Peroxide removal from drug delivery vehicle

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11083796
  • Patent Number
    11,083,796
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, August 15, 2019
    4 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 10, 2021
    2 years ago
Abstract
The present invention is related to methods for lowering peroxide levels in sucrose acetate isobutyrate formulations and to composition used in and formed by such methods.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to methods for reducing peroxide levels in non-polymeric preparations and to compositions used in and prepared by such methods.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Sucrose acetate isobutyrate (“SAIB”) is a hydrophobic liquid with limited water solubility. It is soluble in a large number of biocompatible solvents. SAIB has an unusual property—it undergoes a dramatic change in viscosity with small additions of heat or with the addition of solvents. It is a very viscous liquid, having a viscosity of approximately 3200 poise at 37° C. SAIB is produced by the controlled esterification of natural sugar (sucrose) with acetic and isobutyric anhydrides. SAIB metabolizes to sucrose, acetic acid and isobutyric acid.


SAIB is orally non-toxic and is currently used to stabilize emulsions in the food industry. In one example, SAIB is commonly found in the beverage industry, where it is used as a weighting agent to help stabilize the final beverage formula. Also, SAIB has been reported to be useful as a gelling system-type drug excipient that allows for sustained or controlled release of drugs. When in solution or in an emulsion, SAIB can be applied via injection or an aerosol spray. SAIB is compatible with cellulose esters and other polymers that can affect the rate of delivery of the substance. In one example, SAIB is the main ingredient for the SABER drug delivery system, which also consists of a pharmaceutically acceptable solvent.


Drug delivery systems, including SAIB delivery systems, are still confronted by various issues of drug instability, as such systems are considered for longer and longer drug delivery durations. Drug instability can occur via a number of factors, including denaturation, precipitation, oxidation, aggregation, and others. In particular, a number of excipients used to facilitate delivery and release of drugs have peroxides or are susceptible to the formation of peroxides, which may lead to oxidation of active ingredient in the formulation. In the example of SAIB, the presence of peroxides is deleterious to a drug incorporated in an SAIB drug formulation as the drug is likely to undergo oxidative degradation. Thus, in order to formulate any drug formulation based on SAIB that provides enough of a stable environment to facilitate the delivery of a drug, the peroxide levels must be reduced.


There is no known process for removal of peroxides from SAIB at present, despite availability of processes for the removal of peroxides from other materials such as polymers. Therefore, there still remains a need for a drug formulation of SAIB having improved properties to reduce the degradation of the drug therein.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An aspect of the present invention comprises methods of treating sucrose acetate isobutyrate (SAIB) formulations to be used as drug delivery vehicles comprising adding to the formulations an amount of bisulfite salt effective to substantially remove peroxides, the bisulfite salt comprising sodium metabisulfite, potassium metabisulfite, sodium bisulfite, or potassium bisulfite, or a mixture thereof.


In another aspect of the present invention, provided are drug delivery vehicles adapted to provide prolonged stability of a drug that is to be delivered in vivo comprising sucrose acetate isobutyrate having substantially reduced levels of peroxide, the drug delivery vehicle being treated with an amount of bisulfite salt effective to substantially reduce levels of peroxide in said drug delivery vehicle, the bisulfite salt comprising sodium metabisulfite, potassium metabisulfite, sodium bisulfite, or potassium bisulfite, or a combination thereof.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention is illustrated by way of example and is not intended to be limited by the accompanying figures.



FIG. 1 illustrates a bar graph of the results of Study I—Stability of omega-interferon in untreated SAIB.



FIG. 2 illustrates a bar graph of the results of Study IIa—Stability of omega-interferon in alumina treated SAIB.



FIG. 3 illustrates a bar graph of the results of Study IIb—Stability of omega-interferon in alumina treated SAIB.



FIG. 4 illustrates a bar graph of the results of Study III—Stability of omega-interferon in untreated SAIB.



FIG. 5 illustrates a bar graph of the results of Study VIb—Stability of omega-interferon in untreated SAIB.



FIG. 6 illustrates a bar graph of the results of Study VIa—Stability of omega-interferon in sodium metabisulfite treated SAIB.



FIG. 7 illustrates a bar graph that provides comparisons of oxidation of omega-IFN in sodium metabisulfite treated and untreated SAIB.



FIG. 8 illustrates an osmotically pump-driven implantable device, Duros® being an example, that facilitates in vivo delivery of an active agent in an SAIB vehicle.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS

In an aspect of the present invention, provided are methods of treating sucrose acetate isobutyrate formulations (SAID) that are to be used as drug delivery vehicles comprising adding an amount of a bisulfite salt effective for substantially removing peroxide from the formulations, the bisulfite salt comprising sodium metabisulfite, potassium metabisulfite, sodium bisulfite, or potassium bisulfite, or a combination thereof. Preferably, the bisulfite salt is sodium metabisulfite. A ratio ranging from about 1:1 to about 1:4 (weight:volume) SAIB:aqueous solution of bisulfite salt (“aqueous bisulfite salt”) can be used. Preferably, the bisulfite salt is a metabisulfite salt. In some embodiments, the bisulfite salt is preferably sodium metabisulfite. Preferably, the ratio of the aqueous bisulfite salt to SAIB is 1:1. In one example, to purify 1 kg of SAID, a volume of sodium metabisulfite solution can be made up to 1 liter, and an approximate proportion of 1:1 of SAIB:aqueous sodium metabisulfite was used. The aqueous bisulfite salt in SAID can be from about 0.1% weight to volume of water (w/v) to about 50% w/v; preferably, from about 0.5% w/v to about 30% w/v. In some embodiments, the aqueous bisulfite salt is preferably from about 1% w/v to about 15% w/v. In some embodiments, the aqueous bisulfite salt is about 5% w/v solution in water.


The method removes peroxide to a level that is at least less than 50% of the levels before the method, or starting levels, and, preferably, less than 20% of the starting levels. In some embodiments, peroxide is removed to less than 10% of the starting levels. While in some embodiments, the method removes peroxide to a level that is less than 5% of the starting levels. Furthermore, the method can remove peroxide so that the resulting SAIB formulation contains peroxide in amounts less than 20 ppm, and, preferably, less than 10 ppm. In some embodiments, the method removes peroxide to result in an SAIB formulation containing less than 5 ppm. In some embodiments, the resulting SAIB formulation from this method can serve as a drug delivery vehicle for use with a medical delivery device, including a drug eluting stent, a catheter, or other drug delivery implants. In one example, the SAIB formulation can be loaded into an osmotically pump-driven implantable device of the type disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,395,292, for example. Preferably, the osmotically pump-driven implantable device is a Duros® device (Alza Corporation, Mountain View, Calif.). In other embodiments, the SAIB formulation can serve as a drug depot for drug delivery.


In some embodiments, the step of adding the bisulfite salt comprises mixing a solution of the bisulfite salt with the sucrose acetate isobutyrate formulation. The SAIB formulation can be further comprised of a cosolvent, which can be selected from a number of solvents including pharmaceutically acceptable solvents, e.g., hexane, ethyl acetate, ethanol, benzyl benzoate, N-methyl pyrrolidone, and iso-propyl alcohol, among others. Preferably, the cosolvent is hexane or ethyl acetate. In some embodiments, the methods further comprise vacuum treating the formulation to remove the cosolvent. Also, some embodiments comprise the additional step of removing bisulfite salt from the formulation. This removal step comprises washing the formulation with water to remove the bisulfite salt. In the embodiments that incorporate the washing step, a further step of drying the formulation over magnesium sulfate can be utilized to remove the water. Alternatively, calcium chloride anhydrous, calcium sulfate anhydrous, activated silica gel, phosphorous pentoxide, or drying under vacuum, or a combination thereof can be used to also remove the water. In alternative embodiments, glycerin can be used to wash the bisulfite-added formulation to remove the bisulfite salt. Afterwards, residual glycerin can be removed by washing with water and then drying to remove water.


In some aspects of the present invention, the methods of substantially removing peroxide from a sucrose acetate isobutyrate formulation (SAW) comprising the steps of adding the aqueous bisulfite salt, washing the formulation, and drying the formulation are repeated at least once. The steps can be repeated to further reduce the levels of peroxide in the SAIB formulation.


In another aspect, the present invention includes a drug delivery vehicle comprising SAW that provides for prolonged stability of a drug that is to be delivered by maintaining substantially reduced levels of peroxide, the drug delivery vehicle being treated with sodium metabisulfite. The prolonged stability comprises reduced oxidation, deamidation, or aggregation, e.g., dimerization, of the drug over extended periods of time in which drug is within environment of delivery vehicle. Preferably the prolonged stability is reduced oxidation. The extended periods of time can be periods from about one week to a few months, and up to about a year. Preferably, the prolonged stability is evidenced by significant improvements in oxidation, deamidation, or aggregation levels of the drug when the delivery vehicle has been treated with a bisulfite salt versus untreated delivery vehicle. In some preferred embodiments, the prolonged stability is characterized as about 50% less oxidation, about 33% less deamidation, or about 75% less dimerization as compared to untreated delivery vehicles. The drug can be selected from any known and desired biomolecular material that can act as therapeutics and other therapeutic active agents that are susceptible to oxidative degradation. As it is used herein, the term “biomolecular material” refers to peptides, polypeptides, proteins, nucleic acids, viruses, antibodies, small molecules susceptible to oxidation, and any other naturally derived, synthetically produced, or recombinantly produced active agent that includes nucleic or amino acid. In some embodiments, for example, drugs can be selected from among the following: a steroid, MAIDS, peptides, proteins such as growth factors or hormones, anti-tumor agents, antibiotics, analgesics, local anesthetics, antiviral agents, antipsychotics, anticoagulants, oligonucleotides for gene therapy, active small molecules, and others.


