Pen drawing computer input device

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6380929
  • Patent Number
    6,380,929
  • Date Filed
    Friday, September 20, 1996
    29 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 30, 2002
    23 years ago
Abstract
A method and system are provided for drawing or writing using an input device in computer systems. The system provides an absolute-coordinate drawing mode, in which the user may draw written strokes to which the computer system display is responsive, and a relative-coordinate repositioning mode, in which the user may figuratively “pick up the pen” and reposition the beginning of a following written stroke. The system enters the drawing mode in response to a user command, and remains in the drawing mode in response to continued written strokes. The system enters the cursor mode after a selected time period occurs with no written strokes, or in response to other user commands. In the drawing mode, a coordinate system for the touchpad is mapped to a coordinate system for a selected window on the display. The mapping is selected so that an initial position of a written stroke in the window corresponds to a final position selected during the cursor mode, so that the user is able to reposition the input device when it has (or is about to) “run off the edge” of an input tablet which is relatively smaller than the display. The system uses either a resistive touchpad input tablet, or a capacitive touchpad input tablet in conjunction with a passive stylus input device having a flexible conductive writing tip. The system alternatively provides a signature mode, in which the user is able to make a simple drawing, such as a handwritten signature.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The present invention relates to computer input devices. More particularly, the present invention relates to computer input devices which are suitable for making drawings with a pen, stylus, or finger.




2. The Prior Art




In a computer system having software for drawing, painting, or otherwise entering picture information, a user of the computer system will often desire to use an input device to draw pictures, write, or execute a signature, etc. In such cases it would be advantageous if the input device could emulate the drawing or writing behavior of a physical device with which the user is familiar, such as a physical pen with ink. When the input device acts in an unfamiliar manner, drawings created by the user may be sloppy or ill-formed and may thus result in user dissatisfaction.




One aspect of the behavior of a physical pen is that it applies ink in a written stroke, immediately visible to the user, when a writing point of the physical pen is applied to paper. At any time, the user is able to pick up the physical pen and place it elsewhere on the paper, so as to begin a new written stroke, and the user is able to determine the new location of the pen in response to written strokes which have already been drawn on the paper. One problem which has arisen in the art is that the computer system and the input device do not provide a convenient method for allowing the user to “pick up the pen” and continue to draw in a new position accurately selected by the user in response to written strokes which have already been drawn.




One known method for emulating a physical pen in a computer system is to couple an input device with a computer display, and to integrate the writing behavior of the input device with the display, so that the surface which the user appears to be drawing upon is itself dynamically responsive to drawing strokes made by the user. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 4,639,720 to Rympalski. While this method achieves the advantages of providing feedback to the user for written strokes, and of allowing the user to place the input device in a relatively exact relationship with written strokes which have already been drawn, it suffers from the drawbacks that such displays are relatively expensive and that such displays require relatively sophisticated transparent input device technology. For example, an input drawing tablet integrated with a video display can cost half as much as the computer to which it is connected. These limitations tend to restrict use of this technology to a very limited group.




A second known method for emulating a physical pen in a computer system is to provide an input tablet and stylus, in which the input tablet is capable of detecting proximity of the stylus and transmitting information regarding written strokes to a computer system for display on a monitor. An example of such a device is the Art Pad II product, available from Wacom Technology Corporation of Vancouver, Wash. While this method is relatively less expensive, it is also less successful at providing feedback to the user for written strokes, and in allowing the user to place the input device in a relatively exact relationship with written strokes which have already been drawn, because the user must draw or write with the input device on the tablet, while looking elsewhere (at the monitor) for feedback. This method also suffers from the drawback that the stylus requires electronic circuitry to assist proximity detection by the tablet. If the input device is tethered to provide an electrical connection, its ease of use and naturalness can be significantly degraded, while if the input device is not tethered, it can easily be lost, which can be quite expensive.




A third method for emulating a physical pen in a computer system is to provide a stylus having a switch which activates when a selected pressure threshold is exceeded, and which is coupled to the computer system for processing. Thus, when the user exerts relatively heavy pressure, the computer system will treat the stylus as a drawing device for creating written strokes, while when the user exerts only relatively light pressure, the computer system will merely reposition its reference point for the stylus (represented by a cursor) and allow the user to begin a written stroke from a new position.




While this method achieves the advantages of providing feedback to the user for written strokes, and in allowing the user to place the input device in a relatively exact relationship with written strokes which have already been drawn, it suffers from the drawback that it is very difficult for the user to control the exact amount of pressure being exerted, and thus causes inadvertent switching between a drawing mode and a repositioning mode, which may thus result in user dissatisfaction.




