This application is a national stage of, and claims priority to, Patent Cooperation Treaty Application No. PCT/EP2017/000037, filed on Jan. 13, 2017, which application claims priority to German Application No. DE 10 2016 000 356.1, filed on Jan. 14, 2016, which applications are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
The disclosure concerns a perforated plate (e.g. cover) for an application device (e.g. applicator) for application of a fluid to a component, in particular a motor vehicle body and/or an attachment for this. The disclosure furthermore concerns an application device and an application method in which such a perforated plate is used.
DE 10 2013 002 413 A1 discloses a perforated plate for an applicator for application of a coating medium in particular without overspray. The perforated plate here comprises several through-holes for application of the coating medium, wherein the through-holes are arranged in several nozzle rows in a matrix pattern and hence in a two-dimensional configuration. In this way, sharp-edged coating medium tracks can be produced. The disadvantage however is that the sharp-edged coating tracks are unsuitable for overlapping since they have an at least approximately rectangular cross-sectional profile.
DE 10 2010 019 612 A1 discloses an application device which provides a cross-sectional profile in the form of a trapezium, which is more suitable for overlapping of coating tracks. The trapezoid profile is produced by several through-holes for application of the coating medium, wherein the through-holes are arranged in several nozzle rows in a matrix pattern and hence in a two-dimensional configuration. Differently sized nozzle diameters, distributed regularly or superficially, serve in particular to achieve a better resolution with a superficial coating. The two-dimensional configuration with nozzle diameters of the same or different sizes, and the resulting trapezoid profile, firstly have a high complexity because of the plurality of through-holes. In addition, the two-dimensional configuration gives an undesirably high flow of coating medium, in particular when the coating medium is applied continuously as is usual when painting vehicle bodywork. The two-dimensional configuration also means that, on application of a coating track, coating medium from a nozzle row arranged downstream relative to the movement direction is applied on top of coating medium from a nozzle row arranged upstream in the movement direction, which disadvantageously can lead to coating medium splashes because coating medium is applied onto coating medium which has not yet dried or set sufficiently. U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,622,239 A and 5,769,946 A may also be cited as the general prior art.
The disclosure creates an improved and/or alternative perforated plate, in particular a perforated plate which allows an improved joint or overlap region of two fluid tracks and/or a fluid application which is at least substantially free from fluid splashes.
The disclosure provides a perforated plate (e.g. cover, strip, chip etc.) for an application device (e.g. an applicator) for application of a fluid to a component, in particular a motor vehicle body and/or an attachment for this.
The perforated plate and/or the application device serves in particular for application of the fluid without atomisation and/or masking.
The fluid may e.g. be a coating medium, in particular a paint, a sealant, a separating agent, a function layer or an adhesive.
The fluid preferably has a viscosity of more than 50 mPas, more than 80 mPas or even more than 100 mPas, in particular measured with a shear rate of 1000 s−1. The fluid may have a Newtonian or non-Newtonian flow behaviour.
The perforated plate preferably has at least three, at least four or at least five through-holes for the passage of the fluid. The through-holes are suitably arranged in a preferably substantially linearly oriented row of nozzles, wherein the row of nozzles has two edge regions and a central region, suitably extending between the two edge regions.
The perforated plate is distinguished in particular in that the at least one outermost through-hole in at least one edge region has at least one reference opening diameter that is smaller than at least one reference opening diameter of at least one through-hole in the central region, so that preferably a fluid application (e.g. fluid track) with a substantially trapezoid cross-sectional profile can be enabled, for example, a substantially right-angled, isosceles or non-isosceles trapezoid cross-sectional profile and/or a substantially Gaussian curve-shaped cross-sectional profile. In the context of the disclosure, it is possible that the at least two, at least three or even at least four outermost through-holes in at least one edge region suitably have uniform or non-uniform reference opening diameters that are smaller than at least one reference opening diameter of at least one through-hole in the central region.
