Patent Application
20150140041
The instant application contains a Sequence Listing which has been submitted electronically in ASCII format and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Said ASCII copy, created on Jan. 9, 2015, is named 34427-0002_SL.txt and is 150,143 bytes in size.
This invention relates to the identification of mutations in expressed genes of cancer cells from cancer patients and use of the mutations to prepare cancer vaccines and adoptive immune cell therapies.
Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the US. The estimates for 2010 are that approximately 570,000 people will die from cancer and 1.5 million new cases will be diagnosed (1). For early stage cancers (those that have not spread to the lymph nodes and are non-metastatic) surgical removal is a very effective treatment. However, for more advanced cases, standard, non-specific cancer treatments (chemo and radiotherapy) are used. These treatments affect many healthy cells and result in elevated toxicity. One of the most important principles of medical ethics, “primum non nocere” (first do no harm), is often not applicable in the treatment of cancer, where patients are submitted to very toxic therapeutic protocols that are effective in only a percentage of treated individuals. Moreover, even individuals that initially are treated successfully are at risk for relapses, and become more difficult to treat for each succeeding relapse.
The idea of employing the adaptive immune system to kill cancer cells without harming normal cells has been a goal for many decades (for review see Dunn 2002 (2)). To become a cancer cell, a healthy cell undergoes multiple somatic mutations (3, 4). Such mutations may be targets of the adaptive immune system, which performs the function of recognizing and eliminating small variations from self. The possibility of using immunotherapy for successfully treating cancers is gaining support due to findings that (a) tumor-specific lymphocytes can be isolated from patients with tumors (6, 7); (b) the presence of tumor-specific lymphocytes infiltrating the tumor (or in circulation) correlate with good prognosis (8); and (c) antigens recognized by T lymphocytes on the tumor cell have been identified (9, 10, 12). Also related are (a) the demonstrated effectiveness of adoptive cellular immunotherapy for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and lymphomas associated with the Epstein Barr virus (EBV) in patients that underwent bone marrow transplantation (BMT) (11), and (b) the success of adoptive cell therapy in the treatment of patients with metastatic melanomas (7).
However, tumor antigen identification and its translation to immunotherapy still face many problems. Therefore, being able to define antigens in an easier and more efficient manner is an advantage. The process of identifying and utilizing antigens, as described herein, allows for the individualized diagnosis and treatment of patients which increase the likelihood of treatment success.
Provided herein are methods to identify mutations in expressed genes of cancer cells from cancer patients and to use the mutations to prepare cancer vaccines and adoptive immune cell therapies for treating the cancer patients. Nucleic acid sequences from the cancer cells are obtained by a parallel sequencing platform, which employs parallel processing of the nucleic acid of cancer cells leading to sequence reads and mapping of the sequence reads to a database with reference gene sequences. In some embodiments, the parallel sequencing platform employs certain filtering of the sequencing results such as a depth of coverage less than 20× and/or by not filtering with a base alignment quality (BAQ) algorithm. The many existing algorithms that can be used to define the mutations can give different results. The tendency is to reduce the number of false positives in order to maximize the reproducibility of the results. The presently claimed methods, however, allow for more false positives in order to avoid false negatives. Regarding false positives and false negatives, appropriate filtering methods can be used to compensate for any occurrences of a high number of variants (e.g., in vitro immunogenicity and/or selection of preferred amino acids).
Mutant sequences which code for all or a portion of an expressed gene are identified as those which have a mutant position amino acid which substitutes for a wildtype position amino acid located at the same position in the wildtype sequence of the protein.
A further selection of mutant sequences can be achieved by identifying an HLA class and/or HLA supertype of the cancer patient and then selecting one or more amino acids for the particular HLA class and/or HLA supertype as the mutant position amino acid and/or wildtype position amino acid. Candidate mutant position amino acid and/or wildtype position amino acid for each HLA class and/or HLA supertype are shown in
In accordance with the invention, peptides containing mutant sequences of interest are evaluated for their ability to bind to HLA histocompatibility antigens of the cancer patient. This can be carried out in silico using computer-based algorithm(s) for predicting HLA binding peptides. Alternatively, or in addition, the ability to bind to HLA histocompatibility antigens is carried out by synthesizing the peptides and testing them for binding to HLA histocompatibility antigens. The testing of sequences for binding to HLA histocompatibility antigens is not a requirement but may be used to narrow the set of potential cancer antigens prior to further testing. A “potential cancer antigen” as used herein is a nucleic or amino acid sequence having any change at the level of DNA, RNA, or protein that results in a polypeptide differing from the wild type (e.g., fusion, splice variant, and any other change in the genome that leads to a protein with an amino acid sequence that differs from the non-tumor cell) and can be presented to and recognized by the immune system as such. Potential cancer antigens may be referred to herein as mutations.
In further embodiments, peptides containing the mutant sequences of interest may be synthesized and evaluated for activating cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) cell lines prepared from the cancer patient or from an HLA-matched donor (matched for class and/or supertype). In such cases, the CTLs or other T cell lines are obtained by contacting two cell types: mononuclear cells from the cancer patient or from the HLA-matched donor and cancer cells from the cancer patient. The CTL cell lines, for example, may be prepared using mononuclear cells that are enriched in CD8+ cells and may further include the addition of autologous CD4+ T cells and/or dendritic cells from the cancer patient or autologous CD4+ T cells and/or dendritic cells from the HLA-matched donor. The CD4 T cells can be induced by class II restricted epitopes derived from the cancer cell or can be a peptide known to stimulate these t cells (for example a tetanus toxoid derived peptide). In embodiments in which only the peptides are used to stimulate the CTLs or other T cell lines, T cells donor matching on the HLA class and/or subtype is all that is required. As used herein, the term “donor” means a subject (who is not the tumor patient) who gives their cells to the patient in order to treat the patient's cancer (adoptive transfer). In the case of leukemia, the cells can be given before or after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In the case of a solid tumor, the cells can be given before or after other therapies. The donor can be a sibling who is matched or partially matched to the patient's HLA, a parent, whom shares a haplotype, an unrelated donor whom shares or partially shares the patient's HLA. The term “donor cells” is also used to indicate any cells that match at least one of the HLA alleles of the cancer patient (tumor patient) and are used to test the immunogenicity of potential cancer antigens. In this case, an HLA-transgenic animal is considered to be a donor (the mice can be vaccinated in vivo or in vitro to test the immunogenicity of the potential cancer antigen). The word “donor” is typically used when referring to embodiments of the invention that involve bone marrow transplantation. However, it is to be understood that as any person's lymphocytes that match the cancer patient at one of the HLA alleles to which the peptide binds or is expected to bind. In other words, the immunogenicity of the peptide does not need to be tested using the cells of the patient. It can be tested using cells from another person that shares at least one of the HLA, or can be tested by immunizing an HLA-transgenic animal.
In another embodiment, methods to identify mutations in expressed genes of cancer cells from cancer patients and to use the mutations to prepare cancer vaccines and adoptive immune cell therapies for treating the cancer patients involves obtaining nucleic acid sequences from the cancer cells by the parallel sequencing platform as discussed. Mutant sequences which code for all or a portion of an expressed gene are identified as those which have a mutant position amino acid which substitutes for a wildtype position amino acid located at the same position in the wildtype sequence of the protein. Peptides containing the mutant sequences of interest and optionally the corresponding wildtype sequence peptides are synthesized and evaluated for activating T lymphocytes cell lines (e.g., cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) cell lines) prepared from the cancer patient or from an HLA-matched donor. In such cases, the T lymphocytes cell lines (e.g., CTL cell lines) are obtained by contacting mononuclear cells from the cancer patient or from the HLA-matched donor with cancer cells from the cancer patient. The T lymphocytes cell lines (e.g., CTL cell lines) may be prepared using mononuclear cells that are enriched in CD8+ cells and may further include the addition of autologous CD4+ T cells and/or dendritic cells from the cancer patient or autologous CD4+ T cells and/or dendritic cells from the HLA-matched donor. The CD4 T cells can be induced by class II restricted epitope derived from the cancer cell or can be a peptide known to stimulate these T cells (for example, a tetanus toxoid derived peptide).
