Personal cleansing freezer bar with selected fatty acid soaps and synthetic surfactant for reduced bathtub ring, improved mildness, and good lather

TECHNICAL FIELD
This invention relates to freezer personal cleansing bar soaps.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to personal cleansing bar soaps prepared from soap using a "freezer" bar process of the general type disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,835,058, White, issued Sep. 10, 1974, incorporated herein by reference. These bars are called "freezer bars," and White teaches a freezer bar soap process. The White freezer bars and the present day standard freezer bar, disclosed herein, have bad bathtub ring (BTR).
Soap bars when lathered and solubilized in hard water (hard water being defined as water containing calcium as CaCO.sub.3 or CaCl.sub.2) form calcium soap on the walls of the bathtub or shower enclosure. This film, referred to as bathtub ring (BTR), is difficult to clean and therefore preventing its formation is desirable. Personal cleansing products designed to not form insoluble calcium soap (BTR) or to disperse it and not allow it to deposit on the shower or bath enclosure are considered consumer preferred.
A freezer bar process is distinguished from a transparent framed bar process. Japanese Pat. J5 7030-798, Jul. 30, 1980, discloses transparent solid "framed" or "molded" soap in which fatty acids constituting the soap component are myristic, palmitic, and stearic acids. A transparent soap is described in which at least 90 wt. % of the fatty acids which constitute the soap component are myristic acid, palmitic acid, and stearic acid. The product is reported as a transparent, solid soap having good frothing and solidifying properties, good storage stability, and a low irritant effect on human skin. The process and transparent bar soap composition exemplified in Jap. J5 7030-798 do not appear to contain synthetic surfactant and are believed to be distinguished from nontransparent freezer bars.
U.S. Pat. No. 2,988,511, Mills and Korpi, issued Jun. 13, 1961, for a nonsmearing "milled" detergent bar with at least 75% by weight of which consists essentially of (1) from about 15% to about 55% of normally solid detergent salts of anionic organic sulfuric reaction products which do not hydrolyze unduly under conditions of alternate wetting and drying, said salts being selected from the group consisting of the sodium and potassium salts, and said anionic organic sulfuric reaction products containing at least 50% alkyl glyceryl ether sulfonates from about 10% to about 30% of which alkyl glyceryl ether sulfonates are alkyl diglyceryl ether sulfonates, the alkyl radicals containing from about 10 to about 20 carbon atoms; (2) from about 5% to about 50% of a water-soluble soap of fatty acids having from about 10 to about 18 carbon atoms; and (3) from about 20% to about 70% of a binder material selected from the group consisting of freshly precipitated calcium soaps of fatty acids having from about 10 to about 18 carbon atoms, freshly precipitated magnesium soap of fatty acids having from about 10 to about 18 carbon atoms, starch, normally solid waxy materials which will become plastic under conditions encountered in the milling of soap and mixtures thereof. This Mills/Korpi patent is incorporated herein by reference. Freezer soap bars are distinguished from milled soap bars.
OBJECT OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of the present invention to provide a mild, good lathering freezer bar soap with reduced bathtub ring.
Another object is to provide a freezer bar soap that has reduced bathtub ring and is also mild.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a good lathering freezer bar with reduced bathtub ring without impairing mildness.
Still another object is to provide such a freezer bar which is processable.
Other objects of the present invention will be apparent in the light of the following disclosure.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to an improved freezer bar soap comprising selected saturated C.sub.14 -C.sub.18 fatty acid soaps and lathering synthetic surfactant. The bars of this invention have reduced bathtub ring, as well as improved mildness while maintaining acceptable lathering/sudsing characteristics.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to an improved freezer bar soap with reduced bathtub ring which comprises: selected saturated C.sub.14 -C.sub.18 fatty acid soaps and lathering synthetic surfactant.
Such freezer bar soap is made using a process generally disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,835,058, White, supra.
The bars of this invention have improved bathtub ring and mildness while maintaining acceptable sudsing characteristics.
The present invention is broadly defined as:
A mild, lathering personal cleansing freezer soap bar with reduced bathtub ring comprising:
I. from about 25% to about 70% of soap by weight of said bar, said soap consisting essentially of: saturated fatty acid soaps selected from the group consisting of: myristic, palmitic, and stearic acid soaps and mixtures thereof; wherein said soap counter ion is selected from the group consisting of sodium and potassium soap (Na/K); said Na/K soap having a percentage ratio of from about 100/0 to about 75/25 (the symbol "100/0" means 100% sodium soap/0% K soap);
II. from about 5% to about 30% of a lathering synthetic surfactant by weight of said bar; and
III. from about 15% to about 30% of water by weight of said bar; and
wherein said soap and said lathering synthetic surfactant have a weight ratio of from about 5:1 to about 1:1, preferably from about 3:1 to about 1.5:1.
A preferred bar is defined as: a mild, lathering personal cleansing freezer soap bar with reduced bathtub ring comprising:
I. from about 25% or 30% to about 70% of total fatty acid soap by weight of said bar, said total soap comprising:
(a) saturated fatty acid soaps selected from the group consisting of: myristic, palmitic, and stearic acid soaps and mixtures thereof at a level of from about 75%.+-.3% to about 100% by weight of total fatty acid soap; and
(b) from 0% to about 25%.+-.3% (by weight of total soap) of "other" soaps selected from the group consisting of: oleic and lauric acid soaps and minor fatty acid soap selected from the group consisting essentially of: C.sub.8, C.sub.10, C.sub.18:2 soaps mixtures thereof;
wherein said soap counter ion is selected from the group consisting of sodium and potassium soap (Na/K); said Na/K soap having a percentage ratio of from about 100/0 to about 75/25 ("100/0" means 100% Na soap and 0% K soap); and
wherein said oleic soap level is from 0% to about 10% by weight of the bar; and
said lauric soap is from 0% to about 10% by weight of said bar; and
wherein said minor (C.sub.8, C.sub.10, C.sub.18:2) soap level is from 0% to about 5% by weight of said bar;
said preferred bar further comprising:
II. from about 5% to about 30% of mild lathering synthetic surfactant by weight of said bar;
III. optionally from about 5% to about 30% of a nonreducing sugar;
IV. from about 0.2% to about 35% of a hydrophobic/lipophilic soap bar additive material selected from materials disclosed hereinbelow; and
V from about 15% to about 30% of water by weight of said bar; and
wherein said total soap and said lathering synthetic surfactant have a ratio of from about 5:1 to about 1:1.
The total soap levels of the selected saturated fatty acid soap and the "other soaps" are, respectively, about 75% to about 100%, and 0% to about 25%. The ends of these levels (25% and 75%) are flexible (.+-.3%) as long as the level of each "other soap" is within the level "by weight of the bar" as defined herein. In other words, about 25% of the other soap by weight of the total soap can go as high as 26% to 28% by weight of total soap; but the level of lauric acid soap should not exceed about 10% by weight of the bar.
In view of the definitions herein, more preferred low BTR forming, mild, lathering personal cleansing freezer soap bars will be apparent.
Some preferred bars can have a substantial amount of a soap structure disclosed in commonly assigned, copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/617,827, filed Nov. 26, 1990, of Kacher, Taneri, Camden, Vest, and Bowles, for a "Shaped Solid Made with a Rigid, Interlocking Mesh of Neutralized Carboxylic Acid," said application being incorporated herein by reference. Such bars can have very little smear formed on standing in a wet soap dish. Such bars comprise a structure which is a continuous or semi-continuous, relatively rigid, interlocking, open, three-dimensional crystalline mesh of neutralized carboxylic acid, i.e., the selected fatty acid soaps defined herein, particularly sodium soap of saturated fatty acids.
