Pet treat

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 12102102
  • Patent Number
    12,102,102
  • Date Filed
    Friday, July 28, 2023
    a year ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 1, 2024
    2 months ago
  • Inventors
    • Kreamer; Marc (Delray Beach, FL, US)
  • Original Assignees
  • Examiners
    • Watts; Jenna A
    Agents
    • Merchant & Gould P.C.
Abstract
A composition and process for making pet food treats is described herein. Auxiliary ingredients are combined to form a meat mixture. The meat mixture is formed into portions. The portions of meat mixture are positioned on a chew stick that comprises rawhide. The pet treat gives the appearance of a grilled shish kabob, where the meat portions are meant for initial taste, while the chew stick will provide the dog with a longer-lasting chewing portion.
Description
SUMMARY

A composition and process for making pet food treats is described herein. Animal meant and auxiliary ingredients are combined to form a meat mixture. The meat mixture is formed into portions. The portions of meat mixture are positioned on a chew stick that comprises rawhide. The pet treat gives the appearance of a grilled shish kabob, where the meat portions are meant for initial taste and the chew stick will provide the dog with a longer-lasting chewing portion.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 illustrates one embodiment of a process of making a meat mixture.



FIG. 2 illustrates one embodiment of a process of making a chew stick.



FIG. 3 illustrates one embodiment of a process of making a pet chew.



FIG. 4 illustrates one embodiment of a process of drying a pet treat.



FIG. 5 illustrates one embodiment of a process of inspecting a pet treat prior to shipment.



FIG. 6 illustrates one embodiment of a pet treat manufacturing process.



FIG. 7 is a perspective view of a pet treat.



FIG. 8 is an end elevation view of a pet treat.



FIG. 9 is a side elevation view of a pet treat.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The method of making a pet treat is described herein. FIGS. 1-6 illustrate schematic depictions of particular aspects of the methods of making a pet treat. The method comprises forming a meat mixture into portions and positioning a one or more portions on a chew stick, and drying the pet treat. As shown in FIG. 1, the meat base is made from animal meat and may comprise boneless chicken, duck, chicken liver and combinations thereof. The animal meat may be fresh, dehydrated, powdered, and extract or frozen. The frozen animal meat is defrosted at about 0 degrees Celsius to about 5 degrees Celsius. Once the animal meat is defrosted, the animal meat is weighed. Once the predetermined amount of animal meat is weighed, the meat is placed in a grinder, the animal meat(s) is ground and mixed with the specific desired ratio of animal meat(s) and stored in a container as a meat base. It should be noted that the meat base may be frozen for later use, or may be used immediately after the meat base is prepared. Further, one should appreciated that although boneless chicken, duck and chicken liver are noted in FIG. 1, the meat base can also include beef, pork, lamb, goat, horse, buffalo, venison, elk, moose, chicken, turkey, fish, or any other seafood, or any combination of two or more thereof. Alternatively, the meat base need not include boneless chicken, duck and/or chicken liver and may comprise beef, pork, lamb, goat, horse, buffalo, venison, elk, moose, bone-in chicken, turkey, fish, or any other seafood, or any combination of two or more thereof. The term “meat” associated with “meat base” and “meat mixture” are intended to encompass portions of animals, mammal and non-mammal, that can be used for a pet treat. This includes but is not limited to soft tissue, internal organs, cartilage and bone.


In one embodiment of the invention, chicken meat is used as a meat base. Chicken meat can include, for example, necks, breasts, or backs, or any combination of two or more thereof, with or without cartilage and/or bone ground to small sizes (i.e., emulsified). Chicken meat can also include necks, breasts, or backs, or any combination of two or more thereof that are boneless and ground to desired sizes. Chicken meat can include mechanically separated chicken (MSC). Chicken meat can also include a mixture of boneless or bone-in chicken, mixed together in various portions. The chicken meat is used in an amount of about 6-35% by weight of the meat mixture. It should be appreciated that the other animal sources, including various sections of the animal can be used to provide a final taste or consistency for the meat. In embodiments where other meat sources are used, the total meat content is 6% to 35% by weight of the meat mixture.


