This application claims the priority of European Patent Application, Serial No. 14198232.2, filed Dec. 16, 2014, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d), the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety as if fully set forth herein.
The present invention relates to an electric machine.
The following discussion of related art is provided to assist the reader in understanding the advantages of the invention, and is not to be construed as an admission that this related art is prior art to this invention.
Permanently magnetically excited electric machines are increasingly of interest because of their very reliability and operation with a high degree of efficiency. The permanently excited electric machines can be operated as a motor or as a generator. The permanently magnetically excited electric machine can be used for example as a servomotor. Servomotors have a large number of fields of application. They are often used in industrial facilities. They may also be used in diverse machines, for example in machine tools, packaging machines or industrial robots.
It would be desirable and advantageous to provide an improved electric machine to obviate prior art shortcomings and to keep torque ripple particularly low.
According to one aspect of the present invention, an electric machine includes a stator having 48 grooves and 48 tooth coils, and a rotor interacting with the stator, said rotor having eight magnetic poles along an external circumference of the rotor in an annular arrangement, with adjacent magnetic poles defining angular distances defined successively at 41.25°, 39.75°, 41.25°, 57.75°, 41.25°, 39.75°, 41.25° and 57.75°, with the angular distances having a tolerance range of 0.4°, wherein the electric machine has a pole arc between 0.6 and 0.7.
In accordance with the present invention, the magnetic poles are arranged on the circumference of the rotor with different relative position angles. The effect of different position angles or angular distances is such that the distances, i.e. the lengths of an arc of a circle, between two magnetic poles respectively that are adjacent in the circumferential direction are different so long as the values of the angular distances are not identical. The magnets can be arranged for example in an annular arrangement such that their center point is intersected by a hypothetical straight line which, starting from a center point of the rotor, extends to the magnetic center point, wherein a further hypothetical straight line, which likewise runs through the center point of a further adjacent magnet, also starting from the rotor center point, extends to this straight line at a respective angular distance.
To ensure clarity, it is necessary to establish the definition of several important terms and expressions that will be used throughout this disclosure.
The term “magnetic poles” relates to permanent magnets, it being possible for the magnetic poles to have different polarities.
The term “angular distance” relates to a distance between two straight lines, wherein, starting from the center point of the rotor (rotor axis), the straight lines extend radially outwards to the center point of the magnetic poles. The angular distance is measured in degrees, such as e.g. 45°.
The term “tolerance range” relates to a positive or negative value of a deviation from the respective value of the angular distance between the respectively adjacent magnetic poles. The sum of all eight values for the angular distances between the magnetic poles is 360°, however. The appropriate arrangement of the magnetic poles on the circumference of the rotor results in the advantage that disruptive effects, such as for example varying torques, are reduced.
The rotor is arranged in the stator having 48 grooves and 48 tooth coils. In other words, a stator having 48 grooves and 48 tooth coils is associated to the rotor. The electric machine can have a pole arc between 0.6 and 0.7.
The term “pole arc” relates to a ratio of the angle of projection of the magnet onto the stator bore to the pole angle. In other words, the pole arc results from the ratio of the magnetic angle to the pole angle. The magnetic angle can be determined in that, starting from two magnetic edges, i.e. a first and a second edge of a magnet, wherein the second edge opposes the first edge in the circumferential direction, the line of the magnetic edge is hypothetically lengthened in the direction of the inner diameter of the stator bore, so one point of intersection respectively with the inner circle of the stator bore results for one lengthened magnetic edge line respectively of the same magnet and, starting from the rotor center point, two straight lines are guided to the points of intersection.
The magnetic angle corresponds to the angle between these two straight lines. The horizontal distance between the magnetic edges or the first and second edges of the magnet represents the magnet width. The pole angle can be calculated with the aid of the formula pole angle=ap=360°/(2*p) The pole angle is given in degrees, like the magnetic angle. In the denominator of the above-described formula the variable p represents the number of pole pairs or the pole pair number which is multiplied by 2. For example, in an 8-pole electric machine, the pole pair number corresponds to the value 4. Therefore a pole angle ap of 45° results for example for an 8-pole electric machine.
According to another advantageous feature of the present invention, the magnetic poles can be formed as segment magnets. Segment magnets are characterized in that their bottom side, i.e. the face which rests on the laminated core of the rotor, and the top side, i.e. the face that opposes the bottom side, are curved in such a way that their curvatures match the curvature of the circle with the same radial distance from the axis of rotation in each case. This has the advantage that a narrow and uniform air gap can be enabled between magnetic pole surface and stator inner face or pole face, while nevertheless ensuring a firm fit on the laminated core.
According to another advantageous feature of the present invention, flow barriers can extend axially from a first axial end of the rotor to an opposing second axial end of the rotor, said flow barriers being arranged radially inwardly and centrally at a predefined distance from the magnetic poles.
The term “inwardly” relates to the flow barriers being arranged under the magnetic poles, as viewed in the direction of the rotor center point.
The term “flow barriers” relates to cavities which can have for example a cylindrical form. This has the advantage that the rotor is lighter and therefore has a particularly low weight. Furthermore, the presence of the flow barriers means that no magnetic short circuits occur. Both of these factors mean that particularly low losses occur during operation of the electric machine.
According to another advantageous feature of the present invention, at least one further annular arrangement can be provided and include eight magnetic poles, wherein the magnetic poles of the annular arrangements are arranged in axial alignment.
