The system and method disclosed herein relate to the field of telecommunications and, more specifically, to a system and method that reduces the peak to average power ratio (PAR) of a communication system.
A communication system facilitates the exchange of data between or among various electronic devices, such as a mobile station (MS), a base station (BS), an access point, a cellular phone, a personal digital assistant, a radio, a personal computer, a notebook, a workstation, a global positioning device, a server, and other devices that may be used to transmit and/or receive data. Communication systems are widely deployed to provide various communication services such as voice, video, packet data, messaging, broadcast, etc. These systems may employ various multiplexing schemes such as orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM), various space-time codes, and spatial multiplexing as in the case of a multiple-input and multiple-output (MIMO) system.
Space-time codes implemented on multiple transmit antennas, as well as the inverse Fourier transform used in OFDM systems, generally result in a high peak to average power ratio (PAR). PAR is a metric that is pertinent to all multiplexing schemes. It is the ratio of the peak power of a signal to the average power of the signal. A high PAR is undesirable because it may require a power amplifier (PA) to operate at an average output power that may be much lower than the peak output power. This reduced power operation is due to the fact that large peaks in the signal may cause the PA to operate in a highly non-linear region, or possibly clip the large peaks, which may then cause intermodulation distortion and other artifacts that may degrade signal quality. By operating the PA at a power lower than its peak power, where the level of operating power may be dependent on the PAR, the PA may be able to handle large peaks in the signal without generating excessive distortion. However, such operation at reduced power results in inefficient operation of the PA at times when large peaks are not present in the signal. Thus, it is desirable to reduce the PAR of the signal so that the PA may operate closer to the peak output power, when necessary.
Over a slow fading point-to-point channel, there is a tradeoff between error probability and data rate in terms of diversity-multiplexing gain (D-MG) tradeoff. However, when multiple antennas are used, space-time codes achieving the D-MG tradeoff generally result in a higher PAR on each antenna.
Constellation shaping is a coding technique that selects constellation points from an expanded constellation by choosing a new boundary on a lattice. It can provide moderate shaping gain on top of the coding gain with modest complexity. The basic idea of constellation shaping is to create a constellation containing more than the minimum number of points needed, and choosing a new boundary that matches an equimetric surface defined by an energy norm of the constellation using only the points inside the optimized boundary. Proper constellation shaping can lead to a reduction of PAR.
A method for reducing the PAR using constellation shaping has been proposed by H. Kwok in “Shape up: peak-power reduction via constellation shaping,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2001. Kwok describes a method of PAR reduction using the Smith Normal Form matrix decomposition. Kwok's method is relatively complex and requires high computational resources. Moreover, it appears to only be applicable to OFDM systems.
Therefore, a need exists for PAR reduction methods that apply to different communication systems, including OFDM, space-time coded, and MIMO systems, as well as systems that include a combination of these techniques.
In accordance with a first aspect of the present disclosure, a method for transmitting data in a communication system employing an encoding scheme is provided. The method comprises processing data in accordance with a particular processing scheme to provide a plurality of information symbols; shaping a constellation of the plurality of information symbols to obtain a plurality of shaped symbols; processing the plurality of shaped symbols in accordance with the encoding scheme to obtain a plurality of transformed signals such that the peak to average power ratio (PAR) of the plurality of transformed symbols is lower than the PAR would be if the information symbols were not shaped into shaped symbols prior to processing into transformed symbols, wherein the encoding scheme may be expressed in a form x=Gs, sεZN, GεRN×N, where x is an isomorphic vector representation of transformed signals, G is an N×N invertible generator matrix and N is an integer ≧0, s is a vector of a plurality of information symbols chosen from an N-dimensional integer lattice ZN, and R represents the real domain; and transmitting the plurality of transformed signals over a communication network.