The process of forming a chew stick includes, but is not limited to the use of rawhide, or other similar materials to form an elongated section. It should be appreciated that the chew stick, as described herein may be made from several processes available to one skilled in the art; for example, extrusion, molding and the like are within the scope of the invention. In one example embodiment, the chew stick is prepared by shaping a piece of rawhide to form an elongated chew. As shown in FIG. 2, chew stick (illustrated in FIG. 7) is manufactured by taking a rawhide sheet and twisting the sheet to form an elongated stick-shape chew. As described in FIG. 2, a first rawhide sheet is cut to an appropriate size and a second sheet of rawhide is also cut in the shape of a similarly sized proportion. As shown, the first sheet and second sheet may be rawhide from different animals. In at least this example embodiment, the second sheet is a pork rawhide. Each rawhide sheet is soaked in a potassium sorbate solution. As shown, the potassium sorbate solution is (0.5%). Moreover, the second sheet has color agents added to enhance the overall appearance of the sheet. In this manner, the second sheet will provide a darker meat-like color to provide an additional visual enhancement for the overall pet treat. Still referring to FIG. 2, second rawhide sheet is colored with Color Blue, Red 40 and Yellow. It is important to note that the concentrations listed are representative of concentrations that can be utilized. However one of ordinary skill in the art would readily appreciate that the physical characteristics and animal origin of the rawhide may require modifications in the combinations and concentrations of each coloring agents to achieve a desired chew stick appearance. The sheets of rawhide may also be flavored according to one of the processes described herein.


The second sheet is placed upon the first sheet in the same general orientation, the two rawhide sheets are twisted together, as described, to make a multi-component chew stick. Once the rawhide sheets are twisted together, they are dried. In one example embodiment the chew stick is dried in an oven at 40 degrees Celsius to 65 degrees Celsius for 4 to 5 hours. Upon removing the dried chew stick from the oven, the sticks are allowed to cool to allow for ease in handling.


In some example embodiments, at least one rawhide section is soaked in a potassium sorbate solution prior to forming said chew stick. One skilled in the art can readily ascertain the precise concentration needed to provide sufficient anti-mold activity. For example, one concentration includes a concentration of potassium sorbate at 0.5% v/v. The chew stick can be formed in a variety of ways. In order to achieve a dual component appearance, one rawhide piece may be twisted where a portion of chew stick is colored to provide the appearance of a multi-layered chew stick. Referring again to FIG. 2, two rawhide pieces can be used. In some related embodiments, the at least two rawhide pieces are from different animal sources.



FIG. 3 describes one example method of receiving, storing and processing meat base to form a meat mixture. To that end, meat base can be stored at sub-zero temperatures, although fresh meat base is also within the scope of the invention. The frozen meat base is ready for further processing by thawing the meat base. In some example embodiments, meat base is thawed using a microwave. Alternatively, the meat base can be thawed by other devices known by one of ordinary skill in the art. One such alternative device is a tempering device.


The frozen containers (i.e. bags) of meat base are thawed and the meat base is placed in a tumbler to begin the process of forming a meat mixture. Once the meat base begins the tumbling process, the meat base is combined with auxiliary ingredients forming a meat mixture. The meat base can be used in an amount between about 30% and about 90% by weight of the meat mixture, for example about 60% by weight of the meat mixture. In some example embodiments, the meat base and auxiliary ingredients can optionally be subjected to a vacuum to form a homogeneous meat mixture. The vacuum can remove entrapped air and can provide a more dense and homogenous blend. The vacuum can be applied at a level from about 0 to about 30 mm/Hg.


The meat mixture is prepared by mixing the meat base with auxiliary ingredients that may include a binding agent, a salt, a sugar, an acid, a mold inhibitor, a flavoring compound, an aroma compound, a coloring compound, a moisturizing compound or any combination of two or more thereof.


The binding agent can be used in an amount between about 10% and about 75% by weight of the meat mixture. In one example embodiment the binding agent is about 20% by weight of the meat mixture. The type and amount of binding agent can be selected so that the resulting product is not sticky and no residue is left on the pet owners' finger-tips or household's surfaces, such as carpets. For example, the binding agent can be added to “buffer” or to absorb fat content in the meat mixture. The binding agent can also facilitate the blending of the various ingredients and allow the meat mixture to hold a shape prior to being dried.