Specifically, in one aspect, the invention provides method of identifying cancer antigens for preparing a cancer vaccine, comprising
a) obtaining a plurality of mutant sequences from the nucleic acid of cancer cells from a cancer patient, said mutant sequences coding for all or a portion of an expressed gene and wherein the mutant sequences each have a mutant position amino acid which substitutes for a wildtype position amino acid, or other mutation (e.g., insertion or deletion, fusion, splice variant, and any other change in the genome that leads to a protein with an amino acid sequence that differs from the non-tumor cell), located at the same position in the wildtype sequence of the protein, wherein said mutant sequences are obtained using a parallel sequencing platform, said parallel sequencing platform employing parallel processing of said nucleic acid of cancer cells leading to sequence reads and mapping of the sequence reads to a database with reference gene sequences; and
b) selecting mutant sequences from those identified in step a) by identifying an HLA class or supertype of the cancer patient and then selecting an amino acid for said HLA class or supertype as the mutant position amino acid and/or wildtype position amino acid using
In another aspect the invention provides a method of identifying cancer antigens for preparing a cancer vaccine, comprising
a) obtaining a plurality of mutant sequences from the nucleic acid of cancer cells from a cancer patient, said mutant sequences coding for all or a portion of an expressed gene and wherein the mutant sequences each have a mutant position amino acid which substitutes for a wildtype position amino acid, or other mutation (e.g., insertion or deletion, fusion, splice variant, and any other change in the genome that leads to a protein with an amino acid sequence that differs from the non-tumor cell), located at the same position in the wildtype sequence of the protein, wherein said mutant sequences are obtained using a parallel sequencing platform, said parallel sequencing platform employing parallel processing of said nucleic acid of cancer cells leading to sequence reads and mapping of the sequence reads to a database with reference gene sequences; and
b) identifying at least one mutant sequence for preparing a cancer vaccine from the plurality of mutant sequences obtained in step a) by determining that at least one peptide encoded by the at least one mutant sequence binds to an HLA class or supertype of the cancer patient.
In such embodiments, the cancer antigen can be identified by testing its immunogenicity in vitro.
In another aspect, the invention provides a method for predicting the effectiveness of a therapy described herein (e.g., adoptive transfer and vaccination) by (a) identifying at least one mutant nucleic acid sequence from the patient (e.g., from the cancer of the patient), wherein the mutant sequence codes for all or a portion of an expressed gene and wherein the encoded protein or peptide comprises a mutant amino acid substitution or other mutation relative to the wildtype, and (b) determining the binding capacity of the mutant peptide with the HLA class or supertype of the patient, wherein the strength, amount, and/or capacity for HLA binding is indicative of the patient's likely responsiveness to therapy, wherein greater binding indicates higher responsiveness. The binding capacity may be determined either using in silico techniques, such as the ones described herein, or by in vitro testing in which the identified mutant peptide is assessed for binding to any one or more of the patient's HLA-expressing cells, as described herein, or to another cell expressing the same HLA class or supertype as the patient.
Also provided herein are mutant sequences associated with cancer, wherein the sequence is selected from any disclosed in
Further provided are cancer vaccines prepared using one or more of the cancer antigens identified by any of the above methods. The cancer vaccine may be a polypeptide that contains one or more of the cancer antigens or may be a nucleic acid that encodes for expression of one or more of the cancer antigens. It is to be understood that the antigen can be delivered any suitable way known in the art.
Yet further provided is a method of treating a cancer patient by identifying cancer antigens from nucleic acid obtained from cancer cells as described by any of the methods above and by preparing a vaccine with one or more of the cancer antigens. The patient is treated by administering the vaccine to generate T cells (e.g., CTLs) in the patient and/or by administering T cell lines (e.g., CTL cell lines) prepared in vitro by contacting mononuclear cells of the cancer patient or an HLA-matched subject (e.g., donor) with the cancer antigen vaccine, or by immunizing the donor with the vaccine and transferring immunized donor T cells (e.g., CTLs) to the cancer patient. A person with matching HLA (e.g., a bone marrow transplantation donor) can be vaccinated and cells recovered from the donor can be transferred to the patient (to be treated) or used to define the immunogenic cancer antigens. The contacting may include mononuclear cells that are enriched in cd8+ or the addition of autologous CD4+ T cells and/or dendritic cells from the cancer patient or from the HLA-matched donor. The CD4 T cells can be induced by class II restricted epitope derived from the cancer cell or can be a peptide known to stimulate these T cells (for example a tetanus toxoid derived peptide). In such an embodiment, these cells are essential for inducing a primary CD8+ response.
In another embodiment, cancer patients are treated by identifying cancer antigens from nucleic acids obtained from cancer cells as described by any of the methods above, by preparing a vaccine with one or more of the cancer antigens by contacting mononuclear cells of the cancer patient or an HLA-matched donor (matched for HLA class and/or supertype) with the cancer antigen vaccine to stimulate T cell lines (e.g., CTL cell lines), and by administering the T cell lines (e.g., CTL cell lines) to the cancer patient to treat the cancer. The contacting may include mononuclear cells that are enriched in CD8+ or the addition of autologous CD4+ T cells and/or dendritic cells from the cancer patient or from the HLA-matched donor. The CD4+ T cells can be induced by class II restricted epitope derived from the cancer cell or can be a peptide known to stimulate these T cells (for example, a tetanus toxoid derived peptide).
In one embodiment of a method of identifying cancer antigens for preparing a cancer vaccine, the method includes: a) obtaining a plurality of mutant sequences from the nucleic acid of cancer cells from a cancer patient, the mutant sequences coding for all or a portion of an expressed gene and wherein the mutant sequences each have a mutant position amino acid which substitutes for a wildtype position amino acid located at the same position in the wildtype sequence of the protein, wherein the mutant sequences are obtained using a parallel sequencing platform, the parallel sequencing platform employing parallel processing of said nucleic acid of cancer cells leading to sequence reads and mapping of the sequence reads to a database with reference gene sequences; and b) selecting mutant sequences from those identified in step a) by their ability to induce T cells that are specific for the cancer cells or by their ability to be recognized by patient cancer-specific T cells. In the method, cancer antigens for preparing a cancer vaccine are identified. The method can further include, prior to step b), identifying an HLA class or supertype of the cancer patient and then selecting an amino acid for said HLA class or supertype as the mutant position amino acid and/or wildtype position amino acid using
In one embodiment of the method, the parallel sequencing platform filters the sequencing results using a depth of coverage less than 20× and/or by not filtering with a base alignment quality (BAQ) algorithm. In the method, the mutant position amino can be phenylalanine, tyrosine, aspartic acid, glutamic acid, leucine, serine or threonine. Selecting mutant sequences identified in step a) by their ability to induce T cells that are specific for the cancer cells or by their ability to be recognized by cancer-specific T cells can include using T cells from a donor that is HLA-matched at least one allele or immunizing HLA-transgenic animals with the mutated peptides. In the method, cancer antigens for preparing a cancer vaccine are identified, and in some embodiments, the HLA class or supertype is HLA-1 and the mutant amino acid is phenylalanine, tyrosine, aspartic acid, glutamic acid, leucine, serine or threonine. In this embodiment, the cancer patient typically expresses the HLA class or supertype HLA-A1 histocompatibility antigen. In one embodiment of the method, the mononuclear cells are enriched in CD8+ cells, and contacting mononuclear cells from the cancer patient or from the HLA-matched donor with cancer cells from the cancer patient can further include mononuclear cells that are enriched in CD8+ or the addition of autologous CD4+ T cells and/or dendritic cells from the cancer patient or autologous CD4+ T cells and/or dendritic cells from the HLA-matched donor. The CD4+ T cells can be induced by a class II restricted epitope derived from the cancer cells or a peptide known to stimulate these CD4+ T cells.
a-c is a set of flow diagrams relating to the identification of mutations in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) cells from an HLA-A1 patient.
a-b is a second set of flow diagrams relating to the identification of mutations in the same acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) cells and donor cells used in
a and 8b are flow diagrams relating to the identification of mutations in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) cells from patient #2 as described in Example 3.