In accordance with a second aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided a method for receiving data in a communication system employing an encoding scheme, the method comprising receiving a plurality of transmitted signals, wherein a constellation of the received signals were shaped prior to transmission, processing the plurality of received signals in an estimator to obtain decoded symbols; and de-shaping the decoded symbols to obtain information symbols, wherein the constellation of transmitted signals are processed prior to transmission, such that the peak to average power ratio (PAR) of the transmitted signals is lower than the PAR would be if the transmitted signals were not shaped prior to transmission, and in accordance with an encoding scheme that may be expressed in the form x=Gs, sεZN, GεRN×N.
In accordance with a third aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided a device for transmitting data in a communication system employing an encoding scheme, the device comprising a processor for processing data in accordance with a particular processing scheme to provide a plurality of information symbols; a shaping unit for shaping a constellation of the plurality of information symbols to obtain a plurality of shaped symbols; an encoder for encoding the plurality of shaped symbols in accordance with an encoding scheme to obtain a plurality of transformed signals such that the peak to average power ratio (PAR) of the plurality of transformed symbols is lower than the PAR would be if the information symbols were not shaped into shaped symbols prior to processing into transformed symbols, wherein the encoding scheme may be expressed in a form x=Gs, sεZN, GεRN×N; and a transmitter for transmitting the plurality of transformed signals over a communication network.
In accordance with a fourth aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided a device for receiving data in a communication system employing an encoding scheme, the device comprising a receiver to receive a plurality of transmitted signals as received signals, wherein the constellation of the transmitted signals were shaped prior to transmission; a processor to process the plurality of received signals in an estimator to obtain decoded symbols; and a de-shaping unit to de-shape the decoded symbols to obtain information symbols, wherein the constellation of transmitted signals are processed prior to transmission, such that the peak to average power ratio (PAR) of the transmitted signals is lower than the PAR would be if the transmitted signals were not shaped, and in accordance with an encoding scheme that may be expressed in the form x=Gs, sεZN, GεRN×N.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only, and are not restrictive of the invention, as claimed.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate various embodiments. In the drawings:
In the following description, for purposes of explanation and not limitation, specific techniques and embodiments are set forth, such as particular sequences of steps, interfaces, and configurations, in order to provide a thorough understanding of the techniques presented herein. While the techniques and embodiments will primarily be described in context with the accompanying drawings, those skilled in the art will further appreciate that the techniques and embodiments can also be practiced in other communication systems.
Reference will now be made in detail to exemplary embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts.
Methods, apparatus, and systems disclosed herein are configured to reduce PAR without affecting code structures and without transmitting additional information in order for modified space-time codes to still obtain a desirable D-MG tradeoff.
User stations 120 may be dispersed throughout system 100, and each user station 120 may be stationary or mobile. Each user station 120 may also be referred to as a mobile station, a mobile equipment, a terminal, an access terminal, a subscriber unit, a station, etc. Each user station 120 may be a cellular phone, a personal digital assistant (PDA), a wireless communication device, a handheld device, a wireless modem, a laptop computer, etc. User station 120 may communicate with zero, one, or multiple nodes 110 on a downlink and/or uplink at any given moment. Downlink (or forward link) refers to a communication link from one of nodes 110 to one of user stations 120. Uplink (or reverse link) refers to a communication link from one of user stations 120 to one of nodes 110. Further, system 100 may utilize OFDM, MIMO, space-coding, a combination of these schemes, and/or other multiplexing schemes.
As shown in
User station 202 may include a transmit (TX) processor 210, encoding unit(s) 212, transmitter(s) 214, memory device(s) 216, and TX antenna(s) 218. Node 204 may include a receive (RX) processor 220, decoding unit(s) 222, receiver(s) 224, memory device 226, and RX antenna(s) 228.
With reference to user station 202, TX processor 210 receives traffic data and signaling for transmission to node 204, processes (e.g., interleaves, symbol maps, modulates, etc.) the traffic data, signaling, and/or pilot symbols, and provides modulated symbols. Encoding unit 212 encodes the modulated symbols and generates transformed signals for transmission, and may include its own processor. Transmitter 214 further processes (e.g., converts to analog, amplifies, filters, and frequency upconverts) the transformed signals and generates an uplink signal, which is transmitted via TX antenna 218. Memory device 216 stores data that may be retrieved and used as user station 202 performs various processing tasks, including those performed in encoding unit 212. Memory device 216 may also store predetermined values such as addresses, transmission/reception capacity of channels 208, and information regarding characteristics of communication network 206 and node 204.