As used herein, the term “removing” and all variations thereof, refer to decreasing by any measurable degree the level of peroxide present in a drug formulation. The term “substantially removing” is used herein to describe a dramatic decrease in the level of peroxide present in a drug formulation, such as SAW formulation. The dramatic decrease is at least 50% of original levels (levels before treatment) and in some instances is 10% of original levels. In preferred aspects of the present invention, the “substantial removal” describes a decrease to less than 5% of original levels.


As used herein, the term “drug delivery vehicle” or “delivery vehicle” refers to a formulation that is biocompatible and used to carry a drug without reacting with the same drug. Also, the vehicle does not alter or minimally alters the activity of the drug. Furthermore, the vehicle allows for the transport of the drug in vivo and eventual delivery of the drug to a biological site for therapeutic effect.


As used herein, the term “prolonged stability” is used to refer to the stabilizing effect of the drug delivery vehicles of the present invention on the carried drug. Prolonged stability can be evidenced by significant improvements in oxidation, deamidation, or aggregation of the drug over extended periods of time.


EXAMPLES

Different approaches were investigated for removal of peroxides from SA113, as indicated in Table 1.


Preparation of Suspension


Each of the experiments involved protein particles consisting of omega-interferon, which were suspended in SAIB at a particle loading of either 4% or 10% by weight. The suspensions were prepared in a dry box under nitrogen at 45° C. The suspension was mixed for 15 minutes while maintaining the temperature. Suspension mixing was performed by hand. Aliquots from the prepared suspensions were transferred to clear crimp-top glass vials and sealed under nitrogen. Each aliquot contained at least six milligrams of protein to allow for stability testing in triplicate. These samples were stored in an oven at 40° C. Samples were withdrawn at regular intervals (as indicated in Table 1) and analyzed for omega-interferon content and purity was assessed using reverse phase I-IPLC and size exclusion chromatography.


Size Exclusion Chromatography


Size exclusion chromatography (SEC) was used to monitor the omega-interferon content and purity in the formulations. The percentages of monomer and dimer in the formulation were quantified using SEC. The stability of omega-interferon was judged by using a stability indicating chromatographic technique based on reverse phase HPLC (rp-HPLC). This technique was used to monitor the oxidation, deamidation and formation of an unknown species of omega-interferon in the formulations. The peroxide content of the vehicle was determined using EP 2002, 2.5.5 (Method A with auto titration), See Extra Pharmacopoeia, 2002 Ed. Content and purity assay of omega-interferon by size exclusion chromatography (SEC).


Reverse Phase High Performance Liquid Chromatography


Purity assay and identity of omega-interferon recombinant in suspension systems by reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography (rp-HPLC).


The stability of omega-interferon was monitored in two different lots of untreated SAIB (as received) and in treated SAID (removal of peroxides), when treatment was applied.


The studies are outlined below:

  • Study I: Stability in untreated SAIB (lot #TD1030507) for 2 weeks
  • Study IIa: Treatment of SAIB (lot #TD1030507) with neutral alumina by heating and stability in this treated SAIB for 4 weeks
  • Study Treatment of SAIB (lot #TD1030507) with neutral alumina in presence of ethanol and stability in this treated SAIB for 4 weeks
  • Study III: Stability in untreated SAIB (lot #TD2032663) for 2 weeks
  • Study IV: Treatment of SAIB (lot #TD2032663) with basic alumina by heating
  • Study V: Treatment of SAIB (lot #TD2032663) with 10% aqueous methionine solution by heating
  • Study VIa: Treatment of SAIB (lot #TD2032663) with 5% aqueous solution of sodium metabisulfite and stability in treated SAIB for 8 weeks
  • Study VIb: Stability in untreated SAIB (lot #TD2032663) for 8 weeks









TABLE 1







Details about stability studies of omega-interferon in SAIB












Study
SALB
Treatment
Particle
Time



#
(Lot #)

loading
points
Tests





I
TD1030507
Untreated
 4%
0, 4, 7,
SEC,






14 days
RP-HPLC


IIa
TD1030507
Treated with neutral
10%
0, 2,
SEC,




alumina by heating

4 weeks
RP-HPLC


IIb
TD1030507
Treated with neutral
10%
0, 2,
SEC,




alumina using

4 weeks
RP-HPLC




ethanol





III
TD2032663
Untreated
10%
0, 1,
SEC,






2 weeks
RP-HPLC


IV
TD2032663
Treated with basic
NA
NA
NA




alumina by heating





V
TD2032663
Treated with 10%
NA
NA
NA




aqueous solution







of methionine





VIa
TD2032663
Treated with hexane
10%
0, 1, 2, 4,
SEC,




and sodium

8 weeks
RP-HPLC




metabisulfite





VIb
TD2032663
Untreated
10%
0, 1, 2, 4,
SEC,






8 weeks
RP-HPLC










Materials and Equipment


The following tables, Table 2 and Table 3, provide a list of materials and equipment that can be utilized to perform the experiments described, below.









TABLE 2





List of materials


Materials







Spray dried omega-interferon particles


SAM, Eastman Chemical Company


Aluminum oxide (Powder)


Ethanol, absolute, 200 proof, AAPER


Aluminum oxide, basic, standard activity I,


50-200 μm, Sorbent Technologies


Aluminum oxide, basic, Super I,


50-200 μm, Sorbent Technologies


Methionine, USP, Ph Eur, JP
















TABLE 3





List of equipment


Equipment







Branson Ultrasonic Cleaner Model 2510


VAC Dry Box


Mettler AT261 Delta Range Balance


Mettler P33000 Balance


Sartorius Genius Electronic Analytical Balance


Hot plate


Oven (40° C.)


Millipore filter, white hydrophilic, Durapore Disc, SLVP, 25 mm, 5 μm


PTFE membrane filter, 0.2 μm, Titan filtration systems









Example 1
Study I: Stability in Untreated SAIB (lot #TD1030507) for 2 Weeks








TABLE 4





Stability of omega-interferon in untreated SAIB (lot #:


1030507)—Study 1

















Analysis by RP-HPLC (n = 3)**












Initial (t = 0)






(AR 48452)






(protein
4 days
7 days
14 days



particles)***
AR48424
AR48562
AR48450





Assay (%)
NA
0.59* (0.02)
0.72 (0.00)
 0.68 (0.00)


% omega-IFN
93.37 (0.40) 
89.06 (0.46)
87.65 (0.06) 
87.67 (0.26)


Purity






% Oxidized
 2.8 (0.71)
 7.21 (0.88)
7.79 (1.09)
 8.31 (0.10)


% Deamidated
 0.8 (0.02)
 1.21 (0.00)
1.28 (0.01)
 1.63 (0.03)


% Unknown
3.03 (0.62)
 2.25 (0.66)
3.27 (0.79)
 2.39 (0.38)












Analysis by SEC (n = 3)**












Initial






(AR 48452)






(protein
4 days
7 days
14 days



particles)***
AR48424
AR48562
AR48450





% Monomer
100.00 (0.00) 
99.96 (0.01)
99.60 (0.02) 
99.40 (0.00)


% Dimer
ND
 0.04 (0.00)
0.38 (0.01)
 0.58 (0.02)


Unknown
ND
ND
0.01 (0.00)
 0.01 (0.01)





ND = Not detected,


*sampled by scraping container walls, so values might not be representative of the bulk


**standard deviation in parenthesis;


***protein particles − t = 0 for suspension






The preliminary stability study of omega interferon in untreated SAIB (lot #TD1030507, peroxide value—71.4 ppm) was over 2 weeks. The results indicated that up to 8.31% of omega-interferon was oxidized in two weeks, which corresponds to an increase of 5.51% with respect to particles (2.8% oxidation at t=0). See Table 4, FIG. 1. Furthermore, a small increase occurred in the percentage of deamidated form (+0.83%) of omega-interferon and the dimer (+0.58%). The high level of oxidation can be attributed to the high peroxide content of SAIB.


Example 2
Study IIa and IIb: Stability of SAIB (lot #TD1030507) Treated with Neutral Alumina with Heating or Neutral Alumina in Presence of Ethanol for 4 Weeks

Treatment of SAIB with Neutral Alumina with Heating


SAIB was heated to 75° C. Alumina (15% w/w) was added to the heated SAW. The mixture was stirred for 40 minutes and filtered though a 5.0 μm filter at 75° C. The treated SAIB was then collected, sampled for peroxide testing, and used for preparation of suspension for stability testing.


