Devices, systems, and methods for perforating, among other things, wellbore structures and oil and gas deposit formations are generally disclosed. More specifically, devices, systems, and methods for creating constant open areas to flow in a target and for adapting a geometry of a perforating jet and resulting perforation are disclosed.
Perforating gun assemblies are used in many oilfield and gas well completions. The perforating gun assemblies are usually cylindrical and include a detonating cord arranged within the interior of the assembly and connected to shaped charges, hollow charges or perforators disposed therein. Shaped charges are explosive components configured to focus ballistic energy onto a target. When the detonating cord initiates the explosive load within the shaped charge, a liner and/or other materials within the shaped charge are collapsed and propelled out of the shaped charge in a perforating jet of thermal energy and solid material. In particular, the shaped charges may be used for, among other things, any or all of generating holes in downhole pipe/tubing (such as a steel casing) to gain access to an oil/gas deposit formation and to create flow paths for fluids used to clean and/or seal off a well and perforating the oil/gas deposit formation to liberate the oil/gas from the formation. The shaped charges may be designed such that the physical force, heat, and/or pressure of the perforating jet, expelled materials, and shaped charge explosion will perforate or form entrance openings/holes in the target, which may include, among other things, steel, concrete, and geological formations. The diameters of the entrance openings typically depend on, at least in part, the centralization or the decentralization of the perforating gun in the wellbore, the shaped charges and the constituents and shape of the liner housed within each shaped charge, among other things. While initial design parameters may target specific diameters for the entrance openings, the aforementioned factors may result in variation/variation of the diameters. Such variations can lead to challenges in, for example, fracturing processes, which include the injection of fluid into the underground formation to force open cracks or fissures in the formation. The diameter of the entrance openings may negatively impact the distribution of fluid during the fracturing process by, for example, deviating from the target diameters due to decentralization of the perforating gun in the wellbore. Variations in the entrance hole diameters may also result in an unpredictable pressure drop, which may negatively impact the fracturing process.
Shaped charges for perforating guns used in wellbore operations come in many shapes/geometries. For example, shaped charges typically may be hemispherical, conical, frustoconical, or rectangular. The shape of the shaped charge in part determines the geometry of the perforating jet and/or perforation (hole) that is produced by the charge upon detonation. Hemispherical, conical, and frustoconical shaped charges (collectively, conical shaped charges or rotational symmetric shaped charges) tend to produce round/(semi-)circular perforations, while rectangular, or “slotted”, shaped charges tend to produce rectangular and/or linear perforations (“slots”). Particular geometries may be useful for specific applications in wellbore operations. For example, conical charges may produce a concentrated perforating jet that penetrates deep into a geological formation, to enhance access to oil/gas formations. Slotted shaped charges may produce linear perforations that can overlap each other in a helical pattern, and thereby perforate a cylindrical target around all 360° of the target. Such a pattern may be useful during abandonment of a well, where concrete is pumped into the well and must reach and seal substantially all areas of the wellbore.
One disadvantage of typical shaped charges is that they may generate perforations having varied entrance hole diameters or open entrance areas, varied perforating tunnel lengths and/or varied perforating tunnel shapes. For example, the sizes of each entrance opening may vary at least in part by one or more wellbore conditions, including one or more of the position of the perforating gun in the casing, the thickness or composition of the casing, the position of the shaped charge in the perforating gun, the type of hydrocarbon formation in which the perforating gun is disposed and the local stress field. Current systems and methods to accommodate for these variations include the use of big hole shaped charges (i.e., shaped charges having modified liners that facilitate the creation of large perforation holes in a target). One disadvantage of such big hole shaped charges is that they can lead to unreliable and unpredictable entrance hole sizes (e.g., entrance hole diameters (EHD)) and poor penetration in the target. Other systems and methods, such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,725,993, include the use of shaped charges having liners with subtended angles to minimize variation of the EHD of perforations. One disadvantage of such systems and methods is that a subtended angle for the liner does not necessarily, by itself, achieve constant EHD because there are a variety of design specifications for a shaped charge that determine the jet, and therefore the perforation properties.
Yet another disadvantage of typical shaped charges is that the geometry of the shaped charge and associated perforating jet is set when the shaped charge is manufactured according to corresponding specifications. As such, a particularly-styled shaped charge must be kept on hand for each respective application in which a particular shaped charge is used. The limited, particularized use of different shaped charges thereby increases the costs and efforts associated with, e.g., manufacturing smaller batches of shaped charges, holding inventory of specific shaped charges, and transporting and keeping various styles of shaped charges at a job site.