The at least one outermost through-hole corresponds particularly to the first through-hole from the outside of the row of nozzles in the at least one edge region.
The at least two, at least three and/or at least four outermost through-holes correspond in particular to the two, three and/or four first through-holes from the outside of the row of nozzles in the at least one edge region.
In the context of the disclosure, in a particularly linearly oriented row of nozzles, a reference opening diameter of at least one through-hole in at least one of the two edge regions can be smaller than the reference opening diameters of the preferably plural through-holes in the central region between the two edge regions. It should also be mentioned, however, that in one example of the disclosure, the central region can also suitably have only one single through-hole.
The gradation and thus the suitable diameter reduction of the reference opening diameter can take place for just the outermost and thus, from the outside, the first through-hole in just one edge region or both edge regions.
However, the gradation and thus the suitable diameter reduction of the reference opening diameter can also take place over the at least two, at least three and/or at least four outermost and thus at least two, at least three and/or at least four, of the first through-holes from the outside in just one edge region or both edge regions.
With a diameter reduction in just one edge region, for example, a fluid application (e.g. fluid track) can be created with a substantially right-angled trapezium cross-sectional profile.
With a diameter reduction in both edge regions, for example, a fluid application (e.g. fluid track) can be created with a substantially isosceles or non-isosceles trapezium cross-sectional profile.
In particular, the disclosure allows an improved distribution of layer thickness in the joint or overlap region of two fluid applications (e.g. fluid tracks), which leads to visually uniform fluid surfaces (e.g. coating surfaces), suitably without fluctuations in layer thickness which would disadvantageously be perceptible to the human eye. Alternatively or additionally, the disclosure allows in particular that, by application of the fluid from preferably just a single nozzle row and hence in a one-dimensional nozzle configuration, application splashes are reduced or fully avoided because the nozzle row applies the fluid directly to the component, in some cases with the exception of a possible joint or overlap region of two fluid applications, wherein in the joint or overlap region the previously applied fluid has however usually already dried or hardened sufficiently and hence no longer has a tendency—or at least has only a greatly reduced tendency—to form fluid splashes.
By means of the perforated plate according to the disclosure, a spacing tolerance between two suitably sharp-edged fluid applications (e.g. fluid tracks) can be achieved of up to +/−150 μm, +/−200 μm, +/−500 μm, +/−1 mm or even +/−2 mm.
It is possible that the perforated plate has only a single nozzle row for application of the fluid, so that a one-dimensional nozzle configuration is possible.
The row of nozzles may include the central region and at least one edge region can be aligned e.g. linearly along an alignment line (suitably a straight alignment line) linearly.
It is even possible that all the through-holes of the row of nozzles are aligned, for example, linearly along the alignment line.
All the through-holes of the row of nozzles may be aligned linearly along one and the same alignment line.
The alignment line can extend, for example, through at least one reference opening diameter and/or hole outlet diameter of the at least one outermost through-hole or the at least two outermost through-holes in at least one edge region and at least one reference through opening diameter and/or hole outlet diameter of at least one through-hole in the central region, so that preferably a, for example, one-sided off-centre nozzle row alignment comes about between the at least one edge region and the central region. In an example of the disclosure, the alignment line can even extend through all the reference opening diameters and/or hole outlet diameters of the row of nozzles.
The alignment line can herein therefore correspond to a tangent to the reference opening diameters and/or the hole outlet diameters, in relation to all the through-holes of the row of nozzles.
The nozzle row arrangement can either be aligned as e.g. “top aligned”, “bottom aligned” or “vertically centred”.
The alignment line may also extend, for example, through at least one central axis of the at least one outermost through-hole or the at least two outermost through-holes in at least one edge region and at least one central axis of at least one through-hole in the central region, so that a central nozzle row alignment comes about between the at least one edge region and the central region. In a preferred example of the disclosure, the alignment line can even extend through all the central axes of the row of nozzles.
