The present invention relates generally to medical fluid systems and more particularly to the testing and priming of such systems.
It is known in peritoneal dialysis systems to perform integrity tests that attempt to verify that the numerous fluid valves in a disposable cassette do not leak, that leaks do not occur between multiple pump chambers in the cassette, that leaks do not occur across fluid pathways, and that an isolation occluder, which is intended to stop liquid flow in fluid lines connected to the cassette in the event of a system malfunction, is performing that procedure properly. In one known wet leak test described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,350,357, a disposable cassette is loaded into a peritoneal dialysis cycler and the solution bags are connected. The test consists of the following steps:
(i) a negative pressure decay test of the fluid valve diaphragms is performed;
(ii) a positive pressure decay test of the fluid valve diaphragms is performed;
(iii) a positive pressure decay test is performed on the first pump chamber, while a negative pressure decay test is performed on the second pump chamber;
(iv) a negative pressure decay test is performed on the first pump chamber, while a positive pressure decay test is performed on the second pump chamber; after which
(v) both pump chambers are filled with a measured volume of fluid, all fluid valves are opened and the occluder is closed, positive pressure is applied to both pump chambers for a period of time, after which the volume of fluid in each pump chamber is measured again to determine if any fluid has leaked across the occluder.
As indicated, the above testing procedure is performed after solution bags are connected to the peritoneal dialysis system. If integrity of the cassette or tubing is faulty, the sterility of the solution bags becomes compromised. In such a case, both the disposable cassette and solution bags have to be discarded. Additionally, it is possible that liquid from the solution bags can be sucked into the machine's pneumatic system, causing the pneumatic system of the machine to malfunction.
Wet tests are also susceptible to false triggers. In particular, cold solution used in the test causes many false disposable integrity test alarms each year because the tests fail when an occluder, which is supposed to clamp off all fluid lines, does not properly crimp or seal the tubing lines. When the solution is cold, it cools the set tubing to a lower temperature than the tubing would be if placed only in room air. Colder tubing is harder to occlude, allowing fluid in some cases to leak past the occluder and cause the test to fail. Once a dialysis therapy starts, the fluid passing through the tubing is warmed to about 37° C., enabling the occluder to perform satisfactorily.
It is therefore desirable to have an integrity test that is performed before the solution bags are attached to the therapy machine and to eliminate the use of cold solution to prevent false triggers.
A “dry” test is described briefly in U.S. Pat. No. 6,302,653. The description is based in part upon the “dry test” implemented in the Baxter HomeChoice® cycler in December of 1998. The actual test implemented in the HomeChoice® cycler consists of four steps, the first of which occurs before the solution bags are connected. The next three steps require the solution bags to be connected but do not require fluid to be pulled from the bags into the machine.
Moreover, dry testing with air is believed to be more sensitive than the wet test, which uses dialysis fluid. It is therefore also desirable to have an integrity test that uses air for sensitivity reasons as well as for the reasons stated above.
While integrity testing poses one problem to manufacturers of medical fluid machines, another common problem is the priming of the fluid system within those machines. In many instances, air must be purged from one or more tubes for safety purposes. For example, in the realm of dialysis, it is imperative to purge air from the system, so that the patient's peritoneum or veins and arteries receive dialysis fluid that is free of air. Consequently, automated dialysis machines have been provided heretofore with priming systems. In peritoneal dialysis, the object of priming is to push fluid to the very end of the line, where the patient connector that connects to the patient's transfer set is located, while not priming fluid past the connector, allowing fluid to spill out of the system.
Typically, dialysis machines have used gravity to prime. Known gravity primed systems have a number of drawbacks. First, some priming systems are designed for specifically sized bags. If other sized bags are used, the priming system does not work properly. Second, it happens in many systems that at the beginning of priming, a mixture of air and fluid can be present in the patient line near its proximal end close to a disposable cartridge or cassette. Fluid sometimes collects in the cassette due to the installation and/or integrity testing of same. Such fluid collection can cause air gaps between that fluid and the incoming priming solution. The air gaps can impede and sometimes prevent gravity priming Indeed, many procedural guides include a step of tapping a portion of the patient line when the line does not appear to be priming properly. That tapping is meant to dislodge any air bubbles that are trapped in the fluid line.
A third problem that occurs relatively often in priming is that the patient forgets to remove the clamp on the patient line prior to priming that line. That clamped line will not allow the line to prime properly. An alarm is needed to inform the patient specifically that the patient needs to remove the clamp from the patient line before proceeding with the remainder of therapy. Fourth, if vented tip protectors are provided at the end of the patient line, the vented tip protectors may not vent properly and impede priming. An alarm is again needed to inform the patient that the line has not primed properly. Fifth, cost is always a factor. Besides providing a priming apparatus and method that overcomes the above problems, it is also desirable to use existing components to perform the priming, if possible, to avoid having to add additional components and additional costs.
Another concern for medical fluid systems and in particular automated peritoneal dialysis (“APD”) systems is ensuring that solution bags are placed at a height relative to the machine that is suitable for the machine to operate within designated parameters. The height of solution bags, such as dialysate bags, lactate bags and/or dextrose bags, needs to be monitored to ensure that the proper amount of fluid will be pumped to the patient during therapy and that the correct amount and proportion of additives are infused. Two patents discussing bag position determination are U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,497,676 and 6,503,062.
The present invention in one primary embodiment performs an integrity test on both the cassette sheeting and the molded cassette features of a disposable cassette. The methodology of the invention is applicable to many cassette based pumping and liquid distribution systems and is particularly suited for dialysis treatment, such as automated peritoneal dialysis. The steps of the integrity test are performed almost exclusively before solution bags, such as peritoneal dialysis solution bags, are connected to a dialysis therapy machine, such as a peritoneal dialysis machine. Such a test is advantageous because if an integrity problem arises, the patient only has to discard the disposable cassette and associated tubing, not the solution. Also, because fluid is not connected to the machine to perform the test, there is no opportunity for fluid, due to a leak, to be sucked into the machine's pneumatics, potentially causing malfunction.
