One of the main attributes of chew type products is a toughness and flexibility to the point where it takes the dog a long time to consume the product. A great majority of the chew style products include rawhide. While rawhide is used as a base material, it has limited acceptability because it does not maintain a dog's interest. Manufacturers have attempted to solve this problem of reduced acceptability by incorporating numerous ingredients and processing techniques into the manufacture of rawhide-based chews for dogs, such as incorporating meat in the middle of a rawhide stick.
Despite this, the basic problem remains. As ingredients or processing techniques are utilized with rawhide to increase palatability, they typically weaken the basic structure of the rawhide and produce a less acceptable product from the standpoint of extended chew time. Further, the rawhide stick does not provide a visually appealing treat for dog. The pet treat also does not give the pet owner a visually acceptable reaction when purchasing the pet treat. What is needed is a pet treat that provides a visually appealing product that stimulates a human to purchase the pet treat. What is needed is a pet treat that provides a palatable product for a pet and can provide an initial taste reward, but also gives the dog a chew portion for sustained pet treat duration.
The prior art demonstrates utilizing rawhide in dog chews, Fisher (U.S. Pat. No. 2,988,045) demonstrated the basic techniques of how rawhide can be separated at the tannery and split into layers that can be formed into shapes followed by dehydration to produce a shelf-stable rawhide chew for dogs. A wide range of patents for rawhide chew style products followed, teaching various forms, shapes and methods for utilizing a basic rawhide fraction as a dog chew. This included Lehn (U.S. Pat. No. 4,702,929) which teaches a method for extruding rawhide byproduct fraction, called spetches, with starch to form a dog chew in stick form. Spanier (U.S. Pat. No. 5,047,231) teaches a method of soaking an inorganic pyrophosphate salt into rawhide to form a chew capable of reducing tartar accumulation on the dog's teeth. Perlberg (U.S. Pat. No. 6,223,693) demonstrates a method of soaking rawhide in a humectant and soft edible binder to produce a flexible edible chew. Twain (U.S. Pat. No. 6,425,348) taught a method for producing a chewable pet shelter from rawhide which incorporated chemical flavoring which would appeal to the pet.
Kirch (U.S. Pat. No. 6,840,196) demonstrates a pet chew produced by folding a first sheet of rawhide around a second sheet of rawhide. The second sheet is impregnated with a flavoring and protrudes from under the first sheet of rawhide. This system served to increase the palatability of the chew while at the same time reduced the incident of rug staining which can be a problem when the flavoring is present on the surface of the product.
Hingst (U.S. Pat. No. 6,895,900) disclosed a combination rawhide and pigskin product where sheets of rawhide and pigskin are sandwiched or intertwined together to form a treat with improved flavor. Jia (U.S. Pat. No. 6,935,275) teaches a method for producing a dog treat by rolling a precut and flavored rawhide piece into a cylinder with strips of hide extending from the outer ends of the cylinder.
Hague (U.S. Pat. No. 6,886,497) disclosed a product and method for infusing a rawhide or pigskin with a mint, or chlorophyll, flavoring and applying perforations to the hide so that a dog's teeth would penetrate into the product to assist in the cleaning of the dog's teeth.
Some of the most commercially successful products utilizing rawhide as dog treats have taken the approach of incorporating a meat fraction in conjunction with the rawhide to significantly increase the palatability of the chew. Sherrill (U.S. Pat. No. 5,673,653) disclosed a product and process of wrapping jerky sheets on the inside of a roll of rawhide. The jerky fraction protruded from the ends and the horizontal seam of the outside layer so that the dog could quickly be subjected to the flavor of the dehydrated meat fraction. This product is commercially known as a “Dingo” treat. Only a small portion of meat fraction however is initially available to the dog and the manufacturing method of rolling rawhide within sheets of jerky significantly reduce the quantity of meat that can be incorporated on a dry weight basis.
Greenburg (U.S. Pat. No. 5,635,237) teaches a method of melting rawhide scraps inside of a twin-screw extruder and producing ropes that can be cut and tied to produce a formulated knotted rawhide bone. While small quantities of meat or flavoring can be incorporated with this method, the necessity to feed the extruder at a reduced moisture level limits the amount of meat fraction that can be included.
