for the nasal prong assembly is asymmetric or provided to only one side of the nasal prong assembly, typical elongated tubing (e.g., 2 m elongate tubing) may provide enough pass to pull the nasal prong arrangement sideways (e.g., when the patient moves around in bed) which may break the seal between the nasal prongs and the patient's nares. However, the spiral tubing 4314 provides a flexible arrangement that allows sufficient extension and retraction of the tubing in use. This arrangement reduces tube drag and effectively decouples the tubing from the nasal prong assembly to prevent breaking of the seal.
In an alternative embodiment, at least a portion of the prong may be constructed of a foam material. For example, the entire head portion of the prong may be constructed of a foam material, and provide a foam contact surface to interface with the patient's nasal passages. The foam head portion may provide grip, warming sensation, and/or improved comfort in use.
In an alternative embodiment, side walls of the prong may include a question-mark or sickle shaped configuration.
As shown in
In the illustrated embodiment, each head portion 5025 includes a dual or double-wall arrangement including an inner wall 5026 (inner membrane or support membrane) and an outer wall 5028 (outer membrane or sealing membrane) that surrounds the inner wall 5026. The outer wall 5028 may be relatively thin (e.g., 0.35 mm) with respect to the inner wall 5026 (e.g., 0.75 mm) to conform to the shape of the patient's nose and provide a more compliant seal.
The stalk 5022 may be relatively short (e.g., about 2-8 mm, e.g., 5.1 mm), e.g., due to flexibility provided by the gusset 5022.
In other forms of the invention, alternative interfacing structures may be used. For example, a nasal cradle as described in International Patent Application PCT/AU2007/001051, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by cross-reference.
Other alternative forms of interfacing structure could be as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,782,832 (Trimble et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 5,724,965 (Handke et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 6,119,694 (Correa et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 6,431,172 (Bordewick), and International Patent Application WO 2000/74758 (Lovell et al.), the contents of each of which is hereby incorporated by cross-reference.
A patient interface in accordance with an embodiment of the invention provides a structure for suitable positioning, suspension and stabilizing of the interfacing portion of the patient interface at an entrance to the airways of the patient. This structure includes the stalks of the nasal prongs, the gusset portion, the frame and headgear with stabilizers. The structure as a whole may be regarded as positioning the interfacing portions. The stalks of the nasal prongs, and the gusset portion together function as a form of suspension system. The headgear and stabilizers form a structure that resists bending (for example from tube drag) and yet is flexible to conform to different facial geometries, or to move in response to other potentially disruptive forces. In combination with the suspension system, a greater range of movement of a mask system in accordance with an embodiment of the invention can be accommodated without disrupting the seal than in prior art mask systems.
A frame in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention serves a number of functions, including serving as a connection point to which the gusset, headgear stabilizers and elbow may be connected. A given functional feature may reside in different structures. For example, the stabilizing portion of headgear may be formed as part of a frame either additionally or alternatively.
Stalks
As shown in
In an embodiment, the height H of the stalk 27 may be between 5-15 mm, e.g., 7 mm, 8 mm, 9 mm, 12 mm, etc.
In an alternative embodiment, as shown in
Gusset
As best shown in
The gusset 5022 provides structure that creates an axial force to enhance axial or vertical movement (e.g., gusset and prongs (e.g., prong compression) together can move axially or vertically up to about 17 mm), and provide contact with the patient's upper lip, and create an axial force to enhance the nasal prong seal. The gusset also allows lateral movement to enhance stability while maintaining a sufficient seal with an acceptable amount of leak to maintain a sufficient seal (e.g., gusset and prongs (e.g., prong flexibility and dual wall movement) together can move laterally up to about 7-10 mm total with less than 0.5 L/min leak), provides a trampoline like base due to a relatively thin base (e.g., 0.75 mm) which allows articulation and extra flexibility of the nasal prongs, provides compressibility, and provides a wide range of movement of fit a large range of patients.
The dual wall nasal prongs in combination with the gusset enhances the lateral movement of the nasal prong assembly. Also, each nasal prong may include an upper trampoline-like suspension system between the head portion and the stalk, and a lower trampoline-like suspension system between the stalk and the gusset base, which allows rotation of the stalk relative to both the head portion and the gusset base, and allow reduction in height of the head portion relative to the gusset base (e.g., thin gusset base allows retraction of the stalk into the base).
The gusset increases the range of adjustability to substantially prevent overtightening of the headgear, e.g., gusset can compress axially to absorb headgear tension.
As illustrated in
As shown in the side view of
As shown in the front view of
Combination of Pillows and Gusset
A suspension system combination of pillows and gusset in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention provides significant improvement over related and prior pillows. To facilitate an understanding of the nature of the improvement, it is helpful to consider the following:
To effect an adequate seal against a surface, a system can present an interfacing component (e.g. the top portion or head of the pillow) against the face (or surface of the nose) with an appropriate force that restricts the flow of air between the surface of the face and that of the interfacing component. An unnecessarily high level of force is both uncomfortable and unhealthy—with a range of symptoms from red marks to sores and skin necrosis. Most mask systems use a flexible cushioning material positioned against the skin and located between the skin and more rigid components of the mask. The cushioning component may be modeled mechanically as one or more springs.
Generally the spring arrangements of cushions in consideration have a range of possible compression before they are fully compressed or “bottomed out”. Once fully compressed, a cushion will generally have little “cushioning” effect, and simply transfer to the face whatever force has been established through headgear tension. We have discovered that it is desirable for improved comfort and seal to provide for significantly more movement before a cushion is fully compressed. As will be presently described, prior nasal pillow arrangements in masks of the presently contemplated type (e.g., Puritan Bennett Adam's Circuit, ResMed Mirage Swift, Innomed Bravo, Respironics Optilife, Fisher & Paykel Opus) provide from about 1 mm to about 6 mm vertical movement, whereas a nasal pillows system according to an embodiment of the present invention can provide up to about 10 mm vertical movement before fully compressing the pillows.
We have also discovered that comfort and seal of a nasal pillows mask system can be improved if it can accommodated greater lateral movement (e.g., left to right, right to left) without breaking a seal than that provided by known nasal pillows mask systems. For example, providing greater lateral movement facilitates side sleeping. A mask system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention provides approximately five times the lateral movement of SWIFT II without unacceptably leaking.
It is noted that U.S. Pat. No. 6,431,172 (Bordewick) appears to illustrate a nasal pillow similar to the BREEZE nasal pillow, however instead of being mounted on a rigid support, it is mounted on an inflatable plenum chamber. As far as we are aware, no commercial sample was ever produced and hence we are unable to test it. Since the base region is described as “entirely flaccid” and “not effective in transmitting forces between nares elements and rigid support” we expect it not to have any “springiness” (or a spring constant with a value of zero).
A portion of the pillows of the Fisher & Paykel OPUS 2 mask is shown in
As shown in
For example, as shown in
As shown in
As shown in
Another known form of nasal pillow is described in International Patent Application No. PCT/AU2006/000770 (Lubke et al., assigned to ResMed) published as WO 2006/130903. This nasal pillow is particularly suited for an oro-nasal mask. Because the oro-nasal mask includes nasal pillows extending from a mouth cushion, they have a significantly longer stalk region than the nasal pillows discussed above. This long stalk arrangement also provides a significant amount of flexibility and articulation, however this long-stalk arrangement is a different configuration to the present example. In the present example, significant articulation and movement is provided in relatively short stalks when compared to the oro-nasal mask of WO 2006/130903. Furthermore, the corresponding top region of the mouth cushion to which the long-stalk pillows are connected is relatively stiff compared to the top region of the present example.
Gusset to Frame Attachment
As shown in
As best shown in
It is noted that, without the sealing lip 5029.2 or bead 5033.1, the end portion 5029.1 would still be able to provide a seal just by interference of the end portion 5029.1 and the frame. However, the sealing lip and bead arrangement are structured to allow quite a bit of disassembly of the nasal prong assembly from the frame without any increase in leak. For example,
In one form the frame bead 5033.1 has a protrusion in the range of 0.4 mm to 1.2 mm, preferably 0.8 mm. The angle of the underside of the bead is preferably in the range 85° to 95°, preferably 90°. Other protrusion values and angles are possible. More than one bead may also be used.
As shown in
In an embodiment, the end portion 5029.1 of the frame contacting portion 5029 may be sufficiently long (e.g., D23 is about 5 mm long) to help locate the end portion 5029.1 in the frame channel 5033 before an insertion force is applied to secure the end portion 5029.1 in position. In addition, the end portion 5029.1 may provide only a slight taper so that the end portion 5029.1 is sufficiently thick to aid insertion and/or to create interference in the channel, increasing retention. The end portion 5029.1 may also be very long, e.g., the whole depth of the frame channel, to increase retention. This length may vary around the perimeter of the end portion, e.g., only at the front and back, between protrusions 5629.1 (described below), etc.
In an embodiment, the frame contacting portion 5029 and frame channel 5033 may provide locating features to properly align the nasal prong assembly 5020 with respect to the frame 5030 and prevent askew assembly. For example, the frame contacting portion 5029 may include one or more corners/protrusions (example described below) that are adapted to fit into corresponding recesses provided in the frame channel 5033. However, other suitable locating arrangements are possible.
Opposing sides of the frame channel 6033 include the opening 6033.1, which extends from the channel to the frame exterior. When the frame contacting portion 6029 is inserted and retained within the frame channel 6033, the external catches 6029.3 protrude through respective openings 6033.1 to the frame exterior. As illustrated, recessed portions 6032.1 are provided to the frame exterior adjacent each opening 6033.1, e.g., for tooling. The recessed portions 6032.1 also allow visual feedback of complete assembly and facilitate access to the catches 6029.1 for assembly, e.g., if the catches get stuck.
As shown in
In an embodiment, the nasal prong assembly may be attached to the frame in either of two orientations (180° with respect to one another) and then the headgear must be correctly attached to ensure correct orientation of the nasal prong assembly with respect to the patient's face in use (e.g., headgear and frame/nasal prong assembly may include marking to ensure proper assembly/orientation). However, if the headgear is first attached to the frame, then the nasal prong assembly must be correctly oriented and attached to the frame (same markings apply).
In an alternative embodiment, the patient interface may be structured such that the nasal prong assembly may be attached to the frame in only one way and the headgear may be attached to the frame in only one way in order to ensure correct assembly/orientation (e.g., use mechanical constraints such that left side frame to left side yoke only and right side frame to right side yoke only).
The curved end of the gusset portion (see for example
Other gusset to frame mechanisms may be used. See for example the disclosure of International Patent Application PCT/AU03/00458 published as WO 03/090827. Other mechanisms may also be used, for example that used in the cushion-to-frame mechanism of the Fisher & Paykel OPUS. In this case, the orientation of the bead may be perpendicular to the orientation of the illustrated embodiment. In another form, the cushion and frame may be comolded and hence no gusset/cushion to frame mechanism would be required.
For example, in
In another embodiment, vertical ribs along the channel of the frame and/or along the frame contacting portion of the nasal prong assembly may be used to create interference for securing the frame contacting portion within the frame channel.
For example, the frame may only include opposing frame ribs A, and the frame contacting portion may be extended around its perimeter except where the opposing frame ribs A would be located. In another embodiment, the frame may only include opposing frame ribs A and C (see
Assembly of Prongs and Gusset
As shown in
In an embodiment, one or more portions of the exterior surface of the nasal prong assembly 5020 (e.g., the entire exterior surface) may have a frosted or fine surface finish (e.g., sand blasted) in order to reduce dust collection.
In an embodiment of the nasal prong assembly (see
In an embodiment, the nasal prong assembly may be provided in multiple sizes, e.g., small, medium, and large.
As shown in
Referring to
Each connector 5034 of the frame includes a cavity 5036 having structure to retain respective headgear yoke 5055 of the headgear 5050. In addition, the exterior surface of each connector 5034 includes one or more locking bumps 5038 (e.g., three locking bumps or six locking bumps) adapted to engage ratchet teeth of respective yoke 5055. Attachment of the headgear yoke 5055 to the frame 5030 is described in greater detail below.
The frame 5030 is constructed of a relatively semi-rigid or soft plastic material (e.g., hard silicone (e.g., 30-80 shore A silicone, preferably 70 shore A silicone, or about 60 or 80 shore A silicone), TPE, thermoplastic polyurethanes). As a result, the frame 5030 is relatively softer and more flexible than the relatively hard plastic material of the elbow 5040 and the yokes 5055 of the headgear 5050. The flexibility of the frame may be adjusted, e.g., frame may have different degrees of flexibility. However, it should be appreciated that the frame may be constructed of other suitable materials, e.g., harder plastic material. In addition, the frame may have thicker wall section to add hardness. For example, the hardness of the frame material could extend to the Shore D hardness scale in the range of 45 to 85, or on the Rockwell R scale in the range of 50 to 100. It could be made from rubbers, polyurethanes, polyesters, PTFE, polypropylenes and other plastics.
A frame constructed of silicone provides an arrangement that is easier to seal (e.g., with the elbow), and provides no squeak in use (e.g., when elbow/yokes rotated with respect to frame), without requiring an additional part and with reduced leak (e.g., effectively zero leak).
In an embodiment of the frame (see
Flexibility of the frame allows a given mask system to accommodate a range of different facial geometries, for example ranging from narrower, pointed faces (the so-called “crocodile” or “alligator” shape) to the wider, flatter shape (the so-called “panda” shape). The soft frame is also aesthetically nicer and soft to touch. The outside surface finish conceals internal details (ribs) and reduces dust. A surface finish may be applied to inside surfaces also.
Naso-Labial Angular Adjustment/Yoke to Frame
In an illustrated embodiment, headgear is attached to the frame 5030 via headgear yoke 5055 (e.g., see
The frame and nasal prong assembly attached thereto may be rotated with respect to the yokes positioned on the patient's head to allow adjustment to suit the nasolabial angle for a large range of patients. In addition, such adjustment allows movement of the nasal prongs to avoid air jetting. Because the rotation point RP (see
As best shown in
As shown in
The snap fingers 5085.5 and tip extension 5085.7 are structured to retain the yoke to the frame, e.g., axial retention and lever retention. In an embodiment, as shown in
In an embodiment, the yoke 5055 may be pivoted with respect to the frame 5030 without disassembly by an angle D1 of about 5-15°, e.g., due to lever retention and/or frame flexibility.
As shown in
For example, such arrangement allows 360° rotation of the yoke with respect to the frame, provides position locks at 15° increments, and the soft to hard interface (relatively soft frame engages relatively hard yoke) provides tactile feedback to the user with each adjustment. However, the ratchet teeth/locking bumps may be structured to provide other suitable incremental position locks.
