The present application claims priority, under 35 U.S.C. §119(a), of European Application No. 14306400.4 which was filed Sep. 11, 2014 and which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
The present disclosure is concerned with patient support apparatus and particularly with a patient detection system for detecting the presence of a patient on a patient-carrying surface of the patient support apparatus. Embodiments disclosed herein relate to apparatus for determining the force or pressure applied to the support deck by a patient on the patient support apparatus and means to thereby determine a location for the center of gravity of a patient on the patient support apparatus.
It is sometimes desirable to monitor the whereabouts of a patient, particularly when a doctor or other care giver has ordered that the patient remain on a patient-support device such as a hospital bed, a stretcher, or other device for carrying the patient. Several devices have been developed for detecting a patient exit from a patient-support device. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,276,432 to Travis discloses a bed exit detection mechanism for a hospital bed that relies on signals from load cells under the mattress supporting portion on the upper frame of the bed. The load cells support the upper bed frame and also any loads which are in turn supported by the frame, including a patient. This device uses the weight measured by each load cell to determine whether the center of gravity of the patient is over a predetermined region of the patient-carrying surface of the hospital bed. In addition, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,934,468 and 4,953,244, disclose a hospital bed having a support frame and a weigh frame mounted on the support frame by load cells.
Arrangements such as that of U.S. Pat. No. 5,276,432 comprising a weigh frame or scales under the upper bed frame require expensive components and are therefore expensive. They are also difficult to retrofit to existing beds.
It is also known to monitor the position of a person by attaching a portion of a transmitter/receiver system to the person being monitored so that when the person and thus the portion of the system attached to the person leaves a designated area, the remaining portion of the system detects the departure of the portion and thus the departure of the person and provides an indication of the person's departure. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,519,380 to Edwards discloses a bracelet module that is worn by the monitored person so that when the person and the bracelet module move outside of the monitored volume, an indication of departure is provided.
It is also known to monitor the position of a patient on a bed using bladders or other fluid-carrying devices positioned to lie between the patient and the top of the mattress or other patient support surface of the bed. Such bladders or fluid-carrying devices are in fluid communication with a pressure sensor so that the pressure sensor registers a bladder pressure in response to the patient's weight, the bladder pressure indicating the presence or absence of the patient on the bladder. For example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,140,309 and 5,184,122, both to Gusakov, each disclose an apparatus including resilient means in the form of a tube, cell or other form of fluid passage adapted to allow fluid such as air to flow from an inlet through the outlet when a passage is not collapsed by the weight of a patient. Indicating means indicate changes in pressure in the fluid supplied by the fluid supplying means, such as when the weight of a patient collapses the passage through the resilient means. By providing resilient means having a plurality of tubes, cells or other fluid passages and separate indicating means for each resilient means, the position of the patient relative to each resilient means can be monitored.
There are also several known systems that include sensors positioned to lie immediately beneath the patient (between the patient and the mattress or other patient support surface) and that provide electrical signals in response to the weight detected by the sensor so that an output signal indicating a significant change of weight acting against the sensor indicates movement of the patient to a position away from the sensor or to a position on top of the sensor. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,353,012 to Barham et al.; Swartout disclose a system which includes a sensor that provides an output signal in response to a change in the weight acting against the sensor.
Finally, it is also known to provide capacitive motion sensors for monitoring the movements of a person and even for measuring respiration, heartbeat, and body position of the person. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,320,766 to Alihanka et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 5,448,996 to Bellin et al. each disclose patient monitors including capacitive sensors. The device disclosed by the Alihanka patent can indicate that movement has occurred but cannot indicate what movement occurred or the position of the body when no movement is occurring, and the Bellin patent likewise can indicate movement but not position of the patient or that a patient has exited the bed.
Improvements in bed mattress designs have significantly reduced peak interface pressure between the patient and the mattress by maximizing the area over which the weight of the patient is distributed rather than concentrating the interface pressure at points along the patient, for example, the patient's head, shoulder blades and heels. In addition, recent patient population data indicates that some patients in general weigh less than in the past. Patient detection systems that rely on the weight of the patient to allow the sensor to detect the patient are rendered less effective as mattresses become more efficient at distributing the weight of the patient across the surface of the mattress and as the weight of the patient decreases. In addition, while it is desirable to minimize the interface pressure of high interface pressure points between the patient and the mattress by distributing the weight of the patient across the mattress, for example, by using mattresses including air bladder supports, interposing a sensor between the top surface of the mattress and the patient significantly reduces the effectiveness of the mattress at distributing the weight of the patient. In addition, for applications in which it is desirable to keep the patient dry and maintain the temperature of the patient at a desired temperature through the use of a “low air loss” mattress that allows a very small amount of air to escape the mattress and blow on the patient, interposing a sensor between the patient and the mattress reduces the effectiveness of the low air loss feature.
What is needed is a sensor that can sense the position of a patient relative to a patient-carrying surface of a patient-support device that can be positioned to lie away from the patient allowing the sensor to be placed away from the patient-carrying surface. In addition, the sensor should not require the attachment of a portion of the system to the patient.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,067,019 to Scott discloses a bed exit detection apparatus including a number of bed position sensors arranged underneath the mattress between the mattress and the mattress support frame or surface. The sensors each comprise separated conducting plates which together form a capacitor having a capacitor gap whose dielectric consent is affected by the absence or presence of a portion of a human body arranged above, but separated by the mattress from the respective sensor.
The complicated dielectric/capacitive sensor arrangement of Scott was considered necessary in order to overcome the perceived difficulties associated with sensing for the absence or presence of a body remote from the sensors (i.e. separated therefrom by the mattress) and in which the presence of the mattress would distribute the weight of the patient and thereby create difficulties.