The dry testing of the present invention is performed with all fluid lines capped except for the drain line, which is covered with a tip protector and/or membrane that allows air but not liquid to escape. Because the lines remain capped, they are not connected to the solution bags. Consequently, no solution bags become contaminated if the cassette has a leak.
The testing steps are able to be performed with capped lines for a number of reasons. In some steps, the tip protectors, or caps, connected to all lines except the drain line are left in place because the cassette sheeting and fluid pathways are tested with valves in the open position rather than the closed position. When the valves are open, all of the fluid channels in the cassette are in direct communication with both pump chambers and the drain line, which has a bacteria retentive tip protector that allows air to pass through it. Air from a failed test can therefore pass through the drain line from cassette, changing the pressure in the system so that a leak can be detected.
In other test steps, the tip protectors can be left in place because one part of the system is pressurized, while the other is evacuated. Air leaking from the positively pressurized part of the cassette leaks to the evacuated part and is readily detectable as is air escaping from or leaking into the cassette. Further, because air flows more readily than does water or solution through a leak, the air test is more expedient and sensitive than a fluid based test, increasing accuracy and repeatability and decreasing test time.
The present invention in another primary embodiment provides an apparatus and method for priming a medical fluid delivery system. The priming method and apparatus is described herein for an automated peritoneal dialysis machine, however, the test is applicable to any fluid delivery system, which requires the purging of air for safety or operational reasons. The method and apparatus operates with a system having a fluid container or fluid bag, at least one fluid pump and at least one tubing line, such as a patient line extending from that fluid pump. In a first step of the priming method, valves surrounding the fluid pump are configured so that fluid flows via gravity or via the pump into the pump chamber and fills such pump chamber but does not exit the chamber. In a second step, the valves are switched so that the fluid in the supply bag is no longer able to fill the pump chambers, and so that the pump chambers can be pressurized and thereby pump the fluid from the pump chambers downstream and partially into the patient line. The machine processor is configured to expect a pressure drop in the pump chamber when the pump chamber expels fluid therefrom. If such pressure drop is not seen, the patient has likely forgotten to remove the clamp in the patient line and an error message is generated. In a final step, the valves surrounding the pump are opened so that fluid from the container or bag can continue to flow through and prime the patient line until fluid reaches the end of the patient line, which is positioned at the same elevational height as the top of the fluid in the fluid container.
As indicated above, if the patient line is inadvertently clamped during priming, the pressure in the pump chamber during the pushing step would not fall to an expected level, prompting a suitable alarm. Further, the initial pushing of fluid through the proximal part of the patient line, nearer to the cassette, in many instances will overcome the resistance to fluid flow caused by air trapped in that portion of the line, and allow priming to thereafter take place in a proper manner.
Another primary aspect of the present invention is an apparatus and method for determining the vertical position or head height of one or more solution bags as well as a drain bag. The method and apparatus use atmospheric pressure to establish a zero position relative to the therapy machine, such as an APD machine. The bag height determination can determine whether a solution bag is in the proper position to achieve a desired pumped flowrate, whether the solution bag is properly located on a heater plate, whether the relative position between two or more bags is proper, whether the drain bag is located in a proper position or whether one or more of the bags is empty, etc.
It is therefore an advantage of the present invention to provide an integrity test that consumes less time than previous practices.
It is another advantage of the present invention to provide an integrity test that is more effective at detecting leaks than previous practices.
It is a further advantage of the present invention to provide an integrity test that is more convenient for the patient if a leak is detected.
It is another advantage of the present invention to provide an integrity test that minimizes the supplies that must be discarded if a leak is detected.
It is yet another advantage of the present invention to provide an integrity test that is immune to failure of other machine components, such as a flow line occluder.
It is still another advantage of the present invention to provide an integrity test that does not require warm solution.
It is still a further advantage of the present invention to provide an integrity test from which it is possible for a user to distinguish between a failure of the disposable set and a leak in the pneumatic system of the machine or cycler.
Moreover, it is an advantage of the present invention to eliminate false triggering due to cold solution used in integrity testing.
Still further, it is an advantage of the present invention to provide a priming method and apparatus that operates to automatically dislodge air pockets located initially in the priming line, which would otherwise tend to slow or completely stop priming.
Yet another advantage of the present invention is to provide a priming method and apparatus that detects when the patient or operator has inadvertently left a clamp on the priming line, so that the therapy machine can generate a suitable alarm.
Further still, an advantage of the present invention is to be able to determine the elevational location and head height of one or more solution and drain bags.
Additional features and advantages of the present invention are described in, and will be apparent from, the following Detailed Description of the Invention and the figures.
One primary aspect of the present invention is an improved leak detection system for any type of cassette-based medical fluid therapy that exerts mechanical or pneumatic positive or negative pressure on a disposable fluid cassette. Another primary aspect of the present invention is an improved priming technique for a medical fluid therapy machine, such as an automated peritoneal dialysis (“APD”) system. While APD is one preferred use for the present invention, any cassette-based medical fluid system or system using a sterile, disposable fluid cartridge can employ the apparatuses and methods of the present invention. A further primary aspect of the present invention is to provide an apparatus and method for determining the head weight of the solution.
The following method is a “dry” method, which is more sensitive to leaks and other defects when compared to fluid based integrity testing. The method also eliminates some problems associated with older tests, such as having to discard solution bags or potentially harming the mechanical components of the machine upon a leak.
Referring now to the figures and in particular to
Each of the lines 54 to 66 terminates at a first end at cassette 100 and at a second end at an organizer 42. In operation, machine 150 holds organizer 42 initially at a height that enables a gravity prime to fill fluid at least substantially to the end of at least some of the lines 54 to 66 without filling fluid past connectors located at the end of these lines. Priming is discussed in more detail below.