Andersen (U.S. Pat. No. 6,277,420) demonstrates a method of making a preformed rawhide tube and depositing a shelf-stable liquid meaty filling into the cavity of the tube which gels and then forms a solid matrix on the inside of the rawhide. While this system incorporates large ratios of meaty filling fraction to rawhide, the chew time is somewhat reduced by the high moisture present in the system.
Brown (U.S. Pat. No. 6,886,496) has attempted to solve this problem by producing a pre-extruded dried meaty log that could be placed inside of a rolled rawhide cylinder. While this would result in a somewhat extended chew time over many of the earlier treats, a limited fraction of meat is available on the surface of the final chew to maintain a dog's interest for an extended period of time. Further, the initial meat reward may not be sufficient to entice the dog to finish the treat leaving a remnant of the treat behind.
Yet there is nothing in the prior art that provides a dry outer meat portion for initial flavor enhancement, with a rawhide chew for a subsequent dog chew that is appealing to a pet. The pet treat being sized to provide an intermediary pet treat that is more substantial than a “reward treat,” (i.e. dog biscuit) but will take less time to consume when compared to a classic rawhide bone.
A composition and process for making pet food treats is described herein. Animal meant and auxiliary ingredients are combined to form a meat mixture. The meat mixture is formed into portions. The portions of meat mixture are positioned on a chew stick that comprises rawhide. The pet treat gives the appearance of a grilled shish kabob, where the meat portions are meant for initial taste and the chew stick will provide the dog with a longer-lasting chewing portion.
The method of making a pet treat is described herein.
In one embodiment of the invention, chicken meat is used as a meat base. Chicken meat can include, for example, necks, breasts, or backs, or any combination of two or more thereof, with or without cartilage and/or bone ground to small sizes (i.e., emulsified). Chicken meat can also include necks, breasts, or backs, or any combination of two or more thereof that are boneless and ground to desired sizes. Chicken meat can include mechanically separated chicken (MSC). Chicken meat can also include a mixture of boneless or bone-in chicken, mixed together in various portions. The chicken meat is used in an amount of about 6-35% by weight of the meat mixture. It should be appreciated that the other animal sources, including various sections of the animal can be used to provide a final taste or consistency for the meat. In embodiments where other meat sources are used, the total meat content is 6% to 35% by weight of the meat mixture.
The process of forming a chew stick includes, but is not limited to the use of rawhide, or other similar materials to form an elongated section. It should be appreciated that the chew stick, as described herein may be made from several processes available to one skilled in the art; for example, extrusion, molding and the like are within the scope of the invention. In one example embodiment, the chew stick is prepared by shaping a piece of rawhide to form an elongated chew. As shown in
The second sheet is placed upon the first sheet in the same general orientation, the two rawhide sheets are twisted together, as described, to make a multi-component chew stick. Once the rawhide sheets are twisted together, they are dried. In one example embodiment the chew stick is dried in an oven at 40 degrees Celsius to 65 degrees Celsius for 4 to 5 hours. Upon removing the dried chew stick from the oven, the sticks are allowed to cool to allow for ease in handling.
In some example embodiments, at least one rawhide section is soaked in a potassium sorbate solution prior to forming said chew stick. One skilled in the art can readily ascertain the precise concentration needed to provide sufficient anti-mold activity. For example, one concentration includes a concentration of potassium sorbate at 0.5% v/v. The chew stick can be formed in a variety of ways. In order to achieve a dual component appearance, one rawhide piece may be twisted where a portion of chew stick is colored to provide the appearance of a multi-layered chew stick. Referring again to
The frozen containers (i.e. bags) of meat base are thawed and the meat base is placed in a tumbler to begin the process of forming a meat mixture. Once the meat base begins the tumbling process, the meat base is combined with auxiliary ingredients forming a meat mixture. The meat base can be used in an amount between about 30% and about 90% by weight of the meat mixture, for example about 60% by weight of the meat mixture. In some example embodiments, the meat base and auxiliary ingredients can optionally be subjected to a vacuum to form a homogeneous meat mixture. The vacuum can remove entrapped air and can provide a more dense and homogeneous blend. The vacuum can be applied at a level from about 0 to about 30 mm/Hg.
The meat mixture is prepared by mixing the meat base with auxiliary ingredients that may include a binding agent, a salt, a sugar, an acid, a mold inhibitor, a flavoring compound, an aroma compound, a coloring compound, a moisturizing compound or any combination of two or more thereof.
