This specification relates to combined positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) imaging systems and, more particularly, to a PET detector assembly wherein at least one PET detector is located on each side of a neutral axis of a backplane of the PET scanner.
In medical imaging, a computed tomography (CT) scanning modality can be used to provide images of the internal structures of a human body, such as the bones. In addition, a positron emission tomography (PET) scanning modality can be used to provide images of the functional aspects of the body, usually corresponding to the metabolic uptake of an internal organ or tissue. It is frequently desirable to combine the CT and PET modalities to provide a co-registered image or series of images to assist in non-invasively studying physiological processes and structures within the body.
In a CT scan, an x-ray source is passed around a patient. Detectors around the patient then respond to an x-ray transmission through the patient to produce an image of the area of study. In a PET scan, a short-lived radioisotope is injected into a patient. For example, one such radioisotope is fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). During the PET scan, the patient is positioned in a tunnel within a PET scanner gantry. The radioisotope undergoes positron emission decay and emits a positron. The positron encounters and annihilates with an electron to produce a pair of gamma rays moving in approximately opposite directions. The gamma rays are then detected by a plurality of PET detectors (a.k.a. gamma detectors) arranged around the circumference of the tunnel.
A representative layout of a combined PET/CT scanner system 500 is shown in
The spatial arrangement of the three components introduces a couple of challenges to the system design. In certain CT embodiments, the CT FOV is shifted to the patient side of the CT scanner 520, assisting in interventional therapy. This accommodation increases the separation between the CT scanner 520 and the PET scanner 510, thus increasing the FOV separation distance 550.
Another challenge arises most often in newer PET/CT scanner system designs where a common PET gantry is tasked with structurally supporting both the short and long PET FOV axial length 560 designs.
In a conventional PET detector assembly 10 used in PET/CT scanner systems shown in
In the conventional PET/CT scanner systems, the FOV separation distance 550 in a system is kept constant for design simplicity regardless of the axial length 560 of the PET FOV, for example, between a 3-ring PET detector system and a 4-ring PET detector system. This compromise was acceptable in the past because the difference in the PET FOV axial length 560 was on the order of 4-6 cm. With the advent of more modern PET/CT scanner systems, however, the trend has been toward longer PET FOV axial lengths, on the order of 16-40 cm, which requires many more cantilevered PET detector rings being mounted on the gantry backplane 14 with greater moment load W.
Therefore, there is a need for an improved PET/CT scanner system's PET detector assembly.
According to an aspect of the present disclosure, a PET detector assembly in a combined PET/CT scanner system comprises a backplane structure for supporting two or more PET detector rings; two or more PET detector rings that are mounted on the backplane, wherein the two or more PET detector rings define a PET detector field of view (FOV); and a CT scanner defining a CT FOV; where the backplane defines a neutral vertical plane; where when there are an even number of PET detector rings, half of the PET detector rings are at least partially disposed on a first side of the neutral vertical plane such that, the half of the PET detector rings are at least partially between the neutral vertical plane and the CT FOV and the remaining half of the PET detector rings are at least partially disposed on a second side of the neutral vertical plane that is opposite the first side; and where when there are an odd number Xodd of PET detector rings, the side of the neutral vertical plane that is nearer the CT FOV has n=(Xodd+1)/2 number of PET detector rings at least partially disposed on a first side of the neutral vertical plane such that, the n number of PET detector rings are at least partially between the neutral vertical plane and the CT FOV and n−1 number of PET detector rings are at least partially disposed on a second side of the neutral vertical plane that is opposite the first side.
A combined PET/CT scanner system incorporating a PET detector assembly of the present disclosure is also provided.
The features of the embodiments described herein will be more fully disclosed in the following detailed description, which is to be considered together with the accompanying drawings wherein like numbers refer to like parts. All illustrations are schematic and they are not intended to show actual dimensions or proportions.