Treatment of SAIB with Neutral Alumina in Presence of Ethanol


SAIB was mixed with 15% absolute ethanol to reduce the viscosity. Basic alumina (15% w/w) was added to the SAIB containing ethanol. The resulting mixture was stirred for 1 hour and filtered though a 0.2 μm filter. The filtered SAIB was placed overnight under vacuum at 60° C. to remove the ethanol. This treated SAIB was then collected, sampled for peroxide testing, and used for preparation of suspension for stability testing.









TABLE 5







Stability of omega-interferon in alumina treated SAIB ((lot #:


1030507)—Studies IIa and IIb












Initial (t = 0)






(protein
Initial (t = 0)
2 weeks
1 month



particles)
AR 48570
AR 48572
AR 48565










SAIB treated with neutral alumina by heating—Study IIa












Analysis by RP-HPLC (n = 3)**











Assay (%)
NA
 1.68 (0.01)
 1.70 (0.00)
 1.72 (0.01)


% omega-IFN
 89.08 (0.56)
 87.56 (0.47)
83.90 (0.15)
82.97 (0.50)


Purity






% Oxidized
 1.72 (0.12)
 3.45 (0.06)
 6.85 (0.14)
 7.39 (0.21)


% Deamidated
 1.49 (0.01)
 1.46 (0.03)
 1.84 (0.03)
 2.42 (0.05)


% Unknown
 7.70 (0.45)
 7.52 (0.45)
 7.41 (0.01)
 7.22 (0.46)









Analysis by SEC (n = 3)**











% Monomer
100.00 (0.00)
100.00 (0.00)
99.89 (0.01)
99.50 (0.02)


% Dimer
trace
0.00
 0.11 (0.01)
 0.50 (0.02)


Unknown
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00










SAIB treated with neutral alumina using ethanol—Study IIb












Analysis by RP-HPLC (n = 3)**











Assay (%)
NA
 1.66 (0.02)
 1.70 (0.01)
 1.70 (0.00)


% omega-IFN
 89.08 (0.56)
 88.12 (0.49)
83.76 (0.09)
82.65 (0.19)


Purity






% Oxidized
 1.72 (0.12)
 3.08 (0.07)
 6.98 (0.12)
 7.42 (0.10)


% Deamidated
 1.49 (0.01)
 1.47 (0.01)
 1.88 (0.02)
 2.45 (0.09)


% Unknown
 7.70 (0.45)
 7.32 (0.48)
 7.38 (0.02)
 7.48 (0.05)









Analysis by SEC (n = 3)**











% Monomer
100.00 (0.00)
100.00 (0.00)
99.87 (0.01)
99.43 (0.02)


% Dimer
trace
0.00
 0.13 (0.01)
0.57 (0.02)


Unknown
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00





**standard deviation in parenthesis






The stability of omega-interferon in alumina treated SAIB was tested. After one month in the neutral alumina treated SAIB (Study IIa and IIb), oxidation of omega-interferon increased by about 5.7% for both IIa and IIb. This indicates that alumina treatment of SAIB did not improve the stability of omega-interferon in SAIB. See Table 5. In addition, this analysis is also reflected in the high peroxide content of alumina treated SAIB (66.3 and 62.9 ppm, respectively). Treatment with neutral alumina was not effective in decreasing peroxide content.


Example 3
Study III: Stability in Untreated SAIB (lot #TD2032663) for 2 Weeks








TABLE 6







Stability of omega-interferon in untreated SAIB


((lot #: 2032663)—Study III












Initial (t = 0)






(AR 48217)
Initial





(protein
(t = 0)
1 week
2 weeks



particles)
AR 49640
AR 49644
AR 49647












Analysis by RP-HPLC (n = 3)**











Assay (%)
NA
 1.69 (0.01)
 1.70 (0.00)
 1.68 (0.01)


% omega-IFN
88.98 (0.09)
88.21 (0.03)
84.95 (0.58)
83.71 (0.48)


Purity






% Oxidized
 1.63 (0.04)
 3.20 (0.03)
 6.39 (0.05)
 7.21 (0.10)


% Deamidated
 1.45 (0.01)
 1.66 (0.01)
 1.45 (0.40)
 1.84 (0.03)


% Unknown
 7.94 (0.12)
 6.93 (0.04)
 7.22 (0.45)
 7.24 (0.45)









Analysis by SEC (n = 3)**











% Monomer
99.93 (0.01)
99.83 (0.02)
99.75 (0.01)
99.51 (0.01)


% Dimer
 0.07 (0.01)
 0.17 (0.02)
 0.25 (0.01)
 0.49 (0.01)


Unknown
ND
ND
ND
ND





ND = Not detected


*n = 6


**standard deviation in parenthesis






Stability of omega-interferon in untreated SAIB was again tested. The results of a two week stability study (Study III) of omega-interferon in SAIB (lot #TD 2032663) are comparable to studies I and II. See Table 6, FIG. 4. The amount of oxidation was found to have increased by 5.58%, while deamidation increased by 0.39% and dimerization increased by 0.42%.


Example 4
Study IV and V: Treatment of SAIB (lot #TD2032663) with Basic Alumina with Heating or with 10% Aqueous Methionine Solution

Treatment of SAIB with Basic Alumina with Heating


SAIB was heated to 90° C. Basic alumina (15% w/w) was added to the heated SAIB. Two different grades of alumina were used—Basic Super I and Basic Standard Activity I. The resulting mixture was stirred for 40 minutes. The mixture was then centrifuged at 4000 rpm while temperature was maintained at 75° C. After centrifugation, the supernatant was collected and sampled for peroxide analysis.


Treatment of SAIB with 10% Aqueous Solution of Methionine


One part of SAIB was vigorously agitated with 4 parts of 10% aqueous solution of methionine at 80° C. for 45 minutes using a magnetic stirrer. (Evaporated water was replenished as necessary) Afterwards, the methionine solution was decanted. SAIB was then washed with 4 parts of water by agitating for 15 minutes at 70°-80° C. This washing step was carried out three times. SAIB was placed overnight in vacuum oven at 70° C. to remove residual water, and, afterwards, was sampled for peroxide analysis.


The peroxide content of SAIB treated with basic alumina or with aqueous methionine solution was determined to be 1.09.3 and 95.7 respectively (Study IV and V), indicating that these approaches were not successful in the removal of peroxides. See FIG. 7.


Example 5
Study VIa and VIb: Stability of SAIB (lot #TD2032663) Treated with 5% Aqueous Solution of Sodium Metabisulfite or Untreated for 8 Weeks

Treatment of SAIB with 5% Aqueous Solution of Sodium Metabisulfite in Presence of Hexane


SAIB was dissolved in two parts of hexane. The resulting solution was treated with a 5% aqueous solution of sodium metabisulfite by vigorous shaking. The aqueous layer was removed and the SAIB layer was washed with water. The SAIB layer was dried with MgSO4. Hexane was removed from SAIB by evaporation under vacuum at 50° C. The treated SAIB was sampled for peroxide analysis and used for preparation of suspension for stability testing.









TABLE 7







Stability of omega-interferon in untreated SAIB and treated SAIB - Study VIa and VIb


Stability of omega-IFN in Untreated SAIB (Lot: TD 2032663)














Initial (t = 0)








Protein particles
Initial (t = 0)
1 week
2 weeks
4 weeks
8 weeks



AR 48219
AR 48445
AR48441
AR 48440
AR 50132
AR 50161













Analysis by RP-HPLC (n = 3)**













Assay (%)
11.45 (0.24) 
1.00 (0.01)
1.00 (0.01)
1.00 (0.01)
0.94 (0.01)
0.94 (0.03)


% omega-IFN
88.91 (0.39) 
87.29 (0.25) 
83.10 (0.08) 
81.62
80.17
79.35


% Oxidized
1.90 (0.39)
3.38 (0.19)
7.86 (0.14)
8.54 (0.07)
8.94 (0.08)
8.86 (0.06)


% Deamidated
2.02 (0.01)
2.15 (0.03)
2.24 (0.09)
2.59 (0.15)
3.33 (0.04)
4.46 (0.07)


% Unknown
7.17 (0.44)
7.18 (0.47)
6.80 (0.02)
7.25 (0.36)
7.55 (0.05)
7.33 (0.47)









Analysis by SEC (n = 3)**













% Monomer
99.67 (0.01) 
99.57 (0.02) 
99.16 (0.01) 
98.93
99.15
97.18


% Dimer
0.25 (0.01)
0.31 (0.02)
0.72 (0.01)
1.01 (0.04)
0.47 (0.05)
2.53 (0.13)


Unknown
0.08 (0.00)
0.12 (0.01)
0.12 (0.00)
0.06 (0.00)
0.38 (0.02)
0.30 (0.05)










Note:


The omega content in the suspension was 1.00% and not 1.66% because the particles contained 11.45% omega and


the loading of particles in suspension was at 10%


Stability of omega-IFN in Treated SAIB (Lot: TD 2032663)














Initial (t = 0)








Protein particles
Initial (t = 0)
1 week
2 weeks
4 weeks
8 weeks



AR 48219
AR 48445
AR48441
AR 48440
AR 50132
AR 50161













Analysis by RP-HPLC (n = 3)**













Assay (%)
11.45 (0.24) 
1.17 (0.01)
1.15 (0.00)
1.16 (0.00)
1.15 (0.00)
1.14 (0.01)


% omega-IFN
88.91 (0.39) 
88.11 (0.35) 
86.25 (0.41) 
85.83
85.41
84.52


% Oxidized
1.90 (0.39)
2.69 (0.17)
3.26 (0.07)
3.46 (0.09)
3.56 (0.05)
4.16 (0.11)


% Deamidated
2.02 (0.01)
2.26 (0.04)
2.81 (0.01)
2.94 (0.04)
3.21 (0.06)
3.64 (0.06)


% Unknown
7.17 (0.44)
6.97 (0.39)
7.68 (0.37)
7.77 (0.38)
7.81 (0.45)
7.77 (0.55)









Analysis by SEC (n = 3)**













% Monomer
99.67 (0.01) 
99.59 (0.02) 
99.34 (0.02) 
99.41
99.42
99.00


% Dimer
0.25 (0.01)
0.35 (0.02)
0.53 (0.02)
0.54 (0.02)
0.29 (0.01)
0.94 (0.06)


Unknown
0.08 (0.00)
0.05 (0.00)
0.13 (0.01)
0.05 (0.01)
0.29 (0.01)
0.06 (0.01)










Note:


The omega content in the suspension was 1.17% and not 1.66% because the particles contained 11.45% omega and


the loading of particles in suspension was at 10%.