Identification of T cell antigens that can be used for immunotherapy still faces many problems. The search for the antigens has been very laborious and after an antigen is discovered, there is a strong tendency to generalize an antigen's applicability, assuming that an antigen that works for one individual will be an antigen to treat the same kind of tumor in another individual. This tendency is based on the notion that, to be useful, an antigen needs to work in the broadest possible patient population. This practice of “generalizing” tumor antigens does not account for the fact that each tumor expresses many unique antigens and that an individual's MHC molecules restrict the T cell response. Therefore, an antigen that is good for treating one individual might not be ideal for another person. Moreover, many of the antigens identified so far are normal tissue specific antigens, raising the problem of autoimmunity.
The present paradigm for the discovery and immunotherapeutic application of tumor antigens is to look for “universal” or common tumor antigens, i.e., antigens that induce good immunity in the majority of individuals and use these antigens for vaccination purposes. The results obtained with these approaches have been disappointing. The reality is that the best immune response will differ for each patient affected by a tumor. Only after the immune repertoire is identified for many individuals, using a systematic and unbiased approach, would it be possible to ascertain common patters of immunogenic mutations. For example, a finding that some genes were affected by common clusters of mutations may lead to the application of a less individualized therapy.
Provided herein are methods to identify the available mutations that constitute tumor-associated and/or tumor-rejection antigens in cancer cells from individual cancer patients and to use these cancer antigens to immunize T cells from the patient or HLA-matched subject's (e.g., donor) to recognize and kill the cancer cells. To this end, next generation sequencing will be used to sequence the transcriptome and the exome of the cancer cells as well as the exome of EBV lymphoblasts, or PHA stimulated T cells or PBMC from the cancer patient. In the specific case of leukemia, the control cells can be obtained from the PBMC using cells obtained from the patient in remission or purifying cells not belonging to the leukemic lineage (e.g., T or B cells in the case of myeloid leukemias or monocytes in the case of lymphocytic leukemias) from the cancer patient. In particular cancers that employ bone marrow transplantation (e.g. in leukemia), the sequenced exome from the cancer patient cells also can be compared to the exome from EBV lymphoblasts or T cells from an HLA-matched bone marrow subject (e.g., donor). This comparison will yield a comprehensive representation of the genes that will be translated into peptides and utilized in adoptive transfer therapy. In one embodiment, minor polymorphic variants that distinguish the patient from the donor can be used to completely eliminate the bone marrow of the patient, completely eliminating the leukemic cells of the patient. If used, these antigens will have to be shown to be expressed only by the bone marrow cells.
Next generation sequencing strategies make it possible to perform extensive molecular characterization of tumor cells in an attempt to identify genes involved in transformation. The information that can be obtained includes the copy number, level of expression, and somatic mutations.
As used herein, the terms “next generation sequencing” (“NGS”), “second generation sequencing” and “massively parallel sequencing” encompasses high-throughput sequencing methods that parallelize the sequencing process, producing thousands to millions of sequences at a time (16, 17). The number of sequences produced by parallelized sequencing is typically greater than 10,000, more typically greater than 100,000 and most typically greater than 1 million. NGS design is different from that of Sanger sequencing, also known as “capillary sequencing” or “first-generation sequencing,” which is based on electrophoretic separation of chain-termination products produced in individual sequencing reactions.
Although NGS platforms differ in engineering configurations and sequencing chemistry, common to most is the use of spatially separated, clonally amplified DNA templates or single DNA molecules processed in parallel by use of a flow cell. The massive quantity of output from parallel processing is transformed from primary imaging output or detection output into sequence. A package of integrated algorithms performs the core primary data transformation steps: image analysis, intensity scoring, base calling, and alignment of subsequence reads to a reference sequence. Reference sequences include the human reference genome NCBI37/hg19 sequence, which is available from Genome Bioinformatics Group of the University of California Santa Cruz (available on the world wide web). Other sources of public sequence information include GenBank, dbEST, dbSTS, EMBL (the European Molecular Biology Laboratory), and the DDBJ (the DNA Databank of Japan). Thus, NGS refers to a parallel sequencing platform that employs parallel processing of nucleic acid leading to sequence reads and mapping of the sequence reads to a database with reference gene sequences.
The present methods for selecting cancer specific sequences using NGS have the potential to identify rare mutants which may be lost when more extensive sequence filtering is used. Even a single tumor may contain different types of cancer cells and different types of stem cells that continue to replicate themselves and also give rise to the these types of cancer cells. The exclusion of filtering between the step of sequence alignment and selection of mutant sequence will likely result in more false positives but will provide rare sequence mutations that need to be immunized against to treat the cancer.
Sequence data from NGS systems can be filtered to provide early selective criteria which aids in accuracy. A common filter is the “depth of coverage,” “sequencing coverage” or “coverage depth,” which is the average number of times a given DNA nucleotide is represented in sequence reads (stated differently, this is the average number of reads covering any particular base) (see, e.g., Nielsen et al., Nature Reviews Genetics 12:443 2011) The greater the coverage, the greater the likelihood of accurately calling a sequence variation. For detection of cancer mutations as disclosed herein, a depth of coverage of <20× is used, however, more preferable coverage is <15×, <10×, <7×, <5×, <4×, <3×, <2×, and 1×. Depth of coverage also can be represented in the case of mutations as the average number of reads for the reference and variant combined for any particular base (e.g., the reference is the patient or donor EBV B cell sequences and the variant is the cancer cell sequences. A reference+variant(s)>=20 can be used to identify with confidence low depth for the cancer mutation (e.g. 18× for the reference plus 2× for the mutation).
Another filter is base alignment quality (BAQ), an approach that accurately measures the probability that a read base has been wrongly aligned (e.g., see Li, Bioinformatics; 27(8): 1157-1158 [2011]). Base alignment quality (BAQ) computation is turned on by default and adjusts depth of coverage values to better simulate local realignments. BAQ is a Phred-like score representing the probability that a read base is misaligned; it lowers the base quality score of mismatched reads that are near indels. This is to help rule out false positive SNP calls due to alignment artifacts near small indels. The filter can be adjusted by utilizing its parameters. One can disable BAQ with the −B parameter, or perform a more sensitive BAQ calculation with −E.
CodonCode Corporation (58 Beech Street Dedham, Mass. 02026) offers Windows, Mac OS X, and Unix versions of Phrap, Phred, and Cross_match, Phil Green's programs for sequence assembly, quality base calling, and fast sequence comparisons. CodonCode also offers Unix and Linux versions of Consed, David Gordon's contig editor and automated finishing tool for Phred and Phrap. After calling bases, Phred examines the peaks around each base call to assign a quality score to each base call. Quality scores range from 4 to about 60, with higher values corresponding to higher quality. The quality scores are logarithmically linked to error probabilities, as shown in the following table:
Another sequence data filter is probabilistic modeling, which employs algorithms to filter low frequency variants.