Based at least on the above considerations, there is a need for a liner and shaped charged design that creates an entrance hole having a geometry that increases fluid flow and reduces the breakdown pressure. Further, there is a need for a liner and a shaped charge design that creates an entrance hole having a diameter that is unaffected by design and environmental factors. These and other benefits are further served by devices, systems, and associated methods that are economical, adaptable to a variety of shaped charges and applications, and simple to execute.
Some exemplary embodiments described herein relate to a shaped charge inlay for use with a liner in a shaped charge. The shaped charge inlay is secured to the liner, and includes an upper edge, and a distal edge opposite the upper edge. The upper edge may extend inwardly from an edge of a shaped charge case associated with a shaped charge. The shaped charge inlay further includes a body that extends between the upper and distal edges, and toward an apex of the liner. According to an aspect, at least a portion of the shaped charge inlay covers a portion of the liner that is away from the apex of the liner. The shaped charge inlay is disposed above the liner in the shaped charge in a manner that disrupts the collapse of the liner upon detonation of the shaped charge, thereby changing the geometry of a perforating jet and/or perforation created by the shaped charge. The shaped charge inlay adapts shaped charges so that the shaped charge can be used to create atypical perforation hole geometries, regardless of the shape of the case of the shaped charge. The atypical hole geometries are different than the standard perforating hole geometry that would be formed in the absence of the shaped charge inlay.
The present disclosure further describes a shaped charge inlay including an upper edge, a continuous ring formed at the upper edge, and a plurality of fingers extending from the continuous ring. The fingers are arranged in a manner that forms an open apex opposite the continuous ring. The shaped charge inlay is particularly suited for use with a liner in a shaped charge and is configured to transform a perforating jet to create atypical perforating hole geometries. According to an aspect, the atypical perforation hole geometries are based in part on the quantity/number of the fingers.
According to an aspect, the shaped charge inlays described hereinabove are particularly suited for use in shaped charges. Such shaped charges include a case having a hollow interior, an explosive load disposed within the hollow interior, and a liner disposed adjacent the explosive load. A shaped charge inlay, substantially as described hereinabove, is disposed adjacent the liner so that upon detonation of the shaped charge, an atypical perforation hole is formed.
The present embodiments also relate to a method of changing a perforating jet geometry of a shaped charge. The method includes securing a shaped charge inlay in a shaped charge. The inlay and the shaped charge may be substantially as described hereinabove. The shaped charge inlay may be coupled or otherwise secured to the shaped charge. The method further includes detonating the shaped charge to form a perforating jet that produces an atypical perforation hole geometry in a target or formation.
Embodiments of the disclosure are associated with shaped charges, for use with perforating guns, that create constant open areas to flow in a target. As used herein, constant open areas correspond to constant entry hole diameters (EHD), but particularly refers to the entry openings for non-circumferential geometries. The shaped charges each include a shaped charge case comprising a hollow interior, an explosive load disposed within the hollow interior, and a liner disposed adjacent the explosive load. A shaped charge inlay may be disposed on top of at least a portion of the liner. Upon detonation, each shaped charge forms a perforating jet that each creates an atypical perforation hole geometry in a target. The created atypical perforation hole geometries include constant open areas to flow in the target. The constant open areas to flow are created when the perforating gun is centralized or even decentralized in a wellbore casing and have a variation (or deviation) of less than 10%.
Embodiments of the disclosure related to methods of perforating a wellbore. The method includes positioning a perforating gun including a plurality of shaped charges in an underground formation and detonating the shaped charges to create/form slot-shaped perforation hole geometries in a target of the underground formation. The slot-shaped perforation hole geometries created include constant open areas to flow in the target with a variation of less than 10%. The method further includes injecting a fluid into the wellbore to fracture the underground formation. Since the detonation of the shaped charges creates an optimal elongated opening in the form of the slot-shaped perforation hole geometries in the target, this reduces erosion of the perforation hole. An increased amount of fluid may flow through the slot-shaped perforation hole, as compared to round holes. In addition, the slot-shaped perforation hole geometry may reduce the breakdown pressure required for fracking operations. This may be even further reduced if the slot shape is aligned with the frac plane.