The binding agent can include, but is not limited to, oat flour, soy flour, wheat flour, rice flour, potato flour, corn flour, rye flour, buckwheat flour, chestnut flour, chickpea flour, atta flour, pea flour, bean flour, amaranth flour, arrowroot flour, taro flour, cattail flour, acorn flour, sorghum flour, or tapioca flour, or a combination of two or more thereof. The flour, in this case wheat flour, is incorporated in amount of no more than 25% by weight of the meat mixture.


The aroma compound or flavoring compound, provide palatability enhancement respectively and include, but are not limited to, garlic (e.g., garlic concentrate, garlic oil, garlic powder, garlic aroma), onion (e.g., onion concentrate, onion oil, onion powder, onion aroma), natural smoke flavor, hickory, mesquite, anchovy, chicken, lobster, tikka, tandoori, parsley, spinach, saffron, digestive (liquid stomach contents of an animal, e.g., chicken), phosphate, yeast, or enzymatic liver (pork, turkey or chicken), or any derivative thereof, or any combination of two or more thereof. Additionally salt may be added to enhance flavor and can also provide particle binding in forming meat mixture.


The aroma compound or flavoring compound can be used in an amount between about 0% and about 5% by weight of the meat mixture, for example less than about 1% by weight of the meat mixture. The coloring compound can be used in an amount between about 0% and about 4% by weight of the meat mixture, for example less than about 1% by weight of the meat mixture. Flavoring compounds can be used in an amount between about 0% and about 0.5% by weight of the meat mixture, for example about 0.25% by weight of the meat mixture.


Coloring compounds provide cosmetic enhancement respectively and include, but are not limited to, caramel coloring, malliouse, allura red AC, annatto, astaxanthin, betanin or beetroot red, blue 2, brilliant black BN, brilliant blue FCF, brown FK, canthaxanthin, carmine, carotene, Color Blue, curcumin, erythrosine, orange number 1, iron oxide, orange B, ponceau 6R, red 40, red 2G, saffron, sunset yellow FCF, tartrazine, titanium dioxide, turmeric, yellow 5, yellow 2, or any combination of two or more thereof.


The humectant can be used to reduce water activity. Water activity is a measure of the availability of water in a food for microbial growth such as molds. Water activity is a primary method of controlling antimicrobial or mold growth. One example range of water activity is an aW value of less than 0.7. The humectant including sugar, or sugar alcohols can be used in an amount between about 0% and about 20% by weight of the meat mixture, for example about 15% to 18% by weight of the meat mixture. The humectant, can include, but is not limited to fructose, dextrose, maltodextrin, honey, high-fructose corn syrup, maltose, brown sugar, coconut sugar, date sugar, sucanat, molasses, turbinado sugar, dextrin, glucose, sucrose, sucralose, glycerin or any derivative thereof, or any combination of two or more thereof.


The meat mixture may also include a mold inhibitor. A non-exclusive list of mold inhibitors include, but is not limited to, potassium sorbate, cultured whey, calcium propionate, cultured dextrose, cultured yeast, benzoic acid, acetic acid, or plum powder, or any derivative thereof or any combination of two or more thereof.


A moisturizing compound can be used in a range of between 2% and 20%. For example, a moisturizing compound, such as water, will aid in formation of the meat mixture. For example, the moisture content of the meat mixture may be above 20% prior to drying the pet treat, but will achieve a moisture content below 20%, for example 18%, in the final pet treat product.


It should be appreciated that each of these ingredients other than the meat base is optional, such as the ingredients with a percentage range starting at 0%. Table 1 and 2 describe example formulations for pet treat.