I.e., these bars contain a substantial amount (e.g., at least about 5% to about 75% by volume) of the continuous or semi-continuous, rigid, interlocked mesh of neutralized fatty carboxylic acid, preferably sodium soap of saturated fatty acids. Bars containing substantial amounts of said mesh structure tend to be harder, with improved smear. Bars with said mesh structure are not typically translucent. Other advantages of this type of mesh structure and guidance for obtaining said mesh structure are found generally in said U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/617,827. When a freezer process is used rather than a frame process, additional soap may be required to achieve sufficient viscosity to form a soft plug on exiting the freezer and subsequently still form the same level of structure. Agitation, which tends to destroy the structure, is minimized at the time said mesh structure is forming. Higher levels of individual saturated chain length(s) tend to form the said mesh structure better.
Within the scope of the invention, there are several different preferred embodiments. The levels, parts, percentages, temperatures, ranges, and ratios herein are by weight unless otherwise specified. Note that the levels of the soaps expressed herein are in terms of weight percent (wt. %) of the total soap and also in terms of wt. % of the bar. All numerical limits, ranges, ratios, etc., are approximations unless otherwise specified.
Soap
The bars of this invention contain soap at levels of 25-70%, preferably 25-60%, more preferably 30-50% by weight of the bar.
The fatty acid soap component suitable for use in the compositions and processes of the present invention includes sodium soap and mixtures of sodium and potassium soaps of higher saturated fatty acids as defined herein. Mixtures of sodium and potassium soaps are preferred for lather. Other cations with similar properties can be used, at least in small amounts, like triethanolammonium (TEA), lithium, and magnesium cations. Such other cations, when used, are used at a level of from 0% to 10%, preferably from 0% to about 5%, by weight of the total soap.
TABLE 1______________________________________Solubility of Soaps, Molar, 25.degree. C.Na K Mg______________________________________C.sub.12 0.11 Freely InsolubleC.sub.18:1 0.49 Freely N/AC.sub.14 0.004 Freely InsolubleC.sub.16 Insoluble Not available InsolubleC.sub.18 Insoluble Not available Insoluble______________________________________
The term "insoluble" soap as used herein means soap less soluble than sodium myristate NaC.sub.14.
The term "relatively more soluble soap" as used herein means a soap of which the fatty chain length or level of unsaturation is such that it is more soluble than sodium myristate, or a soap that has the solubility on the order of sodium laurate or oleate soaps, excluding potassium soaps.
Traditionally, increasing relatively more soluble soap improves lather. It would be expected that soluble soaps would easily rinse and not form soap scum (BTR). It is surprising that minimizing relatively more soluble soaps and using higher levels of insoluble soap actually reduces BTR and improves mildness. Lather can be maintained in these bars, containing high levels of insoluble soap by balancing the level of K vs. Na soap, cis C.sub.18:1 vs. trans C.sub.18:1, sucrose level and synthetic surfactant level.
The term "coconut" as used herein in connection with soap or fatty acid mixtures refers to materials having an approximate carbon chain length distribution of: 8% C.sub.8 ; 7% C.sub.10 ; 48% C.sub.12 ; 17% C.sub.14 ; 9% C.sub.16 ; 2% C.sub.18 ; 7% C.sub.18:1 oleic; and 2% linoleic (the first six fatty acids being saturated).
The term "palm oil stearin" as used herein refers to materials having an approximate carbon chain length distribution of about: 1% C.sub.14, 58% C.sub.16, 5% C.sub.18, 29% oleic, and 7% linoleic (the first three fatty acids being saturated).
The term "tallow" as used herein refers to a mixture of soaps having an approximate chain length distribution of: 2.5% C.sub.14 ; 29% C.sub.16 ; 23% C.sub.18 ; 2% palmitoleic; 41.5% oleic and 3% linoleic.
The term "triple pressed stearic" as used herein refers to fatty acids having an approximate chain length distribution of 55% palmitic, C.sub.16, 45% stearic, C.sub.18.
The fatty acid soap can be made using pure chain fatty acids, or by using the proper levels and ratios of common fatty acid mixtures such as coconut, palm oil stearin, tallow, and triple pressed stearic.
The preferred levels and ratios can vary with the levels of cation mixtures.
The sodium soap is preferably at least about 75% of the total soap present in the bar. The percentage of Na/K soap is from 100/0 to 75/25. When used, the levels of TEA or magnesium soap should not exceed about one-tenth of the level of total soap, and is preferably less than about one-twentieth (5%) that of the total soap.
The terms "soap" and "fatty acid (FA) salts" as used herein are sometimes interchangeable. "Soap" is normally used since it is easier to relate to and have a generic connotation. The term "soap" as used herein can mean a single fatty acid soap or a mixture of fatty acid soaps.
As shown in Table 2, the fatty acid (FA) soap of the present invention consists essentially of C.sub.14 -C.sub.18 FA soap. Some "other" soaps can be present, but are not preferred for bathtub ring reduction.
TABLE 2______________________________________Total Fatty Acid Soap Full Preferred More Preferred______________________________________FA Chain C.sub.14-18 75-100% 85-100% 95-100%______________________________________
Tables 3 and 4 show levels of other FA soaps which can be used in compositions of the present invention. Some preferred compositions are essentially free of these other FA soaps. Examples of "minor, more water-soluble soaps" are C.sub.8, C.sub.10, C.sub.18:2 and the like which are present at a level of from 0% to about 5% by weight of the bar. Such minor soaps help lather but result in more bathtub ring.
TABLE 3______________________________________Percent "Other" Soap: C.sub.12 , Unsaturated and/or MinorChain Soaps in the Bar Broad Preferred More Preferred______________________________________C.sub.12 + C.sub.18:1 + Minors 0-17% 0-10% 0-5%______________________________________
TABLE 4______________________________________Maximum Wt. % of Each "Other" Soap in the BarMaximum Preferred More Preferred______________________________________C.sub.12 10% 0-5% 0-1%C.sub.18:1 10% 0-5% 0-1%Minors 5% 0-5% 0-1%______________________________________
Synthetic Detergent Surfactant
The bar of this invention contains by weight of the bar: from about 5% to about 30%, preferably from about 10% to about 30%, more preferably from about 10% to about 25%, synthetic detergent surfactant, preferably a mild lathering synthetic detergent surfactant.
Normally the soap/synthetic bars are prepared to contain a ratio of soap to synthetic detergent of from about 5:1 to about 1:1. A preferred ratio is from about 3:1 to about 1.5:1. The choice of suitable ratios will depend upon the particular synthetic detergent, soap chain distribution, the desired performance and physical characteristics of the finished bar, processing temperature, moisture level and other processing considerations.
A lathering synthetic surfactant is defined herein as a surfactant or a synthetic surfactant mixture which has a lather better than sodium palmitate, preferably better than sodium myristate.
The synthetic detergent surfactant is typically selected from the group consisting of: anionic, nonionic, amphoteric and zwitterionic synthetic detergents. Both low and high lathering and high and low water-soluble surfactants can be used in the bar compositions of the present invention. Suds boosting synthetic detergent surfactants and/or synthetic detergent surfactants that are good dispersants for soap curds that are formed in hard water, are particularly desirable.
Examples of suitable synthetic detergents for use herein are those described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,351,558, Zimmerer, issued Nov. 7, 1967, at column 6, line 70 to column 7, line 74, incorporated herein by reference.
Examples include the water-soluble salts of organic, sulfonic acids and of aliphatic sulfuric acid esters, that is, water-soluble salts of organic sulfuric reaction products having in the molecular structure an alkyl radical of from 10 to 22 carbon atoms and a radical selected from the group consisting of sulfonic acid and sulfuric acid ester radicals.
Synthetic sulfate detergents of special interest are the normally solid alkali metal salts of sulfuric acid esters of normal primary aliphatic alcohols having from 10 to 22 carbon atoms. Thus, the sodium and potassium salts of alkyl sulfuric acids obtained from the mixed higher alcohols derived by the reduction of tallow or by the reduction of coconut oil, palm oil, palm kernel oil, palm oil stearin, babassu kernel oil or other oils of the coconut group can be used herein.
