The present invention relates to a peening device and to a method for the operation thereof.
As is known in the art, peening is the process of impacting a metal component with small particles generally at a right angle to the surface to be treated so as to thereby impact the surface of the metal in a direction normal thereto. The peening of the metal surface results in the material being stronger and tends to place the material in compression and relieve preexisting tensile stresses which may exist in the member. In other words, the impacting of the surface tends to place the same in compression and helps prevent fatigue, cracks and other imperfections in the surface from propagating through the surface to cause failure. The process in widely used in the aeronautical industry.
Conventional shot peening requires extensive blasting equipment and is not particularly suited to situations which require mobility of the equipment. Furthermore, in many such situations, the particles are not easily collected for recirculation. Rotary tools for shot peening are known in the art and are more adapted for applications requiring mobility. The tool will comprise a rotating shaft having drive means associated therewith and one or more flaps are attached to the shaft. Each flap has one or more hard particles or shot and the flap impacts on the work piece. Each impact produces a localized compressive stress on the surface for the reasons set forth above.
Conventional rotating peening tools are generally light weight hand tools which use a plurality of peening flaps mounted on the shaft. Each flap has one or more shot peening particles affixed to its free end and the flap is driven to impact the work surface as the flaps rotate. The art shows many different arrangements for the shot on the rotating flap.
As in any treatment, it is important to have proper control associated with the rotary peening treatment. In particular, the speed of rotation is critical in this process. At the present time, this is extremely difficult to provide since no speed controller exists.
In particular, one operator may hold the tool closer to the work piece and thus, the peening flaps strike the member to be treated at a slower pace—i.e. the rotational speed is decreased as the flap expends more energy to move past the work piece. Inversely, if the tool is held at a greater distance from the work piece whereby the outer portions of the flaps are utilized, the speed will be greater. Furthermore, the rotary peening apparatus frequently uses compressed air which often is provided through large compressors feeding several lines. When the demand on the compressor increases, the pressure in the lines might drop affecting the speed of the rotary peening apparatus.
Both the operator stability and the compressed air pressure variation, as well as several other factors, will have an impact on the speed of the rotary peening apparatus. This will have an influence on the energy transferred to the material and must therefore be kept as constant as possible to ensure a quality peening process.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a rotary peening speed control apparatus to control the rotational speed of the drive shaft and ensure proper treatment of the member being treated.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a method for rotary peening that continuously monitors and controls the speed of rotation to ensure that the operator properly treats the member to be treated.
According to one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of peening a surface comprising the steps of providing a rotary peening tool having at least one rotating flap mounted on a drive shaft and having a drive means for rotatively driving the drive shaft, operating the rotary peening tool to peen the surface, measuring the speed of the drive shaft, and controlling the drive means to maintain a desired speed.
According to a further aspect of the present invention, there is provided a peening control apparatus comprising a rotary peening tool having a drive shaft and at least one rotating flap mounted thereon, drive means for driving the drive shaft, a sensor to monitor the speed of the drive shaft, a controller to receive input from the sensor, the controller being operatively connected to the drive means to increase or decrease the rotational speed to a desired value.
The apparatus of the present invention may include any suitable peening tool, many of which are commercially available. The number of flaps and/or the number of shots on each flap are irrelevant to the practice of the present invention.
The drive means may include any suitable and thus could include hydraulic, pneumatic and electric. It suffices to say that all such means are known in the art and could be practiced with the present invention.
The controller of the present invention is designed to receive a signal from the sensor measuring the speed of the shaft and to increase and/or decrease the speed in response to the measurement. Such devices are known in the art.
According to the present invention, there is provided a control device which maintains the required operating speed of the rotary peening tool.
Maintaining the speed of the shaft is extremely important, particularly in cases where the peening has been conducted on devices such as aeronautical components.
Having thus generally described the invention, reference will be made to the accompanying drawings illustrating an embodiment thereof, in which:
Referring to the drawings in greater detail and by reference characters thereto, there is illustrated a typical rotary peening device generally designated by reference numeral 10. Such peening devices are well known in the art and have an arbour end 12 and an air inlet end 14. Arbour end 12 is designed to retain peening flaps 18. Each peening member 18 comprises a shaft 20 and a pair of flaps 22. Naturally, any desired number of peening flaps 18 may be provided and, as shown in
Referring to
The control apparatus includes a rotation speed sensor (not shown) which feeds a signal for the rotation speed sensor line 32 which is operatively connected to a microprocessor 34. Microprocessor 34 in turn sends a signal 36 to valve 26.
In operation, if the tool is being operated such that the speed of rotation is not sufficient, a signal is sent to valve 26 to increase the air pressure through air feed line 30. Inversely, if the speed of the arbour is too high, microprocessor 34 will send a signal to valve 26 to decrease the air pressure.
Naturally, other arrangements are possible. For example, if rotary peening device 10 were electrically operated, the microprocessor 34 would be similar but the corresponding electric energy adjustor would be utilized to control the speed of rotation of the arbour.
In one embodiment of the invention, the apparatus may be modified to include a software which allows the input of operator parameters. Thus, the controller would be designed to accept individual operator parameters such as speed and intensity of the peening. For example, an operator would utilize the tool on a test piece of material until a satisfactory result is achieved. The parameters for that operator could then be entered into the controller to permit operation under substantially identical conditions. A second operator may achieve results with a different speed and the tool would be operated at the desired speed.
The controller could also have means to save the process data for quality control purposes. Similarly, an alarm could be included when the conditions are not suitable.
It will be understood that the above described embodiments are for purposes of illustration only and changes and modifications may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
The present application claims priority based on U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/135,993 filed Jul. 25, 2008, the teachings of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3648498 | Voss et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
3834200 | Winter | Sep 1974 | A |
3857750 | Winter et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
4481802 | Harman et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4616496 | Hawkins | Oct 1986 | A |
4635456 | Harman et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4713952 | Senger et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
5619877 | Graf | Apr 1997 | A |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100018272 A1 | Jan 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61135993 | Jul 2008 | US |