Many devices have been created in an attempt to aid firearm users in holding a steady point of aim while firing. These devices and combinations thereof, so far, present the possibility of improvement for offering the market a combination of cost effective stability in point of aim, safety for themselves and safety for their equipment simultaneously. Any device that requires the user to contact the rifle during detonation subjects the point of aim of said rifle to human motion contamination and subjects the user to recoil. Locking firearms into a stationary or heavy vice-like apparatus risks equipment damage during recoil and creates a different point of impact relative to that achieved without using these particular embodiments. In other prior art, the embodiments may provide desired stability while sacrificing in categories such as safety, ease of installation, spectrum of firearms serviced, interchangeability during shooting sessions, assembly time, cost, durability, maintenance, storage requirements, consistency and size. When specifically considering safety, a product capable of requiring the continuous presence of the user as well as a simple, yet continuous, and assertive interaction by said user in order to create the conditions necessary for detonation and furthermore becoming unable to provide detonation in the absence of this presence and interaction would be greatly beneficial to the market.
Rifle users in particular have demonstrated that they provide strong market demand for various devices from rifle rests to electronic remotes as they try to meticulously sight their rifles in safely, without pain and despite many existing handicaps. Below, a simple yet effective solution to increase the efficiency of embodiments of rifle rests already available by offering a new embodiment of remote trigger release is outlined for introduction to an evident market.
The five drawings are intended to show an efficient embodiment of the invention from multiple viewpoints during its use. It is helpful first to define the two “states” which this machine is seen in the figures. When the machine is in contact with the rifle's trigger and therefore prepared to detonate a round, please consider this an “active state.” When the machine is not engaged or in contact with the trigger and is therefore incapable of creating a detonation please consider this an “inactive state.”
Below is a summary of components of a perferred embodiment.
The various devices used to hold the point of aim for a rifle steady could be outfitted with cost effective and safe remote trigger release that separates users from recoil and eliminates the effects of their inevitable motion on the steady point of aim. In
In
Various embodiments of the basic elements are possible. Multiple configurations have been tested in the time since the provisional application was filed. The provisional patent application No. 62/576,196 shows an embodiment with multiple sections of conduit with varying physical properties and functions that it was discovered could be simplified, manufactured and packaged more efficiently while performing the various functions with greater effectiveness. It is possible to strip various aspects of the most effective embodiment tested thus far with relatively obvious trade-offs that other manufacturers may be willing to sacrifice in an attempt to compete prematurely. The claims outlined below are an attempt to provide protection from such events and the description of the various embodiments imagined and manufactured is also outlined.
Simplification of the device featured in the main description could be put forth as a new embodiment by simply placing an expandable bladder without the described hinged apparatus into the trigger guard that would fall from said trigger guard by means of gravity when the pneumatic pump outfitted with safety valve is disengaged. In the opinion of the inventor this particular embodiment would not provide the “feel” and consistency that the featured embodiment is capable of. This embodiment could be simplified further by removing the safety valve from the pump but the decrease in the efficiency, safety and functionality are self evident.
It is also possible to make the featured embodiment slightly more complicated and possibly more user friendly by placing a spring loaded valve over the branch of the outlet that was left open to the atmosphere. This valve would be open to the atmosphere by default by a spring and closed by pressure from the thumb which would counteract the spring to hold a manufactured cap in place and possibly provide a more consistent seal than the thumb alone when trying to achieve an active state. This embodiment may provide an easier “first time” experience for the user. However, this feature will come with tradeoffs that take away from the safety and cost benefits achieved by the featured embodiment. The costs of this valve relative to the simple opening plugged by a users thumb are evident but not necessarily prohibitive. It is the safety elements that have been considered most concerning with this possible embodiment. Potential for failure of the valve to open when the user released pressure on the spring could result in an inability to abort detonation efficiently if at all. There are more subtle safety concerns for this possible change as well. During testing of prototypes a tendency for the users to familiarize themselves with the operation of the machine more effectively before attempting a detonation was noticed when they were presented with the featured embodiment as opposed to a version with the spring loaded valve.