Other aliphatic sulfuric acid esters which can be suitably employed include the water-soluble salts of sulfuric acid esters of polyhydric alcohols incompletely esterified with high molecular weight soap-forming carboxylic acids. Such synthetic detergents include the water-soluble alkali metal salts of sulfuric acid esters of higher molecular weight fatty acid monoglycerides such as the sodium and potassium salts of the coconut oil fatty acid monoester of 1,2-hydroxypropane-3-sulfuric acid ester, sodium and potassium monomyristoyl ethylene glycol sulfate, and sodium and potassium monolauroyl diglycerol sulfate.
The synthetic surfactants and other materials useful in conventional cleaning products are also useful in the present invention. In fact, some ingredients such as certain hygroscopic synthetic surfactants which are normally used in liquids and which are very difficult to incorporate into normal cleansing bars are very compatible in the bars of the present invention. Thus, essentially all of the known synthetic surfactants which are useful in cleansing products are useful in the compositions of the present invention. The cleansing product patent literature is full of synthetic surfactant disclosures. Some preferred surfactants, as well as other cleansing product ingredients, are disclosed in the following references:
______________________________________Pat. No. Issue Date Inventor(s)______________________________________4,061,602 12/1977 Oberstar et al.4,234,464 11/1980 Morshauser4,472,297 9/1984 Bolich et al.4,491,539 1/1985 Hoskins et al.4,540,507 9/1985 Grollier4,565,647 1/1986 Llenado4,673,525 6/1987 Small et al.4,704,224 11/1987 Saud4,788,006 11/1988 Bolich, Jr., et al.4,812,253 3/1989 Small et al.4,820,447 4/1989 Medcalf et al.4,906,459 3/1990 Cobb et al.4,923,635 5/1990 Simion et al.4,954,282 9/1990 Rys et al.______________________________________
All of said patents are incorporated herein by reference. Some preferred synthetic surfactants are shown in the Examples herein. Preferred synthetic surfactant systems are selectively designed for bar appearance, stability, lather, cleansing and mildness.
It is noted that surfactant mildness can be measured by a skin barrier destruction test which is used to assess the irritancy potential of surfactants. In this test the milder the surfactant, the less the skin barrier is destroyed. Skin barrier destruction is measured by the relative amount of radio-labeled water (.sup.3 H-H.sub.2 O) which passes from the test solution through the skin epidermis into the physiological buffer contained in the diffusate chamber. This test is described by T. J. Franz in the J. Invest. Dermatol., 1975, 64, pp. 190-195; and in U.S. Pat. No. 4,673,525, Small et al., issued Jun. 16, 1987, incorporated herein by reference. These references disclose a mild alkyl glyceryl ether sulfonate (AGS) surfactant based synbar comprising a "standard" alkyl glyceryl ether sulfonate mixture and define the criteria for a "mild surfactant." Barrier destruction testing is used to select mild surfactants. Some preferred mild synthetic surfactants are disclosed in the above Small et al. and Rys et al. patents. Some specific examples of preferred surfactants are used in the Examples herein.
Some examples of good mild, lather-enhancing, synthetic detergent surfactants are, e.g., sodium lauroyl sarcosinate, alkyl glyceryl ether sulfonate, sulfonated fatty esters, and sulfonated fatty acids.
Numerous examples of other surfactants are disclosed in the patents incorporated herein by reference. They include other alkyl sulfates, anionic acyl sarcosinates, methyl acyl taurates, N-acyl glutamates, acyl isethionates, alkyl sulfosuccinates, alkyl phosphate esters, ethoxylated alkyl phosphate esters, trideceth sulfates, protein condensates, mixtures of ethoxylated alkyl sulfates and alkyl amine oxides, betaines, sultaines, and mixtures thereof. Included in the surfactants are the alkyl ether sulfates with 1 to 12 ethoxy groups, especially ammonium and sodium lauryl ether sulfates.
Alkyl chains for these other surfactants are C.sub.8 -C.sub.22, preferably C.sub.10 -C.sub.18. Alkyl glycosides and methyl glucose esters are preferred mild nonionics which can be mixed with other mild anionic or amphoteric surfactants in the compositions of this invention. Alkyl polyglycoside detergents are useful lather enhancers. The alkyl group can vary from about 8 to about 22 and the glycoside units per molecule can vary from about 1.1 to about 5 to provide an appropriate balance between the hydrophilic and hydrophobic portions of the molecule. Combinations of C.sub.8 -C.sub.18, preferably C.sub.12 -C.sub.16, alkyl polyglycosides with average degrees of glycosidation ranging from about 1.1 to about 2.7, preferably from about 1.2 to about 2.5, are preferred.
Sulfonated esters of fatty esters are preferred wherein the chain length of the carboxylic acid is C.sub.8 -C.sub.22, preferably C.sub.12 -C.sub.18 ; the chain length of the ester alcohol is C.sub.1 -C.sub.6. These include sodium methyl alpha-sulfo laurate, sodium methyl alpha-sulfo cocoate, and sodium methyl alpha-sulfo tallowate.
Amine oxide detergents are good lather enhancers. Some preferred amine oxides are C.sub.8 -C.sub.18, preferably C.sub.10 -C.sub.16, alkyl dimethyl amine oxides and C.sub.8 -C.sub.18, preferably C.sub.12 -C.sub.16, fatty acyl amidopropyl dimethyl amine oxides and mixtures thereof.
Fatty acid alkanolamides are good lather enhancers. Some preferred alkanolamides are C.sub.8 -C.sub.18, preferably C.sub.12 -C.sub.16, monoethanolamides, diethanolamides, and monoisopropanolamides and mixtures thereof.
Other detergent surfactants are alkyl ethoxy carboxylates having the general formula
RO(CH.sub.2 CH.sub.2 O).sub.k CH.sub.2 COO.sup.- M.sup.+
wherein R is a C.sub.8-22 alkyl group, k is an integer ranging from 0 to 10, and M is a cation; and polyhydroxy fatty acid amides having the general formula ##STR1## wherein R.sup.1 is H, a C.sub.1-4 hydrocarbyl, 2-hydroxy ethyl, 2-hydroxy propyl, or mixtures thereof, R.sup.2 is a C.sub.5-31 hydrocarbyl, and Z is a polyhydroxyhydrocarbyl having a linear hydrocarbyl chain with at least 3 hydroxyl groups directly connected to the chain, or an alkoxylated derivative thereof.
Betaines are good lather enhancers. Betaines such as C.sub.8 -C.sub.18, preferably C.sub.12 -C.sub.16, alkyl betaines, e.g., coco betaines or C.sub.8 -C.sub.18, preferably C.sub.12 -C.sub.16, acyl amido betaines, e.g., cocoamidopropyl betaine, and mixtures thereof, are preferred.
Examples of specific surfactants follow.
