Personal care compositions with two benefit phases

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11207248
  • Patent Number
    11,207,248
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, November 10, 2015
    8 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 28, 2021
    2 years ago
Abstract
A personal care composition includes a structured cleansing phase and two separate benefit phases, wherein the first benefit phase containing a high viscosity benefit agent with an average particle size of about 50 μm to about 500 μm, wherein the second benefit phase comprises a low viscosity benefit agent with an average particle size of about 0.5 μm to about 10 μm.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure generally relates to personal care compositions comprising at least two benefit phases wherein the two or more benefit phases occupy separate physical domains of the personal care composition; and methods relating thereto.


BACKGROUND

Over time, skin cleansing has become part of a personal hygiene regimen. The cleansing of the skin allows for the removal of dirt, debris, bacteria, and a myriad of other things that can cause harm to the skin or the body. Cleansing is often done with the aid of a surfactant. The surfactant works to help remove deposited materials from the skin. Unfortunately, surfactants can also act to remove good things from the skin as well, like lipid. The lipid on the skin helps, for example, to protect the skin from losing too much moisture. Removal of too much lipid can leave the skin vulnerable to becoming dry. One solution for this problem is to utilize a milder surfactant. Another solution is to replace what is removed by depositing a benefit material on the skin. Historically, however, there has been a struggle to effectively deposit these benefit materials on the skin, especially in rinse off products like cleansers. As such, there is a need for personal care compositions that provide enhanced deposition of benefit materials on the skin.


SUMMARY

In one example, a personal care composition comprises: a) a structured cleansing phase comprising: i) from about 5% to about 20%, by weight of the personal care composition, of an anionic surfactant; ii) an amphoteric surfactant, a zwitterionic surfactant, or a combination thereof; and b) a first hydrophobic benefit phase having an average particle size of about 50 μm or more and comprising from about 0.1% to about 20%, by the weight of the personal care composition, of a high viscosity benefit agent; and c) a second benefit phase having an average particle size of about 10 μm or less and comprising from about 0.1% to about 20%, by the weight of the personal care composition, of a low viscosity benefit agent; wherein the two benefit phases occupy separate physical domains of the personal care composition.


In another example, a personal care composition, comprises: a) a cleansing phase comprising: i) from about 5.0% to about 15%, by weight of the composition, of sodium trideceth 2 sulfate; ii) from about 1.0% to about 4%, by weight of the composition, of cocoamidopropyl betaine; iii) from about 0.1 to about 1%, by weight of the composition, of cationic guar with a charge density of about 0.2 meq/g to about 2.0 meq/g; iv) a structuring system comprising an associative polymer and a non-associative polymer; and b) a first benefit phase comprising petrolatum, wherein the average particle size of the first benefit phase is from about 50 μm to about 500 μm; and c) a second benefit phase comprising soy bean oil, wherein the average particle size of the second benefit phase is from about 0.5 μm to about 10 μm.


These and other combinations will be better understood from the more detailed description below.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a process diagram for a manufacturing method for multiphase products.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

While the specification concludes with the claims particularly pointing and distinctly claiming the invention, it is believed that the present invention will be better understood from the following description.


The devices, apparatuses, methods, components, and/or compositions of the present invention can include, consist essentially of, or consist of, the components of the present invention as well as other ingredients described herein. As used herein, “consisting essentially of” means that the devices, apparatuses, methods, components, and/or compositions may include additional ingredients, but only if the additional ingredients do not materially alter the basic and novel characteristics of the claimed devices, apparatuses, methods, components, and/or compositions.


All percentages and ratios used herein are by weight of the total composition and all measurements made are at 25° C., unless otherwise designated.


All measurements used herein are in metric units unless otherwise specified.


I. DEFINITIONS

As used herein, the following terms shall have the meaning specified thereafter:


“Anhydrous” refers to those compositions, and components thereof, which are substantially free of water.


“Associative polymer” refers to a water-dispersible polymer comprising hydrophobic groups at an end or pendants to a hydrophilic backbone.


“High viscosity benefit agent” as used herein refers to a benefit agent with a viscosity of about 1000 cP or more at 25° C. as defined by the viscosity method under the Method Section.


“Low viscosity benefit agent” as used herein refers to a benefit agent with a viscosity of about 500 cP or less at 25° C. as defined by the viscosity method under the Method Section.


“Multiphase” refers to personal care compositions comprising at least two phases of which can be chemically distinct (e.g., a structured cleansing phase and a benefit phase). Such phases can be in direct physical contact with one another. A personal care composition can be a multiphase personal care composition where phases of the personal care composition can be blended or mixed to a significant degree, but still be physically distinct. In these situations, the physical distinctiveness is undetectable to the naked eye. The personal care composition can also be a multiphase personal care composition where phases of the personal care composition can be made to occupy separate and distinct physical spaces inside a package where the phases can be stored. In such an arrangement, the phases can be stored such that they are not in direct contact with one another (i.e., the phases are not separated by a barrier and the phases are not emulsified or mixed to any significant degree). The personal care composition can also be a multiphase personal care composition where the phases are in physical contact and are visually distinct. Visually distinct phases can take many forms (e.g., phases can appear as striped, marbled). The personal care composition can also include a combination of one or more of the above multiphase personal care compositions. In one such arrangement, one blended multiphase personal care composition can be stacked with another blended multiphase personal care composition to form a striped configuration. Additionally, blended multiphase personal care compositions distinguishable by color can be stacked as stripes wherein the blended multiphase personal care compositions can be otherwise similar in average composition.


“Non-associative polymer” refers to a water-dispersible polymer with a relatively uniform hydrophilic backbone lacking hydrophobic groups.


“Package” refers to any suitable container for a personal care composition including but not limited to a bottle, tottle, tube, jar, non-aerosol pump, and combinations thereof.


“Personal care composition” refers to compositions intended for topical application to skin or hair. Personal care compositions can be rinse-off formulations in which the product can be applied topically to the skin and/or hair and subsequently rinsed from the skin and/or hair with water. The product could also be wiped off using a substrate. In either case, it is believed at least a portion of the product is left behind (i.e., deposited) on the skin. The personal care compositions can also be used as shaving aids. The personal care compositions can be extrudable or dispensable from a package. The personal care compositions can exhibit a viscosity from about 1,500 cP to about 1,000,000 cP as measured by a viscosity method as described in the commonly owned patent application published on Nov. 11, 2004 under U.S. Publication No. 2004/0223991 A1 entitled, “Multiphase Personal Care Compositions” filed on May 7, 2004 by Wei, et al. The personal care compositions can be in the form of, for example, a liquid, semi-liquid cream, lotion, or gel and are intended for topical application to the skin and/or hair. Examples of personal care compositions can include but are not limited to shampoo, conditioning shampoo, body wash, moisturizing body wash, shower gels, skin cleansers, cleansing milks, hair and body wash, in shower body moisturizer, pet shampoo, shaving preparations, and cleansing compositions used in conjunction with a disposable cleansing cloth.


“STnS” refers to sodium trideceth(n) sulfate, wherein n can define the average number of moles of ethoxylate per molecule.


“Stable” refers to a personal care composition having a viscosity change of about 30% or less from an initial viscosity value after being rapidly aged for 10 days at 50° C.


“Structured” refers to having a rheology that can confer stability on the personal care composition. A degree of structure can be determined by characteristics determined by the Zero Shear Viscosity Method described below. Accordingly, a structured cleansing phase of the personal care composition can be considered to be structured if the structured cleansing phase has a Zero Shear Viscosity of about 20 Pascal-seconds (Pa-s) or more, about 200 Pa-s or more, about 500 Pa-s or more, about 1,000 Pa-s or more, about 1,500 Pa-s or more, or about 2,000 Pa-s or more. Other methods for determining characteristics which can define a degree of structure are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/157,665.


The phrase “substantially free of” as used herein, unless otherwise specified, means that the personal care composition comprises less than about 2%, less than about 1%, less than about 0.5%, or even less than about 0.1% of the stated ingredient. The term “free of”, as used herein, means that the personal care composition comprises 0% of the stated ingredient that is the ingredient has not been added to the personal care composition. However, these ingredients may incidentally form as a by-product or a reaction product of the other components of the personal care composition.


“Surfactant component” refers to a total of all anionic, nonionic, amphoteric, zwitterionic, and cationic surfactants in a phase. When calculations are based on the surfactant component, water and electrolytes can be excluded from the calculations involving the surfactant component since surfactants as manufactured can be diluted and neutralized.


“Visually distinct” generally refers to a region of the multiphase personal care composition having one average composition, as distinct from another region having a different average composition, wherein the regions can be visible to the unaided naked eye. This would not preclude distinct regions from comprising two similar multiphase personal care compositions or phases where one multiphase personal care composition or phase can comprise certain pigments, dyes, particles, and various optional ingredients, hence providing a region of different average composition (e.g., different textures or different colors).


II. PERSONAL CARE COMPOSITIONS

It can be difficult to both cleanse the skin to remove unwanted things like dirt and deposit beneficial things like benefit agents in the same process. However, this is exactly the goal to be accomplished in a personal care composition with benefit agents. One challenge is to deposit a sufficient amount of skin benefit agents without compromising the cleansing performance such as lather and after-use skin feel. Surfactants commonly used in cleansing compositions tend to diminish the deposition of skin benefit agents. One way to overcome the deposition challenge is through the use of highly viscous hydrophobic material such as petrolatum. But, petrolatum leaves skin greasy/coated which is undesirable for certain consumers. Alternatively, the low viscosity natural triglyceride oil is used in body wash to achieve clean skin feel. But, the low viscosity vegetable oil has poor deposition on skin with less skin benefits. Therefore, it is very difficult to achieve high benefit deposition on skin without compromising performance.


It was previously believed that a low viscosity benefit agent pre-thickened by a group of specific hydrophobic, non-anti-foaming polymers, like petrolatum, provides enhanced deposition of benefit agents in a cleansing composition without compromising lather performance. However, petrolatum is a well-known skin moisturizing agent and blending a low viscosity oil with petrolatum can negatively impact the deposition of petrolatum as skin benefit agent. For example, when petrolatum, a high viscosity benefit agent, is pre-blended with a low viscosity benefit agent, like soy bean oil, the deposition of the petrolatum is sacrificed, having a deposition of about 70 μg/cm2. Conversely, if the soy bean oil and petrolatum are added separately to the composition as separate benefit phases, the deposition of the petrolatum is greatly enhanced. A composition made in this fashion deposited from about 270 μg/cm2 to about 350 μg/cm2.


Without being limited by theory, it is believed that blending low viscosity and high viscosity benefit agents together results in a blended benefit phase with a smaller average particle size of about 10 μm or less, where the benefit agents are in a single domain. However, when the two benefit agents are added separately to a cleansing phase, the resulting composition has two different benefit phases with an average particle size of about 50 μm or more for the high viscosity benefit phase and an average particle size of about 10 μm or less for the low viscosity benefit phase and the two benefit phases occupy separate physical domains. It is believed that the larger particle size benefit agents tend to deposit better because of larger surface area of contact of the benefit agent with the skin surface which increases the adhesion and it becomes harder to remove the lipid particles on the skin with cleansing surfactant. Thus, maintaining the high viscosity benefit agent in separate domain helps to maintain its larger particle size and enhance its deposition. Thus, a personal care composition with a benefit phase with a particle size of about 50 μm or more are believed to have better deposition onto skin than those benefit phases with smaller particle sizes.


A. Structured Cleansing Phase


As noted herein, a personal care composition can include a structured cleansing phase and a benefit phase. The structured cleansing phase and the benefit phase can be in physical contact. The phases can be blended or mixed to a significant degree, but still be physically distinct such that the physical distinctiveness is undetectable to the naked eye. The phases can also be made to occupy separate and distinct physical spaces inside a package in which the phases can be stored. In such an arrangement, the structured cleansing phase and the benefit phase can be stored such that the phases are not in direct contact with one another. The structured cleaning phase and the benefit phase can be in physical contact while remaining visibly distinct to give, for example, a striped or marbled configuration.


The personal care composition can include a combination of one or more of the above multiphase personal care compositions. For example, one blended multiphase personal care composition can be stacked as stripes with another blended multiphase personal care composition.


The personal care composition can include a cleansing phase. The cleansing phase can comprise as least one anionic surfactant. The cleansing phase may contain from 3% to about 20%, from about 5% to about 15%, from about from about 7% to about 15%, from about 5% to about 13%, from about 5% to about 20%, or any combination of the upper, lower, and included limits within the ranges 2% to 30%, of surfactant, by weight of the personal care composition.