NGS sequencing technologies include pyrosequencing, sequencing-by-synthesis with reversible dye terminators, sequencing by oligonucleotide probe ligation and real time sequencing. NGS sequencing technologies are available commercially, such as the sequencing-by-hybridization platform from Affymetrix Inc. (Sunnyvale, Calif.) and the sequencing-by-synthesis platforms from 454 Life Sciences (Bradford, Conn.), Helicos Biosciences (Cambridge, Mass.), Illumina/Solexa (Hayward, Calif.), and the sequencing-by-ligation platform from Life Technologies (San Diego, Calif.). Several companies provide NGS sequencing direct to the consumer for $10,000 or less.
The first well known example of NGS sequencing technology is the 454 (Roche) Life sequencing system (e.g. see Margulies, M. et al. Nature 437:376-380 [2005]). In 454 sequencing, the DNA is first sheared into fragments of approximately 300-800 base pairs, and the fragments are blunt-ended. Oligonucleotide adaptors, which serve as primers for amplification and sequencing of the fragments, are ligated to the ends of the fragments. The adapted fragments are attached to DNA capture beads and the beads are individually PCR amplified within droplets of an oil-water emulsion to yield multiple copies of clonally amplified DNA fragments on each bead. The beads are captured in wells where pyrosequencing is performed on each DNA fragment in parallel. Pyrosequencing makes use of pyrophosphate (PPi) which is released upon nucleotide addition, is converted to ATP by ATP sulfurylase in the presence of adenosine 5′ phosphosulfate, the ATP then used to convert luciferin to oxyluciferin, generating light that is detected and measured.
Other exemplary NGS sequencing technologies include the Helicos True Single Molecule Sequencing (tSMS) (e.g. see Harris T. D. et al., Science 320:106-109 [2008]); the nanopore sequencing method (e.g. see Soni G V et al., Clin Chem 53: 1996-2001 [2007]); the chemical-sensitive field effect transistor (chemFET) array (e.g., see U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 20090026082); the Halcyon Molecular's method that uses transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (e.g., see PCT patent publication WO 2009/04644); Illumina's sequencing-by-synthesis and reversible terminator-based sequencing chemistry (e.g. see Bentley et al., Nature 6:53-59 [2009]); the SOLiD™ (Life Technologies) sequencing-by-ligation technology (e.g., see McKernan et al., Genome Research 19 (9): 1527-41 (2009]); Pacific Biosciences single molecule, real-time SMRT™ sequencing technology (e.g., see Levene et al., Science. 299 682-686 [2003]); and Life Technologies Ion Torrent single molecule sequencing on a semiconductor chip.
NGS can be used to generate a whole genome sequence or a subset of a whole genome sequence such as an exome sequence or a transcriptome sequence. As used herein, the term “genome sequence” can be referred to as a “genome library” or “genome library of sequences. Likewise, the terms “exome sequence” and “transcriptome sequence” can be referred to as an “exome library” or “exome library of sequences, or “transcriptome library” or “transcriptome library of sequences, respectively.
A whole genomic sequence is obtained by applying NGS to total genomic DNA. The exome represents the protein coding sequences of all genes in the genome. Exome sequence is obtained, for example, by preparing a genomic library and selecting exomic sequence using target-enrichment methods such as hybrid capture or in-solution capture. An exome library may contain intronic or other non-exon sequence as the enrichment may not be total. For example, exome libraries may be only about 50% pure with respect to exon sequences.
The mutant sequences from the cancer cells can be identified by whole transcriptome sequencing using known methods (13-15). The transcriptome is the set of all RNA molecules, including mRNA, rRNA, tRNA, and other non-coding RNA produced in one or a population of cells. The use of next-generation sequencing technology to study the transcriptome at the nucleotide level using cDNA libraries is known as RNA-Seq (e.g., see Wang et al., Nature Rev. Genetics 10(1): 57-63 [2009]). RNA-Seq provides insights at multiple levels into the transcription of the genome as it yields sequence, splicing, and expression-level information leading to the identification of novel transcripts and sequence alterations. Transcriptome sequence is also obtained by target-enrichment methods such as hybrid capture or in solution capture applied to RNA (e.g. oligonucleotide “bait” capture). RNA-seq does not require a reference genome to gain useful transcriptomic information. RNA-Seq approaches (e.g. see SOLiD™ Whole Transcriptome Analysis Kit from Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies Corporation) preserves strand specificity and can interrogate either polyA or ribo-depleted RNA. However, transcriptome sequences can be mapped to the RefSeq's mRNA database of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI).
The level of expression of gene sequence from NGS can be obtained by evaluation of NGS performed on the transcriptome library. The unit FPKM (expected fragments per kilobase of transcript per million fragments sequenced) provides a numerical value for the estimated proportion of each transcript.
Recent publications report that transcriptome sequencing, analyzing the complementary DNA (RNA-seq) (18), can be performed without the necessity to clone cDNA libraries or even to simply amplify the mRNA (19). The new methods eliminate steps that otherwise may incorporate errors due to RNA/DNA amplification and cloning. These new methods not only allow the detection of mutations but are also becoming an alternative to microarrays in studies involving gene expression and copy number alterations in genome-wide analysis.
Cancers suitable for analysis generally include carcinomas, leukemias or lymphomas, and sarcomas. Carcinomas may be of the breast, colon, rectum, lung, oropharynx, hypopharynx, esophagus, stomach, pancreas, liver, gallbladder and bile ducts, small intestine, urinary tract, female genital tract, male genital tract, endocrine glands, and skin. Other suitable cancers include hemangiomas, melanomas, and tumors of the brain, nerves, eyes, and meninges.
Sequence reads coming from NGS may code for all or a portion of an expressed gene in the cancer cell. Mutations of interest can result from a substitution of a wildtype amino acid but may also result from amino acid changes caused by deletions or insertions of nucleotide sequence in the encoding nucleic acid, by fusions, splice variants, or any other change(s) in the genome that leads to a protein with an amino acid sequence that differs from the non-tumor cell. As used herein, “mutation” means any change in a DNA sequence (or change in amino acid sequence) away from normal. Thus, when there is a normal allele that is prevalent in the population, a mutation changes this to a rare and abnormal variant. In contrast, a “polymorphism” is a DNA sequence variation that is common in the population. In this case no single allele is regarded as the standard sequence. Instead there are two or more equally acceptable alternatives for a wildtype sequence. As used herein, a cut-off point between a mutation and a polymorphism can be 1 per cent. Thus, a polymorphism arises when the least common allele has frequency of at least 1 per cent in the population. If the frequency is lower than 1%, the allele is regarded as a mutation. In a typical embodiment, this is important for filtering away common variants at the level of 1%, i.e., eliminating all the variations from the reference genome that are expressed in more than 1% of the population. Since the polymorphism criterion is arbitrary, a genetic analysis comparing individuals in the same family can be useful for distinguishing germ line mutations from somatic mutations. In such an embodiment, the polymorphism may be a rare polymorphism but a germ line variant and not a somatic mutation. In some embodiments, where the polymorphism is expressed in a cancer and is tissue-specific, and the tissue can be completely eliminated (e.g., prostate or bone marrow in the case of a transplant) that variant can be used to eliminate the tissue completely.