The present application, in a first aspect, discloses a patient support apparatus comprising a substantially rigid support deck for supporting a patient support element, and at least one sensing element arranged on the support deck, wherein the or each sensing element determines the force or pressure applied to it by the patient support element and a patient on the patient support element, and the apparatus includes one or more processors coupled to the at least one sensing element for determining a location for the center of gravity of a patient on the patient support element from the sensing element outputs.
Optionally, the patient support apparatus comprises at least two sensing elements. Optionally, three or more sensing elements may be used. The sensing elements may be arranged such that the center of gravity of a combined patient and mattress will be, when the patient is in a normal safe position, located within an area bounded by the sensing element. The outputs from the sensing elements are, together, enough to determine the location of the center of gravity and thereby monitor the position of a patient.
The inventor of the subject application has appreciated that, contrary to the existing technical prejudice, it is possible to adequately and safely monitor a patient's position using the at least one sensing element arranged between a substantially rigid support deck and a patient support element for example a mattress. The elements necessary to implement such a system on a bed are relatively inexpensive and while such an arrangement might be less accurate than some of the known arrangements, it is sufficiently accurate and robust for inexpensive patient portion monitoring and detecting bed exit by a patient.
Optionally, the patient support element is a mattress.
Optionally, at least two of the at least three sensing elements are supported on a sensing pad or board. A sensing board can be easily made and then retro-fitted to existing beds or patient support apparatus.
Optionally, the apparatus includes two sensing boards or pads and wherein each sensing board or pad includes at least two sensing elements. This arrangement has enough sensors in different locations which allow for a sufficiently accurate determination from the loads measured at each sensing element of the location of the center of gravity of a mattress or patient support element (with or without a patient on its upper surface). Optionally, the sensing pad or board is a substantially rigid board and the sensing elements are attached to the underside of the board.
Optionally, one sensing board or pad is located on the support deck so that, in use, it is underneath the seat of a patient in a normal supine or lying down position on the patient support element, and a second sensing board or pad is located on the support deck so that, in use, it is underneath the thighs of a patient in a normal supine or lying down position on the patient support element. It is believed that the inventor of the subject application is the first to determine that such an arrangement allows for a sufficiently accurate determination of the location of the center of gravity without the need for significant numbers of sensors. This makes for a relatively inexpensive system for monitoring a patient on a patient support apparatus.
Optionally, the sensing board or pad is substantially rectangular and includes four sensing elements, each of the four sensing elements being at or near each of the four corners of the sensing board or pad. This is a robust and easy to make arrangement.
Optionally, the sensing elements are thin flexible sensing elements attached to or integral with the bottom surface of the mattress. Optionally the thin flexible sensing elements are integral with or attached to the lower surface of the mattress.
Optionally, the sensing elements are selected from the group comprising the following types of load cell sensing elements: strain gauge sensors, extensometers, bending beam sensors, hall-effect sensors and/or capacitive sensors.
Optionally, the sensing elements are capacitive sensors. Such sensors can be flexible and thin and therefore are suitable for integration with, or attachment to, a mattress or other patient support element.
The patient support apparatus, in a second aspect, comprises a substantially rigid support deck for supporting a patient support element and a first sensing element and a second sensing element separated from one another in a direction along the width of the patient support apparatus. Each sensing element is configured to determine, in use, the force or pressure applied to it by the patient support element and a patient on the patient support element. One or more processors are coupled to the sensing elements, the one or more processors being configured to determine or monitor the location for the center of gravity of a patient on the patient support element, along the width of the patient support apparatus between the sensors, based upon outputs of the first and second sensing elements; and to provide an output to activate an alarm when the location of the center of gravity along the width of the patient support apparatus is outside a predetermined range. This allows an alarm to be activated if a patient moves in a lateral direction, for example if they attempt to move towards the sides of the support apparatus, or they attempt to exit the bed.
Optionally, the one or more processors may be further configured to determine or monitor a load variation, being a variation in the total force applied to the sensing elements by the patient support element and a patient on the patient support element, and to provide an output to activate an alarm if the load variation exceeds a predetermined value. The monitoring of load variation allows further deductions to be made about the patient positioning.
Optionally, the one or more processors are configured to receive user input selecting one of two or more presets, each preset corresponding to a patient movement sensitivity level and comprising a predetermined range and/or predetermined load variation value stored on a memory; and to access the memory to receive the parameters associated with the selected preset. Different levels of sensitivity can therefore be provided depending upon the condition of the patient.
The patient support apparatus may optionally further comprise an adjustable back rest, and the one or more processors may be further configured to receive an input indicative of the angle of the back rest and to adjust the load variation or center of gravity by an amount dependent upon the angle of the back rest. The input may be provided by an accelerometer coupled to the back rest, the one or more processors being configured to receive an output from the accelerometer and to determine the angle of the back rest based on said output.
The patient support apparatus may optionally further comprise an adjustable back rest, and the one or more processors may be further configured to receive an input indicative of the angle of the back rest and to adjust the load variation by an amount dependent upon the change in angle of the back rest. The input may be provided by an accelerometer coupled to the back rest, the one or more processors being configured to receive an output from the accelerometer and to determine the angle of the back rest based on said output.
Optionally the one or more processors may be further configured to receive an input indicative of the type of patient support element and to adjust the location for the center of gravity based upon the input. For example, where the patient support element is a mattress the input may indicate whether the mattress is a foam mattress or an air mattress.
