This invention generally relates to radio frequency (RF) circuitry and, more particularly, to a wireless communications circuit capable of shifting the phase of a signal, while maintaining a constant signal gain.
Phase-shifting circuits are used in many electronic applications, such as in oscillator, phase-locked loops, and filters. RF and microwave frequency phase shift circuits are also useful as components in antenna array systems. The utility of phase-shifting circuits will be illustrated below, using the antenna array as an example.
As noted in U.S. Pat. No. 4,105,959, invented by V. Stachejko, a microwave phase shifter is a device that is capable of changing its electrical length, or phase, in a predictable manner in response to a proper command signal. In a phased array radar system, the electrical length of transmission lines interconnecting parts of the system is critical. For purposes of regulating the phase of transmitted or received signals, the electrical length of transmission lines between a transceiver and the several radiating elements in the antenna array must be made to vary. A typical system requires, for example, several antennae and phase shifters.
Microwave phase shifters were conventional fabricated using either diodes or ferrites as the switched material, using coaxial, stripline, microstrip, or waveguide construction. Several types of diode phase shifters have been devised such as switched line, hybrid coupled, loaded line, and three element “π.” or “T” circuits. In particular, the hybrid coupled circuit includes a 3-decibel (db)-quadrature hybrid with a pair of balanced diode switches connected to identical split arms of the hybrid. The hybrid coupler has been used extensively because it achieves larger phase shifts while using only two diodes.
One of the undesirable characteristics of the hybrid coupled diode phase shifter is the unbalance in the insertion loss, as the diodes are switched between the phase states. This unbalance results from the difference in loss produced by the diodes in the conducting state (“on”) and the non-conducting state (“off”). The insertion loss is a measure of the change in power (amplitude) between the RF input and output of the phase shifter. It is desirable that the amplitude of the outputs be the same as that of the input and, thus, the difference in insertion loss between the diode switching states be zero. A phase shifter having substantially equal insertion loss between the phase shifter states is desirable for wide frequency band operation. Accurate steering of an antenna beam in a radar system, for example, requires that the phase and amplitude errors be kept small.
Phase shifters made from inductor-capacitor (LC) components suffer from similar problems. As in an LC filter, minimum insertion loss is obtained at the resonant frequency. Changes in phase can be obtained by shifting the resonance away from signal frequency. However, a shift in the signal phase necessarily is accompanied with a change in the signal insertion loss. Thus, LC circuits are prone to the same problems as the above-mentioned diode phase shifters.
With the advent of digital technology, analog-to-digital (A/D) processing techniques have been applied to solve problems associated with the use of the above-mentioned passive and diode components. As noted in U.S. Pat. No. 6,784,831, Wang et al., the signals received from a number of antenna elements can be supplied to signal processing channels, which provide a variable gain and variable phase shift to such signals. An antenna pattern for the combined receive signal can be formed by a set of specific gain values and phase shift values over the signal processing channels, and a specific geometry and placement of the N antenna elements. The set of specific gain values and phase shift values is commonly referred to as “weights” (or “weight vector”) for the phased array antenna system. A unique advantage of the phased array antenna system is that the antenna pattern can be adjusted by changing the “weights” to perform one or both of the following operations:
a) beam steering: steering the beam by adjusting the phase shift values of the pattern for each processing channel; no adjustment to the gain values of the pattern is necessary; or
b) antenna null: the phase shift values and gain values of the pattern are adjusted to the suppress signal (i.e., interference) from a specific direction.