The cleansing phase may comprise a structured domain. The structured domain is preferably an opaque structured domain, which is preferably a lamellar phase. The lamellar phase can provide resistance to shear, adequate yield to suspend particles and droplets while providing long term stability because it is thermodynamically stable. The lamellar phase tends to have a viscosity that minimizes the need for viscosity modifiers, but they can be included if desired. The cleaning phase may comprise more than one surfactant.


The anionic surfactants can be either linear or branched. Examples of some suitable linear anionic surfactants include ammonium laureth sulfate, triethylamine lauryl sulfate, triethylamine laureth sulfate, triethanolamine lauryl sulfate, triethanolamine laureth sulfate, monoethanolamine lauryl sulfate, monoethanolamine laureth sulfate, diethanolamine lauryl sulfate, diethanolamine laureth sulfate, lauric monoglyceride sodium sulfate, sodium laureth sulfate, potassium laureth sulfate, sodium lauryl sarcosinate, sodium lauroyl sarcosinate, lauryl sarcosine, cocoyl sarcosine, ammonium cocoyl sulfate, sodium cocoyl isethionate, ammonium lauroyl sulfate, sodium cocoyl sulfate, sodium lauroyl sulfate, potassium cocoyl sulfate, potassium lauryl sulfate, monoethanolamine cocoyl sulfate, sodium tridecyl benzene sulfonate, sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate, and combinations thereof.


Examples of some suitable branched anionic surfactants include but are not limited to the following surfactants: sodium trideceth sulfate, sodium tridecyl sulfate, sodium C12-13 alkyl sulfate, sodium C12-15 alkyl sulfate, sodium C11-15 alkyl sulfate, sodium C12-18 alkyl sulfate, sodium C10-16 alkyl sulfate, sodium C12-13 pareth sulfate, sodium C12-13 pareth-n sulfate, sodium C12-14 pareth-n sulfate, and combinations thereof. Other salts of all the aforementioned surfactants are useful, such as TEA, DEA, ammonia, potassium salts. Useful alkoxylates include the ethylene oxide, propylene oxide and EO/PO mixed alkoxylates. Phosphates, carboxylates and sulfonates prepared from branched alcohols are also useful anionic branched surfactants. Branched surfactants can be derived from synthetic alcohols such as the primary alcohols from the liquid hydrocarbons produced by Fischer-Tropsch condensed syngas, for example Safol™ 23 Alcohol available from Sasol North America, Houston, Tex.; from synthetic alcohols such as Neodol™ 23 Alcohol available from Shell Chemicals, USA; from synthetically made alcohols such as those described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,335,312 issued to Coffindaffer, et al on Jan. 1, 2002. Suitable examples of alcohols are Safol™ 23 and Neodol™ 23. Suitable examples of alkoxylated alcohols are Safol™ 23-3 and Neodol™ 23-3. Sulfates can be prepared by conventional processes to high purity from a sulfur based SO3 air stream process, chlorosulfonic acid process, sulfuric acid process, or Oleum process. Preparation via SO3 air stream in a falling film reactor is a preferred sulfation process.


The anionic surfactant may also be STnS, wherein n can define average moles of ethoxylation. A structured cleansing phase can include from about 5% to about 20%, from about 7% to about 18%, from about 9% to about 16%, from about 11% to about 14%, by weight of the personal care composition, of STnS. A structured cleansing phase can include from 5% to 20%, from 7% to 18%, from 9% to 16%, from 11% to 14%, by weight of the personal care composition, of STnS. n can range from about 0 to about 3, from about 0.5 to about 2.7, from about 1.1 to about 2.5, from about 1.8 to about 2.2, or n can be about 2. When n is less than 3, STnS can provide improved stability, improved compatibility of benefit agents within the personal care compositions, and increased mildness of the personal care composition. Such described benefits of STnS are disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/157,665.


Further, the structured cleansing phase can comprise a structuring system wherein the structuring system can comprise an associative polymer and a non-associative polymer. The structuring system can comprise from about 0.01% to about 5%, from about 0.05% to about 1%, from about 0.07% to about 0.5%, or from about 0.1% to about 0.3%, by weight of the personal care composition, of a non-associative polymer. The structuring system can also comprise from 0.01% to 5%, from 0.05% to 1%, from 0.07% to 0.5%, or from 0.1% to 0.3%, by weight of the personal care composition, of a non-associative polymer. The structuring system can comprise from about 0.001% to about 5%, from about 0.005% to about 0.5%, from about 0.007% to about 0.05%, from about 0.008% to about 0.04%, or from about 0.01% to about 0.03%, by weight of the personal care composition, of an associative polymer. The structuring system can comprise from 0.001% to 5%, from 0.005% to 0.5%, from 0.007% to 0.05%, from 0.008% to 0.04%, or from 0.01% to 0.03%, by weight of the personal care composition, of an associative polymer.


Such associative polymers can be crosslinked, alkali swellable, associative polymers comprising acidic monomers and associative monomers with hydrophobic end groups, whereby the associative polymer comprises a percentage hydrophobic modification and a hydrophobic side chain comprising alkyl functional groups. Without intending to be limited by theory, it is believed the acidic monomers can contribute to an ability of the associative polymer to swell in water upon neutralization of acidic groups; and associative monomers anchor the associative polymer into structured surfactant hydrophobic domains, e.g., lamellae, to confer structure to the surfactant phase and keep the associative polymer from collapsing and losing effectiveness in the presence of an electrolyte. The crosslinked, associative polymer can comprise a percentage hydrophobic modification, which is a mole percentage of monomers expressed as a percentage of a total number of all monomers in a polymer backbone, including both acidic and other non-acidic monomers. Percentage hydrophobic modification of the associative polymer, hereafter % HM, can be determined by the ratio of monomers added during synthesis or by analytical techniques such as proton nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). Associative alkyl side chains can comprise, for example, butyl, propyl, stearyl, steareth, cetyl, lauryl, laureth, octyl, behenyl, beheneth, steareth, or other linear, branched, saturated, or unsaturated alkyl or alketh hydrocarbon side chains.


It has also been discovered that crosslinked, associative polymers having certain % HM and certain carbon numbers of hydrophobic end groups of alkyl side chains can provide significant enhancement of structure to personal care compositions comprising a structured surfactant, especially to personal care compositions comprising reduced levels of surfactant. Such associative polymers can also provide the above structure at surprisingly low levels of polymer structurant. Concentrations of associative polymers of up to about 5% or even 10% have been known to provide a sufficient amount structure (e.g., exemplary compositions of U.S. Pat. No. 7,119,059 (Librizzi, et al.) and U.S. Pat. No. 6,897,253 (Schmucker-Castner, et al.). It has been discovered that when an associative polymer % HM and an alkyl side chain number of carbons can be optimized, the structure of an aqueous structured surfactant phase can be increased using only less than about 3 wt %, less than about 2%, less than about 1%, and less than about 0.2%, of an associative polymer, as a percentage of an aqueous structured surfactant phase.


The acidic monomer can comprise any acid functional group, for example sulfate, sulfonate, carboxylate, phosphonate, or phosphate or mixtures of acid groups. The acidic monomer can comprise, for example, a carboxylate. Alternatively, the acidic monomer can be an acrylate, including acrylic acid and/or methacrylic acid. The acidic monomer can comprise a polymerizable structure, e.g., vinyl functionality. Mixtures of acidic monomers, for example acrylic acid and methacrylic acid monomer mixtures, may be useful as well.


The associative monomer can comprise a hydrophobic end group and a polymerizable component, e.g., vinyl, which can be attached. The hydrophobic end group can be attached to the polymerizable component, hence to the polymer chain, by different means but can be attached by an ether or ester or amide functionality, such as an alkyl acrylate or a vinyl alkanoate monomer.


The hydrophobic end group can also be separated from the chain, for example, by an alkoxy ligand such as an alkyl ether. The associative monomer can be, for example, an alkyl ester, an alkyl(meth)acrylate, where (meth)acrylate is understood to mean either methyl acrylate or acrylate, or mixtures of the two.


Sometimes, the hydrophobic end group of the associative polymer can be incompatible with the aqueous phase of the personal care composition and can associate with lathering surfactant hydrophobe components. Without intending to be limited by theory, it is believed that longer alkyl chains of structuring polymer hydrophobe end groups can increase incompatibility with the aqueous phase to enhance structure, whereas shorter alkyl chains having carbon numbers closely resembling lathering surfactant hydrophobes (e.g., 12 to 14 carbons) or multiples thereof (for bilayers, e.g.) can also be effective. An ideal range of hydrophobic end group carbon numbers combined with an optimal percentage of hydrophobic monomers expressed as a percentage of the polymer backbone can provide increased structure to the personal care composition comprising a structured surfactant with low levels of polymer structurant.


An exemplary associative polymer can include AQUPEC® SER-300 made by Sumitomo Seika of Japan, which is an acrylate/C10-C30 alkyl acrylate cross-polymer and comprises stearyl side chains with less than about 1% HM. Associative polymers can comprise about C16 (cetyl) alkyl hydrophobic side chains with about 0.7% hydrophobic modification, but a percentage hydrophobic modification can be up to an aqueous solubility limit in surfactant compositions (e.g., up to 2%, 5%, or 10%). Other associative polymers can include stearyl, octyl, decyl and lauryl side chains, alkyl acrylate polymers, polyacrylates, hydrophobically-modified polysaccharides, hydrophobically-modified urethanes, AQUPEC® SER-150 (acrylate/C10-C30 alkyl acrylate cross-polymer) comprising about C18 (stearyl) side chains and about 0.4% HM, and AQUPEC® HV-701EDR which comprises about C8 (octyl) side chains and about 3.5% HM, and mixtures thereof. Another exemplary associative polymer can be Stabylen 30 manufactured by 3V Sigma S.p.A., which has branched isodecanoate hydrophobic associative side chains.


As set forth above, the structured cleansing phase of a personal care composition can further include a non-associative polymer. Suitable non-associative polymers can include water-dispersible polymers with relatively uniform hydrophilic backbone lacking hydrophobic groups. Examples of non-associative polymers can include biopolymer polysaccharides (e.g., xanthan gum, gellan gum), cellulosic polysaccharides (e.g., carboxymethyl cellulose, carboxymethyl hydroxyethyl cellulose), other polysaccharides (e.g., guar gum, hydroxypropyl guar, and sodium alginate), and synthetic hydrocarbon polymers (e.g., polyacrylamide and copolymers, polyethylene oxide, polyacrylic acid copolymers).


Personal care compositions can additionally comprise an organic cationic deposition polymer in one or more phases as a deposition aid for the benefit agents described herein. Suitable cationic deposition polymers can contain cationic nitrogen-containing moieties such as quaternary moieties. Non-limiting examples of cationic deposition polymers can include polysaccharide polymers, such as cationic cellulose derivatives. Cationic cellulose polymers can be salts of hydroxyethyl cellulose reacted with trimethyl ammonium substituted epoxide, referred to in the industry (CTFA) as Polyquaternium 10, which can be available from Amerchol Corp. (Edison, N.J.) in their Polymer KG, JR, and LR series of polymers. Other suitable cationic deposition polymers can include cationic guar gum derivatives, such as guar hydroxypropyltrimonium chloride, specific examples of which can include the Jaguar series commercially available from Rhodia Inc. and N-Hance polymer series commercially available from Aqualon. Deposition polymers can have a cationic charge density from about 0.8 meq/g to about 2.0 meq/g or from about 1.0 meq/g to about 1.5 meq/g, or about 0.96 meq/g.


The personal care composition can be optionally free of or substantially free of sodium lauryl sulfate, hereinafter SLS, and/or ammonium lauryl sulfate, hereinafter ALS, and can comprise at least a 70% lamellar structure. However, in an alternative arrangement, the structured cleansing phase can comprise at least one surfactant, wherein the at least one surfactant includes SLS and/or ALS. Suitable examples of SLS are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/817,786.


A personal care composition can further comprise from about 0.1% to about 20%, by weight of the personal care composition, of a cosurfactant. The cosurfactant can comprise amphoteric surfactants, zwitterionic surfactants, or mixtures thereof. For example, a personal care composition can include an amphoteric surfactant and/or a zwitterionic surfactant. Suitable amphoteric or zwitterionic surfactants can include those described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,104,646 and 5,106,609.