Coding sequences from exome and/or transcriptome libraries from the cancer cells are compared to the exome of EBV lymphoblasts (or PHA blasts or T cell blasts or peripheral blood lymphocytes) or any other cell from the patient excluding the tumor cell from the cancer patient and in some instances from the exome from EBV lymphoblasts (or PHA blasts) from an HLA-matched bone marrow donor. Preferred mutations are those where the sequence in a coding region of a gene in the cancer is different from the same gene in normal cells or essentially wildtype cells (e.g. EBV transformed cells) from the cancer patient and, if used, from the same gene from an HLA-matched bone marrow donor. The donor can be substituted for an HLA-matched subject. The match can be at the level of 1 up to about 12 HLA alleles. Preferably, the sequence from a gene in normal cells or essentially wildtype cells (e.g. EBV transformed cells) and from a gene from an HLA-matched bone marrow donor are the same. This approach is exemplified in
Further selection of the mutations identified in coding regions of genes expressed in the cancer cells is achieved by identifying those sequences which have a particular amino acid in the cancer cell gene sequence and/or a particular amino acid at the corresponding position in the wildtype gene sequence. The amino acid at the corresponding position in the gene from the cancer cell and from the corresponding wildtype sequence can be referred to as “mutant position amino acid” and “wildtype position amino acid, respectively.
The selection of sequences based on particular mutant position amino acids and wildtype position amino acids may depend on the nature of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I or class II supertype of the cancer patient. As used herein, MHC refers to a cell surface molecule encoded by a large gene family in all vertebrates. MHC molecules mediate interactions of leukocytes, also called white blood cells (WBCs), which are immune cells, with other leukocytes or body cells and determines compatibility of donors for organ transplant as well as one's susceptibility to an autoimmune disease via crossreacting immunization. In humans, MHC may also be referred to as human leukocyte antigen (HLA).
The MHC gene family is divided into three subgroups—class I, class II, and class III. Diversity of antigen presentation, mediated by MHC classes I and II, is attained in multiple ways: 1) the MHC's genetic encoding is polygenic; 2) MHC genes are highly polymorphic and have many variants; and 3) several MHC genes are expressed from both inherited alleles.
MHC functions to display peptide fragment (epitope) of protein molecules—either of the host's own phenotype or of other biologic entities—on the cell surface for recognition by T lymphocytes (T cells). MHC class II antigens generally mediate immunization—specific immunity—to an antigen while MHC class I antigens generally mediate destruction of host cells displaying that antigen.
HLA class I molecules can be clustered into groups, designated as supertypes, representing sets of molecules that share largely overlapping peptide binding specificity. Each supertype can be described by a supermotif that reflects the broad main anchor motif recognized by molecules within the corresponding supertype.
In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, the large number of mutant sequences initially identified by NGS analysis are further selected by identifying the MHC class I or class II type of the cancer patient and then choosing one or more mutant position amino acids and/or wildtype position amino acids that are changed in the cancer cells. Thus, mutant sequences are selected by identifying an HLA supertype of the cancer patient and then selecting one or more amino acids for the HLA supertype as the mutant position amino acid and/or wildtype position amino acid using
In some embodiments, one may ignore the HLA class and/or supertype of the individual and make a further selection of the mutants based on particular mutant position amino acids and/or wildtype position amino acids. In this instance, one or more amino acids are selected from the group consisting of tyrosine, phenylalanine, leucine, isoleucine, methionine, valine and alanine. One may select from this group one, two, three, four, five or six amino acids for the selection of mutants without regard to HLA supertype. This is an important aspect of this embodiment, i.e., that some changes are more informative. One can select for mutations that replace the wildtype amino acid with the listed amino acid.
Further selection of mutant sequences from the cancer cells that may be potential T cell epitopes for recognition by T lymphocytes (e.g., cytotoxic T lymphocytes) is achieved by evaluating peptides containing the mutation sequences for their ability to bind to MHC antigens that are expressed by the cancer patient. The terms “peptide” polypeptide,” and “protein” are used interchangeably to refer to a polymer of amino acid residues. These terms also apply to amino acid polymers where all the amino acids are naturally occurring or where one or more amino acid residues is an artificial chemical analog of a corresponding naturally occurring amino acid. Amino acids can be in the L or D form as long as the binding function of the peptide is maintained.
All peptide sequences are written according to the generally accepted convention whereby the α-N-terminal amino acid residue is on the left and the α-C-terminal amino acid residue is on the right. As used herein, the term “N-terminus” refers to the free alpha-amino group of an amino acid in a peptide, and the term “C-terminus” refers to the free α-carboxylic acid terminus of an amino acid in a peptide. A peptide which is N-terminated with a group refers to a peptide bearing a group on the alpha-amino nitrogen of the N-terminal amino acid residue. An amino acid which is N-terminated with a group refers to an amino acid bearing a group on the α-amino nitrogen.
The selection of mutant sequences from the cancer cells that may be potential T cell epitopes for recognition by T lymphocytes (e.g., cytotoxic T lymphocytes) can be carried out in silico using computer-based algorithm(s) for predicting IC50 values for peptides binding to specific MHC molecules. Prediction tools that are readily available on-line e.g., the immune epitope database (IEDB) (24, 25), the NetMHC-3.0 (26), and the SYFPEITHI database (Ramensee Immunogenetics 1999) can be used to predict the peptide sequences. For the IEDB, a percentile rank is generated for each peptide using three methods (ANN, SMM_align and Sturniolo) by comparing the peptide's score against the scores of five million random 15 mers selected from the SWISSPROT database. The percentile ranks for the three methods are then used to generate the rank for a consensus method. A small numbered percentile rank indicates a high affinity T cell epitope. A ratio between the probability of being a binder versus a non-binding also is used to evaluate binding epitopes (see, e.g., US Patent Publication 2012/0070493.
T cell epitopes presented by MHC class I molecules are typically peptides between 8 and 11 amino acids in length, whereas MHC class II molecules present longer peptides, 13-17 amino acids in length. Notwithstanding, the only practical limitation on the T cell epitopes is that they are capable of binding to the MHC molecules, which may be determined empirically, if necessary. On-line T cell epitope prediction programs are extremely accurate, with peptide sequences predicted to an accuracy of 95% (26).
The selection of peptides with useful T cell epitopes may be determined by synthesizing the peptides and testing them for binding to antigen-presenting cells that express the MHC antigens (see, for example, Peters et al. June 2006. PLoS Computational Biology 2:6 e65). Prioritization of the peptides used to test specificity of the cancer specific T cell lines can be done according to their involvement with oncogenes and then by their affinity to the patients' MHC.
Predicting peptides that bind to Class II MHC antigens can be more difficult than for Class I MHC antigens. This can be addressed for class II MHC by synthesizing longer peptides (e.g. 31 mers) and selecting for binding to class II expressing cells by in vitro experiments. For example, for the ability of the peptide to induce class II restricted T cells or the ability to serve as helper epitopes and help in the induction of Class I restricted T cells. Because of their length, the Class II peptides may be more promiscuous and bind to multiple Class II alleles. Within the 31 mer, epitopes that bind to multiple Class I alleles can be found.
Peptides that are predicted or shown to bind to MHC class I or class II antigens expressed by the cells of the cancer patient can be tested to determine if they are recognized by T lymphocyte cell lines (e.g., cytotoxic T lymphocyte CTL cell lines) prepared from the cancer patient or from an HLA-matched donor. This can be determined in standard assays. For example, T cell lines (e.g., CTL lines) prepared from the patient can be tested for cytotoxicity against patient leukemic blasts (LB), PHA-induced T lymphocyte cell lines as well as skin fibroblasts (FB) using published methods (23). As mentioned above, instead of PHA, any stimulus that activates all or a part of T cells can be used. T cell lines (e.g., CTL lines) from the patient also can be tested to determine if they inhibit the growth of non-leukemic hematopoietic progenitor cells (22, table 1). Polyclonal T cell (e.g., CTLs) preparations can be enriched for CD8+ but may contain some CD4+ cells (22). Activation of T cell lines (e.g., CTL lines) can be measured by determining the level of interferon gamma (IFNγ) secretion using the ELISpot assay, or an ELISA which are readily adaptable to high throughput screening.