Optionally the patient support apparatus may further comprise a third sensing element and a fourth sensing element separated from one another in a direction along the width of the patient support apparatus, the third sensing element and the fourth sensing element being separated from the first sensing element and the second sensing element in a direction along the length of the patient support apparatus, the one or more processors being configured to determine the location for the center of gravity of a patient on the patient support element, along the width of the patient support apparatus, based upon outputs of the first, second, third and fourth sensing elements.
According to the second aspect a computer program may be provided which when executed on the one or more processors of the patient support apparatus described above or below causes it to carry out the methods described herein. In particular, the computer program may cause the patient support apparatus to determine the location for the center of gravity of a patient on the patient support element, along the width of the patient support apparatus, based upon outputs of the first and second sensing elements; and provide an output to activate an alarm when the location of the center of gravity along the width of the patient support apparatus is outside a predetermined range.
The present application, in a third aspect, provides a sensing board for use with a patient support apparatus to monitor the position of a patient on the patient support apparatus, the sensing board comprising a substantially rigid board for location on the patient support apparatus under a patient support element on the patient support apparatus and wherein the rigid board includes at least one sensing element that determines the force or pressure applied to it by the patient support element and a patient on the patient support element, and wherein the sensing board is coupled to data processing means for determining a location for the center of gravity of a patient on the patient support element from the sensing element outputs.
Such a sensing board can be easily retro-fitted to existing beds and provides a simple, robust and inexpensive system for patient position monitoring.
Optionally, the sensing board includes two or more sensing elements.
Optionally, the sensing elements are on the underside of the substantially rigid board.
Optionally, the sensing elements are selected from the group comprising the following types of load cell sensing elements: strain gauge sensors, extensometers, bending beam sensors, hall-effect sensors and/or capacitive sensors.
Optionally, the sensing board has at least two sensing elements and those two sensing elements are strain gauges.
The present application, in a fourth aspect, provides a system for sensing movement and/or inactivity of a patient on a patient support surface incorporating any embodiment of the apparatus described herein. Such a system can form part of a care protocol for reducing the risk of the bed sores and pressure ulcers associated with prolonged periods of patient inactivity.
Optionally, the system includes an arrangement configured to give a warning or alarm when the system detects a period of inactivity of a pre-defined length.
Embodiments disclosed herein, in their various aspects, will now be described by way of non-limiting examples with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
A patient detection system according to the present disclosure could be used to monitor the position of a patient relative to a patient-carrying surface of a bed as shown in the attached Figs. The system could also be used to determine position relative to the patient-carrying surfaces of other patient-support devices including chairs, wheelchairs, stretchers, operating tables, incubators, radiant warmers and other patient-support devices relative to which a caregiver may wish to monitor the presence or absence and the position of a patient.
Referring to
The sensing arrangement 8 consists of a number of separate and independently operable load cells 9 which monitor the force or pressure exerted on their upper surface by the mattress 1 and a patient (not shown) on that mattress. The output from each load cell 9 is connected to patient position monitoring data processing hardware 10 and software 11 encompassed within a patient position monitoring unit 2.
Referring to
Referring to
The bed control box includes a buzzer 17 or alarm for warning a care giver if the patient position indicates a dangerous or potentially dangerous position, or bed exit is imminent or has happened. Bed exit is imminent when the center of gravity moves towards the edge of the bed. A center of gravity moving or moved towards the edge of the bed also indicates a potentially dangerous position with a possible fall from the bed being imminent or more likely. The bed control box also controls the actuators which control the height and orientation of the support deck and has a control pad for doing that. The control panel may be fixed to the side of the bed or be remote from the bed and the remaining elements of the bed control box may be located on the bed frame or underneath the support deck.
Referring to
When a patient is lying flat on the bed in a normal position, the typical maximum proportion of the patient load or weight on the different sections is, 15%, 15%, 25% and 45% of the patient mass for, respectively, the deck leg section 19, deck thigh section 20, deck seat section 21 and deck back rest section 22. The center of gravity of the entire patient can therefore be determined from the loads on the load cells 9 of the thigh 14 and seat 13 sensing boards.
The embodiment of
The alternative embodiments illustrated in
The functionality of the patient position monitoring hardware 10 and software 11 will now be described in relation to an embodiment that uses two detection boards of the sort shown in
The system functions by monitoring variables determined based upon output from the sensors. Optionally, these variables may include a patient gravity center position and patient weight. One or more detection modes can be defined and implemented using the system based upon user selection, each detection mode having different predetermined parameters. These detection modes may include: a high sensitivity mode to monitor and alert for relatively small movements of a patient, applicable to patients who have tubes in their mouths or throats for example; a medium sensitivity mode used to monitor mobile patients and alert a caregiver if the patient attempts to sit up, or roll towards a side of the bed; and a low sensitivity bed exit mode used to monitor mobile patients to ensure they remain “in bed”.
As an example, the following sensors and values may be used. SS1 to SS4 refer to the sensors on the seat board, with SS1 corresponding to the left hand side nearest to the head side of the board, SS2 corresponding to the left hand side nearest to the feet side of the board, SS3 corresponding to the right hand side nearest to the feet side of the board and SS4 corresponding to the right hand side nearest to the head side of the board. ST1 to ST4 refer to corresponding sensors, in corresponding respective positions, on the thigh board. SSR and SSL refer to the sum of the values of the right hand side seat sensors (Σ SS3 SS4) and left hand side seat sensors (Σ SS1 SS2) respectively. STR and STL refer to the sum of the values of the right hand side thigh seat sensors (Σ ST3 ST4) and left hand side seat sensors (Σ ST1 ST2) respectively. The global weight, Gw, is the sum of the values for the various sensors, and in this example is the sum of the left and right hand values for both boards (SSL+SSR+STL+STR). The center of gravity, Gc, may be calculated in any appropriate manner, and for example as a function of the sum of the values of the sensors, the global weight and the width of the respective sensor boards, or the lateral separation between the left and right hand sensors on the boards. For example, Gc may be calculated as follows:
Where Wsb and Wtb are respectively the width of the seat and thigh boards, or the lateral separation between the left and right hand sensors on the boards.
