The present disclosure relates to systems and methods for capturing light-field data, and more specifically, to enhanced autofocus systems for light-field cameras.
Light-field imaging is the capture of four-dimensional light-field data that provides not only spatial information regarding light received from a scene, but also angular information indicative of the angle of incidence of light received from the scene by the camera's optical elements. Such four-dimensional information may be used to project a variety of two-dimensional images, including images at various focus depths, relative to the camera. Further, the light-field information may be used to ascertain the depth of objects in the scene. Yet further, the light-field information may be used to enable and/or facilitate various image processing steps by which the light-field and/or projected two-dimensional images may be modified to suit user requirements.
In conventional photography, a wide variety of autofocus systems are used. In phase detection autofocus implementations, the camera typically has a separate optical pathway, which may be accessed by diverting some of the incoming light away from the path leading to the image sensor used to capture the image. The diverted light may be conveyed to an autofocus module, which may include several pairs of miniature image sensors. Each pair may be positioned to measure the focus at a particular focus point in the scene. Such autofocus systems can add significantly to the cost, expense, and complexity of the camera, and can cause the loss of some of the light that could otherwise be used to facilitate proper image exposure in the main image sensor.
Contrast detection autofocus systems may determine the level of focus of image data by assessing the contrast of the image. Such systems may not require the use of a separate optical pathway for implementation of the autofocus system; however, such systems may require the lens to sweep through a broad range of focus positions, capturing images at each one, so that the contrast levels of the images can be compared. Thus, contrast detection autofocus systems may be relatively slow in operation.
Accordingly, known autofocus systems for conventional and light-field image capture are deficient in many respects. Phase detection and contrast detection autofocus systems both have significant drawbacks that have not been sufficiently addressed.
In some embodiments, the architecture of the light-field camera may facilitate the implementation of autofocus techniques that do not require the use of a separate optical pathway or image sensors. Rather, the same optical pathway and image sensor used to capture the light-field image may be used to capture preliminary light-field data that can be analyzed to automatically focus the main lens of the camera.
In some embodiments, a plenoptic light-field camera may be used. The plenoptic light-field camera may have an aperture, a main lens, a microlens array, and an image sensor. According to one method, light may be received through the aperture via the main lens of the light-field camera at a first focus setting. The light may be directed to the image sensor via an optical pathway. The image sensor may capture the light to generate preliminary light-field data. The preliminary light-field data may be used to generate an offset, which may be used to refocus the main lens to a second focus setting. This procedure may be repeated until the light-field camera is properly focused.
In some embodiments, the offset may be generated via an algorithm that uses the preliminary light-field data to carry out phase detection. The algorithm may analyze a plurality of subaperture images generated from the preliminary light-field data. The subaperture images may be cropped at the same position, and then the cropped subaperture images may be compared. Specifically, one or more features appearing in each of the cropped subaperture images may be identified, and the positions of these features may be compared in the subaperture images. This may lead to the identification of the offset. The offset may be a vector indicating the direction and magnitude of refocusing needed to bring the image into proper focus. The offset may be used to refocus the main lens prior to image capture.
In some embodiments, contrast detection may be carried out in addition to or in place of phase detection. According to one combined approach, the method set forth above may be used to obtain the offset via analysis of the subaperture images. The offset may then be used as an endpoint or midpoint for a focus sweep of the main lens. In the course of the focus sweep, a plurality of intermediate focus settings may be used to capture intermediate light-field data. For each intermediate light-field data, a contrast level may be computed. The contrast levels may be compared to identify an optimal intermediate focus setting at which the contrast level is the highest. This intermediate focus setting may be used to refocus the main lens prior to image capture.
The accompanying drawings depict several embodiments. Together with the description, they serve to explain the principles of the embodiments. One skilled in the art will recognize that the particular embodiments depicted in the drawings are merely exemplary, and are not intended to limit scope.
For purposes of the description provided herein, the following definitions are used:
In addition, for ease of nomenclature, the term “camera” is used herein to refer to an image capture device or other data acquisition device. Such a data acquisition device can be any device or system for acquiring, recording, measuring, estimating, determining and/or computing data representative of a scene, including but not limited to two-dimensional image data, three-dimensional image data, and/or light-field data. Such a data acquisition device may include optics, sensors, and image processing electronics for acquiring data representative of a scene, using techniques that are well known in the art. One skilled in the art will recognize that many types of data acquisition devices can be used in connection with the present disclosure, and that the disclosure is not limited to cameras. Thus, the use of the term “camera” herein is intended to be illustrative and exemplary, but should not be considered to limit the scope of the disclosure. Specifically, any use of such term herein should be considered to refer to any suitable device for acquiring image data.