This description of the exemplary embodiments is intended to be read in connection with the accompanying drawings, which are to be considered part of the entire written description. The drawing figures are not necessarily to scale and certain features may be shown exaggerated in scale or in somewhat schematic form in the interest of clarity and conciseness. In the description, relative terms such as “horizontal,” “vertical,” “up,” “down,” “top” and “bottom” as well as derivatives thereof (e.g., “horizontally,” “downwardly,” “upwardly,” etc.) should be construed to refer to the orientation as then described or as shown in the drawing figure under discussion. These relative terms are for convenience of description and normally are not intended to require a particular orientation. Terms including “inwardly” versus “outwardly,” “longitudinal” versus “lateral” and the like are to be interpreted relative to one another or relative to an axis of elongation, or an axis or center of rotation, as appropriate. Terms concerning attachments, coupling and the like, such as “connected” and “interconnected,” refer to a relationship wherein structures are secured or attached to one another either directly or indirectly through intervening structures, as well as both movable or rigid attachments or relationships, unless expressly described otherwise. The term “operatively connected” is such an attachment, coupling or connection that allows the pertinent structures to operate as intended by virtue of that relationship.
The present disclosure describes combined PET and CT imaging systems in which PET detectors are positioned on each side of the backplane, or supporting structure, of the PET scanner. Arranging the PET detectors in this way reduces the cantilever load on the backplane, which may allow the backplane to include less material. The more balanced arrangement of the PET detectors described herein may also allow for easier access for servicing of the PET detectors. Further, the separation of the field of view (FOV) of the PET and CT imagers may be held constant while changing the FOV of the PET imager.
Referring to
Referring to
In both embodiments of the PET detector assemblies 100 and 100A, at least one of the rings 20a, 20b, 20c, 20d of PET detectors 12 is positioned on either side of the neutral vertical plane 16 of the backplane 14. For example, in the illustrated example of
Positioning at least one ring of PET detectors 12 on each side of the backplane 14 reduces the moment load on the backplane 14 caused by the PET detectors 12. As a result, stresses on the backplane 14 are reduced, thus reducing the structural strength and/or stiffness requirement for the backplane 14. This provides additional design flexibility and material choices for fabricating the backplane 14 and also can reduce the cost of the materials. For example, the backplane 14 can be fabricated from relatively inexpensive foam or cardboard material sandwiched between sheets of aluminum, thus reducing fabrication costs.
In addition, this arrangement of the PET detectors 12 enables fabrication of a lighter backplane 14 resulting in reduced transportation and installation costs. Further, this arrangement of the PET detectors 12 reduces the risk that vibration induced damage to the PET/CT scanner system.
The PET detector assembly 100 can comprise any number of PET detector rings odd or an even number. For example, the PET detector assembly 100 can include three PET detector rings 20a, 20b, 20c (as shown in
In applications in which the PET detector assembly 100A includes an even number of PET detector rings, same number of PET detector rings can be positioned on either side of the neutral vertical plane 16 defined by the backplane 14. For example, as shown in
Thus, according to the present disclosure, to reduce the moment load on the backplane 14 caused by the PET detectors 12, the PET detector assembly is to be designed so that (1) when the total number of PET detector rings in the PET/CT scanner system is an even number, equal number of PET detector rings are on either side of the neutral vertical plane 16 of the backplane 14, and (2) when the total number of PET detector rings in the PET/CT scanner system is an odd number, the side of the neutral vertical plane 16 that is nearer the CT scanner has n number of PET detector rings and the opposite side of the neutral vertical plane 16 (i.e., the side farther from the CT scanner) has n−1 number of PET detector rings where n+(n−1)=the total number of PET detector rings. Thus, if the total number of PET detector rings in the PET/CT scanner system is an even number Xeven, the PET detector assembly would comprise Xeven/2 number of PET detector rings on either side of the neutral vertical plane 16 of the gantry backplane 14. If the total number of PET detector rings in the PET/CT scanner system is an odd number Xodd, the PET detector assembly would comprise n=(Xodd+1)/2 number of PET detector rings on the side of the neutral vertical plane 16 and n−1 number of PET detector rings on the opposite side of the neutral vertical plane 16. Thus, one side of the neutral vertical plane 16 will have one more PET detector ring than the other side. It does not matter, however, which side (i.e., the side farther from the CT scanner or the side closer to the CT scanner) ends up with one more PET detector ring.