Accordingly, it would be desirable to provide a method and system for drawing or writing using a stylus as an input device in computer systems.




It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide an inexpensive input device for creating drawings on computers.




It is a further object of the present invention to provide an inexpensive input device for creating drawings on computers which eliminates the accidental switching between cursor mode and inking mode.




Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a system and method for allowing drawings to be made with relatively small tablets.




The advantages of the present invention are achieved in an embodiment of the invention in which switching between a drawing mode and a repositioning mode is convenient and natural, while using only a relatively inexpensive passive stylus and even while using a tablet or touchpad having a substantially smaller size than the computer system display.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The invention provides a method and system for drawing or writing using a passive stylus input device in computer systems. The system provides an absolute-coordinate drawing mode, in which the user may draw written strokes to which the computer system display is responsive, and a relative-coordinate repositioning mode (herein sometimes called a “cursor” mode), in which the user may figuratively “pick up the pen” and reposition the beginning of a following written stroke. The system enters the drawing mode in response to a user command (such as a drawing gesture, tap performed on the input tablet, or selected keyboard command), and remains in the drawing mode in response to continued written strokes. The system enters the cursor mode after a selected time period occurs with no written strokes, or in response to other system events (such as keyboard input).




In the drawing mode, a coordinate system for the touchpad is mapped to a coordinate system for a selected window on the display. The mapping is selected so that an initial position of a written stroke in the window corresponds to a final position selected during the previous cursor mode, so that the user is able to reposition the input device in the case when it has (or was about to) “run off the edge” of an input tablet which is relatively smaller than the display.




In a presently preferred embodiment, the system uses either a resistive touchpad input tablet, or a capacitive touchpad input tablet in conjunction with a stylus having a flexible conductive writing tip.




In alternative embodiments, the system provides a signature mode, in which the user is able to make a simple drawing, such as a handwritten signature.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING FIGURES





FIG. 1

is a block diagram of an input device for creating drawings on computers according to the present invention.





FIG. 2

is a flowchart describing the operation of the method of the present invention, showing the processing of the inputs as a busy-wait loop.





FIG. 3

is a flowchart describing the touchpad packet processing of the current invention.





FIG. 4

is a diagram illustrating how to perform the mapping of the coordinate systems in the system of the present invention.





FIG. 5

is a flowchart illustrating how to compute the parameters s,Xo, and Yo in the system of the present invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT




Those of ordinary skill in the art will realize that the following description of the present invention is illustrative only and not in any way limiting. Other embodiments of the invention will readily suggest themselves to such skilled persons.




Referring first to

FIG. 1

, a block diagram of a drawing input system


10


according to the present invention is shown. In the preferred embodiment, a user will use a conductive-tipped pen or stylus


12


to write on a capacitive touchpad


14


. The capacitive touchpad can operate in numerous ways, including, but not limited to, the principles disclosed in either U.S. Pat. No. 5,374,787 to Miller et al. or U.S. Pat. No. 5,305,017 to Gerpheide. The use of a conductive-tipped pen used with a capacitive touch pad is disclosed in the prior art, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,639,720 to Rympalski.




Those of ordinary skill in the art will also appreciate that the invention disclosed herein also applies to any tablet without a display or proximity sensing, such as a resistive tablet. The output of the capacitive touchpad


14


is sent to a touchpad driver


16


, which normally processes the (X,Y,Z) absolute mode output of the touchpad into relative mode packets sent to the operating system


18


. Such conversion from absolute mode information to relative mode packets is well-known in the art. The operating system


18


then controls a display


20


, including the position of a cursor


22


, and any graphics in a window


24


. The operating system receives input from a keyboard


26


.




The steps described in this invention are executed by a coordinate processor


28


, which has access to the absolute mode information from the touchpad in the form of absolute data packets. The coordinate processor can also prevent the touchpad driver


16


from issuing relative mode packets to the operating system. In addition, the coordinate processor


28


communicates with the operating system to accept keyboard input from keyboard


26


, draw graphics in window


24


, and manipulate the cursor


22


. The coordinate processor


28


will typically be part of a graphics application as known in the art.




The method of operation of the coordinate processor


28


can best be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art if expressed as pseudo-code. The pseudo-code set forth below in Table 1 describes the currently preferred embodiment of the invention. Other embodiments are readily apparent to those skilled in the art.