With reference to node 204, RX antenna 228 receives the uplink signal from user station 202 and provides a received signal to receiver 224. Receiver 224 processes (e.g., filters, amplifies, frequency downconverts, and digitizes) the received signal and provides received samples. Decoding unit 222 performs symbol estimation and decoding of the received samples. RX processor 220 further processes (e.g., symbol demaps, deinterleaves) the symbol estimates and provides information symbols. Memory device 226 stores information retrieved from the received data and/or data that may be retrieved and used as node 204 performs various processing tasks. Additionally, memory device 226 may store predetermined values that facilitate communication between user station 202 and node 204. In general, the processes performed by RX processor 220 and decoding unit 222 at node 204 are complementary to the processes performed by TX processor 210 and encoding unit 212, respectively, at user station 202.
TX and RX processors 210 and 220 may be medium access controllers (MACs) and/or physical layer processing circuits, and memories 216 and 226 may include any or all forms of non-volatile or volatile memory, including, by way of example, semiconductor memory devices, such as EPROM, RAM, ROM, DRAM, EEPROM, and flash memory devices; magnetic disks such as internal hard disks and removable disks; magneto-optical disks; and CD-ROM disks. Memory devices 216 and 226 may include computer-readable storage medium including application programs, code, and/or instructions that may be executed on processors 210 and 220, respectively, during performance of various processing tasks performed by user station 202 and node 204.
Embodiments consistent with the present invention may be practiced for communication systems employing any of various encoding schemes, including those that achieve the D-MG tradeoff as described earlier. Such encoding schemes may be expressed in the following general form (1):
x=Gs sεZN GεRN×N (1)
where x is an isomorphic vector representation of either space-time code, inverse Fourier transformed symbols in OFDM systems, or other similarly transformed signals; G is an N×N invertible generator matrix (where N is an integer); s is a vector of information symbols chosen from an N-dimensional integer lattice ZN, where Z denotes the set of integers; and R represents the real domain. As an example, a QAM constellation is simply a translation of the integer lattice ZN.
Many encoding schemes may be expressed in the general form of (1). For example, an n×n space-time code X could be expressed in terms of n vectors x(i) of length n, for i=1, 2, . . . , n,
x(i)=G(i)s(i)
s(i)εZ[i]n, G(i)εCn×n
where Z[i] represents Gaussian integers (i.e. a+bi, a, bεZ), C represents the complex domain, s(i) is a vector containing n information symbols, and G(i) is the corresponding generator matrix. The isomorphic representation for each s(i) and G(i) may be obtained by separating their real and imaginary parts, as follows,
where vT denotes the transpose of vector v.
As a result, x′(i)=G′(i)s′(i), where x′(i), s′(i), and G′(i) respectively represent the isomorphic representation of x(i), s(i) and G(i). This expression corresponds to general form (1).
A constellation generally consists of a set of points on an m-dimensional complex lattice or an M-dimensional real lattice (where M=2m) that are enclosed within a finite region. At any given transmitted data rate, the boundary of the signal constellation will determine its average power and PAR. The PAR of a stream of symbols to be transmitted on a certain antenna is defined as the maximum of the ratio of the instantaneously transmitted power to the average transmitted power. This definition of PAR can be represented as follows:
PAR≡max PAR(xi)
where PAR(xi)≡(∥xi∥)2/(E[∥xi∥2]),
xi is an element of x, the transmitted signal, and “∥ ∥” represents the L2-norm.