Various embodiments of pneumatic trigger release can also be attained by combining elements of the prior art (U.S. Pat. No. 7,587,854 B2), namely the slave cylinder assembly, with the pneumatic pump outfitted with safety release described above. These versions will give effective trigger release but add to the time necessary for preparation and assembly by the user as well as safety risks to equipment during recoil and during transport if disassembly is neglected. The prior art could be upgraded with the pneumatic pump with safety release to allow the requirement for hydraulic oil to be removed. Removal or loss of the hydraulic oil in an attempt to achieve pneumatic operation of the prior art was inconsistent at best because the size requirements of a device capable of connecting to the side of the rifle in the rest restricts the diameter of the piston to be used. Cost requirements also restrict the efficiency of a piston that can be air tight and low friction simultaneously. Therefore, since the fluid pressure acts, in an effective manner, only on the diameter of the piston and the use of air as opposed to hydraulic fluid allows substantial compression of the internal fluid before sufficient pressure can be built to move the cost effective piston, multiple failures resulted and a substantially reduced sensitivity is felt unless much expense is devoted to the quality of pistons used to manufacture these devices. The attempt for pneumatic operation with the master and slave cylinder outlined in the prior art resulted in a “sticky” feel and inconsistent level of force necessary on the plunger to achieve detonation. In order to compensate the device will require a larger ratio of master cylinder to slave cylinder volume which results in a decrease in sensitivity or “feel.” Using the pneumatic pump instead of the master cylinder allows for an open system with access to extra fluid to address the compressible nature of the air during use and will also provide an instant removal of pressure differential that could be combined with a spring to remove the “finger” from contact with the trigger when the pump is disengaged. However, as assembly to the firearm is required, the above mentioned negative considerations reappear. The ultra-simplified version of this embodiment that could eliminate the need for assembly and also provide automatic disengagement of the firearm would be a very small piston that fits between trigger and guard that simply supports itself when opened sufficiently, actuates trigger when pressurized, and falls out when the user disengages the pump. The size requirements for that particular embodiment would again restrict the diameter of the piston that is usable for the application and reduce the “feel” and sensitivity experienced by the shooter. The longevity, durability and cost effectiveness of a piston of that size were not tested but the ability to find a suitable balance of just those qualities is questionable. These factors are all present, although to a lesser degree, when using a piston to open the featured embodiment's hinged apparatus rather than the expandable bladder. A piston instead of an expandable bladder for substitution in the featured embodiment should be mentioned as a possibility.
Use of the above described pneumatic pump with safety release can improve the flexibility of the prior art by activating the piston with suction and thus contraction rather than expansion of the slave cylinder or piston. The check valves (one-way valves) on the inlet and outlet of the bulb can be reversed to allow suction by the pump and therefore actuate this embodiment by evacuation of fluid from a piston as opposed to the positive pressure differential suggested in the prior art. This feature allows for the prior art to pull as well as push and thus be more flexible on the location where an embodiment can attach to a firearm resulting in an increase of the spectrum of firearms serviced. Embodiments consisting of the slave cylinder outlined by the prior art can thus be outfitted to attach to the firearm at locations behind the trigger on the butt stock as opposed to being limited to clamping to the forearm only.
The use of the hinged apparatus outlined in the featured embodiment outlined in the figures above allows for abolishing the need for assembly to the firearm to achieve remote trigger release. The time necessary for assembling the prior art to the various firearms taken to the rifle range by a user is prohibitive by comparison. Also, during recoil, the prior art is known to become detached from the firearm on occasion thus requiring additional time for reassembly when additional detonations are desired. This feature alone will prove to separate this invention from the prior art in the opinion of the market.
The absence of liquid hydraulic fluid requirement and the increased “feel” and flexibility provided by a pneumatic pump with safety valve during use clearly provide the possibility of a plethora of embodiments that can be considered a separate and original invention as compared to the specific master and slave cylinders described in the claims of U.S. Pat. No. 7,587,854 B2. Additionally, when considering the layout of a firearm supported by a gun rest, the use of an expandable bladder or vessel allows the surface area of force exertion to be larger thus obtaining more efficient and sensitive mechanical force to the trigger. This more efficient harnessing of the necessary energy to complete a safe and consistent trigger release allows us to focus the effects of a device to a small and localized area of the firearm without the need for a clamping assembly thus eliminating time expenditures as well as risks of damage during recoil.
Patent application Ser. No. 16/165,805 filed Oct. 19, 2018 Provisional Patent Application No. 62/576,196 filed Oct. 24, 2017 Prior art of significant relevance: U.S. Pat. No. 7,587,854 B2
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
348868 | Straube | Sep 1886 | A |
3828458 | Skone-Palmer | Aug 1974 | A |
5667524 | Bourgeois, Jr. | Sep 1997 | A |
5761954 | Dvorak | Jun 1998 | A |
6336283 | Ortiz | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6860054 | Mosher | Mar 2005 | B1 |
8522470 | Mangum | Sep 2013 | B2 |
20070256346 | Potterfield | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20090158922 | Werner | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20130298439 | Mahnke, III | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20160047617 | DeGidio | Feb 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190186856 A1 | Jun 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62576196 | Oct 2017 | US |