These methods are useful to obtain polyclonal, leukemic-specific T cell lines from the cancer patient and also provide for their enrichment or cloning. With these methods, one determines whether particular mutations selected by NGS can activate T cell lines (e.g., CTL cell lines) from the patient so as to kill the patient's cancer cells but spare normal cells (e.g. EBV lymphoblast) from the cancer patient or from an MHC matched normal donor. The peptides with mutant sequence that activate T cells (e.g., CTL) lead to the identification of mutant genes in the patient cancer cells that may be essential to maintain the leukemic phenotype (driver mutations) or lead to identification of mutations in any other genes not involved in the cancer phenotype (passenger mutations).
Peptides with mutant sequence from the cancer cells that activate the patient's (or HLA-matched individuals) T cell lines (e.g., CTL lines) specific for the cancer cells can be evaluated for their MHC restriction by using one or more of the following methods: blocking by MHC-specific antibodies, recognition of paired EBV-transformed cell lines that differ by one allele, and/or recognition of a single allele transfectant of the 0.221 cell line (EBV-transformed cell line with no Class I MHC) (22). Mutant peptides with broad MHC restriction may have application to activate cancer specific T cells (e.g., CTL) from cancer patients that have different MHC class I and class II antigens.
Mutant peptides that activate T cell lines (e.g., CTL lines) from the cancer patients or that have been selected by other methods, i.e., is predicted to bind to one of the HLA of the cancer patient can be used to induce leukemia-specific or cancer-specific T cells (e.g., CTL) in vitro from peptide-coated mononuclear cells from the patient or from an HLA-matched subject. It is desirable to directly stimulate mononuclear cells in vitro using the mutant peptides to induce T cell lines that recognize and kill tumor cells. This would avoid the need to use cancer cells to stimulate T cell induction (a very desirable feature in the case of solid tumors) and will make the T cell lines (e.g., CTL lines) available in a more rapid and less expensive manner. Effector cells generated with this method can be tested for recognition of the peptide and the leukemic or tumor cell by the ELISpot assay. One can also test the affinity of the T cells (e.g., CTL lines) by determining the number of cells necessary to kill the tumor or the amount of antigen necessary to stimulate the T cells.
Mutant peptide containing sequence that contains an epitope recognized by cancer specific T cell lines (e.g., CTL lines) derived from the patient or from an HLA-matched donor or that have been selected by other methods, i.e., is predicted to bind to one of the HLA of the cancer patient or is immunogenic to T cells from a donor, can be used in the preparation of a cancer vaccine. Such vaccine represents an immunogenic composition that can be administered to an individual with cancer in order to elicit T cells (e.g., CTL) that specifically recognize the mutant sequence expressed by cancer cells and result in cancer cell killing. The vaccine composition thus comprises mutant peptides or mutant polypeptides corresponding to tumor specific neoantigens identified by the methods described herein.
A suitable vaccine will preferably contain at least one mutant peptide sequence, and more preferably multiple mutant peptide sequences such as 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or more. The mutant peptide antigens that are used in the vaccine are chosen for their ability to bind to MHC antigens expressed by the cancer patient who is to receive the vaccine OR ADOPTIVE TRANSFER. Better, they are peptides that have been recognized T cell lines (e.g., CTL lines) specific for the tumor or can induce T cell lines (e.g., CTL lines) that are specific for the tumor.
The vaccine can comprise a mixture of different peptide sequences or a single polypeptide that comprises a number of mutant sequences, the latter also referred to as a polyprotein. The peptides or polyprotein can be prepared by peptide synthesis chemistry. For proteins that exceed about 50 amino acids in length, the cost of efficiency of peptide synthesis may require that the polypeptide or polyprotein be produced by recombinant DNA expression methods well known in the art such as expression systems in bacteria and yeast as described previously (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,116,943). In general, nucleic acid encoding the mutant peptide sequence can be cloned into an expression vector for high yield expression of the encoded product. The expression vector can be part of a plasmid, virus, or may be a nucleic acid fragment. The expression vector includes an expression cassette into which the nucleic acid encoding the mutant peptide sequence is cloned in operable association with a promoter. The expression cassette may also include other features such as an origin of replication, and/or chromosome integration elements such as retroviral LTRs, or adeno associated viral (AAV) ITRs. If secretion of the mutant peptide sequence is desired, DNA encoding a signal sequence may be placed upstream of the nucleic acid encoding the mature amino acids.
Cells suitable for replicating and for supporting expression of the mutant peptide sequences are well known in the art. Such cells may be transfected or transduced as appropriate with the particular expression vector and large quantities of vector containing cells can be grown for seeding large scale fermenters to obtain sufficient quantities of the mutant peptide sequences for clinical applications. Such cells may include prokaryotic microorganisms, such as E. coli, or various other eukaryotic cells, such as Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO), insect cells, or the like. Standard technologies are known in the art to express foreign genes in these systems.
The vaccine can also be administered in the form of a nucleic acid vector that encodes the mutant sequence and can express the sequence upon entry of the vector into appropriate cells. A variety of regulatory sequences well known to those of skill in the art are included in the vector to ensure expression of the mutant sequence in the target cells. An exemplary vector can be from a virus such as vaccinia or adenovirus Upon entry into a suitable host cell, the mutant peptide sequences are expressed from the vector and can elicit a host T cell (e.g., CTL) response.
The vector may encode a polyprotein sequence by a “minigene” approach where the sequence encoding multiple mutant peptide sequences (i.e., multiple T cell epitopes, e.g., CTL epitopes) are contained in a single open reading frame with or without linker sequence between the epitopes. Thus, these epitope-encoding DNA sequences are directly adjoined, creating a continuous polypeptide sequence. Additional vector modifications required for efficient gene expression may include the use of introns. The inclusion of mRNA stabilization sequences can also be considered for increasing minigene expression as well as immunostimulatory sequences (e.g., CpGs). CpGs also can be used as adjuvants in the compositions, vaccines, and methods described herein. An alternative to construction of a minigene is to have the different mutant epitopes under separate expression control such as under a multi-cistronic system or with entirely separate controls such as with separate promoters and the related expression elements.
In some embodiments, the vector encoding for the various mutant peptide sequences also may encode a second protein included to enhance immunogenicity. Examples of proteins or polypeptides that could beneficially enhance the immune response include cytokines (e.g., IL2, IL12, GM-CSF), cytokine-inducing molecules (e.g. LeIF) or costimulatory molecules and helper T cells (see, for example, Vitiello et al. 1995. Journal of Clinical Investigation 95, 341). Expression of these immune enhancing proteins can be achieved by full regulation, partial regulation (e.g., bicistronic expression vector) and by use of separate vectors.
The vaccine can comprise a carrier to enhance the resulting immune response to the peptide mutant sequence. A “carrier” as used herein is a molecule that increases the molecular weight of an antigen thereby rendering the antigen immunogenic. A carrier may be any suitable protein e.g., keyhole limpet hemocyanin, serum proteins such as transferrin, serum albumin, and the like, scaffolding structures such as polysaccharide or antigen-presenting cells such as dendritic cells.
The vaccine can be administered in conjunction with an adjuvant. As used herein the term “adjuvant” refers to any substance that enhances an immune response to an antigen. Thus, an adjuvant is used to modify or augment the effects of a vaccine by stimulating the immune system to respond to the vaccine more vigorously. Adjuvants can include liposomes, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), molecular cages for antigen, components of bacterial cell walls, and endocytosed nucleic acids such as double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), interleukins (e.g., IL-12) and unmethylated CpG dinucleotide-containing DNA (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 6,406,705). Adjuvants may be mixed with the vaccine or may be covalently or non-covalently linked to the mutant sequence peptides or polypeptides.
