Pattern controlled bonding, Shape-controlled bonding, Fixation of optics, Stress-free bonding, Constrained bonding.
This invention relates in general to fixation by means of any type of adhesive of two- or more parts in an assembly consisting of one or more inhomogeneous part internally joined rigid together, e.g. lenses buildup as doublets or higher—or as the detailed example; Polarizing beam splitters. For fixation of these types of parts, it is beneficial, or even needed to constrain the fixation to only one of the sub-parts/elements, in order to prevent either optical degradation or in worst case physical damages due to thermal stress loading during operation. The invention is not limited to optical parts/assemblies; however the optical implementation is used as example—and this is the implemented use in a handheld intraoral 3D scanner called TRIOS manufactured by 3Shape A/S.
This problem is traditionally solved by preventing the bonding material in the area of “no-bond”-wanted; by cutting away unwanted bonding areas or sealing off the zone by a gasket to either keep the glue in or out. These methods are collective more difficult to perform and requires geometric changes to at least one part in the assembly and adds both cost to BOM (bill of materials) and cost due to the handling, whereas our proposed invention only add the cost of the low energy surface (the PTFE-tape in our case) and the extra handling time to add it, which in many cases will be neglectable.
Accordingly, in one aspect the invention relates to an assembly comprising at least one attachment part and a holder part to which the at least one attachment part is attached, wherein the attachment part is attached to the holder part with an adhesive in an interface area and a pattern control element is attached to one of the parts in the interface area, wherein the pattern control element comprises a non-stick surface.
The principal function of this invention is to limit the active adhesive area used for the fixation between two parts in a controlled way, but without controlling the adhesive area itself. This is obtained by adding a pattern control element to one of the parts in the interface, which have neglectable influence on the part it attach to, but effectively removing any bonding/adhesion between the two original parts in the area of this pattern control element. This method differentiates from other known methods in the way that it doesn't try to control the adhesive material, which in case of liquid glue or heat activated films (HAF) has proven very difficult; but instead prevents bonding by adding the pattern control element in the interface in the area(s) where bonding is prohibited. The area of this “no-bond” zone can be controlled by applying a pattern produced in a material that has a low surfaces energy relatively to the adhesive used. Various methods exist for applying this pattern, ranging from plasma applied coating or chemical coating to simple labels and tape stamped or cut to shape and manually applied to one of the parts.
The application of this is for example advantageous where the two parts have different coefficients of thermal expansion (CTE). By being able to control the adhesive in the interface area it is possible to prevent detachment or unintended deformation by controlling where the parts bond to each other.
Thus, by placing a non-adhesive pattern using the pattern control element it is possible to decide with very high precision where the parts are attached in a simple and effective manner.
The described setup is particular advantageous in embodiments where the attachment part is an inhomogeneous part comprising a first and a second element. Such first and second elements may for example be prisms, for example in cases where the inhomogeneous part is a beam splitter.
Such prisms are typically attached to each other in an attachment area by e.g. an adhesive. In cases where the holder part have a different CTE than the beam splitter stress will occur in the attachment area due to forces acting on the two prisms. This will alter the characteristics of the beam splitter and render the assembly useless and unreliable. Accordingly, an assembly as described herein has shown to be particularly suitable for beam splitters and other prism assemblies.
In some embodiment the pattern control element may be provided as a non-stick coating. The coating may be directly dispersed on the respective part during production.
In an alternative embodiment the pattern control element is a tape comprising a non-stick coating. Such tape may easily be cut and applied during production. Moreover a piece of tape may be cut with slightly larger dimensions than the part or element which it covers in order to ensure complete coverage.
The non-stick coating may advantageously be polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), such as Teflon. However, a silicone coating or other non-stick coating known in the art may be used. It should be understood that the non-stick characteristics of the pattern control element may change depending on the adhesive used. Thus, when applying the assembly as described herein the person skilled in the art would consider combinations of adhesive and pattern control elements that provide a non-stick coating that shows very low adhesive affinity to each other.
The pattern control element preferably covers at least one of the part elements in the interface area. It is thus completely prevented that the element covered adheres to the adhesive and unintentional forces are applied thereto.
The inhomogeneous part and the holder part preferably abut each other in the interface area.
As an example, below is shown the steps in adding a low energy surface in form of a PTFE-tape to an optical beam-splitter, consisting of two prisms, prior to gluing the beam-splitter to an aluminum holder by means of Epoxy glue.
a and 1b shows the use of pattern control element in the shape of a masking (in this case, PTFE-tape) which covers the “no-bond” zone, including the transition plus tolerances, and
a and 1b shows a beam splitter 1 formed of a first prism 2 and a second prism 3, which are cemented together in a refraction surface 4. As discussed then any opposite forces on the two prisms will result in tension in the refraction surface which will alter the characteristics and render the beam splitter useless.
Accordingly, in order to solve this problem a tape 5 having a non-stick surface 6 is applied to the sides of the beam splitter which are to be attached to a holder (7 in
The tape is applied so that it covers the surface of the second prism in the interface areas. Moreover a slight overlap 9 of the tape into the surface of the first prism is provided in order to ensure complete coverage.
When the tape has been applied the surplus material is cut away as seen in
During production no advanced techniques or accurate adhesive disposal system needs to be used since the non-stick surface of the tape 5 will prevent adhesive to stick to the surface of the second prism. Thus, only the first prism is effectively attached to the holder and if the holder expands differently than the beam splitter due to different CTE values, no tension will build up between the two prisms and the characteristics of the beam splitter will remain constant and reliable.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PA 2011 00549 | Jul 2011 | DK | national |
PA 2011 00551 | Jul 2011 | DK | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2012/063690 | 7/12/2012 | WO | 00 | 4/7/2014 |