It is possible that at least one central axis of the outermost through-hole or of the at least two outermost through-holes in at least one edge region is arranged closer to the alignment line than at least one central axis of at least one through-hole in the central region. Alternatively or additionally, e.g. at least one central axis of the outermost through-hole or of the at least two outermost through-holes in at least one edge region and at least one central axis of at least one through-hole in the central region can be aligned substantially on the alignment line.
It is possible that the at least two, at least three or/or at least four outermost through-holes in at least one edge region have reference opening diameters that are smaller than at least one reference opening diameter of at least one through-hole in the central region.
The reference opening diameters of the through-holes in the at least one edge region can preferably be configured uniform (e.g. substantially equal-sized) or non-uniform (e.g. differently sized) in relation to one another.
The at least one outermost through-hole in at least one edge region can preferably have the smallest reference opening diameter of the row of nozzles. In the context of the disclosure, it is hereby possible, in particular, that the outermost through-hole has the absolute smallest reference opening diameter of the row of nozzles or at least a further through-hole of the row of nozzles has a (e.g. substantially equal-sized) reference opening diameter that is uniform therewith, provided suitably that none has a smaller reference opening diameter.
It is possible that the at least two outermost through-holes in at least one edge region have a uniform (e.g. substantially equal-sized) or different sized reference opening diameter.
In an example of the disclosure, the at least two outermost through-holes can have a different reference opening diameter in at least one edge region, wherein the reference opening diameter of the outermost through-hole can be the smaller reference opening diameter.
The central region can preferably have at least two, at least three or at least four through-holes. Alternatively or additionally, at least one edge region can have at least two, at least three or at least four through-holes.
It is possible that a plurality, preferably all, of the through-holes in the central region have a uniform (suitably substantially equal-sized) reference opening diameter, the central axes of a plurality, preferably all the through-holes in the central region are aligned linearly to one another, and/or a plurality, preferably all, of the through-holes are spaced equally from one another in the central region.
In an example of the disclosure, all the through-holes in the central region have a uniform (suitably substantially equal-sized) reference opening diameter and/or are spaced substantially equally from one another.
It is possible that at least two hole spacings between at least three through-holes in the central region are configured uniformly (suitably substantially equal-sized).
In an example of the disclosure, the row of nozzles can be configured overall with uniform (suitably substantially equal-sized) hole spacings between the through-holes.
It is possible that the outermost hole spacing or the at least two outermost hole spacings in at least one edge region correspond to the at least one hole spacing in the central region and thus are preferably configured substantially equal-sized.
It is also possible that the outermost hole spacing or the at least two outermost hole spacings in at least one edge region are smaller or larger than the at least one hole spacing in the central region.
It is also possible that the outermost hole spacing or the at least two outermost hole spacings in one edge region of the row of nozzles is configured uniform (suitably substantially equal-sized) or non-uniform (suitably differently sized) relative to the outermost hole spacing or the at least two outermost hole spacings in the other edge region.
The through-hole configurations in the two edge regions can correspond to one another (e.g. substantially identical and/or axially symmetrical, e.g. to the centre of the row of nozzles) or can be configured differently. The through-hole configurations herein preferably comprise the formation of the through-holes, the reference opening diameter and/or the hole spacings.
The reference opening diameters can be, in particular, hole outlet diameters.
It is possible that at least one through-hole in the central region of the row of nozzles and/or at least one through-hole in at least one edge region of the row of nozzles has a hopper-shaped hole inlet opening and preferably a cylindrical hole outlet opening. The hopper-shaped hole inlet opening preferably narrows in the flow direction of the fluid.
The hopper-shaped hole inlet opening of the at least one through-hole in the central region can, for example, extend deeper into the perforated plate than the hopper-shaped hole inlet opening of the at least one through-hole in the at least one edge region. Alternatively or additionally, an inlet cross-section (e.g. of the inlet-side passage cross-section) of a hole inlet opening of at least one through-hole in the central region of the row of nozzles can be larger than an inlet cross-section (e.g. of the inlet-side passage cross-section) of a hole inlet opening of at least one through-hole in at least one edge region of the row of nozzles.