**standard deviation in parenthesis






The stability study (Study VIa and VIb, Table 7, FIGS. 5-7) conducted in treated (5% aqueous solution of sodium metabisulfite) and untreated SAIB shows that oxidation levels are reduced at 8 weeks, along with the reduction of peroxide levels—4.16% in treated SAIB versus 8.86% in untreated. SAIB equivalent to a change of 2.26% and 6.96%, respectively, from t=0 values of the protein particles. (For all relative changes reported herein, the changes are based on differences between the percentage values, e.g., percent oxidation, at tn and t=0 of the particles as opposed to relative percent change from value at t=0). Deamidation increased by 2.44% and 1.62% in untreated and treated SAIB, respectively. Dimerization increased by 2.28% and 0.59% in untreated and treated SAIB %, respectively. The quantities of unknown did not change significantly over time, which indicates that the extent of oxidation, deamidation and dimerization in treated SAIB (low peroxide value of 2.6 ppm) was lower than in untreated material. This treatment decreased the peroxide content substantially.









TABLE 8







Peroxide content of SAIB














Peroxide



Study
SAIB

value
AR


#
(Lot #)
Treatment
(ppm)*
numbers














I
TD1030507
Untreated
71.4
48557


IIa
TD1030507
Treated with neutral
66.3
48568




alumina by heating


IIb
TD1030507
Treated with neutral
62.9
48568




alumina using ethanol


III
TD2032663
Untreated
115.9
48581


IV
TD2032663
Treated with basic
109.3
48581




alumina by heating


V
TD2032663
Treated with 10% aqueous
95.7
48446




solution of methionine


VIa
TD2032663
Treated with hexane and
2.6
49648




sodium metabisulfite


VIb
TD2032663
Untreated
115.9**
48581





*oxidative activity equivalent to hydrogen peroxide (n = 1)


**peroxide content determined during Study III






As shown in FIG. 7, along with data provided in Table 8, treatment with an aqueous solution of sodium metabisulfite was effective in significantly reducing peroxide levels from 115.9 ppm to 2.6 ppm—almost 45 times, or 45 fold decrease. In comparison, treatment with neutral alumina, either with heat or with ethanol, resulting in only a nominal change in peroxide levels—a 7% or 12% decrease, respectively. In addition, treatment with basic alumina with heat or 10% aqueous methionine only resulted in nominal change in peroxide levels—a 6% or 18% decrease, respectively.



FIG. 8 illustrates an osmotically pump-driven implantable device for delivering an SAIB formulation acting as a drug delivery vehicle, active agent within. Depicted in FIG. 8 is an osmotically pump-driven implantable device 10 shown comprising an impermeable reservoir 12. The reservoir 12 is divided into two chambers by a piston 16. The first chamber 18 is adapted to contain an SAIB formulation 19 containing an active agent 20 and the second chamber 21 is adapted to contain a fluid-imbibing agent. A back-diffusion regulating outlet 22 is inserted into the open end of the first chamber 18 and a semipermeable membrane 24 encloses the open end of the second chamber 1. The piston 16 is driven towards the open end of the first chamber 18 by the osmotic pressure generated by the fluid-imbibing agent in the second chamber 21. The pressure created by the piston 16 can force the contents of the first chamber 18 out the opening, i.e., the SAIB formulation 19 comprising active agents 20. The release rate of the active agent can be governed by the osmotic pumping rate.


It is to be appreciated that certain features of the invention which are, for clarity, described above in the context of separate embodiments, may also be provided in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features of the invention that are, for brevity, described in the context of a single embodiment, may also be provided separately or in any subcombination. Further, reference to values stated in ranges includes each and every value within that range, unless clearly expressed otherwise.


The entire disclosure of each patent, patent application, and publication cited or described in this document is incorporated herein by reference.