Class: Nonionic
Sulfonates
Na C.sub.8 Glyceryl Ether Sulfonate
Na C.sub.12-14 Glyceryl Ether Sulfonate
Na C.sub.16 Glyceryl Ether Sulfonate
Sodium Cocomonoglyceride Sulfonate
Sodium Salt Of C.sub.8-16 Alkyl Glyceryl Ether Sulfonates
Alpha Sulfo Esters and Acids
Na Alpha Sulfo Methyl Laurate/Myristate
Na Alpha Sulfo Methyl Myristate
Na Alpha Sulfo Hexyl Laurate
Na Alpha Sulfo Methyl/Hexyl Laurate and Myristate
Na Alpha Sulfo Methyl Palmitate
Na Alpha Sulfo Methyl Stearate
Na 2-Sulfo Lauric Acid
Na 2-Sulfo Palmitic Acid
Na 2-Sulfo Stearic Acid
R.sub.1 -C(SO.sub.3 -Na.sup.+)-CO.sub.2 R.sub.2 R.sub.1 =C.sub.8-14 ; R.sub.2 =C.sub.1-8
Sodium Alkyl Isethionates
Sodium Lauryl Isethionate
Sodium Cocoyl Isethionate
Sarcosinates
Sodium Lauryl Sarcosinate
Sodium Stearyl Sarcosinate
Sodium Cocoyl Sarcosinate
Alkyl Sulfates
Sodium Lauryl Sulfate
Sodium Laureth-1 Sulfate
Sodium Oleyl Sulfate
Sodium Cetearyl Sulfate
Sodium Cetyl Sulfate
R.sub.1 (OCH.sub.2 CH.sub.2).sub.n OSO.sub.3 -X, R.sub.1 =C.sub.8-14, C.sub.16-20 with at least one double bond, X=0-18
Acyl Glutamates
Sodium Cocoyl Glutamate
Sodium Lauryl Glutamate
Sodium Myristyl Glutamate
Sodium Stearyl Glutamate
Alkyl Ether Carboxylates
Sodium Laureth-5 Carboxylate
Sodium Palmityl-20 Carboxylate
R.sub.1 -(O--CH.sub.2 CH.sub.2).sub.n CO.sub.2 --, R.sub.1 =C.sub.8-18, n=1-30
Sulfosuccinates
Disodium Laureth Sulfosuccinate
Phosphates
Sodium Monoalkyl (70% C.sub.12 /30% C.sub.14)
Phosphate
Class: Amphoterics
Betaines
Coco Betaine
Cocoamidopropyl Betaine
Palmitylamidopropyl Betaine
Isostearamidopropyl Betaine
Sultaines
Cocoamidopropylhydroxy Sultaine
Amine Oxides
Palmityl Dimethyl Amine Oxide
Myristyl Dimethyl Amine Oxide
Cocoamidopropyl Amine Oxide
Protein Derived
NA/TEA C.sub.12 Hydrolyzed Keratin
Water
The level of water in the bar can range from about 15% to about 30%, preferably from about 15% to about 25%, more preferably from about 20% to about 25%. Higher levels of water within these preferred ranges are preferred for mildness and cost reduction. Excess amounts of water can be used in a process for making the bars of this invention; but, when sucrose is used the excess water should be removed prior to the addition of any sucrose to avoid burning (degrading) the sucrose in the 300.degree. F. (149.degree. C.) drying step. In a preferred aerated freezer bar process, the amount of water used does not require a drying step.
It should be noted that in frame bar processes higher levels of water or solvent can be used because the bars are not required to stand up (hold their shape) upon extrusion as in a freezer bar process.
Nonreducing Sugar
When used, the optional, but preferred, nonreducing sugar is used at a level of from about 5% to about 30%, preferably from about 5% to about 20%, by weight of the bar. The sugar can be used to replace some of the soap. The net effect of less soap in this case is a corresponding mildness benefit. The use of sugar also has a freezer bar processing benefit and perhaps a lather benefit by increasing the bar's solubility.
Sucrose will not reduce Fehling's solution and therefore is classified as a "nonreducing" disaccharide. Sucrose, commonly known as table sugar, is by far the most abundant carbohydrate found in the sap of land plants. It is one of the few nonreducing sugars available in a state of unexcelled purity, in highly crystalline form, on a very large scale, and at low cost. It has been produced since 2000 B.C. from the juice of the sugar cane and since the early 1800's from the sugar beet. Sucrose is a sweet, crystalline (monoclinic) solid which melts at 160.degree.-186.degree. C., depending on the solvent of crystallization.
Unless otherwise specified, the term "sucrose" as used herein includes sucrose, its derivatives, and similar nonreducing sugars and similar polyols which are substantially stable at a soap processing temperature of up to about 210.degree. F. (99.degree. C.), e.g., trialose, raffinose, and stachyose; and sorbitol, lactitol and maltitol.
In contrast, starch, a complex sugar, is a reducing sugar and turns brown or "burns" at the typical soap processing pH and/or temperature. It is important for the preferred execution of the present invention to have a pumpable, stable soap mix which turns pure white upon aeration to provide a white soap bar that floats. Starch increases the viscosity of the soap mix.
The sucrose has an unexpectedly dramatic thinning effect on a freezer bar process soap mix. Its use can eliminate the need of excess water or solvent for homogeneous mixing. In other words, sucrose reduces the viscosity profile of the soap mix that goes into the freezer at comparable shear rates by about 20% up to about 99%. Preferably, the amount of sucrose used to replace a comparable amount of soap would decrease the viscosity of an otherwise comparably dried soap bar mix by at least 50%, and more preferably by at least 75%.
When the soap/sucrose mix is homogeneous, it is then cooled in a freezer to a temperature of from at least about 49.degree. C. to about 66.degree. C. Again, the soap/sucrose mix is still pumpable and has a viscosity which does not require extraordinary equipment or excess water or excess solvent. The use of excess water/solvent requires an additional step for drying. Preferably, no moisture reduction (drying) step is required. The soap/sucrose mixes are preferably formulated without excess water, but so that they are mixable and pumpable. The mixing temperature is typically from about 82.degree. C. to about 100.degree. C. The sucrose/soap composition crutcher mix, upon cooling, is used to make firm, stamped bars which stand up on a freezer process belt.
Alternatively, the sucrose can be added to a dried soap mix and still reduce its viscosity and provide a mildness benefit for the final bar. A "dried soap mix" is a mix wherein the water level has been reduced from about 30% to about 20-25%.
Hydrophobic/Lipophilic (Hydrophobic) Material
A preferred bar of the present invention can contain from 0% to about 35%, preferably from about 0.2% to about 25%, more preferably from about 5% to about 15% or 20%, of hydrophobic/lipophilic (hydrophobic) soap bar additive material. Preferably the hydrophobic/lipophilic material is selected from the group consisting of: (1) wax; (2) other hydrophobic material, including free fatty acids (FFA); mono-, di-, and triglycerides; and fatty alcohols containing from about 8 to about 18 carbon atoms in each acyl or alkyl group; and (3) mixtures thereof, and wherein the maximum of said wax is about 25%; and wherein the maximum of said other hydrophobic material is about 10% by weight of the bar. A small amount of free fatty acid, 0.2%, can be used.
The hydrophobic material optional component when used in this invention is selected from: waxes; mono-, di-, and triglycerides; fatty acids; fatty alcohols; other similar materials; and mixtures thereof. Preferably the bars contain at least 3% wax and the wax to other hydrophobic material have a ratio of from about 25:1 to about 1:3, more preferably from about 1:1 to about 10:1. The use of a hydrophobic component is highly preferred, but soap bars of the present invention can be made with little, or no, hydrophobic material as shown below in one of the Examples.
Depending on the specifics, the hydrophobic material can be present in preferred bars of this invention at a level of from about 0.2% up to about 30% or 35%, but is preferably used at a level of from about 5% or 10% to about 20% or 25%.
The levels of some hydrophobic materials, e.g., fatty acids, can be increased in the bar soap composition as the amount of sucrose is increased. The higher the amount of sucrose present, the more of such hydrophobic material can be present. Soap bars with or without sucrose can benefit from hydrophobic material, particularly the waxes. Triglycerides (C.sub.8 -C.sub.18 alkyl chain) can be used up to about 10% without adversely affecting lather performance. The preferred and exemplified bars of the present invention have good lathering properties equal to the industry standard aerated freezer bar soap IVORY.RTM..
The preferred hydrophobic material is a wax having a melting point (M.P.) of from about 120.degree. F. to about 185.degree. F. (49.degree.-85.degree. C.), preferably from about 125.degree. F. to about 175.degree. F. (52.degree.-79.degree. C.). Another preferred hydrophobic material is petrolatum.
Waxes include petroleum based waxes (paraffin, microcrystalline, and petrolatum), vegetable based waxes (carnauba, palm wax, candelilla, sugarcane wax, and vegetable derived triglycerides) animal waxes (beeswax, spemaceti, wool wax, shellac wax, and animal derived triglycerides), mineral waxes (montar, ozokerite, and ceresin) and synthetic waxes (Fischer-Tropsch).
A preferred paraffin wax is a fully refined petroleum wax having a melting point ranging from about 120.degree. F. to about 160.degree. F. (49.degree.-71.degree. C.). This wax is odorless and tasteless and meets FDA requirements for use as coatings for food and food packages. Such paraffins are readily available commercially. A very suitable paraffin can be obtained, for example, from The Standard Oil Company of Ohio under the trade name Factowax R-133.