In order to initiate patient monitoring the system may optionally require a calibration to be carried out. The output values of the sensors are determined for both boards with only the patient support element (e.g. a mattress) in position. This provides the initial “zero” values for the sensors without the patient, which may be stored in a memory accessible by the hardware 10. The patient is then positioned on the patient support element in a centered position, appropriately aligned.
In order to correctly position the patient, the monitoring system may optionally rely upon correct positioning by the caregiver, for example by aligning the patient using markings provided on the patient support element. As an example, markings may be provided to align the patient's hips in the desired position. Alternatively, or in addition, the monitoring system may be configured to analyze the sensor outputs to determine whether the patient is in the correct position, within a predetermined tolerance, for the system to start monitoring patient positioning.
In particular, the monitoring system may be configured to compare the right hand side sensor values (SSR, STR) and left hand side sensor values (SSL, STL) for a given board to determine whether the patient is adequately aligned. This may involve determining an initial value for the center of gravity, Gc, and ensuring that it is within a predetermined tolerance range, such as within 100 mm of the center of the support apparatus measured along its width. The system may include a visual and/or audio output indicative of whether the patient is correctly positioned within the predetermined tolerance range. For example, one or more LEDs may indicate by steady illumination that the patient is correctly positioned and may blink or flash to indicate that the patient is not correctly positioned. A failure indication requires the caregiver to reposition the patient correctly, or may be indicative of other faults such as a system overload, sensor shock or sensor deterioration.
In addition to applying an initiation tolerance for the position of the center of gravity, the monitoring system may be further configured to apply a minimum weight requirement, whereby the total weight Gw must exceed a particular value for the system to activate. Tests have found that center of gravity calculations can become unstable if a minimum weight requirement is not applied. The minimum weight may be determined by experiment, for example by comparing global patient weights as detected by the sensors with the actual patient weights. The minimum weight is compared against the total weight detected by the seat and thigh sections to determine if the minimum weight requirement is met. An example minimum weight could be 6 kg.
Once the patient has been correctly positioned, and the minimum weight requirement is met, initial sensor values are saved. The individual values themselves may be saved, or combined initial values SSLinit, SSRinit, STLinit and STRinit may be saved. In addition, initial values Gw_init and Gc_init for Gw and Gc may be saved as well as a value BA_init for the initial backrest angle as will be described below.
The monitoring system is then ready to receive input indicative of the detection sensitivity level desired for the patient. The monitoring system functions by periodically determining whether the sensor outputs indicate the patient has moved from a desired position. The determination can be made based upon a change in center of gravity, Gc, a change in global weight Gw, or a combination of the two.
A value for the center of gravity, Gc, for a patient can be calculated as above, or in any suitable manner, based on the sensor outputs. The monitoring system determines whether the value for Gc falls within a predetermined range of values. In the present embodiment Gc may be calculated only in a single dimension, laterally along the width of the support apparatus locating the position of Gc between the sensors. In other embodiments Gc could be calculated in two dimensions, with a range applying to the position of Gc within each of the desired dimensions. For example, the position of the center of gravity along the length of the support apparatus may also be determined, and threshold parameters applied thereto in the same manner as described for the width of the apparatus.
In addition, or as an alternative, to using Gc the system may use a shift in total weight Gw as a parameter for determining whether a patient has moved from a desired position. Variation in both Gc and Gw parameters may be determined relative to the initial values determined during initial patient placement, or could be compared to a predetermined reference value.
A plurality of different preset detection levels are provided, depending upon the patient condition. The presets use different permissible value ranges for Gc and/or Gw to provide different sensitivities to patient movement. Examples of different detection levels are provided below.
A first detection level may be limited to a patient moving a relatively small amount within a predefined area A of the patient support apparatus. This detection level can be used when the caregiver wishes to be alerted when the patient begins to move.
A lateral movement of Gc along the width of the patient support apparatus may be permitted within a relatively small tolerance, VL1_DX, for example±50 mm, before an alarm is activated. In particular, the alarm may be activated if Gc−Gc_init falls outside±VL1_DX. In this way, an alarm is initiated when the patient moves towards either side of the patient support apparatus.
In addition, the first detection level may also activate an alarm if the patient load Gw varies by a predetermined amount VL1_LV from the initial value, such as a 15% variation. For each state change of the system (new values of sensor signals), the algorithm analyzes the minimum and maximum values to calculate the load variation. If the variation is greater than 15% the alarm is triggered. A variation of Gw, as detected by the sensor boards, indicates a longitudinal displacement of the patient's weight along the bed. In this way, an alarm is initiated when the patient moves away from the head section such as by sitting up in bed.
A second detection level may permit the patient to move by an amount greater than the first detection level, allowing the patient to move within an area B, larger than area A, before an alarm is activated.
According to the second detection level the lateral movement of Gc may be permitted within a larger tolerance, VL2_DX, for example ±250 mm. In particular, the alarm may be activated if Gc−Gc_init falls outside ±VL2_DX.
In addition, the second detection level may also activate an alarm if the total patient load Gw varies by a predetermined amount from the initial value, such as a 50% variation. In particular, the variation may be a decrease in the total patient load. This defines a trigger limit when the patient moves in the longitudinal direction of the bed towards the head or the foot, as weight shifts from the seat and thigh board sections when the patient repositions.