The size of the ratchet teeth 5085.4 and locking bumps 5038 may be determined by fitting a maximum number of increments (e.g., 6 to 72 teeth at 60° to 5° increments, e.g., 24 teeth at 15° increments) around a minimum diameter. In an embodiment, the length of tooth engagement (i.e., contact length between locking bump and ratchet tooth) may be determined by the shallowest point of yoke contacting frame on assembly (e.g., about 2 mm).
It should be appreciated that the torque (e.g., to resist tube drag) may be adjusted, e.g., torque increased by adding more locking bumps 5038 to frame connectors 5034. Also, instead of a ratcheting type arrangement, other suitable torque arrangements may be provided, e.g., friction-type, magnetic, etc.
In alternative embodiment, the one or more locking bumps of the frame may be separated by truncated or squared-off teeth to allow for easier rotation of the yoke with respect to the frame. For example,
The indents 5639.1 between the locking bumps and the truncated teeth make the locking bumps 5638 longer, meaning that the stress and thus wear on these elements is lower. In addition, as shown in
As shown in
The yoke to frame interface 5685 is structured to provide easy assembly to and disassembly from the frame 5630 (e.g., clear and intuitive assembly, tactile feedback of engagement, easy disassembly for cleaning), retain the frame 5630 during use (e.g., prevent accidental disassembly during use), provide rotation relative to the frame 5630, and provide a friction element to provide sufficient rotational torque (e.g., to reduce tube drag, provide tactile/audible feedback). Torque is also provided by interference on the “shaft” between the yoke and the frame, not just the ratchet teeth. For example,
The yoke connection involved in the yoke to frame interface 5685 consists primarily of an annular side wall 5685.2, rear wall 5685.3 and central hub 5685.1 (e.g., see
The inner radius of side wall 5685.2 has multiple ratchet teeth 5685.4 (e.g., 3, 4, 5, or more teeth) to provide friction while allowing for some rotation of the frame with respect to the yoke (e.g., see
The central hub 5685.1 (e.g., shown in
The rear wall 5685.3 has a window 5685.7 to allow for unimpeded rotation of the frame with respect to the yoke (e.g., see
In
The ball and socket joint 7285 allows greater axial rotational and some lateral rotation. A high degree of rotation at the yoke to frame interface allows the respiratory mask to better accommodate a larger range of face shapes and sizes. Also, infinite adjustment allows the patient to have a larger range of motion when using the respiratory mask, while maintaining a comfortable and effective seal. The ball and socket joint 7285 is a familiar mechanism and visually simple to assemble so therefore more likely to be utilized effectively by patients.
In the illustrated embodiment, the socket 7210 is provided to the yoke 7255 (e.g., integrally formed in one piece therewith) and the ball 7240 is provided to the frame 7230 (e.g., integrally formed in one piece therewith). However, it should be appreciated that the opposite arrangement is possible, i.e., socket on frame and ball on yoke.
As illustrated, the socket 7210 on yoke 7255 is a cavity with a generally rounded profile. In an embodiment, the socket 7210 is in the shape of a hemisphere. In another embodiment, the socket 7210 is part of a hemisphere. The socket 7210 may have a lip 7215 on its outer edge as shown in
In an embodiment, the ball 7240 on frame 7230 may be generally spherical, elliptical, or any other rounded shape. In another embodiment, the ball 7240 may be part of a sphere or any rounded shape, e.g., a hemisphere. In yet another embodiment, the ball 7240 may be hollow or partly hollow.
In the illustrated embodiment, the ball 7240 may be engaged with the socket 7210 by a push fit. In an alternative embodiment, the ball 7240 may be engaged with the socket 7210 by a sliding connection. In an embodiment, the ball 7240 has the same or larger diameter D than that of socket 7210 for an interference fit (e.g.,
In another alternative embodiment, the frame and yoke may be integrally formed in one piece. In an embodiment, the frame and yoke may include different colors or transparencies with respect to one another.
In an embodiment, rotation indicators may be provided on the frame and/or yokes to indicate to the user that the frame can rotate relative to the yokes. In addition, the rotation indicators may function as position markings to indicate the frame's position with respect to the yokes, e.g., used as a reference for preferred naso-labial rotation angle.
For example, a series of markings (e.g., dots, arrows, combination of dots/arrows, etc.) may be provided on the frame that align with a position mark (e.g., line, dot, arrow, etc.) provided on the yokes to indicate the frame's position.
In
In
In
In each embodiment, the markings on the frame and yoke may be printed, molded, etched, polished, etc. Also, the markings on the frame and/or yoke may include other configurations (e.g., color-coded, numbered, varying sizes, bands with ascending heights, etc.). Markings may be provided on one or both sides of the frame, and markings may be provided on one or both of the yokes. In addition, any suitable number of markings may be provided on the frame and yoke, and the markings may have any suitable spacing.
In an embodiment, rotation indicators may be provided on the nasal prong assembly and/or yokes to indicate to the user that the nasal prong assembly/frame can rotate relative to the yokes. In addition, the rotation indicators may function as position markings to indicate the nasal prong assembly's position with respect to the yokes, e.g., used as a reference for preferred naso-labial rotation angle.
For example, a series of markings (e.g., dots, arrows, combination of dots/arrows, etc.) may be provided on the nasal prong assembly that align with a position mark (e.g., line, dot, arrow, etc.) provided on the yokes to indicate the nasal prong assembly's position.
As best shown in
Similar to the concepts shown in
Another advantage of this alignment concept is it indicates to the user that the nasal prong assembly should be positioned in the frame in such a way that the adjacent yoke 6555 with dot 6504 is aligned with dots 6025. This therefore indicates that the nasal prong assembly will be oriented so that it interfaces with the nares of the patient correctly, i.e., nasal prong assembly placed in the frame in the right direction. For example, if the patient interface was completely disassembled, it is obvious that the headgear straps are to be placed along the side of the face with the yokes facing outwards. The user would then proceed to connect the frame to the yokes (which can be put in either way and still work). The alignment dots on the nasal prong assembly can then be positioned so that they are on the side of the yoke with the alignment dot. This means the nasal prong assembly is in the right direction, i.e., with the largest side of the gusset touching the face of the user and the company logo facing outwards. Should the user attempt to align the nasal prong assembly in such a way that the alignment dots on the nasal prong assembly are over the yoke that does not have an alignment dot, the nasal prong assembly will be facing the wrong way, i.e., company logo touching the face of the user.
In each embodiment, the markings on the nasal prong assembly and yoke may be printed, molded, etched, polished, etc. Also, the markings on the nasal prong assembly and/or yoke may include other configurations (e.g., color-coded, numbered, varying sizes, bands with ascending heights, etc.). Markings may be provided on one or both sides of the nasal prong assembly, and markings may be provided on one or both of the yokes. In addition, any suitable number of markings may be provided on the nasal prong assembly and yoke, and the markings may have any suitable spacing.
In the embodiment of headgear yoke 5055 shown in
As shown in
The use of Velcro attachment at the headgear yokes eliminates the use of a rear buckle to adjust the rear strap 57. This arrangement improves comfort by removing discomfort and irritation caused by the patient lying on a rear buckle in use.
As shown in
In an embodiment, the slot may have a width of about 3-5 mm, e.g., 4 mm, and a length of about 15-25 mm, e.g., 21 mm. However, these dimensions and ranges are merely exemplary and other dimensions and ranges are possible depending on application.
Adjustment of Strap Length
Headgear Buckle
As shown in
The headgear buckle 60 joins the headgear straps and yokes to form the headgear, allows fine and infinite adjustments of the headgear straps, allows quick and easy adjustments and loosening of the headgear straps, and/or allows the straps to pull symmetrically against the head to minimize dislodgement of the nasal prong assembly during adjustment.
As noted above, the rear strap eliminates the use of a rear buckle and uses Velcro fasteners, e.g., to improve comfort. Alternative embodiments to eliminate or reduce discomfort that may be caused by a headgear buckle include: using an isolated highly elastic section that allows the user to easily stretch the headgear over the head to remove/replace it; reducing the overall height of the buckle (e.g., low profile buckle); adding padding to the buckle; allowing the user to customize the position of the buckle so that it can be located on an area of the head that will not cause irritation to the user (e.g., positioned along side regions of the head rather than at the back); and/or introducing a textile buckle that provides the same function as a plastic buckle; introducing a headgear material that provides the same function as a buckle.
Soft and Flexible Link
In an alternative embodiment, the headgear buckle may be in the form of a soft and flexible link (also referred to as a linking element, link element or link member). Such a link is disclosed in Australian Provisional Application No. AU 2008900891, filed Feb. 25, 2008, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The link provides a more comfortable linking element for headgear straps and has sufficient strength in tension to secure a mask to a patient's face under pressure.
In an embodiment of the link (see
The illustrated link 6134 is formed of a relatively soft and flexible material, preferably an elastomer, e.g., thermoplastic elastomer (TPE), and more preferably a thermoplastic polyester elastomer such as Hytrel™ by DuPont Corporation. Alternatively, the link may be constructed from a nylon or other material with sufficient strength and flexibility. The link may be made by any suitable method, for example by molding.
The illustrated link 6134 may be elongate in the dimension which is adapted to lie parallel to the strap length, and may be approximately elliptical in plan view as illustrated (see
The link is thin (e.g., less than about 3 mm, and more preferably about 0.75 to 2.5 mm thick) in its smallest transverse dimension, and mostly generally planar in its unflexed state. Preferably, the link is symmetrical both end-to-end and about a central longitudinal plane, to facilitate assembly and reassembly of the headgear without needing to have regard to the orientation of the link. In an embodiment, the link has a thickness less than the strap thickness.
The link 6134 has opposed end portions 6136, a pair of transverse strap-receiving slots 6140 and a central portion 6142 between and adjacent the slots. By including a pair of slots 6140 rather than a single slot, the headgear straps are less prone to skewing in use.
The link of
In the illustrated embodiment, the end portions 6136 (which correspond substantially with that part of the link which is overlaid by the strap in use) are approximately 1 mm thick.
The illustrated link further includes a pair of parallel 19 mm by 3 mm transverse slots 6140 spaced apart by about 3 mm, and a reinforced central portion 6142 adjacent the slots.
It should be appreciated that the link may be adapted for use with headgear straps of other suitable length, width, and thickness, e.g., size of slots in link may be sized accordingly to accommodate any suitable size headgear strap.
In the illustrated embodiment, the central portion 6142 is strengthened by being thickened relative to the end portions 6136. The reinforced central portion 6142 may comprise an I-shaped thicker region of 2 mm thickness. The center bar 6144 of the I-shape is located between the two slots and the cross bars 6146 of the I-shape are located between the ends of the slots 6140 and the side edge of the link, and taper down in thickness towards their ends.
It will be appreciated that the central portion 6142 may strengthened in ways other than by increased thickness, for example by co-molding with different materials, or attachment or inclusion of reinforcing members.
The thickest portion of the link and straps in use is a double thickness of strap together with a thickness of the end portions 6136. By providing a reinforced, thickened central portion 6142, the linking element is strengthened without contributing to the overall thickness of the assembly of straps and link, since the straps do not wrap around the central portion in use. See
As can be seen in
The link 6134 and strap 6130 are thus adapted to connect together by the strap making a single pass through the link and forming a U-shape with both legs of the U parallel to the adjacent surface of the patient's head.
The thicker portion 6144 of the link 6134 preferably has a thickness of less than two strap thicknesses, and does not protrude beyond the combined thickness of the doubled-over strap connected to the link.
In this arrangement, the overall thickness of the strap arrangement is approximately a double thickness of strap. This contrasts with prior art arrangements where more than a double thickness of strap is located on the head, for example using a ladder lock, leading to an uncomfortable bulk to lie on. See
In accordance with a preferred form of the present invention, a length of hook & loop material (e.g., Velcro™) is used to secure an end of a strap to itself and to retain the strap in tension.
The rounded corners of the linking element (see for example
The illustrated arrangement is intended to allow a lower link profile and provide increased comfort to the patient, while retaining the ease of adjustment of current link member designs.
While the illustrated embodiment of the invention is a flexible linking element, other forms may be more rigid, or completely rigid.
Such flexible linking element may be used to removably and adjustably couple upper or top strap portions of headgear (e.g., similar to buckle 60 in
A mask assembly in accordance with an embodiment of the invention provides stability to the interface through a combination of components referred to as “headgear”. The headgear may be broadly described as comprising a pair of side portions including cheek & upper/crown portions and a rear portion. In the preferred embodiment, the cheek portions include stabilizing features or “yokes”. Furthermore, as discussed above naso-labial angular adjustment is provided via a yoke to frame connection mechanism.
As shown in
Each side strap 53 includes an upper strap portion 53(1) that passes over the top of the patient's head. The upper strap portions 53(1) of the side straps 53 are coupled to one another by a headgear buckle 60. The rear strap 57 includes end portions 57(1) coupled to respective headgear yoke 55.
The upper strap portions 53(1) are structured to adjust the sealing force because they pull the nasal prong assembly 20 up into the patient's nose. The rear strap 57 is structured to adjust the stability of the nasal prong assembly 20 because it pulls the nasal prong assembly 20 back into the patient's face on the top lip of the patient.
The headgear 50 captures the crown of the patient's head (when assembled) while avoiding the base of the neck, accommodates a sufficient range of adjustment to cover a broad range of the target population, and/or provides sufficient flexibility for removal of the interface without requiring readjustment. In an embodiment, the headgear 50 may be provided in multiple sizes (e.g., small, medium, large).
In another embodiment as shown in
Each side portion 5052 includes a side strap 5053 (e.g., constructed of Breathoprene) and a headgear yoke 5055 (e.g., constructed of hard plastic such as Nylon, Hytrel) attached to the side strap 5053. The headgear yoke 5055 (also referred to as a rigidizer, rigidizing element, stabilizer, stabilizing element, stiffener, stiffened headgear element) acts as a stiffener or rigidizer to add rigidity to the headgear and add stability to the sides. The rear portion 5054 includes a rear strap 5057 (e.g., constructed of Breathoprene) that passes around a rear portion of the patient's head (e.g., below the occiput).
Each side strap 5053 includes an upper strap portion 5053(1) that passes over the top of the patient's head. The upper strap portions 5053(1) of the side straps 5053 are coupled to one another by a headgear buckle 5060 (e.g., constructed of hard plastic such as Nylon, Hytrel). The rear strap 5057 includes end portions 5057(1) coupled to respective headgear yoke 5055.