Other suitable waxes are sold by the National Wax Co. under the trade names of 9182, 6971, and 6975, respectively having melting points of 131.degree. F., 130.degree. F. (.about.55.degree. C.), and 155.degree. F. (.about.68.degree. C.).
Depending on the paraffin selected, the paraffin preferably is present in the bar in an amount ranging from about 5% or 10% to about 15% or 20% by weight. The paraffin ingredient is used in the product to impart skin mildness, plasticity, firmness, and processability. It also provides a glossy look and smooth feel to the bar.
The paraffin ingredient is optionally supplemented by a microcrystalline wax. A suitable microcrystalline wax has a melting point ranging, for example, from about 140.degree. F. (60.degree. C.) to about 185.degree. F. (85.degree. C.), preferably from about 145.degree. F. (62.degree. C.) to about 175.degree. F. (79.degree. C.). The wax preferably should meet the FDA requirements for food grade microcrystalline waxes. A very suitable microcrystalline wax is obtained from Witco Chemical Company under the trade name Multiwax X-145A. The microcrystalline wax preferably is present in the bar in an amount ranging from about 0.5% to about 5% by weight. The microcrystalline wax ingredient imparts pliability to the bar at room temperatures.
Fatty acids are preferably used in the process of the invention. Preferred are those having from 8 to 18 carbon atoms. Normally a mixture of free fatty acids derived from natural sources is employed. Preferred mixtures of fatty acids are the saturated C.sub.14 -C.sub.18 fatty acid mixtures hereinbefore described.
The free fatty acids improve the quantity and quality of the lathering characteristics of bars prepared in accordance with the process of the present invention. The advantage of free fatty acids in tending to provide a lather of desirable stability and having small air bubbles so as to provide a rich or creamy lather has been known in the art. Fatty acids also provide an emollient effect which tends to soften the skin or otherwise improve feel-on-skin characteristics and scavenge any excess alkalinity.
The amount of free fatty acid incorporated into the preferred finished bars of the invention ranges from about 0.2% or 0.5% to about 8%. A preferred amount of fatty acid ranges from about 1% or 2% to about 6% or 7%.
The free fatty acid can be incorporated into bars of the present invention in a number of suitable ways. The free fatty acid component is desirably incorporated into the soap mixture either prior to, or simultaneously with, the high-shear mixing step used to form the bar composition. Uniform distribution of the free fatty acid throughout the finished bar composition is facilitated by the high-shearing action. The free fatty acid component can be added subsequent to the high-shear mixing step if other subsequent mixing means are employed so as to substantially uniformly distribute the free fatty acid throughout the soap mixture or resulting bar composition.
The free fatty acid component is preferably introduced into the soap mixtures of the present invention by addition of the free fatty acid to the soap mixture in the initial crutching stage. Alternatively, the free fatty acid component can be introduced prior to or during the aeration stage where perfume and other additives, if desired, are incorporated into the soap mixture. The free fatty acid component can also be introduced as a prepared mixture of soap and free fatty acid, such as an acid-reacting mixture of soap and free fatty acid prepared by under-neutralization in the soap making process.
The bars of this invention can show a mildness improvement without free fatty acids as the result of the presence of the specific fatty acid soaps, either alone or in combination with the sucrose and/or hydrophobic material.
The bars of this invention do not require the optional ingredients, thus zero is the lowest level for each optional ingredient. Some preferred bars contain from about 1% to about 65% of selected optional ingredients.
The levels set out in Other Ingredients Table are particularly illustrative for bars containing other optional ingredients.
OTHER INGREDIENTS TABLE______________________________________Practical Wt. % of Other Ingredients More Most Preferred Preferred Preferred______________________________________Filler Salts and 0.5-50% 0.75-25% 1-15%Salt HydratesWater-Soluble 1.0-50% 2-40% 5-20%OrganicsPolymeric Mildness 0.25%-20% 0.5%-10% 1-5%EnhancersOther Impalpable 1-40% 2-30% 4-25%Water-insolublesAluminosilicates/Clay 0.5-25% 1-10% 3-8%______________________________________
The bar soap compositions of the present invention can contain other additives commonly included in toilet bars such as perfumes, other fillers, sanitizing or antimicrobial agents, dyes, and the like.
Polymeric skin mildness aids are disclosed in the Small et al. and Medcalf et al. patents. The cationic synthetic polymers useful in the present invention are cationic polyalkylene imines, ethoxypolyalklene imines, and poly[N-[-3-(dimethylammonio)propyl]-N'-[3-(ethyleneoxyethylene dimethylammonio)propyl]urea dichloride] the latter of which is available from Miranol Chemical Co., Inc., under the trademark of Miranol A-15, CAS Reg. No. 68555-36-2.
Preferred cationic polymeric skin conditioning agents of the present invention are those cationic polysaccharides of the cationic guar gum class with molecular weights of 1,000 to 3,000,000. More preferred molecular weights are from 2,500 to 350,000. These polymers have a polysaccharide backbone comprised of galactomannan units and a degree of cationic substitution ranging from about 0.04 per anhydroglucose unit to about 0.80 per anhydroglucose unit with the substituent cationic group being the adduct of 2,3-epoxypropyltrimethyl ammonium chloride to the natural polysaccharide backbone. Examples are JAGUAR C-14-S, C-15 and C-17 sold by Celanese Corporation. In order to achieve the benefits described in this invention, the polymer must have characteristics, either structural or physical which allow it to be suitably and fully hydrated and subsequently well incorporated into the soap matrix.
A mild skin cleansing bar of the present invention can contain from about 0.5% to about 20% of a mixture of a silicone gum and a silicone fluid wherein the gum:fluid ratio is from about 10:1 to about 1:10, preferably from about 4:1 to about 1:4, most preferably from about 3:2 to about 2:3.
Silicone gum and fluid blends have been disclosed for use in shampoos and/or conditioners in U.S. Pat. No.: 4,906,459, Cobb et al., issued Mar. 6, 1990; U.S. Pat. No. 4,788,006, Bolich, Jr. et al., issued Nov. 29, 1988; U.S. Pat. No. 4,741,855, Grote et al., issued May 3, 1988; U.S. Pat. No. 4,728,457, Fieler et al., issued Mar. 1, 1988; U.S. Pat. No. 4,704,272, Oh et al., issued Nov. 3, 1987; and U.S. Pat. No. 2,826,551, Geen, issued Mar. 11, 1958, all of said patents being incorporated herein by reference.
The silicone component can be present in the bar at a level which is effective to deliver a &kin mildness benefit, for example, from about 0.5% to about 20%, preferably from about 1.5% to about 16%, and most preferably from about 3% to about 12% of the composition. Silicone fluid, as used herein, denotes a silicone with viscosities ranging from about 5 to about 600,000 centistokes, most preferably from about 350 to about 100,000 centistokes, at 25.degree. C. Silicone gum, as used herein, denotes a silicone with a mass molecular weight of from about 200,000 to about 1,000,000 and with a viscosity of greater than about 600,000 centistokes. The molecular weight and viscosity of the particular selected siloxanes will determine whether it is a gum or a fluid. The silicone gum and fluid are mixed together and incorporated into the compositions of the present invention.
Other ingredients of the present invention are selected for the various applications. E.g., perfumes can be used in formulating the skin cleansing products, generally at a level of from about 0.1% to about 2.0% of the composition. Alcohols, hydrotropes, colorants, and fillers such as talc, clay, water-insoluble, impalpable calcium carbonate, starch, and dextrin can also be used. The preferred bar of this invention contains from about 3% to about 5% impalpables, preferably, calcium carbonate. These additives make the finished bar compositions either more attractive or effective without detracting from the desirable attributes of the bar. Cetearyl alcohol is a mixture of cetyl and stearyl alcohols. Preservatives, e.g., sodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA), generally at a level of less than 1% of the composition, can be incorporated in the cleansing products to prevent color and odor degradation. Antibacterials can also be incorporated, usually at levels up to 1.5%. The above patents disclose or refer to such ingredients and formulations which can be used in the bars of this invention, and are incorporated herein by reference.