An advantage of the PET detector assembly 100, 100A disclosed herein is that the distance from the CT FOV to the nearest PET detector ring's FOV (the axial FOV separation distance 550 between PET and CT) is the same for an assembly with three PET detector rings (shown in
Table 1 provides exemplary arrangements for rings of PET detectors according to embodiments described herein. Table 1 shows exemplary arrangements for a PET/CT scanner system having a co-scan length of 200 cm. Given that co-scan range, the maximum FOV separation between the PET scanner and the CT scanner is provided for a given number of rings of detectors. As shown in Table 1, in order to maintain the desired co-scan range, the maximum allowed FOV separation is reduced as more rings of PET detectors are added to the PET scanner. This is because the axial FOV of the PET scanner increases with the addition of each ring of detectors.
The PET detector assembly 100, 100A disclosed herein provides a balanced PET scanner gantry where the PET detectors span a gantry support backplane, represents the most efficient use of the space in the gantry, yielding the most compact design, and the axial length of the detectors alone drive the overall gantry width. Some of the benefits of the PET detector assembly of the present disclosure are: a balanced PET system for the range of the axial PET FOV lengths; achieving the required co-scan range without changing the patient bed and without adding system footprint; reduction in weight and cost of a balanced over a cantilevered gantry, as there is little to no moment to support; and ease of service access to the PET detectors without opening the gantry. To service the PET detectors, the gantry cover needs to be removed to access the PET detectors. However, in the PET/CT scanner system of the present disclosure, the PET detector assembly 100, 100A and the CT scanner 520 do not need to be separated to access the PET detectors.
In various embodiments, the PET detectors 12 can be of the type known as time-of-flight (TOF) detectors. A TOF detector has enhanced sensitivity due to the better positioning (through better electronic timing) of events along a line of coincidence. Alternatively, non-TOF types of detectors may be used. Further, the PET detectors 12 may include photo sensors such as photomultiplier tubes (PMTs), avalanche photo diodes (APDs) and/or silicon photo multipliers (SiPMs). It should be understood that these are only some examples of PET detectors and that other types of detectors may be used.
It will be understood that the foregoing description is of exemplary embodiments of this invention, and that the invention is not limited to the specific forms shown. Modifications may be made in the design and arrangement of the elements without departing from the scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5391877 | Marks | Feb 1995 | A |
6205347 | Morgan | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6303935 | Engdahl | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6490476 | Townsend | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6700949 | Susami | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6810103 | Tybinkowski | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6831961 | Tybinkowski | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6878941 | Balan | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6920196 | Ueno | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6965661 | Kojima | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7154096 | Amano | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7297958 | Kojima | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7374337 | Yunker | May 2008 | B2 |
7412027 | Yakubovsky | Aug 2008 | B2 |
8260013 | Pekar | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8344326 | Amano | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8581196 | Yamaya | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8594404 | Yamaya | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8630696 | Kim | Jan 2014 | B2 |
9014330 | Takayama | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9029787 | Yamaya | May 2015 | B2 |
9121893 | Schmand | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9316743 | Rousso | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9606199 | Breuer | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9880236 | Obata | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9947116 | Matthews | Apr 2018 | B2 |
10036790 | Schmand | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10413267 | Gagnon | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10912528 | Corbeil | Feb 2021 | B2 |
20020090050 | Nutt | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030012331 | Kojima | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030058984 | Susami | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030076925 | DeSilets | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030118155 | Ueno | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030179853 | Amemiya | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040097800 | Crosetto | May 2004 | A1 |
20050067577 | Yanagita et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050067578 | Veno et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050109943 | Vaquero | May 2005 | A1 |
20070080295 | Hamill | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070102641 | Schmand | May 2007 | A1 |
20080146914 | Polzin | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090108206 | Breuer | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090154647 | Matsuzawa | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090159804 | Shibuya | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090226066 | Williams | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090264753 | von Schulthess | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100040197 | Maniawski | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100046821 | Manjeshwar | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100128956 | Yamaya | May 2010 | A1 |
20100183213 | Keppel | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110077511 | Kim | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110288407 | Brinks | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120046544 | Inoue | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120112078 | Millett | May 2012 | A1 |
20120161014 | Yamaya | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130322717 | Bar-Shalev | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140249408 | Collins | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140334702 | El Fakhri | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150073272 | Corbeil | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150369890 | Schmand | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160183890 | Nathan | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160183893 | Zhang | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160209514 | Moskal | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20170311919 | Gagnon | Nov 2017 | A1 |