TABLE 1









Pseudocode























The touch pad starts in relative mouse mode






Has the user hit a space bar or performed a tap gesture in relative mouse mode?






{













Turn off system cursor motion and behavior







Display a cross cursor







Set timer to 3 seconds







Let offset = current cursor position in touchpad coordinates







Let firstInk = TRUE







Let currentStroke = empty







A:







Is there a touchpad (X,Y,Z) packet available?







{













pnt = (X,Y)







if (Z > threshold)







{













if (firstInk)







{













firstInk = FALSE







stop displaying cursor







let offset = offset-pnt













}







reset timer to 400 milliseconds







pnt = pnt+offset







if (currentStroke is not empty)







{













draw line from prevPnt to pnt













}







append pnt to currentStroke







let prevPnt = pnt













}







else if (currentStroke is not empty)







{













save currentStroke in data structure







let currentStroke = empty stroke













}













}







Has the timer expired?







{













Turn system cursor back on







Display system cursor







Return to relative mouse mode













}







goto A











}














FIG.


2


and

FIG. 3

describe the method of the present invention as a flowchart. Referring first to

FIG. 2.

, the touchpad driver starts in relative mouse mode at step


40


. Step


42


determines whether the space bar has been pressed or a tap gesture has been executed. If not, the touchpad driver stays in relative mouse mode. Other keystrokes or gestures can be used in step


42


, as is obvious to those skilled in the art.




Alternatively, if a pen with a switch or button is used, activating the switch or button can place the system in absolute mode. Furthermore, in a message-based operating system like Windows 95, the CPU does not need to execute an infinite loop to wait for a keystroke or a touchpad gesture. The coordinate processor will remain idle until a keystroke message or a gesture message is sent to it.




If the space bar has been pressed, or the tap gesture has been executed, the coordinate processor then will instruct the touchpad driver to turn off relative mode mouse packets at step


44


. This step ensures that the absolute mode motions will not be interpreted by the operating system as mouse moves or button clicks. At step


46


, the coordinate processor will then display a cross cursor at the current cursor position. The cross cursor is a hint to the user that the system is in absolute mode. Step


46


is an optional enhancement to the system and is not necessary to the invention. At step


48


, the coordinate processor sets a timer to three seconds. This timer will send a signal to the coordinate processor three seconds after step


48


has executed, then the timer will expire.




The purpose of the timer is to automatically set the system back into relative mouse mode when the timer expires, with no intervention of the user. If the user selects absolute mode, three seconds are allotted to draw something, or the system will revert back to relative mode. The interval of three seconds is illustrative and is not limiting in any way: it can be set to according to a user preference; Those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the time needs to be greater than 500 milliseconds or else it will time out before the user can start drawing.




Step


50


will set the offset variable to be the current cursor position mapped into the touchpad coordinate system.

FIG. 4

further explains how to perform the mapping of the coordinate systems: The offset variable is used to create the following behavior: The user will position the mouse cursor where it is desired to draw ink. Then, no matter where on the touchpad they start to draw ink, the first ink point will be aligned with the last cursor position. The offset variable will be used to compute the translation of the touchpad coordinate system to ensure this behavior. Step


52


sets the variable firstink to be TRUE. The firstink variable will be used in the offset computation. Step


54


then sets the currentStroke variable to be a new, empty stroke. As the user draws a figure, the coordinates of the current stroke will be stored in the currentStroke variable, which can be a list or an array. As will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art, steps


44


through


54


may be performed in any order.




After step


54


, the coordinate processor is ready to accept input from either the touchpad or the timer. At step


56


, the coordinate processor determines whether a touchpad packet is available. Such a packet comprises the X, Y, and Z (pressure) data at one point in time reported by the touchpad driver. If such a packet is available, then the touchpad packet processing to be described with reference to

FIG. 3

is invoked at step


58


. In any event, the coordinate processor then determines at step


60


whether the timer has expired. If it has, then step


62


will instruct the touchpad driver to allow the production of relative mode mouse packets. Step


64


then restores the display of the system cursor. Steps


62


and


64


may be performed in any order. The system will then go back to step


40


.




In the flow diagram of

FIG. 2

, the processing of these inputs is illustrated as a busy-wait loop. As in step


42


, it is obvious to those skilled in the art that the coordinate processor will wait for either a touchpad packet message or a timer message, and will otherwise remain idle.