Specifically,
The headgear yoke 6555L, 6555R is substantially similar to the headgear yoke 5655 described above (e.g., see
In the illustrated embodiment, the upper strap portion 6553(1) and the front strap portion 6553(2) are formed in one piece, and the rear strap portion 6553(3) is attached to the upper and front strap portions by stitching (e.g., stitch joint indicated at 6556). However, the rear strap portion 6553(3) may be provided to the upper and front strap portions in other suitable manners, e.g., formed in one piece therewith, attached via adhesive, attached via mechanical connector, etc.
As illustrated, the free end of each rear strap portion 6553(3) includes a Velcro® fastener or tab of hook material 6557. In addition, one side of each rear strap portion 6553(3) is coated with un-broken loop (UBL) material 6558 (e.g., instead of lycra) which allows the tab of hook material 6557 to fasten anywhere along its length. The tab of hook material 6557 provides an “easy peel” arrangement wherein only a portion of the tab of hook material 6557 engages with the UBL material 6558 making it easier to grip.
In use, the upper strap portions 6553(1) of the side straps 6553L, 6553R may coupled to one another by a top headgear buckle or link, and the rear strap portions 6553(3) of the side straps 6553L, 6553R may be coupled to one another by a rear headgear buckle or link.
For example,
In the illustrated embodiment, the headgear yoke is formed separately from the frame and attached thereto. In an alternative embodiment, the headgear yoke may be integrally formed with the frame so that the frame and headgear yoke provide a one-piece structure.
The headgear may provide one or more of the following functions: support and stabilize the nasal prong assembly on the user in a manner that maintains the integrity of the nasal prong seal around the naris region during the delivery of pressurized air; allow the user to adjust and set the nasal prong to a desired position to obtain and maintain an “exact fit” with a good nasal prong seal around the naris region during the delivery of pressurized air; accommodate an anthropometrically diverse range of users (e.g., 95% of male and female population); accommodate a range of different sleeping positions and transitions in sleeping positions including the ability to support different tube mounting configurations (e.g., allow patient to sleep on side without the barrel-like base and/or prongs being dislodged); allow the user to remove and replace the interface without significant loosening of the adjustment mechanisms; ergonomically comfortable and not a source of marking or irritation to the user; unobtrusive and both visually and physically minimal avoiding the user feeling stifled or claustrophobic; allow the user to wear glasses with the interface; aesthetically pleasing, high quality and stylish; provide a region, or regions, for the application of branding; allow user to easily assemble/disassemble from the nasal prong assembly; and/or allow user to easily fit and remove from head.
In the illustrated embodiment, each of the headgear straps may be constructed of Breathoprene including an open cell polyurethane laminated between Lycra outer layers. In alternative embodiments, the nap of the outer layer material may be altered, the density of the core material may be altered, and/or the color of the individual materials may be altered.
For example, each of the straps may be constructed of micro-fiber nylon (e.g., Tattel), which may provide a relatively soft edge and feel.
However, other suitable materials are possible. In an embodiment, the straps have a material thickness of about 2-3 mm, e.g., 2.5 mm.
In another embodiment, the straps may be constructed of a more elastic headgear material to increase decoupling of headgear forces such that shifts in the headgear position does not significantly influence the seal region.
In an embodiment, an intermediate strap portion 5053(2) of each side strap 5053 (e.g., see
As best shown in
As best shown in
Velcro Tab
As shown in
In an embodiment, the Velcro tab 5059 may be ultrasonically welded to the rear strap. For example, the Velcro tab 5059 may be ultrasonically welded in two locations (see
Each headgear yoke 55 is constructed from a rigid or semi-rigid material (e.g., injection molded from nylon, polypropylene, polycarbonate, etc.) and attached to a respective side strap 53. The yokes 55 retain at least a partial portion of the basic shape of the headgear 50, which may facilitate donning of the headgear 50.
As shown in
The headgear yokes 55 provide rigidity for stabilizing the interface and flexibility for comfort (when assembled), provide a flexible stiffening section for the headgear straps, form a retaining interface with the first end portion (yoke ring), and/or provide alignment markers to correspond to the correct front-to-back orientation of the nasal prong assembly.
Yoke to Strap Attachment
Each yoke 55 may be attached to a respective side strap 53, e.g., via stitching, welding, gluing, or otherwise mechanically affixed.
In an embodiment, each yoke 55 may be attached to a respective strap 53 with glue, e.g., Loctite (e.g. 4011 medical grade). In such arrangement, the glue may be provided along a glue path that is spaced inwardly from the side edges of the strap 53 (e.g., 1-5 mm).
In other embodiments, each yoke 55 may be attached to a respective strap 53 with double-sided tape, hot melt glue, and/or the application of heat (non glue).
In another embodiment, a sleeve may be created in the side strap 53, and the yoke 55 may be inserted into such sleeve.
In yet another embodiment, a yoke or rigidizing section may be provided to a respective strap by a manufacturing process. For example, a thermoforming process may be used to form a one-piece strap with a rigidizing section. In such embodiment, a relatively thick strap may be provided, and then pressure and/or heat may be applied to the strap in certain sections to add the desired rigidity. In an embodiment, the strap may be constructed of a foam material that would allow features to be created in the foam during manufacturing, e.g., seal ring, branding, etc.
In a further illustrated embodiment, each yoke 5055 is attached to a respective side strap 5053 via stitching. As shown in
The stitching groove 5058 locates the stitching making it flush with the top surface of the yoke, improves aesthetics by providing an overall cleaner appearance, provides a single stitching line to improve comfort levels through reducing edge stiffness of the headgear strap edge (e.g., potentially reducing facial marks), and provides path having sufficient level of attachment and stability. Also, the recessed structure of the stitching groove 5058 provides a thinner yoke wall section (e.g., see
It should be appreciated that each yoke 5055 may be attached to a respective side strap 5053 in other suitable manners, e.g., via welding, gluing, or otherwise mechanically affixed.
Yoke Width
In the illustrated embodiment, the yoke 55 includes a width that is less than a width of the respective side strap 53, e.g., intermediate portion 55(3) narrower than side strap 53.
If stitching is not used to attach the yoke 55 to the respective strap 53 (e.g., yoke attached via welding or gluing), the intermediate portion 55(3) may be even narrower.
However, in an alternative embodiment, the intermediate portion 55(3) may have a width that is substantially the same as the respective strap 53.
In alternative embodiments, the width of the yoke may be tapered or contoured along its length. For example,
In yet another embodiment, as shown in
In a further illustrated embodiment, the yoke 5055 includes a width (e.g., about 9 mm) that is less than a width of the respective side strap 5053 (e.g., about 19 mm), e.g., intermediate portion 5055(3) narrower than side strap 5053. As described above, such arrangement may eliminate or reduce facial marks in use.
For example,
Materials and Properties of Stabiliser/Yoke
First Forms
As noted above, each headgear yoke 55 is constructed from a rigid or semi-rigid material, e.g., nylon, polypropylene, polycarbonate.
In an embodiment, the yoke 55 is sufficiently soft and flexible so that it can bend or conform to suit the patient's head, and sufficiently rigid to efficiently transfer headgear forces/vectors for locating the nasal prong assembly 20 on the patient's face.
In another embodiment, the yoke 55 may be rubber like, e.g., constructed from Santoprene silicon material or thermoplastic. In another embodiment, silicon may be overmolded onto the yokes.
In yet another embodiment, headgear straps may not be provided along the yokes 55, e.g., straps only provided to cup the patient's head. Alternatively, yokes may not be provided.
In yet another embodiment, a flexible connection between the yoke and frame may be provided by an extension of the silicone seal rings, e.g., to increase decoupling of headgear forces.
In yet another embodiment, a metal component may be inserted in headgear straps around the yoke region to provide stiffness and to allow the user to customize the headgear region to the shape of the patient's face, e.g., in-molded stainless steel wire. In other forms this insert may be constructed from a malleable plastic or TPE.
Alternative Forms—Thermoformed Foam Yoke
In
In an embodiment, the seal ring 3156 and buckle 3160 may be provided to the yoke 3155 via a thermoformed foam sandwhich. For example,
This embodiment provides increased levels of usability (e.g., particularly during fitting and adjustment) for intuitive features such as single piece 3D shaped headgear and lateral headgear tension adjustments.
Also, this embodiment provides an increased level of aesthetics as it utilizes a thermoformed foam section, which provides broad opportunities for aesthetic styling. In
Branding
Branding may be molded and/or printed onto the yokes 55, and such branding may also function as an aid for correct alignment during assembly. The branding may include changes in color/tone.
Alternative Headgear Yoke
In
In
In
Flexible Yoke/Incorporated Seal Ring
In
In
In
In
Foam Section Attached to Yoke
In
The viscoelastic foam section 3490 provides a “high comfort” material around the sensitive cheek bone (zygomatic) region of the patient's face, which appears to be one of the primary sources of discomfort for headgear.
Also, this embodiment provides increased levels of usability (e.g., particularly during fitting and adjustment) for intuitive features such as single piece 3D shaped headgear and lateral headgear tension adjustments.
Silicone/Thermoplastic Foam Attached to Yoke
In
The silicone/thermoplastic foam section 3590 provides a “high comfort” material around the sensitive cheek bone (zygomatic) region of the patient's face, which appears to be one of the primary sources of discomfort for headgear.
Also, this embodiment provides increased levels of usability (e.g., particularly during fitting and adjustment) for intuitive features such as single piece 3D shaped headgear and lateral headgear tension adjustments.
As shown in
The yokes 5055 include one or more of the following functions: attach headgear to the frame, provide stability and support to the frame and nasal prong assembly during use, provide a yoke to frame interface, retain the frame during use, easy assembly/disassembly from the frame, rotate relative to the frame and allow adjustment to suit nasolabial angle, durability (e.g., 12 months or more), wide fit range (e.g., 95% of male and female population), visually minimal and unobtrusive, comfortable, provide a region, or regions, for the application of branding, and/or ease-of-use.
The yokes 5055 are structured and designed to improve visual integration and simple clean lines and forms. For example, the contoured form of each yoke breaks up flat faces to create highlight/shadow line and give an overall smaller impression. The single stitch and recessed groove used to attach the yoke to the respective strap provides a clean, streamlined form when assembled. The second end portion of the yoke is structured to leave minimum edges to lift away from the headgear strap if glued. The overall size of the yoke may be dictated by the various functions of the yoke to frame interface, e.g., minimum overall size and width while providing torque and rotation, retention of frame, and sufficient strength in area between yoke to frame and yoke to headgear strap.
In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, cheek supports 62 are provided (e.g., see
The first end portion 55(1) also includes a curved protrusion in the form of a cheek support 62 that curves forward or inwardly of the yoke ring 56. The cheek support 62 is attached to an end portion 63 of the side strap 53 (e.g., via stitching, glue, etc.) as shown in
The cheek support 62 provides a feature which both cushions against the cheeks and hugs the face evenly without introducing pressure points. This arrangement may reduce the strap tension required to maintain a seal and optimize patient comfort. Thus, the positioning of the cheek supports 62 on the headgear yokes 55 should discourage the user from applying excess headgear tension or over-tightening of the headgear, which can force the nasal prongs to compress into the naris region and affect sealing effectiveness.
The cheek supports 62 effectively takes the prongs' responsibility to provide stability to the mask system. The prongs can hence work almost independently to the supplied headgear tension, focusing on its own expansion to provide a secure seal.
As shown in
In addition, the cheek support 62 and/or brackets 64 may help to reduce tube drag which can cause undesired shifting of the frame and/or affect sealing stability.
As shown in
The cheek support 5084 follows the cheek contour and is adapted to engage or hug the patient's cheek to provide a stable cheek support and hence provide additional support to the patient interface. That is, the cheek support 5084 stably supports the nasal prong assembly 4020 in position and retains overall sealing stability.
The cheek support 5084 is adapted to rest on the cheeks of the patient in use, e.g., below the cheek bone. Benefits of this location include one or more of the following: soft skin which is pliable, not sensitive, cheek bone support structure, and/or unobtrusive location.
The curvature of the cheek support 5084 may be determined from anthropometric analysis to provide a good fit for a wide range of patient head sizes. In the illustrated embodiment, the cheek support 5084 is raised vertically on the cheek (e.g., by about 2 mm with respect to the cheek support 62 described above) to provide preferred stability and comfort for this embodiment of the patient interface.
In an embodiment, the cheek support 5084 may be flexible in order to conform to the contours of the patient's face. Such flexibility may be provided by the selected material and/or thickness of the cheek support (e.g., 1.2 mm nylon material), and/or the cantilever arrangement of the cheek support (e.g., 22 mm cantilever arm) which may be locally narrowed to aid flexibility.
In an embodiment, as shown in
The cheek supports 5084 provide a three-dimensional gripping mechanism, for sufficient comfort and mask stability, may allow less headgear tension to seal the nasal prongs, and/or may help to reduce tube drag which can cause undesired shifting of the frame and/or affect sealing stability. Moreover, the cheek supports 5084 isolate seal forces from stability forces, so that headgear tension is applied to the cheek supports rather than to the upper lip and/or to the prongs (preventing the prongs from being compressed).
In alternative embodiments, more than one cheek support may be provided, and/or the one or more cheek supports may be provided at different angles.
The support arm 5080 supports the yoke to frame interface 5085 on the yoke 5055. Moreover, the support arm 5080 provides support and stability of the frame 5030 and nasal prong assembly 5020 attached thereto.
As shown in
As shown in
Along with the differing structural shape along its length, the wall section in the support arm 5080 is thicker than the wall section in the remaining portions of the yoke 5055 (e.g., wall section of support arm 5080 increases from about 1.2 mm (primary part wall thickness) to about 1.5 mm) to provide further rigidity.
The rounded, outwardly facing surface 5080.1 of the support arm 5080 (see
The headgear 50 and/or nasal prong assembly 20 may include structure to improve stability. For example, such structure may increase friction with the patient's face, and the added friction enhances stability of the mask system on the patient's face in use.
Wider Headgear Straps
In an embodiment, the width of the headgear straps may be increased (e.g., with respect to ResMed's Swift mask) in order to increase the friction provided by the headgear straps. That is, the straps may be wider to increase the contact area with the patient's face, which provides more friction. The added friction increases stability which improves comfort. In addition, the wider straps may help to reduce irritation to the patient's cheeks.
In an alternative embodiment, the width of the yoke may be thinner in order to increase the width of the strap on each side of the yoke.