The row of nozzles can be configured, in particular, to form a fluid application (e.g. a fluid track), with a substantially trapezoid cross-sectional profile, e.g. a substantially right-angled, isosceles or non-isosceles trapezoid cross-sectional profile and/or a cross-sectional profile with substantially Gaussian curve shape, so that the row of nozzles is suitable, in particular, for generating fluid tracks, which are optimised for overlap.
It is possible that at least one through-hole has, over its length, a constant, in particular unchanging, passage cross-section. The reference opening diameter then preferably relates to the one suitably constant opening diameter of the unchanging passage cross-section. This is the case, for example, if the through-hole is configured, for example, cylindrical, in particular circular cylinder-shaped. It is alternatively or additionally possible that at least one through-hole has, over its length, a changing passage cross-section. The reference opening diameter then preferably relates to the smallest opening diameter of the changing passage cross-section. This is the case, for example, if the through-hole is configured, for example, cylindrical, in particular circular cylinder-shaped, but the hole outlet opening has a larger passage cross-section than the hole inlet opening or vice versa or the through-hole is configured, for example, substantially Laval nozzle-shaped.
The reference opening diameters therefore preferably relate to an at least substantially constant opening diameter and/or to the smallest opening diameter of the associated through-hole, preferably a hole outlet opening diameter.
In one example, the hole inlet opening has a larger passage cross-section than the hole outlet opening. The hole inlet opening can be configured, for example, hopper-shaped.
It is possible that the two edge regions are formed symmetrically or asymmetrically or that the row of nozzles is configured symmetrically overall, in particular, axially symmetrically and/or mirror symmetrically relative to a symmetry axis extending transversely to the row of nozzles.
The at least one outermost through-hole in one edge region can have, for example, at least a reference opening diameter that is smaller than at least one reference opening diameter of at least one through-hole in the central region, wherein the at least one outermost through-hole in the other edge region can have at least a reference opening diameter which is configured uniform (e.g. substantially equal-sized) relative to at least a reference opening diameter of at least one through-hole in the central region.
The disclosure is not restricted to a perforated plate, but also comprises an application device, e.g. an applicator, for applying a fluid, wherein the application device has at least one perforated plate as disclosed herein.
It is possible that the application device is configured to ensure a fluid inflow with equal pressure over the entire row of nozzles and thus over suitably all the through-holes, so that preferably by means of the through-hole or holes with a smaller reference opening diameter, as a result of the pressure loss, there flows a smaller fluid volume flow.
It is also possible that the application device is configured to guarantee a fluid inflow in the at least one edge region which can be controlled (e.g. regulated) independently of the central region.
The two edge regions may e.g. be supplied with fluid by the same fluid delivery unit or each have their own fluid delivery unit, so that in particular each edge region can be supplied with fluid via a separately controllable (e.g. regulatable) fluid delivery unit.
The application device serves preferably for application of a fluid with a viscosity of over 50 mPas, over 80 mPas or over 100 mPas, in particular at a shear rate of 1000 s−1. The fluid may have a Newtonian or a non-Newtonian flow behaviour.
It is possible that the application device has at least two perforated plates arranged next to each other, the nozzle rows of which are preferably arranged offset to each other in the longitudinal direction of the nozzle rows.
The at least one perforated plate may in particular be arranged at (e.g. on or in) an outer end face of the application device, and thus preferably constitute an outer plate. The at least three through-holes consequently preferably form outlet holes from the application device.
The disclosure furthermore comprises an application method for application of a fluid by means of at least one application device and/or at least one perforated plate as disclosed herein.
In particular, it is possible that the fluid is applied from one single nozzle row of the perforated plate.
