The present invention relates to a pedometer.
Pedometers of this kind, hereinafter also called “step counters,” are commonly known. The document DE 10 2007 043 490, for example, discloses a pedometer in which a number of steps, and by way of a predefined step length a route traveled, can be deduced by evaluating the signals of an acceleration sensor. Because the distance thereby ascertained corresponds only to a “bee-line,” projected onto the plane, between the starting point and destination, provision is further made to use a pressure sensor to take into account the elevation profile over the route segment. A disadvantage of the conventional pedometer is that provision is made only for general consideration of how the elevation that has been negotiated influences the length of the route traveled. The existing art does not disclose variable adaptation to a change in elevation of the step length taken into account in route measurement, and this form of route calculation is therefore relatively inaccurate.
The pedometer according to example embodiments of the present invention, and the method according to example embodiments of the present invention for counting steps, have the advantage, as compared with the existing art, that an adaptation of the predefined step length to the measured average elevation change is performed for each step, i.e. in variable fashion, if the measured average elevation change per step, in particular with reference to a specific sub-route, changes significantly. This enables a more accurate determination of routes traveled on foot on the basis of pedometers.
In general, a person varies the length of his or her steps when walking. The step length depends in particular on the elevation being negotiated with each step while walking. For example, a person usually automatically shortens the length of his or her steps when walking outdoors uphill or downhill. The step length becomes considerably shorter especially when climbing or descending stairs. This results in an erroneous calculation of routes traveled on foot if the calculation is based on the number of steps and assumes an unadapted step length. It is advantageous that a relatively flexible adaptation of the step length is possible as a function of the profile of the route traveled. For example, even in the case of a sequence of positive and negative elevation changes that add up to a total elevation change of zero, an adaptation of step lengths to the respective positive or negative slope can be performed.
Especially when ascertaining the length of routes traveled in buildings, in which stairs need to be repeatedly climbed and described, a higher accuracy as compared with conventional systems can thereby be achieved. If the calculated routes traveled are to be used, for example, for dead reckoning, it is advantageous, in particular inside buildings, tunnels, and subway stations, to be able to make an accurate determination of routes traveled on the basis of step length, since a position correction based on GPS signals, which is usually performed in the context of dead reckoning, is not possible in locations with poor or insufficient GPS reception. Dead reckoning of this kind may be necessary, for example, for location-based services.
According to example embodiments, provision is made that for a measured average elevation change per step of zero, the variable step length has a value corresponding to the predefined step length, which value is referred to hereinafter as a “maximum value”; and that the variable step length becomes increasingly shorter as the absolute value of the measured average elevation change per step becomes greater. This means that on a level route (i.e. no measured average elevation change, or the measured average elevation change per step is equal to zero), the variable step length is allocated to a maximum value. The allocated value of the variable step length decreases as the absolute value of the measured average elevation change per step increases. A particularly accurate route calculation thereby becomes possible.
According to example embodiments, provision is made that the predefined step length is in a range from 50 cm to 100 cm, particularly preferably in a range from 60 cm to 80 cm, and very particularly preferably is 70 cm.
According to example embodiments, provision is made that the variable step length is zero when the absolute value of the measured average elevation change per step is greater than a predefined upper elevation change per step, the predefined upper elevation change per step being in a range from 25 cm to 35 cm, particularly preferably in a range from 27 cm to 30 cm, and very particularly preferably being 28 cm. This likewise makes it possible to improve the calculation of routes. Because the average height of a stair riser in buildings is approximately 14 cm, a step in which, for example, two stair risers are climbed or descended at once can still be classified as walking on a upward or downward slope. For greater elevation changes per step, on the other hand, a special instance must be assumed, for example climbing or descending a ladder.
According to example embodiments, provision is made that the evaluation unit is configured for averaging of the pressure signals over a time interval, the length of the time interval being equal to 1 to 10 seconds, preferably 2 to 6 seconds, and particularly preferably 3 to 4 seconds. This averaging is effected in order to reduce errors when measuring the average elevation change per step, which errors can occur as a result of movements of a user of the pedometer or because of interference with the pressure sensor signal.
According to example embodiments, provision is made that in a first region of the measured average elevation per step starting from zero up to a predefined threshold value, the variable step length is the predefined step length, i.e. corresponds to the maximum value; and that in a second region starting from a first threshold step length, the variable step length decreases as the absolute value of the measured average elevation change per step increases, the threshold value being in a range from 4 cm to 12 cm per step, preferably in a range from 6 cm to 10 cm per step, and particularly preferably being 8 cm per step, and the first threshold step length being preferably in a range from 35 cm to 60 cm and particularly preferably in a range from 40 cm to 58 cm. This threshold value is provided in addition to the time averaging of the pressure signal in order to compensate for interference with the signal of the pressure sensor.
A further aspect hereof is a method for determining the length of a route traveled on foot, a number of steps being ascertained on the basis of the acceleration signals of an acceleration sensor, and a change in geographic elevation being ascertained on the basis of the pressure signals of a pressure sensor. An adaptation of the step length to the measured average elevation change per step enables a more accurate determination of the length of the route traveled than in conventional arrangements.
A further aspect hereof is use of the above-described pedometer for dead reckoning in buildings and for the provision of location-based services.
Exemplifying embodiments of the present invention are depicted in the drawings and explained further in the description that follows.
The signals of acceleration sensor 20 and of pressure sensor 30 are delivered to evaluation unit 40, which in turn delivers the results of an evaluation of those signals to output unit 50.
In
In
In
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2009 028 069 | Jul 2009 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2010/057690 | 6/2/2010 | WO | 00 | 4/12/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/012358 | 2/3/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5724265 | Hutchings | Mar 1998 | A |
5899963 | Hutchings | May 1999 | A |
6122960 | Hutchings et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6145389 | Ebeling et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6175608 | Pyles et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6434212 | Pyles | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6585622 | Shum et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6594617 | Scherzinger | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6837827 | Lee et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6882955 | Ohlenbusch et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
7092846 | Vock et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7433805 | Vock et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7552031 | Vock et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7930135 | Ma et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8289154 | Kodrin et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8718935 | Miller et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8744804 | Messenger et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
20010022828 | Pyles | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020038178 | Talkenberg et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020107649 | Takiguchi et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030018430 | Ladetto et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040064286 | Levi et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20070132637 | Kolavennu et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080172203 | Jorgensen | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080254944 | Muri et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090018794 | Meriheina | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090043531 | Kahn et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20100280792 | Paiva Velhote Correia et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1329713 | Jan 2002 | CN |
102007043490 | Mar 2009 | DE |
1770370 | Apr 2007 | EP |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report, PCT International Application No. PCT/EP2010/057690, dated Aug. 4, 2010. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120191410 A1 | Jul 2012 | US |