Reduction of Headgear Marking/Irritation
An increase in strap width on a side of the yoke may also help to reduce headgear “cheek mark”.
In the illustrated embodiment, the headgear closely follows the profile of the patient's face and “hugs” the cheek region. The Breathoprene straps provide sufficient contact area and friction to stabilize the interface and the yokes function as a rigid element that retain the shape of the headgear.
A common side effect with known headgear is “cheek mark”, which is a temporary marking left along the side of the patient's face and cheek region upon removing the interface, after an extended period of wearing. This region R is displayed in
According to an embodiment of the present invention, the amount of headgear strap material on a side of the yoke facing inwardly (i.e., towards the patient's nose) may be increased to reduce facial marks left by the headgear.
Alternative embodiments to eliminate or reduce facial marks occurring on the cheeks include: reducing the density of the headgear strap material; introducing a softer strap surface material; introducing a highly compliant element to the inside surface of the strap, removing the sharp 90° edge that sits up against the face (e.g., change profile of edge); improving lateral flexibility of the strap and yoke; altering the way in which the yokes interface with the frame; imbedding a component or material that provides the function of the yokes within a soft padded outer layer (e.g., a “sock” like padded outer layer); introducing a material that provides flexibility along a single plane/direction (e.g., it will flex and contour to the shape of the face while providing a rigidizer function along an adjustment plane); eliminating the stitching used to hold the yokes; adding a layer of 3 mm or 4 mm flocking to the inside of the strap; raising the headgear straps off of the face along the cheek region so that it is only making contact on the upper lip and side of head; introducing a molded foam component that is transfer molded to a plastic headgear component; reducing the overall material thickness of the headgear straps; using a thin textile, e.g., linen, rather than a plastic and foam component (e.g., this arrangement may reduce the overall height of the straps); and/or constructing the headgear from a thin textile that is stiffened in an isolated region to provide the rigidizing function currently fulfilled by the yokes (e.g., stiffening may be provided by impregnating the material with an epoxy (e.g., screen-printing)).
Also, alternative embodiments to eliminate or reduce marking/irritation occurring on the upper ear lobes include: introducing a lower density strap material; altering the geometry of the headgear to avoid the ears completely; using a softened rounded edge material or soft padded component where the headgear contacts the ears; providing headgear that sits over the sides of the ears (e.g., headphone style); incorporating a rotational adjustment for the back strap so that the strap can be positioned to clear the ears; using the ears as a point of location/stability (e.g., eye glasses) which may aid in correctly locating the interface or improving overall stability; and/or eliminating the back strap to avoid the ears.
Friction Pads Provided to Headgear
In another embodiment, a friction pad may be provided to the headgear to increase friction. For example,
In an embodiment, such friction pad 1270 may be retrofit to ResMed's Swift headgear. For example,
Friction Pads Provided to Nasal Prong Assembly
In another embodiment, a friction pad may be provided to the nasal prong assembly to increase friction. For example,
In embodiments, the wings may extend from the base of the nasal prong assembly or the wings may extend from the frame.
Foam Padding Provided to Headgear
In another embodiment, foam padding may be provided to the headgear to increase friction. For example,
As shown in
In an alternative embodiment, as shown in
In alternative embodiments, additional support and stability to the seal region may be provided by wings or straps that sit under the mouth or below the chin in use (e.g., chin pad, chin strap).
For example, an exemplary chin strap may follow the plane of the headgear straps/yokes to run down and under the chin, and such chin strap may also support a secondary function of holding the mouth closed.
In another embodiment, a loop may contact the patient's face around the nose to provide addition support to the seal region.
Other embodiments to improve headgear stability includes: provide additional support through adhering the silicone nasal prongs to the skin; provide additional support through increasing contact between the prong and the patient's top lip; provide additional support through introducing an inflatable hood to the prongs that expands up against the walls of the nasal passage to hold the interface in place; provide additional support through a silicone skeleton that lies across the upper lip and cheek bone region which may eliminate all rigid plastic elements from the face (e.g., headgear may no longer have to function to hold the seal in as this is facilitated by the skeleton, rather the headgear functions only to hold the skeleton against the face); provide gel padding that sits against the face; and/or provide a mouthpiece that holds the frame in place.
Crown Portion
Crown Strap Style Headgear
In
In
In
Rear Strap Portion
Alternative Headgear Materials
In
In
In
Removable Foam Sock
In
The foam sock 3392 provides a “high comfort” material around the sensitive cheek bone (zygomatic) region of the patient's face, which appears to be one of the primary sources of discomfort for headgear.
Tube Retainer
A tube retainer or retaining strap (not shown) may be provided to an upper strap portion 53(1) to retain the air delivery tube when in an upward position along the side of the patient's head (e.g., tube retainer wraps around both the tube and strap portion or buckle). An exemplary tube retainer is described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,318,437 and U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2006-0137690, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
In the illustrated embodiment, the tube retainer 6361 is integrally formed in one-piece (e.g., cut from headgear material (e.g., Breath-O-Prene™) or other suitable soft and flexible material) with the second strap portion 6361(2) extending transverse to the first strap portion 6361(1). As illustrated, the second strap portion 6361(2) is thinner than the first strap portion 6361(1), and each strap portion includes a Velcro® tab 6362 adapted to secure the respective loop in position. The first strap portion 6361(1) tapers towards respective ends, and includes a tab 6363 to facilitate connection with the second strap portion 6361(2).
In an alternative embodiment, a tube retainer or retaining strap may be provided to headgear to retain the air delivery tube in a position over the top of the patient's head (i.e., tube runs over the head as opposed to along the side of the head). This arrangement allows the patient to assume different sleep positions, e.g., sleeping on side head, back of head, etc.
For example, a tube retainer or retaining clip may be provided to a headgear buckle (e.g., in the position of headgear buckle 60 shown in
In the illustrated embodiment, the tube retainer 5561 (
The tube retainer 5561 has two buttons 5561.6 at its distal end that may be resiliently pressed together to align the tongues 5561.7 together. Once aligned, the buttons 5561.6 may be engaged with the opening 5560.1 on the headgear buckle 5560 by releasing the buttons 5561.6 and allowing them to flex into the opening 5560.1. This mechanically locks the tube retainer 5561 with the headgear buckle 5560, and allows the tube retainer 5561 to rotate relative to the headgear buckle 5560. However, alternative methods of fixation may be used, e.g., buttons engaged with respective grooves on the buckle, adhesives.
As illustrated, the headgear buckle 5560 includes opposing locking portions 5560.2 adapted to be removably and adjustably coupled with respective headgear straps, e.g., headgear strap may be wrapped around the cross-bar of the associated locking portion in a known manner.
Also, the tube retainer 5561 may be rotated relative to the headgear buckle 5560 to adjust its position. A detent assembly assists in restraining the tube retainer 5561 at the desired position, and provides tactile feedback with the motion of the tube retainer 5561. Specifically, the opening 5560.1 of the buckle 5560 includes detents 5560.3 that interact with projections 5561.8 provided on each of the buttons 5561.6 of the tube retainer 5561. In addition, the buckle 5560 includes a series of recesses 5560.4 that interact with projections 5561.9 provided on the underside of the tube retainer 5561. As the tube retainer 5561 is rotated or adjusted, the projections 5561.8, 5561.9 of the tube retainer 5561 will move into and out of engagement with respective detents 5560.3/recesses 5560.4 of the buckle 5560. The projections 5561.8, 5561.9 will be seated within respective detents 5560.3/recesses 5560.4 to assist in restraining the tube retainer 5561 at the desired position.
Alternative Tube Retainers and Buckles
In each embodiment, the tube retainer is structured to stabilize the air delivery tube increasing the opportunity for an effective seal to form. The stabilization of the air delivery tube will also enhance patient comfort by allowing for a larger range of sleeping positions and reducing the incidence of irritation caused by tubing interference.
The tube retainer is a structure designed to maintain the air delivery tube in a fixed position. The tube retainer may be formed from any semi-rigid or rigid material such as Hytrel, HTPC.
The buckle is a joining member between two headgear straps that allows the tension in the headgear to be adjusted (e.g., in the position of headgear buckle 60 shown in
In the embodiments described below, each tube retainer 7100 (
Buckle
As shown in
In an embodiment, each buckle 7000 may have a height H, e.g., 2 mm, as shown in
Strap Locks
In an embodiment, the strap locks 7040 on the buckle 7000 may have a cutout in the middle or anywhere along its longest side to form gap 7041 and teeth 7042 as demonstrated in
Keyhole
The keyhole 7060 may be located in the center of the buckle 7000, however it may also be located at other suitable locations on the buckle, e.g., offset from the center of the buckle.
The keyhole 7060 may have a general key shape as shown in
The keyhole 7060 may also have one or more additional holes 7065 about the keyhole 7060 as shown in
The additional holes 7065 are provided to allow spring or resilient flexibility during engagement of the tube retainer 7100 with the keyhole 7060 and also during rotation of the tube retainer 7100 when engaged with the keyhole 7060. Adjusting the length of holes 7065 will alter the spring properties and thus ease of engagement and disengagement and also rotation of the tube retainer 7100 with the buckle 7000.
In an embodiment, a locking collar 7070 may be provided around keyhole 7060 (see
Tube Retainer
As shown in
Arms
In the illustrated embodiments, each tube retainer 7100 has two arms 7130 each with a generally rounded curvature. In an embodiment, the arms 7130 may be generally circular as shown in
In an embodiment, a rib 7140 may be provided to the base of the arms 7130 (as shown in
In an embodiment, the arms 7130 may have a locking mechanism 7135 that operates with a ball and clasp type joint (e.g., see
In another embodiment, the upper ends of the arms 7130 may include a lead-in 7150 as shown in
The inner radius of the arms 7130 may also be provided with one or more ribs 7131 as shown in
Tab
In the illustrated embodiments, each tube retainer 7100 has a tab 7160 at its base that is structured to engage with a keyhole 7060 provided to the buckle 7000.
In an embodiment, the tab 7160 may be generally round as shown in
In yet another embodiment, the tab 7160 may have a lip 7165 extending from its distal end as shown in
In an embodiment, the tab 7160 may also have a joining ridge 7166 at its proximal end as shown in
Other alternatives to increase headgear flexibility to accommodate different sleep positions includes: integrate tubing into headgear through conduit system; and/or introduce an elbow that accommodates a wider range of movement through a ball and socket joint. The ball and socket joint elbow may also provide decoupling of forces due to shifts in tube position.
Other alternatives to increase decoupling of forces due to shifts in tube position include: provide a tube that has increased levels of flexibility in the axial directions; interrupt tube with highly flexible element (i.e., thin silicone element) below elbow; provide a tube that is constructed from an overall sifter material; and/or provide a tube that is constructed from an overall more lightweight material.
Headgear Cost Reduction
To reduce the cost of the headgear, the headgear may incorporate one or more of the following: replace textile components with molded components; reduce part count for headgear; reduce materials used in headgear; reduce labor involved in assembling headgear; increase mechanization of assembly process; and/or new material cutting profile to reduce wastage.
Reducing Headgear Presence
Alternative embodiments to reduce the perceived presence of headgear (e.g., headgear made to feel more minimal/lightweight, provide minimal skin contact, and provide low intrusion into the field of view to reduce the likelihood of claustrophobia) include: providing a completely elastic headgear strap design; reducing the overall amount of skin contact that the headgear has with the user; introducing a skin toned or transparent headgear (e.g., chameleon headgear); eliminating all hard plastic components such as buckles and yokes; introducing cotton as the skin contact material (e.g., cotton may be better on skin and may be more synonymous with clothing); using a cup or parachute material section to capture the crown (e.g., a net like section that may be made from cotton); reducing the overall material thickness of all parts of the headgear; using two or three thin (e.g., 1 mm) wire-style strips of nylon to connect the frame to the headgear body (e.g., this arrangement may accommodate fine adjustments and may have a very fine appearance on the user, and this arrangement may be incorporated into a net style headgear which would appear almost invisible amongst the user's hair); eliminating the headgear and replacing its function with balloon style pillows that inflate up against the walls of the nasal passage to hold the pillows in place; and/or using an internal mouth guard which has magnets incorporated into it that will hold the pillow and frame assembly up against the upper lip and in position to retain a good seal (e.g., this arrangement may be incorporated with a balloon style prong system to completely eliminate the headgear).
Headgear Usability
Alternative embodiments to reduce the number/complexity of adjustments to achieve a correct fit/good seal include: introducing a single piece headgear that is highly flexible and provides sufficient breathability; introducing a highly flexible net style headgear system to capture the crown; and/or eliminating buckles and introducing a headgear that uses a simpler series of adjustment mechanisms.
Alternative embodiments to improve the intuitiveness of headgear adjustment include: introducing a 3D shape headgear that provides an obvious visual cue as to the correct fitting of the headgear; positioning the adjustment mechanisms closer to the region influenced by the adjustments (e.g., seal region) such that adjustments are more intuitive; introducing Velcro tabs that provide a more intuitive method of adjustment; and/or utilizing large Velcro tab sections as rigidizing elements to replace headgear yokes.
Alternative embodiments to improve the “set and forget” functionality of headgear (e.g., no need to reset/readjust after removal of headgear) include: incorporating a highly flexible element at points on the headgear that allow stretching to be isolated to aid rapid removal/replacement of headgear; and/or increasing the flexibility of the nasal pillows to accommodate the rapid removal/replacement of headgear.
Alternative embodiments to reduce the overall number of headgear parts include: providing single part headgear (e.g., textile or molded headgear); introducing Velcro tabs rather than having separate buckles; over-molding/insert molding the seal rings into the yokes; making the seal ring and yoke a single part; and/or utilizing large Velcro tab sections as rigidizing elements to replace the headgear yokes.
Alternative embodiments to improve ease of assembly/disassembly include: reducing overall number of parts; incorporating features that prevent disassembly (e.g., one time assembly); improving intuitiveness of assembly and disassembly (e.g., through color coding or physical locators/indicators); reducing the overall number of “open ends” (e.g., eliminate back buckle); introducing 2-tone headgear (e.g., different color on the inside surface to the outside surface which may reduce incidents of incorrect assembly in manufacturing; eliminating seal rings; and/or providing one-way assembly of headgear through headgear buckles (e.g., restricted by geometry).
Alternative embodiments to improve ease of cleaning all surfaces include: reducing overall number of parts; making headgear suitable for thermal disinfection so that the interface does not have to be completely disassembled to disinfect; and/or eliminating textile headgear (e.g., replace textile headgear with an elastomeric or thermoplastic material that does not collect oil and moisture which may allow the headgear to be wiped down as with other components of the interface and may increase durability).