In the following description, several techniques and methods for processing light-field images are described. One skilled in the art will recognize that these various techniques and methods can be performed singly and/or in any suitable combination with one another.
Architecture
In at least one embodiment, the system and method described herein can be implemented in connection with light-field images captured by light-field capture devices including but not limited to those described in Ng et al., Light-field photography with a hand-held plenoptic capture device, Technical Report CSTR 2005-02, Stanford Computer Science. Referring now to
In at least one embodiment, camera 200 may be a light-field camera that includes light-field image data acquisition device 209 having optics 201, image sensor 203 (including a plurality of individual sensors for capturing pixels), and microlens array 202. Optics 201 may include, for example, aperture 212 for allowing a selectable amount of light into camera 200, and main lens 213 for focusing light toward microlens array 202. In at least one embodiment, microlens array 202 may be disposed and/or incorporated in the optical path of camera 200 (between main lens 213 and image sensor 203) so as to facilitate acquisition, capture, sampling of, recording, and/or obtaining light-field image data via image sensor 203. Referring now also to
In at least one embodiment, camera 200 may also include a user interface 205 for allowing a user to provide input for controlling the operation of camera 200 for capturing, acquiring, storing, and/or processing image data. The user interface 205 may receive user input from the user via an input device 206, which may include any one or more user input mechanisms known in the art. For example, the input device 206 may include one or more buttons, switches, touch screens, gesture interpretation devices, pointing devices, and/or the like.
Similarly, in at least one embodiment, post-processing system 300 may include a user interface 305 that allows the user to initiate processing, viewing, and/or other output of light-field images. The user interface 305 may additionally or alternatively facilitate the receipt of user input from the user to establish one or more parameters of subsequent image processing.
In at least one embodiment, camera 200 may also include control circuitry 210 for facilitating acquisition, sampling, recording, and/or obtaining light-field image data. For example, control circuitry 210 may manage and/or control (automatically or in response to user input) the acquisition timing, rate of acquisition, sampling, capturing, recording, and/or obtaining of light-field image data.
In at least one embodiment, camera 200 may include memory 211 for storing image data, such as output by image sensor 203. Such memory 211 can include external and/or internal memory. In at least one embodiment, memory 211 can be provided at a separate device and/or location from camera 200.
For example, camera 200 may store raw light-field image data, as output by image sensor 203, and/or a representation thereof, such as a compressed image data file. In addition, as described in related U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 12/703,367 for “Light-field Camera Image, File and Configuration Data, and Method of Using, Storing and Communicating Same,” filed Feb. 10, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, memory 211 can also store data representing the characteristics, parameters, and/or configurations (collectively “configuration data”) of device 209. The configuration data may include light-field image capture parameters such as zoom and focus settings.
In at least one embodiment, captured image data is provided to post-processing circuitry 204. The post-processing circuitry 204 may be disposed in or integrated into light-field image data acquisition device 209, as shown in
Such a separate component may include any of a wide variety of computing devices, including but not limited to computers, smartphones, tablets, cameras, and/or any other device that processes digital information. Such a separate component may include additional features such as a user input 215 and/or a display screen 216. If desired, light-field image data may be displayed for the user on the display screen 216.
Light-Field Imaging Overview
Light-field images often include a plurality of projections (which may be circular or of other shapes) of aperture 212 of camera 200, each projection taken from a different vantage point on the camera's focal plane. The light-field image may be captured on image sensor 203. The interposition of microlens array 202 between main lens 213 and image sensor 203 causes images of aperture 212 to be formed on image sensor 203, each microlens in microlens array 202 projecting a small image of main-lens aperture 212 onto image sensor 203. These aperture-shaped projections are referred to herein as disks, although they need not be circular in shape. The term “disk” is not intended to be limited to a circular region, but can refer to a region of any shape.