The binding agent can be used in an amount between about 10% and about 75% by weight of the meat mixture. In one example embodiment the binding agent is about 20% by weight of the meat mixture. The type and amount of binding agent can be selected so that the resulting product is not sticky and no residue is left on the pet owners' finger-tips or household's surfaces, such as carpets. For example, the binding agent can be added to “buffer” or to absorb fat content in the meat mixture. The binding agent can also facilitate the blending of the various ingredients and allow the meat mixture to hold a shape prior to being dried.
The binding agent can include, but is not limited to, oat flour, soy flour, wheat flour, rice flour, potato flour, corn flour, rye flour, buckwheat flour, chestnut flour, chickpea flour, atta flour, pea flour, bean flour, amaranth flour, arrowroot flour, taro flour, cattail flour, acorn flour, sorghum flour, or tapioca flour, or a combination of two or more thereof. The flour, in this case wheat flour, is incorporated in amount of no more than 25% by weight of the meat mixture.
The aroma compound or flavoring compound, provide palatability enhancement respectively and include, but are not limited to, garlic (e.g., garlic concentrate, garlic oil, garlic powder, garlic aroma), onion (e.g., onion concentrate, onion oil, onion powder, onion aroma), natural smoke flavor, hickory, mesquite, anchovy, chicken, lobster, tikka, tandoori, parsley, spinach, saffron, digestive (liquid stomach contents of an animal, e.g., chicken), phosphate, yeast, or enzymatic liver (pork, turkey or chicken), or any derivative thereof, or any combination of two or more thereof. Additionally salt may be added to enhance flavor and can also provide particle binding in forming meat mixture.
The aroma compound or flavoring compound can be used in an amount between about 0% and about 5% by weight of the meat mixture, for example less than about 1% by weight of the meat mixture. The coloring compound can be used in an amount between about 0% and about 4% by weight of the meat mixture, for example less than about 1% by weight of the meat mixture. Flavoring compounds can be used in an amount between about 0% and about 0.5% by weight of the meat mixture, for example about 0.25% by weight of the meat mixture.
Coloring compounds provide cosmetic enhancement respectively and include, but are not limited to, caramel coloring, malliouse, allura red AC, annatto, astaxanthin, betanin or beetroot red, blue 2, brilliant black BN, brilliant blue FCF, brown FK, canthaxanthin, carmine, carotene, Color Blue, curcumin, erythrosine, orange number 1, iron oxide, orange B, ponceau 6R, red 40, red 2G, saffron, sunset yellow FCF, tartrazine, titanium dioxide, turmeric, yellow 5, yellow 2, or any combination of two or more thereof.
The humectant can be used to reduce water activity. Water activity is a measure of the availability of water in a food for microbial growth such as molds. Water activity is a primary method of controlling antimicrobial or mold growth. One example range of water activity is an aW value of less than 0.7. The humectant including sugar, or sugar alcohols can be used in an amount between about 0% and about 20% by weight of the meat mixture, for example about 15% to 18% by weight of the meat mixture. The humectant, can include, but is not limited to fructose, dextrose, maltodextrin, honey, high-fructose corn syrup, maltose, brown sugar, coconut sugar, date sugar, sucanat, molasses, turbinado sugar, dextrin, glucose, sucrose, sucralose, glycerin or any derivative thereof, or any combination of two or more thereof.
The meat mixture may also include a mold inhibitor. A non-exclusive list of mold inhibitors include, but is not limited to, potassium sorbate, cultured whey, calcium propionate, cultured dextrose, cultured yeast, benzoic acid, acetic acid, or plum powder, or any derivative thereof or any combination of two or more thereof.
A moisturizing compound can be used in a range of between 2% and 20%. For example, a moisturizing compound, such as water, will aid in formation of the meat mixture. For example, the moisture content of the meat mixture may be above 20% prior to drying the pet treat, but will achieve a moisture content below 20%, for example 18%, in the final pet treat product.
It should be appreciated that each of these ingredients other than the meat base is optional, such as the ingredients with a percentage range starting at 0%. Table 1 and 2 describe example formulations for pet treat.
After mixing the meat base with the auxiliary ingredients and optionally subjecting it to a vacuum in the tumbling device, the temperature of the mixture can be checked. If the temperature is too high the mixture can be cooled, by techniques such as the addition of CO2. Conversely, if the temperature is too low additional heat is applied to facilitate the formation of the meat mixture.
