An enterprise graph query identifies an actor object set comprising one or more actor objects in a store of computer-readable enterprise objects, a target object set comprising one or more target objects in the store of computer-readable enterprise objects, and a relationship between the actor object set and the target object set. Enterprise objects are computer-readable objects in a store that relate to one or more entities, such as one or more user profiles or groups of user profiles (e.g., for a company or other organization). For example, enterprise objects may include user profiles, emails, word processing documents, slide presentations, digital photographs, digital videos, spreadsheets, databases, database tables, database rows or columns, database records, storage folders, Web pages, saved chat sessions, etc. For example, a simple enterprise graph query may request objects (the target objects) viewed by a particular user profile (the actor object) in the last fifteen days. Actor objects may be other types of objects, such as documents, etc. For example, an enterprise graph query may ask for all documents that have been viewed by user profiles who also viewed a specified document. In that case the specified document is the actor object (with an inferred action), and the other viewed documents are the target objects. Such enterprise graph queries may be very long and difficult for a user to enter, especially if the graph queries include combinations of multiple relationships between actor object set(s) and target object set(s).
It can be useful to repeat enterprise graph queries to access previously-retrieved results and/or to access updates to the results. The discussion below relates to persisting enterprise graph queries in association with an entity so that such an entity can be provided with access to updated results to the query. This can be done by accessing the persisted query, without needing user input to re-enter the original query. Entities discussed herein are computer-readable data entities stored in computer hardware, and/or the computer hardware itself. For example, an entity may be a computer-readable user profile, a group of such user profiles, a computer-readable portal site or page (e.g., a portal Web page that can be viewed by a group of logged-in user profiles, or a portal page that can be provided to mobile applications to which specified user profiles are logged in), and/or data representing a specified geographical location (e.g., global positioning coordinates within a specified range, or other positioning indicators that indicate such a specified geographical location).
In one embodiment, the tools and techniques can include a computer search service receiving an enterprise graph query from a client computing device that is remote from the computer search service, with the enterprise graph query identifying an actor object set comprising one or more actor objects in a store of computer-readable enterprise objects, a target object set comprising one or more target objects in the store of computer-readable enterprise objects, and a relationship between the actor object set and the target object set. The search service can return results of the enterprise graph query to the client device. The search service can receive from the client device an indication of user input instructing the search service to persist the enterprise graph query, with the indication of user input also instructing the search service to associate the persisted enterprise graph query with an entity. Moreover, in response to receiving the indication of user input, the search service can persist the enterprise graph query and associate the persisted enterprise graph query with the entity.
In another embodiment of the tools and techniques, a first search client computer application of a first type can receive user input requesting that an enterprise graph query be persisted in association with an entity, with the enterprise graph query identifying an actor object set comprising one or more actor objects in a store of computer-readable enterprise objects, a target object set comprising one or more target objects in the store of computer-readable enterprise objects, and a relationship between the actor object set and the target object set. The first search client computer application can request that the enterprise graph query be persisted in association with the entity in response to receiving the user input requesting that the enterprise graph query be persisted. The first search client computer application can display a first user interface item representing the persisted enterprise graph query, with the first user interface item being displayed in a first format. The first search client computer application can receive user input associated with the entity, with the user input received by the first search client computer application being directed at and selecting the first user interface item. In response to receiving the user input directed at and selecting the first user interface item, the first client computer application can request a search service to perform a first instance of the enterprise graph query. The first search client computer application can receive from the search service results of the first instance of the enterprise graph query. The first search client computer application can display at least a portion of the results of the first instance of the enterprise graph query in response to receiving the user input directed at and selecting the first user interface item.
Also, a second search client computer application of a second type that is different from the first type can display a second user interface item representing the persisted enterprise graph query. As an example, the user interface item may be surfaced in a display region for persisted query representations when a particular user interface page is displayed. As another example, the user interface item may be surfaced as a suggestion when user input is provided in a search box (e.g., if a user starts typing “Documents modified”, the system may suggest a corresponding persisted query, such as “Documents modified by Joe Johnson” using existing query suggestion techniques). The second search client computer application of the second type can receive user input associated with the entity, with the user input directed at and selecting the second user interface item. In response to receiving the user input directed at and selecting the second user interface item, the second client computer application can request the search service to perform a second instance of the enterprise graph query. The second search client computer application can receive from the search service results of the second instance of the enterprise graph query. The results of the second instance of the enterprise graph query may be the same as, entirely different from, or overlapping with the results of the first instance of the enterprise graph query, depending on the extent to which enterprise objects matching the query have or have not changed between the running of the first and second instances of the enterprise graph query. Moreover, the second search client computer application can display at least a portion of the results of the second instance of the enterprise graph query in response to receiving the user input directed at and selecting the second user interface item.
This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form. The concepts are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter. Similarly, the invention is not limited to implementations that address the particular techniques, tools, environments, disadvantages, or advantages discussed in the Background, the Detailed Description, or the attached drawings.
Embodiments described herein are directed to techniques and tools for persistence of enterprise graph queries. Such improvements may result from the use of various techniques and tools separately or in combination.
Such techniques and tools may include persisting an enterprise graph query for a user in a way that is available across devices, and/or being able to subscribe to the results returned by a persisted enterprise graph query across devices. For example, when a user has entered in a search box an enterprise graph query (e.g., a query that reads “Presented to My colleagues about Contoso”) the user may be enabled to provide user input to instruct a search service to save the enterprise graph query to easily check if any new items match the query and/or to access existing items that match the query. The persisted query may then be accessed and run from a broad set of experiences, for example, but not limited to, Web experiences (such as using a general Web browser client application), mobile app experiences (such as using a specific mobile application directed to use on a smartphone), tablet app experiences (such as using a specific mobile application directed to use on a tablet computer), client application (such as using a specific desktop client application that is configured to run on a personal computing device such as a laptop, desktop, a tablet running personal computing device software, etc.), LOB (line of business) application systems, etc.