Further embodiments of the disclosure are associated with a method of creating slot-shaped perforations in a wellbore in an underground formation. The method includes positioning a perforating gun including a plurality of conical shaped charges in the wellbore, and detonating the conical shaped charges into the underground formation. The conical shaped charges each include a shaped charge case comprising a hollow interior, a liner disposed adjacent the explosive load, and a shaped charge inlay disposed on top of a portion of the liner. According to an aspect, at least a portion of the liner is between the inlay and the explosive load. Upon detonation, each shaped charge and corresponding inlay forms a perforating jet that creates a slot-shaped perforation hole geometry in the underground formation. The slot-shaped perforation hole geometries formed by the plurality of conical shaped charges include constant open areas to flow, having a variation that is less than 10%. This allows all of the slot-shaped perforation holes to facilitate fluid flow and contribute to the fracturing process.
In various exemplary embodiments, the disclosed devices, systems, and methods may result in perforation geometries that are, e.g., rectangularly-shaped, triangularly-shaped, cross-shaped, star-shaped, and the like.
A more particular description will be rendered by reference to specific embodiments thereof that are illustrated in the appended drawings. Understanding that these drawings depict only typical embodiments thereof and are not therefore to be considered to be limiting of its scope, exemplary embodiments will be described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings in which:
Various features, aspects, and advantages of the embodiments will become more apparent from the following detailed description, along with the accompanying figures in which like numerals represent like components throughout the figures and text. The various described features are not necessarily drawn to scale but are drawn to emphasize specific features relevant to some embodiments.
The headings used herein are for organizational purposes only and are not meant to limit the scope of the description or the claims. To facilitate understanding, reference numerals have been used, where possible, to designate like elements common to the figures.
Reference will now be made in detail to various embodiments. Each example is provided by way of explanation and is not meant as a limitation and does not constitute a definition of all possible embodiments.
For purposes of this disclosure, the phrases “device(s)”, “system(s)”, and “method(s)” may be used either individually or in any combination referring without limitation to disclosed components, grouping, arrangements, steps, functions, or processes.
The exemplary embodiments relate generally to a shaped charge inlay that is coupled to an existing liner of a shaped charge, to change a particular geometry of a perforating jet and/or perforation produced by the shaped charge. For example, the shaped charge inlay may be coupled to the existing liner of a conical shaped charge so that detonation of the conical shaped charge causes a rectangularly-shaped perforation and/or linear slots instead of a round/circular perforation. The shaped charge inlays described herein may change a shape of the perforation produced by the perforating jet and may not necessarily affect a size of the perforation hole.
For purposes of illustrating features of the embodiments, a simple example will now be introduced and referenced throughout the disclosure. This example is illustrative and not limiting and is provided purely for explanatory purposes.
With reference to
The shaped charge 100 includes a shaped charge inlay 110, in accordance with an embodiment. The shaped charge inlay 110 may be formed from a rigid material or semi-rigid material such as a plastic material or polymer such as polyamide, a metal, a combination of such materials, or other materials consistent with this disclosure. The shaped charge inlay 110 may be formed from a rubber material. According to an aspect, the shaped charge inlay 110 includes an upper edge 135 and a distal edge 160 opposite the upper edge 135. The inlay 110 may further include a body 125 that extends between the upper edge 135 and the distal edge 160. The body 125 may include a triangular shape, as defined by the upper edge 135 and the distal edge 160 of the inlay 110. According to an aspect, the shaped charge inlay 110 is attached or otherwise secured to the existing liner 120 and/or the shaped charge casing 140 by a number of techniques, as described hereinabove.
As illustrated in the exemplary embodiment of
During detonation of the shaped charge 100, the shaped charge inlay 110 may disrupt/disturb the collapse of the existing liner 120 (described in further detail hereinbelow) in at least one direction. Such a disruption may lead to the creation of, e.g., a slot-shaped perforation 1210 (see
As illustrated in
A liner 120 is disposed atop the explosive load 1140, so that the explosive load 1140 is encased within the hollow interior 1121. The liner 120 may include any shaped, such as, a conical shape, a tulip shape, a bell shape, and the like. The liner 120 may be formed from a variety of various powdered metallic and non-metallic materials and/or powdered metal alloys, and binders. According to an aspect, the liner 120 is formed from copper, pressed to form the desired liner shape. In certain exemplary embodiments, the liner material(s) may include an inert material, where an inert material may be a material that does not participate in a chemical reaction, including an exothermic chemical reaction, with the liner 120 and/or other components of the shaped charge including elements created as a result of a detonation of the shaped charge. In the same or other embodiments, the liner material may include an energetic material, where an energetic material may be a material that is capable of a chemical reaction, including an exothermic chemical reaction, with one or more components of the liner 120, the inlay 110 and/or other components of the shaped charge including elements created as a result of a detonation of the shaped charge.