The mutant peptide vaccine (polypeptide or polypeptide expression vector) can be administered in a sufficient amount to treat a cancer patient that has cancer cells expressing the mutant peptide sequence. Mutant peptide sequences are chosen that will bind to and be presented by MHC antigens expressed by the cancer patient. The administered vaccine will generate T cells (e.g., CTL) in the patient against the cancer cells, which cells will kill the cancer cells thereby treating the patient. Alternatively, or in addition, the patient can be administered T cell lines (e.g., CTL lines) prepared from the cancer patient or from an HLA-matched donor that can specifically kill the cancer cells in the patient. These T cell lines (e.g., CTL lines) can be prepared by contacting in vitro mononuclear cells from the cancer patient or from the HLA-matched donor with the vaccine or with cancer cells from the patient.
As employed herein, the phrase “an effective amount,” refers to a dose sufficient to provide concentrations high enough to impart a beneficial effect on the recipient thereof. The specific therapeutically effective dose level for any particular subject will depend upon a variety of factors including the disorder being treated, the severity of the disorder, the activity of the specific compound, the route of administration, the rate of clearance of the compound, the duration of treatment, the drugs used in combination or coincident with the compound, the age, body weight, sex, diet, and general health of the subject, and like factors well known in the medical arts and sciences. Various general considerations taken into account in determining the “therapeutically effective amount” are known to those of skill in the art and are described, e.g., in Gilman et al., eds., Goodman And Gilman's: The Pharmacological Bases of Therapeutics, 8th ed., Pergamon Press, 1990; and Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, 17th ed., Mack Publishing Co., Easton, Pa., 1990. Dosage levels typically fall in the range of about 0.001 up to 100 mg/kg/day; with levels in the range of about 0.05 up to 10 mg/kg/day are generally applicable. A composition can be administered parenterally, such as intravascularly, intravenously, intraarterially, intramuscularly, subcutaneously, orally or the like. The composition may be administered as a bolus, or slowly infused.
A therapeutically effective dose can be estimated initially from cell culture assays by determining an IC50. A dose can then be formulated in animal models to achieve a circulating plasma concentration range that includes the IC50 as determined in cell culture. Such information can be used to more accurately determine useful initial doses in humans. Levels of the active ingredient in plasma may be measured, for example, by HPLC. The exact formulation, route of administration and dosage can be chosen by the individual physician in view of the patient's condition.
Cancer patients are treated by the methods of the invention if the patient is cured from the cancer or if the cancer is in remission. As used herein, remission is the state of absence of disease activity in patients with a chronic illness. Thus, a cancer patient in remission is cured of their cancer or the cancer is under control. Thus, cancer may be in remission when the tumor fails to enlarge or to metastasize. Complete remission is the absence of disease active with no evidence of disease as indicated by diagnostic methods, such as imaging, such as CT and PET, and sometimes by bone marrow biopsy. When a cancer patient is put into remission, this may be followed by relapse, which is the reappearance of the cancer. Cancer patients can also be treated by adoptive transfer during relapse.
The mutant (and optionally wildtype) peptide vaccine (polypeptide or polypeptide expression vector) can be contacted in vitro by T cells from the patient or from an HLA-matched donor to stimulate cancer specific T cell lines (e.g., CTL lines). The T cell lines (e.g., CTL lines) can be expanded to yield sufficient numbers of cells and then administered to the cancer patient to treat the cancer. The in vitro contacting may further include mononuclear cells that are enriched in CD8+ or the addition of autologous CD4+ T cells and/or dendritic cells from the cancer patient or from the HLA-matched donor. The CD4+ T cells can be induced by class II restricted epitope derived from the cancer cell or can be a peptide known to stimulate these t cells (for example, a tetanus toxoid derived peptide). During or after administration of the T cells (e.g., CTL), the patient may be administered the vaccine to further stimulate T cell activity against the cancer cells in the patient.
The term “CD4+ T cells” refers to lymphocytes that produce the CD4 protein and interact with dendritic cells to induce antigen presentation by or maturation of the dendritic cells. CD4+ T cells may be isolated from natural sources such as blood, cell lines grown in culture, and CD4+ T cell clones.
The term CD8+ T cell refers to lymphocytes that produce the CD8 protein. CD8+ T cells that can kill target cells are known as CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL). CD8+ T cells may be isolated from natural sources such as blood, cell lines grown in culture, and CD8+ T cell clones.
The term “selective” or “specific”, when used in reference to T cells (e.g., CD8+ CTL) means a T cell (e.g., CD8+ CTL) that preferentially recognizes and has cytotoxic activity toward a cancer cell, compared to a normal cell. A selective T cell (e.g., CTL) can distinguish, or can be made to distinguish, a target pathologically aberrant cell from a population of non-target cells, and does not substantially cross-react with non-target cells. A pathologically aberrant cell refers to a cell that is altered from the normal due to changes in physiology or phenotype associated with a disease or abnormal condition. A cancer cell is an example of a pathologically aberrant cell.
The term “ex vivo” when used in reference to a cell is intended to mean a cell outside of the body. Therefore, an ex vivo cell culture method involves harvesting cells from an individual. Ex vivo culture methods are applicable to a cell harvested from any tissue or organ of an individual.
The term “in situ” when used in reference to selective T cell (e.g., CTL) activity is intended to mean that selective T cells (e.g., CTL) can destroy a target pathologically aberrant cell in an intact structure of the body. For example, a selective T cell (e.g., CTL) can destroy a target cell in a heterogeneous population of cells. Specifically, a selective T cell (e.g., CTL) can eliminate a pathologically aberrant cell, such as a tumor cell, from a tissue, such as blood or bone marrow.
The term “sufficient time” when used in the context of inducing the generation of boosting the activity of T cells (e.g., CD8+ CTL) refers to the time for processing and presenting of an antigen by dendritic cells, recognition by T cells (e.g., CD8+ CTL) of an antigen, and activation of T cell activity (e.g., cytotoxic activity). A sufficient time that allows for the completion of this process can vary due to differences in the various cell populations of the methods will result in differences in rates of antigen uptake. Factors that can affect the sufficient time for T cell (e.g., CD8+ CTL) induction can include the types of cells in a culture, the purity of various cell types, concentrations of cell types, and whether dendritic cells are immature or are presenting antigen at the time of culture.
As used herein, term “isolated” in reference to a cell refers to when the cell is separated from one or more components with which it is associated in nature. An isolated cell also includes a cell purified from non-cellular tissue components, such as connective tissue fibers. An isolated cell can be, for example, a primary cell, either freshly purified from non-cellular tissue components, or cultured for one or more generation. An example of an isolated cell is a cell that has been separated from blood, such as a cell of a preparation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs).
The term “substantially” unless indicated otherwise means greater than 90%, more preferably greater than 95% and more preferably greater than 99%.
As used herein, term “antigen” means a molecule that can be processed and presented by an antigen-presenting cell and subsequently recognized by a T cell receptor. Such a molecule can be for example, a polypeptide or a peptide.
The term “target”, when used in reference to the immune reactivity of a T cell (e.g., CD8+ T cell) is any predetermined antigen. A predetermined antigen can be, for example, a cell or polypeptide.
As used herein, the term “naive” when used in reference to a T cell (e.g., CD8+ T cell) is intended to mean that a T cell (e.g., CD8+ T cell), has either not been exposed to a particular target cell or antigen in vivo. Therefore, a naive T cell (e.g., CD8+ T cell) is exposed to a particular target cell or antigen ex vivo in order for it to be capable of T cell activity (CTL activity) selective for the particular target cell or antigen.