Claims
  • 1. A formulation comprising: a drug;sucrose acetate isobutyrate; andperoxide,
  • 2. The formulation of claim 1, wherein the peroxide is present in the formulation at a level ranging from 5 ppm to 20 ppm.
  • 3. The formulation of claim 1, wherein the peroxide is present in the formulation at a level ranging from 10 ppm to 20 ppm.
  • 4. The formulation of claim 1, wherein the peroxide is present in the formulation at a level ranging from 2.6 ppm to 10 ppm.
  • 5. The formulation of claim 1, wherein the peroxide is present in the formulation at a level ranging from 5 ppm to 10 ppm.
  • 6. The formulation of claim 1, wherein the drug is selected from peptides, polypeptides, proteins, nucleic acids, viruses, antibodies and small molecules susceptible to oxidation.
  • 7. The formulation of claim 1, wherein the drug is selected from steroids, NSAIDs, growth factors, hormones, anti-tumor agents, antibiotics, analgesics, local anesthetics, antiviral agents, antipsychotics, anticoagulants, and oligonucleotides for gene therapy.
  • 8. The formulation of claim 1, further comprising a pharmaceutically acceptable solvent.
  • 9. The formulation of claim 1, further comprising a solvent comprising hexane, ethyl acetate, ethanol, benzyl benzoate, N-methyl pyrrolidone, or isopropyl alcohol, or a combination thereof.
  • 10. The formulation of claim 1, further comprising N-methyl pyrrolidone.
  • 11. The formulation of claim 1, wherein the drug comprises a local anesthetic and the formulation further comprises N-methyl pyrrolidone.
  • 12. The formulation of claim 1, wherein the drug comprises a local anesthetic and the formulation further comprises a pharmaceutically acceptable solvent.
  • 13. A formulation comprising: a drug;sucrose acetate isobutyrate; andperoxide,
  • 14. The formulation of claim 13, wherein the peroxide is present in the formulation at a level ranging from 5 ppm to 20 ppm.
  • 15. The formulation of claim 13, wherein the peroxide is present in the formulation at a level ranging from 2.6 ppm to 10 ppm.
  • 16. The formulation of claim 13, wherein the drug is selected from steroids, NSAIDs, growth factors, hormones, anti-tumor agents, antibiotics, analgesics, local anesthetics, antiviral agents, antipsychotics, anticoagulants, and oligonucleotides for gene therapy.
  • 17. The formulation of claim 13, further comprising a pharmaceutically acceptable solvent.
  • 18. The formulation of claim 13, further comprising N-methyl pyrrolidone.
  • 19. The formulation of claim 13, wherein the drug comprises a local anesthetic and further comprising N-methyl pyrrolidone.
  • 20. The formulation of claim 13, wherein the peroxide is present in the formulation at a level ranging from 5 ppm to 10 ppm.
  • 21. The formulation of claim 13, wherein the drug is selected from peptides, polypeptides, proteins, nucleic acids, viruses, antibodies and small molecules susceptible to oxidation.
  • 22. The formulation of claim 13, wherein the drug comprises a local anesthetic and the formulation further comprises a pharmaceutically acceptable solvent.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional application No. 60/702,546, filed Jul. 26, 2005, which is incorporated herein in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (259)
Number Name Date Kind
2931802 Toney Apr 1960 A
3215137 Laakso et al. Nov 1965 A
3346381 Grieg Oct 1967 A
3473949 Eldred et al. Oct 1969 A
3743398 Johnson et al. Jul 1973 A
3755466 Reuter et al. Aug 1973 A
3763018 Raff Oct 1973 A
3797492 Place Mar 1974 A
3853837 Fujino et al. Dec 1974 A
3962162 Sclunank Jun 1976 A
3987790 Eckenhoff et al. Oct 1976 A
3992365 Beddell et al. Nov 1976 A
4008719 Theeuwes et al. Feb 1977 A
4024248 Konig et al. May 1977 A
4069251 Mannsfield et al. Jan 1978 A
4100274 Dutta et al. Jul 1978 A
4304767 Heller et al. Dec 1981 A
4305927 Theeuwes et al. Dec 1981 A
4395405 Noda et al. Jul 1983 A
4395495 Cununings Jul 1983 A
4411890 Momany Oct 1983 A
4487603 Harris Dec 1984 A
4530840 Tice et al. Jul 1985 A
4562024 Rogerson Dec 1985 A
4622219 Haynes Nov 1986 A
4630019 Portner et al. Dec 1986 A
4692147 Duggan Sep 1987 A
4725442 Haynes Feb 1988 A
4725852 Gamblin et al. Feb 1988 A
4767628 Hutchinson Aug 1988 A
4782104 Nakanishi Nov 1988 A
4795641 Kashdan Jan 1989 A
4834984 Goldie et al. May 1989 A
4844909 Goldie et al. Jul 1989 A
4861598 Oshlack Aug 1989 A
4865845 Eckenhoff et al. Sep 1989 A
4874388 Wong et al. Oct 1989 A
4891225 Langer Jan 1990 A
4906474 Langer Mar 1990 A
4938763 Dunn et al. Jul 1990 A
4957744 Della Valle et al. Sep 1990 A
4970075 Oshlack Nov 1990 A
4990341 Goldie et al. Feb 1991 A
5034229 Magruder et al. Jul 1991 A
5057318 Magruder et al. Oct 1991 A
5059423 Magruder et al. Oct 1991 A
5110596 Magruder et al. May 1992 A
5112614 Magruder et al. May 1992 A
5137727 Eckenhoff Aug 1992 A
5149543 Cohen Sep 1992 A
5151093 Theeuwes et al. Sep 1992 A
5188837 Domb Feb 1993 A
5192743 Hsu et al. Mar 1993 A
5219572 Sivaramakishnan et al. Jun 1993 A
5234692 Magruder et al. Aug 1993 A
5234693 Magruder et al. Aug 1993 A
5266331 Oshlack et al. Nov 1993 A
5278201 Dunn et al. Jan 1994 A
5278202 Dunn et al. Jan 1994 A
5279608 Cherif Cheikh Jan 1994 A
5286496 Stapler et al. Feb 1994 A
5308348 Balaban et al. May 1994 A
5312389 Theeuwes et al. May 1994 A
5324519 Dunn et al. Jun 1994 A
5324520 Dunn et al. Jun 1994 A
5330835 Kikuchi et al. Jul 1994 A
5336057 Fukuda et al. Aug 1994 A
5340572 Patel et al. Aug 1994 A
5340849 Dunn et al. Aug 1994 A
5350741 Takada Sep 1994 A
5352662 Brooks et al. Oct 1994 A
5356635 Raman et al. Oct 1994 A
5368588 Bettinger Nov 1994 A
5370864 Peterson et al. Dec 1994 A
5382424 Stapler et al. Jan 1995 A
5391381 Wong et al. Feb 1995 A
5399353 Bartnik et al. Mar 1995 A
5399363 Liversidge et al. Mar 1995 A
5442033 Bezwada Aug 1995 A
5456679 Balaban et al. Oct 1995 A
5478577 Sacklet et al. Dec 1995 A
5487898 Lu et al. Jan 1996 A
5505922 Thut Apr 1996 A
5511355 Dingler Apr 1996 A
5540912 Roorda et al. Jul 1996 A
5545408 Trigg et al. Aug 1996 A
5549912 Oshlack et al. Aug 1996 A
5557318 Gabriel Sep 1996 A
5569450 Duan et al. Oct 1996 A
5599552 Dunn et al. Feb 1997 A
5599852 Scopelianos Feb 1997 A
5628993 Yamagata May 1997 A
5633000 Grossman et al. May 1997 A
5656295 Oshlack et al. Aug 1997 A
5672360 Sackler et al. Sep 1997 A
5702716 Dunn et al. Dec 1997 A
5713847 Howard, III et al. Feb 1998 A
5725841 Duan et al. Mar 1998 A
5728396 Peery et al. Mar 1998 A
5733950 Dunn et al. Mar 1998 A
5736152 Dunn Apr 1998 A
5739176 Dunn et al. Apr 1998 A
5747051 Granger et al. May 1998 A
5747058 Tipton et al. May 1998 A
5750100 Yamagata et al. May 1998 A
5759563 Yewey et al. Jun 1998 A
5777124 Zavareh et al. Jul 1998 A
5780044 Yewey et al. Jul 1998 A
5786484 Dyer et al. Jul 1998 A
5801012 Soff et al. Sep 1998 A
5836935 Ashton et al. Nov 1998 A
5840329 Bai Nov 1998 A
5874388 Hsu Feb 1999 A
5879705 Heafield et al. Mar 1999 A
5919473 Elkhoury Jul 1999 A
5932597 Brown Aug 1999 A
5942241 Chasin et al. Aug 1999 A
5968542 Tipton Oct 1999 A
5976109 Hemth Nov 1999 A
5985305 Peery et al. Nov 1999 A
5994548 Langston et al. Nov 1999 A
5997527 Gumucio et al. Dec 1999 A
5997902 Maruyama et al. Dec 1999 A
6008355 Huang et al. Dec 1999 A
6042811 Duan et al. Mar 2000 A
6051558 Burns et al. Apr 2000 A
6093420 Baichwal Jul 2000 A
6113938 Chen et al. Sep 2000 A
6126919 Stefely et al. Oct 2000 A
6130200 Brodbeck et al. Oct 2000 A
6132420 Dionne et al. Oct 2000 A
6143322 Sacl<ler et al. Nov 2000 A
6156331 Peery et al. Dec 2000 A
6203813 Gooberrnan Mar 2001 B1
6217906 Gumucio et al. Apr 2001 B1
6245351 Nara et al. Jun 2001 B1
6248112 Gambale et al. Jun 2001 B1
6261584 Peery et al. Jul 2001 B1
6270787 Ayer Aug 2001 B1
6283948 Roorda Sep 2001 B1
6291013 Gibson et al. Sep 2001 B1
6312717 Molinoff et al. Nov 2001 B1
6375978 Kleiner et al. Apr 2002 B1
6384227 Dyer et al. May 2002 B2
6395292 Peery et al. May 2002 B2
6403609 Asgherian Jun 2002 B1
6413536 Gibson et al. Jul 2002 B1
6420454 Wenz et al. Jul 2002 B1
6426339 Berde et al. Jul 2002 B1
6436091 Harper et al. Aug 2002 B1
6440493 Gibson et al. Aug 2002 B1
6447522 Gambale et al. Sep 2002 B2
6468961 Brodbeck et al. Oct 2002 B1
6479074 Murdock et al. Nov 2002 B2
6486138 Asgherian et al. Nov 2002 B1
6498153 Cady et al. Dec 2002 B1
6508808 Carr et al. Jan 2003 B1
6514516 Chasin et al. Feb 2003 B1
6521259 Chasin et al. Feb 2003 B1
6524607 Goldenheim et al. Feb 2003 B1
6525102 Chen et al. Feb 2003 B1
6699908 Sackler Mar 2004 B2
6733783 Oshlack May 2004 B2
6840931 Peterson et al. Jan 2005 B2
6921541 Chasin et al. Jul 2005 B2
6992065 Okumu Jan 2006 B2
7053209 Gibson et al. May 2006 B1
7833543 Gibson et al. Nov 2010 B2
8133507 Yum et al. Mar 2012 B2
8147870 Yum et al. Apr 2012 B2
8153149 Verity Apr 2012 B2
8153152 Yum et al. Apr 2012 B2
8153661 Verity Apr 2012 B2
8168217 Yum et al. May 2012 B2
8231903 Fraatz et al. Jul 2012 B2
8337883 Yum et al. Dec 2012 B2
8354124 Yum et al. Jan 2013 B2
8415401 Yum et al. Apr 2013 B2
8420120 Yum et al. Apr 2013 B2
8496943 Fereira et al. Jul 2013 B2