The shaped charge inlay 110 is disposed above the liner 120. In an embodiment, the shaped charge inlay 110 is affixed to at least a portion of the liner 120. According to an aspect, and as illustrated in
According to an aspect, a detonating device 1160, such as a detonating cord, may be in contact or communication with the explosive load 1140 through an initiation point 1150 formed in the back wall 1124, to initiate detonation of the shaped charge 100. According to an aspect, the initiation point 1150 may be an aperture (
Now referring to
According to an aspect, the shaped charge inlay 210 is composed of a rigid or semi-rigid material. Such materials may be inert and may include plastics, rubbers or metals. The shaped charge inlay 210 may include an upper edge 235 and a ring/continuous ring 215 formed at the upper edge 235. According to an aspect, the case 240 of the shaped charge includes an edge 245, and the continuous ring 215 or the upper edge 235 of the inlay 210 may extend inwardly from the edge 245 of the case 240 (see,
A plurality of fingers/protrusions/segments/spikes/bodies 225 may extend from the continuous ring 215 in a generally vertical direction. The plurality of
In the aforementioned exemplary embodiments and other embodiments, the number and shape of fingers on a shaped charge inlay define a shape or geometry of a perforating jet and/or perforation that is produced by the shaped charge including such an inlay upon detonation. The shape and quantity of the fingers 225 of the shaped charge inlay 210 may be based on a particular requirement of the application in which they are to be used, such as the desired shape and size of the atypical perforation hole geometry. The number of fingers 225 may include 3, 4, 5, 6, or more. In certain embodiments, multiple shaped charge inlays and/or fingers of a shaped charge inlay according to the disclosure may be equally spaced around a circumference of the shaped charge and existing liner. Each finger 225, for example, may alter/transform the perforating jet to create the atypical perforation hole geometry.
Embodiments of the disclosure further relate to a method 500 of changing a perforating jet geometry of a shaped charge. The method 500 includes using one or more shaped charge inlays 110/210 in conjunction with a shaped charge 100/200. As illustrated in the flow chart of
Embodiments of the disclosure are associated with a perforating gun 1500 (
The shaped charge case 140 includes a hollow interior 1121 and an explosive load 1140 disposed within the hollow interior 1121. According to an aspect, the explosive load 1140 extends from the back wall 1124 of the case 140 to the open front portion, at least partially filling the hollow interior 1121. The explosive load 1140 is retained in the hollow interior 1121 by a liner 120. As described hereinabove, the liner 120 is composed of a variety of powdered metallic and non-metallic materials and/or powdered metal alloys pressed to form a desired liner shape.
As described hereinabove, a shaped charge inlay 110, 210 may be disposed on top of a portion of the liner 120. In this configuration, at least a portion of the liner 120 is between the inlay 110, 210 and the explosive load (see, for example,
Each shaped charge 100, upon detonation, may form a perforating jet that creates an atypical perforation hole geometry in a target. The inlay 110, 210 defines a shape of the perforating jet to create the corresponding atypical perforation hole geometry. The atypical perforation hole geometries created by the shaped charges 100 include constant open areas to flow (AOF) (the open areas representing the perforations, such as those illustrated in
AOF=W×H
wherein AOF is the area open to flow, W is the average width of the slot-shaped perforation, and H is the average height of the slot-shaped perforation.
According to an aspect, the plurality of shaped charges 100 include a first shaped charge and a second shaped charge. The variation between the open area to flow of the perforation hole geometry of the first shaped charge and the open area to flow of the perforation hole geometry of the second shaped charge may be less than 20%. In an embodiment, upon detonation of the first shaped charge and the second shaped charge, the open areas to flow of the atypical perforation hole geometries formed by the first and second shaped charges has a variation that is less than 15%. According to an aspect, the plurality of shaped charges 100 includes more than two shaped charges, such as, six shaped charges. The variation between the open area to flow of the perforation hole geometries of the six shaped charges may be less than 10%, that is, the open areas to flow are constant open areas to flow. According to an aspect the variation may be less than 7%. The shaped charges 100, in combination with the inlays 110, 210, produce constant open areas to flow having variations of less than 10% when the gun is decentralized (
Embodiments of the disclosure are further associated with a method of perforating a wellbore using a perforating gun configured substantially as described hereinabove. The contemplated perforating gun includes a plurality of shaped charges each having an inlay coupled thereto. The shaped charges and their associated inlays may have a design as described with respect to
Various perforating gun assemblies were made and tested according to the embodiments of the disclosure. Each perforating gun included six (6) conical shaped charges positioned in a cylindrical shaped charge carrier (phased 60-degrees apart) with a detonating cord extending through a body of the carrier and in communication with each shaped charge. Each shaped charge included an explosive load of cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine (RDX) and a liner positioned atop the explosive load. The shaped charges were detonated in a casing filled with a fluid to mimic the wellbore environment. The open areas presented in Tables 1-4 below are based on the total open area measured and calculated upon formation of perforations in the casing. To obtain the open areas, the maximum and minimum widths of the perforation hole in the casing were measured and averaged, and the average width was multiplied by the maximum height of the perforation hole in the casing.
