The disclosure generally relates to munitions and, more particularly, to projectiles that can penetrate reactive armor.
Explosive reactive armor is a type of vehicle armor that is designed to reduce the amount of penetration of projectiles, e.g., anti-tank rounds. In general, explosive reactive armor includes an explosive material sandwiched between two plates, e.g., metal plates. The plates and explosive material form a block-like module. Numerous modules are distributed over the base armor of a vehicle, e.g., tank, in order to form a protective layer of explosive reactive armor.
Generally speaking, in operation the explosive reactive armor is designed to deflect a projectile by altering the angle of incidence of the projectile to prevent the projectile from perforating the base armor of the vehicle. More particularly, as the projectile impacts the outermost plate of an explosive reactive armor module, the explosive material ignites. The ignition of the explosive material causes the two plates of the module to be driven apart. As the outer (or cover) plate is driven outward into the projectile, the outer plate damages, e.g., breaks or bends, the penetrator rod of the projectile. As the inner plate is driven inward away from the projectile, a longer path-length is created for the projectile, thereby reducing the chance that the projectile will perforate the vehicle's base armor.
This disclosure generally describes a penetrator round assembly having a main penetrator rod and nose designed to penetrate explosive reactive armor. Using various techniques described in this disclosure, the penetrator round assembly perforates explosive reactive armor (“ERA”) cover plates and absorbs the initial energy from the moving ERA plates without significantly bending the main penetrator rod.
In one example, this disclosure is directed to a penetrator round assembly comprising a main penetrator rod comprising a tungsten alloy, and a solid nose engaged to the main penetrator rod.
In another example, this disclosure is directed to a penetrator round assembly comprising a main penetrator rod comprising a tungsten alloy, and a solid steel nose engaged to the main penetrator rod, wherein a ratio of a length of the main penetrator rod and a diameter of the main penetrator rod is greater than about 25.
In another example, this disclosure is directed to a penetrator round assembly comprising a main penetrator rod comprising a tungsten alloy, and a solid steel nose engaged to the main penetrator rod, wherein a ratio of a length of the main penetrator rod and a diameter of the main penetrator rod is greater than about 25, wherein neither the main penetrator rod nor the nose comprise depleted uranium, and wherein the main penetrator rod does not comprise cobalt.
The details of one or more aspects of the disclosure are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
In general, this disclosure describes a penetrator round assembly having a main penetrator rod and nose designed to penetrate explosive reactive armor. The penetrator round assembly includes a solid steel nose that is sufficiently robust to perforate explosive reactive armor (“ERA”) cover plates and absorb the initial energy from the moving ERA cover plates without significantly bending the main penetrator rod of the assembly. In addition, the main penetrator rod of the assembly has a greater bending stiffness than other penetrator round assemblies, thereby allowing the main penetrator rod of this disclosure to absorb the grinding interaction of moving ERA cover plates better than the other penetrator round assemblies. In addition, the penetrator round assembly described in this disclosure allows a user to engage enemy vehicles, e.g., tanks, at longer ranges as compared to other penetrator round assemblies. A longer engagement range increases the chance that the user will survive the encounter with enemy forces.
In accordance with this disclosure, main penetrator rod 32, in contrast to other penetrator round assemblies currently available, does not include depleted uranium. Rather, main penetrator rod 32 is comprised of an alloy containing a minimum of 90% tungsten by weight. The tungsten alloy of main penetrator rod 32 does not, however, include cobalt.
In addition and in accordance with this disclosure, nose 34 is comprised of solid steel, e.g., solid stainless steel. Nose 34 does not include depleted uranium. Because of its solid design, nose 34 will perforate ERA cover plates, ignite the explosive material, and absorb the initial energy from the moving ERA cover plates without significantly bending the main penetrator rod of the assembly. As the ERA cover plates move, the cover plates erode away nose 34 rather than damaging main penetrator rod 32. In this manner, nose 34 can be thought of as a sacrificial element. That is, nose 34 takes the brunt of the effects of the explosion from the ERA, thereby allowing main penetrator rod 32 to continue straight without substantially bending or deflecting. While this disclosure refers specifically to a solid steel nose, it should be noted that nose 34 may be made of a material other than steel, provided that the material has a density that is greater than or equal to steel.