It should be mentioned that the fluid is preferably a coating medium, e.g. a paint, a sealant, a separating agent, an adhesive etc., and/or may serve to form a function layer.
The category of function layer includes in particular layers which lead to a surface functionalisation, such as e.g. adhesion-promoting agents, primers or layers to reduce transmission.
In the context of the disclosure, it is possible to supplement the perforated plate as described herein with features from WO 2014/121926 A1, in particular its claims, so that the full content of this patent application is to be included to the present disclosure.
The perforated plate according to the disclosure may in particular have hole inlet openings on the upstream side of the perforated plate and hole outlet openings on the downstream side of the perforated plate, and e.g. three-dimensional structurings on the upstream side of the perforated plate and/or on the downstream side of the perforated plate.
It is possible that the hole inlet openings are fluidically optimised, in particular nozzle-shaped, and/or that the hole inlet openings have a larger (passage) cross-section than the hole outlet openings.
It is possible that pipe stubs serve as structurings, which protrude from the downstream side of the perforated plate and into which the through-holes transform, in order in particular to reduce the wetting surface area at the hole outlet openings.
The pipe stubs may e.g. have an outer casing surface which tapers, in particular conically, towards the free end of the respective pipe stub.
The perforated plate may e.g. have a greater thickness at the edge than in a central region with the through-holes.
It is possible that preferably all through-holes in the perforated plate are produced at least partially by an etching production method, in particular dry etching or wet etching.
The perforated plate may in particular consist at least partially of a semiconductor material, e.g. one of the following materials: silicon, silicon dioxide, silicon carbide, gallium, gallium arsenide and/or indium phosphide.
It should be mentioned that, in the context of the disclosure, the feature of a substantially trapezoid cross-sectional profile may preferably comprise also e.g. a cross-sectional profile with substantially Gaussian curve shape.
The examples described with reference to the figures partially correlate, so that similar or identical parts are identified with the same reference signs and for their explanation, reference is also made, for the avoidance of repetition, to the description of one or more other examples.
The perforated plate 1 comprises a central region 2 with a plurality of through-holes 2.1 of which for the sake of clarity, only three are provided with the reference sign 2.1. The perforated plate 1 also comprises a first left edge region 3a in
The through-holes 2.1, 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 each have a passage cross-section that is preferably unchanging, e.g. substantially cylindrical, over their length, so that their opening diameters are suitably substantially constant.
The two outermost through-holes 3.1 and 3.2 and therefore the two first through-holes 3.1 and 3.2 from the outside in the first edge region 3a have a reference opening diameter that is smaller than the reference opening diameter of the through-holes 2.1 in the central region 2.
The perforated plate 1 comprises only one single row of nozzles, wherein the row of nozzles is aligned linearly along a straight alignment line 4.
In the perforated plate 1 shown in
The through-holes 2.1 in the central region 2 all have the same reference opening diameter and are equally spaced from one another.
In the example shown in
With the perforated plate 1 shown in
The hole spacings of the row of nozzles are substantially equal-sized with the exception of the outermost hole spacing between the through-holes 3.1 and 3.2, which is smaller than the remaining hole spacings of the row of nozzles.
The outer periphery of the row of nozzles can be delimited by a substantially right-angled trapezium 5. The row of nozzles thus generates a fluid track with a substantially right-angled trapezium cross-sectional profile.
The double arrow F indicates the two possible movement directions of the perforated plate 1 relative to the component.
With the perforated plate 1 shown in
The first edge region 3a and the second edge region 3b have a uniform, in particular axially symmetrical nozzle hole configuration.
With the example shown in
With the perforated plate 1 shown in
In the case of the perforated plate 1 shown in
In the context of the disclosure, the reference opening diameters can be specified as follows:
The perforated plate 1 of
In the context of the disclosure, the hole spacings can be specified, for example, as follows:
1.