To obtain the data in Table 1, standard conical shaped charges were positioned in perforating gun. Each shaped charge was phased at 60° from adjacent shaped charges. The perforating gun was positioned in a casing in a decentralized manner so that the clearance between the perforating gun and the casing varied along the length of the perforating gun. The shaped charges were detonated so that a perforating jet penetrated and formed circular-shaped perforations in the casing. The open area of each perforation was measured. As indicated in Table 1, the size of the perforations ranged from 71 mm2 to 87 mm2.
To obtain the data in Table 2, standard conical shaped charges were equipped with inlays configured generally as shown in
To obtain the data in Table 3, standard conical shaped charges were configured substantially as described hereinabove with respect to the arrangement of the conical shaped charges of Test 2. The inlays of the shaped charges tested in Test 3 were arranged in a different manner than Test 2, in that the shaped charges were positioned in the perforating so that the two fingers of the inlays extend in the same direction as the body of the perforating gun. The shaped charges in the decentralized perforating gun were detonated so that a perforating jet penetrated and formed slot-shaped perforations in the casing. The open area of each slot-shaped perforation was measured, and as indicated in Table 3, the size of the open areas of the perforations ranged from 289 mm2 to 359 mm2—a marked increase in size from the data in Table 1 and the data in Table 2.
To obtain the data in Table 4, standard conical shaped charges as described hereinabove with respect to Tests 2 and 3 were used. The inlays of the shaped charges tested in Test 4 were arranged in the perforating gun in a different manner than in Tests 2 and 3, in that the shaped charges were positioned in the perforating so that the fingers of the inlays were at a 45° angle to a length of the perforating gun. The shaped charges in the decentralized perforating gun were detonated so that a perforating jet penetrated and formed slot-shaped perforations in the casing. The open area of each slot-shaped perforation was measured, and as indicated in Table 4, the size of the open areas of the perforations ranged from 260 mm2 to 407 mm2—a marked increase in size from the open areas of the standard conical shaped charges (with no inlays) tested and the data of which is presented in Table 1.
The data presented in the Tables 2-4 indicated that the perforations created by the conical shaped charges equipped with inlays were not only elongated/slot-shaped, which is ideal for fracturing applications. It was also observed that the perforations may also have enlarged surface areas.
The present disclosure, in various embodiments, configurations and aspects, includes components, methods, processes, systems and/or apparatus substantially developed as depicted and described herein, including various embodiments, sub-combinations, and subsets thereof. Those of skill in the art will understand how to make and use the present disclosure after understanding the present disclosure. The present disclosure, in various embodiments, configurations and aspects, includes providing devices and processes in the absence of items not depicted and/or described herein or in various embodiments, configurations, or aspects hereof, including in the absence of such items as may have been used in previous devices or processes, e.g., for improving performance, achieving ease and/or reducing cost of implementation.
The phrases “at least one”, “one or more”, and “and/or” are open-ended expressions that are both conjunctive and disjunctive in operation. For example, each of the expressions “at least one of A, B and C”, “at least one of A, B, or C”, “one or more of A, B, and C”, “one or more of A, B, or C” and “A, B, and/or C” means A alone, B alone, C alone, A and B together, A and C together, B and C together, or A, B and C together.
In this specification and the claims that follow, reference will be made to a number of terms that have the following meanings. The terms “a” (or “an”) and “the” refer to one or more of that entity, thereby including plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. As such, the terms “a” (or “an”), “one or more” and “at least one” can be used interchangeably herein. Furthermore, references to “one embodiment”, “some embodiments”, “an embodiment” and the like are not intended to be interpreted as excluding the existence of additional embodiments that also incorporate the recited features. Approximating language, as used herein throughout the specification and claims, may be applied to modify any quantitative representation that could permissibly vary without resulting in a change in the basic function to which it is related. Accordingly, a value modified by a term such as “about” is not to be limited to the precise value specified. In some instances, the approximating language may correspond to the precision of an instrument for measuring the value. Terms such as “first,” “second,” “upper,” “lower” etc. are used to identify one element from another, and unless otherwise specified are not meant to refer to a particular order or number of elements.