In a set-up portion of the integrity test of the present invention, disposable cassette 100 is loaded into dialysis machine 150. To do so, an air pump (not illustrated) is turned on. That air pump communicates with various pneumatic components illustrated in
Referring now to
Simultaneous pressure decay tests are then conducted on the: (i) air volume in the low positive tank 220 and pump chambers P1 and P2; and (ii) the air volume in the negative tank 214 and fluid valves V1 to V10. If the pressure decay in the positive pressure system exceeds, e.g., one psig, an alarm is sent displaying a pump chamber sheeting damaged error or code therefore. If the difference in pressure in the negative pressure system exceeds, e.g., one psig, an alarm is sent displaying a fluid valve sheeting damaged error or code therefore. Positive pressure tested areas for this first step are shown in double hatch and negative pressure tested areas are shown in single hatch in
Importantly, test step one tests cassette 100 from the outside. That is, the pressure is applied to the outside of the sheeting over pump chambers P1 and P2 and negative pressure is applied to the outside of the sheeting over valves V1 to V10. As described below, the remaining test steps apply positive pressure and negative pressure to the sheeting from inside the cassette. The designation of the Figures however is the same, namely, positive pressure tested areas (internal and external) are shown using a double hatch. Negative pressure tested areas (internal and external) are shown using a single hatch. The ports 108 tested in each step are darkened and labeled either “positive pressure tested” or “negative pressure tested”.
Referring now to
Next, a first set of simultaneous pressure decay/rise tests is conducted on low positive pressure tank 222 and negative pressure tank 214. The difference in pressure in both positive pressure tank 220 and negative pressure tank 214 is recorded as well as the final pressure in positive pressure tank 220 and negative pressure tank 214. Valve V3 is opened and a second set of simultaneous pressure decay/rise tests is conducted on low positive pressure tank 220 and negative pressure tank 214 as the contents of pump chamber P2 flow freely into pump chamber P1 through open valves V1 and V3. If the sum of difference in pressures from the first set of pressure decay tests exceeds, for example, two psig, and the sum of the difference in pressure from the second set of tests is less than one psig, an alarm is issued for a cross-talk leakage error. Positive pressure tested areas for the second step are shown in double hatch and with ports 108 so marked and negative pressure tested areas are shown in single hatch and with ports 108 so labeled in
Referring now to
Next, a first set of simultaneous pressure decay/rise tests is conducted on low positive pressure tank 222 and negative pressure tank 214. The difference in pressure in both positive tank 220 and negative tank 214 is recorded as well as the final pressure in positive pressure tank 220 and negative pressure tank 214. Valve V1 is opened and a second set of simultaneous pressure decay/rise tests is conducted on low positive pressure tank 220 and negative pressure tank 214 as the contents of pump chamber P2 flow freely into pump chamber P1 through open valves V1 and V3. If the sum of the difference in pressure from the first set of pressure decay tests exceeds, for example, 2 psig, and the sum of the difference in pressure from the second set of tests is less than one psig, a cross-talk leakage error alarm or code therefore is sent. Positive pressure tested areas for the third step are shown in double hatch and with ports 108 so marked and negative pressure tested areas are shown in single hatch and with ports 108 so marked in
Referring now to
Next, a first set of simultaneous pressure decay/rise tests is conducted on low positive pressure tank 222 and negative pressure tank 214. A difference in pressure in both positive tank 220 and negative tank 214 is recorded as well as the final pressure in positive pressure tank 220 and negative pressure tank 214. Valve V3 is opened and a second set of simultaneous pressure decay/rise tests is conducted on low positive pressure tank 220 and negative pressure tank 214 as the contents of pump chamber P2 flow freely into pump chamber P1 through open valves V1 and V3. If the sum of the difference in pressure from the first set of pressure decay tests exceeds, for example, 1.5 psig, and the sum of the difference in pressure from the second set of tests is less than 0.75 psig, a cross talk leakage error alarm or code is sent and displayed. Positive pressure tested areas for the forth step are shown in double hatch and with ports 108 so marked and negative pressure tested areas are shown in single hatch and with ports so marked 108 in
Referring now to
Next, a first set of simultaneous pressure decay/rise tests is conducted on low positive pressure tank 222 and negative pressure tank 214. A difference in pressure in both positive tank 220 and negative tank 214 is recorded as well as the final pressure in positive pressure tank 220 and negative pressure tank 214. Valve V1 is opened and a second set of simultaneous pressure decay/rise tests is conducted on low positive pressure tank 220 and negative pressure tank 214 as the contents of pump chamber P2 flow freely into pump chamber P1 through open valves V1 and V3. If the sum of the difference in pressure from the first set of pressure decay tests exceeds, for example, 1.5 psig, and the sum of the difference in pressure from the second set of tests is less than 0.75 psig, for example, a cross talk leakage error alarm or code is sent and displayed. Positive pressure tested areas for the fifth step are shown in double hatch and with ports 108 so marked and negative pressure tested areas are shown in single hatch and with ports 108 so marked in
In each of test steps two through five of
Referring now to
Occluder valve C6 is de-energized so that occluder 158 closes, pinching/sealing all fluid lines 54 to 66 exiting cassette 100. All of valves V1 through V10 except for V5 and V8 are opened and a second pressure decay test is conducted by monitoring the pressure in low positive tank 220. If the difference in pressure in the low positive tank 220 exceeds, e.g., one psig, the sixth series of tests must be repeated. If the difference in pressure in the low positive tank 220 exceeds, e.g., one psig a second time, a an alarm is sent displaying occluder failed. Finally, the occluder is opened and a third pressure decay test is conducted by monitoring the pressure in low positive tank 220. Test step six verifies that tests one and two have not failed if the difference in pressure exceeds, e.g., one psig. Positive pressure tested areas for the sixth step are shown in double hatch and with ports 108 so marked in
The previous six test steps complete one embodiment of the dry integrity test of the present invention. Viewing the outcome of steps 1 to 4 of the prior art test in
Importantly, test steps two to six test the cassette from the inside. That is, positive pressure is applied inside the cassette to the inside of the cassette sheeting and negative pressure is applied inside the cassette to the inside of the cassette sheeting. The positive and negative pressure applied inside the cassette to the inside of the cassette sheeting is created by initially applying pressure (positive or negative) to the outside of the cassette and switching the valves to create the desired pressure distribution inside the cassette as described above.