Some bars of this invention contain at least about 1% of another bar ingredient selected from: other soaps, moisturizers, colorants, solvents, fillers, synthetic detergent surfactants, polymeric skin feel and mildness aids, perfumes, preservatives, and mixtures thereof.
Compatible salt and salt hydrates can be used as fillers. Some preferred salts are sodium chloride, sodium sulfate, disodium hydrogen phosphate, sodium pyrophosphate, sodium tetraborate.
Generally, compatible salts and salt hydrates include the sodium, potassium, magnesium, calcium, aluminum, lithium, and ammonium salts of inorganic acids and small (6 carbons or less) carboxylic or other organic acids, corresponding hydrates, and mixtures thereof, are applicable. The inorganic salts include chloride, bromide, sulfate, metasilicate, orthophosphate, pyrophosphate, polyphosphate, metaborate, tetraborate, and carbonate. The organic salts include acetate, formate, methyl sulfate, and citrate.
Water-soluble organics can also be used to stabilize the appearance of the bar soaps of the present invention. Some preferred water-soluble organics are propylene glycol, glycerine, ethylene glycol, sucrose, and urea, and other compatible polyols.
A particularly suitable water-soluble organic is propylene glycol. Other compatible organics include polyols, such as ethylene glycol or 1,7-heptane-diol, respectively the mono- and polyethylene and propylene glycols of up to about 8,000 molecular weight, any mono-C.sub.1-4 alkyl ethers thereof, sorbitol, glycerol, glycose, diglycerol, sucrose, lactose, dextrose, 2-pentanol, 1-butanol, mono- di- and triethanolamine, 2-amino-1-butanol, and the like, especially the polyhydric alcohols.
Water-soluble amine salts can also be used. Monoethanolamine, diethanolamine, and triethanolamine (TEA) chloride salts are preferred.
Aluminosilicates and other clays are useful in the present invention. Some preferred clays are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,605,509 and 4,274,975, incorporated herein by reference.
Other types of clays include zeolite, kaolinite, montmorillonite, attapulgite, illite, bentonite, and halloysite. Another preferred clay is kaolin.
Preferred Bar Processing
The following process is used to make the exemplified freezer bars of the present invention. The process comprises the following steps:
Step 1--Mixing
I. from about 25% or 30% to about 60% or 70% of soap (depending on the formula) by weight of said bar, said soap consisting essentially of: saturated fatty acid soaps selected from the group consisting of: myristic, palmitic, and stearic acid soaps and mixtures thereof; wherein said soap counter ion is selected from the group consisting of sodium and potassium soap (Na/K); said Na/K soap having a percentage of from about 100/0 to about 75/25;
II. from about 5% to about 30% of a lathering synthetic surfactant by weight of said bar; and
III. from about 15% to about 30% of water by weight of said bar; and
wherein said soap and said lathering synthetic surfactant have a ratio of from about 5:1 to about 1:1, preferably from about 4:1 to about 1:1;
fatty acids, sugar, wax, and other ingredients are mixed at a temperature of from about 65.degree. C. to about 74.degree. C. (from about 150.degree. F. to about 165.degree. F.); soap is made in situ by blending the selected fatty acids into dilute NAOH and KOH at an initial temperature of from about 52.degree. C. to about 57.degree. C. (125.degree.-135.degree. F.) and a final temperature of from about 85.degree. C. to about 99.degree. C. (185.degree.-210.degree. F.); the other ingredients are added; and wherein, if and when said mix is dried to reduce the amount of said water, preferably said sugar/sucrose is added after said drying or in place of drying.
Step 2
Aerate (optional) said mix and add perfume with positive displacement pump or other in line mixer.
Step 3
Cool the mix using a scraped wall heat exchanger (freezer) to partially crystallize the components from an initial temperature of from about 79.degree. C. to about 99.degree. C. (from about 175.degree. F. to about 210.degree. F.) to a final temperature of from about 46.degree. C. to about 66.degree. C. (115.degree.-155.degree. F.), preferably from about 49.degree. C. to about 60.degree. C. (120.degree.-140.degree. F.).
Step 4
Cooled mix of Step 3 is extruded out onto a moving belt as a soft plug which is then cooled and fully crystallized and then stamped and packaged.
A preferred mild, lathering personal cleansing freezer soap bar with reduced bathtub ring is made by mixing any of the preferred formulae in Step 1, e.g.,
I. from about 30% to about 70% of total fatty acid soap by weight of said bar, said total soap comprising:
(a) saturated fatty acid soaps selected from the group consisting of: myristic, palmitic, and stearic acid soaps and mixtures thereof at a level of from about 75% to about 100% by weight of total fatty acid soap; and
(b) from 0% to about 25% of soap selected from the group consisting of: oleic and lauric acid soaps and minor fatty acid soap selected from the group consisting essentially of: C.sub.8, C.sub.10, C.sub.18:2 and mixtures thereof;
wherein said soap counter ion is selected from the group consisting of sodium and potassium soap (Na/K); said Na/K soap having a percentage ratio of from about 100/0 to about 75/25;
wherein said oleic soap level is from 0% to about 10% by weight of the bar; and
said lauric soap is from 0% to about 10% by weight of said bar; and
wherein said minor (C.sub.8, C.sub.10, C.sub.18:2) soap level is from 0% to about 5% by weight of said bar; and
II. from about 5% to about 30% of a lathering synthetic surfactant by weight of said bar;
III. from about 5% to about 30% of a nonreducing sugar;
IV. from about 0.2% to about 35% of a hydrophobic material as defined herein; and
V. from about 15% to about 30% of water by weight of said bar; and
wherein said total soap and said lathering synthetic surfactant have a ratio of from about 5/1 to about 1/1, preferably from about 4/1 to about 1/1.
A process for making a nonaerated soap bar from the composition comprises the steps of:
1. Mixing any of the formulae of this invention as above;
2. Cooling said mix of Step 1 to a temperature as above; and
3. Forming said nonaerated bars (plugs) from said cooled mix as above.
The optimum mixing temperatures of the above steps can vary depending on the particular formulation. Preferably, the formed soap bars (plugs) of Step 4 are formed from a mix which is cooled sufficiently to provide free standing bars (plugs). The preferred process does not require a moisture reduction step. The plugs are preferably formed via an extrusion operation, as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 3,835,058, supra.
Nonaerated freezer bar soap compositions preferably contain less than about 5% of organic solvents, e.g., alcohols, etc. Preferably they contain less than 3% of such organic solvents and, more preferably, from 0% to less than about 1% of such organic solvents is added. A preferred process does not have a drying step.
In a continuous freezer bar process the formed bars (plugs) stand up on a belt. Many cast bar compositions which use higher levels of water and/or organic solvent, e.g., 40-50% water, will not hold their forms or stand up on a freezer bar belt.
Frequently, some of the composition crystallizes in the freezer in order to provide sufficient viscosity to stand up on the belt, while further crystallization occurs after exiting the freezer, resulting in hardening of the bar. For some preferred bars, the later crystallization results in substantial structure of the type disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/617,827, supra, incorporated herein by reference.
The formed freezer bars (plugs) containing sucrose can be formulated to hold their forms and stand up on the belt. In the freezer step, lowering the temperature of the composition by a delta of from about 10.degree. C. to about 60.degree. C., preferably by a delta of from about 15.degree. C. to about 50.degree. C., is sufficient to create a dimensionally stable plug that does not slump while being processed. Needless to say, the elimination of a costly and time consuming moisture or solvent reducing (drying) step in a freezer bar process or a cast bar process is an advantage. See the Figure of U.S. Pat. No. 3,835,058, supra, for a schematic drawing of a prior art continuous freezer soap bar making process with a moisture reducing step.