One form of architecture utilizes a large number of analog-to-digital converters (e.g., one for each antenna element), which substantially increases the cost of the system. Another drawback is that the input signal level of the analog-to-digital converter needs to be at a substantially higher level as compared to that of the received signal at the antenna element. Thus, the received signal needs to be amplified by one or more stages of amplifiers in order to bring the received signal to a level that the analog-to-digital converter can operate properly. Such multistage amplification increases the cost of the system. Yet another drawback of this architecture is that is difficult to maintain the signal delays precisely through the channels because the number of processing elements between the antenna element and the analog-to-digital converter is high. Such precise signal delays are required for accurate beam steering and nulling operations. Thus, calibration of these signal delays is required, which limits the suitability of this prior art phased array antenna system in many wireless communication applications. Another problem, at least with portable handsets, is that there may not necessarily be enough space to house, or power to operate all these components.
Many wireless communication receivers suffer from multipath errors, which are caused by the receiver receiving a composite of the direct signals, and reflected signals from nearby objects such as the ground or nearby buildings. The occurrence of such multipath errors is common within cities with high-rise buildings. A typical antenna can receive-both direct line of sight (LOS) signals and multipath signals. The direct line of sight (LOS) signal and the multipath signal are summed according to their relative phase and strength, resulting in a composite signal having a timing epoch that is different from that of the direct line of sight (LOS) signals. The receiver may be incapable of distinguishing and “rejecting” the reflected signal from the direct line of sight (LOS) signal unless the signal propagation delays of the two signals differ substantially. Beam steering operations can potentially provide antenna gain to reinforce direct signals and nulling operations are used to minimize the effect of received multipath signals. The drawbacks of the architecture of this phased array antenna system as described above also limit its suitability in addressing multipath rejection. More specifically, precise signal delays are required for accurate beam steering/nulling operations that are required for effective multipath rejection. Thus, calibration of these signal delays is required, which limits the suitability of this prior art phased array antenna system in many applications where the user is not realistically expected to maintain and calibrate the equipment.
It would be advantageous if a relatively simple phase-shifter circuit could be devised that could provide a uniform gain at every signal frequency.
A parallel LC network creates a tuned tank circuit whose resonant frequency is determined by the expression: f0=1/(2π(L*C)1/2).
The frequency response of such a circuit is well known. The tank circuit's minimum insertion loss (IL) occurs at f0. The IL is a function of the intrinsic losses of both the inductor and capacitor. Another defining characteristic of the circuit is its phase response. The phase of a signal varies between +45 degrees and −45 degrees between the 3 dB points, where the IL is 3 dB less than the minimum IL. Thus, a filter tuned between its upper and lower 3 dB points changes the phase of a signal by 90 degrees (+45 to −45 degrees). Cascading two tank circuits together can create a phase differential as large as 180 degrees. The two tanks circuits can be isolated through a variable gain amplifier. The gain of the amplifier can be varied to compensate for the ILs associated with each tank circuit. Therefore, a flat amplitude response can be obtained over the entire 180-degree phase shift range. A phase splitter at the output of the circuit can be used to selectively provide an additional 180-degree phase shift, as well as additional buffering. The end result is that the circuit provides a flat amplitude response, while shifting the signal phase anywhere within the range of 0 to 360 degrees.
In one aspect, ferroelectric (FE) capacitors are used as tuning elements in the tank circuits. The FE capacitors are used to both coarsely adjust the center frequency (f0) of the tank circuits, and finely adjust the circuits to obtain the desired phase shift. Using lumped components, the tank circuits can be used for signals in the range between audio and L-band. Using microstrip or stripline inductors, the frequency range may extend well beyond 1 gigahertz (GHz).
Accordingly, a constant-gain phase shifter is provided, comprising a first tank circuit with a first node to accept an input signal, a first inductor connected between the first node and a reference voltage, and a first capacitor connected in parallel with the first inductor between the first node and the reference voltage. The first tank circuit modifies the phase and the insertion loss associated with the input signal.
A variable gain circuit has an input connected to the first node, an input to accept a control signal, and an output to supply a gain-modified signal. A second tank circuit comprises a second node connected to the variable insertion loss circuit output to supply a constant-gain phase-shifted signal. The second tank circuit comprises a second inductor connected between the second node and the reference voltage, and a second capacitor connected in parallel with the second inductor between the first node and the reference voltage. The second tank circuit modifies the phase and insertion loss associated with the gain-modified signal.