The first five of the test steps (
Test steps two through five of the present invention (
Test step one of the present invention is able to leave the tip protectors connected to all lines except the drain line because the valves are tested in the open position rather than the closed position. When valves V1 to V10 are open, all of the fluid channels F1 to F11 in cassette 100 are in direct communication with both pump chambers P1 and P2 and the drain line. The drain line has a bacteria retentive tip protector that allows air to pass through it, e.g., is fitted with a hydrophobic membrane. Air from a failed test can therefore pass through the drain line from cassette 100, changing the pressure in the system so that a leak can be detected.
Test steps two through five of the disposable integrity test of the present invention are able to leave the tip protectors in place because one part of the system is pressurized while the other is evacuated. Air leaking from the positively pressurized part of cassette 100 to the evacuated part is readily detectable as is air escaping from or leaking into cassette 100. Because air flows more readily than does water or solution through a leak, the air test is more expedient and sensitive than a fluid based test, increasing accuracy and repeatability and decreasing test time.
Test steps two through five of the present invention include a redundant pressure decay test that verifies the results of the first pressure decay test. All four test steps two through five look for leaking flow from a pressurized section of cassette 100 to an evacuated section of the cassette 100. If a leak arises between the two sections of the cassette, the pressure in the two sections should tend towards equilibrium when air flows from the high pressure section to the evacuated section. The redundant test opens valves between the positive and negative sections at the completion of the first pressure decay test to verify that there is a larger pressure change if no leaks exist or a minimal pressure change if a leaks exists.
A failure of occluder 158 to properly crimp tubing lines 54 to 66 does not materially affect the results for test steps two to five because the tip protectors are in place and would otherwise seal all of the lines that are being tested. Additionally, the users/patients are instructed to close the line clamps on all but the drain line when loading set 50 into machine 150. Test step six, which tests the cassette valves V1 through V10 and the occluder 158, can be conducted dry or wet since the solution bags have been connected. The dry test would have to be pressure based, whereas the fluid test could be either pressure or volume based.
The user can clamp the drain line on the disposable set when instructed to do so after an integrity test failure when using the method of the present invention and run the disposable integrity tests again. If the tests do not show a failure a second time (for many of the failure modes), the disposable set can be held responsible for the leak and not the machine 150, e.g., the machine's pneumatic system and/or cassette/machine interface. That feature is useful when a patient seeks troubleshooting assistance. Determining that the machine 150 is working properly and that the cassette 100 is causing the failure precludes swapping a patient's machine needlessly after an integrity failure because of uncertainty about whether the cassette 100 or machine 150 is responsible for the test failure. Conversely, if the tests show a failure a second time, the machine 150 and/or the cassette/machine interface can be held responsible for the leak.
While cassette 100 is illustrated with pump chambers P1 and P2, valve chambers V1 to V10, associated ports 108, and fluid paths F1 to F11, it should be appreciated that the method of the invention is equally applicable to cassettes and actuating systems that have different pump and valve geometries than the ones shown as well as additional features, such as heaters, pressure sensors, temperature sensors, concentration sensors, blood detectors, filters, air separators, bubble detectors, etc. The cassettes can be rigid with a single side of sheeting, be rigid with dual sided sheeting, have dual sheets forming fluid pathways, have a rigid portion connected to a flexible portion, etc. The cassettes are useable in any medical fluid delivery application, such as peritoneal dialysis, hemodialysis, hemofiltration, hemodiafiltration, continuous renal replacement therapy, medication delivery, plasma pherisis, etc., and any combination thereof.
Appendix A shows data from step one of the integrity test of the present disclosure. Appendix B also shows data from step one of the integrity test of the present disclosure. In Appendix B, the bolded, larger font size data shows when defects were detected. It is noteworthy that for fifty different cassettes tested and known to be defective, all fifty defects were detected. When the drain line was clamped after the software instructed the operator to do so, forty-seven of the fifty tests no longer failed indicating that the leak was in the cassette and not the therapy machine. The other three of the fifty clamped tests were inconclusive. Those three are marked in bolded italics. It is also noteworthy that one cassette appears to have two defects and is highlighted in bold italics as well.
For the test, ten defects were created in the pump chamber sheeting and forty defects were created in the valve sheeting. All pump chamber tests were run with positive pressure and all valve sheeting tests were run with negative pressure. The defects were punctures and slits made by a 0.035 inch (0.89 mm) outside diameter hot needle or an Exacto knife with a stop positioned to create consistent slits of 0.125 inch (3.2 mm).
Appendix C shows data from the integrity test step two of the present disclosure. The positive pressures represent pressures inside pump chamber P2, as measured by pressure sensors monitoring positive tank 220 (
Turning to the priming method and apparatus of the present invention, the method and apparatus are advantageous in a number of respects. First, the method employs the pumps of the medical fluid machine 150 shown above in
Referring now to
Connector 260 as illustrated is positioned in organizer 42 discussed above in connection with
The first step of the priming method shown in
The volume of liquid that does fill patient line 66 via the pump stroke of chambers P1 and P2 does, however, push some air through vented connector 260, leaving the line partially filled with solution and partially filled with air, wherein the air is collected at the distal end and the solution resides at the proximal end of line 66. This method of dislodgement works regardless of how many extensions are added to patient line 66. Older priming sequences had varied results depending upon whether a standard or non-standard length of patient line was used. The present method is independent of patient line length and can be used with a heater bag containing as little as 1000 ml of solution as seen in Table 1.
In
If the patient line 66 is inadvertently clamped during priming, the pressure in pump chambers P1 and P2 in the step illustrated by
Appendix D shows data from the priming method of the present invention. Additionally, the data in Appendix E, Tables 3 and 4, was obtained from a software program that opened valves 256 and 258 when the pressure in pump chambers P1 and P2 fell below 0.2 psig. If the pressure did not fall to below 0.2 psig, the pressure was recorded and a message was logged that stated, “Timeout before PosP reached 0.20 psig”. A number of normal primes were performed as well as a number of primes wherein the patient line was clamped near the patient connector at the distal end of the line.
Dialysis, such as peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis or other renal therapies such as hemofiltration or hemodiafiltration can performed using multiple solution bags, such as dialysate bags, lactate bags and/or dextrose bags. In such a case, it is advantageous to determine that the required solution bags are: (i) present and (ii) located at a vertical height suitable to enable the particular therapy to be performed, for example, an automated peritoneal dialysis performed by a machine. Such determinations should be made at the beginning of therapy, e.g., during the priming and cassette integrity tests, so that the machine can alert the patient of any problems before treatment begins and/or before the patient falls asleep.