Amphoteric surfactants can include those that can be broadly described as derivatives of aliphatic secondary and tertiary amines in which an aliphatic radical can be a straight or branched chain and wherein an aliphatic substituent can contain from about 8 to about 18 carbon atoms such that one carbon atom can contain an anionic water solubilizing group, e.g., carboxy, sulfonate, sulfate, phosphate, or phosphonate. Examples of compounds falling within this definition can be sodium 3-dodecyl-aminopropionate, sodium 3-dodecylaminopropane sulfonate, sodium lauryl sarcosinate, N-alkyltaurines such as the one prepared by reacting dodecylamine with sodium isethionate according to the teaching of U.S. Pat. No. 2,658,072, N-higher alkyl aspartic acids such as those produced according to the teaching of U.S. Pat. No. 2,438,091, and products described in U.S. Pat. No. 2,528,378. Other examples of amphoteric surfactants can include sodium lauroamphoacetate, sodium cocoamphoactetate, disodium lauroamphoacetate disodium cocodiamphoacetate, and mixtures thereof. Amphoacetates and diamphoacetates can also be used.


Zwitterionic surfactants suitable for use can include those that are broadly described as derivatives of aliphatic quaternary ammonium, phosphonium, and sulfonium compounds, in which aliphatic radicals can be straight or branched chains, and wherein an aliphatic substituent can contain from about 8 to about 18 carbon atoms such that one carbon atom can contain an anionic group, e.g., carboxy, sulfonate, sulfate, phosphate, or phosphonate. Other zwitterionic surfactants can include betaines, including cocoamidopropyl betaine.


Other suitable surfactants or cosurfactants that can generally be used in a structured cleansing phase for a personal care composition are described in McCutcheon's: Detergents and Emulsifiers North American Edition (Allured Publishing Corporation 1947) (1986), McCutcheon's, Functional Materials North American Edition (Allured Publishing Corporation 1973) (1992) and U.S. Pat. No. 3,929,678 (filed Aug. 1, 1974).


The structured cleansing phase of the personal care composition can also comprise water. The structured cleansing phase of the personal care composition can comprise from about 10% to about 90%, from about 40% to about 85%, or from about 60% to about 80%, by weight of the personal care composition, of water.


Other optional additives can be included in the cleaning phase, including, for example, an emulsifier (e.g., non-ionic emulsifier) and electrolytes. Suitable electrolytes can include anions such as phosphate, chloride, sulfate, citrate, and mixtures thereof and cations such as sodium, ammonium, potassium, magnesium, and mixtures thereof. For example, suitable electrolytes can include sodium chloride, ammonium chloride, sodium sulfate, ammonium sulfate, and mixtures thereof. Other suitable emulsifiers and electrolytes are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/157,665.


B. Benefit Phase


As noted herein, personal care compositions can include two or more benefit phases. The benefit phases can be hydrophobic and/or anhydrous. The benefit phases can also be substantially free of or free of surfactant.


The First Benefit Phase


The first benefit phase can comprise from about 0.1% to about 20%, by weight of the personal care composition, of a high viscosity skin benefit agent. The first benefit phase comprising a high viscosity benefit agent can have an average particle size of at least about 50 μm, at least about 100 μm, at least 200 μm, at least about 300 μm, to about 10,000 μm.


High viscosity benefit agents can include water insoluble or hydrophobic benefit agents. Examples of high viscosity benefit agents can include petrolatum, microcrystalline wax/mineral oil blends, paraffin wax/mineral oil blend, lanolin, lanolin derivatives, wax/mineral oil blends, triglyceride waxes, synthetic triglycerides, and combinations thereof. Other suitable high viscosity benefit agents are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/157,665.


High viscosity benefit agents can have a viscosity of about 1,000 cP or more at 25° C. In one example, the viscosity of the high viscosity benefit agent is greater than about 10,000 cP at 25° C. In another example, the high viscosity benefit agent has a viscosity of about 100,000 cP at 25° C. The viscosity of the high viscosity benefit agent can be up to about 1,000,000 cP at 25° C.


The Second Benefit Phase


A personal care composition can comprise a second benefit phase. A second benefit phase can comprise a low viscosity benefit agent. A low viscosity benefit agent has a viscosity of less than about 500 cP at 25° C. In one example, the low viscosity benefit agent has a viscosity of less than 100 cP at 25° C.


An example of a low viscosity benefit agent includes glycerides. Non-limiting examples of low viscosity glycerides suitable for use as low viscosity hydrophobic benefit agents herein can include soybean oil, sun flower seed oil, castor oil, safflower oil, corn oil, walnut oil, peanut oil, olive oil, cod liver oil, almond oil, avocado oil, palm oil, sesame oil, vegetable oils, vegetable oil derivatives, coconut oil and derivatized coconut oil, cottonseed oil and derivatized cottonseed oil, jojoba oil, and combinations thereof.


Another example of a low viscosity benefit agent is SEFOSE® which includes one or more types of sucrose polyesters. Sucrose polyesters are derived from a natural resource and therefore, the use of sucrose polyesters as the benefit agent can result in a positive environmental impact. Sucrose polyesters are polyester materials having multiple substitution positions around the sucrose backbone coupled with the chain length, saturation, and derivation variables of the fatty chains. Such sucrose polyesters can have an esterification (“IBAR”) of greater than about 5. For example, the sucrose polyester may have an IBAR of about 5 to about 8. In another example, the sucrose polyester may have an IBAR of about 5-7; in another example, the sucrose polyester can have an IBAR of about 6. In yet another example, the sucrose polyester can have an IBAR of about 8. As sucrose polyesters can be derived from natural resources, a distribution in the IBAR and chain length may exist. For example, a sucrose polyester having an IBAR of 6 may contain a mixture of mostly IBAR of about 6, with some IBAR of about 5, and some IBAR of about 7. Additionally, such sucrose polyesters may have a saturation or iodine value (“IV”) of about 3 to about 140. In another example, the sucrose polyester may have an IV of about 10 to about 120. In yet another example, the sucrose polyester may have an IV of about 20 to 100. Further, such sucrose polyesters may have a chain length of about C12 to C20.


Non-limiting examples of alkyl esters suitable for use as low viscosity hydrophobic benefit agents herein can include isopropyl esters of fatty acids and long chain esters of long chain (i.e. C10-C24) fatty acids, e.g., cetyl ricinoleate, non-limiting examples of which can include isopropyl palmitate, isopropyl myristate, cetyl riconoleate, and stearyl riconoleate. Other examples can include hexyl laurate, isohexyl laurate, myristyl myristate, isohexyl palmitate, decyl oleate, isodecyl oleate, hexadecyl stearate, decyl stearate, isopropyl isostearate, diisopropyl adipate, diisohexyl adipate, dihexyldecyl adipate, diisopropyl sebacate, acyl isononanoate lauryl lactate, myristyl lactate, cetyl lactate, and combinations thereof.


Non-limiting examples of silicone oils suitable for use as low viscosity hydrophobic benefit agents herein can include dimethicone copolyol, dimethylpolysiloxane, diethylpolysiloxane, mixed C1-C30 alkyl polysiloxanes, phenyl dimethicone, dimethiconol, and combinations thereof. Non-limiting examples of silicone oils useful herein are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,011,681. Still other suitable low viscosity hydrophobic skin benefit agents can include milk triglycerides (e.g., hydroxylated milk glyceride) and polyol fatty acid polyesters.


C. Other Optional Materials


Additional optional materials can also be added to the personal care composition to treat the skin, or to modify the aesthetics of the personal care composition as is the case with perfumes, colorants, dyes, or the like. Optional materials useful in products herein can be categorized or described by their cosmetic and/or therapeutic benefit or their postulated mode of action or function. However, it can be understood that actives and other materials useful herein can, in some instances, provide more than one cosmetic and/or therapeutic benefit or function or operate via more than one mode of action. Therefore, classifications herein can be made for convenience and cannot be intended to limit a material to a particularly stated application or applications listed. A precise nature of these optional material and levels of incorporation thereof, will depend on the physical form of the personal care composition and the nature of the cleansing operation for which it is to be used. Optional materials can usually be formulated at about 6% or less, about 5% or less, about 4% or less, about 3% or less, about 2% or less, about 1% or less, about 0.5% or less, about 0.25% or less, about 0.1% or less, about 0.01% or less, or about 0.005% or less by weight of the personal care composition.


The personal care composition can also comprise a benefit component that can be selected from the group consisting of thickening agents; preservatives; antimicrobials; fragrances; chelators (e.g., such as those described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,487,884 issued to Bisset, et al.); sequestrants; vitamins (e.g., Retinol); vitamin derivatives (e.g., tocophenyl actetate, niacinamide, panthenol); sunscreens; desquamation actives (e.g., such as those described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,681,852 and 5,652,228 issued to Bisset); anti-wrinkle/anti-atrophy actives (e.g., N-acetyl derivatives, thiols, hydroxyl acids, phenol); anti-oxidants (e.g., ascorbic acid derivatives, tocophenol) skin soothing agents/skin healing agents (e.g., panthenoic acid derivatives, aloe vera, allantoin); skin lightening agents (e.g., kojic acid, arbutin, ascorbic acid derivatives) skin tanning agents (e.g., dihydroxyacteone); anti-acne medicaments; essential oils; sensates; pigments; colorants; pearlescent agents; interference pigments (e.g., such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,395,691 issued to Liang Sheng Tsaur, U.S. Pat. No. 6,645,511 issued to Aronson, et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,759,376 issued to Zhang, et al, U.S. Pat. No. 6,780,826 issued to Zhang, et al.) particles (e.g., talc, kolin, mica, smectite clay, cellulose powder, polysiloxane, silicas, carbonates, titanium dioxide, polyethylene beads) hydrophobically modified non-platelet particles (e.g., hydrophobically modified titanium dioxide and other materials described in a commonly owned, patent application published on Aug. 17, 2006 under Publication No. 2006/0182699A, entitled “Personal Care Compositions Containing Hydrophobically Modified Non-platelet particle filed on Feb. 15, 2005 by Taylor, et al.) and mixtures thereof. The personal care compositions can comprise from about 0.1% to about 4%, by weight of the personal care composition, of hydrophobically modified titanium dioxide. Other such suitable examples of such skin actives are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/157,665.


Other optional materials can be those materials approved for use in cosmetics and that are described in the CTFA Cosmetic Ingredient Handbook, Second Edition, The Cosmetic, Toiletries, and Fragrance Association, Inc. 1988, 1992.


III. METHOD OF MANUFACTURING

The personal care compositions as described herein can be manufactured by a multi-benefit stream method. In this method, the components of the cleansing phase are added in a tank with simple mixing to blend the components together. A benefit phase comprising a high viscosity benefit agent is placed into a separate tank and heated to between 50° C. to 80° C. (or above its melting point, whichever is greater). An additional benefit phase comprising a low viscosity benefit agent is placed into a second tank and heated to 20° C.-60° C. (or above its melting point, whichever is greater). Once the components of the cleansing phase are mixed, one of the benefit phases is added to the cleansing phase by injecting the benefit phase into a mixing device such as a static mixer, rotor-stator device, recirculation loop, or into a mixing zone in a mix tank, with the cleansing phase. The remaining benefit phase is then added to the composition in a fashion similar to that of the first benefit phase. This differs from traditional manufacturing where the benefit agents are combined in a single tank, heated, and added to the surfactant phase by simple mixing. The benefit of adding two lipid streams via two different injection points is the creation of two separate particle size domains.


IV. TEST METHODS

A. T-Bar Viscosity Method


The viscosity of a personal care composition can be assessed by the T-Bar Viscosity Method. The apparatus for T-Bar measurements includes a Brookfield DV-II+ Pro Viscometer with Helipath Accessory; a chuck, weight and closer assembly for T-bar attachment; a T-bar Spindle D, a personal computer with Rheocalc software from Brookfield, and a cable connecting a Brookfield Viscometer to a computer. First, weigh 80 grams of a personal care composition in a 4-oz. glass jar. Measure a T-bar viscosity by carefully dropping the T-Bar Spindle to an interior bottom of the glass jar and set the Helipath stand to travel in an upward direction. Open the Rheocalc software and set the following data acquisition parameters: Speed to 5 rpm, Time Wait for Torque to 00:01 (1 second), and Loop Start Count to 100. Start data acquisition and turn on the Helipath stand to travel upward at a speed of 22 mm/minute. The T-Bar viscosity is an average T-Bar viscosity reading between the 10th reading and the 90th reading (the first ten readings and the last ten readings are not used for the average T-Bar viscosity calculation). The T-Bar viscosity reading is provided in cP. After obtaining the initial viscosity reading, place the personal care composition at 50° C. for 10 days for rapid aging. After finishing the stability testing at 50° C., the sample is equilibrated at 25° C. for 24 hours. Then repeat viscosity measurement to obtain final viscosity. Measure percent change of the initial viscosity from the final viscosity measurement to obtain the percent change in viscosity.


B. Zero Shear Viscosity and Young's Modulus Methods


The Zero Shear Viscosity of a material which is a phase or a component of the personal care composition, can be measured either prior to combining in the personal care composition, after preparing a composition, or first separating a phase or component from a personal care composition by suitable physical separation means, such as centrifugation, pipetting, cutting away mechanically, rinsing, filtering, or other separation means.