Referring now to
In one embodiment, the portion of meat mixture may vary although portions between 0.25 inches and 1.5 inches are typical. The portions will typically range in weight, but will be between 0.25 and 4 oz. Furthermore, although the portions are generally made cylindrical in shape, the portions can be made with other shapes and conformations. For example, the geometrical shape of the base of the cylinder can be selected as desired, such as made round or flat. In addition, the portions can be shaped so as to form, generally round-shaped meat pieces (generally referred to as meatballs), cubic-shaped meat pieces, cylindrical-shaped meat pieces (for example, meat pieces resembling sausages), polygonal-shaped meat pieces, pyramid-shaped meat pieces, heart-shaped meat pieces, flat-wafer-shaped, or other more complex-shaped meat pieces.
Referring now to
The meat pieces can then be transferred via conveyor or manual transportation to a drying oven. The drying step is in an oven at about 40 degrees Celsius to about 60 degrees Celsius. In some example embodiments the drying time is at least 5 hours. In related embodiments, the drying time is between 5 to 7 hours. Additionally the pet treat may further be baked. The optional baking step is at a temperature of at least 80 degrees Celsius for at least 30 minutes.
Once the baking step is finished the pet treats are removed from the oven and allowed to cool. Cold air or any other cold gas is forced on the surface which transports the pet treats from the oven to packaging. Air or gas that is warmed by contact with the pet treats is re-circulated and passed through refrigerated plates to cool the air/gas and then the air/gas is blown again over the pet treat. This process can be repeated numerous times until the pet treats are cooled to a desired temperature.
Referring now to
In one embodiment, air in the bags is displaced (either drawn via a vacuum or pushed with an inert gas or gas blend) so as to reduce the level of oxygen in the bags. Then the bags are filled with the pet treats and the bags are purged in an atmosphere filled with nitrogen or an inert gas such as argon, or a combination of these gases. In another embodiment, the bags are filled with the portions of pet treats in a modified atmosphere containing nitrogen, inert gas (e.g., argon), carbon dioxide, or carbon monoxide, or any combination of two or more these gases. Any of these gasses can comprise about 0% to about 100% by weight of the gas composition. In one embodiment, the bags of pet treats comprise an atmosphere that includes nitrogen gas, carbon dioxide, and carbon monoxide. The purpose of the gas introduction is to reduce the amount of oxygen in the bag.
In general, typical meat or meat-based products include cooked meat with meat juice or fat may not be desirable by the pet owner or consumer. Alternatively, the pet treats described herein offer a more suitable handling. In one example embodiment, the resulting pet treat is made such that it does not leave sticky or oily residue on the fingers of the pet owner or consumer who handles the pet treat. To state another way, the pet treat leaves a minimum amount of residue on the fingers of the consumer. Moreover, the plurality of meat portions allows for a pet treat that has increased palatability and good ingredients.
For example, the addition of flour (e.g., wheat flour) can help soak up the fat content in the meat mixture, hence substantially reducing the potential of having a sticky residue when handling the pet treats. In addition, special blending techniques (e.g., vacuum blending as described in the above paragraphs) and other processes or techniques, maximize blending and reduce the occurrence of large chunks of meat in the meat mixture. The use of a dry oven with reduced humidity, as described in the above paragraphs, can produce pet treats with a substantially dry outer surface. This outer surface can form an outer dry surface to minimize the moisture from the one or more portions from bleeding out. Further, because the one or more portions are dried and the flavoring is found homogeneously mixed the likelihood of transferring any dye or flavoring to a decorative surface is reduced because the dye or flavoring is less prone to contacting the decorative surface and is less prone to rub off if it does contact the decorative surface.
As shown in
The one or more portions 20 are attached to the outside surface of the chew stick 30. If should be appreciated that the number of portions 20 placed along a chew stick will be related to consumer desire and commercial viability. However, the length of the chew stick, size of the one or more portions and proximity of the one or more portions to one another are all factors in determining the number of portions on the pet treat 10. As best shown in
Referring now to
While various embodiments of the present invention have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example, and not limitation. It will be apparent to persons skilled in the relevant art(s) that various changes in form and detail can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. In fact, after reading the above description, it will be apparent to one skilled in the relevant art(s) how to implement the invention in alternative embodiments. Thus, the present invention should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments. Accordingly, all suitable modifications and equivalents should be considered as falling within the spirit and scope of the invention.