As noted above, both the first and second tank circuits have a minimum insertion loss (ILmin) at their resonant frequencies (f0) and a +/−45 degree phase shift at frequencies associated with a 3 dB insertion loss (ILmin1–3 dB). Also as noted above, the first and second capacitors can be variable capacitance capacitors, such as FE capacitors.
In one aspect, the phase shifter further comprises a phase splitter having an input connected to the second node to accept the constant-gain phase-shifted signal, a first output to supply a first phase signal, and a second output to supply a second phase signal offset from the first phase signal by 180 degrees. Passive and active phase splitters are described.
Additional details of the above-described phase shifter circuit, an antenna array using the above-described phase shifter, and a method for maintaining constant gain, while phase-shifting a signal, are provided below.
A variable gain circuit 112 has as input connected to the first node 104, and an output to supply a gain-modified signal at a second node 118. Typically, the variable gain circuit is a variable gain amplifier, but alternately is could be a variable loss attenuator (not shown). A second tank circuit 116 comprises second node 118 connected to the output of the variable gain circuit 112, to supply a constant-gain phase-shifted signal. A second inductor 120 is connected between the second node 118 and the reference voltage 108. A second capacitor 122 is connected in parallel with the second inductor 120 between the second node 118 and the reference voltage 108. The second tank circuit modifies the phase and insertion loss associated with the gain-modified signal.
The first inductor 106 and the second inductor 120 may be lumped element, microstrip, or volumetric resonators. The first capacitor 110 and second capacitor 122 are lumped element components. Using these types of components, the first tank circuit 102 and second tank circuit 116 can accept input signals all the way from audio, to frequencies of greater than 2 gigahertz.
Thus, the first capacitor 110 has an input to accept a phase control signal on line 130. The first tank circuit 102 modifies its resonant frequency in response to the phase control signal, to supply a modified input signal. The modified input signal is shifted in phase a first number of degrees and has a first insertion loss, respective to the input signal.
Likewise, the second capacitor 122 has an input to accept a phase control signal on line 132. The second tank circuit 116 modifies its resonant frequency in response to the phase control signal on line 132. The second tank circuit 116 supplies an output signal shifted a second number of degrees, and with a second insertion loss, respective to the gain-modified signal from the variable gain circuit 112. The variable gain circuit 112 accepts a control signal on line 134, and varies the gain of the gain-modified signal (the amplifier output), to compensate for first insertion loss associated with the first tank circuit 102, as well as the second insertion loss associated with the second tank circuit 116.
Returning to
In another aspect, the gain of the variable gain circuit 112 can be controlled to compensate for any additional losses that may occur through the above-described phase splitter 140.
A summing circuit 610 has inputs connected to each constant gain phase-shifter circuit output 608a, 608b, and 608n. The summing circuit 610 has an output on line 612 to supply a summed signal that is a combination of all the summing circuit inputs. A variety of conventional summing circuit and antenna designs may be used to enable the system 600. The primary novelty of the system 600 is in the phase shifter circuit 100. Details of the constant-gain phase shifter 100 are provided in the explanations of
The system 600 does not require an additional amplification between the phase shifters and the summing circuit to compensate for insertion loss through the phase shifters. In one aspect not shown, the system 600 may further include measurement circuitry between each phase shifter and the summing circuit, to fine-tune or calibrate each phase shifter 100. It should also be noted that the antenna array system 600 may receive signals, transmit signals, or perform both functions.
Functional Description
Si(t)A(f)=So(t)
The input signal frequency (fm) may, or may not be equal to the tank circuit resonant frequency (f0). It is assumed that Si(t) is a sinusoidal signal, and narrowband with respect to the filter bandwidth (fH–fL). If
At a frequency (f), between fH and fL
|A(f)|<1; and
(θ)≦45°.