A controlled stress rheometer such as a TA Instruments AR2000 Rheometer is used to determine the Zero Shear Viscosity. The determination is performed at 25° C. with a 4 cm diameter parallel plate measuring system and a 1 mm gap. The geometry has a shear stress factor of 79580 m-3 to convert torque obtained to stress. Serrated plates can be used to obtain consistent results when slip occurs.


First, material is positioned on a rheometer base plate; the measurement geometry (upper plate) is moved into position 1.1 mm above the base plate. Excess material at the geometry edge is removed by scraping after locking the geometry. The geometry is then moved to the target 1 mm position above the base plate and a pause of about 2 minutes is allowed to allow loading stresses to relax. This loading procedure ensures no tangential stresses are loaded at the measurement onset which can influence the results obtained. If the material comprises particles discernible to the eye or by feel (e.g., beads) that are larger than about 150 microns in number average diameter, the gap setting between the base plate and upper plate is increased to the smaller of 4 mm or 8-fold the diameter of the 95th volume percentile particle diameter. If a phase has any particle larger than 5 mm in any dimension, the particles are removed prior to the measurement.


The measurement is performed by applying a continuous shear stress ramp from 0.1 Pa to 1,000 Pa over a time interval of 4 minutes using a logarithmic progression, i.e., measurement points evenly spaced on a logarithmic scale. Thirty measurement points per decade of stress increase are obtained. If the measurement result is incomplete, for example, if material is observed to flow from the gap, results obtained are evaluated with incomplete data points excluded. If there are insufficient points to obtain an accurate measurement, the measurement is repeated with increased number of sample points.


The Young's Modulus (Pa) is obtained by graphing Stress (Pa) vs. Strain (unitless) and obtaining a slope of a regression line of an initial linear region between Stress vs. Strain, typically occurring in the region below about 4% strain. If the relationship is not linear, the linear regression line slope below 2% strain is taken as the Young's Modulus (Pa), using unitless strain.


The Zero Shear Viscosity is obtained by taking a first median value of viscosity in Pascal-seconds (Pa-s) for viscosity data obtained between and including 0.1 Pa and a point where viscosity begins to steeply decline. After taking the first median viscosity, all viscosity values greater than 5-fold the first median value and less than 0.2× the median value are excluded, and a second median viscosity value is obtained of the same viscosity data, excluding the indicated data points. The second median viscosity so obtained is the Zero Shear Viscosity.


As set forth above, a structured cleansing phase can be considered to be structured if the structured cleansing phase has a Zero Shear Viscosity of about 200 Pa-s or more, about 500 Pa-s or more, about 1,000 Pa-s or more, about 1,500 Pa-s or more, or about 2,000 Pa-s or more.


C. Benefit Agent Viscosity Method


A controlled stress rheometer such as a TA Instruments AR2000 Rheometer is used to determine the Viscosity of benefit agent. The determination is performed at 25° C. with a 4 cm diameter parallel plate measuring system and a 1 mm gap. The geometry has a shear stress factor of 79580 m-3 to convert torque obtained to stress. Serrated plates can be used to obtain consistent results when slip occurs.


First, the benefit material is positioned on a rheometer base plate; the measurement geometry (upper plate) is moved into position 1.1 mm above the base plate. Excess material at the geometry edge is removed by scraping after locking the geometry. The geometry is then moved to the target 1 mm position above the base plate and a pause of about 2 minutes is allowed to allow loading stresses to relax. This loading procedure ensures no tangential stresses are loaded at the measurement onset which can influence the results obtained. If the material comprises particles discernible to the eye or by feel (e.g., beads) that are larger than about 150 microns in number average diameter, the gap setting between the base plate and upper plate is increased to the smaller of 4 mm or 8-fold the diameter of the 95th volume percentile particle diameter. If a phase has any particle larger than 5 mm in any dimension, the particles are removed prior to the measurement.


The measurement is performed by applying a continuous shear stress ramp from 0.1 Pa to 1,000 Pa over a time interval of 4 minutes using a logarithmic progression, i.e., measurement points evenly spaced on a logarithmic scale. Thirty measurement points per decade of stress increase are obtained. If the measurement result is incomplete, for example, if material is observed to flow from the gap, results obtained are evaluated with incomplete data points excluded. If there are insufficient points to obtain an accurate measurement, the measurement is repeated with increased number of sample points.


The Viscosity of the benefit agent is obtained by graphing Viscosity (Pa·S) vs. Shear Rate (/s) and obtaining consistency value (K) and shear index (n) through a power law fit. The consistency value (K) is defined as the benefit phase/agent viscosity.


D. Third-Phase Method for Determining Structured Surfactant Stability


A Third-Phase Method can be used to determine structured surfactant phase stability in a personal care composition. The method involves placing the personal care compositions at 50° C. for 10 days for rapid aging. After rapid aging, transfer about 4 grams of the personal care composition into a Beckman Centrifuge Tube (11 mm×60 mm) Place the centrifuge tube in a Beckman LE-80 Ultracentrifuge and operate the ultracentrifuge under the following conditions: 50,000 rpm, 2 hours, and 40° C.


After ultracentrifugation, determine the third-phase volume by measuring a height for each of various surfactant phases using an Electronic Digital Caliper (within 0.01 mm)


A very top layer is a hydrophobic benefit phase layer (e.g., hydrocarbons or soybean oil). The layers below the hydrophobic benefit phase layers containing surfactant/water can determined by the following: Ha is a height of all layers containing surfactant/water and Hb is a height of a clear “third-phase” layer just below the hydrophobic benefit phase layer. It is important to record the readings within 30 minutes after the ultracentrifugation is finished to minimize material migration across different layers. The third phase volume is calculated as: Third-Phase Volume %=Hb/Ha*100%.


A personal care composition comprising a structured surfactant can comprises less than about 10% “third-phase” volume, less than about 5% “third-phase” volume, less than about 2% “third-phase” volume, or less than about 1% “third-phase” volume after rapid aging stability protocol. In another arrangement, the personal care composition comprising a structured surfactant can comprise about 0% “third-phase” volume after rapid aging protocol.


E. Ultracentrifugation Method


The Ultracentrifugation Method is a physical method used to determine an amount of structure in a personal care composition or a subset of a personal care composition. The method can also be used to determine a rate at which a personal care composition comprising a structured surfactant dissolves upon dilution to present effective amounts of surfactant to a cleaning environment proximal to surfaces.


A personal care composition can be separated by ultracentrifuge into separate but distinguishable layers. The personal care composition can have multiple distinguishable layers (e.g., a structured surfactant layer and a benefit layer).


First, dispense about 4 grams of the personal care composition into a Beckman Centrifuge Tube (11 mm×60 mm) to fill the tube. Next, dilute the personal care composition to a 10% Dilution Level using 90% of the personal care composition and 10% DI water using an appropriate mixer and dispense an equal amount of the personal care composition into a companion centrifuge tube. Continue to dilute the personal care composition and fill tubes in the same manner until a 60% Dilution Level is obtained for the personal care composition using 40% of the personal care composition with 60% DI water. Place the centrifuge tubes in an ultracentrifuge (Beckman Model L8-M or equivalent) using a sling rotor and ultracentrifuge using the following conditions: 50,000 rpm, 2 hours, and 40° C.


Measure relative phase volumes for each phase of the personal care composition by measuring a height for each layer using an Electronic Digital Caliper (within 0.01 mm) Layers are identified by those skilled in the art by physical observation techniques paired with chemical identification if needed. For example, the structured surfactant layer can be identified by transmission electron microscopically (TEM), polarized light microscopy, and/or X-ray diffraction as a structured lamellar phase comprising multilamellar vesicles, and the hydrophobic benefit layer can be identified by its low moisture content (less than about 10% water as measured by Karl Fischer Titration). Measure a total height Ha, which includes all materials in the ultracentrifuge tube. Next, the height of each layer is measured from a bottom of the centrifuge tube to a top of the layer, and the span of each layer can be algebraically determined by subtraction. The benefit layer may comprise several layers. If the benefit phase splits, a sum of the benefit layers measured is the benefit layer height, Hb. Generally, a hydrophobic benefit layer, when present, is at a top of the centrifuge tube.


The surfactant phase may comprise several layers or a single layer, Hc. There may also be a micellar, unstructured, clear isotropic layer at the bottom or next to the bottom of the ultracentrifuge tube. Layers immediately above the isotropic phase generally comprise higher surfactant concentration with higher ordered structures (such as liquid crystals). Such structured layers can be opaque to naked eyes, or translucent, or clear. If several structured layers are present, Hc is a sum of individual structured layers. If any type of polymer-surfactant phase is present, it is considered a structured phase and included in the measurement of Hc. A sum of aqueous phases is Hs.


Finally, the structured domain volume ratio is calculated as follows:

Structured Domain Volume Ratio=Hc/Hs*100%


If there is no benefit phase present, use the total height as the surfactant layer height, Hs=Ha. The Structured Domain Volume Ratio is the Lamellar Phase %. The measurement is made for each dilution prepared and centrifuged (i.e., the Structured Domain Volume Ratio is determined for the composition, and for 90%, 80%, 70% and 60% dilutions prepared as indicated above).


The highest amount of dilution (i.e., the lowest Dilution Level) wherein the personal care composition maintains at least 95% Lamellar Phase % is an indicator of amount of structure for personal care compositions having varying n values for STnS.


The highest dilution wherein the personal care composition has at least 95% lamellar phase is greater than about 15%, greater than about 25%, or greater than about 35%.


The personal care composition has a Structured Domain Volume Ratio of greater than about 40%, greater than about 45%, greater than about 50%, greater than about 55%, greater than about 60%, greater than about 65%, greater than about 70%, greater than about 75%, greater than about 80%, greater than about 85%, or greater than about 90%, by volume of personal care composition comprising an aqueous surfactant.


F. Benefit Phase Particle Size Measurement


Benefit phase particle size is measured in neat product under a differential interference contrast optical microscope with a 10× objective lens. The particle size distribution is counted manually. All lipid particles are assumed as uniform spheres in this application. For irregular shaped lipid particles, the longest axis is used as the diameter for the particle size distribution counting. The number weighted average of all lipid particles is defined as the average benefit phase particle size.


G. In-vitro Deposition Method


In-Vitro Deposition Evaluation Method:


The In-vitro Deposition Evaluation Method measures the deposition of benefit agents on a skin mimic. The method compares the quantity of benefit agent of the skin mimic surface before and after cleansing in an automated cleansing unit, such as the automated cleansing unit described in co-pending and co-assigned Multiphase Personal Care Composition With Enhanced Deposition, U.S. application Ser. No. 12/510,880 (filed Jul. 28, 2009) and In-Vitro Deposition Evaluation Method for Identifying Personal Care Compositions Which Provide Improved Deposition of Benefit Agents, U.S. application Ser. No. 12/511,034 (filed Jul. 28, 2009).


The In-vitro Deposition Evaluation Method uses two 12-well plates (hereinafter referred to as “plates”). Suitable 12-well plates are commercially available from Greiner bio-one. For example, the Cellstar® 12 well suspension culture plate has 3 rows and 4 columns with a well volume of about 6.2 mL. The Cellstar® 12 well suspension culture plate comprises the approximate dimensions of 19 mm in height, 127 mm in length and 85 mm in width. The Cellstar® 12 well suspension culture plate has a well diameter of 23 mm, a well depth of 15 and a well to well spacing of 2 mm. A Cellstar® 12 well suspension culture plate is provided for containing the samples comprising the personal care composition in the Examples above.


The In-vitro Deposition Evaluation Method uses approximately 120 g of bodies for two plates. Five grams of bodies carefully loaded into each of the 12 wells of the two plates to ensure the same quantity is loaded into each well. Each body is a spherical stainless steel bearing that is approximately 2 mm in circumference. Each body comprises ferrometallic material. Suitable bodies are those available from WLB Antriebeselemente Gmbh, Scarrastrasse 12, D-68307 Mannheim, Germany.


The personal care compositions are prepared according to the description in the Example Section above. After the examples of the personal care compositions are prepared, control and test samples are prepared by determining the dilution ratio and dispensing both the personal care composition and distilled water into the wells of the microplate and allow the samples to mix while being exposed to the automated washing process. The dilution ratio used in this application is one part of composition and twenty nine parts of water (1:29). A pre-calibrated positive displacement pipette is used to dispense 66.7 μL of composition on to the bodies in each well, followed by dispensing 1933.3 μL of distilled water into each well. The control samples and test samples are dispensed in the specified wells of the plate, all within a 20 minute time frame. Each composition is placed in 6 different well, 3 of which are in plate 1 and the other 3 well are in plate 2. A test control composition containing the benefit agent should be used in every test to ensure consistency among tests.


