The present disclosure is related to LED light bulb and in particular input power control to enable that dim the illumination.
The growing popularity and proliferation of light bulbs formed with LED devices has directed attention to powering concepts. Incandescent light bulbs are primarily driven by voltage, whereas LED devices are primarily driven by current. This means that circuitry more complex than wires connecting a filament to a source of power is required, and if light dimming is required the circuitry becomes even more complex. Also this circuitry complexity needs to be packaged in a small space to allow an LED bulb to replace an incandescent bulb in a fashion similar to which has been used by the incandescent bulb, for instance screwing an LED bulb into an incandescent “light” socket.
The technologies used to create an LED power dimming capability appear to be wide ranging from power factor control to a switch mode control using a tapped buck configuration. The objective is not only to be able to reduce the illumination from an LED bulb, but to reduce the illumination smoothly and flicker free. In some cases an audible noise, for instance a buzz or whistling, occurs caused by physical components or PCB stress at high current flow, and an increase in dimming resolution is needed. These problems detract from the utility of a LED light bulb and the ability to dim the illumination resulting from the light bulb.
In U.S. 2013/0175929 A1 (Hoogzaad) a method is directed to regulating an LED current flowing through a circuit containing an LED device. U.S. 2013/0113386 A1 (Hariharan) is directed to an LED illumination system comprising devices and methods of driving an LED. U.S. 2013/0099684 A1 (Cheng et al.) is directed to parallel channels of LED devices using a pulse control signal. U.S. 2012/0062138 A1 (Wilson et al.) is directed to an illumination apparatus comprising a plurality of LED devices and a control system connected to receive dimmer-modulated AC line voltage. U.S. 2002/0167471 (Everitt) is directed to a pulse width modulation driver for an organic LED display. U.S. Pat. No. 8,441,202 B2 (Wilson et al.) is directed to a plurality of LED devices and a control system connect to receive dimmer-modulated AC line voltage to control the LED devices. In U.S. Pat. No. 8,362,706 B1 (Godbole) an apparatus and method is directed to control current through one or more LED circuits, wherein a compensation unit functions to offset errors. U.S. Pat. No. 8,358,084 B2 (Shin et al.) is directed to an LED current control circuit comprising a current detecting unit, a current adjusting unit and a current control unit. U.S. Pat. No. 7,999,491 B2 (Peng et al.) is directed at providing a high precision lighting control means to drive an LED lighting module.
It is an objective of the present disclosure to use pulse density modulation (PDM) to distribute the on-time of the LED devices over the entire cycle.
It is further an objective of the present disclosure to control the dimming of LED devices with control circuitry on the primary side of the LED power circuitry.
It is also an objective of the present disclosure use either pulse width modulation (PWM) or pulse density modulation (PDM) to control dimming of LED devices.
A bridge rectifier circuit is used to transform an AC voltage into a full wave rectified DC voltage to bias circuitry on a primary side of a transformer comprising a transistor controlled by a DC-DC controller. The DC-DC controller modulates the current on the primary side of the transformer with pulse density modulation (PDM) to produce a current on the secondary side of the transformer that is used to dim a string of at least one LED devices. On the secondary side of the transformer are located the string of at least one LED devices. The DC-DC controller uses a combination of drive current reduction and pulse density modulation (PDM) to transfer primary side energy through the transformer to the string of LED diodes. The PDM distributes the time that the LED devices are turned on over the whole period to eliminate strong fundamental repetition frequency and to ease loading on the previous driver stage.
A combination of drive current and PDM modulation is used to achieve a level of dimming of light emitted from the string of LED diodes. At a predetermined current level of the LED diodes, the drive current is maintained at a constant level, for instance 60%, at a fixed Ton/Tp, where Ton is the time the LED devices are on and Tp is the period of one cycle. At this point the duty cycle of the PDM modulation is reduced from 100% to further lower the LED current to approximately 1% and further dim the LED devices.
This disclosure will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
LED devices with primary-side regulation use a combination of drive current and PDM modulation to achieve a dimmable light level. The graph of
In
In
The ‘on’ time TON is synchronized with the DC-DC converter 11 switching due to the primary-side regulation control either at the switching frequency or a sub-multiple. This ensures that the generated waveform aligns with the switching frequency, which can help eliminate any sub-sampling harmonics from being generated.
The resulting repetition frequency of the PDM, i.e. 1/TPERIOD, which is the product of the TON time and the modulator length (for example the accumulator count), can result in a lower repetition frequency than the PWM technique, as it has a lower spectral content at any visible flicker frequencies.
The pulsed current stressing of the components and/or PCB tracking, which can create noise at the lower audible frequencies, is significantly reduced, and higher resolution of the current duty cycle can be achieved by incorporating ‘binary fractional’ mathematics within the modulator. For example using a 10-to-8 bit dither over 4 consecutive DC-DC converter 11 switching cycles allows a 10-bit resolution of the current setting with an eight-bit resolution current limit DAC. By incorporating the additional ¼ LSB-weighting within the PDM modulation, accomplishes the same result with only an 8-bit current limit DAC without using four consecutive conversion cycles.
A higher order of modulator structures can be used to shape the resulting spectrum and lower the visible-flicker frequencies with the trade-off to lower repetition (1/TPERIOD) frequencies. However, there may be both significant repeating patterns at specific duty cycle ratios, as well as limitations to the generated pulse density that are well understood for various structures of modulators. The dimming curve graph can be modified to accommodate the limitation of the modulation depth by limiting the range of PDM duty cycle used, for example if the modulator is operated with a maximum of 80% duty cycle, the drive current can be increased as shown in
The hysteresis 70 in the transition between linear current using a fixed duty cycle and variable duty cycle provides a benefit when the dimming level is set to the transition point. As the dimming level is changed from a fixed duty cycle to a variable duty cycle and visa versa, there is a degree of matching that must take place so as not to produce a noticeable jump in brightness, which may produce a “jitter” in the brightness at the transition between the fixed duty cycle and the variable duty cycle. To overcome this lack of a smooth transition, the hysteresis in the transition was created to prevent the “jitter” and produce a smooth transition.
Shown in
The mathematical structure of a more general 1st order modulator is expressed as follows, where the variables are defined as
While the disclosure has been particularly shown and described with reference to preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
14392001 | Feb 2014 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5995546 | Richardson | Nov 1999 | A |
6115731 | Hendricks | Sep 2000 | A |
6573666 | Killat | Jun 2003 | B1 |
7915838 | VanEss | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7999491 | Peng et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8358084 | Shiu et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8362706 | Godbole | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8441202 | Wilson et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8536801 | Dernovsek | Sep 2013 | B1 |
20020167471 | Everitt | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20080018261 | Kastner | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20100090618 | Veltman | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100123403 | Reed | May 2010 | A1 |
20100231132 | Logiudice | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110062877 | Yang | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110095697 | Ludorf | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110101877 | Zhan et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20120062138 | Wilson et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20130099684 | Cheng et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130113386 | Hariharan | May 2013 | A1 |
20130119875 | Dearborn | May 2013 | A1 |
20130162224 | Eckel | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130175929 | Hoogzaad | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130221875 | Liao | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130249440 | Doshi | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140285092 | Knoedgen | Sep 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2011056242 | May 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report 14392001.5-1802 Mailed: Jul. 4, 2014, Dialog Semiconductor GmbH. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150245438 A1 | Aug 2015 | US |