When a user provides user input requesting that an enterprise graph query be persisted, the query (i.e., a computer-readable definition of the query) can be persisted in the enterprise graph service, or search service. A wide variety of devices and experiences that are authenticated to the search service can have access to the persisted query and may execute the query as a result of a user action or based on other criteria, such as timer jobs.
When an enterprise graph query has been persisted in response to user input, the results returned from the enterprise graph query can be available to devices and experiences as a stream of item notifications (which may include the updated items), making it possible to keep updated for any changes to the related graph index actor objects, relationships, or target objects.
Accordingly, one or more substantial technical benefits can be realized from the tools and techniques described herein. For example, enterprise graph queries can be run and/or re-run more with less effort on the part of a user, and possibly with fewer computing resources being involved. For example, re-running a query may involve a user simply providing a single user input action that selects a visual representation of the persisted query, or updated query result notifications for a persisted query may be provided automatically to a subscribed user profile.
The subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the benefits described herein. A particular implementation of the invention may provide all, some, or none of the benefits described herein. Although operations for the various techniques are described herein in a particular, sequential order for the sake of presentation, it should be understood that this manner of description encompasses rearrangements in the order of operations, unless a particular ordering is required. For example, operations described sequentially may in some cases be rearranged or performed concurrently. Moreover, for the sake of simplicity, flowcharts may not show the various ways in which particular techniques can be used in conjunction with other techniques.
Techniques described herein may be used with one or more of the systems described herein and/or with one or more other systems. For example, the various procedures described herein may be implemented with hardware or software, or a combination of both. For example, the processor, memory, storage, output device(s), input device(s), and/or communication connections discussed below with reference to
I. Exemplary Computing Environment
The computing environment (100) is not intended to suggest any limitation as to scope of use or functionality of the invention, as the present invention may be implemented in diverse general-purpose or special-purpose computing environments.
With reference to
Although the various blocks of
A computing environment (100) may have additional features. In
The storage (140) may be removable or non-removable, and may include computer-readable storage media such as flash drives, magnetic disks, magnetic tapes or cassettes, CD-ROMs, CD-RWs, DVDs, or any other medium which can be used to store information and which can be accessed within the computing environment (100). The storage (140) stores instructions for the software (180).
The input device(s) (150) may be one or more of various different input devices. For example, the input device(s) (150) may include a user device such as a mouse, keyboard, trackball, etc. The input device(s) (150) may implement one or more natural user interface techniques, such as speech recognition, touch and stylus recognition, recognition of gestures in contact with the input device(s) (150) and adjacent to the input device(s) (150), recognition of air gestures, head and eye tracking, voice and speech recognition, sensing user brain activity (e.g., using EEG and related methods), and machine intelligence (e.g., using machine intelligence to understand user intentions and goals). As other examples, the input device(s) (150) may include a scanning device; a network adapter; a CD/DVD reader; or another device that provides input to the computing environment (100). The output device(s) (160) may be a display, printer, speaker, CD/DVD-writer, network adapter, or another device that provides output from the computing environment (100). The input device(s) (150) and output device(s) (160) may be incorporated in a single system or device, such as a touch screen or a virtual reality system.
The communication connection(s) (170) enable communication over a communication medium to another computing entity. Additionally, functionality of the components of the computing environment (100) may be implemented in a single computing machine or in multiple computing machines that are able to communicate over communication connections. Thus, the computing environment (100) may operate in a networked environment using logical connections to one or more remote computing devices, such as a mobile computing device, a personal computer, a server, a router, a network PC, a peer device or another common network node. The communication medium conveys information such as data or computer-executable instructions or requests in a modulated data signal. A modulated data signal is a signal that has one or more of its characteristics set or changed in such a manner as to encode information in the signal. By way of example, and not limitation, communication media include wired or wireless techniques implemented with an electrical, optical, RF, infrared, acoustic, or other carrier.
The tools and techniques can be described in the general context of computer-readable media, which may be storage media or communication media. Computer-readable storage media are any available storage media that can be accessed within a computing environment, but the term computer-readable storage media does not refer to propagated signals per se. By way of example, and not limitation, with the computing environment (100), computer-readable storage media include memory (120), storage (140), and combinations of the above.
The tools and techniques can be described in the general context of computer-executable instructions, such as those included in program modules, being executed in a computing environment on a target real or virtual processor. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, libraries, objects, classes, components, data structures, etc. that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. The functionality of the program modules may be combined or split between program modules as desired in various embodiments. Computer-executable instructions for program modules may be executed within a local or distributed computing environment. In a distributed computing environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote computer storage media.
For the sake of presentation, the detailed description uses terms like “determine,” “select,” “receive,” “respond,” and “send” to describe computer operations in a computing environment. These and other similar terms are high-level abstractions for operations performed by a computer, and should not be confused with acts performed by a human being, unless performance of an act by a human being (such as a “user”) is explicitly noted. The actual computer operations corresponding to these terms vary depending on the implementation.
II. Search System and Environment
The client devices (204) and the search service (202) may be connected by a computer network (209), which may include a global computer network and/or one or more localized or proprietary computer networks, such as a wireless data network, a wide area network, a local area network, etc. Additionally, the search service (202) may be connected to an object store (210), which may be a single localized object store or a distribution of multiple object stores located on a single machine, or on multiple machines, in a single data center, spread across multiple data centers, etc. Objects in the object store (210) can include a variety of different types of computer-readable objects. For example, the objects may include searchable objects (212), which could include content objects such as documents (presentations, word processing documents, spreadsheets, Web pages, etc.), audio and/or video files, stored emails, entities (214) (e.g., user profiles or portal Web pages), etc.