In
G=1/|A(f)|.
So(t)=G(f)*A1(f)*A2(f)*sin(ωt+θt)
To minimize the gain required through the variable gain circuit, and to minimize receiver noise figure, the tunable capacitor used within the tank circuits should be of sufficiently low loss. The total loss of a capacitor, Lt, whether tunable or not, is given by a ratio of its dissipated to stored energy, where the energy is stored in the electric field and dissipated in resistance, i.e., Lt=(dissipated energy)/(stored energy). The inverse of this loss is the quality factor, Q. For a capacitor, Lt may be given by the quantity (ω*Rs*C), where ω is the frequency in radians, Rs is the total series resistance of the capacitor, and C is the capacitance.
The importance of determining the total loss given by an FE capacitor in a resonant circuit can be seen from the following equations:
Lc=1/Qc and 1/Qt=1/Qc+1/Qu, where,
Lc=the loss of the capacitor;
Qt=the total Q of the FE capacitor and the resonator or inductor combined;
Qc=the Q of the capacitor; and
Qu=the Q of the unloaded resonator or alternatively, the Q of an inductor used to create a parallel resonant circuit.
As Qc increases, it will affect the Qt less. If Qc is infinite, it has no affect on Qt. For practical purposes, this is also true if Qc is approximately 10*Qu. The converse is true too. As Qu becomes higher relative to Qc, Qu has less effect on Qt. In either case, the highest practical Qc is desired.
In the PCS band, for a 1.0 pF tunable capacitor to have a Qc=250 at 2.0 GHz, Rs must be 0.32 Ω (ohms). To minimize loss (obtain a low Rs), an accounting of all loss mechanisms is desirable.
For FE devices, the total loss is governed by summing each source contribution as follows:
Lt=Lgeom+Lattach+Lmetal+Lsub+Lrad+Lmeas+LFE;
where Lgeom is derived from the topology of the capacitor,
Lattach is loss due to device attachment,
Lmetal is the total metal loss,
Lsub is the base substrate loss (if present),
Lrad is the radiation loss, both desired and undesired,
Lmeas is the total loss arising from measurement errors, and
LFE is the FE loss tangent. A more detailed treatment of this subject can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 6,639,491, which is incorporated herein by reference.
FE film properties and fabrication play a significant role in overall capacitor loss. Many techniques exist to mitigate and minimize FE film loss. One feature of FE films is that FE film loss and tunability usually have an inverse relationship. That is, they usually must be traded off against each other. The greater the FE dielectric constant tuning range, the greater the FE loss in most cases.
Thus, even though FE materials can achieve a dielectric constant tuning range of about 3 to 1, less tuning may be acceptable for a given filter application. In that case, less tuning would be chosen, with the benefit of less loss. For example, in the US PCS CDMA band, the tuning requirement in the transmit band is from 1850 MHz to 1910 MHz, or about 4%. Even if the KPCS and USPCS is combined (1750 to 1910 MHz, or about 8%), the FE material can have significantly less tunability than 3 to 1.
For example, an FE gap capacitor with 0.6 pF at 0V DC bias, needs to tune 33%, (from 0.6 pF down to 0.4 pF), to tune over the PCS transmit band. The actual tuning range depends on the filter topology and the band over which the BPF must be tuned. The required tuning voltage to provide the 33% tuning in this example depends on the FE capacitor geometry, including FE film thickness, and the FE film characteristics. The effect of dielectric constant tunability on frequency tunability is determined by the filter topology.
With respect to Lgeom for a gap capacitor, the major contributions to loss are the four corners formed by the gap. These losses can be reduced by rounding the corners. In comparison to gap and interdigital capacitors, an overlay capacitor has the lowest Lgeom. An overlay capacitor is an example of a parallel plate geometry where the plate dimensions (length and width) are much greater than the plate separation. Given such a geometry, most of the electric field between the plates is uniform except for fringing along the edges. The fringing effect can be reduced significantly by the use of a guard band. Thus, the geometric loss from a parallel plate capacitor is quite low. In addition, parallel plate geometries can provide high capacitances along with high tuning from small control voltage swings.