TABLE 1






Name
%


















Rice Starch
21.363



Rawhide
21.178



Chicken Meat
13.26



Pork Rawhide
12.683



Duck meat
12.085



Glycerin
11.416



Chicken liver
1.779



Potassium Sorbate
0.155



FD&C Red 40
0.068



FD&C Yellow 6
0.011


















TABLE 2






Name
%








Rawhide
22.81



Chicken breast meat
20.07



Pork Rawhide
17.18



Duck breast
13.15



Wheat flour
11.85



Glycerin
10.21



Chicken liver
 4.58



Garlic powder
 0.14



FD&C Red #40
   0.0004



FD&C yellow #6
   0.0048



FD&C Blue #1
   0.0048



Total Ingredients
100%  









After mixing the meat base with the auxiliary ingredients and optionally subjecting it to a vacuum in the tumbling device, the temperature of the mixture can be checked. If the temperature is too high the mixture can be cooled, by techniques such as the addition of CO2. Conversely, if the temperature is too low additional heat is applied to facilitate the formation of the meat mixture.


Referring now to FIGS. 4 and 6, where the meat mixture is transported to a production area and portioned. Each portion of meat mixture is positioned on the chew stick 30. FIG. 7 shows a perspective view of one or more portions 20 positioned on a chew stick 30. Although not wanting to be bound by any particular theory, the portions of meat mixture can be wrapped around chew stick in a manner that will require that a portion is pinched to remove any gaps. In an alternative embodiment the chew stick is pressed through the middle of portion, similar to placing meat or vegetables on a skewer when making shish kabobs.


In one embodiment, the portion of meat mixture may vary although portions between 0.25 inches and 1.5 inches are typical. The portions will typically range in weight, but will be between 0.25 and 4 oz. Furthermore, although the portions are generally made cylindrical in shape, the portions can be made with other shapes and conformations. For example, the geometrical shape of the base of the cylinder can be selected as desired, such as made round or flat. In addition, the portions can be shaped so as to form, generally round-shaped meat pieces (generally referred to as meatballs), cubic-shaped meat pieces, cylindrical-shaped meat pieces (for example, meat pieces resembling sausages), polygonal-shaped meat pieces, pyramid-shaped meat pieces, heart-shaped meat pieces, flat-wafer-shaped, or other more complex-shaped meat pieces.


Referring now to FIG. 4, once the desired number of portions is positioned on the chew stick, the pet treat may be moved to a surface that will form grooves on the outer surface of the portion. In this regard, the surface can be made of a number of materials. However, the materials must be compatible with the drying temperatures and duration. In one example embodiment, the surface is a net. A net allows for the weight of each pet treat to “nestle” on the netting and thus form grooves along the outer surface of the one or more portions.


The meat pieces can then be transferred via conveyor or manual transportation to a drying oven. The drying step is in an oven at about 40 degrees Celsius to about 60 degrees Celsius. In some example embodiments the drying time is at least 5 hours. In related embodiments, the drying time is between 5 to 7 hours. Additionally the pet treat may further be baked. The optional baking step is at a temperature of at least 80 degrees Celsius for at least 30 minutes.


Once the baking step is finished the pet treats are removed from the oven and allowed to cool. Cold air or any other cold gas is forced on the surface which transports the pet treats from the oven to packaging. Air or gas that is warmed by contact with the pet treats is re-circulated and passed through refrigerated plates to cool the air/gas and then the air/gas is blown again over the pet treat. This process can be repeated numerous times until the pet treats are cooled to a desired temperature.


Referring now to FIGS. 5 and 6, where the cooled pet treats are removed from the surface and will have grooves along the outer surface of the one or more portions. This will give the pet treat the appearance of a grilled shish kabob. In one example embodiment, the surface is a net structure. Prior to packaging, the pet treat may undergo a variety of quality control measures to detect for metal and microbial activity in the finished product. For example, prior to packaging, the pet treats can be sent through a metal detection device. If the presence of metal is detected in the pet treats, the contaminated pet treat is removed from the packaging step.


In one embodiment, air in the bags is displaced (either drawn via a vacuum or pushed with an inert gas or gas blend) so as to reduce the level of oxygen in the bags. Then the bags are filled with the pet treats and the bags are purged in an atmosphere filled with nitrogen or an inert gas such as argon, or a combination of these gases. In another embodiment, the bags are filled with the portions of pet treats in a modified atmosphere containing nitrogen, inert gas (e.g., argon), carbon dioxide, or carbon monoxide, or any combination of two or more these gases. Any of these gasses can comprise about 0% to about 100% by weight of the gas composition. In one embodiment, the bags of pet treats comprise an atmosphere that includes nitrogen gas, carbon dioxide, and carbon monoxide. The purpose of the gas introduction is to reduce the amount of oxygen in the bag.