8753665 Verity Jun 2014 B2
8846072 Verity Sep 2014 B2
8945614 Yum et al. Feb 2015 B2
8951556 Yum et al. Feb 2015 B2
20010000522 Dyer et al. Apr 2001 A1
20010029257 Murdock et al. Oct 2001 A1
20020001631 Okumu Jan 2002 A1
20020064536 Hunt May 2002 A1
20020114835 Sackler et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020173552 Cleland et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030044467 Brodbeck et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030045454 Okumu et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030059376 Libbey et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030108609 Berry et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030114430 MacLeod et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030152637 Chasin et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030170289 Chen et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030180364 Chen et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030185873 Chasin et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030215515 Truong-le et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040001889 Chen et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040024021 Sudo et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040024069 Chen et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040042194 Hsieh Mar 2004 A1
20040052336 Langlet et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040101557 Gibson et al. May 2004 A1
20040109893 Chen et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040138237 Shah Jul 2004 A1
20040142902 Struijker- Boudier Jul 2004 A1
20040146562 Shah Jul 2004 A1
20040151753 Chen et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040161382 Yum et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040208845 Michal et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040224019 Zale et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040224903 Berry et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050008661 Fereira et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050042194 Ng et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050095284 Trautman May 2005 A1
20050106214 Chen May 2005 A1
20050106304 Cook et al. May 2005 A1
20050171052 Cook et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050232876 Minga et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050244489 Paris Nov 2005 A1
20050266087 Junnarkar et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050276856 Fereira et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050281879 Chen et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060034926 Fraatz et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060058401 Ishikawa et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060165800 Chen et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060210599 Gibson et al. Sep 2006 A1
20080023261 Kaneko et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080145419 Gibson et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080152708 Gibson et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080167630 Verity Jul 2008 A1
20080206321 Yum et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080287464 Wright et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090023689 Yum et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090023690 Yum et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090036490 Verity Feb 2009 A1
20090037490 Ohira Feb 2009 A1
20090215808 Yum et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090298862 Yum et al. Dec 2009 A1
20110009451 Verity Jan 2011 A1
20120135072 Yum et al. May 2012 A1
20120135073 Yum et al. May 2012 A1
20120177697 Chen Jul 2012 A1
20130251674 Fereira et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130281480 Yum et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130287845 Yum et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130289053 Wright et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130289069 Verity Oct 2013 A1
20130295168 Yum et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130317049 Yum et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130337059 Yum et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130337060 Yum et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130345260 Gibson et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140275147 Yum et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140308352 Wright et al. Oct 2014 A1
20150196644 Yum et al. Jul 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (138)
Number Date Country
8374575 Aug 1975 AU
2222567 Dec 1996 CA
2283517 Apr 1998 CA
2291087 Dec 1998 CA
2303442 Mar 1999 CA
1569231 Aug 1969 DE
2213717 Nov 1972 DE
2321174 Nov 1973 DE
2438352 Feb 1976 DE
2720245 Nov 1977 DE
19520237 Dec 1996 DE
19714765 Oct 1998 DE
0244118 Nov 1987 EP
0290983 Nov 1988 EP
0413528 Feb 1991 EP
0539751 Oct 1991 EP
0535899 Apr 1993 EP
0537559 Apr 1993 EP
0539559 May 1993 EP
0621042 Oct 1994 EP
0635531 Jan 1995 EP
0640336 Mar 1995 EP
0671162 Sep 1995 EP
0711548 May 1996 EP
0773034 May 1997 EP
0999825 May 2000 EP
1010436 Jun 2000 EP
0782569 Mar 2002 EP
0804417 Jun 2003 EP
0788480 Jul 2003 EP
0788481 Aug 2003 EP
1348427 Oct 2003 EP
1032390 Nov 2003 EP
0778768 May 2004 EP
15480093 Jun 2005 EP
1212092 Oct 2005 EP
2238478 Oct 2010 EP
1088992 Oct 1967 GB
2238478 Jun 1991 GB
S59210024 Nov 1984 JP
S62000419 Jan 1987 JP
63302858 Dec 1988 JP
2096516 Apr 1990 JP
H05194273 Aug 1993 JP
H0753356 Feb 1995 JP
07070297 Mar 1995 JP
H07112940 May 1995 JP
H07115901 May 1995 JP
H07124196 May 1995 JP
8505395 Jun 1996 JP
08206191 Aug 1996 JP
8512303 Dec 1996 JP
H09502181 Mar 1997 JP
2000185091 Jul 2000 JP
4330175 Jun 2009 JP
4501076 Jul 2010 JP
WO1990003768 Apr 1990 WO
WO1990003809 Apr 1990 WO
WO1991016929 Nov 1991 WO
WO1991017900 Nov 1991 WO
WO1991018016 Nov 1991 WO
WO1992017900 Oct 1992 WO
WO1993000006 Jan 1993 WO
WO1993003751 Mar 1993 WO
WO1993007833 Apr 1993 WO
WO1994005265 Mar 1994 WO
WO1994015587 Jul 1994 WO
WO1995001786 Jan 1995 WO
WO1995006693 Mar 1995 WO
WO1995009613 Apr 1995 WO
WO1995017901 Jul 1995 WO
WO1996009290 Mar 1996 WO
WO1996012699 May 1996 WO
WO1996012700 May 1996 WO
WO1996022281 Jul 1996 WO
WO1996039995 Dec 1996 WO
WO1996041616 Dec 1996 WO
WO1997015285 May 1997 WO
WO1997027840 Aug 1997 WO
WO1997049391 Dec 1997 WO
WO1998027962 Jul 1998 WO
WO1998027963 Jul 1998 WO
WO1998034596 Aug 1998 WO
WO1998044903 Oct 1998 WO
WO1998051246 Nov 1998 WO
WO1998053837 Dec 1998 WO
WO1999006023 Feb 1999 WO
WO1999013913 Mar 1999 WO
WO1999025349 May 1999 WO
WO1999033446 Jul 1999 WO
WO2000000120 Jan 2000 WO
WO2000000181 Jan 2000 WO
WO2000033866 Jun 2000 WO
WO2000045790 Aug 2000 WO
WO2000054745 Sep 2000 WO
WO2001 043528 Dec 2000 WO
WO2000078335 Dec 2000 WO
WO2001042518 Dec 2000 WO
WO2001015734 Mar 2001 WO
WO2001051024 Jul 2001 WO
WO2001051041 Jul 2001 WO
WO2001 076599 Oct 2001 WO
WO2001 078983 Oct 2001 WO
WO2001 049336 Dec 2001 WO
WO200201 0436 Feb 2002 WO
WO2002028366 Apr 2002 WO
WO2002043800 Jun 2002 WO
WO2002053187 Jul 2002 WO
WO2002067895 Sep 2002 WO
WO2003000282 Jan 2003 WO
WO2003041684 May 2003 WO
WO2003041757 May 2003 WO
WO2003072113 Sep 2003 WO
WO2003086368 Oct 2003 WO
WO2003101358 Dec 2003 WO
WO2003101961 Dec 2003 WO
WO2004007451 Jan 2004 WO
WO2004011032 Feb 2004 WO
WO2004037224 May 2004 WO
WO2004037289 May 2004 WO
WO2004052336 Jun 2004 WO
WO2004056338 Jul 2004 WO
WO2004082658 Sep 2004 WO
WO2004089335 Oct 2004 WO
WO2004101557 Nov 2004 WO
WO2005009408 Feb 2005 WO
WO20050487 44 Jun 2005 WO
WO2005048930 Jun 2005 WO
WO2005049069 Jun 2005 WO
WO2005105031 Nov 2005 WO
WO2005115333 Dec 2005 WO
WO2006033948 Mar 2006 WO
WO2006083950 Aug 2006 WO
WO2006084139 Aug 2006 WO
WO2006084140 Aug 2006 WO
WO2006084141 Aug 2006 WO
WO2008023261 Feb 2008 WO
WO2014144984 Sep 2014 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (113)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 14/464,624, filed Aug. 20, 2014, Verity.
“3M DDS Announces Development of New HFA-Compatible Excipients: Novel Oligomeric Acids as MDI Suspension Aids and Solubilizers,” (2000) 3M Delivery.
Adams EG, et al. “A comparison of the abuse liability oftramadol, NSAIDS, and hydrocodone in patients with chronic pain.” Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 31(5), 465-4 76 2006.
Ahuja et al. (1995) “Intra-Articular Morphine Versus Bupivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia Following Knee Arthroscopy” The Knee 2(4):227-231.
Ajayaghosh, A., et al., “Solid-Phase Synthesis of N-Methyl and N-Ethylamides of Peptides Using Photolytically Detachable ((3-Nitro-4-((alkylamino)methyl)benzamido)methyl)polystrene Resin,” J. Org. Chem., 55:2826 (1990).
Allahham A, et al. “Flow and injection characteristics of pharmaceutical parenteral formulations using a micro-capillary rheometer”. Int J Pharm. 2004;270(1-2): 139-48.
Ansel, H.C. et al., Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Drug Delivery System, sixth ed., (1995).