In general, a gap capacitor is easiest to fabricate. An IDC is next easiest, and an overlay capacitor is hardest of these three. Compared to an IDC, the gap capacitor has a better Q, but lower capacitance per unit cross-section. The IDC's capacitance is greater due to the use of a number of fingers per unit cross section. For many communication filter applications, however, a large capacitance (C greater than 4.0 pF) is not needed. Thus, a gap capacitor often can provide adequate capacitance. The inherently high value of dielectric constant for most FE films helps provide relatively high capacitance per unit cross section, compared to a conventional gap capacitor.
The highest possible Qu for a resonator should be used to minimize IL, given size and height constraints. To define Qu, a tank circuit can defined, which is formed by a resonator shunt-connected with a capacitor. The resonator may be grounded quarter wavelength resonator, but the length of the resonator can be selected to obtain a particular inductance value. Volumetric resonators (e.g., coaxial, stripline, and monoblock) are often preferred, as they provide the highest Qu and smallest area and height at a minimal price, as compared to planar, i.e., microstrip, alternatives. For high volume applications, such as wireless handsets, transverse electromagnetic (TEM) wave volumetric resonators may be preferred. Such volumetric resonators can be ceramic loaded coaxial resonators, slabline (monoblock) or stripline, to name the three most common realizations.
Step 1102 accepts an input signal. Step 1106 supplies a modified input signal, modified a first number of degrees and with a first insertion loss, respective to the input signal. Step 1108 amplifies the modified input signal to supply a gain-modified signal. Step 1110 supplies a constant-gain phase-shifted signal, modified a second number of degrees and with a second insertion loss, respective to the gain-modified signal.
In one aspect, modifying the input signal a first number of degrees respective to the input signal (Step 1106) comprises the first number of degrees being in the range of +45 to −45 degrees. Likewise, in Step 1110 the second number of degrees is in the range of +45 to −45 degrees.
In another aspect, Step 1106 modifies the input signal with a first tank circuit resonant at approximately the frequency of the input signal, and Step 1110 modifies the gain-modified signal with a second tank circuit resonant at approximately the frequency of the input signal.
In one aspect, Step 1106 modifies the input signal by varying the capacitance of a first capacitor connected in parallel with a first inductor. Likewise, Step 1110 modifies the gain-modified signal by varying the capacitance of a second capacitor connected in parallel with a second inductor.
In another aspect an additional step, Step 1104 supplies first and second control signals. Then, Step 1106 varies the capacitance of the first capacitor by selecting the dielectric constant value of a ferroelectric (FE) dielectric capacitor in response to the first control signal. Step 1110 varies the capacitance of the second capacitor by selecting the dielectric constant value of an FE dielectric capacitor in response to the second control signal.
In one aspect, Step 1112 phase splits the constant-gain phase-shifted signal. Step 1114 supplies a first phase signal. Step 1116 supplies a second phase signal, offset from the first phase signal by 180 degrees.
In one variation, Step 1114 highpass filters to supply the first phase signal offset from the constant-gain phase-shifted signal by +90 degrees. Supplying a second phase signal, in Step 1116, comprises lowpass filtering to supply the second phase signal offset from the constant-gain phase-shifted signal by −90 degrees. Typically, second-order highpass and lowpass filters are used to perform steps 1114 and 1116, respectively.
In a second variation, Step 1114 uses the emitter output of an emitter-coupled transistor to supply the first phase signal offset from the constant-gain phase-shifted signal by zero degrees. Step 1116 uses the collector output of the emitter-coupled transistor to supply the second phase signal offset from the constant-gain phase-shifted signal by 180 degrees.