In general, typical meat or meat-based products include cooked meat with meat juice or fat may not be desirable by the pet owner or consumer. Alternatively, the pet treats described herein offer a more suitable handling. In one example embodiment, the resulting pet treat is made such that it does not leave sticky or oily residue on the fingers of the pet owner or consumer who handles the pet treat. To state another way, the pet treat leaves a minimum amount of residue on the fingers of the consumer. Moreover, the plurality of meat portions allows for a pet treat that has increased palatability and good ingredients.


For example, the addition of flour (e.g., wheat flour) can help soak up the fat content in the meat mixture, hence substantially reducing the potential of having a sticky residue when handling the pet treats. In addition, special blending techniques (e.g., vacuum blending as described in the above paragraphs) and other processes or techniques, maximize blending and reduce the occurrence of large chunks of meat in the meat mixture. The use of a dry oven with reduced humidity, as described in the above paragraphs, can produce pet treats with a substantially dry outer surface. This outer surface can form an outer dry surface to minimize the moisture from the one or more portions from bleeding out. Further, because the one or more portions are dried and the flavoring is found homogenously mixed the likelihood of transferring any dye or flavoring to a decorative surface is reduced because the dye or flavoring is less prone to contacting the decorative surface and is less prone to rub off if it does contact the decorative surface.


As shown in FIGS. 7-9, the final product is a pet treat 10 with one or more portions 20 positioned along a chew stick 30 with the appearance of a shish kabob. Referring to the ingredients and material described above, the pet treat 10 can comprise at least one rawhide section shaped to form a chew stick 30.


The one or more portions 20 are attached to the outside surface of the chew stick 30. If should be appreciated that the number of portions 20 placed along a chew stick will be related to consumer desire and commercial viability. However, the length of the chew stick, size of the one or more portions and proximity of the one or more portions to one another are all factors in determining the number of portions on the pet treat 10. As best shown in FIG. 9, each of the one or more portions are positioned in a manner that provide a space between the next adjacent portion where the outer surface of chew stick 30 is exposed. In some example embodiments, each of the one or more portions are positioned in a substantially equal distance from an adjacent portion. As described above, the one or more portions also comprise grooves on the outer surface.


Referring now to FIGS. 7 and 9 where pet treat is described showing three portions. As shown, each of the three portions 20a, 20b and 20c can be made from the same meat mixture formulation. Alternatively, pet treat can be made where at least two of the one or more portions on the pet treat 10 are from the same meat mixture formulation. In another alternative embodiment each of the one or more portions on the pet treat 10 are a different meat mixture formulation. In a related example embodiment the three portions are pork, beef and chicken or chicken, duck and liver. However, the specific meat mixture used for each portion can be selected from a group consisting of pork, beef, chicken, duck, goat, horse, buffalo, venison, elk, moose, liver, fish, veal, lamb, turkey, goose and combinations thereof.


While various embodiments of the present invention have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example, and not limitation. It will be apparent to persons skilled in the relevant art(s) that various changes in form and detail can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. In fact, after reading the above description, it will be apparent to one skilled in the relevant art(s) how to implement the invention in alternative embodiments. Thus, the present invention should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments. Accordingly, all suitable modifications and equivalents should be considered as falling within the spirit and scope of the invention.


The above specification, examples and data provide a complete description of the manufacture and use of the composition of the invention. Since many embodiments of the invention can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, the invention resides in the claims hereinafter appended.