The average power and PAR vary depending on the shape of the selected signal constellation. As the size of the constellation approaches infinity, an M-dimensional constellation consisting of points enclosed within an M-dimensional cube, or cubic shaping, leads to a PAR value of 3. Embodiments consistent with the present invention are disclosed implementing the asymptotic PAR value of 3 obtained in cubic shaping. However, one of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that various shaping methods may change PAR in different ways, some of which may be preferable to others depending on the specific coding methods and desired PAR values
Approximately Cubic Shaping Via Hermite Normal Form (HNF) Decomposition
As shown in
Initially, shaping unit 310 determines whether or not the encoding scheme may be expressed in general form (1) above (520). If it cannot be so expressed, then shaping is not performed (530). If the encoding scheme can be expressed in general form (1), then shaping unit 310 determines a relational matrix Q (540). Q is a relational matrix that defines a relationship between s and s′, where s′εs+QZN, and s+QZN is the set of equivalent points, i.e. coset, such that x=Gs′, in which x has a desired approximate cubic constellation shown in the following expression (2):
x=Gs′, s′εs+QZN (2)
Therefore, xεG(S+QZN)
xεGs+GQZN
and GQ≈σI,
where σ is selected such that σN is the total number of possible transmitted constellation points, and I is an identity matrix.
In
Q is determined through the following relationship:
Q=[σ′G−1], |det(Q)|≧σN
where [ ] denotes the rounding function, σ′ is a constant that ensures |det(Q)|≧σN, σN is the number of possible transmitted points, and |det(Q)| is the volume of the parallelotope defined by Q or, equivalently, the number of points in the parallelotope. Because the number of cosets, i.e., |det(Q)|, must be large enough to support the desired number of points transmitted, the value of σ′ chosen is the smallest value that ensures |det(Q)|≧σN. In the case of approximately cubic shaping, Q may be chosen as a nonsingular matrix.
Once shaping unit 310 determines Q (540), it indexes every coset s+QZN for encoding. In doing so, shaping unit 310 determines coset leaders of S+QZN in order to represent the cosets. The coset leaders of s+QZN satisfy the following expression (3):
if si≠sj
then si≠sj+Qz, for all ∀zεZN (3)
where si, Ssj are the coset-leaders of two different cosets si+QZN, si+QZN, respectively, in order to ensure that no ambiguity results in demodulation
As an example, in a case when Q=D=diag(d1, d2, . . . , dN), the set of coset leaders, denoted as S, may be chosen as
S≡{s=[s1,s2, . . . , sN]T|0≦si<di,i=1, 2, . . . , N}.
Here, the coset-leaders sεS satisfy expression (3), and S contains all of the coset leaders.
As discussed above, the number of coset leaders is equal to |det(D)|. For example,
then S={[0,0]T, [0,1]T},
and the number of coset-leaders in S is det(D) is 2.
In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, for a general case when Q is not a diagonal matrix, Q may be decomposed as
Q=RV, (4)
where V is a unimodular matrix, and R is an integer lower triangular matrix. The HNF theorem, published by C. Hermite in “Sur I'introduction des variables continues dans la theorie des nombres” (J. Reine Angew. Math., pp 191-216, 1851) and summarized below in Theorem 1 and Theorem 2, establishes the existence of the decomposition of Q=RV.
Theorem 1: Any N×N invertible integer matrix Q can be decomposed into Q=RV, where V is a unimodular matrix and R is an integer lower triangular matrix.
Let rii≠0 be the diagonal elements of R. The set of coset leaders, S, may be formed as
S={s|0≦rii}. (5)
where s=[s1, s2, . . . , sN]T.
The validity of this set of coset-leaders can be verified by Theorem 2 below.
Theorem 2: Given a matrix Q=RV, the set S defined in (5) contains all the coset leaders of s+QZN.
Therefore, by performing HNF decomposition of Q into lower triangular matrix R and unimodular matrix V, shaping unit 310 is able to obtain the coset leaders from s+QZN by first obtaining the coset leaders from R (550).
Next, to ensure that each coset leader in S is contained within a parallelotope enclosed by the columns of Q, shaping unit 310 performs a modulo-Q operation expressed below in (6) in order to place s′ in the shaped constellation prior to transmitting x=Gs′ (560):
γ=└Q−1s┘ (6)
s′=s−Qγ
where └ ┘ denotes the floor function.