Light-field images include four dimensions of information describing light rays impinging on the focal plane of camera 200 (or other capture device). Two spatial dimensions (herein referred to as x and y) are represented by the disks themselves. For example, the spatial resolution of a light-field image with 120,000 disks, arranged in a Cartesian pattern 400 wide and 300 high, is 400×300. Two angular dimensions (herein referred to as u and v) are represented as the pixels within an individual disk. For example, the angular resolution of a light-field image with 100 pixels within each disk, arranged as a 10×10 Cartesian pattern, is 10×10. This light-field image has a 4-D (x, y, u, v) resolution of (400, 300, 10, 10). Referring now to
In at least one embodiment, the 4-D light-field representation may be reduced to a 2-D image through a process of projection and reconstruction. As described in more detail in related U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 13/774,971 for “Compensating for Variation in Microlens Position During Light Field Image Processing,” filed Feb. 22, 2013 and issued on Sep. 9, 2014 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,831,377, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, a virtual surface of projection may be introduced, and the intersections of representative rays with the virtual surface can be computed. The color of each representative ray may be taken to be equal to the color of its corresponding pixel.
Any number of image processing techniques can be used to reduce color artifacts, reduce projection artifacts, increase dynamic range, and/or otherwise improve image quality. Examples of such techniques, including for example modulation, demodulation, and demosaicing, are described in related U.S. application Ser. No. 13/774,925 for “Compensating for Sensor Saturation and Microlens Modulation During Light Field Image Processing” filed Feb. 22, 2013 and issued on Feb. 3, 2015 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,948,545, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Autofocus in Light-Field Cameras
In order to overcome the problems referenced above with conventional autofocus systems and methods, the light-field camera architecture described above may be used to implement a variety of autofocus techniques. In some embodiments, such techniques may be implemented without the need for any additional sensors and/or optical pathways.
In some implementations, a phase detection method may be employed. This may be done at only one focus point within the imaging area of the camera 200, or alternatively, at each of multiple focus points. One exemplary method involving phase detection will be shown and described in connection with
Phase Detection Autofocus
Referring to
The method may start 500 with a step 510 in which light is received in the camera 200. This may be done, for example, by opening the aperture 212 to permit the light to enter the interior of the camera 200. In step 520, the light may be directed along an optical pathway within the camera 200. This may be done through the use of one or more optical elements, which may include, but are not limited to, the main lens 213, the microlens array 202, and one or more mirrors and/or prisms (not shown). The optical pathway may be straight, as illustrated in
In step 530, the light may be captured, for example, by the image sensor 203, to generate preliminary light-field data representative of the light captured. The camera 200 may not necessarily be in focus during performance of step 530. Thus, the preliminary light-field data may not be properly focused.
In step 540, the preliminary light-field data may be used to generate an offset by which the focus of the camera 200 is to be adjusted to bring newly-captured light-field data, of the same scene as that imaged by the preliminary light-field data, into or toward proper focus. The offset may be a vector indicating the magnitude and direction that the focus setting of the camera 200 should be changed in order to focus the camera 200. In some embodiments, the offset may be a positive or negative number that indicates a change in the distance from the camera 200 at which the main lens 213 is focused. Alternatively, the offset may be a positive or negative number that indicates a change in position of one or more components of the main lens 213, which may be automatically movable via a motor or other mechanism (not shown) in response to determination of the offset.
The method of
In some embodiments, a confidence factor may be calculated as part of step 540 as the offset is determined. The confidence factor may indicate a degree of confidence in the accuracy of the offset. For example, if step 540 involves the comparison of multiple subaperture images, the offset may be determined by combining the focus offsets calculated between different pairs of the subaperture images. Such a combination may be made, for example, by averaging the focus offsets to obtain the offset. A standard deviation or other metric may be calculated to indicate the magnitude of variability present in the focus offsets. Such a metric may be used to obtain the confidence factor.
In some examples, a high confidence factor may indicate high confidence that application of the offset will bring the camera 200 into proper focus. Conversely, a low confidence factor may indicate relatively low confidence that application of the offset will properly focus the camera 200. If desired, the magnitude of the confidence factor may be taken into account in query 550, for example, in addition to or in the alternative to the magnitude of the offset. In some embodiments, query 550 may employ a formula based on the magnitude offset and that of the confidence factor. For example, a focus score or other metric may be calculated based on the offset and the confidence factor, with a small offset and a high confidence factor leading to a higher focus score. Query 550 may determine that the camera 200 is in proper focus when the focus score exceeds a threshold value.