Referring now to

FIG. 3

, a flow diagram describes the touchpad packet processing according to the presently preferred embodiment of the current invention. The processing begins at step


70


, where the variable pnt is loaded with the X and Y positions on the touchpad. Step


72


then determines whether the Z value (the pressure) is above a threshold. If this value is above the threshold, then the pen or finger has been applied to the touchpad. If this value is below threshold, then the pen or finger pressure is considered to be too small for reliable measurement. If the Z value is above threshold, then processing flows to step


74


, where the variable firstink is examined. If firstink is TRUE, then the offset computation is finished in steps


76


through


80


, which may be performed in any order. Step


76


sets firstlnk to FALSE, in order to ensure that the offset processing happens only once every time through the processing of FIG.


2


. Step


78


then stops displaying the cross cursor and step


80


subtracts the value of the pnt variable from the value of the stored offset variable. After step


80


, the offset variable contains the translation necessary to align the first ink position with the original cursor position. After step


80


, or if firstlnk is FALSE at step


74


, processing flows to step


82


.




Step


82


will reset the timer. As presently preferred, the timer interval is 400 milliseconds. This interval is illustrative only and can be tuned for user preference. If no packets are received for 400 milliseconds whose Z values are above threshold, then the timer will expire and the system will revert to relative mouse mode. Step


84


performs the offset translation discussed at step


80


, above. Steps


82


and


84


may be performed in any order.




Step


86


determines whether the current stroke is empty. If it is not empty, then the processor draws a line from the previous point (whose location is stored in the variable prevpnt) to the current point at otep


88


. This line is drawn in the window


24


of the display


20


, hence is computed in the window's coordinate system. In any event, step


90


is executed, which appends the current point location to the current stroke. Finally, step


92


will assign the value of the current point to the prevPnt variable. Control will then flow back to

FIG. 2

at step


94


.




If at step


72


, the Z value is below threshold, then step


96


determines whether the current stroke is empty. If it is not, then the Z value dropping below threshold signals the end of the stroke. Step


98


then saves the current stroke in a data structure of the application. The data structure is necessary for redisplay, saving to disk, or further processing. As is obvious to those of ordinary skill in the art, the structure can be a list or array of all strokes drawn so far. Step


100


then creates a new empty stroke and assigns it to the currentStroke variable. If the current stroke is empty at step


96


, or after stroke


100


, then control flows back to

FIG. 2

at step


94


.




Step


98


is the output step of the entire coordinate processing. The preferred embodiment assumes that the touchpad will produce at least one below-threshold packet after a stroke is finished. If that is not the case, then steps


96


,


98


, and


100


must also be performed between steps


64


and


40


of the flowchart of FIG.


2


.





FIG. 4

shows the details of the coordinate mapping used in steps


50


(

FIG. 2

) and


88


(FIG.


3


). The touchpad


14


has a bounding box Lt, Rt, Bt, and Tt, as shown in FIG.


4


. The window


24


has a bounding box Lw, Rw, Bw, and Tw. Step


50


needs to map window coordinates (X;Y) back into touchpad coordinates (X,Y). Hence, it uses the mapping


102


. Step


88


needs to map touchpad coordinates (X,Y)into window coordinates(X,Y) so it uses mapping


104


. Mappings


102


and


104


are linear mappings which can map any rectangle into any other similarly shaped rectangle, depending on the values of the parameters Xo, and Yo. The mappings are chosen to preserve the aspect ratio of any input drawings, in order to eliminate distortion.




According to the presently preferred embodiment of the invention, the parameters s, Xo, and Yo are computed via the method illustrated in the flowchart of FIG.


5


. These parameters depend on the current size of window


24


at the time either of steps


50


or


88


are executed. The method illustrated in

FIG. 5

will determine the mappings of the touchpad into the largest possible rectangle that fits and is centered within the current window while still preserving the aspect ratio of the touchpad. Step


110


computes the scaling that would make the horizontal extent of the touchpad


14


map to the horizontal extent of the window


24


. Step


112


computes the scaling that would make the vertical extent of the touchpad


14


map to the vertical extent of the window


24


. Steps


110


and


112


can be performed in any order. Step


114


compares the absolute values of these two scalings. Steps


116


and


118


choose the scaling that has the smallest absolute value. The scalings can be negative, due to differences in handedness of the coordinate systems. Steps


120


and


122


compute the translation necessary to bring the center of the touchpad


14


to the center of the window


24


. Steps


120


and


122


can be performed in any order. The offset applied at step


84


of the flowchart of

FIG. 3

applies a translation in addition to the translation computed at steps


120


and


122


.