The term “axially aligned” relates to an arrangement of the magnetic poles along a line parallel to the axis of rotation. The magnetic poles can be provided in a straight line on the rotor due to this avoidance of graduating or slanting measures of magnetic poles on the rotor. This has the advantage that magnetization on the rotor is possible with straight magnetization yokes. This simplifies the production engineering and the number of means of production.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will be more readily apparent upon reading the following description of currently preferred exemplified embodiments of the invention with reference to the accompanying drawing, in which:
Throughout all the figures, same or corresponding elements may generally be indicated by same reference numerals. These depicted embodiments are to be understood as illustrative of the invention and not as limiting in any way. It should also be understood that the figures are not necessarily to scale and that the embodiments are sometimes illustrated by graphic symbols, phantom lines, diagrammatic representations and fragmentary views. In certain instances, details which are not necessary for an understanding of the present invention or which render other details difficult to perceive may have been omitted.
The exemplary embodiments described below are preferred embodiments of the invention. However, in the exemplary embodiments the described components of the embodiment each represent individual features of the invention which should be considered independently of each other and which also each develop the invention independently of each other and therefore may also be regarded individually, or in one of the illustrated combinations, as a component of the invention. Furthermore, the described embodiments may also be supplemented by further features of the invention that have already been described.
Turning now to the drawing, and in particular to
Inside the stator 14, there is a rotor 16 which is connected in fixed rotative engagement to a shaft 12. The shaft 12 is rotatable about the axis of rotation A and mounted in the stator 14.
Between respectively adjacent magnetic poles 18, there are angular distances a1 to a8, wherein the angular distances are successively 41.25°, 39.75°, 41.25°, 57.75°, 41.25°, 39.75°, 41.25° and 57.75°. The respective angular distances a1 to a8 can have a tolerance range 0.4°. Still, the sum of all angular distances is always 360°. The rotor 16 has a hole number of 2. The magnetic poles 18 are alternately north and south poles. The stator 14 having 48 grooves 20 and 48 tooth coils is allocated to the rotor 16.
Overall a permanently magnetically excited machine having rotated magnetic poles is realized. This relates to a 3-phase, 8-pole and 48-groove electric machine having non-slanted stator, permanent magnetic excitation and simple rotor design. The torque ripple is therefore kept low by simple measures, so manufacturing costs are low.
The exemplary embodiment shows a combination of different position angles of the magnetic poles on the circumference of the motor with an associated pole arc (magnet width/pole pitch). By avoiding graduating and slanting measures on the motor, the magnets can be provided in a straight line on the rotor. Magnetization on the rotor is therefore possible with straight magnetization yokes. This simplifies production engineering and the number of means of production. The combination of partial pole arc and position angles produces the most pronounced technical effect. The position angles are produced by rotation of individual poles.
Due to the reduced torque ripple and the simple design of the rotor, electric machines having a rotor of this kind are primarily used in vehicle drives and industrial facilities and systems. The electric vehicle drives involve rail-bound vehicles, such as trams, trainsets, locomotives as well as electric cars, mining trucks and similarly applications in electric aircraft. In industrial facilities and systems, the reduced torque ripple and the simple design is primarily provided for machine tools and tool machining, as is the application of electric machines of this kind in industrial robots, packaging machines or logistics centers. There, the electric machine is primarily used as a servomotor which is particularly suitable due to its control of the angular position of the shaft of the electric machine and of the rotational speed and acceleration.
While the invention has been illustrated and described in connection with currently preferred embodiments shown and described in detail, it is not intended to be limited to the details shown since various modifications and structural changes may be made without departing in any way from the spirit and scope of the present invention. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to explain the principles of the invention and practical application to thereby enable a person skilled in the art to best utilize the invention and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
14198232 | Dec 2014 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4713569 | Schwartz | Dec 1987 | A |
6242837 | Matsunobu | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6483221 | Pawellek et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6628031 | Vollmer | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6768238 | Knauff et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6812612 | Schunk et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6858965 | Mueller et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6885187 | Duenisch et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6943467 | Potoradi et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7109624 | Yashiro | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7141905 | Vollmer | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7285883 | Bott et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7564158 | Huth et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7705507 | Vollmer | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7709984 | Braun et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7732967 | Vollmer et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7755315 | Bott et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7777373 | Bott et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7859160 | Vollmer | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7915777 | Vollmer | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7977826 | Vollmer et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8026640 | Bott et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8063517 | Bott et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8115360 | Vollmer | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8134273 | Vollmer et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8227951 | Grossmann et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8283815 | Vollmer | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8378541 | Vollmer | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8441158 | Vollmer | May 2013 | B2 |
8674560 | Budde et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8853894 | Fick et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8922072 | Bott et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9160206 | Potoradi et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
20060219880 | Braun et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070040466 | Vollmer | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070114861 | Bott et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070257566 | Vollmer | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070257575 | Vollmer | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080169718 | Schunk et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080185931 | Platen et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080289440 | Vollmer et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080315704 | Vollmer | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090009114 | Schunk et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090015080 | Vollmer et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090152959 | Vollmer | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090160283 | Vollmer et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090184602 | Braun et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090251013 | Vollmer et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090261679 | Sakai | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090302832 | Budde et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090315424 | Vollmer | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100000830 | Budde et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100013333 | Vollmer | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100133940 | Grossmann et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100264770 | Braun et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20120025654 | Bach et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20130127264 | Fick et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130147285 | Vollmer et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130193783 | Aoyama | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130241324 | Mader et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130241335 | Vollmer et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140042857 | Mader et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140070655 | Schneider et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140097782 | Vollmer | Apr 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
103 48 401 | May 2004 | DE |
103 03 848 | Aug 2004 | DE |
2 073 352 | Jun 2009 | EP |
WO 2004-070921 | Aug 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160172915 A1 | Jun 2016 | US |