1. Field of Invention
This invention relates to perimeter security barriers, and in particular but not exclusively, to barriers that provide an effective perimeter protection against wilful intrusion around airports and the like.
2. Discussion of Related Art
Conventional perimeter security barriers are designed to withstand vehicle impacts but differ from road crash barriers in that they resist vehicle impacts in a direction substantially perpendicular to the perimeter barrier. Conventional road crash barriers, by contrast, are designed to deflect vehicles impacting the fence an angle of 15 to 25 degrees relative to the fence (i.e. low angles) at speeds up to 110 km/h (68 mph).
The problem with conventional perimeter security barriers is that they are unable to prevent transgression of heavy impacting vehicles. They are of solid construction, usually of concrete blocks, making them unsightly and difficult to install. It is therefore an aim of the present invention to provide a perimeter security barrier that can arrest heavy vehicle impacts (e.g. goods vehicles).
According to the present invention, there is provided a perimeter security barrier for restraining a vehicle impacting the barrier from a predetermined direction substantially perpendicular thereto or between 25 and 90 degrees relative to the barrier, the barrier comprising a pair of spaced apart end posts rigidly fixed in or on the ground, at least one intermediate post disposed between the end posts also fixed in the ground, and at least one wire rope between the end posts, wherein the rope is secured at each end to respective end posts, and energy absorption means is provided at said each end for absorbing energy transmitted by the ropes from the impacting vehicle. Embodiments of the present invention can therefore restrain vehicles impacting the barrier at high angles. Embodiments of the invention may be used as anti-terrorist fences and/or for restraining heavy vehicles.
In a preferred embodiment, the rope is secured to the end posts via the energy absorption means that may be configured to deform as the ropes tension under the action of the impacting vehicle. A section that deforms or collapses in the event of a vehicle impact may provide the energy absorbing means. The section may be a steel channel section or a form of rubber or plastic sandwich compound.
Barriers embodying the present invention are advantageously configured so that the height of the barrier is effective for resisting vehicle impact along its entire length between the end posts.
Any or all of the at least one wire ropes may be located at a predetermined height above the ground. Means may be provided, configured for retaining the at least one rope at this predetermined height during an impact.
In an embodiment, the at least one wire rope may be attached to one or more of the at least one intermediate posts. The attachment of the rope(s) to the intermediate posts and/or the fixing of the at least one intermediate posts in or on the ground keeps the ropes substantially at the predetermined height during an impact.
In an embodiment, the ropes may be supported on the intermediate post(s) by hooks configured to permit release of the ropes relative to the intermediate post(s) in an upward direction. In the event of an impact, the release of the ropes from the posts assists in maintaining the ropes at the desired height above the ground.
In another embodiment, any or all of the at least one intermediate posts are releasably fixed in or on the ground. Any or all of the at least one intermediate posts may be frangible or mounted on a shear base mechanism. In the event of an impact, the post shears at its base. One or more of the ropes may remain attached thereto during an impact.
In various embodiments, one or more unwoven wire ropes may be provided between the end posts, unwoven relative to the intermediate posts. A second rope may be provided and may be woven around the intermediate posts. Further ropes may be added, unwoven or woven relative to the intermediate posts. At least one of the unwoven ropes is positioned about the intermediate post and disposed on a side thereof facing the predetermined direction. In a preferred embodiment, three wire ropes, unwoven relative to the intermediate post and disposed on a side thereof facing the predetermined direction, are provided. In addition to the three unwoven wire ropes, in some embodiments, the barrier may have two pairs of wire ropes woven around said intermediate posts, one of the pairs being positioned towards the top of the end and intermediate posts, and the other pair being positioned substantially midway between the top of the posts and the ground. One of the three unwoven wire ropes may be positioned between the pairs of wire ropes and the other two of said three unwoven wire ropes may be positioned between the midway pair and the ground. The ropes are preferably tensioned between the end posts. The wire ropes may be of any suitable material, including steel strand or cable, or a high-carbon, high-tensile steel strand, or a fibre reinforced plastic material.
The intermediate posts are preferably inclined relative to the vertical towards the predetermined direction, that is, towards the oncoming vehicle. The inclination of the intermediate post(s) to the vertical may be between 0 and 45 degrees, preferably between 0 and 20 degrees, and more preferably 10 degrees.
Embodiments of the present invention are advantageous in that they may resist or prevent transgression of heavy goods vehicles impacting at speed in a direction substantially perpendicular to the perimeter or in a direction between 25 and 90 degrees to the perimeter. Embodiments may be designed to prevent access to secure areas, such as airfields or airports, by goods vehicles up to 7,500 Kg inertial mass impacting the barrier at up to 90 degrees at speeds of to 48 to 80 km/hr. Embodiments may be able to withstand impact energies in the order of 1852 KJ.
The invention will be further described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
The barrier 1 includes seven wire ropes 15a to 15g that span the line of the barrier between the end posts 3, 5. The ropes may be of high tensile steel and pretensioned between the posts 3 and 5. In this embodiment, they are arranged such that two pairs 15c, 15d and 15f, 15g respectively are sinuously wound around the intermediate posts 11a . . . as illustrated in the plan view of the barrier in
In an alternative embodiment, shown in
An electric current may be passed through one or more of the wire ropes of the barrier and coupled to detection equipment configured to permit detection of the location of an impact on the barrier. This may be used to trigger an alarm or warning device.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0705267.3 | Mar 2007 | GB | national |
0714522.0 | Jul 2007 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2008/000997 | 3/20/2008 | WO | 00 | 10/13/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/114027 | 9/25/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1892222 | Russell | Dec 1932 | A |
2009364 | Tufts | Jul 1935 | A |
2093577 | Shepherd | Sep 1937 | A |
2204557 | Ahles | Jun 1940 | A |
2239667 | Ahles | Apr 1941 | A |
2518004 | Nevil | Aug 1950 | A |
3353795 | Muller | Nov 1967 | A |
3499630 | Dashio | Mar 1970 | A |
5039066 | Stacey | Aug 1991 | A |
5145278 | Lohrmann | Sep 1992 | A |
5395105 | Thommen, Jr. | Mar 1995 | A |
5481835 | Bloom | Jan 1996 | A |
6065738 | Pearce et al. | May 2000 | A |
6488268 | Albritton | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6948703 | Alberson et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7367549 | Titmus | May 2008 | B2 |
7401996 | Neusch | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7798741 | Neusch | Sep 2010 | B2 |
20050232693 | Sharp et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060255937 | Wong | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070284562 | Bunk et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
693639 | Nov 2003 | CH |
1273557 | Jul 1968 | DE |
0018619 | Nov 1980 | EP |
0258585 | Mar 1988 | EP |
0369659 | May 1990 | EP |
2457929 | Dec 1980 | FR |
1005931 | Sep 1965 | GB |
1417109 | Dec 1975 | GB |
2406127 | Mar 2005 | GB |
2433285 | Jun 2007 | GB |
11148118 | Jun 1999 | JP |
2001317580 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2007071725 | Jun 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Search Report from UK Application No. GB0805244.1, dated Jul. 2, 2008. |
Search Report from UK Application No. GB0705267.3, dated Jul. 4, 2007. |
Search Report from UK Application No. GB0714522.0, dated Oct. 29, 2007. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/GB2008/000997, dated Jun. 24, 2008. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100084623 A1 | Apr 2010 | US |