If query 550 is answered in the negative, the method may proceed to a step 560 in which the offset is used to refocus the main lens 213 of the camera 200. As indicated previously, the offset may specify the desired motion of one or more components of the main lens 213, or may indicate a focus depth that is to be obtained for the camera 200, or the like. A motor (not shown) or other actuation device may move the main lens 213 in the manner specified by the offset.
After the offset has been applied, the camera 200 may be focused at a new setting, which may be used in the reiteration of step 510, step 520, step 530, step 540, and query 550. Reiteration of step 540 may result in generation of a new offset based on the new preliminary light-field data generated in step 530.
Once query 550 is answered in the affirmative, the camera 200 is deemed to be in focus, and the method may end 590. The camera 200 may then capture additional light to generate new light-field data at the current focus setting. This light-field data may be used to generate the desired light-field image. In the alternative, after termination of the method, the most recent preliminary light-field data captured by the camera 200, and used to calculate the most recent offset, may be recorded and used to generate the desired light-field image.
Step 540 of generating the offset may be performed in a wide variety of ways. In some embodiments, a phase detection algorithm may be used. One example of how step 540 may be carried out will be shown and described in connection with
Referring now to
Step 540 may start 600 with a step 610 in which a plurality of subaperture images are generated based on the preliminary light-field data generated in step 530. Each subaperture image may be generated by taking pixels from the same location on each microlens of the microlens array 202 of the camera 200, and combining them into a two-dimensional image. The subaperture images may advantageously be generated based on pixel locations that are near the center of each microlens of the microlens array 202, and are relatively close to each other. In some embodiments, the subaperture images may be generated based on a pattern, for example, with a central subaperture image surrounded by a plurality of peripheral subaperture images, as will be shown and further described in the example.
In step 620, the subaperture images generated in step 610 may be cropped to facilitate further analysis. The subaperture images may be cropped in such a manner that the same portion (for example, a rectangular portion bounded by the same two-dimensional Cartesian coordinates) of each of the subaperture images is kept. Thus, a plurality of cropped subaperture images may be obtained.
In step 630, one or more features common to each of the cropped subaperture images may be identified. These features may be selected to be readily identifiable via an identification algorithm. Thus, the features may consist of high intensity points, low intensity points, high contrast areas (for example, the lines produced by the edges of objects), and/or the like. The same feature(s) may be identified within each of the cropped subaperture images.
In step 640, the relative positions of the feature(s) identified in step 630 may be ascertained and compared. These positions may, for example, be the Cartesian coordinates at which the feature is located in each cropped subaperture image. The differences between these positions, for adjacent pairs of cropped subaperture images, may be calculated to yield a series of focus offsets between pairs of images.
As indicated previously, the subaperture images may include a central subaperture image surrounded by peripheral subaperture images. Thus, the cropped subaperture images may be arranged with a central cropped subaperture image surrounded by peripheral cropped subaperture images. The focus offset of each cropped peripheral subaperture image, relative to the central cropped subaperture image, may be determined via comparison of the feature positions, as described above. This may yield a focus offset of each peripheral cropped subaperture image, relative to the central cropped subaperture image.
In step 650, the offset may be generated. In some embodiments, the offset may be computed by combining the focus offsets obtained in step 640, as described previously. In some examples, the focus offsets may be averaged or combined through the use of a different algorithm to yield the offset. In some embodiments, a confidence factor may also be generated, as described above. Step 540 may then end 690.
In addition to or in the alternative to the method of
An epipolar image may be an image of a single line across a body of light-field data, which may provide an (x,v) plot of the data. In an epipolar image, the presence of vertical lines may indicate proper focus. Thus, a preponderance of the vertical lines in an epipolar image may be used to assess the focus level of the camera 200 at the location at which the epipolar image was taken. If desired, multiple epipolar images may be generated across various portions of light-field data to provide multiple focus points.
Phase Detection and Contrast Detection Autofocus
In some embodiments, autofocus may be carried out using the architecture of a light-field camera, such as the light-field camera 200, using both phase detection and contrast detection. In some methods, phase detection may be used to help define the range of a focus sweep that is to be used in contrast detection. Contrast detection may then be used to obtain the offset to be applied to the main lens 213 of the camera 200.