Barb, R. et al., “Evaluation of the Saber Delivery System for the Controlled Release of Deslorelin: Effect of Dose in Estrogen Primed Ovarectomized Gilts,” Proceed. lnt'I Symp. Control. Rel. Bioact. Mater. 26 (1999).
Bartfield et al. (1998) “Randomized Trial of Diphenhydramine Versus Benzyl Alcohol with Epinephrine as an Alternative to Lidocaine Local Anesthesia” Ann Emerg Med 32(6):650-654.
Bartfield et al. (2001) “Benzyl Alcohol with Epinephrine as an Alternative to Lidocaine With Epinephrine” J Emerg Med 21(4):375-379.
Bartosz, et al., (1997) “Antioxidant and Prooxidant Properties of Captopril and Enalapril”,Free Radical Biology & Medicine, 23(5):729-735.
Becker, S.E., et al. “Effects of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Infused in a Pulsatile or Continuous Fashion on Serum Gonadotropin Concentrations and Ovulation in the Mare,” J. Anim. Sci. (1992) 70:1208-1215.
Bekersky I, et al. “Effect oflow- and high-fat meals on tacrolimus absorption following 5 mg single oral doses to healthy human subjects.” J Clin Pharmacol 2001; 41(2): 176-82.
Betschart, R., et al., “Evaluation of the Saber.TM. Delivery System for the Controlled Release of the GnRH Analogue Deslorelin for Advancing Ovulation in Mares: Effect of Gamma Radiation”; Proceed. lnt'I Symp. Control. Rel. Bioact. Mater. 25 (1998) Controlled Release Society, Inc. pp. 655-656.
Bhatia & Singh “Percutaneous Absorption of LHRH Through Porcine Skin: Effect of N-Methyl 2-Pyrrolidone and Isopropyl Myristate”; Drug Development & Industrial Pharmacy 23(11):1113-1114 (1997).
Brevard J, et al. “Pain and opioid abuse in a population of substance abuse patients: data from the NA VIPPRO system”; Conference paper presented at the 42nd American Pain Society (APS) Annual Scientific Meeting, Washington, D.C. 2007.
Buhler, K., GnRH Agonists and Safety, in GnRH Analagoues the State of the Art 1993, a Summary of the 3rd International Symposium on GnRH Analogues in Cancer and Human Reproduction, Geneva, Feb. 1993.
Burns, P. et al., “Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of the Saber.TM. Delivery System for the Controlled Release of the GnRH Analogue Deslorelin Acetate for Advancing-Ovulation in Cyclic Mares,” Proceed. lnt'I. Symp. Control. Rel. Bioact. Mater., 24 (1997), Controlled Release Society, Inc.
Cellulose Acetate Butyrate. In: European pharmacopoeia. 4 edn. Strasbourg Cedex, France: Council of Europe; 2001; p. 853-4.
Coy, et al., “Solid Phase Synthesis of Lutcinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone and Its Analogs,” Methods Enzymol. 37, 416 (1975).
D 2857-95 (2001) “Standard Practice for Dilute Solution Viscosity of Polymers” Copyright by ASTM lnt'l.
DE, Asim K. and DE, Avik, (2014), “Reaction Rate Constants for Hydrogen Peroxide Oxidation of Phenol and Chlorinated Phenols in a Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor”, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), 3(6):222-226.
Desai et al., “Surface Modification of Polymeric Biomaterials for Reduced Thrombogenicity,” Polym. Mater. Sci. Eng., 62:731-735 (1990).
Dodson, K.M., et al. “Oral Controlled Release of Antiretrovirals Using the SABER Delivery System Incorporated into Soft Gelatin Capsules”, AAPS Meeting, 1999, New Orleans, LA.
Duan, D. et al., “Novel Dispersing Aids for Hydrofluoroalkane-Based Metered Dose Inhalers,” 1998 Conference of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists, San Francisco, California, Nov. 1998.
Duan, D. et al., “Oligomeric Lactic Acids as Solubilizing Aids for HFA-Based Metered Dose Inhalers,” 1998 Conference of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists, San Francisco, California, Nov. 1998.
Dunbar SA, Katz NP “Chronic opioid therapy for nonmalignant pain in patients with a history of substance abuse: report of20 cases.” Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 11 (3), 163-1 7 1. 1996.
English Translation of Japanese Office Action dated Mar. 6, 2012 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2009-108881.
English Translation of Japanese Office Action dated Mar. 6, 2012 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2009-2735.
Fitzgerald, B.P, et al., “Effect of Constant Administration of a Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist on Reproductive Activity in Mares: Preliminary Evidence on Suppression of Ovulation During the Breeding Season,” Am. J. Vet. Res., 1993, 54(10):1746-1751.
Fleury, J., et al., “Evaluation of the Saber.TM. Delivery System for the Controlled Release of the Deslorelin for Advancing Ovulation in the Mare: Effects of Formulation & Dose,” Proceed. lnt'I. Symp. Control. Rel. Bioact. Mater. 25 (1998) Controlled Release Society, Inc. pp. 657-658.
Gilderman L., et al. “RemoxyJM: a New Opioid Drug with Effective Analgesia and Abuse-Resistance.” American Pain Society Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, May 2006.
Ginther, O.J., Reproductive Biology of the Mare: Basic and Applied Aspects, EquiServices, Chapter 12, 499-508 Cross Plains, Wisconsin (1970).
Ginther, O.J. et al. “Effect of a Synthetic Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone on Plasma Concentrations of Luteinizing Hormone in Ponies,” Am. J. Vet. Res., 35: 79-81 (1974).
Ginther, O.J., “Ultrasonic Imaging and Reproductive Events in the Mare,” Equiservices, Cross Plains, WI Chapter 4:43-72 (1986).
Glajchen, M. “Chronic Pain: Treatment Barriers and Strategies for Clinical Practice.” JAM Board Fam Pract. 2001, 14(3): 178-183.
Harrison, L., et al. “Comparison of HCG, Buserelin and Luprostiol for Induction of Ovulation in Cycling Mares,” J. Eq. Vet. Sci., 11:163-166 (1991).
Hatakeyama et al., “Synthesis and physical properties of polyurethanes from saccharide-based polycaprolactones.” Macromolecular Symposia, vol. 130, pp. 127-138, 1998.
Hays LR. “A profile of OxyContin addiction”; Journal of Addictive Diseases 23(4), 1-9. 2004.
Henry (1995) “Sucrose Acetate Isobutyrate Special Grade for Beverage Applications” International Food Ingredients No. 1 p. 47.
Hoskin PJ, et al. “The bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of morphine after intravenous, oral and buccal administration in healthy volunteers.” Br J Clin Pharmacol 1989; 27 (4):499-505.
Hoffmann, M.R. and Edwards, J.O., (1975) “Kinetics of the Oxidation of Sulfite by Hydrogen Peroxide in Acidic Solution”, The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 79(20):2096-2098.
Hyland, J.H., et al. “Infusion of Gonadotrophin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Induces of Ovulation and Fertile Oestrus in Mares During Seasonal Anoestrus,” J. Reprod. Fert., Suppl. 35 (1987):211-220.
Inciardi et al. (2007) “Mechanisms of prescription drug diversion among drug-involved club and street-based populations” Pain Medicine. 8(2), 17 1-183.
Irvine, C.H.G., “GnRH Clinical Application,”; In Equine Reproduction, (eds) McKinon, A.O. and Voss, J.L., Chapter 36, pp. 41-45, Lea & Febiger (1993).
Irvine, D.S., “Duration of Oestrus and Time of Ovulation in Mares Treated with Synthetic GnRH (Ay24,031),” J. Reprod. Fert. Supp. 23:279-283 (1975).
Ishida T, Oguri K, et al. “Isolation and identitication of urinary metabolites of oxycodone in rabbits.” Drug Metab Dispos 1979; 7 (3): 162-5.
Ishida T, Oguri K, Yoshimura H. “Determination of oxycodone metabolites in urines and feces of several mammalian species.” J Pharmacobiodyn 1982; 5 (7):52 1-5.
Iyakuhin (1974) “Jitsuyo lyakuhin Tenkabutsu (Practical Medical Additives)” Kagaku Kogyo-sha, Tokyo.
Japanese Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2007-532447 dated Nov. 15, 2011.
Jochle, W., et al., Control of Ovulation in the Mare with Ovuplant.TM., a Short-Term Release Implant (STI) Containing the GNRH Analogue Deslorelin Acetate: J. Eq. Vet. Sci., 44:632 (1994).
Johnson & Verity (2002) “Applications of Continuous Site-Directed Drug Delivery” Proc West Pharmacal Soc 45:219-222.
Johnston LO, O'Malley PM, Bachman JG, Schulenberg, JE. “Monitoring the future. National results on adolescent drug use: overview of key findings” (NIH Publication No. 05-5726). Bethesda MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse 2004.
Kasraian et al. (1999) “Developing an Injectable Formula Containing an Oxygen-Sensitive. Drug: a Case Study of Danofloxacin Injectable” Pharm Dev Technol 4(4):475-480.
Katz NP, et al. “Behavioral monitoring and urine toxicology testing in patients receiving longterm opioid therapy.” Anesth Analg. 97(4), 1097-1102, (2003).
Katz NP, et al. “Challenges in the development of prescription opioid abuse-deterrent formulations.” Clin J Pain. 2007;23(8):648-60.
Katz NP, et al. “Development and preliminary experience with an ease of extractability rating system for prescription opioids.” Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy. 32(6) 727-746(20). 2006.
Katz NP, et al. “Prescription monitoring of medical and non-medical Schedule u opioid abuse in Massachusetts: 1996-2005.” Conference paper presented at the 69th College on Problems of Drug Dependence (CPDD). Quebec Canada 2007.