Claims
  • 1. A method of making a pet treat; the method comprising: forming a chew stick from at least one rawhide section having an outer surface with a stick shape appearance comprising a substantially uniform circumference along the length of the chew stick; andwrapping one or more portions around the circumference of the chew stick; the one or more portions on the pet treat comprise a meat mixture, wherein the meat mixture is from the same meat mixture formulation.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 further including a step of treating the chew stick with an anti-mold solution.
  • 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of wrapping one or more portions around the circumference of the chew stick includes using a meat mixture which comprises a meat base with one or more auxiliary ingredients.
  • 4. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of wrapping one or more portions around the circumference of the chew stick includes using portions having grooves on an outer surface of the one or more portions.
  • 5. The method of claim 2 wherein the step of treating the chew stick with an anti-mold solution includes using a potassium sorbate solution applied to the at least one rawhide section prior to forming the chew stick.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of wrapping one or more portions around the circumference of the chew stick includes wrapping at least three portions and positioning the at least three portions substantially equal distance from an adjacent portion.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of forming a chew stick from at least one rawhide section includes twisting two rawhide sheets together.
  • 8. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of forming a chew stick from at least one rawhide section includes using two rawhide sheets.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, wherein the step of forming a chew stick using two rawhide sheets includes using two rawhide sheets from a different animal source.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of wrapping one or more portions around the circumference of the chew stick includes using a meat mixture comprising a meat base with one or more auxiliary ingredients and wherein each of the one or more portions on the pet treat are a different meat mixture formulation and wherein the pet treat comprises portions each having one of pork, beef and chicken or chicken, duck and liver.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, including forming the pet treat in a lollipop form.
  • 12. A method of making a pet treat comprising: forming a chew stick using at least one rawhide sheet having, an elongate shape and a stick-shaped appearance, wherein the stick-shaped appearance comprises a substantially uniform circumference along the length of the chew stick; anddisposing one or more portions on the outer surface of the chew stick so that the one or more portions each surround the circumference of a region of the chew stick.
  • 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the step of disposing the one or more portions includes using a meat mixture comprising a meat base with one or more auxiliary ingredients and wherein the one or more auxiliary ingredients include a binding agent, a moisturizing compound, a salt, a sugar, an acid, a mold inhibitor, a flavoring compound, an aroma compound, a coloring compound and any combination of two or more thereof.
  • 14. The method of claim 12, wherein the step of disposing the one or more portions includes disposing at least two portions and wherein the at least two portions comprise a meat mixture, wherein the meat mixture is from the same meat mixture formulation or are from a different meat mixture formulation.
  • 15. The method of claim 13, wherein the step of disposing the one or more portions includes positioning the one or more portions on the chew stick by wrapping the at least two portions around the outer surface of the chew stick thereby covering the entire circumference of the chew stick.
  • 16. The method of claim 12, wherein the step of disposing the one or more portions includes using a meat base selected from the group consisting of pork, beef, chicken, duck, goat, horse, buffalo, venison, elk, moose, liver, salmon, veal, lamb, turkey, goose and combinations thereof.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/072,635, filed Oct. 16, 2020, issued Aug. 1, 2023 as U.S. Pat. No. 11,712,049; which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/981,162, filed Dec. 28, 2015, and issued Nov. 24, 2020, as U.S. Pat. No. 10,842,170, the disclosure of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety. One of the main attributes of chew type products is a toughness and flexibility to the point where it takes the dog a long time to consume the product. A great majority of the chew style products include rawhide. While rawhide is used as a base material, it has limited acceptability because it does not maintain a dog's interest. Manufacturers have attempted to solve this problem of reduced acceptability by incorporating numerous ingredients and processing techniques into the manufacture of rawhide-based chews for dogs, such as incorporating meat in the middle of a rawhide stick. Despite this, the basic problem remains. As ingredients or processing techniques are utilized with rawhide to increase palatability, they