Performance Test Method
Bathtub Ring (BTR) Test
Principle:
The performance test measures how well bar soaps inhibit bathtub scum (BTR) formation in hard water. Specifically, the curd grade is a measure of how much curd will cover the entire tub surface after water is drained, the ring grade is a measure of how much scum is left on the wall of the tub after water is drained, and the water appearance grade is measured by grading the water in the tub after use. All three grades are used.
This condition in the home would be resembled by a standard BTR test after completion of a lathering test prior to the draining of a basin used in the test.
After the water in the basin has been stirred and the surface has come to rest, a grading of the water appearance should be undertaken. The water appearance should be rated on the 1 to 10 scale.
Accumulation of floating soap particles, water cloudiness and other residue would be found on the lower end of the grading scale. The upper part of the scale should be free of the above-mentioned and should preferably be as clear as possible under the circumstances.
Therefore, the CB shown in the Examples should receive a grade of 3; ZEST.RTM., a milled bar soap (commercially available), should be graded 7. E.g., ZEST.RTM. Lot 817A has marked ingredients of: sodium tallowate, sodium cocoate, sodium cocoglyceryl ether sulfonate, magnesium tallowate, water, sodium sulfate, magnesium cocoate, sodium chloride, lauric acid, triclocarban, sodium silicate, masking fragrance, titanium dioxide, and chromium green. This would give room for grading of worse conditions than seen with the CB soap and improvements going beyond the range of ZEST.RTM., which is a standard for low BTR. Other soap bars are usually found between these two grading points and a reasonable graduation and ranking of products tested should be assured.
Method:
Put rubber stopper in hole in dishpan. Rinse the dishpan with tap water and then with 0 grain water. Add hardness solution to equal 14 grain hardness with one gallon 0 grain water at 100.degree. F. Stick a black tile to the side of the dishpan by means of a suction cup. Dry hands, add 0.2 cc soil to hands and rub into palms.
Place the bar to be tested in one hand and then gently place soiled hands in the pan of water for 5 seconds. Remove hands from water and rotate the bar in the hands 10 times (5 complete revolutions) in approximately 10 seconds. Lay the bar aside; per a dispensing measurer, add 2 ml of water to the palm of one hand to add a little more moisture (this gives more voluminous lather). Rub the palms in a circular motion 5 times and then work up a lather by rotating and rubbing the hands together 10 revolutions in approximately 20 seconds. Gently place the hands in the dishpan at the far end and rinse them by pulling them back through the water and lifting them out at the back sides of the pan.
Wait one minute.
Repeat the lathering procedure described above, however, do not add soil to the hands for this second washing.
Wait for 3 minutes.
Using the fingertips (fingers slightly apart), gently stroke the water 5 times from one end of the pan to the other.
Wait 10 seconds for the water to calm and grade for water appearance.
Pull stopper from hole and let water drain from pan, or use siphon hose if using a pan with no drain hole.
Remove the tile from the dishpan and dip the tile to rinse it off in a beaker or bucket of 0 grain water. Set the tile aside for one hour before grading for tub ring. Grade the curd on sides and bottom of pan immediately following rinsing.
Clean the dishpan under running tap water, wiping with a sponge or cloth to remove the residue left in the pan prior to conducting the next BTR test.
The bars of this invention have BTR grades of from about 4 to about 8. BTR grades of from about 5 to about 7 are preferred. The bars of this invention are also milder than the CB freezer bar standard.
Bar Soap Handwash Lather Volume Test
The handwash lather test is used to provide in-use lather volume measurements for the lather performance of skin cleansing bars. The test measures both the ultimate lather volume generated and the volume which is generated after a very short lathering period (to reflect lathering ease). The lather volumes are generated under soil-loaded conditions.
Synthetic soil is used for the soil-loaded lather volume test reported herein. Its formula and procedure for making it are set out below.
______________________________________Synthetic SoilIngredients Wt. %______________________________________Hyfac 430.sup.a 1.87Lauric Acid.sup.b 1.42Neo-fat 14.sup.c 5.68Neo-fat 16.sup.d 11.16Neo-fat 18.sup.e 5.40Neo-fat 90-04.sup.f 9.81Industrene 226.sup.g 1.26Paraffin Wax 7.30Squalane.sup.h 3.70Lanolin Anhydrous 19.40Coconut Oil 3.30Tallow 29.70 100.00%______________________________________ .sup.a Emery Industries, Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio .sup.b Emery Industries, Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio .sup.c Armour Industrial Chemical Co., Chicago, Illinois .sup.d Armour Industrial Chemical Co., Chicago, Illinois .sup.e Armour Industrial Chemical Co., Chicago, Illinois .sup.f Armour Industrial Chemical Co., Chicago, Illinois .sup.g Humko Products, Memphis, Tennessee .sup.h Robeco Chemicals, Inc., New York, New York
Procedure
1. Heat above materials together stirring continuously between 160.degree.-175.degree. F.
2. Mix 25 parts of above formula with 25 parts of a 5% to 80% tallow/20% coconut soap solution and 50 parts of distilled water at 150.degree. F.
3. Cool mixture to room temperature while stirring constantly.
4. Store in covered glass container.
Equipment
The following equipment is used:
1. Water source and sink with temperature control. The water source should be medium hardness (6-9 grain/gallon) for most testing, although water of lower and higher hardness can be used for special purposes.
2. Synthetic soil (see above Table).
3. Paper towels.
4. Test bars.
5. Control bars.
Procedure
The following procedure is used:
1. Set temperature at 95.degree.-100.degree. F.
2. Rub 0.22 cc of soil on hands.
3. Wet hands.
4. Rotate bar 3 times in both hands.
5. Add a little water, rub both hands 5 times.
6. Rotate hands 3 times (without soap), grade for flash volume.
7. Rotate 7 more times, grade for ultimate volume.
8. Collect lather and deposit on sink top.
9. Compare volume with standard bar target volume and assign grade.
Grading Scale
Soil Loaded
7. Exceptional
6. Very much higher than target
5. Higher than target
4. Target volume
3. Slightly lower than target
2. Lower than target
The bars of this invention have improved bathtub ring (BTR) over the exemplified mild all soap and combo freezer bars of commonly assigned, copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/707,520, Moroney et al., filed May 30, 1991, incorporated herein by reference.
EXAMPLES
The following Examples illustrate the practice of this invention and are not intended to be limiting.
All percentages, parts and ratios herein are by weight unless otherwise specified. All levels and ranges, temperatures, results, etc., used herein are approximations unless otherwise specified. The levels of soaps are given as a total soap weight percent (wt. %), as well as a bar weight percent (wt. %).
The free fatty acids used in the Examples are used at about the same ratio as the fatty acid soaps.
The soaps are made in situ, unless otherwise specified.
The soap bar compositions of the Examples are mixed at a temperature of about 190.degree. F. (88.degree. C.), aerated and pumped into a scraped wall heat exchanger. The aerated mix is cooled and then extruded at a freezer outlet temperature of 64.degree. C. (147.degree. F.) and bar plugs are cut and conditioned. The final bars are then stamped.