Optionally, shaping unit 310 may translate s′ in order to minimize the average transmit power of x (570). Finally, once s′ is determined, generator 320 obtains transformed signals x based on the expression (2) above.
where si is the i-th element of s; qi is the modulo quotient; and rii is the i-th diagonal element of R. Because the generator matrix G is fixed for a given application, ri is pre-calculated and stored as a part of the application system set-up and therefore known to both the transmitter and the receiver.
Alternatively, values of s may be pre-calculated and stored, along with relevant algorithms used to obtain s, in a look-up table (not shown) in memory 226. If a look-up table is used, then de-shaping unit 620 obtains s by referring to the look-up table (730).
Approximately Cubic Shaping Via Integer Reversible Matrix Mapping
Initially, shaping unit 310 determines whether or not the encoding scheme may be expressed as general form (1) above (820). If it cannot, then shaping is not performed (830).
On the other hand, if the encoding scheme can be expressed in the general form (1), shaping unit 310 calculates the relational matrix Q to be G−1 (840) and normalizes |det(Q)| to be 1 (850). That is,
Q=G−1, and
|det(Q)|=1.
By normalizing |det(Q)| to 1, encoding unit 212 ensures that relational matrix Q may be processed through IRMM.
IRMM is explained in “Matrix factorizations for reversible integer mapping” by Hao et al (IEEE trans. Signal Processing, vol. 49, pp. 2314-2324, October 2001) (hereinafter “Hao”), the contents of which are hereby incorporated in their entirety.
As Hao shows, if there exists an elementary reversible structure based on a matrix for perfectly invertible integer implementation, then the matrix is called an elementary reversible matrix (ERM). For an upper triangular elementary reversible matrix (TERM) A with elements {amn} containing diagonal elements jm=±1, its reversible integer mapping from input s to output y is defined as y=[As], where
and its inverse mapping is
Similar results may be obtained for a lower TERM.
A single-row ERM (SERM) is another feasible ERM in which jm=±1 on the diagonal, and all but one row of off-diagonal elements are all zeros. The reversible integer mapping of SERM is as follows:
where m′ represents the row with nonzero off-diagonal elements. Its inverse operation is
If all the diagonal elements of a TERM are equal to 1, the TERM is called a unit TERM. Similarly, a SERM whose diagonal elements are equal to 1 is called a unit SERM. Hao further shows that a matrix has a “PLUSo” factorization if and only if its determinate is ±1. In PLUSo, P is a permutation matrix that may carry a negative sign, L and U are unit lower and unit upper TERMs, respectively, and So is a unit SERM with m′=N.
Accordingly, shaping unit 310 obtains an integer to integer reversible mapping (860) by decomposing the relational matrix Q previously obtained (850) into
Q=PLUSo, (9)
where P is a permutation matrix that may carry a negative sign, L and U are unit lower and unit upper TERMs, respectively, and So is a unit SERM.
Finally, shaping unit 310 obtains symbols s′ through the following algorithm
s′=[Qs]
or equivalently,
s′=P[L[U[S0s]]], sεS
S′={s′|0≧si≧σ}.
where [ ] denotes the rounding function, S is the constellation of information symbols s chosen from an N-dimensional integer lattice ZN, S′ is the shaped constellation, and σ is an integer chosen such that σN equals the total number of possible transmitted constellation points (870).
s=[S0−1[U1[L−1P−1(s′)]]],
where [U1v] denotes the inverse operation of the upper triangular TERM U on vector v given by expression (7), [L−1v] denotes the inverse operation of the lower triangular TERM L on vector v, and [S0−1v] is the inverse operation of the SERM S0 on vector v given by expression (8).
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, when complex representation is used for shaping, general form (1) becomes
x=Gs, sε(Z[i])N, GεCN×N, (10)
where the rounding function now operates on real and imaginary components individually, and the corresponding jm=±1 in SERM and TERM becomes either ±1 or ±i, where i is an imaginary unit. In expression (10) above, the inverse operations (7) and (8) still apply.