Referring now to
As shown, the method of
In step 710, the main lens 213 of the camera 200 may be focused through the sweep. This may entail gradually refocusing the main lens 213 through an incrementally-changing focus setting. As indicated previously, the focus setting of the main lens 213 may be automatically changed through the use of a motor or other actuator (not shown). Such an actuator may be used to refocus the main lens 213 through the desired range of focus settings, at the desired speed.
In step 720, intermediate light-field data may be captured at each of a plurality of intermediate focus settings within the focus sweep. In some examples, the focus sweep may be divided into a number of evenly-spaced increments, and the image sensor 203 of the camera 200 may capture intermediate light-field data at each of the increments.
In step 730, the contrast level may be computed for each package of intermediate light-field data captured in step 720. The contrast level may be computed via any of a variety of algorithms known in the art. A higher contrast level may indicate better focus.
In step 740, the contrast levels of the packages of intermediate light-field data computed in step 730 may be compared with each other until the intermediate light-field data with the highest contrast level has been identified. The focus setting used to capture the intermediate light-field data with the highest contrast setting may be identified as the optimal intermediate focus setting.
In some embodiments, this comparison may be carried out continuously as the intermediate light-field data is generated. For example, each time new intermediate light-field data is generated, its contrast level may be computed and compared with that of the intermediate light-field data generated immediately prior to it. If the contrast level of the new intermediate light-field data is higher, generation of intermediate light-field data may continue through the focus sweep until the contrast level of the new intermediate light-field data drops, by comparison with that of the intermediate light-field data generated immediately prior to it. When the contrast level begins to drop, it may be recognized that the focus sweep has moved through the optimal focus setting. The focus setting of the intermediate light-field data with the highest contrast level (for example, the intermediate light-field data captured immediately prior to reduction in the contrast level) may be identified as the optimal intermediate focus setting.
In step 750, the main lens 213 of the camera 200 may be refocused at the optimal intermediate focus setting identified in step 740. As shown, the method may then return to step 510, at which further phase detection may be carried out to determine, via query 550, whether the camera 200 is properly focused. If proper focus has not been achieved, the offset determined by phase detection may be applied in step 560, and contrast detection may be carried out again with a new focus sweep.
In alternative embodiments, after performance of step 750, further contrast detection may be carried out directly. Thus, for example, rather than returning to step 510, the method may return to step 710 for further contrast detection.
In some embodiments, a query similar to query 550 may be used to determine, based on results of the contrast detection, whether the camera 200 has been properly focused. This query may be carried out, for example, after the optimal intermediate focus setting has been identified in step 740. For example, if the contrast level of the intermediate light-field data generated at the optimal intermediate focus setting is below a threshold contrast level, it may be determined that the camera 200 is properly focused, and no further autofocus steps are needed. Thus, if the query is answered in the affirmative, the method may end 590.
Those of skill in the art will recognize that the methods of
The performance of the methods of
Referring now to
Referring now to
The subaperture images may include a first subaperture image 900, a second subaperture image 920, a third subaperture image 940, a fourth subaperture image 960, and a fifth subaperture image 980. Each of the subaperture images may be generated by combining the pixels at the same location on each microlens of the microlens array 202 of the camera 200. The subaperture images may be displaced from each other, for example, so that one of the subaperture images is a center subaperture image, and each of the other subaperture images is displaced slightly from the center subaperture image, either toward the right, toward the left, toward the top, or toward the bottom.
Referring now to
As also shown in
With the main lens 213 of the camera 200 in proper focus, the cropped subaperture images of
Referring now to
The focus offsets shown may indicate that, in order to align with the central cropped subaperture image 1000, the left cropped subaperture image 1020 would need to move 2.8 pixels to the right, the right cropped subaperture image 1040 would need to move 3.1 pixels to the left, the top cropped subaperture image 1060 would need to move 3.0 pixels downward, and the bottom cropped subaperture image 1080 would need to move 2.9 pixels upward. These focus offsets all specify motion toward the central cropped subaperture image 1000, and thus may all entail focusing the main lens 213 of the camera 200 in the same direction, albeit with slightly varying magnitudes.