As used herein, the terms “may” and “may be” indicate a possibility of an occurrence within a set of circumstances; a possession of a specified property, characteristic or function; and/or qualify another verb by expressing one or more of an ability, capability, or possibility associated with the qualified verb. Accordingly, usage of “may” and “may be” indicates that a modified term is apparently appropriate, capable, or suitable for an indicated capacity, function, or usage, while taking into account that in some circumstances the modified term may sometimes not be appropriate, capable, or suitable. For example, in some circumstances an event or capacity can be expected, while in other circumstances the event or capacity cannot occur—this distinction is captured by the terms “may” and “may be.”
As used in the claims, the word “comprises” and its grammatical variants logically also subtend and include phrases of varying and differing extent such as for example, but not limited thereto, “consisting essentially of” and “consisting of.” Where necessary, ranges have been supplied, and those ranges are inclusive of all sub-ranges therebetween. It is to be expected that variations in these ranges will suggest themselves to a practitioner having ordinary skill in the art and, where not already dedicated to the public, the appended claims should cover those variations.
The terms “determine”, “calculate” and “compute,” and variations thereof, as used herein, are used interchangeably and include any type of methodology, process, mathematical operation or technique.
The foregoing discussion of the present disclosure has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. The foregoing is not intended to limit the present disclosure to the form or forms disclosed herein. In the foregoing Detailed Description for example, various features of the present disclosure are grouped together in one or more embodiments, configurations, or aspects for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. The features of the embodiments, configurations, or aspects of the present disclosure may be combined in alternate embodiments, configurations, or aspects other than those discussed above. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the present disclosure requires more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, the claimed features lie in less than all features of a single foregoing disclosed embodiment, configuration, or aspect. Thus, the following claims are hereby incorporated into this Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate embodiment of the present disclosure.
Advances in science and technology may make equivalents and substitutions possible that are not now contemplated by reason of the imprecision of language; these variations should be covered by the appended claims. This written description uses examples to disclose the method, machine and computer-readable medium, including the best mode, and also to enable any person of ordinary skill in the art to practice these, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scope thereof is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those of ordinary skill in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they have structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal language of the claims.
This application is a divisional patent application of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/258,810 filed Jan. 28, 2019, which is a continuation-in-part patent application of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/002,217 filed Jun. 7, 2018, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional patent application No. 62/654,306 filed Apr. 6, 2018, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2644530 | Baker | Jul 1953 | A |
2799343 | Conrad | Jul 1957 | A |
2821136 | Castel | Jan 1958 | A |
3208378 | Boop | Sep 1965 | A |
3251300 | Reyne | May 1966 | A |
3303884 | Medford | Feb 1967 | A |
3444810 | Hakala | May 1969 | A |
3589453 | Venghiattis | Jun 1971 | A |
3777663 | Brown | Dec 1973 | A |
4063512 | Davis | Dec 1977 | A |
4109576 | Eckels | Aug 1978 | A |
4234768 | Boop | Nov 1980 | A |
4457383 | Boop | Jul 1984 | A |
4479556 | Stout et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4519313 | Leidel | May 1985 | A |
4635734 | Donovan et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4672896 | Precoul et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4702171 | Tai et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4817531 | Walker et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4829901 | Yates, Jr. | May 1989 | A |
4832134 | Gill | May 1989 | A |
4862804 | Chawla et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
5040619 | Jordan et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5155293 | Barton | Oct 1992 | A |
5379845 | Blount et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5565644 | Chawla | Oct 1996 | A |
5753850 | Chawla et al. | May 1998 | A |
5792980 | Weimann | Aug 1998 | A |
6014933 | Umphries et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6148263 | Brooks et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6173651 | Pathe et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6397947 | Behrmann et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6401818 | Papanastasiou | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6510796 | Mayseless et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6520258 | Yang et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