In this way, according to the second detection level, an alarm is activated when the patient center of gravity moves outside an area B, bigger than area A, and/or more than a predetermined amount of the patient weight shifts from the support apparatus. The alarm activates when the patient moves away from the center of the bed towards an egress point and can be used when a caregiver wishes to be alerted of an attempted egress by the patient.
A third detection level may trigger the alarm when the variation in Gw is over a given threshold such that the alarm activates when the patient's weight shifts significantly off the frame of the bed. This mode can be used when a caregiver wishes the patient to move freely within the bed, but to be alerted when the patient leaves the bed.
In order to provide an alarm before the patient exits the bed, the system needs to detect the load variation and a percentage of weight discharged from the bed. Therefore, for the third detection level, the system may trigger the alarm when a predetermined proportion, such as 70%, of the patient's load moves out of the bed. The third detection level may therefore allow a weight shift greater than the second detection level before activating the alarm.
An alarm delay functionality may optionally be provided in conjunction with one or more of the detection levels. This allows the patient to reposition without the alarm activating provided that they do so within a predetermined amount of time. Delays may be included to improve overall system stability and to prevent false alarms occurring.
As an example, with the third detection level it may be desirable for the patient to be able to get up and leave the bed for a predetermined period of time before the alarm is activated. If the patient returns to a position within the tolerances for the particular level then supervision by the system resumes without the alarm being activated. The delay, in this case, may be a number of minutes, such as 30 minutes.
A relatively short delay may be desirable in some embodiments, on the order of a few seconds, to prevent small shifts in patient position setting off the alarm. The delay may be between 0.5 and 5 seconds, and may be around 1.5 seconds, for example. Such delays may be particularly desirable in conjunction with detection levels of the second and third type, where the patient is expected to have some degree of mobility.
The delay may be user selectable, for example at the time of choosing the detection level being applied to the patient.
The delay may also, or alternatively, be dependent upon the positioning of Gc, such that the delay is only applied when the variation in Gc is within a predetermined limit. As an example, the delay may be applied to the third detection level when Gc varies by 250 mm. If Gc varies by more than this amount then the alarm may not be delayed, such that the alarm is more reactive. This accommodates for patients shifting their weight, and assumes that a patient whose weight is positioned near to the edge of the bed is more likely to be trying to exit the bed such that a change in global weight requires immediate alert to the care giver.
In order to determine whether an alarm is to be activated the system processor analyses all the signals provided by or to the system, including detection signals (DS) from the sensors and selection signals from a user input device such as a control panel. The selection signals include a selected detection level (SL) and may also include a selected delay (SD). The analysis compares the signals with stored rules and triggers the alarm depending upon whether the rules are met. If the level detected is the same after all sensors refresh then the system is stable.
Optionally the values of the center of gravity, Gc, and/or the global weight, Gw, may be subject to corrections to account for one or more of the angle of a back rest and the type of patient support element used.
For embodiments in which the patient support apparatus includes an adjustable back rest, the back rest can move from between a first angle and a second angle, such as from a substantially flat position to an angle that supports a patient in a sitting position. The angle of the back rest can affect the distribution of the patient's weight on each of the sensor boards.
When the back rest is raised or lowered, the gravity center Gc is modified by the mattress mass supported by the backrest frame. To correct for this error a rule is applied to modify the center of gravity as a function of the angle of the backrest. The modified center of gravity may be calculated based on the backrest angle (BA) and the mattress weight (Mw), taking into account the detected weight of the patient. In particular, the backrest angle compensation to Gc may be calculated as: Gc_c=Gc*Gw/(Gw−Mw*sin2(BA)).
A correction to the value of the weight Gw can also be made, factoring in the back rest angle. In particular, a corrected value Gw_ref may be determined as a function of Gw_init and the change in backrest angle. To correct the load applied on the sensors when the backrest moves the corrected weight Gw_ref may be calculated as: Gw_ref=Gw_init*law(BA)/law(BA_init). Gw_init is the initial weight detected using the sensors when the system is activated, BA is the measured backrest angle, and BA_init is the initial backrest angle. The function “law(X)” is a predetermined function determined by experiment, with one example being: law(X)=(a*x^3+b*x^2+C*x+d)/d. The coefficients a, b, c and d are determined by experiment and may vary depending upon the type of mattress used.
The angle of the back rest may be determined continuously or at regular intervals using an accelerometer. It is possible to use a different type of device to detect the backrest position provided the device signal can be translated into an angle to allow the correction law to be applied. Other embodiments may allow the user to input a value indicative of the angle of the back rest, if this value is fixed whilst the patient is in the bed.
It has been appreciated that the type of patient support element may affect the distribution of weight of the patient and therefore may affect the calculated center of gravity. Therefore, the calculation of Gc, or alternatively the rule threshold values for Gc, may be corrected to account for the type of mattress. For example, the value of Gc may have a correction factor applied depending upon the type of mattress. In particular, the correction factor may differ depending upon whether the mattress is a foam or air variety.
It has been appreciated that for certain lateral positions foam mattresses tend to result in an absolute value for Gc that is too large (i.e. further from the center of the bed than it should be) and that air mattresses tend to result in an absolute value for Gc that is too small (i.e. closer to the center of the bed than it should be). Since different detection levels may rely upon different threshold values for Gc the correction applied based on mattress type may vary depending on the selected detection level. The caregiver may provide a selection indicative of the mattress type to the system at the initiation/calibration stage.