In contrast to nose 34, other currently available penetrator round assemblies utilizes hollow steel noses. The hollow steel nose design acts as a windshield for the round and is used for aerodynamic purposes rather than for penetrating cover plates, as described in this disclosure.
In addition and in accordance with this disclosure, main penetrator rod 32 has a diameter of greater than 24 mm. In one example configuration, main penetrator rod 32 has a diameter of about 25 mm. By utilizing a diameter greater than 24 mm, main penetrator rod 32 can absorb the grinding interaction of moving ERA plates better than rods with small diameters due to its increased bending stiffness. The bending stiffness of the main penetrator rod is proportional to the diameter of the road raised to the 4th power. For example a 25 mm diameter rod is approximately 67% stiffer than a 22 mm diameter rod (254/224=1.67). Importantly, the length-to-diameter ratio is greater than about 25 for the penetrator round assembly.
In addition and as indicated above, main penetrator rod 32 does not include depleted uranium. Rather, main penetrator rod 32 is comprised of a tungsten alloy. The alloy comprises at least 90% tungsten and further includes nickel and iron, but does not include cobalt.
Various aspects of the disclosure have been described. These and other aspects are within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3545383 | Lucy | Dec 1970 | A |
3888636 | Sczerzenie et al. | Jun 1975 | A |
4108072 | Trinks et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4559876 | Bocker et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4823703 | Donaldson | Apr 1989 | A |
4836108 | Kegel et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4841868 | Jackson | Jun 1989 | A |
4872409 | Becker et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4939997 | Hoffman | Jul 1990 | A |
5223667 | Anderson | Jun 1993 | A |
5442989 | Anderson | Aug 1995 | A |
5445079 | Boual | Aug 1995 | A |
5936191 | Bisping et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6035501 | Bisping et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6085661 | Halverson et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6186072 | Hickerson, Jr. et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6662726 | Steiner | Dec 2003 | B1 |
7231876 | Kellner | Jun 2007 | B2 |
8522687 | Liu | Sep 2013 | B2 |
20040158969 | Ortmann et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050109233 | Eches et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20130125774 | Volkmann | May 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3802002 | Aug 1989 | DE |
0943887 | Sep 1999 | EP |
987513 | Mar 2000 | EP |
2597416 | May 2013 | EP |
2629581 | Oct 1989 | FR |
2648222 | Dec 1990 | FR |
579205 | Jul 1946 | GB |
1095992 | Dec 1967 | GB |
1514908 | Jun 1978 | GB |
2257238 | Jan 1993 | GB |
Entry |
---|
Jane's Ammunition Handbook, “105 mm L52 APDS-T cartridge (United Kingdom), Tank and anti-tank guns”, International Defence Industry Exhibition, Jul. 6, 2010, http://articles.janes.com/articles/Janes-Ammunition-Handbook/105-mm-L52-APDS-T-cartridge-United-Kingdom.html. |
Terminal Balistics, “Small caliber terminal ballistics”, Citizendia, http://www.citizendia.org/Terminal—ballistics; Aug. 2011. |
Keij T., “Description and validation of an improved frangible armour piercing munition model”, TNO Defence Research, Jun. 1993. |
Stubberfield, J., Lynch, N., and Wallis, I. “Comparisons of Unitary and Jacketed Rod Penetration Into Semi-Infinite and Oblique Plate Targets at System Equivalent Velocities” http://ciar.org/ttk/mbt/papers/lakowski.2006-09/ISB—22—Comparison—of Unitary—and—Jacketed—Rod—Penetrators.pdf. |
Caldwell, J. and Bolton, C., “United States Army Weapons Systems 2002”, http://205.153.241.62/FA45—D085/GFI/CGSC/c400S/lib—docs/docs/WSH.pdf. |
DiGiulian, Tony, “Definitions and Information about Naval Guns, Part 2—Ammunition, Fuzes, Projectiles and Propellants”, Jun. 20, 2011, http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/Gun—Data—p2.htm. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130125774 A1 | May 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61562771 | Nov 2011 | US |