The focus offsets may be combined, for example, via averaging, to yield the offset to be applied to the main lens 213. The average value of the focus offsets is 2.95 pixels, and the direction of the offset may be determined by the directions of the focus offsets (i.e., either toward or away from the central cropped subaperture image 1000). Thus, it may be expected that applying the offset to refocus the main lens 213 may bring the camera into proper focus, at least relative to the focus point 810 shown in
Notably, different focus settings may be needed to bring different portions of an image into focus. Thus, if a different focus point (not shown) in the preliminary light-field image 800 is selected, the methods of
The above description and referenced drawings set forth particular details with respect to possible embodiments. Those of skill in the art will appreciate that the techniques described herein may be practiced in other embodiments. First, the particular naming of the components, capitalization of terms, the attributes, data structures, or any other programming or structural aspect is not mandatory or significant, and the mechanisms that implement the techniques described herein may have different names, formats, or protocols. Further, the system may be implemented via a combination of hardware and software, as described, or entirely in hardware elements, or entirely in software elements. Also, the particular division of functionality between the various system components described herein is merely exemplary, and not mandatory; functions performed by a single system component may instead be performed by multiple components, and functions performed by multiple components may instead be performed by a single component.
Reference in the specification to “one embodiment” or to “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiments is included in at least one embodiment. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment.
Some embodiments may include a system or a method for performing the above-described techniques, either singly or in any combination. Other embodiments may include a computer program product comprising a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium and computer program code, encoded on the medium, for causing a processor in a computing device or other electronic device to perform the above-described techniques.
Some portions of the above are presented in terms of algorithms and symbolic representations of operations on data bits within a memory of a computing device. These algorithmic descriptions and representations are the means used by those skilled in the data processing arts to most effectively convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art. An algorithm is here, and generally, conceived to be a self-consistent sequence of steps (instructions) leading to a desired result. The steps are those requiring physical manipulations of physical quantities. Usually, though not necessarily, these quantities take the form of electrical, magnetic or optical signals capable of being stored, transferred, combined, compared and otherwise manipulated. It is convenient at times, principally for reasons of common usage, to refer to these signals as bits, values, elements, symbols, characters, terms, numbers, or the like. Furthermore, it is also convenient at times, to refer to certain arrangements of steps requiring physical manipulations of physical quantities as modules or code devices, without loss of generality.
It should be borne in mind, however, that all of these and similar terms are to be associated with the appropriate physical quantities and are merely convenient labels applied to these quantities. Unless specifically stated otherwise as apparent from the following discussion, it is appreciated that throughout the description, discussions utilizing terms such as “processing” or “computing” or “calculating” or “displaying” or “determining” or the like, refer to the action and processes of a computer system, or similar electronic computing module and/or device, that manipulates and transforms data represented as physical (electronic) quantities within the computer system memories or registers or other such information storage, transmission or display devices.
Certain aspects include process steps and instructions described herein in the form of an algorithm. It should be noted that the process steps and instructions of described herein can be embodied in software, firmware and/or hardware, and when embodied in software, can be downloaded to reside on and be operated from different platforms used by a variety of operating systems.
Some embodiments relate to an apparatus for performing the operations described herein. This apparatus may be specially constructed for the required purposes, or it may comprise a general-purpose computing device selectively activated or reconfigured by a computer program stored in the computing device. Such a computer program may be stored in a computer readable storage medium, such as, but is not limited to, any type of disk including floppy disks, optical disks, CD-ROMs, magnetic-optical disks, read-only memories (ROMs), random access memories (RAMs), EPROMs, EEPROMs, flash memory, solid state drives, magnetic or optical cards, application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), and/or any type of media suitable for storing electronic instructions, and each coupled to a computer system bus. Further, the computing devices referred to herein may include a single processor or may be architectures employing multiple processor designs for increased computing capability.
The algorithms and displays presented herein are not inherently related to any particular computing device, virtualized system, or other apparatus. Various general-purpose systems may also be used with programs in accordance with the teachings herein, or it may prove convenient to construct more specialized apparatus to perform the required method steps. The required structure for a variety of these systems will be apparent from the description provided herein. In addition, the techniques set forth herein are not described with reference to any particular programming language. It will be appreciated that a variety of programming languages may be used to implement the techniques described herein, and any references above to specific languages are provided for illustrative purposes only.