The objects in the object store (210) may also include objects that are specific to query persistence features. For example, the object store (210) may include persisted queries (216), which are queries that are persisted in such a manner that the queries can be re-run at a later time. The object store (210) may also include subscription entries (218), which can each include an indication of one or more queries that are subscribed to, as well as one or more entities (214) that are subscribed to the one or more queries. The subscription entries (218) may also include other information, such as a start time of the subscription, an end time of the subscription, a frequency with which a check is to be done for updates, etc. The object store (210) may also include one or more associations (220) that associate one or more persisted queries (216) with one or more entities (214), so that the one or more entities can be provided with access to the persisted queries (216), such as by providing the entities (214) with representations of the persisted queries (216). For example, such representations could include a user interface item on a page for presentation in association with the entity (214). The entities (214), persisted queries (216), subscription entries (218), and associations (220) may be combined with each other and/or further separated out in particular implementations. For example, a persisted query (216) could be stored within a particular entity (214), thereby providing the association (220), which can be an implicit association by virtue of the location of the persisted query (216) within the entity (214).
Referring still to
Multiple different types of computer-readable data can be exchanged between the search service (202) and the client devices (204). For example, a client device (204) may receive user input (230), which may prompt the client device (204) to send data to the search service (202). For example, the user input (230) may define a graph query (240), and a first client application (206) in a client device (204) may send the graph query (240) to the search service (202), requesting that the search service (202) perform the requested graph query (240) and return query results (245) to that same first client application (206).
As another example, the first client application (206) may receive user input (230) requesting that the query be persisted. For example, this user input (230) may be in the form of a request to pin a representation of the graph query (240) (i.e., to keep the representation on one or more views when the representation may not otherwise remain in such views, whether or not this functionality is referred to using the term “pinning” or similar terms in the particular implementation). In response, the first client application (206) can send a persistence instruction (250) to the search service (202), requesting that the search service (202) persist the graph query. This persistence instruction (250) may be associated with an entity, such as a user profile logged into the first client application (206), or a portal page being displayed by the first client application (206). In response to such a request, the search service (202) can save the query identified in the persistence instruction (250) as a persisted query (216) in the object store (210), and can save an association (220) of the persisted query (216), which associates the persisted query (216) with the entity (214) that is associated with the persistence instruction (250). The search service (202) may later provide one or more of the client applications (206 and/or 208) with a query representation (260), which can represent a persisted query (216), and which can be presented on a client device (204), so that user input (230) can be provided on the client device (204) to select the query representation (260) and thereby select the corresponding persisted query (216). For example, the search service (202) may provide the query representation (260) as part of a Web page or a page for a specific client application (e.g., as user interface hyperlink, tile, button, etc.).
Similarly, user input (230) can be provided to request that an entity (214) be subscribed to an identified query. In response the search service can persist the identified query as a persisted query (216) if the query has not already been persisted. Additionally, the search service (202) can save a subscription entry (218) that associates a persisted query (216) with an entity (214) that is subscribing to the persisted query (216). The search service (202) can then monitor the object store for updates to the persisted query (216). For example, the persisted query (216) may be re-run periodically. As another example, the search service (202) and/or the object store (210) may monitor updates to the objects in the object store (210), and may determine whether each such update impacts a query that is the subject of a current subscription entry (218). Either way, the search service (202) may determine whether the update is sufficiently significant to warrant sending an update notification (270). For example, the search service (202) may examine a search ranking score of a new item added to the object store (210), such as a relevancy and/or importance score that is used in ranking query results (245) (e.g., a search engine combined feature score). For objects that are modified, the search service (202) may consider the extent and type of the modification, possibly in combination with a search result score for the modified item, in determining whether a threshold level is reached for warranting the sending of an update notification (270) to the entity (214) identified in the pertinent subscription entry (218). Such an update notification (270) may be sent to one or more client applications (206 and/208) on one or more client devices (204), which need not be the same client device (204) or client application (206 or 208) from which the subscription request (252) or the graph query (240) for that subscription was received (though they may be the same device/application in some situations).
User input (230) can be provided to select a persisted query (216), such as by providing user input directed at and selecting a representation of a persisted query (216). In response to such user input (230), a client application (206 or 208) can send a query selection (255) to the search service (202), requesting that the persisted query (216) be run, and that updated query results (245) be returned. In response to such a query, the search service (202) can run the query. In some examples, the persisted query (216) may have already been provided to the client application (206 or 208), such as where the persisted query (216) is contained within a Web page. In such a case, the query selection (255) may include the persisted query (216) itself. Alternatively, the query selection (255) may instruct the search service (202) to retrieve the persisted query (216) from the object store (210). Either way, the search service (202) can run the persisted query (216) and provide updated results to the client application (206 or 208), which may be a different type of client application (206 or 208) on a different type of client device (204) from one that provided that query and requested that it be persisted.
Referring now to
Additionally, a signal service (340) can intercept signals from the client domain (306), with the signals representing actions performed on and/or by the content objects from the content domain (304). For example, such signals may represent a content object being viewed by a user profile, edited by a user profile, connected as a friend to a user profile, one user profile being made a work colleague of another user profile, a document being created or edited by a particular user profile, etc. The signal service (340) can store representations of these signals in the signal storage (342), which can include representations of actions, as well as surrounding information (objects performing or receiving the actions, time of the actions, etc.). An analytics processing engine (350) can use the information from the signal storage (342) to populate a graph index (370) that represents the stored signals in an indexed manner for use by the core search engine (302) in performing graph queries. The graph index (370) and the item index (314) may each be a key value store, or one or both may be in some other format. Accordingly, the core search engine (302) can perform enterprise graph queries using both the item index (314) and the graph index (370). In running some queries only one or the other of the indexes (314 and 370) may be used, and in others, both of the indexes (314 and 370) may be used. The results of the queries can be ranked, such as with a ranker that includes multiple features that can be weighted and combined to arrive at ranking scores for the query results.