The skin mimic used in the In-vitro Deposition Evaluation Method is comprised of a molded bicomponent polyurethane substrate. The skin mimic is textured on one side with a pattern that resembles the texture of human skin. The textured side of the skin mimic is coated with 1,1,1-trimethyl-1-pentene that is plasma deposited. The skin mimic surface has a total surface energy of 32±1.0 (mJ/m2) and a contact angle in water of 100°±2.0. Suitable skin mimic surface materials are described in co-pending and co-assigned Coated Substrate with Properties of Keratinous Tissue, U.S. Patent Pub. No. 20070128255A1 (filed Aug. 11, 2006) (published Jun. 7, 2007) and Methods of Use of Substrate Having Properties of Keratinous Tissue, U.S. Patent Pub. No. 20070288186A1 (filed Feb. 5, 2007) (published Dec. 13, 2007).


After all of the wells of the plate are filled with the samples and the pieces of skin are made and coated, the skin mimic is prepared for the In-vitro Deposition Evaluation Method. Two pieces of skin mimic are prepared by cutting the skin mimic to fit on top of all 12 openings of the wells of the plate while wearing gloves. The two pieces of skin mimic pieces are numbered “1” and “2”.


Next, the pieces of skin mimics are arranged over the openings of the wells of the microplates. The pieces of skin mimic surface material are transferred to cover the openings of the wells of the each of the plates to ensure that the textured and treated region of the skin mimic is facing the openings of the wells of the plate. A lid is placed over each piece of the skin mimic and the associated plate to form a lidded plate.


The lidded plates are placed into plate holders of an automated cleansing unit, or, a device used in the in-vitro Deposition Evaluation Method of the present invention. The automated cleansing unit comprises a horizontal base comprising four microplate holders. The horizontal base is made of rectangle of aluminum comprising the following approximate dimensions of ⅜ inch in height, fourteen inches in width and twenty seven inches in length. The automated cleansing unit further comprises two vertical supports comprised of aluminum with the approximate dimensions of one inch by two inches by ten and ¾ of an inch in height. The vertical supports are attached to a horizontal support comprising a rodless air slide. The horizontal support comprising a rodless air slide comprises the approximately dimension of a ½ inch by two inches by twenty six and ½ inches in height. Suitable rodless air slides comprise a one inch bore and eleven inch stroke and have associated end lugs and mount brackets, which are commercially available from McMaster-Carr. The rodless air slide can be double acting and comprises a carriage that is connected to an internal piston and two compressed air ports.


The automated cleansing unit comprises two magnetic arms. The horizontal support comprising a rodless air slide is the structure upon which the two magnetic arms are mounted.


The magnetic arms are mounted to the rodless air slide such that the magnetic arms move back and forth along the length of the double acting rodless air slide by the force of compressed air. Each of the magnetic arms are comprised of aluminum and have the approximate dimensions of one inch by two inches by fourteen inches in length and have a “T” shape channel that houses seven neodymium iron boron magnets (not shown). Each of the neodymium iron boron magnets has the approximate dimensions of two inches in length, one inch in width and half or an inch in height. Each of the neodymium iron boron magnets comprises a magnetic strength of 12200 Gauss, available from Edmund Scientifics. The magnetic arms are configured at a height of about 2.75 cm above the microplate holder with the caveat that the magnets maintain their function to attract and move the bodies comprised within the wells of the microplate. The magnetic arms move back and forth along the length of the rodless air slide by the force of compressed air at a speed of approximately 6 back and forth sweeps over the length of the rodless air slide over a 10 second time period.


The magnetic arms can be configured with four microplate holders. Each of the microplate holders comprise a clamping plate and four pistons attached to a pneumatic control unit. When actuated, the pistons for the pneumatic control unit hold the plates in the four plate holders at a pressure of about 90 psi. Prior to placing the lidded plates into the plate holders of automated cleansing unit, the pneumatic control unit is turned on.


The automated cleansing unit can comprise a pneumatic control unit. The top view shows components of the pneumatic control unit which can be connected to the rodless air slide, the piston and clamping plates. The pneumatic control unit can be used to apply compressed air to the automated cleansing unit, which imparts a force by converting the potential energy of compressed air into kinetic energy. The pneumatic control unit comprises a solenoid air control valve, a distribution manifold outlet, a compressed air control valve, a compressed air flow regulator, an alternating output binary valve, a two-hand safety pneumatic control valve, a compressed air control valve and various connectors that provide pressurized air to the automated cleansing unit from an external air source. The air control valve, air flow regulators, alternating a binary valves, a two-hand safety pneumatic control valve are positioned upstream of a solenoid air control valve. A suitable solenoid air control valve can be described as a double air style valve with a 10 psi to 120 operating pressure. Suitable compressed air flow regulators can operate, for example, in the pressure range of 14 psi to 116 psi. Suitable air control valve alternating output binary valves 40 can operate, for example, in a 35 psi to 100 psi range. All of the components of the pneumatic control unit are available from McMaster-Carr®.


The lidded plates are placed into the plate holders and pneumatic control unit is actuated such that the lidded plates are held under 90 psi of pressure. The magnetic arms are actuated on and arms moves over the lidded microplates at a height of 2.65 cm above the plate holders. The magnetic arms of the automated cleansing unit, sweep back and forth over the plate holders for 5 minutes, at a speed of 6 sweeps per every 10 seconds. After 5 minutes of the automated cleansing process, the lidded plates are removed from the plate holders and are disassembled.


After the automated washing process, two large 4000 ml beakers of 20° C. to 25° C. water are filled. The first piece of skin mimic is removed from the first plate and submerged in the tap water within the first beaker five times. The second piece of skin mimic is removed from the second microplate and submerged within the second beaker five times. The completeness of rinsing step is judged visually by the lack of foam on the skin mimic and presence of defined circles of deposited material on the skin mimic. Both piece of skin mimic are blotted gently with paper towels and fumed in a drying hood for at least 3 hours each.


The cut-out pieces of treated skin mimic are then extracted with a solvent and the extract is analyzed and quantified by gas chromatography.


V. EXAMPLES















Base




formula








I: Personal Care Composition




1) Aqueous Cleansing Phase




Sodium Trideceth Ether Sulfate
 8.63%



Cocamidopropyl Betaine
 2.58%



Trideceth-3
 1.37%



Sodium Chloride
 4.45%



Guar Hydroxypropyltrimonium Chlroide
 0.45%



(N-Hance CG-17 from Aqualon)




Xanthan Gum
 0.03%



(Keltrol 1000 from CP Kelco)




Acrylates/C10-30 Alkylacrylate Cross
 0.03%



Polymer




(Aqupec SER-300C from Sumitomo)




Methyl chloro isothiazolinone and methyl
 0.04%



isothiazolinone (Kathon CG, Rohm & Haas)




EDTA (Dissolvine NA 2×)
 0.14%



Sodium Benzoate
 0.28%



Perfume
 1.25%



Citric Acid, titrate
pH =




5.7 ± 0.2



Water and minors
Q.S.



2) Lipid Phase A




RBD Soybean Oil
 2.43%



Glyceryl Oleate
0.025%



BHT
 0.05%



3) Lipid Phase B




Petrolatum
 2.50%









The aqueous surfactant phase can be prepared through conventional mixing technique. The order of addition is as follow in the mixing vessel: water, sodium chloride, sodium trideceth sulfate, cocamidopropyl betaine, trideceth-3, guar hydroxypropyl trimonium chloride, Xanthan gum, Acrylates/C10-C30 Alkylacrylates cross polymer, EDTA, sodium benzoate. Adjust pH to 5.7 with citric acid. Then add Kathon and perfume. Keep mixing until homogenous. A benefit phase comprising a high viscosity benefit agent is placed into a separate tank and heated to between 50° C. to 80° C. (or above its melting point, whichever is greater). An additional benefit phase comprising a low viscosity benefit agent is placed into a second tank and heated to 20° C.-60° C. (or above its melting point, whichever is greater). Once the components of the cleansing phase are mixed, one of the benefit phases is added to the cleansing phase by injecting the benefit phase into a mixing device such as a static mixer, rotor-stator device, recirculation loop, or into a mixing zone in a mix tank, with the cleansing phase. The remaining benefit phase is then added to the composition in a fashion similar to that of the first benefit phase.


A sample process diagram for a manufacturing method is shown in FIG. 1.


The order of addition of the phases and the mixing is changed as noted below for each example.


Changes to this manufacturing method for each example are listed below.






















Example
Example
Example
Example
Example
Example
Example
Comparative



1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Example A
























II: Personal
Aqueous
Aqueous
Aqueous
Aqueous
Aqueous
Aqueous
Aqueous
Aqueous


Care Process
Cleaning
Cleaning
Cleaning
Cleaning
Cleaning
Cleaning
Cleaning
Cleaning


Configuration
Phase
Phase
Phase
Phase
Phase
Phase
Phase
Phase



Infusion
Infusion
Infusion
Infusion
Infusion
Infusion
Infusion
Infusion



Lipid B
Lipid A
Lipid A
Lipid B
Lipid B
Lipid A
Lipid B
Lipid A -



Infusion
Infusion
Infusion
Infusion
Infusion
Infusion
Infusion
Lipid B










Comined










Preblend










Infusion



Lipid A
Lipid B
2-6 mm
2-6 mm
2-6 mm
2-6 mm
1-6 mm
2-6 mm



Infusion
Infusion
static
static
static
static
static
static





mixers
mixers
mixers
mixers
mixer
mixers



2-6 mm
2-6 mm
Lipid B
Lipid A
Lipid A
Lipid B
Lipid A
1-10 mm



static
static
Infusion
Infusion
Infusion
Infusion
Infusion
static



mixers
mixers





mixer



1-10 mm
1-10 mm
2-6 mm
2-6 mm
1-6 mm
1-6 mm
2-6 mm
Salt Water



static
static
static
static
static
static
static
Dilution



mixer
mixer
mixers
mixers
mixer
mixer
mixers
Phase










Infusion



Salt Water
Salt Water
1-10 mm
1-10 mm
1-10 mm
1-10 mm
1-10 mm
2-10 mm



Dilution
Dilution
static
static
static
static
static
static



Phase
Phase
mixer
mixer
mixer
mixer
mixer
mixers



Infusion
Infusion



2-10 mm
2-10 mm
Salt Water
Salt Water
Salt Water
Salt Water
Salt Water



static
static
Dilution
Dilution
Dilution
Dilution
Dilution



mixers
mixers
Phase
Phase
Phase
Phase
Phase





Infusion
Infusion
Infusion
Infusion
Infusion





2-10 mm
2-10 mm
2-10 mm
2-10 mm
2-10 mm





static
static
static
static
static





mixers
mixers
mixers
mixers
mixers


Petrolatum
272 μg/cm2
272 μg/cm2
295 μg/cm2
301 μg/cm2
315 μg/cm2
349 μg/cm2
330 μg/cm2
70 μg/cm2


Deposition









In the above table, the static mixers used were either six or ten mm in diameter, as indicated. Each static mixer unit consisted of six elements. The static mixers used were either one or two units of mixers for a total of six or twelve mixing elements. The static mixers used were SMX style static mixers from Sulzer.


It should be understood that every maximum numerical limitation given throughout this specification includes every lower numerical limitation, as if such lower numerical limitations were expressly written herein. Every minimum numerical limitation given throughout this specification will include every higher numerical limitation, as if such higher numerical limitations were expressly written herein. Every numerical range given throughout this specification will include every narrower numerical range that falls within such broader numerical range, as if such narrower numerical ranges were all expressly written herein.


The dimensions and values disclosed herein are not to be understood as being strictly limited to the exact numerical values recited. Instead, unless otherwise specified, each such dimension is intended to mean both the recited value and a functionally equivalent range surrounding that value. For example, a dimension disclosed as “40 mm” is intended to mean “about 40 mm.”


Every document cited herein, including any cross referenced or related patent or application and any related patent or application identified in the Application Data Sheet accompanying this application, is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety unless expressly excluded or otherwise limited. The citation of any document is not an admission that it is prior art with respect to any invention disclosed or claimed herein or that it alone, or in any combination with any other reference or references, teaches, suggests or discloses any such invention. Further, to the extent that any meaning or definition of a term in this document conflicts with any meaning or definition of the same term in a document incorporated by reference, the meaning or definition assigned to that term in this document shall govern.


While particular embodiments of the present invention have been illustrated and described, it would be obvious to those skilled in the art that various other changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. It is therefore intended to cover in the appended claims all such changes and modifications that are within the scope of this invention.