Alternative embodiments to increase the overall durability of headgear include: eliminating textile headgear (e.g., replace textile headgear with an elastomeric or thermoplastic material that does not collect oil and moisture which may allow the headgear to be wiped down as with other components of the interface and may increase durability); reducing the need for adjustment; reducing the overall number of parts (e.g., interfacing parts); and/or creating headgear straps out of a single material structure rather than a laminated one (e.g., foam only headgear straps).
Headgear Alternatives
Mechanical Hinge
In
In
Headgear Without “Dog Ear” Style Straps
In
In
In
In
Incremental Lateral Adjustment
In
This embodiment provides increased levels of usability (e.g., particularly during fitting and adjustment) for intuitive features such as single piece 3D shaped headgear and lateral headgear tension adjustments.
Headgear stability may be improved by eliminating dislodging of the headgear on the head and/or capturing the crown region of the head.
Exemplary headgear embodiments for improving stability include: provide additional support around the head through a secondary strap which runs under the ears; provide additional support around the head through capturing the crown region with different headgear geometry; provide additional support around the head through one size fits all crown cap or a single piece of material that sits over the crown of the head (e.g., may be perforated to allow breathing or take the form of a netted section of material, may also take the form of a two strap parachute style headgear); increase stability of headgear through the incorporation of a high friction material such as textured rubber or textile (e.g., Velcro); increase stability through use of more silicone parts against the skin as this has a high friction coefficient; and/or alter the way in which the headgear captures the crown, e.g., sits further forward on the head and has a strap that runs along one plane to capture the crown (this aids in clearance of the ear lobes, etc.).
Headgear Properties
Each headgear embodiment described above may include one or more features to increase headgear fitting range, improve headgear comfort, reduce headgear cost, improve headgear aesthetics, and/or increase prominence of branding.
For example, headgear embodiments may increase overall comfort by eliminating potential ergonomic hotspots, eliminating sources of marking/irritation, creating a lightweight feel, and/or maintaining high levels of material breathability. Headgear embodiments may be designed in a manner that deviates from a “medical product” aesthetic but reflects a “lifestyle product” aesthetic, and creates a higher quality looking product overall. Also, headgear embodiments may incorporate and support more prominent branding through optimal branding locations and increased differentiation of branding from the surrounding material.
Additional embodiments may be generated by combining one or more features of any one of the above-described embodiments with one or more features of the other of the above-described embodiments. Such additional embodiments may include one or more of the following features:
Stability
Comfort
Usability
Unobtrusiveness
Aesthetics and Branding
Cleaning/Maintenance
Elbow
As shown in
The elbow 5040 is structured to provide easy assembly/disassembly to the frame, rotation with respect to the frame with acceptable level of torque, seal, and venting. In addition, the elbow directs air into the patient interface without significant flow restrictions.
In an embodiment of the elbow (see
As illustrated, the second portion 5044 tapers to a smaller internal diameter at D5 (e.g., about 13.5 mm), e.g., for sealing the lip 5075.1 of the tube against surface 5048 (e.g., see
In the illustrated embodiment, the first portion 5042 is angled about 90° with respect to the second portion 5044. This arrangement provides a low profile in use, e.g., 90° elbow and attached tubing does not stick outwardly when rotated, reduces mask size. In addition, the 90° elbow provides a quieter venting arrangement and is easier to tool/manufacture with a 90° flat blank at the surface for the vent hole pins. However, the first and second portions of the elbow may have other suitable angles with respect to one another, e.g., 120°. In an alternative embodiment, the elbow may include one or more baffles along its interior.
Frame Attachment
The first portion 5042 of the elbow 5040 includes a tapered retaining portion 5043.1, a circumferential flange 5043.2, and a circumferential rib 5043.3 between the retaining portion 5043.1 and the flange 5043.2. The first portion 5042 is engageable with the tube portion 5035 of the frame 5030. The tube portion 5035 include an inwardly facing circumferential rib 5035.1 at an inner end and an inwardly facing circumferential sealing lip 5035.2 at an outer end (e.g., see
The first portion 5042 of the elbow 5040 is inserted into the tube portion 5035 of the frame 5030 and the retaining portion 5043.1 engages the rib 5035.1 with a snap-fit (relatively hard elbow snaps into relatively soft frame). That is, the retaining portion 5043.1 deforms and compresses the rib 5035.1 inwardly until the retaining portion 5043.1 reaches its operative position in which the rib 5035.1 springs back to original form, as shown in
The circumferential flange 5043.2 and circumferential rib 5043.3 (rib 5043.3 may be optional) provided to the elbow 5040 help prevent rotation of the elbow 5040 relative to the frame (e.g., prevents rocking or wiggle and keeps elbow and frame concentric). In an embodiment, the circumferential rib 5043.3 may be spaced apart ribs (rather than continuous) to reduce friction.
In the illustrated embodiment, a small clearance may be provided between the circumferential flange 5043.2 and the edge of the opening into the internal volume of the frame, e.g., only contact points are the sealing lip 5035.2 with the elbow and the retaining portion 5043.1 with the frame. Thus, the insertion length of the elbow into the frame is about the length of D4 (e.g., about 9-11 mm (e.g., 9.6 mm)), which provides sufficient length to securely retain the elbow to the frame. In addition, the elbow does not engage the frame along its entire length, so less friction is provided between the elbow and the frame. In an embodiment, the ratio of the insertion length (D4) to the related elbow diameter (D2) may be about 50-75%, e.g., 9.6/15 or about 65%.
Also, the sealing lip 5035.1 is angled towards the inlet of the frame opening and engages a lower end of the circumferential flange 5043.2, as shown in
However, it should be appreciated that the elbow 5040 may be attached to the frame 5030 in other suitable arrangements, e.g., ball joint.
As illustrated, the socket 7335 on frame 7330 provides a generally rounded inwardly facing surface, and the ball 7345 on elbow 7340 has a generally rounded or spherical outwardly facing surface adapted to engage the socket 7335 with an interference fit.
Also, the frame 7330 provides a channel 7333 structured to retain the nasal prong assembly, and the main body of the elbow 7340 includes a relatively flat portion for a vent arrangement. The vent arrangement includes a plurality of vent holes 7328 for gas washout. In the illustrated embodiment, the vent holes 7328 are arranged in a generally circular or arcuate manner. However, other suitable hole arrangements, hole numbers, and/or hole shapes on the elbow are possible.
Also, the frame 7430 provides a channel 7433 structured to retain the nasal prong assembly, and the main body of the elbow 7440 includes a relatively flat portion for a vent arrangement. The vent arrangement includes a plurality of vent holes 7428 for gas washout. In the illustrated embodiment, the vent holes 7428 are arranged in a generally circular or arcuate manner. However, other suitable hole arrangements, hole numbers, and/or hole shapes on the elbow are possible.
The swivel 7560 includes a rib 7565.1 and an inwardly facing sealing surface 7565.2. The other end of the elbow 7540 includes a retaining portion 7545.1 adapted to engage the rib 7565.1 (e.g., with a snap fit) and a sealing end portion 7545.2 adapted to engage the sealing surface 7565.2 to provide a seal. Also, the elbow 7540 includes a flange 7545.3 adapted to engage the end face of the swivel 7560.
Because the elbow provides a relatively soft part to engage the frame and swivel, no additional seal ring is provided to seal between the frame and elbow or between the swivel and elbow.
Also, the frame 7530 provides a channel 7533 structured to retain the nasal prong assembly, and the main body of the elbow 7540 includes a relatively flat portion for a vent arrangement. The vent arrangement includes a plurality of vent holes 7528 for gas washout. In the illustrated embodiment, the vent holes 7528 are arranged in a generally circular manner (e.g., concentric circles). However, other suitable hole arrangements, hole numbers, and/or hole shapes on the elbow are possible.
Also, the frame 7630 provides a channel 7633 structured to retain the nasal prong assembly, and the main body of the elbow 7640 includes a relatively flat portion for a vent arrangement. The vent arrangement includes a plurality of vent holes 7628 for gas washout. In the illustrated embodiment, the vent holes 7628 are arranged in a generally circular or arcuate manner. However, other suitable hole arrangements, hole numbers, and/or hole shapes on the elbow are possible.
Also, the frame 7730 provides a channel 7733 structured to retain the nasal prong assembly, and the main body of the elbow 7740 includes a relatively flat portion for a vent arrangement. The vent arrangement includes a plurality of vent holes 7728 for gas washout. In the illustrated embodiment, the vent holes 7728 are arranged in offset rows (e.g., six offset rows). However, other suitable hole arrangements, hole numbers, and/or hole shapes on the elbow are possible.
In addition, the elbow 7740 includes a baffle 7750 that is arranged to divide the upper arm of the elbow into an air delivery passage and an exhaust passage. As illustrated, the baffle has a wavy or w-shaped configuration. However, other baffle shapes are possible.
Also, the frame 7830 provides a channel 7833 structured to retain the nasal prong assembly, and the main body of the elbow 7840 includes a relatively flat portion for a vent arrangement. The vent arrangement includes a plurality of vent holes 7828 for gas washout. In the illustrated embodiment, the vent holes 7828 are arranged in offset rows (e.g., three offset rows). However, other suitable hole arrangements, hole numbers, and/or hole shapes on the elbow are possible.
In addition, the elbow 7840 includes a baffle 7850 that is arranged to divide the upper arm of the elbow into an air delivery passage and an exhaust passage. As illustrated, the baffle has a generally flat or planar configuration. However, other baffle shapes are possible.
Also, the frame 7930 provides a channel 7933 structured to retain the nasal prong assembly, and the main body of the elbow 7940 includes a relatively flat portion for a vent arrangement. The vent arrangement includes a plurality of vent holes 7928 for gas washout. In the illustrated embodiment, the vent holes 7928 are arranged in an arc and each vent hole includes a generally oval or capsule shape. However, other suitable hole arrangements, hole numbers, and/or hole shapes on the elbow are possible.
In addition, the elbow 7940 includes a baffle 7950 that is arranged to divide the upper arm of the elbow into an air delivery passage and an exhaust passage. As illustrated, the baffle has a generally inverse U-shaped configuration. However, other baffle shapes are possible.
Vent Arrangement
A vent arrangement 5045 is positioned on a relatively flat portion of the elbow 5040. As illustrated, the relatively flat portion has a generally circular shape.
In the illustrated embodiment, the vent arrangement 5045 includes a plurality of holes 5047 arranged in concentric rings, e.g., three concentric rings R1, R2, R3. As shown in
In the illustrated embodiment, each hole 5047 may have a generally part conic shape, including opposed walls that converge from a larger (inside) diameter to a smaller (outside) diameter, as viewed in the direction of exhausted gas (see
However, it should be appreciated that the vent arrangement 5045 may include other suitable hole arrangements, hole numbers, and/or hole shapes.
Also, as shown in
Elbow with Alternative Vent Arrangement
The vent arrangement 5745 is positioned on a relatively flat portion of the elbow 5740 and includes a plurality of holes 5747 arranged in offset rows. As shown in
In the illustrated embodiment, each hole 5747 may have a generally part conic shape, including opposed walls that converge from a larger (inside) diameter to a smaller (outside) diameter, as viewed in the direction of exhausted gas (see
In this embodiment, each vent hole 5747 includes a diameter (about 0.6 mm) that is smaller than the diameter of each vent hole for ResMed's Swift II mask (about 0.7 mm). Thus, in comparison to ResMed's Swift II mask, each vent hole 5747 provides a smaller venting area (venting area=number of holes×area of each hole), less vent flow, and a smaller pitch (distance between holes).
As shown in
However, it should be appreciated that the vent arrangement 5745 may include other suitable hole arrangements, hole numbers, hole sizes, and/or hole shapes.
The elbow 5740 is structured to provide an interface between the frame and the short tube assembly (e.g., see
The elbow includes one or more of the following functions: to provide a means of attaching tubing to the frame; to provide adequate area for a vent (due to limited space on the rest of the patient interface); to provide a total vent flow (in conjunction with the rest of the mask system) for safe use and flow generator compatibility; to provide an impedance (in conjunction with the rest of the mask system) within specification of ResMed's “Mirage” flow generator curve setting; to provide adequate CO2 washout performance (in conjunction with the rest of the mask system); to provide adjustment of the tube position through 360 degree rotation; to provide a system of decoupling tube drag forces through rotation and/or swiveling actions; to provide easy assembly and disassembly with the mask; to provide adequate vent noise performance; to provide a vent direction that does not adversely affect the comfort of the patient or bed partner; to allow the user to easily clean the mask; to be unobtrusive and both visually and physically minimal in order to avoid the user feeling stifled or claustrophobic; and/or to be aesthetically pleasing and reflect high quality and style.
In an embodiment, the total flow specification for the patient interface of
In the illustrated embodiment, the vent arrangement 5745 is located on the elbow 5740. Alternatively, vents may be located at other suitable locations, e.g., on the frame, short tube, etc. In the illustrated embodiment, the vent design consists of an array of 53 holes of nominal diameter of 0.6 mm to provide adequate vent flow.
Features of the vent arrangement will now be described in greater detail. The vent pin blankoff provides a flat surface with about 75° blankoff. The elbow angle of 105° improves aesthetics and optimizes range of tubing positioning. The 105° elbow may also be quieter than a 120° elbow, for example. The flat surface for blankoff minimizes tooling risk, tool life/maintenance and flash.
The smaller vent hole size of 00.6 mm produces less noise and provides acceptable CO2 performance with humidification maintained.
The vent hole draft (i.e., converging vent hole with 5° included draft) produce less noise.
The vent hole inlet radius of about 0.34 mm is larger (than ResMed's Swift II, about 0.25 mm) for less noise (e.g., maximum possible between holes).
The vent hole length may range from about 1.7 mm for inner holes to 2.5 mm for outer holes. A longer vent hole length is provided for less noise. The hole length varies, e.g., due to the curvature of the elbow, e.g., curvature provided for a smoother internal wall transition between the inlet and outlet which produces less noise.
As shown in
In an embodiment, the vent hole diameter, draft, inlet radius, length and spacing may be sized to fit in required space.
The internal elbow geometry provides an internal wall transition between the inlet and outlet that is relatively smooth. The smoother internal wall transition between the inlet and outlet produces less noise. As illustrated, the internal curvature is gradual while still maintaining an acceptable hole length for the outer holes due to the flat blank-off surface area.