In this case, Q may be decomposed into
Q=PLDRUS0, (11)
if and only if det(Q)=det(DR)≠0, where DR=diag(1, 1, . . . , 1, eiθ), L and U are lower and upper TERMs, respectively, and P is a permutation matrix. If det(Q)=±1 or ±i, then the simplified factorization of Q=PLUS0 is obtained. That is, expression (11) is a generalization of expression (9).
In a case where det(Q)=eiθ and is not equal to ±1 or ±i, a complex rotation eiθ may be implemented using the real and imaginary components of a complex number factorized into three unit TERMs, as follows:
This equation may also be used when Q is the Fourier transform matrix, such as in an OFDM signal, in which all coefficients assume the form eiθ.
In one embodiment, values and algorithms used to obtain s′ in process 800 may be pre-calculated and stored in a look-up table (not shown) in memory 216, and values and algorithms used to obtain s in process 900 may be pre-calculated and stored in a look-up table (not shown) in memory 226. If look-up tables are used, then shaping unit 310 obtains s′ in process 800 by referring to the look-up table in memory 216, and de-shaping unit 620 obtains s in process 900 by referring to the look-up table in memory 226.
Initially, shaping unit 310 determines whether or not the encoding scheme may be expressed in general form (1) above (1020). If it cannot, then shaping is not performed (1030).
If the encoding scheme may be expressed in general form (1), then shaping unit 310 determines whether HNF decomposition or IRMM is desired (1040). If HNF decomposition is desired, then shaping unit 310 performs the operations described in 540 through 570 in process 500, using HNF decomposition, in order to obtain s′ (1050). On the other hand, if IRMM is desired, then shaping unit 310 performs the operations corresponding to 840 through 870 in process 800, using IRMM, in order to obtain s′ (1060).
If de-shaping unit 620 determines that the symbols were processed with HNF decomposition, then it performs the operation corresponding to 730 of process 700 in order to obtain s from s′ (1140). On the other hand, if de-shaping unit 620 determines that IRMM was used, then it performs the operation corresponding to 930 of process 900 in order to obtain s from s′ (1150).
CCDF{PAR(xi),ρ}=P{PAR(xi)>ρ}. (12)
where ρ is the value on the abscissa. Expression (12) may be interpreted to be the probability that, for symbols transmitted by antenna i, the PAR(xi) exceeds the value ρ at any given moment.
In
In
Finally,
Compared to existing PAR reduction methods, the methods disclosed herein significantly reduce computing complexity. Additionally, methods provided herein work for any nonsingular generator/modulation matrix while achieving better PAR reduction. Moreover, the application of the present invention is not limited to OFDM and space-time coded systems; embodiments consistent with the present invention may be practiced in any system with encoding schemes that may be expressed in the general form (1).
The foregoing description has been presented for purposes of illustration. It is not exhaustive and does not limit the invention to the precise forms or embodiments disclosed. Modifications and adaptations of the invention will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the disclosed embodiments of the invention.
Other embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the invention disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with a true scope and spirit of the invention being indicated by the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of priority from U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/050,604, filed on May 5, 2008, the disclosure of which is expressly incorporated herein by reference to its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6452978 | Reuven et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
20020061068 | Leva et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20030099302 | Tong et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20070140101 | Guo et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2007092945 | Aug 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Amin Mobasher, “Applications of Lattice Codes in Communication Systems”, PHD Thesis, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Waterloo, Dec. 2007. |
Benoit Meister, “On a matrix decomposition”, University of Louis Pasteur, France, Apr. 2002. |
Chung-Pi Lee and Hsuan-Jung Su, “Peak to average power ratio reduction of space-time codes that achieve diversity-multiplexing gain tradeoff”, Department of Electrical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Sep. 15-18, 2008, IEEE. |
Amin Mobasher and Amir K. Khandani, “PAPR Reduction Using Integer Structures in OFDM Systems”, University of Waterloo, 2004, IEEE. |
Chung-Pi Lee and Hsuan-Jung Su, “Diversity-Multiplexing Gain Tradeoff with Peak to Average Power Ratio Constraints”, National Taiwan University, 2008, IEEE. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090274243 A1 | Nov 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61050604 | May 2008 | US |