A constant-gain phase shifter circuit, an antenna array using the constant-gain phase shifter, and a constant-gain phase shifting method have been provided. Specific filter topologies and designs have been used as examples to illustrate the invention. However, the invention is not limited to merely these examples. Likewise, although an antenna array is shown as an exemplary circuit application, many other applications are possible. Other variations and embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art having the benefit of this disclosure.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/981,814, filed Nov. 5, 2004 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,116,954, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/076,171, filed Feb. 12, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,816,714, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/283,093, filed Apr. 11, 2001, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference. This application is a further continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/120,938 filed Apr. 10, 2002, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3239838 | Kelleher | Mar 1966 | A |
3413543 | Schubring et al. | Nov 1968 | A |
3569795 | Gikow | Mar 1971 | A |
3676803 | Simmons | Jul 1972 | A |
3678305 | George | Jul 1972 | A |
3680135 | Boyer | Jul 1972 | A |
3737814 | Pond | Jun 1973 | A |
3739299 | Adler | Jun 1973 | A |
3836874 | Maeda et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3918012 | Peuzin | Nov 1975 | A |
4122400 | Medendorp et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4236125 | Bernard et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4475108 | Moser | Oct 1984 | A |
4484157 | Helle et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4494081 | Lea et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4525720 | Corzine et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4604593 | Yarman | Aug 1986 | A |
4626800 | Murakami et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4733328 | Blazej | Mar 1988 | A |
4736169 | Weaver et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4737797 | Siwiak et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4746925 | Toriyama | May 1988 | A |
4792939 | Hikita et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4799066 | Deacon | Jan 1989 | A |
4835499 | Pickett | May 1989 | A |
4835540 | Haruyama et al. | May 1989 | A |
4847626 | Kahler et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4975604 | Barta | Dec 1990 | A |
5045821 | Staudinger et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5166857 | Avanic et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5173709 | Lauro et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5212463 | Babbitt et al. | May 1993 | A |
5216392 | Fraser | Jun 1993 | A |
5227748 | Sroka | Jul 1993 | A |
5231407 | McGirr et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5281974 | Kuramoto et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5293408 | Takahashi et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5307031 | Dick | Apr 1994 | A |
5307033 | Koscica et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5325099 | Nemit et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5388021 | Stahl | Feb 1995 | A |
5406163 | Carson et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5416803 | Janer | May 1995 | A |
5427988 | Sengupta et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5450092 | Das | Sep 1995 | A |
5451915 | Katzin et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5459123 | Das | Oct 1995 | A |
5472935 | Yandrofski et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5479139 | Koscica et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5495215 | Newell et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5496795 | Das | Mar 1996 | A |
5496796 | Das | Mar 1996 | A |
5502422 | Newell et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5525942 | Horii et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5557286 | Varadan et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5561307 | Mihara et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5561407 | Koscica et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5564086 | Cygan et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5574410 | Collins et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5577025 | Skinner | Nov 1996 | A |
5583524 | Milroy | Dec 1996 | A |
5589845 | Yandrofski | Dec 1996 | A |
5600279 | Mori | Feb 1997 | A |
5617104 | Das | Apr 1997 | A |
5640042 | Koscica et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5649306 | Vanatta et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5652599 | Wallace et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5673188 | Lusher et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5701595 | Green, Jr. | Dec 1997 | A |
5721194 | Yandrofski et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5729239 | Rao | Mar 1998 | A |
5777524 | Wojewoda et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5777839 | Sameshina et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5778308 | Sroka et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5830591 | Sengupta et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5834975 | Bartlett et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5864932 | Evans et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5870670 | Ripley | Feb 1999 | A |
5880921 | Tham et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892486 | Cook et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5908811 | Das | Jun 1999 | A |
5910994 | Lane et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5945887 | Makino et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5965494 | Terashima et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5973567 | Heal et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5973568 | Shapiro et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5986515 | Sakurai | Nov 1999 | A |
5987314 | Salto | Nov 1999 | A |
5990766 | Zhan | Nov 1999 | A |
6008659 | Traynor | Dec 1999 | A |
6018282 | Tsuda | Jan 2000 | A |