Claims
  • 1. A personal care composition comprising: a) a cleansing phase comprising: i) from about 5.0% to about 15%, by weight of the composition, of sodium trideceth 2 sulfate;ii) from about 1.0% to about 4%, by weight of the composition, of cocoamidopropyl betaine;iii) from about 0.1 to about 1%, by weight of the composition, of cationic guar with a charge density of about 0.2 meq/g to about 2.0 meq/g;iv) a structuring system comprising an associative polymer and a non-associative polymer; andb) a first benefit phase comprising petrolatum, wherein the average particle size of the first benefit phase is from about 50 μm to about 500 μm and the petrolatum is not encapsulated; andc) a second benefit phase comprising soy bean oil, wherein the average particle size of the second benefit phase is from about 0.5 μm to about 10 μm.
  • 2. The personal care composition of claim 1, wherein the first hydrophobic benefit phase is visually distinct from the second hydrophobic benefit phase.
  • 3. The personal care composition of claim 1, wherein the associative polymer comprises a polyacrylate, a hydrophobically-modified polysaccharide, a hydrophobically-modified urethane, or a mixture thereof.
  • 4. The personal care composition of claim 1, wherein the associative polymer comprises an alkyl acrylate polymer.
  • 5. The personal care composition of claim 1, wherein the associative polymer comprises an acrylate/C 10-C30 alkyl acrylate cross-polymer.
  • 6. The personal care composition of claim 1, wherein the structuring system further comprises an electrolyte.
  • 7. The personal care composition of claim 6, wherein the electrolyte is selected from the group consisting of sodium chloride, ammonium chloride, sodium sulfate, ammonium sulfate, and mixtures thereof.
  • 8. The personal care composition of claim 1, wherein the non-associative polymer is selected from the group consisting of polysaccharides, synthetic hydrocarbon polymers, and combinations thereof.
  • 9. The personal care composition of claim 8, wherein the polysaccharide comprises xanthan gum.
  • 10. The personal care composition of claim 1, wherein the benefit phase is free of surfactant.
US Referenced Citations (471)
Number Name Date Kind
2020454 Spaulding Nov 1935 A
2438091 Lynch Mar 1948 A
2528378 Mannheimer Oct 1950 A
2658072 Kosmin Nov 1953 A
2798053 Brown Jul 1957 A
2986271 Forrer May 1961 A
3455440 West Jul 1969 A
3479429 Morshauser Nov 1969 A
3533955 Pader Oct 1970 A
3542256 Waterman Nov 1970 A
D220248 Blumenthal Mar 1971 S
3618757 Funkhouser Nov 1971 A
3800898 Griffin Apr 1974 A
3850365 Dietrich Nov 1974 A
3852475 Tarangul Dec 1974 A
3899076 Florian Aug 1975 A
3915921 Schlatzer, Jr. Oct 1975 A
3926861 Gerecht Dec 1975 A
3929678 Laughlin et al. Dec 1975 A
3937811 Papantoniou Feb 1976 A
3940351 Schlatzer, Jr. Feb 1976 A
3951679 Bernhard Apr 1976 A
3980767 Chown Sep 1976 A
4062817 Westerman Dec 1977 A
4159028 Barker Jun 1979 A
4263363 Buck Apr 1981 A
4335103 Barker Jun 1982 A
4379753 Bolich, Jr. Apr 1983 A
4384096 Sonnabend May 1983 A
4421902 Chang et al. Dec 1983 A
4425322 Harvey Jan 1984 A
4429097 Chang et al. Jan 1984 A
4514552 Shay et al. Apr 1985 A
4518578 Hayes May 1985 A
4600761 Ruffner et al. Jul 1986 A
4616074 Ruffner Oct 1986 A
D292879 Smith Nov 1987 S
4743698 Ruffner et al. May 1988 A
4772427 Dawson Sep 1988 A
4814160 Carter Mar 1989 A
RE33008 Ruffner et al. Aug 1989 E
4879114 Catsimpoolas Nov 1989 A
RE33156 Shay et al. Jan 1990 E
4966205 Tanaka Oct 1990 A
4980155 Shah Dec 1990 A
5002680 Schmidt Mar 1991 A
5011681 Ciotti et al. Apr 1991 A
5059414 Dallal Oct 1991 A
5104646 Bolich, Jr. et al. Apr 1992 A
5106609 Bolich, Jr. et al. Apr 1992 A
5135748 Ziegler Aug 1992 A
5147576 Montague et al. Sep 1992 A
5223315 Katsura Jun 1993 A
5228912 Herget Jul 1993 A
5292843 Jenkins et al. Mar 1994 A
5294692 Barron et al. Mar 1994 A
5304334 Lahanas Apr 1994 A
5342883 Jenkins et al. Aug 1994 A
5364617 Bush Nov 1994 A
5393450 Shana Feb 1995 A
5412142 Wilkerson, III et al. May 1995 A
5455035 Guerrero Oct 1995 A
5462963 Bush Oct 1995 A
5487168 Geiner Jan 1996 A
5487884 Bissett et al. Jan 1996 A
5523619 Mcallister Jun 1996 A
5540853 Trinh Jul 1996 A
5556628 Derian Sep 1996 A
5578299 Starch Nov 1996 A
5612307 Chambers Mar 1997 A
5632420 Lohrman May 1997 A
5635171 Nadaud Jun 1997 A
5652228 Bissett Jul 1997 A
5661189 Grieveson Aug 1997 A
5681852 Bissett Oct 1997 A
5687779 Andersson Nov 1997 A
5716920 Glenn, Jr Feb 1998 A
5770760 Robinson Jun 1998 A
5816451 Renault Oct 1998 A
5851978 Shana Dec 1998 A
5873494 Dallas, Jr. Feb 1999 A
5874495 Robinson Feb 1999 A
5914117 Lavaud Jun 1999 A
5916575 McAtee et al. Jun 1999 A
5925603 D, Angelo Jul 1999 A
5929019 Puvvada Jul 1999 A
5947335 Milio Sep 1999 A
5952286 Puvvada Sep 1999 A
5954213 Gerhart Sep 1999 A
5965500 Puvvada Oct 1999 A
5965501 Rattinger Oct 1999 A
5965502 Balzer Oct 1999 A
5972361 Fowler Oct 1999 A
6051386 Lerner Apr 2000 A
6068834 Kvalnes May 2000 A
D426158 Underwood Jun 2000 S
6150312 Puvvada et al. Nov 2000 A
6150313 Harmalker et al. Nov 2000 A
6165395 Kieras Dec 2000 A
6174845 Rattinger Jan 2001 B1
6176391 Rehkemper Jan 2001 B1
6190648 Kouzu Feb 2001 B1
6194364 Glenn, Jr. Feb 2001 B1
D438460 Hammond Mar 2001 S
D439165 Erckelbout Mar 2001 S
6213166 Thibiant Apr 2001 B1
6217888 Oblong Apr 2001 B1
D441645 Longhurst May 2001 S
6232496 Carr May 2001 B1
6245323 Christie Jun 2001 B1
6245344 Thibiant Jun 2001 B1
6268322 St. Lewis Jul 2001 B1
D446121 Maddy Aug 2001 S
6270446 Abelbeck et al. Aug 2001 B1
D448678 Bakic Oct 2001 S
6306806 St. Lewis Oct 2001 B1
6335312 Coffindaffer et al. Jan 2002 B1
6338855 Albacarys Jan 2002 B1
6340723 Nitta Jan 2002 B1
D455655 Bunce Apr 2002 S
6367519 Thibiant Apr 2002 B2
6383999 Coyle May 2002 B1
6385992 Flore, Jr. May 2002 B1
6394323 Mcclean May 2002 B2
6395691 Tsaur May 2002 B1
6407044 Dixon Jun 2002 B2
6413192 Abelbeck Jul 2002 B2
6419783 Rainey Jul 2002 B1
6426326 Mitra Jul 2002 B1
6429177 Williams Aug 2002 B1
6433061 Marchant et al. Aug 2002 B1
D467807 Bakic Dec 2002 S
6495498 Niemiec Dec 2002 B2
6506391 Biatry Jan 2003 B1
6516838 Thibiant Feb 2003 B2
6517939 Moini Feb 2003 B1
6521216 Glandorf Feb 2003 B1
6523457 Ancona Feb 2003 B1
6534456 Hayward Mar 2003 B2
6534457 Mitra Mar 2003 B2
6534458 Kakizawa Mar 2003 B1
6537527 Kvalnes Mar 2003 B1
6547063 Zaveri Apr 2003 B1
6555509 Abbas et al. Apr 2003 B2
6564978 Safian May 2003 B1
6574985 Fiore, Jr. Jun 2003 B2
6589509 Keller Jul 2003 B2
6635702 Schmucker-Castner et al. Oct 2003 B1
6645511 Aronson et al. Nov 2003 B2
6652134 Lloyd Nov 2003 B2
6660251 Buenger et al. Dec 2003 B1
6663855 Frechet Dec 2003 B2
6673371 Brown Jan 2004 B2
6673755 Wei Jan 2004 B2
D486398 Lovell Feb 2004 S
6691394 Mcclean Feb 2004 B1
6695510 Look Feb 2004 B1
6716440 Aronson et al. Apr 2004 B2
6723688 Malik Apr 2004 B1
6727209 Pereira Apr 2004 B2
6759376 Zhang et al. Jul 2004 B2
6780826 Zhang et al. Aug 2004 B2
6849584 Geary Feb 2005 B2
D502400 Cinquino Mar 2005 S
D505079 Mulder May 2005 S
6897253 Schmucker-Castner et al. May 2005 B2
6919303 Pham Jul 2005 B2
6924256 Massaro Aug 2005 B2
D525872 Haubert Aug 2006 S
D525873 Haubert Aug 2006 S
7084104 Martin et al. Aug 2006 B2
7098180 Ganopolsky et al. Aug 2006 B2
D527637 Bakic Sep 2006 S
D528005 Bakic Sep 2006 S
D529388 Bakic Oct 2006 S
D529810 Davies Oct 2006 S
7119059 Librizzi et al. Oct 2006 B2
D533784 Bakic Dec 2006 S
7143893 Kelly Dec 2006 B2
7144542 Holzer Dec 2006 B2
7157414 Librizzi et al. Jan 2007 B2
7229486 Wiersema Jun 2007 B2
7229778 Hendrix et al. Jun 2007 B2
7268104 Krzysik Sep 2007 B2
7273837 Boutique Sep 2007 B2
7288616 Tamareselvy et al. Oct 2007 B2
7354926 Lintner Apr 2008 B2
7488707 Frantz et al. Feb 2009 B2
7511003 Focht et al. Mar 2009 B2
7524807 Clapp Apr 2009 B2
7527077 Mccall May 2009 B2
7531497 Midha et al. May 2009 B2
7537819 Hendricks May 2009 B2
D601425 Miller Oct 2009 S
D601648 Comello, Jr. Oct 2009 S
D608648 Rhodes Jan 2010 S
7649047 Tamareselvy et al. Jan 2010 B2
7666825 Wagner et al. Feb 2010 B2
7737104 Hilliard, Jr. et al. Jun 2010 B2
7749951 Hilliard, Jr. et al. Jul 2010 B2
7754666 Walters et al. Jul 2010 B2
7754667 Walters et al. Jul 2010 B2
7761242 Honkonen et al. Jul 2010 B2
7763419 Hendrix et al. Jul 2010 B2
7767389 Hendrix et al. Aug 2010 B2
7771924 Hendrix et al. Aug 2010 B2
7771925 Hendrix et al. Aug 2010 B2
7776346 Oconnor Aug 2010 B2
7803403 Librizzi et al. Sep 2010 B2
7820609 Soffin et al. Oct 2010 B2
7906475 Walters et al. Mar 2011 B2
7954392 Belcher et al. Jun 2011 B2
D641633 Carnduff Jul 2011 S
D644106 Almstead, Jr Aug 2011 S
8025902 Librizzi et al. Sep 2011 B2
D646170 Carnduff Oct 2011 S
8029772 Frantz Oct 2011 B2
8067517 Yoshinaka Nov 2011 B2
8093192 Liu Jan 2012 B2
8105996 Wei et al. Jan 2012 B2
8124064 Wei et al. Feb 2012 B2
8124573 Focht Feb 2012 B2
8147853 Taylor et al. Apr 2012 B2
8158566 Wei Apr 2012 B2
D660181 Nowacek May 2012 S
D660704 Simmons May 2012 S
D660705 Simmons May 2012 S
8283852 Lee Oct 2012 B2
8309667 Yoshinaka et al. Nov 2012 B2
D674282 Baldridge et al. Jan 2013 S
D674292 Klich Jan 2013 S
8394361 Frantz Mar 2013 B1
8417474 Datta et al. Apr 2013 B2
D683226 Baldridge May 2013 S
8518991 Gunn Aug 2013 B2
8772212 Restrepo et al. Jul 2014 B2
8785397 Bernard Jul 2014 B2
8795679 Einarsson Aug 2014 B2
8840871 Wei et al. Sep 2014 B2
9101551 Stella Aug 2015 B2
9162085 Dihora et al. Oct 2015 B2
9186642 Dihora Nov 2015 B2
9216143 Restrepo et al. Dec 2015 B2
9352289 Beijne et al. May 2016 B2
9671410 Stella Jun 2017 B2
9675530 Focht Jun 2017 B2
9717674 Guskey Aug 2017 B1
9750674 Wei et al. Sep 2017 B2
9808408 Stella Nov 2017 B2
9931282 Restrepo et al. Apr 2018 B2
9943468 Stevenson Apr 2018 B2
10085924 Wei Oct 2018 B2
10588858 Tamarkin Mar 2020 B2
10966916 Wei Apr 2021 B2
20010006088 Lyle Jul 2001 A1
20020042448 Sorrentino et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020122772 Lukenbach Sep 2002 A1
20020182112 Thorn Leeson et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030003069 Carson Jan 2003 A1
20030083210 Goldberg May 2003 A1
20030147842 Restle et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030161852 Miller Aug 2003 A1
20030171230 Shana'a et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030180246 Frantz Sep 2003 A1
20030207988 Tamareselvy et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030232101 Travis Dec 2003 A1
20040009138 Kling Jan 2004 A1
20040028932 Holzer Feb 2004 A1
20040057920 Focht Mar 2004 A1
20040091445 Dykstra May 2004 A1
20040092415 Focht May 2004 A1
20040092425 Boutique May 2004 A1
20040105827 Grimm Jun 2004 A1
20040146475 Peffly Jul 2004 A1
20040158940 Wells Aug 2004 A1
20040180020 Manelski Sep 2004 A1
20040219119 Wei Nov 2004 A1
20040223929 Clapp Nov 2004 A1
20040223939 Clausen Nov 2004 A1
20040223991 Wei et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040223992 Clapp Nov 2004 A1
20040232023 Bansal Nov 2004 A1