A method for using the monitoring system will now be described with reference to
Once the patient has been placed in the correct initial position the method moves on to a selection of the desired sensitivity level of the monitoring system. At step 903 the user selects the desired detection level by pressing the button 1005, the selection being indicated by LEDs 1003, 1004, 1006, 1007, 1008 or 1009 on the interface. In this example, three possibilities, SL1, SL2 and SL3 are provided, corresponding to levels 1, 2 and 3 described above. For certain detection levels, in this example SL3, there may also be an option at step 903 to select a desired delay value which will prevent the alarm from activating until the detected patient properties are outside the predetermined ranges of the particular detection level for the predetermined delay value. In this example LEDs 1006 to 1009 indicate respectively whether a delay of 0, 5, 10 or 15 minutes has been selected, although other delays are possible.
The monitoring system then begins monitoring the patient, the LED lights being illuminated to indicate the selected detection level. The alarm will now activate according to the detection thresholds defined in the variable parameters associated with the selected detection level. The initial sensor values may be saved at this point, or they may be saved earlier when the initial patient positioning has been completed.
The monitoring system periodically obtains the sensor values at step 905. The corrections required due to back rest angle and mattress type may also be optionally applied before the sensor values are used to calculate current values for Gc and Gw at step 906, which can be compared against the initial values, at step 907, to determine whether the patient parameters have moved outside the predetermined ranges specified by the selected detection level. The system repeatedly checks the patient parameters based upon the sensor values in accordance with the selected detection level.
Alarm activation 909 is determined in accordance with whether the patient parameters have fallen outside the predetermined ranges associated with the selected detection level. Alarm activation may factor in whether a delay 908 has been included. A mute button 1010 may be provided to deactivate the alarm manually.
Whilst the functionality of the patient position monitoring unit 2 has been described in relation to a patient support apparatus having two sensor boards each with four sensors it will be appreciated that more or fewer sensors can be used. Embodiments may, for example, use two sensors, laterally displaced from one another, such that a center of gravity along at least one dimension of the patient support apparatus, and optionally an overall indication of weight, can be determined.
The functionality of the patient position monitoring hardware 10 and software 11 has been described in relation to an embodiment of the sort shown in
The systems and arrangements described above can be used to detect movement by noting changes in the location of the center of gravity. They can therefore also be used to detect inactivity. In such a capacity they could form part of a system or care protocol to, for example, reduce the risk of pressure ulcers, bed sores and other ailments which are or can be associated with prolonged periods of inactivity or bed rest.
Hospitals have specific procedures to reduce the risk of pressure ulcers and other ailments which are associated with prolonged periods of inactivity. These include repositioning of the patient at defined intervals and/or the use of inflatable air mattresses such as those described in, for example, EP 2198822. However, it is not always easily and/or immediately recognized when a particular patient is at risk of developing bed sores, pressure ulcers and/or similar, and should therefore be placed on a bed with an air mattress of the type developed and available for reducing the risk of such ailments. Patients are often placed on simple non-inflatable foam or similar mattresses at the start of their hospital stay. The systems described above are particularly suitable for use with such a foam or standard mattress to detect prolonged inactivity and hence a risk of pressure ulcers, bed sores and/or the like. A system could be provided in which the arrangements for detecting the center of gravity and hence the movement of the center of gravity associated with movement of the patient above could be used to detect inactivity on a standard or foam mattress. When a defined prolonged period of inactivity is sensed or determined an alarm could be activated and/or a message displayed on a care giver screen prompting the care giver to alter the change to the standard mattress for an air mattress (or similar) designed to reduce the risk of bed sores etc, or reposition the patient.
Although certain illustrative embodiments have been described in detail above, variations and modifications exist within the scope and spirit of this disclosure as described and as defined in the following claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
14306400 | Sep 2014 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1969554 | Gloudemans | Aug 1934 | A |
2735291 | Guinn | Feb 1956 | A |
2784395 | Gorby | Mar 1957 | A |
2990899 | De Bella | Jul 1961 | A |
3096061 | Bertell | Jul 1963 | A |
3217818 | Engelsher et al. | Nov 1965 | A |
3338323 | Swersey | Aug 1967 | A |
3360062 | Potter | Dec 1967 | A |
3512595 | Laimins | May 1970 | A |
3589457 | Joos | Jun 1971 | A |
3656478 | Swersey | Apr 1972 | A |
3722611 | Tirkkonen | Mar 1973 | A |
3741328 | Andersson et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3766344 | Nevett | Oct 1973 | A |
3773124 | Bullivant | Nov 1973 | A |
3795284 | Mracek et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
3796208 | Bloice | Mar 1974 | A |
3852736 | Cook et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3876018 | Mracek et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3890958 | Fisler et al. | Jun 1975 | A |
3961201 | Rosenthal | Jun 1976 | A |
3961627 | Ernst et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
3961675 | Siegel | Jun 1976 | A |
3972320 | Kalman | Aug 1976 | A |
3991414 | Moran | Nov 1976 | A |
3991415 | Baar, Sr. | Nov 1976 | A |
3991746 | Hanna | Nov 1976 | A |
4006789 | Stultz et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
4015677 | Silva et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4020482 | Feldl | Apr 1977 | A |
4023633 | Swersey et al. | May 1977 | A |
4033420 | De Masters | Jul 1977 | A |
4067005 | Levy et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4129189 | Maglecic et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4140998 | Bettle | Feb 1979 | A |
4150326 | Engelberger et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4175263 | Triplett et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
4179692 | Vance | Dec 1979 | A |
4180803 | Wesemeyer et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4188621 | Heckelman et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4195287 | McCoy et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4196425 | Williams, Jr. et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4199792 | Satoh et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4228426 | Roberts | Oct 1980 | A |
4242672 | Gault | Dec 1980 | A |
4245651 | Frost | Jan 1981 | A |
4257035 | Yen | Mar 1981 | A |
4281730 | Swersey et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4282412 | Florin | Aug 1981 | A |
4290136 | Brunner et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4295133 | Vance | Oct 1981 | A |
4320766 | Alihanka et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4323064 | Hoenig et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4335468 | Foster et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4336533 | Wettach | Jun 1982 | A |
4346771 | Persson et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4350860 | Ueda | Sep 1982 | A |
4363368 | Paddon et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4419830 | Miller | Dec 1983 | A |
4420052 | Hale | Dec 1983 | A |
4426644 | Neumann et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4438823 | Hussels et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4475013 | Lee et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4482783 | Laimins | Nov 1984 | A |
4483404 | Weihs | Nov 1984 | A |