Referring now to
System 300 includes valves 326 and 328 connected fluidly to chamber 306 and valves 330 and 332 connected fluidly to chamber 308. Air/vacuum chambers 338 and 340 are placed between valves 326 and 328 and 330 and 332, respectively. Differential pressure sensors 334 and 336 sense differential pressure within chambers 338 and 340, respectively. It should be appreciated that if valves 326, 328, 330 and 332 are open, while pump chambers 306 and 308 are empty, differential pressure sensor 334 (placed between valves 326 and 328) and differential pressure sensor 336 (placed between valves 330 and 332) and are zeroed because the pressures in air/vacuum chambers 338 and 340 are equal to atmospheric pressure.
As seen in
If the pressure equivalent to that exerted by columns of solution of heights Y1 and Y2 is within a predetermined operating parameter for the medical fluid therapy system 300 (e.g., an APD system), the therapy is allowed to continue. If not, a suitable alarm is posted informing the patient or operator that one or both solution bags 302 or 304 is positioned outside the operating parameters of system 300.
A pressure difference caused by differences in the vertical positions (pressure head heights) of solution bags 302 and 304 also has to be within set limits for system 300 to operate within specification in one embodiment. An inlet side of a pump subjected to a negative head height results in less fluid being pumped for each stroke of chambers 306 and 308, as compared to strokes made when positive head height pressure is seen on the inlet side of a pump. Therefore when equal volumes of different solutions are being pumped by chambers 306 and 308 and mixed at a desired ratio, e.g., 1:1, it is advantageous for the vertical positions and corresponding pressure head heights of the two solutions to be the same or substantially the same.
The previous description of system 300 in
In the drain test, pump chambers 306 and 308 are first filled with fluid from solution bags 302 and 304, respectively, by opening valves 342 and 344, so that therapy fluid flows through fluid pathways 310 and 312, respectively, and into pump chambers 306 and 308 as shown in
Valves 342, 344, 328 and 332 are then closed and valves 318, 320, 326 and 330 are opened. Fluid flows then from pump chambers 306 and 308, through fluid pathway 322, to drain bag 324. Diaphragms 314 and 316 within pump chambers 306 and 308 move accordingly, creating vacuums respectively inside air/vacuum chambers 338 and 340. Fluid flow stops when the vacuum in air/vacuum chambers 338 and 340, measured by pressure sensors 334 and 336, respectively, is equal to a column of solution (negative pressure head height) of height Y3 shown in
The drain test ensures that the drain bag/drain line discharge is located below pump chambers 306 and 308, so that no backflow occurs due to gravity. The drain test also ensures that the drain is not located too far below the pumps and valves, wherein the location causes an adverse effect on the operation of the valves. If the pressure equivalent to a column of solution of height Y3 is within a predetermined operating parameter for the medical fluid therapy system 300, the therapy is allowed to continue. If not, a suitable alarm is posted informing the patient or operator that the drain bag 324 is positioned outside the operating parameters of system 300.
It should be understood that various changes and modifications to the presently preferred embodiments described herein will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Such changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention and without diminishing its intended advantages. It is intended that such changes and modifications be covered by the appended claims.
This application claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/373,909, filed Dec. 5, 2011, entitled, “Peritoneal Dialysis Machine”, which is a continuation of U.S. Pat. No. 8,070,709, filed Jul. 21, 2009, entitled, “Peritoneal Dialysis Machine”, which is a continuation application of U.S. Pat. No. 7,575,564, filed Oct. 27, 2004, entitled, “Improved Priming, Integrity and Head Height Methods and Apparatuses For Medical Fluid Systems”, which claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/515,815, filed Oct. 28, 2003, entitled, “Improved Priming, Integrity and Head Height Methods and Apparatuses for Medical Fluid Systems”, the entire contents of each of which are hereby incorporated by reference and relied upon.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2286613 | Fuller | Jan 1942 | A |
3327115 | Barlett | Jun 1967 | A |
3485245 | Lahr et al. | Dec 1969 | A |
3620215 | Tysk et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3626670 | Pecker | Dec 1971 | A |
3656873 | Schiff | Apr 1972 | A |
3689204 | Prisk | Sep 1972 | A |
3703959 | Raymond | Nov 1972 | A |
3707967 | Kitrilakis et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
3709222 | DeVries | Jan 1973 | A |
3792643 | Scheafer | Feb 1974 | A |
3902490 | Jacobsen | Sep 1975 | A |
3955901 | Hamilton | May 1976 | A |
3966358 | Heimes et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
3976574 | White | Aug 1976 | A |
3979284 | Granger | Sep 1976 | A |
4086653 | Gernes | Apr 1978 | A |
4126132 | Portner et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
4140118 | Jassawalla | Feb 1979 | A |
4142524 | Jassawalla et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4158530 | Bernstein | Jun 1979 | A |
4181245 | Garrett et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4187057 | Xanthopoulos | Feb 1980 | A |
4199307 | Jassawalla | Apr 1980 | A |
4235231 | Schindler et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4236880 | Archibald | Dec 1980 | A |
4252651 | Soderstrom | Feb 1981 | A |
4265601 | Mandoian | May 1981 | A |
4273121 | Jassawalla | Jun 1981 | A |
4277226 | Archibald | Jul 1981 | A |
4303376 | Seikmann | Dec 1981 | A |
4310141 | Tamura | Jan 1982 | A |
4316466 | Babb | Feb 1982 | A |
4375346 | Kraus et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4381003 | Buoncristiani | Apr 1983 | A |
4381005 | Bujan | Apr 1983 | A |
4382753 | Archibald | May 1983 | A |
4391600 | Archibald | Jul 1983 | A |
4410322 | Archibald | Oct 1983 | A |
4430048 | Fritsch | Feb 1984 | A |
4456218 | Kawabata et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4468222 | Lundquist | Aug 1984 | A |
4479761 | Bilstad et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4479762 | Bilstad et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4482584 | Hess et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4504038 | King | Mar 1985 | A |
4530759 | Schal | Jul 1985 | A |
4552552 | Polaschegg et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4559036 | Wunsch | Dec 1985 | A |
4559044 | Robinson et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4560472 | Granzow | Dec 1985 | A |
4585436 | Davis et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4613327 | Tegrarian et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4618343 | Polaschegg | Oct 1986 | A |
RE32303 | Lasker et al. | Dec 1986 | E |
4634430 | Polaschegg | Jan 1987 | A |
4639245 | Pastrone et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4642098 | Lundquist | Feb 1987 | A |
4648810 | Schippers et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4648872 | Kamen | Mar 1987 | A |
4657490 | Abbott | Apr 1987 | A |