The above specification, examples and data provide a complete description of the manufacture and use of the composition of the invention. Since many embodiments of the invention can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, the invention resides in the claims hereinafter appended.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/981,162, filed Dec. 28, 2015, and issued Nov. 24, 2020, as U.S. Pat. No. 10,842,170, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1149170 | Allis | Aug 1915 | A |
1498800 | Lewis | Jun 1924 | A |
2185547 | Fowler | Jan 1940 | A |
2469589 | Barricini | May 1949 | A |
2988045 | Fisher | Jun 1961 | A |
4902519 | Ream et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
5635237 | Greenberg et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
D391735 | Baker | Mar 1998 | S |
D392435 | Mocking et al. | Mar 1998 | S |
5773070 | Kazemzadeh | Jun 1998 | A |
D408948 | Huettner et al. | Apr 1999 | S |
5897893 | Mohilef | Apr 1999 | A |
D415803 | Cousins | Oct 1999 | S |
6042873 | Lawson | Mar 2000 | A |
6054159 | Manzone | Apr 2000 | A |
6060100 | Koller | May 2000 | A |
D427391 | Gill | Jun 2000 | S |
6113956 | Bower | Sep 2000 | A |
6159508 | Wolf et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
D435713 | Speck | Jan 2001 | S |
D435955 | Speck | Jan 2001 | S |
6228402 | Wolf et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6277420 | Andersen et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
D485046 | Hague | Jan 2004 | S |
D489161 | Hague | May 2004 | S |
D497457 | Willinger | Oct 2004 | S |
6827041 | Hague et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
D503507 | Jia et al. | Apr 2005 | S |
D505533 | Jia et al. | May 2005 | S |
D508762 | Jia et al. | Aug 2005 | S |
D525397 | Wang | Jul 2006 | S |
D527164 | Speck et al. | Aug 2006 | S |
D530484 | Ahmed et al. | Oct 2006 | S |
D534331 | Axelrod | Jan 2007 | S |
D544176 | Rubin | Jun 2007 | S |
D551426 | Ahmed et al. | Sep 2007 | S |
D569077 | Axelrod | May 2008 | S |
7485330 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
D594182 | Hague | Jun 2009 | S |
D626706 | Ragonetti | Nov 2010 | S |
D639967 | Bredemeier et al. | Jun 2011 | S |
D644333 | Bredemeier et al. | Aug 2011 | S |
D645640 | Mingyun et al. | Sep 2011 | S |
D648594 | Bray | Nov 2011 | S |
D651771 | Shanghui | Jan 2012 | S |
D661458 | Mingyun et al. | Jun 2012 | S |
8257775 | Axelrod et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
D672099 | Simms et al. | Dec 2012 | S |
D683516 | Elias | Jun 2013 | S |
D684746 | Pang et al. | Jun 2013 | S |
8491950 | Grammer et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8496985 | Langford | Jul 2013 | B2 |
D692627 | Yerton et al. | Oct 2013 | S |
D696836 | Chen | Jan 2014 | S |
D706943 | Bredemeier et al. | Jun 2014 | S |
8747934 | Meskendahl et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
D708417 | Allen | Jul 2014 | S |
D708418 | Allen | Jul 2014 | S |
D708818 | Axelrod et al. | Jul 2014 | S |
D726991 | Albuja | Apr 2015 | S |
D752841 | Neely et al. | Apr 2016 | S |
D759341 | Templeman et al. | Jun 2016 | S |
D762042 | Osenga | Jul 2016 | S |
20040005392 | Filipi et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040028783 | Fullwood et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040126462 | Tepper et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040219260 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050033157 | Klein et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050069609 | Straus et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20070218171 | Mehrle et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070264415 | Axelrod et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080014311 | Tepper et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080145485 | Tepper et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080175962 | Grammer et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080193607 | Tepper et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090004338 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20100062111 | Langford | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100303970 | Grammer et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100304002 | Grammer et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20120237648 | Ortiz | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130029011 | Carrillo et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130295235 | Albuja et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130309359 | Langford | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140186276 | Mahe | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140261231 | Dunton | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140335223 | Grammer et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150090192 | Powers et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20160029667 | Smittle et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160143320 | Mahe et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210037233 A1 | Feb 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14981162 | Dec 2015 | US |
Child | 17072635 | US |