COMPARATIVE BAR VS. EXAMPLE 1
______________________________________COMPARATIVE BAR VS. EXAMPLE 1Approximate Chain Length Distribution (Wt. %)(The percent by weight of total soap is given parenthetically) Comparative Bar (CB) Example 1 Na/K Ratio 80/20 85/15 In Bar In Soap In Bar In SoapIngredeint Wt. % Wt. % Wt. % Wt. %______________________________________C.sub.8 1.30 (1.73) -- (--)C.sub.10 1.10 (1.47) -- (--)C.sub.12 9.40 (12.53) 3.33 (10.00)C.sub.14 6.00 (8.00) 3.33 (10.00)C.sub.16 16.80 (22.40) 13.31 (40.00)C.sub.18 13.60 (18.13) 13.31 (40.00)C.sub.18:1 24.90 (33.20) -- (--)C.sub.18:2 1.90 (2.53) -- (--)Total Soap 75.69 33.28Water 23.76 23.00Sucrose -- 7.00Paraffin (M.P. -- 11.0052-79.degree. C.)Sodium Coconut Alkyl -- 6.50Glyceryl EtherSulfonate (AGS)FFA (same as soap) -- 1.00Free Caustic 0.05 --Coco Amido -- 3.75Propyl BetaineSodium Lauroyl -- 12.00SarcosinateMinors (Perfumes, 0.50 2.47Preservatives)Totals 100.00 100.00BTR 3/3/3 5/5/4(Water/Curd/Tile)Soil Lathers 5.0/5.5 4.0/5.0(Flash/Ultimate)______________________________________
In Example 1 the C.sub.14, C.sub.16, and C.sub.18 soap is 90% by weight of total soap. Advantages of Example 1 versus the Comparative Bar and other mild bars are:
1. Example 1 has much better (less) BTR than the Comparative Bar (CB).
2. Example 1 is much milder than CB.
3. Example 1 has a creamier lather than the Comparative Bar.
4. Example 1 is made by using a simpler process than CB.
5. Example 1 does not wear away as fast as other bars in its mildness class (e.g., Neutrogena.RTM.).
6. Example 1 is less expensive than other bars in its mildness class.
Example 1 has C.sub.12 at 3.33%; CB has C.sub.12 at 9.40%; CB has C.sub.18:1 at 24.9% by wt. % of bar, and Example 1 has C.sub.18:1 at 0% by wt. % of bar.
The Comparative Bar (CB) contains a total of about 75% soap by weight of the bar and the C.sub.12 and C.sub.18:1 content by weight of total soap is 45.7% (12.5% and 33.2%); the bar wt. % of C.sub.12 and C.sub.18:1 for CB is 34.3%, which is well over the maximum level for the bar of the present invention.
Example 1 is significantly better than the Comparative Bar (CB), in reduced bathtub ring, and in the forearm wash mildness test, significantly milder than a very mild, commercially available combo bar, Neutrogena.RTM. Dry Skin Formula:
______________________________________Approximate Neutrogena .RTM. FormulaIngredient Wt %______________________________________Na 80T/20Cn Soap 30TEA 80T/20Cn Soap 30Free TEA 15Glycerine 10Nonionic Surfactant 8.4Water 5.5Minors 1.1Total 100.0______________________________________
The forearm wash test is a modified Lukacovic, Dunlap, Michaels, Visscher, and Watson: "Forearm wash test to evaluate the clinical mildness of cleansing products," J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem., 39, 355-366 (November/December 1988). One week of testing and 4 washes per day are used instead of two weeks and 2 washes per day.
EXAMPLES 2 AND 3
______________________________________EXAMPLES 2 and 3Approximate Length Distribution (Wt. %)(The percent by weight of total soap is given parenthetically) Example 2 Example 3 Na/K Ratio 100/0 100/0 In Bar In Soap In Bar In SoapIngredient Wt. % Wt. % Wt. % Wt. %______________________________________C.sub.12 4.07 (13.00) 8.14 (26.00)C.sub.14 4.43 (14.00) 9.40 (30.00)C.sub.16 11.9 (38.00) 8.77 (28.00)C.sub.18 10.96 (35.00) 5.01 (16.00)Total Soap 31.32 31.32Water 23.00 23.00Sucrose 8.00 8.00Paraffin (M.P. 12.00 12.0052-79.degree. C.)12Sodium Coconut Alkyl 7.00 7.00Glyceryl EtherSulfonate (AGS)FFA (same as soap) 2.00 2.00Coco Amido 4.00 4.00Propyl BetaineSodium Lauroyl 10.5 10.00SarcosinateMinors (Perfumes, 2.18 2.18Preservatives)Totals 100.00 100.00BTR 5/5/4 6/6/5(Water/Curd/Tile)Soil Lather 4.5/4.5 5.0/5.5(Flash/Ultimate)______________________________________
Example 3 is not preferred for mildness because of its 26% by weight of soap level of C.sub.12 soap.
Examples 2, 3, 6 and 7 are freezer bar formulations screened as framed bars to study BTR and lather. In Examples 2 and 3, the respective C.sub.14, C.sub.16, and C.sub.18 soaps are about 87% and 84% by weight of total soap. The relative bathtub ring performances of these Examples are significantly better than the Comparative Bar (CB) and they are milder than CB.
EXAMPLES 4 AND 5
______________________________________EXAMPLES 4 and 5Approximate Chain Length Distribution (Wt. %)(The percent by weight of total soap is given parenthetically) Example 4 Example 5 Na/K Ratio 100/0 100/0 In Bar In Soap In Bar In SoapIngredient Wt. % Wt. % Wt. % Wt. %______________________________________C.sub.14 1.11 (2.5) 33.10 (100)C.sub.16 23.07 (52.0) -- (--)C.sub.18 20.18 (45.5) -- (--)Total Soap 44.36 33.10Water 24.00 25.50FFA (same as soap) 1.17 1.10Coco Amido 9.34 5.52Propyl BetaineSodium Lauroyl 11.67 7.72SarcosinateNaCl 3.11 1.15Propylene Glycol 5.84 --Petrolatum -- 22.07Alto White Clay -- 3.31Minors (Perfumes, 0.51 0.53Preservatives)Totals 100.00 100.00BTR 6/6/5 4/3/4(Water/Curd/Tile)Soil Lather 4.0/4.5 4.0/4.0(Flash/Ultimate)Freezer Outlet 139.degree. F. 143.degree. F.Temperature (59.degree. C.) (62.degree. C.)______________________________________
EXAMPLES 6 AND 7
______________________________________EXAMPLES 6 and 7Approximate Chain Length Distribution (Wt. %)(The percent by weight of total soap is given parenthetically) Example 6 Example 7 Na/K Ratio 85/15 100/0 In Bar In Soap In Bar In SoapIngredient Wt. % Wt. % Wt. % Wt. %______________________________________C.sub.14 8.14 (26.00) -- (--)C.sub.16 11.9 (38.00) 15.66 (--)C.sub.18 11.28 (36.00) 15.66 (--)C.sub.18:1 5.01 (16.00) -- (--)Total Soap 31.32 31.32Water 23.00 23.00Sucrose 8.00 8.00Paraffin (M.P. 12.00 12.0052-79.degree. C.)12Sodium Coconut Alkyl 7.00 7.00Glyceryl EtherSulfonate (AGS)FFA (same as soap) 2.00 2.00Coco Amido 4.00 4.00Propyl BetaineSodium Lauroyl 10.5 10.5SarcosinateMinors (Perfumes, 2.18 2.18Preservatives)Totals 100.00 100.00BTR 6/6/5 7/7/6(Water/Curd/Tile)Soil Lather 5.0/5.5 4.0/4.5(Flash/Ultimate)______________________________________
In example 4 and 7, the respective C.sub.14, C.sub.16, and C.sub.18 soap is 100% by weight of the total soap. The bathtub ring performance of these bars is much better than CB and they are milder than CB.
The bars of Examples 1-7 are milder, have significantly better (less) BTR than the Comparative Bar (CB), which is representative of the prior art. The Comparative Bar is the standard freezer bar for lather.
Additionally, Example 1 is significantly milder than the Comparative Bar (CB), in a forearm wash test, and is significantly milder than a very mild, commercially available combo bar, Neutrogena.RTM. Dry Skin Formula.

Number	Name	Date
3835058	White	Sep 1974
4493786	Joshi	Jan 1985
4557853	Collins	Dec 1985
4946618	Knochel et al.	Aug 1990
4963284	Novakovic et al.	Oct 1990
5204014	Redd et al.	Apr 1993

Number	Date	Country
350306	Jan 1990	EPX
57030798	Jul 1980	JPX

Personal cleansing freezer bar with selected fatty acid soaps and synthetic surfactant for reduced bathtub ring, improved mildness, and good lather

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

US Classifications

Field of Search

US

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

US Referenced Citations (6)

Foreign Referenced Citations (2)

Non-Patent Literature Citations (4)