6020787 | Kim et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6026311 | Willemsen Cortes et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6028561 | Takei | Feb 2000 | A |
6049726 | Gruenwald et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6052036 | Enstrom et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6054908 | Jackson | Apr 2000 | A |
6094588 | Adam | Jul 2000 | A |
6097263 | Mueller et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6101102 | Brand et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108191 | Bruchhaus et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6160524 | Wilber | Dec 2000 | A |
6181777 | Kiko | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6198441 | Okabe | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6216020 | Findikoglu | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6242843 | Pohjonen et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6272336 | Appel et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6278383 | Endo et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281023 | Eastep et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281534 | Arita et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285337 | West et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292143 | Romanofsky | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6294964 | Satoh | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6308051 | Atokawa | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6327463 | Welland | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6329959 | Varadan et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6333719 | Varadan | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6335710 | Falk et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6344823 | Deng | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6359444 | Grimes | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6362784 | Kane et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6362789 | Trumbull et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6384785 | Kamogawa et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6404304 | Kwon et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6456236 | Hauck et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6462628 | Kondo et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6489860 | Ohashi | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6503786 | Klodzinski | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6518850 | Falk et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6518920 | Proctor, Jr. et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6522220 | Yamada et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6525630 | Zhu et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6525691 | Varadan et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6531936 | Chiu et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6559737 | Nagra et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6571110 | Patton et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6600456 | Gothard et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6653977 | Okabe et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6667723 | Forrester | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6686817 | Zhu et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6721293 | Komulainen et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6727535 | Sengupta et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6819203 | Taniguchi | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6842086 | Zennamo, Jr. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
20010026243 | Koitsalu et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010043159 | Masuda et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020049064 | Banno | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020093400 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020149526 | Tran et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020149535 | Toncich | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020175878 | Toncich | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030062971 | Toncich | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030134665 | Kato et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040087280 | Watanabe et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040162047 | Kasahara et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040196121 | Toncich | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040212457 | Eden et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040263411 | Fabrega-Sanchez et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050007291 | Fabrega-Sanchez et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
40 36 866 | Jul 1991 | DE |
100 24 483 | Nov 2001 | DE |
101 37 753 | Feb 2003 | DE |
0 125 586 | Nov 1984 | EP |
0 346 089 | Dec 1989 | EP |
0 473 373 | Mar 1992 | EP |
0 531 125 | Mar 1993 | EP |
0 631 399 | Dec 1994 | EP |
0 637 131 | Feb 1995 | EP |
0 680 108 | Nov 1995 | EP |
0 795 922 | Sep 1997 | EP |
0 854 567 | Jul 1998 | EP |
0 872 953 | Oct 1998 | EP |
0 881 700 | Dec 1998 | EP |
0 892 459 | Jan 1999 | EP |
0 909 024 | Apr 1999 | EP |
1 043 741 | Oct 2000 | EP |
1 058 333 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1 248 317 | Oct 2002 | EP |
2 240 227 | Jul 1991 | GB |
63 128618 | Jun 1988 | JP |
05182857 | Jul 1993 | JP |
2001 338839 | Dec 2001 | JP |
WO 8203510 | Oct 1982 | WO |
WO 9427376 | Nov 1994 | WO |
WO 0035042 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0062367 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 03058759 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 02084798 | Oct 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050207518 A1 | Sep 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60283093 | Apr 2001 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10076171 | Feb 2002 | US |
Child | 10981814 | US | |
Parent | 11060010 | US | |
Child | 10981814 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10981814 | Nov 2004 | US |
Child | 11060010 | US | |
Parent | 10120938 | Apr 2002 | US |
Child | 11060010 | US |