The low mask noise of the patient interface may be achieved through one or more of the following features: lower flow specification (reduced flow means reduced noise); smaller vent hole diameter of 00.6 mm; increased vent hole length (for the outer holes) and larger inlet radius; elbow internal transition between inlet and outlet as gradual as possible; close spacing (high concentration) of vent holes leads to interaction between adjacent jets that reduces the noise; negligible leak in the rest of the patient interface which contributes to overall mask noise.
In an embodiment, the vent arrangement has a sound power of about 25 dBA (e.g., also due to the lower flow at the same pressure), which is significantly quieter than vents known in the art (e.g., ResMed's Swift II (28-29 dBA), Opus (31 dBA), OptiLife (34 dBA)).
As shown in
The smaller vent hole diameter and the lower flow specification assists in minimizing jetting. Also, because the vent exhausts in a narrow beam, the jetting is confined to a smaller area and therefore potentially less likely to affect (or more easily managed by) the patient or bed partner.
The elbow design has been structured to suit the impedance requirements of the ResMed's “Mirage” flow curve. Matching the impedance characteristics in this way assists with ensuring compatibility with ResMed flow generators. However, it should be appreciated that the elbow may be used with other suitable flow generators.
When the elbow is assembled to the frame a thin silicone lip 6035.2 (thickness of 0.3 to 0.4 mm or less) is deflected creating an interference seal with the elbow sealing surface 5741. The amount of interference is determined by both the axial stackup to the retention feature and the diametrical stackup. This interface effectively provides a zero leak interface under static operating conditions. The amount of interference has been designed to accommodate some tube drag.
The retention of the elbow to the frame is important to ensure that the short tube assembly does not inadvertently disconnect during use. A 10N tube drag load was considered to be sufficient retention force in all directions, e.g., at this force the mask seal to the patient is broken and likely to be completely clear of the face. The retention of the elbow is provided by a snap engagement of 0.7 mm all around the circumference. A 60 degree return angle A1 on the elbow barb 5743.1 was implemented to assist disassembly by the user while maintaining sufficient retention.
Assembly and disassembly should be easy enough to be performed by a typical user with limited dexterity considering the small size of the parts. Assembly of the elbow to the frame is assisted with a 30 degrees insertion angle A2 on the elbow barb 5743.1. The intent was to have an axial assembly force under about 40N. Subjectively assembly is actually easier as the user is more likely to manipulate the elbow into position with some angle or twist and this requires less force. Elbow disassembly is linked with elbow retention however disassembly is realistically easier than the retention force as the user can peel the elbow out with much less force.
The elbow can rotate 360 degrees within the frame to provide flexibility in tube positions and decouple tube drag forces during sleep movement. Due to the hard-to-soft interference for sealing of the elbow to frame, some rotational resistance may be provided. Some resistance may be preferable over freely rotating as the tube can be located in a certain direction without it inadvertently swinging around and disturbing the wearer. Factors influencing the rotation torque include the sealing lip interference, the sealing lip thickness, and/or the silicone frame hardness.
Sufficient clearance elsewhere in the interface (e.g., between the elbow flange 5749 and frame 6030) was ensured across tolerance ranges to ensure minimal contact and torque contribution. Clearance is controlled to some extent to minimize movement of the elbow within the frame that may lead to leakage under a tube drag load.
In an embodiment, the elbow rotation torque specification is less than 30 Nmm and subjectively is considered to be acceptable if the short tube can rotate under its own weight.
The 105 degree angle elbow includes one or more of the following advantages: reduces the chance of the short tube impacting on the patient's chest while ensuring that the tube can be angled back far enough to route the tubing over the head; less noise; less obtrusive.
Wall thickness variation of the elbow was minimized however, some thicker wall sections were implemented to improve the aesthetics and unobtrusiveness of the elbow. The circular groove in the elbow flange 5749 was implemented to remove material bulk from this area of the elbow, improve molding quality, and/or dimensional control.
Short Tube and Swivel
The short tube 5070 is adapted to interconnect the patient interface with a standard air delivery tube (e.g., 22 mm tube). As shown in
The tube portion 5072 (e.g., 13-15 mm inner diameter (e.g., 13.5 mm inner diameter)) may have a reduced length (e.g., 30-40 mm (e.g., 35 mm)) to reduce impedance. Also, the width, height, pitch, and/or helical rib of the tube portion 5072 may be adjusted to adjust the flexibility of the short tube. For example, the size of the pitch of the helix around the tube portion may be adjusted to adjust the flexibility.
End Fittings
Each end fitting 5074 (e.g., constructed of a semi-rigid material such as TPE, silicone) may be integrally formed in one piece with the tube portion 5072 (e.g., constructed of a hard plastic material (e.g., 45-55 shore D hardness) such as polypropylene, PTE, Dupont Hybrid, Hytrel, Ritaflex, opaque ribs, translucent film, or combinations thereof) or may be formed separately from the tube portion 5072 and attached thereto (e.g., glued, welded). In an embodiment, the end fittings 5074 may be overmolded to respective ends of the tube portion 5072.
As best shown in
Swivel Attachment
The swivel 5090 (e.g., constructed of a hard plastic material such as polypropylene, Hytrel, HTPC) includes a first portion 5092 adapted to connect to the short tube 5070 and second portion 5094 adapted to connect to an air delivery tube.
As shown in
The end fitting 5074 of the short tube 5070 is structured to engage the first portion 5092 of the swivel 5090 with a snap or press fit, i.e., annular flange 5075.2 resiliently deflects into windows 5095.1. In addition, the sealing lip 5075.1 of the end fitting 5074 resiliently deflects into engagement with the inwardly facing tapered surface 5095.2 to provide an interference fit for sealing around the interior perimeter of the swivel. The first portion 5092 of the swivel 5090 also includes cut outs 5098 (see
In an alternative embodiment, the swivel may be overmolded to an end fitting of the short tube, e.g., to reduce the number of components, size, etc. In other alternatives, the swivel may be bonded with glue or welded to the end fitting.
Elbow Attachment
The other of the end fittings 5074 of the short tube 5070 is attachable to the elbow 5040 in a similar manner as the swivel 5090. Specifically, as shown in
The short tube includes one or more of the following functions: connects the air supply to the patient interface from the flow generator within an acceptable level of impedance level as specified by system requirement; reduces forces that may de-stabilize the mask and sealing because of the tube drag that weight of the flow generator tube and tangling of this tube may cause; reduces visual and physical obtrusiveness of the overall mask size; the inside of the tube is smooth to minimize generating noise due to air turbulence; the stiffness of the tube shall be sufficient to prevent kinking or stretched under normal usage conditions; tube fittings shall not have any smell; the tube shall have thermal insulation properties to reduce condensation build-up or “raining” in the tube; aesthetically pleasing and reflect high quality and style; the tube should be easy to assemble/disassemble from the mask; total leak in the short tube assembly should not cause the total mask flow to be outside the specified flow limit; the tube end fitting should have a finger grip area, an area that can hold on to during assembly and disassembly of the tube from the elbow or from the swivel.
In an embodiment, the length of the tube is about 200-400 mm, e.g., 300 mm, the elbow to tube retention is more than about 20N, and the swivel to tube retention is more than about 20N.
The short tube may also include one or more of the following features:
Through Impedance: The through impedance characteristics in the short tube assembly (e.g., short tube and end fittings or connectors) should not cause the mask system impedance to be elevated above acceptable limits. The length and the diameter of the short tube, surface finish inside the connectors and in the short tube, the shape of the elbow fitting, and amount of change in flow direction may be contributing factors that affect the through impedance in the short tube assembly. In addition, the position of the airflow inlet in relation to the nasal prong assembly may contribute to the airflow impedance.
Kinking and Occlusion: The short tube may be sufficiently rigid or constructed to minimize the possibility of kinking when placed over the top of bedrails or through the top of doors of incubators. The short tube may be structured to prevent occlusion when placed in areas around the patient, including when the patient's head or arm is on the short tube. The resistance to kinking and occlusion of the short tube can be based on the material strength of the short tube, the thickness of the short tube walls and the ribs, and the short tube dimensions such as the length, the pitch distance of the helix, and the diameter of the short tube.
Flexibility of the Short Tube: The short tube should be sufficiently flexible to reduce any forces applied to the mask system during any movement of the air tubes. Movement of the short tube towards different elbow positions should not cause extra leakage between the nasal prongs and nasal cavity.
Leakage in the Short Tube Assembly: In an embodiment, the leakage in the short tube assembly is less than 1 L/min @ 20 cmH2O.
Tube Retention: In an embodiment, the short tube assembly is structured to withstand 30 cmH2O of pressure for about 12 hours without dislodgment of parts, and the connection of the parts is structured to withstand 20 N of pull force at various angles without fracturing or detaching from the mask elbow (force limit is about double the maximum bearable force which could be applied to person's face).
Swivel Rotational Requirements: The purpose of the swivel is to reduce application of any torsion forces to the mask system when the patient changes sleeping positions. The swivel can rotate through 360 degrees relative to the tube adaptor or lower swivel. In an embodiment, the swivel will not squeak during normal movement of the short tube or the mask system. In an embodiment, the swivel may securely snap-fit onto the lower swivel.
Comfort Factor: The short tube may be structured to optimize comfort when the patient moves during sleep. For example, all the parts in the short tube assembly may have a substantially smooth finish on its outer surface.
Assembly Integrity: In an embodiment, the short tube assembly does not have parts that are likely to catch bedclothes and dislodge the mask system or interrupt the seal.
Biocompatibility: In an embodiment, all short tube components are biocompatible.
Chemical Human Factors: In an embodiment, the tube assembly is easy to assemble and disassemble. For example, the components may be intuitive to assemble and disassemble, and may be fail safe (only able to be assembled in one way) if ends of the short tube assembly have different connection.
Dislodging: The mask system may be structured so that small parts cannot dislodge and be inhaled.
Durability During Use: The short tube assembly (including mask) may be durable or disposable.
In an embodiment, the short tube may have a diameter of about 13-13.5 mm (e.g., 13.5 mm) and a length of about 200-250 mm (e.g., 250 mm). However, other dimensions are possible as noted above.
The short tube may be manufactured from Polyolefin (e.g., which allows the tube to be made transparent), Hytrel (e.g., Hytrel 5556), or Riteflex materials. In an embodiment, the short tube and connectors may be made from a combination of Hytrel or Riteflex material to allow overmolding of the short tube on the connectors.
Patient Interface
Comfort and Seal
Embodiments of the invention are directed towards patient interfaces having structure to provide a comfortable and effective seal with the patient's face. Moreover, embodiments of the invention are directed towards patient interfaces having improved static sealing performance (e.g., the ability to allow lower strap tension from headgear to create a sealing force) and improved dynamic sealing performance (e.g., the ability to withstand macro-movement from a patient rolling around in bed and maintain a seal and/or to withstand changes in the patient's face in the short term (when the face relaxes and the cheeks fill will pressurized air) and in the long term (if the patient's facial features change, e.g., based on weight change, etc.). For example, embodiments of the invention are directed towards patient interfaces having one or more features that, either alone or in cooperation with other features, provide a unit that as a whole allows a range of movement without breaking seal or losing comfort (e.g., patient can sleep on side without dislodging nasal prongs from the patient's nose). Such interface properties are described in greater detail below.
Comfort, Seal, and Allowing Range of Sleeping Positions
As illustrated, the patient interface 5010 provides an arrangement including a low number of components, a relatively small overall size including a relatively small, narrow frame (smaller profile, streamlined, less obtrusive), no seal rings, end caps, or vent caps, relatively thin headgear yokes with reduced obtrusiveness (e.g., less visual obtrusion), easy assembly, enhanced adjustability, and perceivable to be light and small. In addition, the patient interface 5010 provides an arrangement that may be more comfortable for side sleepers and may even allow the patient to be face down while maintaining a seal. For example, the patient interface 5010 allows a range of movement without breaking seal or loosing comfort (e.g., patient can sleep on side without dislodging nasal prongs from the patient's nose).
In an embodiment, as shown in
Alternative Systems for Positioning and Supporting Nasal Prongs
For example, in an embodiment, ResMed's Swift mask may be reduced in width by relocating tube lugs on the frame to the inside of the frame, the elbow may be shortened, a seal ring may be added to the port plug or elbow (e.g., o-ring), and the yokes may be connected directly to the frame.
In another embodiment, the nasal prong assembly may be reduced in width. For example,
Range of Movement
In an embodiment, the patient interface may be broadly broken down into a pair of nasal prongs adapted to provide an effective seal or interface with the patient's nose and a support arrangement to support the nasal prongs in an operative position on the patient's face. The support arrangement is structured to provide a range of rotational, axial, and lateral movement to the nasal prongs while maintaining a sufficient seal and resisting the application of tube drag and headgear tension to the nasal prongs. In an embodiment, the support arrangement may include everything besides the nasal prongs and even parts of the nasal prongs, e.g., a gusset, a frame, and/or headgear as described above. Thus, the patient interface provides one or more features that, either alone or in cooperation, allow a range of movement without breaking seal or loosing comfort.