4694848 | Jorgensen et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4703773 | Hansen et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4710166 | Thompson et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4711248 | Steuer et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4714464 | Newton | Dec 1987 | A |
4717117 | Cook | Jan 1988 | A |
4747822 | Peabody | May 1988 | A |
4747828 | Tseo | May 1988 | A |
4769134 | Allan et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4778356 | Hicks | Oct 1988 | A |
4778451 | Kamen | Oct 1988 | A |
4784576 | Bloom et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4804360 | Kamen | Feb 1989 | A |
4808161 | Kamen | Feb 1989 | A |
4816019 | Kamen | Mar 1989 | A |
4818186 | Pastrone et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4818190 | Pelmulder et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4823552 | Ezell et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4826482 | Kamen | May 1989 | A |
4828545 | Epstein et al. | May 1989 | A |
4830586 | Herter et al. | May 1989 | A |
4842582 | Mahurkar | Jun 1989 | A |
4842584 | Pastrone | Jun 1989 | A |
4848722 | Webster | Jul 1989 | A |
4850805 | Madsen et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4852851 | Webster | Aug 1989 | A |
4855356 | Holub et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4859319 | Borsari | Aug 1989 | A |
4865584 | Epstein et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4872813 | Gorton et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4886432 | Kimberlin | Dec 1989 | A |
4900302 | Newton | Feb 1990 | A |
4925152 | Huber | May 1990 | A |
4927411 | Pastrone et al. | May 1990 | A |
4942735 | Mushika et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4950230 | Kendell | Aug 1990 | A |
4956996 | Morris | Sep 1990 | A |
4976162 | Kamen | Dec 1990 | A |
5000664 | Lawless et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5002471 | Perlov | Mar 1991 | A |
5006050 | Cooke et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5053003 | Dadson et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5062774 | Kramer et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5088515 | Kamen | Feb 1992 | A |
5094820 | Maxwell et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5098262 | Wrecker et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5108844 | Blumberg et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5116203 | Natwick et al. | May 1992 | A |
5118604 | Weissman et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5125891 | Hossain et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5141493 | Jacobsen et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5163900 | Wortrich | Nov 1992 | A |
5176959 | Jevne et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5178182 | Kamen | Jan 1993 | A |
5185084 | Lapidus et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5195960 | Hossain et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5207642 | Orkin et al. | May 1993 | A |
5241985 | Faust et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5245693 | Ford et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5247434 | Peterson et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5252044 | Raines et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5292306 | Wynkoop et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5302093 | Owens et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5316452 | Bogen et al. | May 1994 | A |
5332372 | Reynolds | Jul 1994 | A |
5334139 | Jeppsson et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5338293 | Jeppsson et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5344292 | Rabenau et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5350357 | Kamen et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5378126 | Abrahamson et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5389243 | Kaplan | Feb 1995 | A |
5397222 | Moss et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5409355 | Brooke | Apr 1995 | A |
5415528 | Ogden et al. | May 1995 | A |
5419770 | Crass et al. | May 1995 | A |
5420962 | Bakke | May 1995 | A |
5421208 | Packard et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5421823 | Kamen et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5423226 | Hunter et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5429485 | Dodge | Jul 1995 | A |
5431626 | Bryant et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5458468 | Ye et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5474683 | Bryant et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5476368 | Rabenau et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5482438 | Anderson et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5482440 | Dennehey et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5487649 | Dorsey, III et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5522769 | DeGuiseppi | Jun 1996 | A |
5526844 | Kamen | Jun 1996 | A |
5533389 | Kamen et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5536412 | Ash | Jul 1996 | A |
5540568 | Rosen et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5542919 | Simon et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5554013 | Owens et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5556263 | Jacobsen et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5563584 | Rader et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5570716 | Kamen et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5575310 | Kamen et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5578012 | Kamen et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5580460 | Polaschegg | Dec 1996 | A |
5586868 | Lawless et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5588816 | Abbott et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5591344 | Kenley et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5603354 | Jacobsen et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5609572 | Lang | Mar 1997 | A |
5620312 | Hyman et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5628908 | Kamen et al. | May 1997 | A |
5632606 | Jacobsen et al. | May 1997 | A |
5634896 | Bryant et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5636653 | Titus | Jun 1997 | A |
5669764 | Behringer et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5674404 | Kenley et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5718692 | Schon et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5722947 | Jeppsson et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5758563 | Robinson | Jun 1998 | A |
5788671 | Johnson | Aug 1998 | A |
5790752 | Anglin et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5792367 | Mattisson et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5807075 | Jacobsen et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5814004 | Tamari | Sep 1998 | A |
5816779 | Lawless et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5836908 | Beden et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5871566 | Rutz | Feb 1999 | A |
5919369 | Ash | Jul 1999 | A |
5921951 | Morris | Jul 1999 | A |
5924975 | Goldowsky | Jul 1999 | A |
5931647 | Jacobsen et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5938634 | Packard | Aug 1999 | A |