7044225 | Haney et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7066261 | Vicente et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7588080 | McCoy | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7712416 | Pratt et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7789153 | Prinz et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7819064 | Saenger et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7886842 | Howard et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7987911 | Rhodes et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8156871 | Behrmann et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8418622 | Pham et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8505454 | Boyer et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8931569 | Fagley et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9045692 | Lumley | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9291435 | Scheid et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9360222 | Collier | Jun 2016 | B1 |
9428979 | Bell et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9612093 | Collier et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9612095 | Smart et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9651263 | Collier | May 2017 | B2 |
9683821 | Stecher et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9702669 | Powell | Jul 2017 | B1 |
9725993 | Yang et al. | Aug 2017 | B1 |
9845666 | Hardesty et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
10047591 | Bell et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10047592 | Burgos et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10227851 | CoIlins et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10240441 | Geerts et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10364387 | Collier et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10480295 | Walker et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10520286 | Loehken | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10533401 | Hinton et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10598002 | Sites | Mar 2020 | B2 |
10683703 | Faircloth et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10683735 | McCarthy et al. | Jun 2020 | B1 |
10739115 | Loehken | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10767430 | Covalt et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10774624 | Yang et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10830566 | Maxted et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10858920 | Wells | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10954760 | McNelis | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10982513 | Gupta et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
11002118 | Hinton et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11053782 | Loehken et al. | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11078762 | Mauldin et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
11220891 | Metzger | Jan 2022 | B2 |
11340047 | Loehken | May 2022 | B2 |
11499401 | Eitschberger | Nov 2022 | B2 |
20010052303 | Mayseless et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020185275 | Yang et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030098158 | George et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030183113 | Barlow et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040216868 | Owen | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050115448 | Pratt et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060075889 | Walker | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20080073081 | Frazier et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20090050321 | Rhodes et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090151588 | Burleson et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100230163 | Hales et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100252323 | Goodman et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110024117 | Cardenas et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110155013 | Boyer et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120281829 | Rudakevych et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130220613 | Brooks et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130220614 | Torres et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140008071 | Patterson et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140144702 | Walker | May 2014 | A1 |
20140251612 | Powers | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150285019 | Wood et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150316360 | Hinton et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160153267 | Walker et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160169639 | Smart et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160208587 | Hardesty et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160349021 | Collier et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170032653 | Crawford et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170051586 | Wells et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170175498 | Segura | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20180045498 | Teowee et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20200040714 | Surjaatmadja et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20210048284 | Maxted et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
20210238966 | Preiss et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210381348 | Wuensche et al. | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20220074719 | Yang | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220081999 | Wesson | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220403718 | Eitschberger | Dec 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
741792 | Dec 2001 | AU |
2010217183 | Jun 2016 | AU |
3101558 | Dec 2019 | CA |
2648065 | Oct 2004 | CN |
201184775 | Jan 2009 | CN |
101178005 | Oct 2010 | CN |
202165062 | Mar 2012 | CN |
202810806 | Mar 2013 | CN |
104278976 | Jan 2015 | CN |
104989335 | Oct 2015 | CN |
205805521 | Dec 2016 | CN |
104314529 | Jan 2017 | CN |
205895214 | Jan 2017 | CN |
209195375 | Aug 2019 | CN |
210598934 | May 2020 | CN |
213297926 | May 2021 | CN |
216593019 | May 2022 | CN |
19630339 | Jan 1997 | DE |
0184622 | Jun 1986 | EP |
0207749 | Jan 1987 | EP |
