The technical field of the invention is that of fin assembly-stabilized projectiles, and more particularly that of explosive and penetrating projectiles.
Explosive projectiles that also have penetrating capability are intended to penetrate armored protection and explode behind the protection.
To achieve this, the body of the projectile has a reinforced warhead and the fuze ensuring the firing of the explosive charge is located at a rear part (or base) of the projectile so as not to be destroyed by the impact.
However, the fin assembly of the projectiles always forms a mass that remains behind the fuze and may disrupt the operation of the fuze on impact.
The aim of the invention is therefore to propose a penetrating and explosive projectile with an architecture that does not disturb or destroy the fuze on impact on a target.
The invention thus relates to a penetrating and explosive projectile provided with a trajectory-stabilizing fin assembly which is secured to a body of the projectile by a mechanical connection, the fin assembly including a tapped tube which engages on a threaded rear cylindrical shank of a tail connected to the projectile body, thereby forming a threaded mechanical connection between the fin assembly and the body, the projectile being characterized in that it includes means ensuring the fragilization of the threaded connection on impact on a target, the fin assembly then separating from the projectile body.
In a particular embodiment, the projectile has a fuze arranged at a rear part of the projectile and the tail carrying the fin assembly includes a conical portion which connects to the body of the projectile.
The fin assembly may also include fragilization means consisting of breakage initiators arranged on the tube of the tail, between the fins of the consisting of, wherein said breakage initiators are made as longitudinal grooves that ensure a thinning of the thickness of the tube, the inertial advance motion of the fin assembly on the conical portion, upon impact of the projectile on a target, causing the grooves to break.
Each fin may include a conical front part cooperating with the conical portion of the tail.
The front part of the tube may also include a conical part in continuation of the conical front parts of the fins.
The invention will be better understood upon reading the following description of various embodiments, description made with reference to the annexed drawings in which:
Referring to
The explosive charge 3 is intended to be initiated by a detonation relay 5 which is itself initiated by a fuze 6 which is arranged in a base 7 secured to the rear part of the body 2, for example by a thread.
The projectile 1 also includes a stabilizing fin assembly 8 which is secured to the body 2 of the projectile by means of a threaded mechanical connection that includes a tail 9. This tail 9 includes a rear cylindrical shank 10, extended at the front by a conical portion 11 which connects to the body 2 of the projectile at a threaded bearing surface 12 of the base 7.
The cylindrical shank 10 includes a thread on which is screwed a tapped tube 14 that carries the fins 15 of the fin assembly 8. The thread of the shank 10 and the tapped hole of the tube 14 form the threaded connection 13.
As can be seen in
According to the invention, the projectile 1 includes means ensuring the fragilization of the threaded connection 13 between the thread of the shank 10 and the tapped hole of the tube 14 upon impact of the projectile on a target.
Thus, the inertial forces exerted on the fin assembly 8 at the impact will cause the fragilization means to break, thus ensuring the separation of the fin assembly 8 and the body 2 of the projectile 1.
For example, a simple transverse groove on the shank 10, between the threaded part and the conical portion 11, could be defined as fragilization means.
This groove will weaken the shank 10 which will break upon impact on a target.
The fin assembly 8 will then detach from the projectile 1 and will not interfere with the operation of the fuze.
It should be noted that the external profile of the conical portion 11 also ensures a deflection of the fin assembly 8, thus protecting the fuze 6 against the impacts caused by the latter.
It can be seen in
Therefore, if the fins 15 or the fin assembly 8 hit the projectile body 2, the impact will occur at a distance from the fuze 6 and will not disrupt the operation of the fuze.
In a particular embodiment of the invention, it is noted in
These grooves 19 ensure a thinning of the thickness of the tube 14 and constitute breakage initiators for the wall of the tube 14. It is also noted that each fin 15 includes a front part with conical profile 20 which is intended to cooperate with the conical portion 11 of the tail 9. This front part with conical profile 20 also extends at the front part of the tube 14 which is also conical.
As can be seen in
This advance motion of the fin assembly 8 leads to a sliding of the conical part 20 of each fin 15 (and of the tube 14) on the profile of the conical portion 11 of the tail 9. This results in a radial stress leading to an enlargement of the internal diameter of the tube 14. This stress causes the grooves 19 to break and the fins 15 to move away from each other (arrows A1 and A2).
Each fin 15 thus follows a trajectory that moves it away from the fuze 6.
Such an arrangement makes the breakage of the threaded connection 13 more reliable and ensures that the impacts that the fin assembly 8 could cause on the fuze 6 are reduced to a minimum.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2010626 | Oct 2020 | FR | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3687398 | Beuschel | Aug 1972 | A |
3788230 | Losfeld | Jan 1974 | A |
4671179 | Synofzik | Jun 1987 | A |
4730561 | Schaake | Mar 1988 | A |
4863428 | Chevalier | Sep 1989 | A |
4995573 | Wallow | Feb 1991 | A |
5014931 | Mikhail | May 1991 | A |
5088416 | Sabranski | Feb 1992 | A |
5097766 | Campoli | Mar 1992 | A |
5107766 | Schliesske | Apr 1992 | A |
5112008 | Pahnke | May 1992 | A |
5158509 | Ebaugh | Oct 1992 | A |
5388523 | Rossmann | Feb 1995 | A |
5798479 | Bonamy | Aug 1998 | A |
6109185 | Mikhail | Aug 2000 | A |
6540176 | Davis | Apr 2003 | B2 |
7150235 | Mikhail | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7581501 | Boone | Sep 2009 | B1 |
8887641 | Manole | Nov 2014 | B1 |
9470491 | Ginetto | Oct 2016 | B1 |
10352668 | Hooke | Jul 2019 | B1 |
20020088897 | Davis | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20040055502 | Hunn | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20100237186 | Fu | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20120048991 | Frey, Jr. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2008238615 | Nov 2009 | AU |
2683005 | Oct 2008 | CA |
30 38 087 | May 1982 | DE |
39 33 442 | Apr 1991 | DE |
198 35 175 | Dec 2005 | DE |
19948710 | Mar 2006 | DE |
690283 | Jan 1996 | EP |
2241307 | Aug 1991 | GB |
2283182 | May 1995 | GB |
WO-2011112668 | Sep 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Jun. 17, 2021 Search Report and Written Opinion issued in French Patent Application No. 2010626. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220214149 A1 | Jul 2022 | US |