The client domain (306) can submit requests and instructions to the search service (300) through a client search API (380), which can pass such requests and instructions to a query and request processing component (382). For query requests, the query and request processing component (382) can pass processed queries to the core search engine (302) to be run using the item index (314) and/or the graph index (370). The core search engine (302) can pass results to a results processing component (384), which can process the query results and pass them back to the client domain (306) through the client search API (380). For client requests to persist queries and/or enter subscriptions, the query and request processing component (382) can process the requests and pass them to a query persistence component (386), which can persist queries, associations and/or subscription entries as needed in a persisted query data storage (390). The persisted queries can be provided to the core search engine (302) for use in running or re-running persisted queries in response to requests such as user input requests, or the queries can be run automatically to provide update notifications and/or updated query results to the client domain (306).
Some examples of user interface illustrations for persisted enterprise graph queries will now be discussed with reference to
The display (400) can include a pinning icon (430) adjacent to the definition (410). User input directed at and selecting the pinning icon (430) can be provided to indicate that the query represented by the definition (410) is to be persisted (and possibly that it is to be subscribed to as well), so that the query will be readily available at a later time. For example, a user's finger (440) may touch the area of the pinning icon (430) where the display (400) is on a touch screen. Similarly, the pinning icon could be selected by any of various other types of user input actions, such as a mouse click, a keyboard entry, a voice command, a non-touch gesture, etc. The term “pinning icon” refers to an icon that can be selected to “pin” a representation of the query, which refers to instructing the computer system to surface a representation of the query to the current display and/or other corresponding displays in other environments or views, even if that representation would not otherwise be surfaced in such environments or views (e.g., even if the query would not appear on a recent and/or frequent query list in such environments or views). Accordingly, a pinning icon may be in some form other than that of a pin, which is illustrated in
Referring now to
The display (500) can further include a pinned query region (540) that displays previously-pinned query representations (542), which represent queries that have been persisted in response to previous user input. For example, in the display (500), the pinned query region (540) includes the previously-pinned query representation (542) labeled “PRESENTED TO JOE JOHNSON ABOUT SALESFORCE,” which was pinned in a different client application, as discussed above with reference to
Though not shown in
Referring now to
III. Persisted Enterprise Graph Query Techniques
Several persisted enterprise graph query techniques will now be discussed. Each of these techniques can be performed in a computing environment. For example, each technique may be performed in a computer system that includes at least one processor and memory including instructions stored thereon that when executed by at least one processor cause at least one processor to perform the technique (memory stores instructions (e.g., object code), and when processor(s) execute(s) those instructions, processor(s) perform(s) the technique). Similarly, one or more computer-readable storage media may have computer-executable instructions embodied thereon that, when executed by at least one processor, cause at least one processor to perform the technique. The techniques discussed below may be performed at least in part by hardware logic.
Referring to
The technique of
The actor object set can include a user profile logged in at a client application running on the client device when the computer search service receives (730) the indication of user input instructing the search service to persist the enterprise graph query. The actor object set can be the user profile logged in at the client application running on the client device when the computer search service receives the indication of user input instructing the search service to persist the enterprise graph query. The actor object set can include a representation of a computer-readable portal page managed by a service that is remote from a client application that runs on the client device and interacts with the search service.
The relationship in the technique of
The technique of
The technique of
Referring now to
The first search client computer application can display (810) a first user interface item representing the persisted enterprise graph query. The first user interface item can be displayed in a first format. The first search client computer application of the first type can receive (820) user input associated with the entity, with the user input being directed at and selecting the first user interface item. In response to receiving (820) the user input directed at and selecting the first user interface item, the first client computer application can request (830) a search service to perform a first instance of the enterprise graph query. The first search client computer application can receive (840) back from the search service results of the first instance of the enterprise graph query. The first search client computer application can display (845) at least a portion of the results of the first instance of the enterprise graph query in response to receiving (820) the user input directed at and selecting the first user interface item.
The technique of
The first search client computer application may be a general Web browser, and the second search client computer application may be a specific application configured to interact with one or more remote enterprise computing services (e.g., a specific mobile application, a line of business desktop application, another specific desktop application, etc.).
The second search client computer application can be running on a mobile computing device (such as a handheld device (e.g., a smartphone or tablet) and/or a wearable computing device (e.g., a pair of computing glasses or a smart watch)) and the first search client computer application can be running on a computing device that is a different type from the mobile computing device. Additionally, the second search client computer application may be a mobile application.
The user input requesting that the enterprise graph query be persisted can include user input requesting that a visual representation of the enterprise graph query be pinned to a user interface display. The first search client computer application can receive user input requesting that the visual representation of the enterprise graph query be unpinned from the user interface display. The first search client computer application can request that the enterprise graph query cease from being persisted in response to receiving the user input requesting that the visual representation of the enterprise graph query be unpinned.
In one implementation of the technique of
The technique of
The technique of
Referring now to
The search service can the search service can automatically monitor (955) one or more updates to the results of the persisted enterprise graph query. The monitoring (955) can include determining that one or more updates to the results of the persisted enterprise graph query has a score that is above a threshold score for providing the entity with notifications. In response to determining that one or more updates to the results of the persisted enterprise graph query has a score that is above the threshold score for providing the entity with notifications, the technique can include automatically providing (960) the entity with notifications of the one or more updates to the results of the persisted enterprise graph query. The updates can include a modification of an existing computer-readable object represented by an item in the results of the persisted enterprise graph query and/or an addition of a new computer-readable object.
Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described above. Rather, the specific features and acts described above are disclosed as example forms of implementing the claims.