0216527 | Nov 1990 | EP |
0773425 | May 1997 | EP |
1345003 | Sep 2003 | EP |
1682846 | Jul 2006 | EP |
3277913 | Feb 2018 | EP |
3239648 | Sep 2018 | EP |
3478928 | Jun 2021 | EP |
2000183 | Jan 1988 | ES |
2295664 | Jun 1996 | GB |
2303687 | Feb 1997 | GB |
2522413 | Apr 2017 | GB |
7852 | Oct 1998 | RU |
2187778 | Aug 2002 | RU |
2542024 | Feb 2015 | RU |
2579307 | Apr 2016 | RU |
2005103602 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2006054081 | May 2006 | WO |
2009117548 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2011160099 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2015179713 | Nov 2015 | WO |
2017062444 | Apr 2017 | WO |
2018057949 | Mar 2018 | WO |
2019071027 | Apr 2019 | WO |
2019117874 | Jun 2019 | WO |
WO-2019192773 | Oct 2019 | WO |
2020154061 | Jul 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority in PCT/EP2019/054442 (Year: 2019). |
International Search Report in PCT/EP2019/054442 (Year: 2019). |
Naeem, Khalid et al., A Review of Shaped Charge Variables for its Optimum Performance, Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 2019, 8 pages. |
Pyka et al., Applied Sciences Numerical and Experimental Studies of the ŁK Type Shaped Charge, Aug. 15, 2020, 20 pgs., https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344387825_Numerical_and_Experimental_Studies_of_the_LK_Type_Shaped_Charge. |
Ugreie et al., Initiation and Correction of the Detonation Wave in the Shaped Charge Peripheral Zone, Scientific Technical Review, 2011,vol. 61,No. 1, 9 pgs., http://www.vti.mod.gov.rs/ntp/rad2011/1-11/3/3.pdf. |
Andy Martin & Harvey Williams, Fracture Initiationfrom Perforations, presentation at Schlumberger, IPS-14-02, May 12, 2014, 33 pgs. |
David Cuthill, Weatherford, Experiences with Advanced Perforating Systems, paper presented at 2008 International Perforating Symposium, 23 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of International App. No. PCT/EP2019/054442, dated May 21, 2019; 14 pgs. |
Stephen Rassenfoss, Rethinking Fracturing at the Point of Attack, Apr. 1, 2018, 6 pgs, https://www.spe.org/en/print-article/?art=4007. |
Waters & Wang, The Impact of Geomechanics and Perforation on Hydraulic Fracture Initiation & Complexity in Horizontal Well Completions, Sep. 26-28, 2016, SPE-181684-MS, 36 pg. |
Brico Oil Tools; BT Tool Inspection, Care and Maintenance Guideline; Setting Tool Inspection Information Product Family No. 41-21; dated Jan. 11, 2014; https://www.bricooiltools.com/pdfs/Brico-Setting-Tool-lnspection-manual.pdf. |
Czech Republic Industrial Property Office; Office Action for CZ Application No. 2019549; dated Feb. 25, 2021; 3 pages. |
Dynaenergetics Europe GMBH; Exposed Gun Subs & Accessories; dated May 23, 2017; https://www.dynaenergetics.com/products/hardware-and-tcp/perforating-gun-systems/exposed-gun-subs-accessories. |
Dynaenergetics Europe GMBH; Patent Owner's Preliminary Response for PGR No. 2021-00089; dated Sep. 16, 2021; 106 pages. |
Harrison Jet Guns; Image of “xtra penetrator”. |
International Searching Authority; International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/EP2021/057570; dated Sep. 13, 2021; 21 pages. |
International Searching Authority; International Searching Authority Partial Search Report and Invitation to Pay Additional Search Fees for PCT/EP2021/057570; dated Jul. 22, 2021; 17 pages. |
Rodgers, John; Declaration for Civil Action No. 3:20-CV-00376; dated Jul. 8, 2021; 32 pages. |
Rodgers, John; Declaration for PGR No. 2021-00089; dated Sep. 16, 2021; 93 pages. |
Rodgers, John; Declaration for PGR2021-00078; dated Aug. 19, 2021; 137 pages. |
Scharf, Thilo; Declaration for PGR No. 2021-00089; dated Sep. 16, 2021; 8 pages. |
Schlumberger Technology Corporation; Defendant's Preliminary Invalidity Contentions; dated Aug. 19, 2021; 213 pages. |
Schlumberger Technology Corporation; Exhibit A-01 to Defendant's Preliminary Invalidity Contentions Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 10,844,696 over WO20190148009; dated Aug. 19, 2021; 267 pages. |
Schlumberger Technology Corporation; Exhibit A-02 to Defendant's Preliminary Invalidity Contentions Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 10,844,696 over U.S. Pat. No. 4,598,775; dated Aug. 19, 2021; 178 pages. |
Schlumberger Technology Corporation; Exhibit A-03 to Defendant's Preliminary Invalidity Contentions Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 10,844,696 over U.S. Pat. No. 4,753,301; dated Aug. 19, 2021; 178 pages. |
Schlumberger Technology Corporation; Exhibit A-04 to Defendant's Preliminary Invalidity Contentions Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 10,844,696 over U.S. Pat. No. 10,746,003; dated Aug. 19, 2021; 186 pages. |
Schlumberger Technology Corporation; Exhibit A-05 to Defendant's Preliminary Invalidity Contentions Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 10,844,696 over WO2017/024266; dated Aug. 19, 2021; 247 pages. |
Schlumberger Technology Corporation; Exhibit A-06 to Defendant's Preliminary Invalidity Contentions Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 10,844,696 over U.S. Pat. No. 4,479,556; dated Aug. 19, 2021; 250 pages. |
Schlumberger Technology Corporation; Exhibit A-07 to Defendant's Preliminary Invalidity Contentions Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 10,844,696 over US2017/0145798; dated Aug. 19, 2021; 279 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/736,298; dated Sep. 25, 2018; 120 pages. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Office Action for CA Application No. 2,941,648; dated Jul. 12, 2021; 3 pages. |
Schlumberger; 3.12-in Frac Gun; dated 2007; 2 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210293121 A1 | Sep 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62654306 | Apr 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16258810 | Jan 2019 | US |
Child | 17336617 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16002217 | Jun 2018 | US |
Child | 16258810 | US |