20040235693 Wei Nov 2004 A1
20040235702 Hawkins Nov 2004 A1
20040248748 Wei Dec 2004 A1
20040248749 Mitra Dec 2004 A1
20050003975 Browne Jan 2005 A1
20050019299 LiBrizzi et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050020468 Frantz et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050049172 Lukenbach et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050063930 Carlsson Mar 2005 A1
20050070452 Librizzi et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050075256 Librizzi et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050100570 Wei et al. May 2005 A1
20050129759 Sojka Jun 2005 A1
20050139574 Simone Jun 2005 A1
20050143269 Wei Jun 2005 A1
20050191709 Hendrix Sep 2005 A1
20050192187 Wagner Sep 2005 A1
20050192188 Wagner Sep 2005 A1
20050192189 Wagner Sep 2005 A1
20050221334 Benson Oct 2005 A1
20050238680 Stella Oct 2005 A1
20050249758 Di Nov 2005 A1
20050269372 Smith Dec 2005 A1
20050276768 Wei Dec 2005 A1
20050287088 Guiramand Dec 2005 A1
20060002880 Peffly Jan 2006 A1
20060008438 Velarde Jan 2006 A1
20060040834 Hilliard Feb 2006 A1
20060042184 Perkins Mar 2006 A1
20060079417 Wagner Apr 2006 A1
20060079419 Wagner et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060079420 Wagner et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060079421 Wagner et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060094628 Wei May 2006 A1
20060094635 Pereira May 2006 A1
20060182699 Taylor Aug 2006 A1
20060189495 LiBrizzi et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060193800 Reinhardt et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060210505 Clapp Sep 2006 A1
20060257348 Walters Nov 2006 A1
20060269501 Johnson Nov 2006 A1
20060276357 Smith et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060276768 Miller Dec 2006 A1
20070141001 Clapp Jun 2007 A1
20070155637 Smith et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070187274 Dalea Aug 2007 A1
20070196344 Osborne et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070202488 Hendrix Aug 2007 A1
20070202489 Hendrix Aug 2007 A1
20070202490 Hendrix Aug 2007 A1
20070202491 Hendrix Aug 2007 A1
20070224154 Brumbaugh Sep 2007 A1
20070224696 Honkonen et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070248562 Berry Oct 2007 A1
20070259796 Fevola et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070280976 Taylor Dec 2007 A1
20070286832 Clapp et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080039353 Focht et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080045428 Focht et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080045429 Focht et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080095733 Griffin et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080112913 Librizzi May 2008 A1
20080196787 Comstock Aug 2008 A1
20080233061 Gates et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080242573 Wei Oct 2008 A1
20090005449 Gunn Jan 2009 A1
20090005460 Gunn et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090028809 Cetti Jan 2009 A1
20090042765 Gizaw Feb 2009 A1
20090107062 Pedersen Apr 2009 A1
20090148392 SenGupta Jun 2009 A1
20090162443 Anthony Jun 2009 A1
20090209600 Miner Aug 2009 A1
20090220443 Braksmayer Sep 2009 A1
20090227751 Yoshinaka Sep 2009 A1
20090311348 Einarsson et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090324521 Cetti Dec 2009 A1
20100022454 Norskov-Lauritsen Jan 2010 A1
20100022455 Chilkoti Jan 2010 A1
20100022456 Christensen Jan 2010 A1
20100022458 Kopke Jan 2010 A1
20100028376 Einarsson et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100040074 Dropps Feb 2010 A1
20100040075 Kalhoff Feb 2010 A1
20100048706 Subramanyam Feb 2010 A1
20100105102 Hanes Apr 2010 A1
20100158830 Wei et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100184847 Shin Jul 2010 A1
20100190675 Cetti Jul 2010 A1
20100216707 Bernard et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100317677 Hassel Dec 2010 A1
20100322878 Stella et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110033842 Moon Feb 2011 A1
20110038830 Bernard et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110045037 Tamarkin Feb 2011 A1
20110045039 Sunkel Feb 2011 A1
20110064688 Jordan Mar 2011 A1
20110071123 Schwartz Mar 2011 A1
20110089196 Cetti Apr 2011 A1
20110091439 Bernard et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110117225 Wei et al. May 2011 A1
20110162668 Coffindaffer Jul 2011 A1
20110165607 Takeda Jul 2011 A1
20110245124 Tsaur et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110245125 Tsaur Oct 2011 A1
20110247954 Wei Oct 2011 A1
20110250141 Wei Oct 2011 A1
20110251872 Wei Oct 2011 A1
20110253157 Wei Oct 2011 A1
20110253158 Wei Oct 2011 A1
20110257020 Stella et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110257030 Stella et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110257071 Miralles Oct 2011 A1
20110262025 Jarrold Oct 2011 A1
20110262570 Finlay Oct 2011 A1
20110268802 Dihora et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110269657 Dihora et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110280822 Griffin et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110281256 Davis Nov 2011 A1
20110281366 Davis Nov 2011 A1
20110305653 Jordan Dec 2011 A1
20120009285 Wei Jan 2012 A1
20120010303 Mujkic Jan 2012 A1
20120035557 Coffindaffer Feb 2012 A1
20120087882 Fevola et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120093753 Fevola et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120128964 Hulse et al. May 2012 A1
20120184448 Stella et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120197016 Laughlin Aug 2012 A1
20120258074 Mills Oct 2012 A1
20120258126 Schoeller Oct 2012 A1
20120276175 Dihora et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120276177 Hilliard, Jr. Nov 2012 A1
20120276210 Dihora et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120282309 Dihora et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120283112 Binder Nov 2012 A1
20120316095 Wei et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130115610 Lanzalaco May 2013 A1
20130115648 Lanzalaco May 2013 A1
20130149273 Wei et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130183360 Lips et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130225468 Corominas et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130253057 Wei et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130280174 Lipic Oct 2013 A1
20130280192 Carter et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130280193 Carter Oct 2013 A1
20130280202 Stella Oct 2013 A1
20130280356 Stella et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130281551 Stella et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130344012 Cohen Dec 2013 A1
20140023606 Scheunemann Jan 2014 A1
20140057997 Chevalier Feb 2014 A1
20140072533 Lanzalaco Mar 2014 A1
20140131395 Chang May 2014 A1
20140197309 Davis Jul 2014 A1
20140219946 Hloucha Aug 2014 A1
20140273055 Kerr et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140357714 Braksmayer Dec 2014 A1
20150071977 Dihora Mar 2015 A1
20150096582 Stella Apr 2015 A1
20150098920 Stella Apr 2015 A1
20160122806 Amini May 2016 A1
20160128913 Wei et al. May 2016 A1
20160128917 Wei May 2016 A1
20160128927 Wei et al. May 2016 A1
20160128930 Stella May 2016 A1
20160129917 Gariepy May 2016 A1
20160310375 Torres Rivera Oct 2016 A1
20170000711 Jansen Jan 2017 A1
20170049673 Wei Feb 2017 A1
20170165155 Glenn, Jr Jun 2017 A1
20170165164 Zhao Jun 2017 A1
20170174413 Callens et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170228514 Apte Aug 2017 A1
20170333315 Wei et al. Nov 2017 A1
20180055894 Kim Mar 2018 A1
20180110704 Zhao Apr 2018 A1
20180185255 Wei Jul 2018 A1
20180353394 Skubsch Dec 2018 A1
20180360706 Dihora Dec 2018 A1
20190117537 Wei Apr 2019 A1
20190117546 Wei Apr 2019 A1
20190142714 Dihora May 2019 A1
20190178774 Wei Jun 2019 A1
20200040373 Wei Feb 2020 A1
20200146967 Wei May 2020 A1
20200172876 Wei et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200360251 Wei Nov 2020 A1
20210077372 Wei et al. Mar 2021 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (76)
Number Date Country
1145026 Mar 1997 CN
1153468 Jul 1997 CN
1181006 May 1998 CN
1248910 Mar 2000 CN
1280488 Jan 2001 CN
1298293 Jun 2001 CN
103813780 May 2014 CN
110804666 Feb 2020 CN
20122018 Dec 2003 DE
102008035172 Feb 2010 DE
0078138 May 1983 EP
0937495 Aug 1999 EP
1005849 Sep 2001 EP
1064918 Sep 2002 EP
1243321 Sep 2002 EP
0907345 May 2003 EP
1657159 Aug 2007 EP
1383542 Apr 2008 EP
2505180 Oct 2012 EP
2233036 Jan 1975 FR
2792728 Oct 2000 FR
2908784 May 2008 FR
2924613 Jun 2009 FR
2924614 Jun 2009 FR
2925314 Jun 2009 FR
2924947 Mar 2010 FR
2245585 Aug 1992 GB
2431345 May 2009 GB
S61155311 Jul 1986 JP
H0395110 Apr 1991 JP
H04149112 May 1992 JP
6262060 Sep 1994 JP
8220550 Aug 1996 JP
10216106 Aug 1998 JP
2000229817 Aug 2000 JP
2002128639 May 2002 JP
2002138010 May 2002 JP
2009084224 Apr 2009 JP
2009126791 Jun 2009 JP
2010235567 Oct 2010 JP
2011178667 Sep 2011 JP
1020110068049 Jun 2011 KR
1020120009774 Feb 2012 KR
20170102857 Sep 2017 KR
9212911 Aug 1992 WO
WO9401084 Jan 1994 WO
9410973 May 1994 WO
WO9534280 Dec 1995 WO
WO9602225 Feb 1996 WO
WO9629979 Oct 1996 WO
9717938 May 1997 WO
9821299 May 1998 WO
9827193 Jun 1998 WO
WO9938491 Aug 1999 WO
9946319 Sep 1999 WO
0030597 Jun 2000 WO
0066612 Nov 2000 WO
0067712 Nov 2000 WO
0075240 Dec 2000 WO
0101931 Jan 2001 WO
0155497 Aug 2001 WO
02100358 Dec 2002 WO
03105796 Dec 2003 WO
WO2006113117 Oct 2006 WO
WO2007129330 Nov 2007 WO
WO2007129331 Nov 2007 WO
2008074624 Jun 2008 WO
WO2008148672 Dec 2008 WO
WO2009001260 Dec 2008 WO
WO2009077995 Jun 2009 WO
WO2009081368 Jul 2009 WO
WO2009081374 Jul 2009 WO
WO2010079468 Jul 2010 WO
2011133538 Oct 2011 WO
WO2012138710 Oct 2012 WO
WO2015044315 Apr 2015 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (86)
Entry
US 6,309,667 B1, 11/2012, Yoshinaka (withdrawn)
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2015/059926, dated Jan. 8, 2016, 12 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2012/068227, dated Jun. 11, 2014, 12 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2015/059922, dated Jan. 8, 2016, 14 pages.
All final and non-final office actions for U.S. Appl. No. 13/707,108.
All final and non-final office actions for U.S. Appl. No. 13/865,554.
All final and non-final office actions for U.S. Appl. No. 13/865,588.
All final and non-final office actions for U.S. Appl. No. 14/937,425.
All final and non-final office actions for U.S. Appl. No. 15/859,925.
All final and non-final office actions for U.S. Appl. No. 16/055,604.
All final and non-final office actions for U.S. Appl. No. 16/165,086.
All final and non-final office actions for U.S. Appl. No. 16/165,146.
All final and non-final office actions for U.S. Appl. No. 16/211,531.