This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/188,079, entitled “PERSISTED ENTERPRISE GRAPH QUERIES,” filed on Feb. 24, 2014, and now U.S. Pat. No. 9,870,432, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6434556 | Levin et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6745195 | Kornfein | Jun 2004 | B1 |
7031961 | Pitkow et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7055168 | Errico et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7444344 | Galindo-Legaria et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7509320 | Hess et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7571121 | Bezos et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7577718 | Slawson et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7587101 | Bourdev | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7640236 | Pogue | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7756945 | Andreessen et al. | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7761447 | Brill et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7783630 | Chevalier et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7788245 | Eddings et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7873641 | Frieden et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7890501 | Lunt et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7945571 | Wanker | May 2011 | B2 |
7958116 | House et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7962481 | Ganesh et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8005817 | Amer-Yahia et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8060513 | Basco et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8065383 | Carlson et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8117197 | Cramer | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8204870 | Mukkamala et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8204888 | Frieden et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8209349 | Howes et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8214325 | Navas | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8266144 | Tankovich et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8301764 | Konig et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8312056 | Peng et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8341017 | Payne et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8341150 | Riley et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8346765 | Guo et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8346950 | Andreessen et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8380562 | Toebes et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8386515 | Bent et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8463795 | Van Hoff | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8538959 | Jin et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8548996 | Tareen et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8572477 | Moskovitz et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8600981 | Chau et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8601023 | Brave et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8751621 | Vaynblat et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8751636 | Tseng et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8775334 | Lloyd et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8782036 | Chen et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8799296 | Agapiev | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8812947 | Maoz et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8825649 | Heimendinger et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8825711 | Chan et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8874550 | Soubramanien et al. | Oct 2014 | B1 |
8886633 | Smyth et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8898156 | Xu et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8909515 | O'Neil et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8984098 | Tomkins et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
8996631 | Staddon et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
9165305 | Chandra et al. | Oct 2015 | B1 |
9177293 | Gagnon et al. | Nov 2015 | B1 |
9195679 | Svendsen | Nov 2015 | B1 |
9223866 | Marcucci et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9438619 | Chan et al. | Sep 2016 | B1 |
9514191 | Solheim et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9542440 | Wang et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9576007 | Sivathanu et al. | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9870432 | Holm et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
20010034859 | Swoboda et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020038299 | Zernik et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020091736 | Wall | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020169759 | Kraft et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030025692 | Lu et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030071814 | Jou et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030115271 | Weissman | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040103088 | Cragun | May 2004 | A1 |
20040255237 | Tong | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267736 | Yamane et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050076240 | Appleman | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050076241 | Appelman | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050201535 | LaLonde et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203929 | Hazarika et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050246420 | Little, II | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050278321 | Vailaya et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050278325 | Mihalcea et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004892 | Lunt et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060074883 | Teevan et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060123014 | Ng | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060168036 | Schulz et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060294085 | Rose et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070162443 | Liu et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070192306 | Papakonstantinou et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208751 | Cowan et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080005064 | Sarukkai | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080010337 | Hayes et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080010350 | Chen et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080016053 | Frieden et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080086344 | Martini et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097968 | Delgado et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20090049053 | Barker et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090094233 | Marvit et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090125560 | Munekuni et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090132490 | Okraglik | May 2009 | A1 |
20090132516 | Patel et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090150866 | Schmidt | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090182727 | Majko | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090256678 | Ryu | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090313295 | Blaxland et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327271 | Amitay et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100063878 | Bachet et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082695 | Hardt | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100083151 | Lanza et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100169320 | Patnam et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100169326 | Ma et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100179874 | Higgins et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100185610 | Lunt et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100223266 | Balmin et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100268703 | Buck | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100306185 | Smith et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100332330 | Goel et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110004831 | Steinberg et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110040617 | Moonka et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110055241 | Lewis | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110060803 | Berlin et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110087644 | Frieden et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110099167 | Galbreath et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110145275 | Stewart | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110145719 | Chen et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110214046 | Haberman