While the invention has been described in connection with what are presently considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiments, but on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the invention. Also, the various embodiments described above may be implemented in conjunction with other embodiments, e.g., aspects of one embodiment may be combined with aspects of another embodiment to realize yet other embodiments. Further, each independent feature or component of any given assembly may constitute an additional embodiment. In addition, while the invention has particular application to patients who suffer from OSA, it is to be appreciated that patients who suffer from other illnesses (e.g., congestive heart failure, diabetes, morbid obesity, stroke, bariatric surgery, etc.) can derive benefit from the above teachings. Moreover, the above teachings have applicability with patients and non-patients alike in non-medical applications.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008900134 | Jan 2008 | AU | national |
| 2008900136 | Jan 2008 | AU | national |
| 2008900137 | Jan 2008 | AU | national |
| 2008900138 | Jan 2008 | AU | national |
| 2008900139 | Jan 2008 | AU | national |
| 2008900140 | Jan 2008 | AU | national |
| 2008900141 | Jan 2008 | AU | national |
| 2008900891 | Feb 2008 | AU | national |
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 17/689,102, filed Mar. 8, 2022, now allowed, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/872,442, filed May 12, 2020, now pending, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/288,510, filed Oct. 7, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,675,428, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/219,852, filed Jul. 29, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,480,809, which claimed the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Nos. 60/935,179, filed Jul. 30, 2007, 60/996,160, filed Nov. 5, 2007, 61/006,409, filed Jan. 11, 2008, 61/064,818, filed Mar. 28, 2008, and 61/071,512, filed May 2, 2008, and Australian Provisional Application Nos. AU 2008900891, filed Feb. 25, 2008, AU 2008900134, filed Jan. 11, 2008, AU 2008900136, filed Jan. 11, 2008, AU 2008900137, filed Jan. 11, 2008, AU 2008900138, filed Jan. 11, 2008, AU 2008900139, filed Jan. 11, 2008, AU 2008900140, filed Jan. 11, 2008, and AU 2008900141, filed Jan. 11, 2008, each of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 443191 | Illing | Dec 1890 | A |
| 1081745 | Johnston | Dec 1913 | A |
| 1125542 | Humphries | Jan 1915 | A |
| 1192186 | Greene | Jul 1916 | A |
| 1229050 | Donald | Jun 1917 | A |
| 1282527 | Bidonde | Oct 1918 | A |
| 1362766 | McGargill | Dec 1920 | A |
| 1445010 | Feinberg | Feb 1923 | A |
| 1610793 | Kaufman | Dec 1926 | A |
| 1873160 | Sturtevant | Aug 1932 | A |
| 2353643 | Bulbulian | Jul 1944 | A |
| 2415846 | Randall | Feb 1947 | A |
| 2433565 | Korman | Dec 1947 | A |
| 2625155 | Engelder | Jan 1953 | A |
| 2706983 | Matheson et al. | Apr 1955 | A |
| 2998818 | Tabor | May 1956 | A |
| 2931356 | Schwarz | Apr 1960 | A |
| 3013556 | Galleher | Dec 1961 | A |
| 3670726 | Mahon et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
| 3682171 | Dali et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
| 3739774 | Gregory | Jun 1973 | A |
| 3754552 | King | Aug 1973 | A |
| 3861385 | Carden | Jan 1975 | A |
| 3902486 | Guichard | Sep 1975 | A |
| 3905361 | Hewson et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
| 3938614 | Ahs | Feb 1976 | A |
| 3972321 | Proctor | Aug 1976 | A |
| 4006744 | Steer | Feb 1977 | A |
| 4142527 | Garcia | Mar 1979 | A |
| 4153051 | Shippert | May 1979 | A |
| 4156426 | Gold | May 1979 | A |
| 4248218 | Fischer | Feb 1981 | A |
| 4263908 | Mizerak | Apr 1981 | A |
| 4264743 | Maruyama et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
| 4266540 | Panzik et al. | May 1981 | A |
| 4267845 | Robertson, Jr. et al. | May 1981 | A |
| 4273124 | Zimmerman | Jun 1981 | A |
| 4312359 | Olson | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4367735 | Dali | Jan 1983 | A |
| 4367816 | Wilkes | Jan 1983 | A |
| 4406283 | Bir | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4414973 | Matheson et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4422456 | Teip | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4449526 | Elam | May 1984 | A |
| 4455675 | Bose et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
| 4493614 | Chu et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
| 4548200 | Wapner | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4549542 | Chein | Nov 1985 | A |
| 4572323 | Randall | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4587967 | Chu et al. | May 1986 | A |
| 4601465 | Roy | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4617637 | Chu et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4630604 | Montesi | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4641647 | Behan | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4660555 | Payton | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4671271 | Bishop et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4676241 | Webb et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4699139 | Marshall et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4706664 | Snook et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4711636 | Bierman | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4713844 | Westgate | Dec 1987 | A |
| D293613 | Wingler | Jan 1988 | S |
| 4753233 | Grimes | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4767411 | Edmunds | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4774946 | Ackerman et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4782832 | Trimble et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4790829 | Bowden et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4802857 | Laughlin | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4803981 | Vickery | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4811730 | Milano | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4830138 | Palmaer et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4838878 | Kalt et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4899740 | Napolitano | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4907584 | McGinnis | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4915105 | Lee | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4919128 | Kopala et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4919654 | Kalt | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4944310 | Sullivan | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4945907 | Tayebi | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4960121 | Nelson et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4966590 | Kalt | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4969880 | Zamierowski | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4971051 | Toffolon | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4976698 | Stokley | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4989599 | Carter | Feb 1991 | A |
| 4996983 | Amrhein | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5000173 | Zalkin et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5005571 | Dietz | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5020163 | Aileo et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5022900 | Bar-Yona et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5023955 | Murphy, II et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5025805 | Nutter | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5038772 | Kolbe et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5042478 | Kopala et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5046200 | Feder | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5046491 | Derrick | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5074297 | Venegas | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5113857 | Dickerman et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5117818 | Palfy | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5121745 | Israel | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5127397 | Kohnke | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5137017 | Salter | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5138722 | Urella et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| D333015 | Farmer et al. | Feb 1993 | S |
| 5188101 | Tumolo | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5207665 | Davis et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5220699 | Farris | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5243709 | Sheehan et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5243971 | Sullivan | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5245995 | Sullivan et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5261893 | Zamierowski | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5263939 | Wortrich | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5265592 | Beaussant | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5265595 | Rudolph | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5267557 | Her-Mou | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5269296 | Landis | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5271391 | Graves | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5304146 | Johnson et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5299599 | Farmer et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5335656 | Bowe et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5349949 | Schegerin | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5355878 | Griffiths et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5355893 | Mick et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5364367 | Banks et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5372130 | Stem et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5372388 | Gargiulo | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5372389 | Tam et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5372390 | Conway et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5372391 | Bast et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5375593 | Press | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5385141 | Granatiero | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5394568 | Brostrom et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5396885 | Nelson | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5398676 | Press et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5400776 | Bartholomew | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5419318 | Tayebi | May 1995 | A |
| 5425359 | Liou | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5429683 | Le Mitouard | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5437267 | Weinstein et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5441046 | Starr et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5462528 | Roewer | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5477852 | Landis et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5526806 | Sansoni | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5488948 | Dubruille et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5509409 | Weatherholt | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5513634 | Jackson | May 1996 | A |
| 5513635 | Bedi | May 1996 | A |
| 5524300 | Chiang | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5533506 | Wood | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5538000 | Rudolph | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5538001 | Bridges | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5560354 | Berthon-Jones et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5570684 | Behr | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5592938 | Scarberry et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5623923 | Bertheau et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5647357 | Barnett et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5653228 | Byrd | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5655527 | Scarberry et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5662101 | Ogden et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5682881 | Winthrop et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5704345 | Berthon-Jones et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5707342 | Tanaka | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5724965 | Handke et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5735272 | Dillon et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5740799 | Nielson | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5752511 | Simmons et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5794619 | Edeiman et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5807341 | Heim | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5842469 | Rapp et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5906203 | Klockseth et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5918598 | Belfer et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5921239 | McCall et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5954049 | Foley et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5975079 | Hellings et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6019101 | Cotner et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6026811 | Settle | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6044844 | Kwok et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6082360 | Rudolph et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6086118 | McNaughton et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6095996 | Steer et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6098205 | Schwartz et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6109263 | Feuchtgruber | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6112746 | Kwok et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6119693 | Kwok et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6119694 | Correa et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6123071 | Berthon-Jones et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6123082 | Berthon-Jones | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6139787 | Harrison | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6152137 | Schwartz et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6193914 | Harrison | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6196223 | Belfer et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6211263 | Cinelli et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6231548 | Bassett | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6241930 | Harrison | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6258066 | Urich | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6295366 | Haller et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6328038 | Kessler et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6341606 | Bordewick et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6347631 | Hansen et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6357441 | Kwok et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6358279 | Tahi et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6374826 | Gunaratnam et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6412487 | Gunaratnam et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6412488 | Barnett et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6412593 | Jones | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6419660 | Russo | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6422238 | Lithgow | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6423036 | Van Huizen | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6431172 | Bordewick | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6434796 | Speirs | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6439234 | Curti et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6448303 | Paul | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6467482 | Boussignac | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6467483 | Kopacko et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6470887 | Martinez | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6478026 | Wood | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6482178 | Andrews et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6491034 | Gunaratnam et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6513526 | Kwok et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6530373 | Patron et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6532961 | Kwok et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6536435 | Fecteau et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6561188 | Ellis | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6561190 | Kwok et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6561192 | Palmer | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6561193 | Noble | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6571798 | Thornton | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6579267 | Lynch et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6581601 | Ziaee | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6581602 | Kwok et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6584975 | Taylor | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6595214 | Hecker et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6595215 | Wood | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6607516 | Cinelli et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6627289 | Dilnik et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6631718 | Lovell | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6634358 | Kwok et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6637434 | Noble | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6644315 | Ziaee | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6655385 | Curti et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6663600 | Bierman et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6669712 | Cardoso | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| D485905 | Moore et al. | Jan 2004 | S |
| 6679257 | Robertson et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6679265 | Strickland et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6701927 | Kwok et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6710099 | Cinelli et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6766800 | Chu et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6766817 | da Silva | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6776162 | Wood | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6776163 | Dougill et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6789543 | Cannon | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6805117 | Ho et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6807967 | Wood | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6817362 | Gelinas et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6820617 | Robertson et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6823865 | Drew et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6823869 | Raje et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6834650 | Fini | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6840238 | Van Hegelsom | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6860270 | Sniadach | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6895965 | Scarberry et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6907882 | Ging et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6918404 | Dias da Silva | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6926004 | Schumacher | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6938620 | Payne, Jr. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6968844 | Liland | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6972003 | Bierman et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6986352 | Frater et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6997177 | Wood | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7011090 | Drew et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7018362 | Bierman et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7052127 | Harrison | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7066586 | da Silva | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7076282 | Munro et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7080645 | Genger et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7101359 | Kline et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7107989 | Frater et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7146976 | McKown | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7152599 | Thomas | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7152601 | Barakat et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7178525 | Matula, Jr. et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7191781 | Wood | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7207328 | Altemus | Apr 2007 | B1 |
| 7210481 | Lovell et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
| 7237551 | Ho et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7243723 | Surjaatmadja | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| D550836 | Chandran et al. | Sep 2007 | S |
| D552733 | Criscuolo et al. | Oct 2007 | S |
| 7285255 | Kadlec et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7302950 | Berthon-Jones et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7318437 | Gunaratnam et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7353826 | Sleeper et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7523754 | Lithgow | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7640934 | Zollinger et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7658189 | Davidson | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7874291 | Ging et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 8800563 | Doherty | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 9480809 | Guney | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9629974 | Gibson | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9974915 | Haskard | May 2018 | B2 |
| 10675428 | Guney | Jun 2020 | B2 |
| 11484676 | Kooij et al. | Nov 2022 | B2 |
