The present invention concerns a pharmaceutical composition for topical application. In particular, the present invention concerns a pharmaceutical composition which is suitable for nasal mucosa administration.
Aqueous pharmaceutical compositions for nasal administration comprising solutions of loratadine are disclosed in WO-A-04082589 and solutions of loratadine and desloratadineare disclosed in WO-A-03101434. The nasal pharmaceutical compositions disclosed in these prior art references comprise relatively low levels of antihistamine in solution.
It is an object of the present invention to provide nasal pharmaceutical compositions which may comprise relatively higher amounts of antihistamine in solution than the prior art solutions but which do not demonstrate increased mucosa irritation.
In accordance with the present invention, there is provided a pharmaceutical composition comprising an aqueous solution having a pH of from 5 to 7.5, preferably from 5 to 7, comprising:
Lutrol is a trademark of BASF SE.
Tween is a trademark of Uniquema Americas LLC.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the pharmaceutical composition comprises an aqueous solution having a pH from 5 to 7.5 comprising:
A particularly preferred pharmaceutical composition of this embodiment comprises an aqueous solution having a pH from 5 to 7 comprising:
In another embodiment of the present invention, the pharmaceutical composition comprises an aqueous solution having a pH from 5 to 7.5 comprising:
A particularly preferred pharmaceutical composition of this embodiment comprises an aqueous solution having a pH from 5 to 7 comprising:
In comparison to the prior art formulations, by using a combination of the four components b), c), d) and e), pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention contain higher dosage levels of antihistamine in solution but overall lower dosages of potential irritants. For example, if component b) was eliminated, higher levels of component c) would be required to solubilise the antihistamine, and visa-versa: higher levels of b) or c) on their own in the composition causes irritation on the nasal mucosa, which in turn leads to a reduction the time the composition may be effective. Similarly, if component d) was eliminated, higher levels of component e) would be required to solubilise the antihistamine, and visa-versa: higher levels of d) or e) on their own in the composition causes irritation on the nasal mucosa, which in turn leads to a reduction the time the composition may be effective.
The pharmaceutical composition of the present invention may contain, in addition to co-solvents b) and c), one or more other co-solvents, such as sorbitol and glycerine, but such co-solvents should be used at non-irritating levels.
The pharmaceutical composition of the present invention may contain, in addition to co-solubilizers b) and c), one or more other co-solubilizers, but such co-solubilizers should be used at non-irritating levels.
The stabilizer is preferably a chelator for the antihistamine.
The aqueous solution may require pH adjustment to the range 5 to 7.5, preferably 5 to 7. This can be achieved readily by a person skilled in the art. For example, if the pH of the solution is lower than 5, then the pH may be raised by the incorporation of an appropriate amount of alkali, such as NaOH solution.
The pharmaceutical composition is especially suitable for nasal administration, for example for the treatment of allergic rhinitis, though it may also be suitable for ocular administration, for example for the relief of allergic conjunctivitis.
The invention in its various embodiments shall now be further described by way of exemplification only:
A pharmaceutical composition according to the present invention was prepared as follows:
10.0 parts by wt PG (Propylene Glycol) and 10.0 parts by wt PEG400 (Macrogol 400) are mixed. The amount of 0.06 parts by wt Loratadine is dissolved in the obtained mixture to obtain Solution A.
Separately, 5.0 parts by wt Lutrol F127 (Poloxamer 407), 1.8 parts by wt Tween 80 (Polysorbate 80) and 0.1 parts by wt Na2EDTA are dissolved in 70 parts by wt purified water, preheated to 60° C., to obtain Solution B.
Solution A is added to Solution B at constant stirring to obtain Solution C.
Solution C is adjusted as necessary to pH 5,5 with 1M solution of Sodium Hydroxide and is complemented to a total of 100 parts w/w with purified water to obtain the final composition.
The composition is as shown in Table 1.
The pharmaceutical composition has the characteristics shown in Table 2:
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0821298.7 | Nov 2008 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2009/055140 | 11/18/2009 | WO | 00 | 9/23/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/058349 | 5/7/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20070048384 | Rosenberg | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070207201 | Krishman | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070286875 | Dagar et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO2003101434 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO2004082589 | Sep 2004 | WO |
2007143382 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2008075102 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO 2010042701 | Apr 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Rahman et al, Pharmazie Feb. 1999;54(2):132-6. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion of ISA—PCT/IB2009/055140. |
New FDA Drug Approval: Patanase (Olopatadine hydrochloride), Center Watch, 2008, 4 pages; http://www.drugs.com/newdrugs/alcon-s-patanase-nasal-approved-fda-nasal-allergy- symptoms-942.html. |
Bousquet et al.; “Allergic Rhinitis and Its Impact on Asthma”, ARIA Workshop Report, The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 108 No. 5, Nov. 2001, 205 pages. |
Bousquet et al.; “Allergic Rhinitis and Its Impact on Asthma”, (ARIA) 2008 Update (in collaboration with the World ealth Organization, GA2LEN* and AllerGEN**), Allergy 2008, 63, Suppl. 86,: pp. 8-160. |
Corren et al.; “Effectiveness of Azelastine Nasal Spray Compared with Oral Cetirizine in Patients with Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis”, Clinical Therapeutics, vol. 27, No. 5, May 2005, pp. 543-553. |
Berger et al.; “Impact of azelastine nasal spray on symptoms and quality of life compared with cetirizine oral tablets in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis”, vol. 97, Sep. 2006, pp. 375-381. |
LaForce et al.; “Efficacy of azelastine nasal spray in seasonal allergic rhinitis patients who remain symptomatic after treatment with fexofenadine”, Annals of Allergy, Asthma Immunology, Aug. 2004; 93(2): pp. 154-159, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15328675. |
Simon et al.; “H1 Antihistiamines: Current Status and Future Directions”, World Allergy Organization Journal, 2008, 1:45-155; http://www.waojournal.org/content/1/9/145. |
Sherbiny et al.; “Simultaneous determination of loratadine and desloratadine in pharmaceutical preparations using liquid chromatography with a microemulsion as eluent”, Science Direct, Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 43, 2007, pp. 1236-1242. |
Tzachev et al.; “Comparison of the clinical efficacy of standard and mucoadhesive-based nasal decongestants”, 2002, Blackwell Science Ltd., Br. J. Clin Pharmacol, 2002, 53:(1), pp. 107-109. |
Horak; “Effectiveness of twice daily azelastine nasal spray in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis”; Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management 2008:4(5) pp. 1009-1022; 14 pages. |
Bousquet et al.; “Pharmacologic and anti-IgE treatment of allergic rhinitis ARIA update (in collaboration with GA2 LEN)”; Allergy 2006: 61: 1086-1096; 11 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140088134 A1 | Mar 2014 | US |