As used herein the term mononuclear cell refers to a cell with a single nucleus. Mononuclear cells may be immune cells and may be obtained from any of various sites within the body such as blood, lymph, spleen, lymphnode, thymus and bone marrow.
As used herein, the term “treating” is intended to mean reduction in severity or prevention of a pathological condition mediated by a pathologically aberrant cell. Reduction in severity includes, for example, an arrest or decrease in clinical symptoms, physiological indicators, biochemical markers or metabolic indicators. Prevention of disease includes, for example, precluding the occurrence of the disease or restoring a diseased individual to their state of health prior to disease. Treatment of cancer can reflect a maintenance or reduction in tumor size, the absence of metastases or absence of additional metastases, increased disease free interval or extended survival.
As used herein, the term “effective amount” is intended to mean an amount of T cells (e.g., CD8+ CTL) required to effect a decrease in the extent, amount or rate of spread of a pathological condition when administered to an individual. The dosage of a T cell (e.g., CTL) preparation required to be therapeutically effective will depend, for example, on the pathological condition to be treated and the level of abundance and density of the target antigens as well as the weight and condition of the individual, and previous or concurrent therapies. The appropriate amount considered as an effective dose for a particular application of selective T cells (e.g., CTLs) provided by the method can be determined by those skilled in the art, using the guidance provided herein. One skilled in the art will recognize that the condition of the patient needs to be monitored throughout the course of therapy and that the amount of the composition that is administered can be adjusted according to the individual's response to therapy.
The following examples serve to illustrate the present invention. These examples are in no way intended to limit the scope of the invention.
A scheme for identifying mutations in cancer cells that can be the target for immune recognition is shown in
DNA exome libraries were prepared from the patient #1 leukemic cells, the patient #1 EBV-cell line and from the donor EBV-cell line using NGS methods conducted under contract with Expression Analysis, Inc. (Durham, N.C.). An RNA transcriptome library was prepared by Expression Analysis, Inc., using the patient leukemic cells. In addition to sequencing, the leukemic cell sample was evaluated for the expression level of known genes using the transcriptome library.
The sequencing results from each library were initially subjected to filtering using depth of coverage for reference+variant>=20×. No base alignment quality (BAQ) correction and no probabilistic modeling was used to filter out low frequency variants. Under this approach, the sequences from each cell source which differ from the reference gene sequences (human reference genome NCBI37/hg19 sequence (Genome Bioinformatics Group of the University of California Santa Cruz, available on the world wide web) resulted in an initial set of 128,161 mutations (“the 128K set”) (
The 128K mutation set was further selected using the criteria set below:
The result of these additional selections applied to the 128K set yielded a smaller set of 3,276 non-synonymous leukemic specific sequences (L-seq1). A further selection of the 3,276 set was obtained by selecting those sequences that are associated with any of a library of 73 known tumor associated genes (TAG) (see
a-b shows a second approach used to process the raw sequencing information obtained from patient #1. The initial sequences were filtered to a depth of at least 20 reads (>=20×), infrequent variants were excluded and BAQ correction was applied. Under this approach, the sequences from each cell source which differ from the reference gene sequences yielded a set of 23,947 (24K) mutants.
The 24K mutation set was further selected using the criteria set below:
The result of these additional selections applied to the 24K set yielded a smaller set of 242 non-synonymous leukemic specific sequences (L-seq2). This set was further reduced to 127 sequences by selecting only those where the level of expression (FPKM) determined from a transcriptome library was above zero (
The set of mutations from L-seq1 and Lseq2 were further selected to identify a smaller subset with prospects for binding to HLA antigens of the cancer patient. To this end, each L-seq was evaluated for mutants that involve either a gain or loss of a tyrosine. For L-seq1, there were 15 sequences with a tyrosine gain and 184 sequences with a tyrosine loss (
Peptide sequences containing the tyrosine involved mutant sequences (both gain and loss) and a corresponding wildtype peptide were transcribed (in silico) as 21 mer peptides with 10 amino acids located on each side of the tyrosine involved position. The 21 mer peptides were then evaluated for having an 8-11 aa epitope that would exhibit binding to HLA-A1 under the T cell epitope prediction program of IEDB. Peptide sequences were identified that bound below the 3.5% percentile and that showed a ratio of predicted binding greater than 3.
From L-seq1, the gain of tyrosine group showed 12/16 IEDB predicted binders and the loss of tyrosine group showed 166/184 IEDB predicted binders (
The set of L-seq2 containing 127 expressed cancer specific mutations but not involving a tyrosine change selection showed a lower number of HLA-A1 binders, with 11 acquiring HLA-A1 binding and 21 losing HLA-A1 binding (
A modified scheme for identifying mutations in cancer cells that can be the target for immune recognition was used on samples obtained from patient #2 and is shown in
DNA exome libraries were prepared from the patient leukemic cells, the patient EBV-cell line and from the donor EBV-cell line using NGS methods conducted under contract with Expression Analysis, Inc. (Durham, N.C.). An RNA transcriptome library was prepared by Expression Analysis, Inc., using the patient leukemic cells. In addition to sequencing, the leukemic cell sample was evaluated for the expression level of known genes using the transcriptome library.
The sequences obtained by the exome sequencing were aligned using BWA (version 0.5.9). with the default parameters except for the seed length (−l) to be 12 bp to aggregate as many alignments as possible. Pileups to use in further downstream processing were generated with Samtools mpilup using default parameters, variants were then called using a procedure described previously (Holbrok at al, 2011). The sequences obtained by the transcriptome sequencing were aligned using Bowtie2 and the transcript annotated using the UCSC hg19 reference genome. The RNA transcripts were quantified using RSEM (Ref.: Li, B and Dewey, C N. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. 2011, BMC Bioinformatics 12:323). An initial set of 121,719 mutations (“the 121K set”) was obtained.
As described for the patient #1 data, the 121K mutation set from patient #2 was further selected by (1) discarding all variants that arise outside of an exon, (2) select sequences where the base difference results in a non-synonymous amino acid change, and (3) select sequences where the amino acid at a particular position in a gene of the leukemic cell is different for both alleles versus that in the EBV-cell line from the patient and the donor, and where the amino acid is the same (homozygous or heterozygous) in the EBV-cell line of the patient and the donor which can be summarized as the amino acid (aa) for L (at both alleles) is different from P and D (L differs at both alleles from P=D).
The result of these additional selections applied to the 121K set yielded a smaller set of 980 non-synonymous leukemic specific sequences (“L-seq”;
All patents and publications mentioned in the specification are indicative of the levels of those of ordinary skill in the art to which the invention pertains. All patents and publications are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
The invention illustratively described herein suitably may be practiced in the absence of any element or elements, limitation or limitations which is not specifically disclosed herein. Thus, for example, in each instance herein any of the terms “comprising,” “consisting essentially of” and “consisting of” may be replaced with either of the other two terms. The terms and expressions which have been employed are used as terms of description and not of limitation, and there is no intention that in the use of such terms and expressions of excluding any equivalents of the features shown and described or portions thereof, but it is recognized that various modifications are possible within the scope of the invention claimed. Thus, it should be understood that although the present invention has been specifically disclosed by preferred embodiments and optional features, modification and variation of the concepts herein disclosed may be resorted to by those skilled in the art, and that such modifications and variations are considered to be within the scope of this invention as defined by the appended claims. Other embodiments are set forth within the following claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part (CIP) application of PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/050362, filed Jul. 12, 2013, which claims benefit of U.S. Provisional application 61/670,931, filed Jul. 12, 2012, both hereby incorporated by reference.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61670931 | Jul 2012 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | PCT/US2013/050362 | Jul 2013 | US |
| Child | 14594757 | US |
