Aoyama et al. (1990), Kinetic Analysis of Enantiomers of threo —Methylphenidate and Its Metabolite in Two Healthy Subjects After Oral Administration as Determined by a Gas Chromatographic—Mass Spectrometric Method, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 79(6):465-469. |
Aoyama et al. (1993), “Nonlinear Kinetics of threo—Methylphenidate Enantiomers in a Patient with Narcolepsy and in Healthy Volunteers,” European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 44:79-84. |
Aoyama et al. (1994), “Stereospecific Distribution of Methylphenidate Enantiomers in Rat Brain: Specific Binding to Dopamine Reuptake Sites,” Pharmaceutical Research 11(3):407-411. |
Aoyama et al. (1994), “Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of (+)-threo-Methylphenidate Enantiomer in Patients with Hypersomnia,” Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics 55(3):270-276 |
Conte et al. (2000), “A Flexible Technology for the Linear, Pulsatile and Delayed Release of Drugs, Allowing for Easy Accommodation of Difficult In Vitro Targets,” Journal of Controlled Release 64:263-268. |
Ding et al. (1994), “Pharmacokinetics and In Vivo Specificity of [11C]dl-threo-Methylphenidate for the Presynaptic Dopaminergic Neuron,” Synapse 18:152-160. |
Ding et al. (1995), “Carbon-11-d-threo-Methylphenidate Binding to Dopamine Transporter in Baboon Brain,” The Journal of Nuclear Medicine 36(12):2298-2305. |
Ferris et al. (1978), “Comparison of the Effects of the Isomers of Amphetamine, Methylphenidate and Deoxypipradrol on the Uptake of l-[3H] Norepinephrine and [3H] Dopamine by Synaptic Vesicles from Rat Whole Brain, Striatum and Hypothalamus,”The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics210(3):422-428. |
Gatley et al. (1995), “Binding of d-threo-[11C] Methylphenidate to the Dopamine Transporter in Vivo: Insensitivity to Synaptic Dopamine,” European Journal of Pharmacology 281:141-149. |
Hubbard et al. (1989), “Enantioselective Aspects of the Disposition of dl-threo-Methylphenidate After the Administration of a Sustained-Release Formulation to Children with Attention Deficit-Hyperactivity Disorder,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences , 78(11):944-947. |
Janowsky et al. (1985), “The Effects of Surgical and Chemical Lesions on Striatal [3H]threo-(±)-Methylphenidate Binding: Correlation with [3H]Dopamine Uptake,” European Journal of Pharmacology108:187-191. |
Jonkman et al. (1998), “Differences in Plasma Concentrations of the D-and L-threo Methylphenidate Enantiomers in Responding and Non-Responding Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder,” Psychiatry Research, 78:115-118. |
Patrick et al. (1981)) “Synthesis and Pharmacology of Hydroxylated Metabolites of Methylphenidate ,”Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 24(10):1237-1240. |
Patrick et al. (1987), “Pharmacology of the Enantiomers of threo-Methylphenidate,” The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 24(10):152-158. |
Schweri et al. (1985), “[3H] Threo-(±)-Methylphenidate Binding to 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylethylamine Uptake Sites in Corpus Striatum: Correlation with the Stimulant Properties of Ritalinic Acid Esters,” Journal of Neurochemistry45(4):1062-1070. |
Srinivas et al. (1991), “Extensive and Enantioselective Presystemic Metabolism of DL-threo-Methylphenidate in Humans,” Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry 15:213-220. |
Srinivas et al. (1992), “Stereoselective Urinary Pharmacokinetics of dl-threo-Methylphenidate and Its Major Metabolite in Humans,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 81(8):747-749. |
Srinivas et al. (1992), “Enantioselective Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of dl-threo-Methylphenidate in Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder,” Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 52(5):561-568. |
Srinivas et al. (1993), “Enantioselective Pharmacokinetics of dl-threo-Methylphenidate in Humans,” Pharmaceutical Research10(1):14-21. |
Wong et al. (1998), “Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics of Modafinil and Methylphenidate Given Alone or in Comibation in Healthy Male Volunteers,” The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 38(3):276-282. |