In principle, it is the case that the hole spacings in the two edge regions 3a and 3b can correspond to one another, e.g. a1 equal to a5 and a2 equal to a4, but can also be configured differently.
The cross-sections of the coating medium tracks B1 and B2 have a substantially isosceles trapezium form 6 and overlap in a joint or overlap region. The spacing tolerance between the two fluid tracks B1 and B2 can be in the range from +/−150 μm, +/−200 μm, +/−500 μm, +/−1 mm or even +/−2 mm. The trapezium form 6 leads to an optimum coating, as shown at right in
The perforated plate 1 according to
However, the application device can also be configured to enable a fluid inflow to the at least one edge region 3 that is controllable (e.g. regulable) independently of the central region 2.
The two edge regions 3a and 3b can be supplied with fluid e.g. by means of the same fluid delivery unit or each by its own fluid delivery unit.
In addition, the perforated plate 1 has a structuring on the downstream side, on the peripheral edge of each through-hole, which reduces the wetting tendency.
It is evident from this that the coating medium 50 wets a wetting surface 60 on the downstream surface of the perforated plate 1, which impedes a jet-shaped release of the coating medium 50 from the perforated plate 1.
Between the downstream side of the perforated plate 1 and the free end of the pipe stub 70, the pipe stub 70 has for example a length L which is preferably greater than 50 μm, 70 μm, or 100 μm and/or less than 200 μm, 170 μm or 150 μm, so that the pipe stub 70 may have e.g. a length L of between 50 to 200 μm, 70 to 170 μm or 100 to 150 μm.
One particular feature of this exemplary example is that the perforated plate 1 has a relatively thick edge 90 on the outside, and a thinner region 100 with the through-holes in the middle. The thick edge 90 of the perforated plate 1 here ensures adequate mechanical stability, while the reduction in thickness in the region 100 with the through-holes ensures that the through-holes offer only a relatively low flow resistance.
A particular feature of this exemplary example is that the region 100 is here reduced in thickness on one side only.
The sharp edges and corners shown in the figures are depicted merely as examples and may advantageously also be rounded in order to configure them fluidically optimised or to achieve better rinsability.
A particular feature of the exemplary example of the through-hole shown in
Then, in the flow direction, the cylindrical region 200 is followed by a conical region 210 which tapers in the flow direction and has the reference opening diameter (inner diameter) d at the hole outlet opening.
It is important here that the reference opening diameter (inner diameter) d of the hole outlet opening is preferably substantially smaller than the first inner diameter of the cylindrical region 200.
Jets 170 of coating medium here emerge from the individual through-holes of the perforated plate 1 and form a cohesive film of coating medium on the surface of the component 160. The individual jets 170 of coating medium may be formed as droplet jets as shown in
Furthermore,
A peculiarity of the perforated plate 1 shown in
A peculiarity of the perforated plate 1 shown in
It should be mentioned that the rows of nozzles shown in
The through-holes shown in
It must also be mentioned that an application device according to an example of the disclosure may comprise at least two perforated plates 1 arranged next to each other, the nozzle rows of which are arranged offset to each other in the longitudinal direction of the nozzle rows. The perforated plates 1 here are arranged on an outer end face of the application device so they constitute outer plates.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2016 000 356.1 | Jan 2016 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2017/000037 | 1/13/2017 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2017/121643 | 7/20/2017 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3708798 | Hildenbrand et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
4508266 | Saito et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4622239 | Schoenthaler et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4792817 | Barney | Dec 1988 | A |
5571560 | Lin | Nov 1996 | A |
5602572 | Rylander | Feb 1997 | A |
5699491 | Barzel | Dec 1997 | A |
5769946 | Kutsuzawa et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769949 | Cienkus et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5818477 | Fullmer et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5820456 | Nelson | Oct 1998 | A |
6062056 | Groch | May 2000 | A |
6096132 | Kaiba et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6106107 | Sheinman | Aug 2000 | A |