et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110218946 | Stern et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110231381 | Mercuri | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110264737 | Skinner | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110271224 | Cruz Moreno et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120030169 | Allen et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120047114 | Duan et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120054303 | Priyadarshan et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120076367 | Tseng | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120078896 | Nixon et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120079004 | Herman | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120084291 | Chung et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120124041 | Bawri et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120158720 | Luan | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120158791 | Kasneci et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120209859 | Blount | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120209878 | Park et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120210240 | Neystadt et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120215771 | Steiner | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120215773 | Si et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120221558 | Byrne et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120221566 | Iwasa et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120239618 | Kung | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120254790 | Colombino et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120271807 | Smyth et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120290399 | England et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120290637 | Perantatos et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120296918 | Morris et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120304215 | McCarthy et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120310922 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120311139 | Brave et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120323998 | Schoen et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120324002 | Chen | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120324027 | Vaynblat et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120330908 | Stowe et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120330992 | Kanigsberg et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130006754 | Horvitz et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130013678 | Murthy | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130031489 | Gubin et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130036230 | Bakos | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130041896 | Ghani et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130054349 | Ogawa | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130073280 | O'Neil et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130073568 | Federov et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130073632 | Fedorov et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130073979 | Shepherd et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130073983 | Rasmussen et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130080218 | Wildern, IV et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130086057 | Harrington et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130091149 | Dunn et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130097143 | Shenoy et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130097184 | Berkhin et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130103683 | Haveliwala et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130110638 | Ogawa | May 2013 | A1 |
20130110802 | Shenoy et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130110827 | Nabar et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130110978 | Gordon et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130124437 | Pennacchiotti et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130124613 | Plache et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130132138 | Doganata et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130151611 | Graham et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130155068 | Bier et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130159096 | Santhanagopal et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130167059 | Legris | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130191416 | Lee et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130204706 | Tang et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130212081 | Shenoy et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130218885 | Satyanarayanan | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130218899 | Raghavan et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130227011 | Sharma et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130238449 | Ferreira et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130238587 | Annau et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130238588 | Annau et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130246404 | Annau et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130246405 | Annau et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130246521 | Schacht et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130262588 | Barak et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130268973 | Archibong et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130288715 | Shieh et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130290323 | Saib | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130298084 | Spivack et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130326369 | Buchanon | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130332523 | Luu | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130346329 | Alib-Bulatao et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140007860 | Lu | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140013353 | Mathur | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140032563 | Lassen et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140040008 | Belani et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140040244 | Rubinstein et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140040245 | Rubinstein et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140040246 | Rubinstein et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140040367 | Lessin et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140040370 | Buhr | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140040729 | Marlow et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140041038 | Lessin et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140046982 | Chan et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140074602 | van Elsas et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140074888 | Potter | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140074934 | van Hoff et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140114986 | Bierner et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140156652 | Abiola | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140164388 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140173459 | Gaiser et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140181083 | Macho et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140181091 | Lassen et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140188899 | Whitnah et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140189530 | Anand et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140195605 | Kallayil | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140207860 | Wang et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140208234 | Amit et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140215351 | Gansca et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140229293 | Huang et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140278986 | Rouse et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140280080 | Solheim et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140280108 | Dunn | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140282029 | Vishria | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140324850 | Magnaghi et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140330551 | Bao et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140330809 | Raina et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140330818 | Raina et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140330819 | Raina et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140337316 | Abuelsaad | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140344288 | Evans et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140359023 | Homsany | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150039596 | Stewart | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150039632 | Leppanen et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150058758 | Tseng | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150067505 | Metcalf et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150081449 | Ge et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150100644 | Gulik | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150106191 | Ge et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150120700 | Holm et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150127677 | Wang et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150142785 | Roberts et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150187024 | Karatzoglou et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150220531 | Helvik et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150242473 | Brugard et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150248222 | Stickler et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150248410 | Stickler et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150248480 | Miller et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150249715 | Helvik et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150294138 | Barak et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150363402 | Jackson et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150363407 | Huynh et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150379586 | Mooney et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150381552 | Vijay et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160034469 | Livingston et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160070764 | Helvik et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160117740 | Linden et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160203510 | Pregueiro et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20170072002 | Bafundo et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170091644 | Chung et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20190180204 | Stickler et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20200358864 | Helvik et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1666279 | Sep 2005 | CN |
102150161 | Aug 2011 | CN |
102298612 | Dec 2011 | CN |
102567326 | Jul 2012 | CN |
102693251 | Sep 2012 | CN |
102906689 | Jan 2013 | CN |
102930035 | Feb 2013 | CN |
2409271 | Jan 2012 | EP |
2426634 | Mar 2012 | EP |
2764489 | Aug 2014 | EP |
2008097969 | Aug 2008 | WO |
2008111087 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2010029410 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2012129400 | Sep 2012 | WO |
2013026095 | Feb 2013 | WO |
2013043654 | Mar 2013 | WO |
2013123550 | Aug 2013 | WO |
2013173232 | Nov 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Pradel et al., “Natural language query interpretation into SPARQL using patterns,” Fourth International Workshop on Consuming Linked Data—COLD 2013, Oct. 2013, Sydney, Australia. (Year: 2013). |
Brinkley et al., “A query integrator and manager for the Query Web,” Journal of biomedical informatics 45.5 (2012): 975-991. (Year: 2012). |
Yeung, Ken, “Yammer Unveils the Open Graph for the Enterprise, to Help make Business Apps More Social”, Retrieved From: «http://thenextweb.com/insider/2012/10/29/yammer-using-the-enterprise-graph/!utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+TheNextWeb+(The+Next+Web+All+Stories), Oct. 29, 2012, 3 Pages. |
Zhibao, et al., “EISI: An Extensible Security Enterprise Search System”, In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Science and network technology (ICCSNT), Dec. 29, 2012, pp. 896-900 |
“Corrected Notice of Allowance Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/188,079”, dated Dec. 18, 2017, 2 Pages. |
“8 Things Marketers Ought to Know About Facebooks New Trending Feature”, Retrieved from: https://web.archive.org/save/https://www.facebook.com/notes/brandlogist/8-things-marketers-ought-to-know-about-facebooks-new-trending-feature/650859898308191/, Jan. 30, 2014, 5 Pages. |
“Trending—Definition and Synonyms”, Retrieved from: https://web.archive.org/web/20170618063522/http://www.macmillandictionary.com:80/us/dictionary/american/trending, Jul. 18, 2014, 1 Page. |
Dayal, Priyanka, “How Many Tweets Make a Trend?”, Retrieved from https://www.vuelio.com/uk/blog/how-many-tweets-make-a-trend/, Aug. 28, 2013, 5 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/275,386”, dated Aug. 29, 2019, 36 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/064,393”, dated Mar. 4, 2019, 19 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in European Patent Application No. 15710632.9”, dated Feb. 18, 2019, 07 Pages. |
“First Office Action and Search Report Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580010703.5”, dated Mar. 8, 2019, 12 Pages. |
“First Office Action and Search Report Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580011895.1”, dated Mar. 5, 2019, 18 Pages. |
“Second Office Action and Search Report Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201480058874.0”, dated Jun. 26, 2019, 14 Pages. |
“Advisory Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/064,393”, dated Jun. 6, 2019, 6 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/192,235”, dated Jul. 25, 2019, 14 Pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/064,393”, dated Sep. 26, 2019, 20 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/192,235”, dated Dec. 26, 2018, 16 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/593,650”, dated Jan. 4, 2019, 35 Pages. |
“First Office Action & Search Report Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201480058874.0”, dated Dec. 5, 2018, 14 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/194,700”, dated May 20, 2019, 25 Pages. |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/195,243”, dated May 1, 2019, 10 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/296,747”, dated May 1, 2019, 30 Pages. |
Bakhshandeh, et al.,“Personalized Search Based on Micro-Blogging Social Networks”, In Proceedings of the CSI International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Signal Processing, May 2, 2012, 4 Pages. |
Mishra, et al., “Improving Mobile Search through Location Based Context and Personalization”, In Proceedings of the International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies, May 11, 2012, 5 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in European Patent Application No. 15771764.6”, dated May 13, 2019, 9 Pages. |
“Bing Ads targeting-training”, Retrieved From: https://web.archive.org/web/20160708102420/http://ads.bingads.microsoft.com/en-in/cl/245/training/bing-ads-targeting, Retrieved Date: Oct. 7, 2014, 4 Pages. |
“Campaign Element Template Parameters-Training”, Retrieved From: https://www-304.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSZLC2_7.0.0/com.ibm.commerce.management-center_customization.doc/concepts/csbcustargdef.htm, Retrieved Date: Oct. 1, 2014, 4 Pages. |
“Connections Enterprise Content Edition”, Retrieved From: http://www-03.ibm.com/software/products/en/connections-ecm/, Nov. 22, 2013, 6 Pages. |
“Enterprise Search from Microsoft”, In Microsoft White Paper, Jan. 2007, 16 Pages. |
“Facets for Enterprise Search Collections”, Retrieved From: http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/analytic/v3r0m0/index.tsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.discovery.es.ad.doc%2Filysafacets.htm, Retrieved on: Jun. 17, 2014, 2 Pages. |
“Getting started with your My Site”, Retrieved From: http://office.microsoft.com/en-in/sharepoint-server-help/getting-started-with-your-my-site-HA101665444.aspx, Apr. 6, 2013, 6 Pages. |
“How to Segment and Target Your Emails-Training”, Retrieved From: https://www.marketo.com/ebooks/how-to-segment-and-target-your-emails/, Aug. 15, 2014, 17 Pages. |
“Introduction to Managed Metadata”, Retrieved From: http://office.microsoft.com/en-001/office365-sharepoint-online-enterprise-help/introduction-to-managed-metadata-HA102832521.aspx, Retrieved on: Jun. 23, 2014, 5 Pages. |
Fox, Vanessa, “Marketing in the Age of Google”, In Book Marketing in the Age of Google: Your Online Strategy is Your Business Strategy, Published by Wiley Publishing, Mar. 20, 2012, 3 pages. |
“Persistent Search: Search's Next Big Battleground”, Retrieved From: http://billburnham.blogs.com/burnhamsbeat/2006/04/persistent_sear.html, Apr. 10, 2006, 3 Pages. |
“Turn search history off or on”, Retrieved From: https://web.archive.org/web/20131124065852/http://onlinehelp.microsoft.com/en-US/bing/ff808483.aspx, Retrieved Date: Dec. 12, 2013, 1 Page. |
“Yammer the Enterprise Social Network”, Retrieved From: https://about.yammer.com/product/feature-list/, Sep. 39, 2013, 6 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S Appl. No. 14/188,079”, dated Dec. 6, 2016, 30 Pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/188,079”, dated Apr. 21, 2017, 34 Pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/188,079”, dated Jul. 15, 2016, 30 Pages. |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/188,079”, dated Sep. 7, 2017, 7 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in European Patent Application No. 15710653.5”, dated Jul. 27, 2017, 8 Pages. |