typically weaken the basic structure of the rawhide and produce a less acceptable product from the standpoint of extended chew time. Further, the rawhide stick does not provide a visually appealing treat for dog. The pet treat also does not give the pet owner a visually acceptable reaction when purchasing the pet treat. What is needed is a pet treat that provides a visually appealing product that stimulates a human to purchase the pet treat. What is needed is a pet treat that provides a palatable product for a pet and can provide an initial taste reward, but also gives the dog a chew portion for sustained pet treat duration. The prior art demonstrates utilizing rawhide in dog chews, Fisher (U.S. Pat. No. 2,988,045) demonstrated the basic techniques of how rawhide can be separated at the tannery and split into layers that can be formed into shapes followed by dehydration to produce a shelf-stable rawhide chew for dogs. A wide range of patents for rawhide chew style products followed, teaching various forms, shapes and methods for utilizing a basic rawhide fraction as a dog chew. This included Lehn (U.S. Pat. No. 4,702,929) which teaches a method for extruding rawhide byproduct fraction, called spetches, with starch to form a dog chew in stick form. Spanier (U.S. Pat. No. 5,047,231) teaches a method of soaking an inorganic pyrophosphate salt into rawhide to form a chew capable of reducing tartar accumulation on the dog's teeth. Perlberg (U.S. Pat. No. 6,223,693) demonstrates a method of soaking rawhide in a humectant and soft edible binder to produce a flexible edible chew. Twain (U.S. Pat. No. 6,425,348) taught a method for producing a chewable pet shelter from rawhide which incorporated chemical flavoring which would appeal to the pet. Kirch (U.S. Pat. No. 6,840,196) demonstrates a pet chew produced by folding a first sheet of rawhide around a second sheet of rawhide. The second sheet is impregnated with a flavoring and protrudes from under the first sheet of rawhide. This system served to increase the palatability of the chew while at the same time reduced the incident of rug staining which can be a problem when the flavoring is present on the surface of the product. Hingst (U.S. Pat. No. 6,895,900) disclosed a combination rawhide and pigskin product where sheets of rawhide and pigskin are sandwiched or intertwined together to form a treat with improved flavor. Jia (U.S. Pat. No. 6,935,275) teaches a method for producing a dog treat by rolling a precut and flavored rawhide piece into a cylinder with strips of hide extending from the outer ends of the cylinder. Hague (U.S. Pat. No. 6,886,497) disclosed a product and method for infusing a rawhide or pigskin with a mint, or chlorophyll, flavoring and applying perforations to the hide so that a dog's teeth would penetrate into the product to assist in the cleaning of the dog's teeth. Some of the most commercially successful products utilizing rawhide as dog treats have taken the approach of incorporating a meat fraction in conjunction with the rawhide to significantly increase the palatability of the chew. Sherrill (U.S. Pat. No. 5,673,653) disclosed a product and process of wrapping jerky sheets on the inside of a roll of rawhide. The jerky fraction protruded from the ends and the horizontal seam of the outside layer so that the dog could quickly be subjected to the flavor of the dehydrated meat fraction. This product is commercially known as a “Dingo” treat. Only a small portion of meat fraction however is initially available to the dog and the manufacturing method of rolling rawhide within sheets of jerky significantly reduce the quantity of meat that can be incorporated on a dry weight basis. Greenburg (U.S. Pat. No. 5,635,237) teaches a method of melting rawhide scraps inside of a twin-screw extruder and producing ropes that can be cut and tied to produce a formulated knotted rawhide bone. While small quantities of meat or flavoring can be incorporated with this method, the necessity to feed the extruder at a reduced moisture level limits the amount of meat fraction that can be included. Andersen (U.S. Pat. No. 6,277,420) demonstrates a method of making a preformed rawhide tube and depositing a shelf-stable liquid meaty filling into the cavity of the tube which gels and then forms a solid matrix on the inside of the rawhide. While this system incorporates large ratios of meaty filling fraction to rawhide, the chew time is somewhat reduced by the high moisture present in the system. Brown (U.S. Pat. No. 6,886,496) has attempted to solve this problem by producing a pre-extruded dried meaty log that could be placed inside of a rolled rawhide cylinder. While this would result in a somewhat extended chew time over many of the earlier treats, a limited fraction of meat is available on the surface of the final chew to maintain a dog's interest for an extended period of time. Further, the initial meat reward may not be sufficient to entice the dog to finish the treat leaving a remnant of the treat behind. Yet there is nothing in the prior art that provides a dry outer meat portion for initial flavor enhancement, with a rawhide chew for a subsequent dog chew that is appealing to a pet. The pet treat being sized to provide an intermediary pet treat that is more substantial than a “reward treat,” (i.e. dog biscuit) but will take less time to consume when compared to a classic rawhide bone.