Kim et al. (2001) “Comparing the Effect on Protein Stability of Methionine Oxidation Versus Mutagenesis: Steps Toward Engineering Oxidative Resistance in Proteins” Protein Engineerinq 14(5):343-347.
Kulkarni et al., “Polyactic Acid for Surgical Implants,”; Arch. Surg., 93:389 (1966).
Lacoste, D., et al., “Reversible inhibition of testicular androgen secretion by 3-, 5- and 6-month controlled-release microsphere formulations of the LH-RH agonist [d-Trp6, des-Gly-NH210] LH-RH ethylamide in the dog”; J. Steroid Biochem. 33:5, 1007-1011 (1989).
Lalovic B, et al. “Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral oxycodone in healthy human subjects: role of circulating active metabolites” Clin Pharmacol Ther 2006; 79(5):461-79.
Lapenna, Domenico, et al., (1995) “The Prooxidant Properties of Captopril”, Biochemical Pharmacology, 50(1):27-32.
Li, Shihong, et al., (1993) “Chemical Pathways of Peptide Degradation. V. Ascorbic Acid Promotes Rather than Inhibits the Oxidation of Methionine to Methionine Sulf oxide in Small Model Peptides”, Pharmaceutical Research, 10(11):1572-1579.
Loy, R.G. et al. “The Effects of Human Chorionic Gonadotrophin on Ovulation, Length of Estrus, and Fertility in the Mare,” Cornell Vet. 56:41-50 (1966).
Lu, Jian-Ming, et al., (2010) “Chemical and molecular mechanisms of antioxidants: experimental approaches and model systems”, J. Cell. Mol. Med., 14(4):840-860.
Material Safety Data Sheet of Eastman Chemical Products, “SAIB” Sucrose Acetate lsobutyrate, pp. 2-18.
Material Safety Data Sheet of Eastman Chemical Products, “SAIB” Sucrose Acetate lsobutyrate, Publication GN-311 F (Jun. 2004).
Material Safety Data Sheet of Eastman Fine Chemicals, “Sucrose Acetate lsobutyrate, Special Grade (SAIB-SG),” Publication No. EFC-211, May 1991.
Material Safety Data Sheet of Eastman Products for the Food Industry, “Sucrose Acetate lsbutyrate (SAIB-SB) for Use in Fruit-Flavored Beverages,” Publication No. ZM-90, pp. 2-7 (Sep. 1989).
McCabe et al. “Motives, diversion and routes of administration associated with nonmedical use of prescription opioids.” Addictive Behaviors. 32, 562-575. 2007.
McLellan AT, Luborsky L, Woody GE, O'Brien CP. “An improved diagnostic instrument for substance abuse patients.” The Addiction Severity Index. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1980; 168:26-33.
Mearns, “Changing Seasons,” The Blood-Horse, Sep. 28, 1996, 4794-4795.
McCarthy, P. et al., “Management of Stallions on Large Breeding Farms,” Stallion Management, vol. 8, No. 1, Apr. 1992, pp. 219-235.
McKinnon, A.O., et al. “Effect of a GnRH Analogue (Ovuplant), hCG and Dexamethasone on Time to Ovulation in Cycling Mares.” World Equine Veterinary Review, (1997) 2:3 16-18.
McKinnon, A.O., et al. “Repeated Use of a GnRH Analogue Deslorelin (Ovuplant) for Hastening Ovulation in the Transitional Mare,” Equine Vet. J., (1996) 29:2 153-155.
Merrifield, B., “Solid phase synthesis”; Science 232:342 (1986).
Meyer RJ, et al. Awareness topic: mitigating the risk of ethanol induced dose dumping from oral sustained controlled release dosage forms. In: FDA's Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science Meeting, Oct. 2005.
Montovan, S.M., et al., “The Effect of a Potent GnRH Agonist on Gonadal and Sexual Activity in the Horse,” Theriogenology, 33:6, 1305-1321 (1990).
Mumford, E.L. et al., “Use of Deslorelin Short-Term Implants to Induce Ovulation in Cycling Mares During Three Consecutive Estrov Cycles,” Animal Reproduction Science, 139 (1995) 129-140.
Murray S, et al. “Alcohol-associated rapid release of a long-acting opioid” CMAJ 2005; 173(7):756.
Nakagaki (1968) “Seizai Butsuri Kagaku (Physical Chemistry of Medical Preparations),” Asakura Shoten, Tokyo.
Nally, J., et al., “Induction of Mucosal lgA Specific for SeMF3 for Streptococcus equi with Intranasal Vaccination Using a Sucrose Acetate lsobutyrate Based Delivery System”, Proceed. lnt'I. Symp. Control. Rel. Bioact. Mater. 26 (1999) Controlled Release Society, Inc.
Nett et al., “Further Studies on the Radioimmunoassay of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone: Effect of Radioiodination, Antiserum and Unextracted Serum on Levels of lmmunoreactivity in Serum,” Endocrinology 101:1135 (1977).
“New Drugs/Programs”, Current Drug Discovery, Nov. 2004 pp. 7-10.
“Polycaprolactone” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polycaprolactone 1 page, Jun. 16, 2008.
“Polyglycolide” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyglycolide 3 pages, printed Jun. 16, 2008.
“Polylactic Acid”; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polylactic_acid, 1 page, printed Jun. 16, 2008.
Pulido et al., “Enzymatic Regioselective Acylation of Hexoses and Pentoses Using Oxime Esters.”, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1, (21), 2891-2898, 1992.
Rabb et al., “Effects of Active lmmunication Against GnRH on LH, FSH and Prolactin Storage, Sectretion and Response to Their Secretagogues in Pony Geldings,” J. Anim. Sci., 68:3322-3329 (1990).
Reynolds, R.C. et al., “Sucrose acetate isobutyrate (SAIB): historical aspects of its use in beverages and a review of toxicity studies prior to 1988,” Food Chem. Toxicol., 1998,36 (2), pp. 81-93.
Reynolds, R.C., “Metabolism and pharmacokinetics of sucrose acetate isobutyrate (SAIB) and sucrose octaisobutyrate (SOIB) in rats, dogs, monkeys or humans. a review,” Food Chern. Toxicol. 1998 36 (2). 95-99.
Roser, J.J., et al., “The Development of Antibodies to Human Chorionic Gonadotrpins Following its Repeated Injection in the Cyclic Mare,” J. Reprod. Fert. Suppl., 173-179 (1979).
Sullivan, J., “Duration of Estrus and Ovulation Time in Nonlactating Mares Given Human Chorionic Gonadotropin During Three Successive Estrous Periods,” J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc., 63:895 (1973).
Sullivan, S. A., 1998, “Sustained Release of Orally Administered Active Using SABER™ Delivery System Incorporated into Soft Gelatin Capsules” Proceed. lnt'I Symp. Control. Rel. Bioact. Mater., 25:918-919.
Swiderski et al., “Application of 14C Isotope in Studies of Liability of Sugar Substitutents”, Nukleonike, Supl., (1996), 10, 347-52.
Thompson, Jr., D.L., et al., “Effects of Melatonin and Thyrotropin Releasing Hormone of Mares Durign the Nonbreeding Season,” J. Anim Sci., 58:3, 668-677(1983).
Thompson, Jr., D.L., et al., “Testosterone Effects on Mares During Synchoronization with Altrenogest: FSH, LH, Estrous, Duration and Pregnancy Rate,” J. Anim Sci., 56:3, 678-686 (1983).
Trescot AM, et al. “Opioid Guidelines in the Management of Chronic Non-Cancer Pain.” Pain Physician. 2006;9: 1-40.
Troen et al. (2003) “The Atherogenic Effect of Excess Methionine Intake” PNAS 100(5):15089-15094.
University of Utah, Department of Chemical Engineering (2006) “A Viscosity: Viscosity Definitions” http://www.che.utah.edu/department_equipment/Projects_lab/A_Viscometers/ViscosityD efinitions.pdf.
Vega-Rios A, Villalobos H, Mata-Segreda JF. “Acid-catalyzed hydrolysis oftriacylglycerols obeys monoexponential kinetics.” Int J Chern Kinet. 1992; 24:887-94.
Voss, J.L. et al. “The Effect of HCG on Duration of Oestrus, Ovulation Time and Fertility in Mares,” J. Reprod. Fert., Suppl. 23 (1975) 297-301.
Wilson et al. (1999) “Benzyl Alcohol as an Alternative Local Anesthetic” Ann Emerg Med 33(5):495-499.
Lapenna et al., (1995) “The Prooxidant Properties of Captopril,” Biochemical Pharmacology, 50(1):27-32.
Li et al., (1993) “Chemical Pathways of Peptide Degradation. V. Ascorbic Acid Promotes Rather than Inhibits the Oxidation of Methionine to Methionine Sulfoxide in Small Model Peptides,” Pharmaceutical Research, 10(11)1572-1579.
Sakagami and Satoh, (1997) “Prooxidant action of two antioxidants: ascorbic acid and gallic acid”, Anticancer Res., 17:221-224.
Tafazoli et al., (2005) “Prooxidant and Antioxidant Activity of Vitamin E Analogues and Troglitazone,” Chem. Res. Toxicol., 18:1567-1574.
Baker, M., et al., “Sulfite supported lipid peroxidation in propofol emulsions,” Anesthesiology 2002; 97: 1162-7.
Brannan, Robert G., “Reactive sulfur species act as prooxidants in liposomal and skeletal muscle model systems,” J. Agric. Food Chem., 2010, 58, 3767-3771.
Cornelli, U., et al., “Bioavailability and antioxidant activity of some food supplements in men and women using the D-Roms test as a marker of oxidative stress,” J. Nutr., 131, 3208-3211, 2011.
Elmas, O., et al., “The prooxidant effect of sodium metabisulfite in rat liver and kidney,” Reg. Tox. Pharm., 42: 77-82, 2005.
Laggner, H., et al., “Sulfite facilitates LDL lipid oxidation by transition metal ions: a pro-oxidant in wine?” FEBS Letters, 579 (2005) 6486-6492.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190365900 A1 Dec 2019 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60702546 Jul 2005 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 15250822 Aug 2016 US
Child 16542230 US
Parent 13301727 Nov 2011 US
Child 15250822 US
Parent 11492153 Jul 2006 US
Child 13301727 US