6136449 | Furuuchi et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6247657 | Finney, Jr. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6264547 | Waelti | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6302523 | Smith | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6325490 | Yang | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331326 | Tsunoda et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6375319 | Kamano et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6428132 | Kubatzki et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6517187 | Dietl et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6592203 | Bates et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6764162 | Biddle et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
7182815 | Katagami et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7625065 | Kanda | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7857423 | Suzuki | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8567909 | Sieber | Oct 2013 | B2 |
9085151 | Iriguchi | Jul 2015 | B2 |
20020155069 | Pruche | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020166232 | Fujita et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020175962 | Otsuki | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030029379 | Onogawa et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030048314 | Renn | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030155451 | Hisashi et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030159651 | Sakurada | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030186613 | Kawase | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030202215 | Biddle et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040165021 | Desie | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050048897 | Tong | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050156960 | Courian et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050179724 | Salt et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050189442 | Hussaini | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060044376 | Baird et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060068109 | Frankenberger et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060103691 | Dietl et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060171250 | Frosztega et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060197723 | Sikora et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070034715 | Clifford | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070062383 | Gazeau et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070076069 | Edwards et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070097176 | Hickey et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070146399 | Yamamoto | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080047486 | Herre et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080236484 | Herre et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080252671 | Cannell et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080311836 | Bhattacharya | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090002441 | Yoshiro et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090057445 | Hung | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090284570 | Jung et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100047465 | Ansorge et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100051071 | Calhoun et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100079543 | Otokita | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100231644 | Otokita | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110052819 | Ebisawa | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110262622 | Herre et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20130222454 | Iriguchi | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20150211461 | Shirk | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150375241 | Wohr et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1176485 | Mar 1998 | CN |
1242262 | Jan 2000 | CN |
1651898 | Aug 2005 | CN |
1668386 | Sep 2005 | CN |
101711186 | May 2010 | CN |
102021753 | Apr 2011 | CN |
102294317 | Dec 2011 | CN |
103402726 | Nov 2013 | CN |
104040276 | Sep 2014 | CN |
104994963 | Oct 2015 | CN |
1887910 | Feb 1964 | DE |
3130096 | May 1982 | DE |
3140486 | May 1982 | DE |
3927880 | Jan 1991 | DE |
4204704 | Aug 1993 | DE |
4238378 | May 1994 | DE |
29614871 | Dec 1996 | DE |
19734485 | Feb 1998 | DE |
19731829 | Jan 1999 | DE |
19852079 | May 2000 | DE |
29724351 | Dec 2000 | DE |
102004044655 | Mar 2006 | DE |
102006005341 | Aug 2007 | DE |
60218929 | Dec 2007 | DE |
102006032804 | Jan 2008 | DE |
102006047382 | Apr 2008 | DE |
102006060398 | Jun 2008 | DE |
202011001109 | Mar 2011 | DE |
10 2010 019 612 | Nov 2011 | DE |