US Referenced Citations (89)
Number Name Date Kind
1149170 Louis Aug 1915 A
1498800 Lewis Jun 1924 A
2185547 Fowler Jan 1940 A
2469589 Barricini May 1949 A
2988045 Fisher Jun 1961 A
4902519 Ream et al. Feb 1990 A
5635237 Greenberg et al. Jun 1997 A
D391735 Baker Mar 1998 S
D392435 Mocking et al. Mar 1998 S
5773070 Kazemzadeh Jun 1998 A
D408948 Huettner et al. Apr 1999 S
5897893 Mohilef Apr 1999 A
D415803 Cousins Oct 1999 S
6042873 Lawson Mar 2000 A
6054159 Manzone Apr 2000 A
6060100 Koller May 2000 A
D427391 Gill Jun 2000 S
6113956 Bower Sep 2000 A
6159508 Wolf et al. Dec 2000 A
D435713 Speck Jan 2001 S
D435955 Speck Jan 2001 S
6228402 Wolf et al. May 2001 B1
6277420 Andersen et al. Aug 2001 B1
D485046 Hague Jan 2004 S
D489161 Hague May 2004 S
D497457 Willinger Oct 2004 S
6827041 Hague et al. Dec 2004 B2
D503507 Jia et al. Apr 2005 S
D505533 Jia et al. May 2005 S
D508762 Jia et al. Aug 2005 S
D525397 Wang Jul 2006 S
D527164 Speck et al. Aug 2006 S
D530484 Ahmed et al. Oct 2006 S
D534331 Axelrod Jan 2007 S
D544176 Rubin Jun 2007 S
D551426 Ahmed et al. Sep 2007 S
D569077 Axelrod May 2008 S
7485330 Anderson et al. Feb 2009 B2
D594182 Hague Jun 2009 S
D626706 Ragonetti Nov 2010 S
D639967 Bredemeier et al. Jun 2011 S
D644333 Bredemeier et al. Aug 2011 S
D645640 Mingyun et al. Sep 2011 S
D648594 Bray Nov 2011 S
D651771 Shanghui Jan 2012 S
D661458 Mingyun et al. Jun 2012 S
8257775 Axelrod et al. Sep 2012 B2
D672099 Simms et al. Dec 2012 S
D683516 Elias Jun 2013 S
D684746 Pang et al. Jun 2013 S
8491950 Grammer et al. Jul 2013 B2
8496985 Langford Jul 2013 B2
D692627 Yerton et al. Oct 2013 S
D696836 Chen Jan 2014 S
D706943 Bredemeier et al. Jun 2014 S
8747934 Meskendahl et al. Jun 2014 B2
D708417 Allen Jul 2014 S
D708418 Allen Jul 2014 S
D708818 Axelrod et al. Jul 2014 S
D726991 Albuja Apr 2015 S
D752841 Neely et al. Apr 2016 S
D759341 Templeman et al. Jun 2016 S
D762042 Osenga Jul 2016 S
20040005392 Filipi et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040028783 Fullwood et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040126462 Tepper et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040219260 Anderson et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050033157 Klein et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050069609 Straus et al. Mar 2005 A1
20070218171 Mehrle et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070264415 Axelrod et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080014311 Tepper et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080145485 Tepper et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080175962 Grammer et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080193607 Tepper et al. Aug 2008 A1
20090004338 Anderson et al. Jan 2009 A1
20100062111 Langford Mar 2010 A1
20100303970 Grammer et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100304002 Grammer et al. Dec 2010 A1
20120237648 Ortiz Sep 2012 A1
20130029011 Carrillo et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130295235 Albuja et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130309359 Langford Nov 2013 A1
20140186276 Mahe Jul 2014 A1
20140261231 Dunton et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140335223 Grammer et al. Nov 2014 A1
20150090192 Powers et al. Apr 2015 A1
20160029667 Smittle et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160143320 Mahe et al. May 2016 A1
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20240114924 A1 Apr 2024 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 17072635 Oct 2020 US
Child 18227787 US
Parent 14981162 Dec 2015 US
Child 17072635 US