Simple variations on the preferred embodiment will be obvious to those skilled in the art. For example, the preferred embodiment of the present invention describes a drawing program. A painting program can be easily created with the same user interface, where the output of the coordinate processor


28


is not a list of strokes, but is the final bitmap in the window


24


. Also, the drawing program can quite easily be made to zoom and pan, by adding a third coordinate system for the stored data. Steps


50


(

FIG. 2

) and


70


(

FIG. 3

) could easily be modified to produce positions in the third coordinate system.




As an alternative embodiment, the coordinate processor


28


can be dramatically simplified, in order to provide a user interface for very simple drawings, such as a signature. Most users know how to write their signature in one fluid motion and do not need to reposition the cursor in between strokes. Therefore, steps


50


,


80


, and


84


can be omitted. In this case, the mapping between the touchpad coordinates and the window coordinates will not be translated by the offset variable. In addition, a new step


50


can be added to empty the entire data structure of the application, so that one tap or keystroke can capture an entire signature.




While embodiments and applications of this invention have been shown and described, it would be apparent to those skilled in the art that many more modifications than mentioned above are possible without departing from the inventive concepts herein. The invention, therefore, is not to be restricted except in the spirit of the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A method of using a drawing input device comprising:starting a touchpad driver in a relative mouse mode, wherein mouse packets are on; detecting a user draw command; disabling relative mouse mode in response to said user draw command, wherein said mouse packets are off; providing an offset value for the start of a first drawing stroke equal to the present cursor position; processing information defining user input drawing strokes; and enabling relative mouse mode after a fixed time period during which no user input drawing strokes have been made, wherein said mouse packets are on.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 further comprising:disabling a system cursor and enabling a draw mode cursor in response to said user draw command; and disabling said draw cursor and enabling said system cursor after said fixed time period.
US Referenced Citations (124)
Number Name Date Kind
2219497 Stevens et al. Oct 1940 A
RE23030 Holt Aug 1948 E
3128458 Romero Apr 1964 A
3207905 Bray Sep 1965 A
3244369 Nassimbene Apr 1966 A
3401470 Gaven Sep 1968 A
3437795 Kuljian Apr 1969 A
3482241 Johnson Dec 1969 A
3492440 Cerbone et al. Jan 1970 A
3493791 Adelson et al. Feb 1970 A
3497617 Ellis et al. Feb 1970 A
3497966 Gaven Mar 1970 A
3516176 Cleary et al. Jun 1970 A
3522664 Lambright et al. Aug 1970 A
3530310 Adelson et al. Sep 1970 A
3543056 Klein Nov 1970 A
3549909 Adelson et al. Dec 1970 A
3593115 Dym et al. Jul 1971 A
3598903 Johnson et al. Aug 1971 A
3662378 MacArthur May 1972 A
3675239 Ackerman et al. Jul 1972 A
3683371 Holz Aug 1972 A
3696409 Braaten Oct 1972 A
3732389 Kaelin et al. May 1973 A
3737670 Larson Jun 1973 A
3757322 Barkan et al. Sep 1973 A
3760392 Stich Sep 1973 A
3773989 Hacon Nov 1973 A
3875331 Halsenbalg Apr 1975 A
3921166 Volpe Nov 1975 A
3931610 Marin et al. Jan 1976 A
3932862 Graven Jan 1976 A
3974332 Abe et al. Aug 1976 A
3992579 Dym et al. Nov 1976 A
3999012 Dym Dec 1976 A
4056699 Jordan Nov 1977 A
4058765 Richardson et al. Nov 1977 A
4071691 Pepper, Jr. Jan 1978 A