All final and non-final office actions for U.S. Appl. No. 16/740,573.
Clariant “Mild Surfactants Clariant Mild Surfactants for Personal Care Applications” Jul. 23, 2015.
Cocamidopropyl betaine Product Specification, Edition 1, Jun. 2005.
Conti et al., Seasonal influences on stratum corneum ceramide 1 fatty acids and the influence of topical essential fatty acids, International Journal of Cosmetic Science 18, 1-12 (1996).
FDA CFR 21 201.57 (Apr. 1, 2008 edition).
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2013/037164, dated Sep. 6, 2013, 9 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2018/012287, dated Apr. 13, 2018, 15 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2018/056228, dated Feb. 12, 2019, 14 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2018/056232, dated Mar. 6, 2019, 13 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2019/044778, dated Oct. 25, 2019, 13 pages.
Jing, G. et al., Parallel-META 3: Compreshensive taxonomical and functional analysis platform for efficient comparison of microbial communities, Scientific Reports, 7:40371, DOI: 10.1038/srep40371 (2017), 11 pages.
Michael Starch: “New Cosmetic Ingredients Based on Soybean Oil”, IP.com journal, IP.com Inc., West Henrietta NY, US, Jun. 15, 2007, pp. 6, 12,14.
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/037165 dated Sep. 12, 2013.
Rogers et al., Stratum corneum lipids: the effect of ageing and the seasons, Archives of Dermatological Research (1996), 288:765-770.
Seite et al., Barrier function and microbiotic dysbiosis in atopic dermatitis, Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, vol. 8, 2015, pp. 479-483.
Sun et al., A Microbiome-Based Index for Assessing Skin Health and Treatment Effects for Atopic Dermatitis in Children, mSystems, vol. 4, Issue 4, e00293-19, Jul./Aug. 2019.
Triethanolamine Product Specification, Chemical Book, 2008.
Xu et al., Skin benfits of moisturising body wash formulas for children with atopic dermatitis: A randomised controlled clinical study in China, Australasian Journal of Dermatology (2019).
U.S. Appl. No. 61/657,145, filed Jun. 8, 2012, Karl Shiqing Wei et al.
“Composition and Applications of Aloe Vera Leaf Gel”, Josias H. Hamman, Published Aug. 8, 2008, Molecules 2008, 13, 1599-1616.
All Office Actions, U.S. Appl. No. 14/937,089.
All Office Actions, U.S. Appl. No. 16/120,681.
All Office Actions, U.S. Appl. No. 16/697,946.
All Office Actions, U.S. Appl. No. 16/943,888.
All Office Actions, U.S. Appl. No. 17/108,560.
Becker et al., Detection of Differentially Regulated Genes in Keratinocytes by cDNA Array Hybridization: Hsp27 and Other Novel Players in Response to Artificial Ultraviolet Radiation, Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 116, No. 6, Jun. 2001, pp. 983-988.
C. Faller et al. “Predictive ability of reconstructed human epidermis equivalents for the assessment of skin irritation of cosmetics”, Toxicology In Vitro., vol. 16, No. 5, Feb. 22, 2002, pp. 557-572.
Cheng Cheng Zhou et al. Self-Aggregation,Antibacterial Activity, and Mildness ofCyclodextrin/Cationic Trimeric Surfactant Complexes 11, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 8, No. 45, Nov. 7, 2016 (Nov. 7, 2016), p. 30811-30823, XP055557529.
Chng et al. Whole metagenome profiling reveals skin microbiome-dependent susceptibility to atopic dermatitis flare. Nature Microbiology 2016, vol. 1, No. 16106, pp. 1-10.
D.J. Burgess, Practical Analysis of Complex Coacervate Systems, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 140, No. 1, Nov. 1990, pp. 227-238.
Erhirhie et al. Medicinal Values of Citrullus Lanatus (Watermelon): Pharmacological Review. International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences 2013, vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 1305-1312 (Year: 2013).
Ertel et al., Leg wash protocol to assess the skin moisturization potential of personal cleansing products, International Journal of Cosmetic Science, vol. 21, No. Dec. 6, 1999, pp. 383-397.
Flores et al. Microbiome of Affected and Unaffected Skin of Patients with Atopic Dermatitis Before and After Emollient Treatment. Journal of Drugs in Dermatology 2014, vol. 13, issue 11, pp. 611-618 (Year: 2014).
Geert De Lathauwer, CD Proceeding 6th World Surfactant Congress CESIO, Berlin Germany, Jun. 2004 (paper# 154) KYear: 2004), 9 Pages.
Grando et al., Adrenergic and Cholinergic Control in the Biology of Epidermis: Physiological and Clinical Significance, Journal of Investigative Dermatology vol. 126, pp. 1948-1965 (2006).
Grice and Segre. The skin microbiome. Nature Reviews Microbiology 2011, vol. 9, pp. 244-253 (Year: 2011).
Household Products Database, Brand Information, “Olay Daily Renewal Moisturizing Body Wash, Calming, ”[Online] URL: http://householdproducts.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/household/brands?tbl=brands&id=16003084, accessed Feb. 8, 2006 (2 pages).
J. Caelles et al., Anionic and Cationic Compounds in Mixed Systems, Cosmetics & Toiletries, vol. 106, Apr. 1991, pp. 49-54.
J. Crank, The Mathematics of Diffusion, 2nd Edition, 1975, p. 63.
Joachim W. Fluhrl et al. “Comparative study of five instruments measuring stratum comeum hydration (Comeometer CM 820 and CM 825, Skicon 200, Nova DPM 9003, DermaLab). Part 11. In vivo”, Skin Research and Technology, Jan. 1, 1999, pp. 171-178,.
Jun. 2009 (Jun. 2009). “Tahitian Escape Exfoliating Body Wash”, XPOQ2752393, Database accession No. 1124626, 3 Pages.
Kikuchi et al., Improvement of Mild Inflammatory Changes of the Facial Skin Induced by Winter Environment with Daily Applications of a Moisturizing Cream. AHalf-Side Test of Biophysical Skin Parameters, Cytokine Expression Pattern and the Formation of Cornified Envelope, Dermatology, vol. 207, No. 3, 2003, pp. 269-275.
KOBO Brochure, Treated Pigments, May 2000, 20 Pages.
Kong et al. Performing Skin Microbiome Research: A Method to the Madness. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 2016, vol. 137, pp. 561-568 (Year: 2016).
Kong, et al., “Temporal shifts in the skin microbiome associated with disease flares and treatment in children with atopic dermatitis”, Genome Research, 2012, vol. 22, pp. 850-859, Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
Marzatico et al., Evaluation of anti-wrinkle, elasticizing, ridensifying and skin barrier “repairing” efficacy of a cosmetic treatment, Farcoderm Tested Wellness, BIOTIVIA, Jun. 18, 2009, 42 pages.
Meisel et al. Skin Microbiome Surveys are strongly influenced by experimental design. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 2016, vol. 136, pp. 947-946 (Year: 2016).
Michael Starch et al., “New Cosmetic Ingredients Based onMetathesized Soybean Oil”, IP.com Journal, IP.com Inc., West Henrietta, NY, US, Sep. 9, 2010 (Sep. 9, 2010), XP013140234. 11 Pages.
Milton, Section 9.2: Testing Hypotheses on a Proportion, Introduction to Probability and Statistics, Fourth Edition, Sep. 30, 2002, pp. 129-131.
Mintel Database “Extra Mild Moisturising Bar”, XP002752390, Database accession No. 2527423, Sep. 2014 (Sep. 2014, 5 Pages.
Mintel Database “Healthy Shower Gel”, Mar. 2011 (Mar. 2011), XP002752392. Database accession No. 1513292, 3 Pages.
Mintel Database, “Shampoo”, XPG02752391, Database accession No. 2242340, Nov. 2013 (Nov. 2013), 2 Pages.
Niemeyer et al. A systematic literature review of the human skin microbiome as biomarker for dermatological drug development. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2018, vol. 84, pp. 2178-2193 (Year: 2018).
Product Data Sheet, N000557—Jun. 2009 (Year: 2009), 1 Page.
Raja K Sivamani et al.: “An Epinephrine-Dependent Mechanism for theControl of UV-Induced Pigmentation”, Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 129, No. 3, Aug. 21, 2008 (2008-08-21), pp. 784-787.
Rimpro India, Surfactant, 2011, 2 Pages.
Russel M. Walters et al., CleansingFormulations That Respect Skin Barrierintegrity',Adermatology Research And Practice, vol. 2012, Jan. 1, 2012 (Jan. 1, 2012), pp. 1-9, XP055557527.
Sam Osseiran et al. “Characterizing stratum corneum structure, barrier function, and chemical content of human skin with coherent Raman scattering imaging” Biomedical Optics Express, vol. 9. No. 12, Nov. 26, 2018, 19 Pages.
Schallreuter et al., The induction of the a-1-adrenoreceptor signal transduction system on human melanocytes, Experimental Dermatology 1996; vol. 5, Issue 1, pp. 20-23.
Scott Truong: “Design of a Handheld Skin Moisture Measuring Device for Application towards Eczema” Apr. 3, 2009, https://macsphere.mcmaster.ca/bitstream/11375/14416/1/fulltext.pdf, pp. 8, 9, 17 and 18.
Silva et al. Insights into the skin microbiome dynamics of leprosy patients during multi-drug therapy and in healthy individuals fromBrazil. Scientific Reports Jun. 8, 2018, 8:8783, pp. 1-10 (Year: 2018).
Tate Owen, Roger Pynn, Jennifer S. Martinez, and Alison Butler; Micelle-to-Vesicle Transition of an Iron-Chelating Microbial Surfactant, Marinobactin E; Nov. 12, 2005; Langmuir, 21,26, 12109-12114 (Year: 2005).
Two et al. The Cutaneous Microbiome and Aspects of Skin Antimicrobial Defense System Resist Acute Treatment with Topical Skin Cleansers. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 2016, vol. 136, pp. 1950-1954 (Year: 2016).
Van Oss, C.J., Coacervation, Complex Coacervation and Flocculation, Journal of Dispersion Science, vol. 9, 1989, 14 pages.
Vaughan, C. D., Solubility, Effects in Product, Package, Penetration and Preservation, , Cosmetics and Toiletries, vol. 103, Oct. 1988, 23 Pages.
Voegeli et al., Efficient and simple quantification of stratum corneum proteins on tape strippings by infrared densitometry, Skin Research and Technology 2007; 13; 242-251.
Weber et al. Steroid-Free Over-the-Counter Eczema Skin Care Formulations Reduce Risk of Flare, Prolong Time to Flare, andu Reduce Eczema Symptoms in Pediatric Subjects With Atopic Dermatitis Journal of Drugs in Dermatology, 2015, vol. 14, Issue 5, pp. 478-485.
Www.single-cell.cn/skin search results retrieved Oct. 5, 2019), 1 Page.
Yogiraj et al. Garica papaya Linn: An overview. International Journal of Herbal Medicine 2014, vol. 2, No. 5, pp. 01-08 (Year: 2014).
Zeng et al. High-Altitude Living Shapes the Skin Microbiome in Humans and Pigs. Frontiers in Microbiology 2017, vol. 8, article1929, pp. 1-10 (Year: 2017).
“Dove All Day Moisturizing Body Wash” Online URL: http://www.ewg.org/reports/skindeep2/report.php? type=PRODUCT&id=8801874, XP002332778, 6 Pages.
Engelke. “Effects of xerosis and aging on epidermal proliferation and differentiation”, Br. J. Dermatology, 137: 219-225 (1997).
“The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI”. Arch. Dermatology, 124: 869-871 (1988).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20160128913 A1 May 2016 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62077679 Nov 2014 US