4484043 | Musick et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4492281 | Van Allen et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4519027 | Vogelsberg | May 1985 | A |
4539560 | Fleck et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4540057 | Freeman | Sep 1985 | A |
4550793 | Giles | Nov 1985 | A |
4551029 | Aizawa | Nov 1985 | A |
4551882 | Swersey et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4558181 | Blanchard et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4572006 | Wolfendale | Feb 1986 | A |
4577709 | Shibahara et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4583084 | Henderson et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4587739 | Holcomb et al. | May 1986 | A |
4597487 | Crosby et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4600066 | Griffen et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4601356 | Muccillo, Jr. | Jul 1986 | A |
4629015 | Fried et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4633237 | Tucknott et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4638307 | Swartout | Jan 1987 | A |
4638876 | Balduin et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4649759 | Lee | Mar 1987 | A |
4659233 | Nakamura et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4670864 | Hoffmann | Jun 1987 | A |
4679144 | Cox et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4696358 | Doerman et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4738325 | Bullivant et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4751754 | Bailey et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4757867 | Rosenthal et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4793428 | Swersey | Dec 1988 | A |
4796013 | Yasuda et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4805637 | Walthert | Feb 1989 | A |
4807558 | Swersey | Feb 1989 | A |
4845323 | Beggs | Jul 1989 | A |
4858622 | Osterweil | Aug 1989 | A |
4865581 | Lundquist et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4866356 | Altendorf | Sep 1989 | A |
4899840 | Boubille | Feb 1990 | A |
4907845 | Wood | Mar 1990 | A |
4934468 | Koerber, Sr. et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4947298 | Stephen | Aug 1990 | A |
4953244 | Koerber, Sr. et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4953277 | Crispin et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4961470 | Koerber, Sr. | Oct 1990 | A |
4967384 | Molinar et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4974692 | Carruth et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5007420 | Bird | Apr 1991 | A |
5019905 | Pshtissky et al. | May 1991 | A |
5033563 | Brainerd, Jr. et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5140309 | Gusakov | Aug 1992 | A |
5166679 | Vranish et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5183126 | Kellenbach | Feb 1993 | A |
5184112 | Gusakov | Feb 1993 | A |
5184122 | Decious et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5224561 | Ahl | Jul 1993 | A |
5232064 | Kroll et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5235319 | Hill et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5269388 | Reichow et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5276432 | Travis | Jan 1994 | A |
5353012 | Barham et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5393935 | Hasty et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5393938 | Bumbalough | Feb 1995 | A |
5410297 | Joseph et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5446391 | Aoki et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5448996 | Benin et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5471198 | Newham | Nov 1995 | A |
5479939 | Ogino | Jan 1996 | A |
5519380 | Edwards | May 1996 | A |
RE35301 | Reichow | Jul 1996 | E |
5554835 | Newham | Sep 1996 | A |
5600104 | McCauley et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5600305 | Stafford et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5606516 | Douglas et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5623760 | Newham | Apr 1997 | A |
5633627 | Newham | May 1997 | A |
5640145 | Newham | Jun 1997 | A |
5654694 | Newham | Aug 1997 | A |
5672849 | Foster et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5700982 | Neuman | Dec 1997 | A |
5723826 | Kitagawa et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5747745 | Neuman | May 1998 | A |
5760688 | Kasai | Jun 1998 | A |
5767774 | Wright et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5780781 | Berger et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5796059 | Boon | Aug 1998 | A |
5798487 | Goichman et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5801339 | Boult | Sep 1998 | A |
5808552 | Wiley et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5823278 | Geringer | Oct 1998 | A |
5827981 | March | Oct 1998 | A |
5831221 | Geringer et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5844488 | Musick | Dec 1998 | A |
5859390 | Stafford et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5861581 | Evans et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5861582 | Flanagan et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5864295 | Jarocha | Jan 1999 | A |
5869788 | Gordon et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5879309 | Johnson et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5880410 | Neuman | Mar 1999 | A |
5896090 | Okada et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5906016 | Ferrand et al. | May 1999 | A |
5910647 | Kats et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5941836 | Friedman | Aug 1999 | A |
5957838 | Rantala | Sep 1999 | A |
5990423 | Ashpes et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991676 | Podoloff et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6020812 | Thompson et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6033370 | Reinbold et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6036660 | Toms | Mar 2000 | A |
6040532 | Munch | Mar 2000 | A |
6049281 | Osterweil | Apr 2000 | A |
D424650 | Reichow | May 2000 | S |
6056079 | Cech et al. | May 2000 | A |
6067019 | Scott | May 2000 | A |
6075464 | Cloutier et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6078253 | Fowler | Jun 2000 | A |
6078261 | Daysko | Jun 2000 | A |
6080106 | Lloyd et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6092838 | Walker | Jul 2000 | A |
6133743 | Gleixner et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6133837 | Riley | Oct 2000 | A |
6166644 | Stroda | Dec 2000 | A |
D436322 | Wajer | Jan 2001 | S |
6180893 | Salgo | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6204767 | Sparks | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208250 | Dixon et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6239706 | Yoshiike et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6250671 | Osmer et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6297738 | Newham | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307476 | Smith et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6320510 | Menkedick et al. | Nov 2001 | B2 |
6348663 | Schoos et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6362439 | Reichow | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6367314 | Melton, Jr. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6438776 | Ferrand et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6518520 | Jones et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6546813 | Hubbard, Jr. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6636820 | Livingston | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6668408 | Ferrand et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6680443 | Dixon | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6719708 | Jansen | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6784797 | Smith et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6791460 | Dixon et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6822571 | Conway | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6829796 | Salvatini et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6843109 | Nakada et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6847301 | Olson | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6924441 | Mobley et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6941598 | Ferrand et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6840117 | Hubbard, Jr. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6969809 | Rainey | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7009509 | Sakai | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7100439 | Carlucci | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7126065 | Petrucelli | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7176391 | Metz et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7202424 | Carlucci | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7253366 | Bhai | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7292150 | Shaw | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7310839 | Salvatini et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7335839 | Metz et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7437787 | Bhai | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7469436 | Meyer et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7500280 | Dixon et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7557718 | Petrosenko et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7568246 | Weismiller et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7578416 | Underwood | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7656299 | Gentry et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7666151 | Sullivan et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7698765 | Bobey et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7699784 | Wan Fong et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7714238 | Skinner et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7761310 | Rodgers | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7786874 | Rodgers | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7790022 | Underwood et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7834768 | Dixon et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7834770 | Kazuno | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7849545 | Flocard et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7897884 | Harish | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7911348 | Rodgers | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7937791 | Meyer et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7973666 | Petrosenko et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7978084 | Dixon et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7986242 | Dixon et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7987069 | Rodgers et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8048005 | Dixon et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
7924163 | Long et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8090478 | Skinner et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8146191 | Bobey et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8161826 | Taylor | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8196240 | Meyer et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8258963 | Dixon et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8272087 | Westermann | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8302227 | Jensen | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8344860 | Collins, Jr. et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8376964 | Park et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8381336 | Kazuno et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8400311 | Dixon et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8403864 | Boecker et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8419660 | Shaw | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8432287 | O'Keefe et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8464380 | Bobey et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8491492 | Shinar et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8517953 | Lange et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8525680 | Riley et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8525682 | Dixon et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8533879 | Taylor | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8537008 | Tallent et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8585607 | Klap et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8593284 | Tallent et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8598893 | Camus | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8603010 | Lange et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8783114 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
20010015292 | Salgo | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010020395 | Hubbard, Jr. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020070867 | Conway et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020080037 | Dixon et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030090383 | Conway | May 2003 | A1 |
20030136201 | Hubbard, Jr. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040046668 | Smith et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040111045 | Sullivan et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20060028350 | Bhai | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060070456 | Douglas et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060152358 | Osterweil | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060277683 | Lamire et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060279426 | Bonnet et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293613 | Fatehi et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070268147 | Bhai | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070272450 | Skinner et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080132808 | Lokhorst et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080169931 | Gentry et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080204254 | Kazuno | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090151081 | Wu et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090260158 | Kazuno et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100299840 | Brauers et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110234408 | Dixon et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120011941 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20130174345 | Leu et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20140039351 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140068860 | Shih | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140135659 | Maggi | May 2014 | A1 |
20140266733 | Hayes et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140326072 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150351982 | Krenik | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160106345 | Kostic | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160161623 | Chacon | Jun 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2003291808 | Jun 2004 | AU |
2003291808 | Jun 2004 | AU |
2505746 | Jun 2004 | CA |
2840837 | Jan 2013 | CA |
705223 | Jan 2013 | CH |
1731953 | Feb 2006 | CN |
100592892 | Mar 2010 | CN |
101677786 | Mar 2010 | CN |
202014102728 | Sep 2014 | DE |
1060461 | Dec 2000 | EP |
0844597 | Jul 2003 | EP |
1562474 | Aug 2005 | EP |
2148620 | Feb 2010 | EP |
2148620 | Aug 2013 | EP |
2680744 | Jan 2014 | EP |
2705790 | Mar 2014 | EP |
2725976 | May 2014 | EP |
2805703 | Nov 2014 | EP |
1078873 | Sep 2012 | ES |
2006512112 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2010526628 | Aug 2010 | JP |
5209044 | Mar 2013 | JP |
2014515628 | Jul 2014 | JP |
2014524792 | Sep 2014 | JP |
5688155 | Jan 2015 | JP |
2015008921 | Jan 2015 | JP |
155772 | Oct 2009 | SG |
201337825 | Sep 2013 | TW |
WO 02068921 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 2004021952 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004045407 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2005107674 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2008088842 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO 2008139377 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO 2012009014 | Jan 2012 | WO |
WO 2012122002 | Sep 2012 | WO |
WO 2012122002 | Sep 2012 | WO |
WO 2013003963 | Jan 2013 | WO |
WO 2013108503 | Jul 2013 | WO |
WO2013108503 | Jul 2013 | WO |
WO 2014151577 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO 2014165528 | Oct 2014 | WO |
WO 2014208246 | Dec 2014 | WO |
WO2013042631 | Mar 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
EP Search Report for Application No. 14306400, dated Jul. 13, 2015 (9 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160078740 A1 | Mar 2016 | US |