4087625 Dym et al. May 1978 A
4103252 Bobick Jul 1978 A
4129747 Pepper, Jr. Dec 1978 A
4148014 Burson Apr 1979 A
4177354 Mathews Dec 1979 A
4177421 Thornburg Dec 1979 A
4198539 Pepper, Jr. Apr 1980 A
4221975 Ledniczki et al. Sep 1980 A
4224615 Penz Sep 1980 A
4246452 Chandler Jan 1981 A
4257117 Besson Mar 1981 A
4264903 Bigelow Apr 1981 A
4281323 Burnett et al. Jul 1981 A
4290052 Eichelberger et al. Sep 1981 A
4290061 Serrano Sep 1981 A
4291303 Cutler et al. Sep 1981 A
4293734 Pepper, Jr. Oct 1981 A
4302011 Pepper, Jr. Nov 1981 A
4310839 Schwerdt Jan 1982 A
4313113 Thornburg Jan 1982 A
4334219 Paülus et al. Jun 1982 A
4371746 Pepper, Jr. Feb 1983 A
4398181 Yamamoto Aug 1983 A
4423286 Bergeron Dec 1983 A
4430917 Pepper, Jr. Feb 1984 A
4442317 Jandrell Apr 1984 A
4455452 Schuyler Jun 1984 A
4475235 Graham Oct 1984 A
4476463 Ng et al. Oct 1984 A
4511760 Garwin et al. Apr 1985 A
4550221 Mabusth Oct 1985 A
4554409 Mitsui et al. Nov 1985 A
4570149 Thornburg et al. Feb 1986 A
4582955 Blesser Apr 1986 A
4595913 Aubuchon Jun 1986 A
4616107 Abe et al. Oct 1986 A
4639720 Rympalski et al. Jan 1987 A
4672154 Rodgers et al. Jun 1987 A
4680430 Yoshikawa et al. Jul 1987 A
4686332 Greanias et al. Aug 1987 A
4733222 Evans Mar 1988 A
4734685 Watanabe Mar 1988 A
4736191 Matzke et al. Apr 1988 A
4737773 Kobayashi Apr 1988 A
4758690 Kimura Jul 1988 A
4766423 Ono et al. Aug 1988 A
4788385 Kimura Nov 1988 A
4794208 Watson Dec 1988 A
4817034 Hardin, Sr. et al. Mar 1989 A
4820886 Watson Apr 1989 A
4853498 Meadows et al. Aug 1989 A
4914624 Dunthorn Apr 1990 A
4918262 Flowers et al. Apr 1990 A
4922061 Meadows et al. May 1990 A
4935728 Kley Jun 1990 A
4988982 Rayner et al. Jan 1991 A
5016008 Gruaz et al. May 1991 A
5120907 Shinbori et al. Jun 1992 A
5146049 Shima Sep 1992 A
5149919 Greanias et al. Sep 1992 A
5164713 Bain Nov 1992 A
5194862 Edwards Mar 1993 A
5220649 Forcier Jun 1993 A
5231450 Daniels Jul 1993 A
5239140 Kuroda et al. Aug 1993 A
5260697 Barrett et al. Nov 1993 A
5270711 Knapp Dec 1993 A
5272470 Zetts Dec 1993 A
5327161 Logan et al. Jul 1994 A
5369227 Stone Nov 1994 A
5373118 Watson Dec 1994 A
5374787 Miller et al. Dec 1994 A
5408593 Kotaki et al. Apr 1995 A
5455906 Usuda Oct 1995 A
5488204 Mead et al. Jan 1996 A
5517578 Altman et al. May 1996 A
5530879 Crump et al. Jun 1996 A
5543588 Bisset et al. Aug 1996 A
5642131 Pekelney et al. Jun 1997 A
5666113 Logan Sep 1997 A
5764218 Della Bona et al. Jun 1998 A
5861583 Schediwy et al. Jan 1999 A
5880411 Gillespie et al. Mar 1999 A
5914465 Allen et al. Jun 1999 A
5942733 Allen et al. Aug 1999 A
6028271 Gillespie et al. Feb 2000 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (17)
Number Date Country
0 187 372 Dec 1985 EP
0 490 001 Jun 1992 EP
0 609 021 Jul 1993 EP
0 574 213 Dec 1993 EP
2 662 528 May 1990 FR
2 139 762 Nov 1984 GB
2139762 Nov 1984 GB
2 266 038 Oct 1993 GB
60 205625 Oct 1985 JP
62 126427 Jun 1987 JP
62 126428 Jun 1987 JP
63 073415 Apr 1988 JP
0 040614 Feb 1990 JP
04 015725 Jan 1992 JP
06 139022 May 1994 JP
9103039 Aug 1989 WO
9105327 Apr 1991 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (5)
Entry
Spider et al., Bill “SuperPaint” Manual pp. ii-91, 1987.*
“Double-Click Generation Method for Pen Operations”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Nov. 1992, vol. 35, No. 6, p. 3.
“Three-Axis Touch Sensitive Pad”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Jan. 1987, vol. 29, No. 8, pp. 3451-3453.
Chun, et al., “A High-Performance Silicon Tactile Imager Based on a Capacitive Cell”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, Jul. 1985, vol. ED-32, No. 7, pp. 1196-1201.
Tiburtius, “Transparente Folientastaturen”, Feinwerktechnik & Messtechnik 97, Jul. 1989, No. 7, pp. 299-300.