102011056823 | Jun 2013 | DE |
10 2013 002 413 | Aug 2014 | DE |
0026359 | Apr 1981 | EP |
0206452 | Dec 1986 | EP |
0538147 | Apr 1993 | EP |
0970811 | Jan 2000 | EP |
1065055 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1095707 | May 2001 | EP |
1253626 | Oct 2002 | EP |
1277579 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1449667 | Aug 2004 | EP |
1884365 | Feb 2008 | EP |
2208541 | Jul 2010 | EP |
2514267 | Apr 1983 | FR |
2862563 | May 2005 | FR |
2107614 | May 1983 | GB |
2177946 | Feb 1987 | GB |
S53-126930 | Nov 1978 | JP |
S5625465 | Mar 1981 | JP |
H03151073 | Jun 1991 | JP |
04063163 | Feb 1992 | JP |
H06121944 | May 1994 | JP |
H0679506 | Nov 1994 | JP |
H0737797 | Feb 1995 | JP |
H08274014 | Oct 1996 | JP |
H09075825 | Mar 1997 | JP |
0994527 | Apr 1997 | JP |
H09164706 | Jun 1997 | JP |
H10083982 | Mar 1998 | JP |
H10197967 | Jul 1998 | JP |
11076889 | Mar 1999 | JP |
2000033289 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2000135459 | May 2000 | JP |
2000238254 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2002096474 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2003103791 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003117460 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003144991 | May 2003 | JP |
2003165226 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2003-329828 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2004066081 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2005028227 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2005-088548 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2005254210 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2006-289239 | Oct 2006 | JP |
2007154431 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2008-246713 | Oct 2008 | JP |
201040323 | Feb 2010 | JP |
2010076362 | Apr 2010 | JP |
2011049002 | Mar 2011 | JP |
2011526832 | Oct 2011 | JP |
2011230410 | Nov 2011 | JP |
2013180437 | Sep 2013 | JP |
2014502920 | Feb 2014 | JP |
2015506412 | Mar 2015 | JP |
2016513003 | May 2016 | JP |
5976320 | Aug 2016 | JP |
2016175077 | Oct 2016 | JP |
6130950 | May 2017 | JP |
8808755 | Nov 1988 | WO |
9632282 | Oct 1996 | WO |
9828088 | Jul 1998 | WO |
0115812 | Mar 2001 | WO |
2007131636 | Nov 2007 | WO |
2008125967 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2008128019 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2010146473 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO-2014002770 | Jan 2014 | WO |
2014121926 | Aug 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
WO-2014002770-A1 translation (Year: 2014). |
Article: New Sprayers Make Car Body Painting More Economical, 2004; 4 pages (inlcuding abstract). |
International Search Report for PCT/EP2009/007448, dated Jan. 29, 2010. |
“Types of Residential Plumbing Systems”. Oct. 8, 1999. Web. Sep. 2, 2014; <<http://www.chilipperapp.com/ps.htm>>. |
Obst, Manfred “Lackierereien planen und optimieren”, Moderne Lackiertechnik, p. 41, 2002, ISBN: 3878707371. |
EPO Office Action dated Feb. 7, 2018 for Application No. EP16 001 687.9 (4 pages). |
SIPO Office Action dated Feb. 1, 2018 for Application No. CN20161044566.2 (7 pages; with English translation). |
SIPO Office Action dated Dec. 14, 2017 for Application No. 201610445627.7 (6 pages; with English translation). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/911,580 dated Jun. 28, 2019 (11 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2017/000038 dated Mar. 24, 2017 (16 pages; with English translations). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2017/000037 dated Apr. 21, 2017 (16 pages; with English translations). |
China National Intellectual Property Administration Search Report for CN 201780013200.2 dated Mar. 30, 2020 (2 pages; English translation only). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/069,907 dated Aug. 28, 2020 (57 pages). |
Kyle Puccie; “What Causes Wetting?”; Aug. 3, 2018; Internet Article from Imageexpert.com; 5 pages (year: 2018). |
USPTO Final Office Action dated Feb. 9, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/069,907 (11 pages). |
Notification of Reasons for Rejection from the Japanese Patent Office for JP2018536725 dated Sep. 15, 2020 (8 pages). |
Notification of Reasons for Rejection from the Japanese Patent Office for JP2018536731 dated Sep. 15, 2020 (9 pages). |
EPO Office Action for EP 17700769.7-1010 dated Nov. 19, 2019 (3 pages). |
Chinese Office Action for Application No. CN201780013202.1 dated Mar. 30, 2020 (8 pages). |
European Examination Report for EP17700769.7 dated Jul. 22, 2020 (3 pages; English translation not available). |
CIPO Office Action dated Jul. 23, 2021 for Application No. CN201780013200.2 (17 pages; with English translation). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190022689 A1 | Jan 2019 | US |