| 20010020474 | Hecker et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20020005198 | Kwok et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020029780 | Frater et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020046755 | Devoss | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020053347 | Ziaee | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020066452 | Kessler et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020069872 | Gradon et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020096178 | Ziaee | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020124849 | Billette De Villemeur | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020143296 | Russo | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020157673 | Kessler et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020174868 | Kwok et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020185134 | Bishop | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030000526 | Goebel | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030019495 | Palkon et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030079749 | Strickland et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030089373 | Gradon et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030111080 | Olsen et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030154980 | Berthon-Jones et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030168063 | Gambone et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030196656 | Moore et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030196658 | Ging | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040025882 | Madaus et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040025885 | Payne, Jr. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040045551 | Eaton et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040065328 | Amarasinghe et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040106891 | Langan et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040111104 | Schein et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040112377 | Amarasinghe | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040112384 | Lithgow et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040118406 | Lithgow et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040127856 | Johnson | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040211428 | Jones | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040221850 | Ging et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040226564 | Persson | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040226566 | Gunaratnam | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20050011523 | Aylsworth et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050028822 | Sleeper et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050033247 | Thompson | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050039757 | Wood | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050051171 | Booth | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050051176 | Riggins | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050056286 | Huddart et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050061326 | Payne, Jr. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050101933 | Marrs et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050126573 | Jaffre et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050150495 | Rittner et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050155604 | Ging et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050211252 | Lang et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050241644 | Gunaratnam et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050284481 | Meyer | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060060200 | Ho et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060081250 | Bordewick et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060095008 | Lampropoulos et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060095009 | Lampropoulos et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060118117 | Berthon-Jones | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060124131 | Chandran | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060137690 | Gunaratnam et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060174887 | Chandran | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060196511 | Lau et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060207597 | Wright | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060213520 | Frater et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060231103 | Matula et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060237017 | Davidson et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060283461 | Lubke | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070017525 | Madaus et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070023044 | Kwok et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070125385 | Ho | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070125387 | Zollinger | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070144525 | Davidson et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070186930 | Davidson et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070272249 | Chandran et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070282272 | Bannon et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080004573 | Kaufmann et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080006277 | Worboys et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080047560 | Veliss et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080060649 | Veliss et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080065022 | Kyvik et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080110469 | Weinberg | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080200880 | Kyvik et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080257354 | Davidson et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090044808 | Guney et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090126739 | Ng et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090277452 | Lubke et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20100000534 | Kooij et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100000537 | McAuley | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100018534 | Veliss et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20110232649 | Collazo | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20170021121 | Guney et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20220193362 | Guney et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 199651130 | Oct 1996 | AU |
| 2005100738 | Nov 2005 | AU |
| 1750854 | Mar 2006 | CN |
| 1901961 | Jan 2007 | CN |
| 185017 | May 1907 | DE |
| 30 11 900 | Oct 1980 | DE |
| 146 688 | Feb 1981 | DE |
| 37 19 009 | Dec 1988 | DE |
| 39 27 038 | Feb 1991 | DE |
| 297 23 101 | Jul 1998 | DE |
| 197 03 526 | Aug 1998 | DE |
| 199 44 242 | Mar 2001 | DE |
| 100 02 571 | Jul 2001 | DE |
| 102 13 905 | Oct 2002 | DE |
| 10 2004 055 433 | Nov 2004 | DE |
| 0 288 937 | Nov 1988 | EP |
| 0 427 474 | May 1991 | EP |
| 0 466 960 | Jan 1992 | EP |
| 0 303 090 | Apr 1992 | EP |
| 0 658 356 | Jun 1995 | EP |
| 0 776 679 | Jun 1997 | EP |
| 1 099 452 | May 2001 | EP |
| 1 258 266 | Nov 2002 | EP |
| 1 481 702 | Dec 2004 | EP |
| 1 721 630 | Nov 2006 | EP |
| 2 027 880 | Feb 2009 | EP |
| 2 140 902 | Jan 2010 | EP |
| 2 720 280 | Dec 1995 | FR |
| 532 214 | Jan 1941 | GB |
| 2 176 404 | Dec 1986 | GB |
| 2 368 533 | May 2002 | GB |
| 2 385 533 | Aug 2003 | GB |
| 2006-518230 | Aug 2006 | JP |
| 2006-518231 | Aug 2006 | JP |
| 2008-541955 | Nov 2008 | JP |
| 570059 | Aug 2010 | NZ |
| 582559 | Apr 2011 | NZ |
| 763987 | Nov 2021 | NZ |
| WO 1982003548 | Oct 1982 | WO |
| WO 1987001950 | Apr 1987 | WO |
| WO 1992020392 | Nov 1992 | WO |
| WO 1992020395 | Nov 1992 | WO |
| WO 1996028207 | Sep 1996 | WO |
| WO 1998004310 | Feb 1998 | WO |
| WO 1998012965 | Apr 1998 | WO |
| WO 1998023305 | Jun 1998 | WO |
| WO 1999016327 | Apr 1999 | WO |
| WO 1999025410 | May 1999 | WO |
| WO 1999043375 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| WO 1999061088 | Dec 1999 | WO |
| WO 2000020072 | Apr 2000 | WO |
| WO 2000038772 | Jul 2000 | WO |
| WO 2000050121 | Aug 2000 | WO |
| WO 2000069521 | Nov 2000 | WO |
| WO 2000072905 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| WO 2000074758 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| WO 2000076568 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| WO 2000078384 | Dec 2000 | WO |
| WO 2001062326 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| WO 2001095965 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| WO 2001097892 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| WO 2001097893 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| WO 2002038221 | May 2002 | WO |
| WO 2002045784 | Jun 2002 | WO |
| PCTAU200300458 | Apr 2003 | WO |
| WO 2003090827 | Nov 2003 | WO |
| WO 2003105921 | Dec 2003 | WO |
| WO 2004022146 | Mar 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004041342 | May 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004073778 | Sep 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004078230 | Sep 2004 | WO |
| WO 2005053781 | Jun 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005063326 | Jul 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005063328 | Jul 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005086943 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005099801 | Oct 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005110220 | Nov 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005118040 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| PCTAU2006000031 | Jan 2006 | WO |
| PCTAU2006000417 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| PCTAU2006000770 | Jun 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006069415 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006074513 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006074516 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006099658 | Sep 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006130903 | Dec 2006 | WO |
| WO 2007009182 | Jan 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007041751 | Apr 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007041786 | Apr 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007048174 | May 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007053878 | May 2007 | WO |
| PCTAU2007001051 | Jul 2007 | WO |
| PCTAU2007001936 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007143772 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007145534 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| WO 2008007985 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008011682 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008011683 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008014543 | Feb 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008040050 | Apr 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008070929 | Jun 2008 | WO |
| WO 2009059353 | May 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009108994 | Sep 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009109004 | Sep 2009 | WO |
| WO 2010028425 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Office Action dated Jul. 14, 2022 issued in European Application No. 17176525.8 (4 pages). |
| Proceeding Correspondence mailed Nov. 23, 2021 in corresponding NZ Application 754622, including Opponent's Nov. 22, 2021 correspondence (6 pages). |
| Proceeding Correspondence mailed Jan. 28, 2022 in corresponding NZ Application 754622, including First Amended Counterstatement dated Dec. 22, 2021, and Opponent's Dec. 23, 2021 comments (21 pages). |
| Notice of Opposition to Grant of Patent mailed Jun. 28, 2021 in corresponding NZ Application 754622 (3 pages). |
| Extension of Time Granted mailed Jun. 28, 2021 in corresponding NZ Application 754622 (1 page). |
| Statement of Case mailed Aug. 27, 2021 in corresponding NZ Application 754622 (11 pages). |
| Deadline for Counterstatement mailed Aug. 27, 2021 in corresponding NZ Application 754622 (2 pages). |
| First Examination Report dated Jan. 21, 2021 in corresponding NZ Application 771895 (2 pages). |
| Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Feb. 5, 2021 in corresponding EP Application 17176525.8 (6 pages). |
| NZ First Examination Report dated Aug. 8, 2019 in corresponding NZ Application 754622. |
| A Counterstatement issued in corresponding New Zealand Application No. 722816 dated Dec. 5, 2018, with proposed claim amendments (29 pages). |
| A Letter to IPONZ filed by Baldwins on behalf of Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Limited in corresponding New Zealand Application No. 722816 dated Dec. 18, 2018, (4 pages). |
| A Proceeding Correspondence issued in corresponding New Zealand Application No. 722816, dated Jan. 28, 2019 (1 page). |
| A Statement of Case issued Aug. 23, 2018 in a corresponding New Zealand Application No. 722816, (20 pages). |
| A Deadline for Counterstatement issued Sep. 12, 2018 in a corresponding New Zealand Application No. 722816 (1 page). |
| An Extended European Search Report dated Apr. 24, 2018, in a corresponding European Patent Application No. 17176525.8 (8 pages). |
| A Notice of Opposition to Grant of Patent (Section 21) dated Jun. 22, 2018, issued in a corresponding New Zealand Patent Application No. 722816 (2 pages). |
| A Third Office Action dated Jun. 7, 2017 in a corresponding Chinese Application No. 201410757943.9 (5 pages), and an English translation thereof (4 pages). |
| Deadline for Counterstatement issued May 15, 2017 in a corresponding New Zealand Application No. 706053 (2 pages), forwarding a Second Notice of Opposition (2 pages) and a Statement of Case dated Apr. 28, 2017 (12 pages). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/385,701, filed Aug. 2003, Berthon-Jones et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/533,928, filed Jul. 2005, Berthon-Jones. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/584,711, filed Dec. 2004, Davidson. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/655,622, filed Sep. 2003, Lithgow. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/781,929, filed Jan. 2008, Gunaratnam et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/871,929, filed Feb. 2004, Surjaatmadja. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/080,446, filed Jul. 2005, Ging et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/447,295, filed Jun. 2006, Lubke et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/474,415, filed Jun. 2006, Davidson et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/491,016, filed Feb. 2007, Kwok et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/597,909, filed Jul. 2007, Worboys. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/703,082, filed Feb. 2007, Davidson. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/878,932, filed Jul. 2007, Veliss et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/878,933, filed Jul. 2007, Veliss et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/081,696, filed Apr. 2008, Davidson et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/085,191, filed May 2008, Kwok et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/309,696, filed Jan. 2009, Kwok et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/382,517, filed Mar. 2009, Lithgow. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/448,250, filed Jun. 2009, Veliss et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/461,448, filed Aug. 2009, Berthon-Jones. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/478,537, filed Jun. 2009, Kooij et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/656,466, filed Jan. 2010, Biener et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/700,878, filed Feb. 2010, Davidson et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/424,686, filed Nov. 2002, Lithgow. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/483,622, filed Jul. 2003, Kwok et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/533,214, filed Dec. 2003, Drew. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/634,802, filed Dec. 2004, Chandran. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/645,672, filed Jan. 2005, Chandran. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/795,615, filed Apr. 2006, Wdson et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/833,841, filed Jul. 2006, Veliss. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/835,442, filed Aug. 2006, Selvarajan et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/852,649, filed Oct. 2006, Selvarajan et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/874,968, filed Dec. 2006, Kwok et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/907,856, filed Apr. 2007, Davidson et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/924,241, filed May 2007, Kwok et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/929,393, filed Jun. 2007, Kwok et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/935,336, filed Aug. 2007, Davidson et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/213,326, filed May 2009, Dravitzki et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/222,711, filed Jul. 2009, Dravitzki et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/263,175, filed Nov. 2009, Dravitzki et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/272,162, filed Aug. 2009, Dravitzki et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/272,250, filed Sep. 2009, Dravitzki et al. |
| Notice of Opposition to Grant of Patent (Section 21) (2 pages), Application Under Regulation 168 for Extension of Time (1 page), and Grant of extension of time (1 page), issued Feb. 28, 2017 in a corresponding New Zealand Application No. 706053. |
| A Second Office Action dated Dec. 9, 2016 in a corresponding Chinese Application No. 201410757943.9 (8 pages), and an English translation thereof (8 pages). |
| Further Examination Report dated Jun. 30, 2016 in a corresponding New Zealand Application No. 706053 (3 pages). |
| Notification of the First Office Action dated Mar. 25, 2016 in a corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201410757943.9 (5 pages), and an English translation thereof (7 pages). |
| Sixth Office Action dated Apr. 30, 2015 in a corresponding Chinese Application No. 200810129969.3, and English translation thereof (8 pages). |
| First Examination Report dated Mar. 30, 2015 issued in a corresponding New Zealand Application No. 706053 (2 pages). |
| Decision to Refuse a European Patent Application issued in corresponding European Application No. 11 191 742.3-1662, dated Feb. 11, 2015. |
| Minutes of the Oral Proceedings issued in corresponding European Application No. 11 191 742.3-1662, dated Feb. 11, 2015. |
| Further Examination Report dated Jan. 21, 2015 issued in corresponding New Zealand Application No. 615814 (2 pages). |
| Decision of Rejection dated Aug. 26, 2014 in corresponding Chinese Application No. 200810129969.3, with English translation thereof. |
| Office Action issued in corresponding Chinese Application No. 200810129969.3, dated Apr. 25, 2014, with English translation thereof. |
| Further Examination Report issued in corresponding New Zealand Application No. 599563 dated May 6, 2014. |
| Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings issued in corresponding European Application No. 11191742.3 dated Jun. 10, 2014. |
| Fourth Office Action issued in corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 200810129969.3 dated Jan. 8, 2014 with English-language translation. |
| Communication dated Jul. 18, 2013 in European Application No. 11 191 742.3 (4 pages). |
| Communication dated Aug. 9, 2013 in European Application No. 11 191 782.9 (5 pages). |
| Notification of the Second Office Action dated Dec. 3, 2012, in Chinese Application No. 200810129969.3, with English Translation (8 pages). |
| Patent Examination Report No. 1 dated Aug. 24, 2012 in Australian Application No. 2008203372 (4 pages). |
| Extended European Search Report dated Apr. 18, 2012 in European Application No. 11191742.3 (6 pages). |
| Office Action issued in related Chinese Application No. 200810129969.3 (dated Feb. 14, 2012). |
| Office Action issued in a related European Application No. 08161249.1 (dated May 10, 2011). |
| “Ear Loop Face Mask.” |
| Adam J. Singer MD et al. “The Cyanoacrylate Topical Skin Adhesives,” American Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 26, 2008, pp. 490-496. |
| Webster's Third New International Dictionary, 1993, Dictionary definition for adjustable, bendable, and mild steel. |
| ComfortLite™, Respironics, http://comfortlite.respironics.com. |
| ComfortLite™ 2, Respironics, http://comfortlite2.respironics.com. |
| If You Hate CPAP! You Need CPAP Pro®, www.cpappro.com. |
| Webster's New World Dictionary, Third College Edition 1988, definition for engaged and flexible. |
| EP Supplementary Search Report issued in EP Application 03793493, dated Dec. 2, 2009. |
| European Search Report filed on Jul. 27, 2009 in EP Application No. 07784697.0. |
| Examination Report filed in New Zealand Application 539836, dated Aug. 25, 2005. |
| Examiner's Report No. 3 dated Nov. 18, 2009 in New Zealand Application No. 2003275762. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Sep. 3, 2009 in corresponding EP Application No. 09161984.1. |
| Extended European Search Report. Application No. EP 08154854, dated Nov. 27, 2008. |
| Fisher and Paykel Col.—Product Family—http://www.fphcare.com/osa/products.asp/. |
| Hans Rudolph, Inc.—Mask Products—http://www.rudolphke.com/products.php?category=MASKS. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/AU2004/001832, dated Jul. 3, 2006. |
| International Search Report for PCT/AU2005/000803, dated Jun. 30, 2005. |
| International Search Report filed in PCT/AU2006/000770, dated Aug. 3, 2006. |
| International Search Report for PCT/AU2007/001052, dated Oct. 9, 2007. |
| International Search Report for PCT/AU2007/001051, dated Nov. 5, 2007. |
| International Search Report for PCT/AU2004/001832, dated Mar. 24, 2005. |
| International Search Report for PCT/AU2007/001936, dated Mar. 4, 2008. |
| Joel W. Beam, “Tissue Adhesives for Simple Traumatic Lacerations,” Journal of Athletic Training, 2008, vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 222-224. |
| Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary definition of moveable from the 14th century. |
| Office Action dated Dec. 22, 2009 in European Appln. No. 04802133.1. |
| ResMed Co.—Mask Products—httg://resmed.com/portal /site/ResMedUS/index. jsp? . . . . |
| Respironics Co.—Mask Family—http://masksfamily.respironics.com/. |
| SNAPP Nasal Interface, Tiara Medical Systems, Inc.—http://www.tiaramed.com/asp_shops/shopdisplayproducts.asp?id=109&cat=SNAPP%2A+Nasal+Interface. |
| Subbu Venkatraman et al., “Review Skin Adhesives and Skin Adhesion a. Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems,” Biomaterials, vol. 19, 1998, pp. 1119-1136. |
| Supplementary European Search Report dated Sep. 8, 2009 in European Appln. No. 04802133.1. |
| Supplementary Search Report issued in European Appln. 05746824.1, dated Dec. 17, 2009. |
| Supplementary European Search Report dated Dec. 18, 2009 in European Application No. 03810331.3. |
| Unsolicited email from Elson Silva, PhD, dated Mar. 28, 2008, “Requesting IDS of U.S. Pat. No. 6,766,817 for patents on fluids moving on porosity by Unsaturated Hydraulic Flow,” (email provided in both HTML and plain text format). |
| International Search Report PCT/AU2003/001163, dated Nov. 4, 2003. |
| International Search Report PCT/AU2003/001471, dated Feb. 12, 2004. |
| International Search Report PCT/AU2009/000240, dated May 21, 2009. |
| International Search Report PCT/AU2009/000262, dated Jun. 9, 2009. |
| International Search Report PCT/AU2009/001144, dated Dec. 18, 2009. |
| EP Summons to Oral Proceedings Pursuant to Rule 115(1) EPC in Appeal No. T1813/15-3.2.02 mailed Apr. 23, 2020 in EP Application 11191742.3. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20220387743 A1 | Dec 2022 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61071512 | May 2008 | US | |
| 61064818 | Mar 2008 | US | |
| 61006409 | Jan 2008 | US | |
| 60996160 | Nov 2007 | US | |
| 60935179 | Jul 2007 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 17689102 | Mar 2022 | US |
| Child | 17820253 | US | |
| Parent | 16872442 | May 2020 | US |
| Child | 17689102 | US | |
| Parent | 15288510 | Oct 2016 | US |
| Child | 16872442 | US | |
| Parent | 12219852 | Jul 2008 | US |
| Child | 15288510 | US |