Amitay, et al., “Social Search and Discovery using a Unified Approach”, In Proceedings of the 20th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, Jun. 29, 2009, pp. 199-208. |
Bailly, Nestor, “Finding the Best Video Content Using the Power of the Social Graph”, Retrieved From: https://web.archive.org/web/20130721151603/http://iq.intel.com/iq/35820000/finding-the-best-video-content-using-the-power-of-the-social-graph, Jul. 17, 2013, 5 Pages. |
Bobadilla, et al., “Recommender Systems Survey”, In Journal of Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 46, Jul. 1, 2013, pp. 109-132. |
Daly, et al., “Social Lens: Personalization around user Defined Collections for Filtering Enterprise Message Streams”, In Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Jul. 17, 2011, pp. 113-120. |
Diaz, et al., “SIGIR 2013 Workshop on Time Aware Information Access (#TAIA2013)”, In Proceedings of the 36th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Aug. 1, 2013, 41 Pages. |
Elbassuoni, et al., “Language-Model-Based Ranking for Queries on RDR-Graphs”, In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Nov. 2, 2009, 10 Pages. |
Fan, et al., “Tuning Before Feedback: Combining Ranking Discovery and Blind Feedback for Robust Retrieval”, In Proceedings of the 27th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Jul. 25, 2004, 8 Pages. |
Fazio, Stephanie, “How Social is Enterprise Search?”, Retrieved From: http://web.archive.org/web/20120318142232/http://blogs.opentext.com/vca/blog/1.11.647/article/1.26.2007/2012/3/14/How_Social_is_Enterprise_Search%3F», Mar. 14, 2012, 3 Pages. |
Giugno, et al., “GraphGrep: A Fast and Universal Method for Querying Graphs”, In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, vol. 2, Aug. 11, 2002, 4 Pages. |
Gruhl, et al., “The Web beyond Popularity—A Really Simple System for Web Scale RSS”, In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on World Wide Web, May 23, 2006, pp. 183-192. |
Guy, et al., “Finger on the Pulse: The Value of the Activity Stream in the Enterprise”, In Proceedings of the 14th IFIP TC 13th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Sep. 2, 2013, 18 Pages. |
Guy, et al., “Personalized Recommendation of Social Software Items Based on Social Relations”, In Proceedings of the Third ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, Oct. 23, 2009, pp. 53-60. |
Hackett, Wes, “Extending the Activity Feed with Enterprise Content”, In Proceedings of the ActivityFeed, Development, Featured, Sharepoint, Social Features, Jun. 16, 2011, 27 Pages. |
Hanada, Tetsuya, “Yammer- Enterprise Graph SharePoint”, In Australian Sharepoint Conference, Jun. 11, 2013, 23 Pages. |
Josh, “Send Notifications to your Customers in their Timezone-training”, Retrieved From: https://mixpanel.com/blog/2014/08/19/announcement-send-notifications-in-your-customer-s-timezone, Aug. 19, 2014, 1 Page. |
Kelly, et al., “The Effects of Topic Familiarity on Information Search Behavior”, In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Jul. 14, 2002, 2 Pages. |
Khodaei, et al., “Social-Textual Search and Ranking”, In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Crowdsourcing Web Search, Apr. 17, 2012, 6 Pages. |
Kubica, et al “cGraph: A Fast Graph-Based Method for Link Analysis and Queries”, In Proceedings of the IJCAI Text Mining & Link-Analysis Workshop, vol. 1, Aug. 22, 2003, 10 Pages. |
Kuppusamy, Ashok, “Introducing Delve (codename Oslo) and the Office Graph”, Retrieved From: https://web.archive.org/web/20160821142506/https://blogs.office.com/2014/03/11/introducing-codename-oslo-and-the-office-graph/, Mar. 11, 2014, 10 Pages. |
Liang et al., “Highlighting in Information Visualization: A Survey”, In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference Information Visualisation, Jul. 26, 2010, 7 Pages. |
Li, et al., “Personalized Feed Recommendation Service for Social Networks”, In Proceedings of the IEEE 2nd International Conference on Social Computing, Aug. 22, 2010, pp. 96-103. |
Li, et al., “Research of Information Recommendation System Based on Reading Behavior”, In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, vol. 3, Jul. 12, 2008, pp. 1626-1631. |
Masuch, Lukas, “Hack: Enterprise Knowledge Graph-One Graph to Connect them All”, Retrieved From: http://www.managementexchange.com/hack/enterprise-knowledge-graph-one-graph-connect-them-all, Mar. 28, 2014, 8 Pages. |
Muralidharan, et al., “Social Annotations in Web Search”, In Proceedings of the ACM Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, May 5, 2012, 10 Pages. |
“International Preliminary Report on Patentability Issued in Application No. PCT/US2016/012399”, dated Jul. 11, 2017, 9 Pages. |
Pecovnik, Simon “Enterprise Graph Search—take 1”, Retrieved From: https://www.ravn.co.uk/enterprise-graph-search/, Jan. 28, 2014, 5 Pages. |
Perer, et al., “Visual Social Network Analytics for Relationship Discovery in the Enterprise”, In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology, Oct. 23, 2011, pp. 71-79. |
Resnick, P., “Internet Message Format”, In Proceedings of Network Working Groups, Request for Comments: 5322, Obsoletes: 2822, Updates: 4021, Oct. 2008, 57 Pages. |
Ronen, et al., “Social Networks and Discovery in the Enterprise (SaND)”, In Proceedings of the 32nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Jul. 19, 2009, 1 Page. |
Roth, et al., “Suggesting Friends Using the Implicit Social Graph”, In Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Jul. 25, 2010, 9 Pages. |
Soussi, Rania, “Querying and Extracting Heterogeneous Graphs from Structured Data and Unstrutured Content”, In PHD Thesis, Doctor of Computer Science Prepared at Ecole Centrale Paris, RIADI Laboratory, Jun. 22, 2012, 208 Pages. |
Ubbesen, Christian, “Enterprise Graph Search”, Retrieved From: https://findwise.com/blog/enterprise-graph-search/, Jan. 28, 2013, 2 Pages. |
Yap, Jamie, “Graph Search Capabilities Offer Enterprise Benefits”, Retrieved From: http://www.zdnet.com/graph-search-capabilities-offer-enterprise-benefits-7000011304/, Feb. 14, 2013, 5 Pages. |
Yong Yin at al., An improved Search Strategy for Even Degree Distribution Networks, Jul. 2013, Academy Publisher, vol. 8, No. 7, pp. 1558-1565 (Year: 2013). |
Jason J. Jung, Understanding information propagation on online social tagging systems, Nov. 4, 2012, Springer Science+ Business Media, Edition or vol. 48, pp. 745-754 (Year: 2012). |
Barbie E. Keiser, Semisocial information Discovery, Novi Dec. 2013, Online searcher, pp. 16-22 (Year: 2013). |
Anthony Stefanidis et al., Harvesting ambient geospatial information from social media feeds, Dec. 4, 2011, GeoJoumal, Edition or vol. 78, pp. 319-338 (Year: 2011). |
“Second Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580011895.1”, dated Aug. 9, 2019, 6 Pages. |
“Second Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580010703.5”, dated Oct. 24, 2019, 5 Pages. |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/275,386”, dated Mar. 6, 2020, 10 Pages. |
Oyama, et al., “Analysis of Topics and Relevant Documents for Navigational Retrieval on the Web”, I Proceedings of International Workshop on Challenges in Web Information Retrieval and Integration, Apr. 8, 2005, 6 Pages. |
Chen, et al., “Towards Topic Trend Prediction on a Topic Evolution Model with Social Connection”, In Proceedings of ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, Dec. 4, 2012, 5 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/194,700”, dated Nov. 5, 2019, 27 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/296,747”, dated Jan. 30, 2020, 32 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2017/002699”, dated Feb. 14, 2020, 7 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580047507.5”, dated Apr. 3, 2020, 13 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/057,229”, dated Jun. 9, 2020, 8 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/064,393”, dated Jun. 12, 2020, 27 Pages. |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/194,700”, dated Apr. 15, 2020, 9 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/192,235”, dated Apr. 17, 2020, 16 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/296,747”, dated Sep. 3, 2020, 31 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/192,235”, dated Nov. 18, 2020, 17 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580047507.5”, dated Sep. 28, 2020, 14 Pages. |
“First Examination Report Issued in Indian Patent Application No. 201647027554”, dated Sep. 14, 2020, 5 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/296,747”, dated Jan. 4, 2021, 30 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580047507.5”, dated Jan. 11, 2021, 11 Pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180096076 A1 | Apr 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14188079 | Feb 2014 | US |
Child | 15833453 | US |