5944495 | Jacobsen et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5944684 | Roberts et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5965433 | Gardetto et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5989423 | Kamen et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6007310 | Jacobsen et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6017194 | North, Jr. | Jan 2000 | A |
6036668 | Mathis | Mar 2000 | A |
6041801 | Gray et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044691 | Kenley et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6065941 | Gray et al. | May 2000 | A |
6126403 | Yamada | Oct 2000 | A |
6129699 | Haight et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6165154 | Gray et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6208107 | Maske et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210361 | Kamen et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223130 | Gray et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6228047 | Dadson | May 2001 | B1 |
6231320 | Lawless et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6234991 | Gorsuch | May 2001 | B1 |
6234997 | Kamen et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6245039 | Brugger et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6248093 | Moberg | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254567 | Treu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270673 | Belt et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6280408 | Sipin | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283719 | Frantz et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6302653 | Bryant | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306036 | Burns et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6327895 | Jeppsson et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6343614 | Gray et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6364857 | Gray et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6382923 | Gray | May 2002 | B1 |
6416293 | Bouchard et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6484383 | Herklotz | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6491656 | Morris | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6491658 | Miura et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6497676 | Childers et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6503062 | Gray et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6595948 | Suzuki et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6542761 | Jahn et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6666842 | Sakai | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6672841 | Herklotz et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6743201 | Dönig | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6752172 | Lauer | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6764761 | Eu et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6766259 | Padgett et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6814547 | Childers | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6846161 | Kline et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6939111 | Huitt et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6948918 | Hansen | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6949079 | Westberg et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6953323 | Childers et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7004924 | Brugger et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7033539 | Krensky et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7040142 | Burbank | May 2006 | B2 |
7107837 | Lauman et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7115228 | Lundtveit et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7153286 | Busby et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7175606 | Bowman, Jr. et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7500962 | Childers et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7815595 | Busby et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7988686 | Beden et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8070709 | Childers | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8900174 | Childers | Dec 2014 | B2 |
20010018937 | Nemoto | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010034502 | Moberg et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020041825 | Scheunert et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020045851 | Suzuki et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020062109 | Lauer | May 2002 | A1 |
20020077598 | Yap et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020104800 | Collins et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030217961 | Hopping | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220606 | Busby et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220607 | Busby et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040019313 | Childers et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20050118038 | Gray et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20090216211 | Beden et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1226740 | Oct 1966 | DE |
19837667 | Mar 2000 | DE |
19919572 | Nov 2000 | DE |
19929572 | Nov 2000 | DE |
10034711 | Feb 2002 | DE |
10039196 | Feb 2002 | DE |
10042324 | Feb 2002 | DE |
10053441 | May 2002 | DE |
10157924 | Jun 2003 | DE |
10224750 | Dec 2003 | DE |
0 028 371 | May 1981 | EP |
0 033 096 | Aug 1981 | EP |
0 052 004 | May 1982 | EP |
0 097 432 | Jan 1984 | EP |
0 157 024 | Oct 1985 | EP |
0 206 195 | Dec 1986 | EP |
0 248 632 | Dec 1987 | EP |
0 319 272 | Jun 1989 | EP |
0 402 505 | Dec 1990 | EP |
0410125 | Jan 1991 | EP |
0 660 725 | Jul 1995 | EP |
0947814 | Oct 1999 | EP |
0956876 | Nov 1999 | EP |
0957954 | May 2003 | EP |
1314443 | May 2003 | EP |
1403519 | Mar 2004 | EP |
1546556 | Dec 2006 | EP |
1754890 | Feb 2007 | EP |
1 326 236 | Aug 1973 | GB |
H03-96850 | Oct 1991 | JP |
08-164201 | Jun 1996 | JP |
08164201 | Jun 1996 | JP |
09-501862 | Feb 1997 | JP |
2006-503598 | Feb 2006 | JP |
1201264 | Oct 2001 | PT |
8504813 | Nov 1985 | WO |
8601115 | Feb 1986 | WO |
8705223 | Sep 1987 | WO |
8901795 | Mar 1989 | WO |
9013795 | Nov 1990 | WO |
9420158 | Sep 1994 | WO |
WO9535124 | Dec 1995 | WO |
9822167 | May 1998 | WO |
WO0117606 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO03061733 | Jul 2003 | WO |
03099355 | Dec 2003 | WO |
2004029457 | Apr 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bergstrom et al., An Automated Apparatus for Peritoneal Dialysis with Volumetric Fluid Balance Measurement, reprinted from Dialysis & Transplantation, Jun./Jul. 1976. |
Bran & Luebbe GmbH, Diaphragm Metering Pumps, Chem. Eng'g Progress, Apr. 1987, at 18-24. |
Brochure entitled Fresenius Delivers 90/2 Peritoneal Therapy Cycler (Apr. 2001). |
Brochure entitled, AP Hauni: Automatisches Peritonealdialyse-Great (1970). |
Brochure entitled, For Volume Measurement, Temperature Control and Cycling of Dialysing Fluid, Peritoneal Dialyser PD700, 1970. |
Brochure entitled, Peritoneal Dialyser PD700, May 1979. |
Brochure entitled, SIF 901 Perugia, admitted prior art. |
Defendants' Final Invalidity Contentions for U.S. Pat. No. 6,814,547, Baxter Healthcare Corporation v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Case No. C 07-01359 PJH (JL), filed Apr. 1, 2009. |
Defendants' L.P.R. 2.3 Initial Non-Infringement and Invalidity Contentions (w/Exhibits). |
Defendants' L.P.R. 3.1 Final Invalidity Contentions. |
Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions for U.S. Pat. No. 6,814,547, Baxter Healthcare Corporation v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Case No. C 07-01359 PJH (JL), filed Jan. 31, 2008. |
Document entitled 90/2 Cycler Software, Version 3.96 (Jan. 24, 1992). |
Drukker et al., Replacement of Renal Function by Dialysis, 2nd Ed., Ch. 21, 1983. |
Elsevier Science Ltd., Air-Operated Diaphragm Pumps, World Pumps, Jan. 1996, at 38. |
Exhibit 1 to Defendants' L.P.R. 3.1 Final Invalidity Contentions. |
Exhibit 2 to Defendants' L.P.R. 3.1 Final Invalidity Contentions. |
Exhibit 3 to Defendants' L.P.R. 3.1 Final Invalidity Contentious. |
Exhibit 4 to Defendants' L.P.R. 3.1 Final Invalidity Contentions. |
Expert Witness Report of Ronald J. Adrian Regarding Lack of Written Description, Lack of Enablement, and Indefiniteness of the Asserted Claim (Claim 12) of U.S. Pat. No. 6,814,547, Apr. 24, 2009. |
Fresenius Delivers 90/2 Peritoneal Therapy Cycler (on information and belief, on sale in United States by 1991). |
Fresenius Freedom Cycler Operating Instructions, admitted prior art. |
Fresenius Medical Care Acute Dialysis Machine Operating Instructions for acu-men, Software Version 1.0. |
Fresenius Medical Care Operating Instructions for sleep-safeTM, Software Version 1.0, Part No. 677 805 1. |
Fresenius Medical Care Sleep-Safe Communicating Therapy. |
Fresenius Medical Care Sleep-Safe Product Range. |
Fresenius Medical Care Slide Presentation for sleep-safeTM. |
Fresenius Medical Care Technical Manual for sleep-safeTM, Part No. 677 807 1. |
Fresenius USA/Delmed 90/2 Peritoneal Dialysis System Operators Manual, dated Feb. 6, 1991. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2004/035644 dated Jun. 6, 2005. |
Japanese Office Action dated Feb. 1, 2013 for corresponding Japanese Appin. No. 2010-119922. |
Memorandum of Donald X. Vaccarino entitled 90/2 History File (1991-1992). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/155,754 dated Sep. 11, 2003. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/155,754 dated Mar. 24, 2004. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/614,850 dated May 13, 2009. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/614,850 dated Mar. 18, 2010. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/614,858 dated May 13, 2010. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/617,527 dated Nov. 24, 2008. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/617,527 dated May 5, 2009. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/617,527 dated Aug. 12, 2009. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/617,527 dated Jan. 21, 2010. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/617,527 dated Jul. 16, 2010. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/446,068 dated May 12, 2006. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/446,068 dated Nov. 7, 2006. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/446,068 dated Sep. 7, 2007. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/446,068 dated Feb. 28, 2008. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/446,068 dated Jul. 31, 2008. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/446,068 dated Nov. 14, 2008. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/773,787 dated Jul. 28, 2010. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/903,902 dated Jul. 6, 2011. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/903,887 dated Jul. 6, 2011. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/773,148 dated May 17, 2010. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/773,148 dated Feb. 7, 2011. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/408,432 dated Mar. 3, 2011. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/617,543 dated Sep. 24, 2007. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/617,543 dated May 30, 2008. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/617,543 dated Oct. 20, 2008. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/617,543 dated Jul. 22, 2009. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/987,738 dated Apr. 29, 2011. |
Operating Instructions, Peritoneal Dialyser PD700, for Ser. No. 300. |
Operator's Instructions, Fresenius 90/2 Peritoneal Therapy Cycler (Rev. C. copyright 1991-2000). |
Operator Manual, Fresenius Newton IQ TM Cycler, pp. 27 to 34. |
PD700 Peritoneal Dialyser Users Hand-book, Dec. 1977. |
Peritoneal Dialyser PD700 Instruction Manual, admitted prior art. |
Peritoneal Dialyser PD700 Service Manual, Jun. 1977. |
Prior practices, Step 4 from Baxter's Ultra Set Aseptic Exchange Procedure; figures from Pac Xtra Operator's Manual; figure from Fresenius Delmed 90/2 APD Cycler; priming instructions from HomeChoice APD Patent at Home Guide; JMS PD Mini Patent Line Priming Procedure; Gambro Serena cycler pictures disposable set diagram; and figure of Easy Care ADP cycler. |
Technical Note, PD700 Peritoneal Dialyser, Jan. 29, 1979. |
Translation of brochure entitled, SIF 901 Perugia, admitted prior art. |
Translation Certificate for translation of brochure entitled, SIF 901 Perugia, admitted prior art. |
W.M. Phillips, J.A. Brighton & W.S. Pierce, Artificial Heart Evaluation Using Flow Visualization Techniques, published in Transactions: American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, vol. XVIII (1972). |
Ronco et al., “Evolution of Machines for Automated Peritoneal Dialysis”, Technical Aspects and Solutions for ADP. |
Sleep-safeTM Technical Manual, Part No. 6778071, 2nd edition, Dec. 2001. |
Japanese Office Action dated Oct. 28, 2013 for related Japanese Appin. No. 2006-538216. |
Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 17, 2013 in corresponding European Patent Application No. 11004145.6. |
Japanese Office Action dated Mar. 18, 2014, corresponding to Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-096254. |
Fresenius Freedom Cycler Operating Instructions. Bates range FRES2078159-FRES2078220. Admitted prior art. |
Brochure entitled SIF 901 Perugia. Bates range FRES068828-833. Admitted prior art. |
Peritoneal Dialyser PD700 Instruction Manual. Bates range FRES2070909-FRES2070926. Admitted prior art. |
Operator Manual, Fresenius NewIQ TM Cycler, pp. 27-34. Admitted prior art. |
Prior practices, Step 4 from Baxter's Ultra Set Aseptic Exchange Procedure; figures from Pac Xtra Operator's Manual; figure from Fresenius Delmed 90/2 APD Cycler; priming instructions from HomeChoice APD Patent at Home Guide; JMS PO Mini Patent Line Priming Procedure; Gambro Serena cycler pictures disposable set diagram; and figure of Easy Care ADP cycler. 7 pages. Admitted prior art. |
Translation of brochure entitled, SIF 901 Perugia and Translation Certificate for translation of brochure entitled, SIF 901 Perugia. Bates Nos. FRES068842-43. Admitted prior art. |
Operating Instructions, Peritoneal Dialyser PD700, for Ser. No. 300, 1979. Bates range FRES2070933-934. D Admitted prior art. |
EP Office Action—EP Appl. No. 11 004 145.6-1651 dated Oct. 21, 2014, 5 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150082867 A1 | Mar 2015 | US | |
20180264185 A9 | Sep 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60515815 | Oct 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13373909 | Dec 2011 | US |
Child | 14553104 | US | |
Parent | 10506738 | Sep 2004 | US |
Child | 13373909 | US | |
Parent | 10975733 | Oct 2004 | US |
Child | 10506738 | US |