Accordingly, in various embodiments, the techniques described herein can be implemented as software, hardware, and/or other elements for controlling a computer system, computing device, or other electronic device, or any combination or plurality thereof. Such an electronic device can include, for example, a processor, an input device (such as a keyboard, mouse, touchpad, trackpad, joystick, trackball, microphone, and/or any combination thereof), an output device (such as a screen, speaker, and/or the like), memory, long-term storage (such as magnetic storage, optical storage, and/or the like), and/or network connectivity, according to techniques that are well known in the art. Such an electronic device may be portable or nonportable. Examples of electronic devices that may be used for implementing the techniques described herein include: a mobile phone, personal digital assistant, smartphone, kiosk, server computer, enterprise computing device, desktop computer, laptop computer, tablet computer, consumer electronic device, television, set-top box, or the like. An electronic device for implementing the techniques described herein may use any operating system such as, for example: Linux; Microsoft Windows, available from Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Wash.; Mac OS X, available from Apple Inc. of Cupertino, Calif.; iOS, available from Apple Inc. of Cupertino, Calif.; Android, available from Google, Inc. of Mountain View, Calif.; and/or any other operating system that is adapted for use on the device.
In various embodiments, the techniques described herein can be implemented in a distributed processing environment, networked computing environment, or web-based computing environment. Elements can be implemented on client computing devices, servers, routers, and/or other network or non-network components. In some embodiments, the techniques described herein are implemented using a client/server architecture, wherein some components are implemented on one or more client computing devices and other components are implemented on one or more servers. In one embodiment, in the course of implementing the techniques of the present disclosure, client(s) request content from server(s), and server(s) return content in response to the requests. A browser may be installed at the client computing device for enabling such requests and responses, and for providing a user interface by which the user can initiate and control such interactions and view the presented content.
Any or all of the network components for implementing the described technology may, in some embodiments, be communicatively coupled with one another using any suitable electronic network, whether wired or wireless or any combination thereof, and using any suitable protocols for enabling such communication. One example of such a network is the Internet, although the techniques described herein can be implemented using other networks as well.
While a limited number of embodiments has been described herein, those skilled in the art, having benefit of the above description, will appreciate that other embodiments may be devised which do not depart from the scope of the claims. In addition, it should be noted that the language used in the specification has been principally selected for readability and instructional purposes, and may not have been selected to delineate or circumscribe the inventive subject matter. Accordingly, the disclosure is intended to be illustrative, but not limiting.
The present application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 13/867,333 for “Light-field Based Autofocus”, filed on Apr. 22, 2013, which is incorporated herein by reference. The present application is also a related to U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 14/302,826 for “Depth Determination for Light Field Images”, filed on Jun. 12, 2014 and issued on Mar. 24, 2015 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,988,317, which is incorporated herein by reference. The present application is also related to U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 13/774,986 for “Light field Processing and Analysis, Camera Control, and User Interfaces and Interaction on Light field Capture Devices”, filed on Feb. 22, 2013 and issued on Mar. 31, 2015 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,995,785, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
725567 | Ives | Apr 1903 | A |
4383170 | Takagi et al. | May 1983 | A |
4661986 | Adelson | Apr 1987 | A |
4694185 | Weiss | Sep 1987 | A |
4920419 | Easterly | Apr 1990 | A |
5076687 | Adelson | Dec 1991 | A |
5077810 | D'Luna | Dec 1991 | A |
5251019 | Moorman et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5282045 | Mimura et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5499069 | Griffith | Mar 1996 | A |
5572034 | Karellas | Nov 1996 | A |
5610390 | Miyano | Mar 1997 | A |
5748371 | Cathey, Jr. et al. | May 1998 | A |
5757423 | Tanaka et al. | May 1998 | A |
5818525 | Elabd | Oct 1998 | A |
5835267 | Mason et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5907619 | Davis | May 1999 | A |
5949433 | Klotz | Sep 1999 | A |
5974215 | Bilbro et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6005936 | Shimizu et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6021241 | Bilbro et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6023523 | Cohen et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6028606 | Kolb et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6034690 | Gallery et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6061083 | Aritake et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061400 | Pearlstein et al. | May 2000 | A |
6069565 | Stern et al. | May 2000 | A |
6075889 | Hamilton, Jr. et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6091860 | Dimitri | Jul 2000 | A |
6097394 | Levoy et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6115556 | Reddington | Sep 2000 | A |
6137100 | Fossum et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6169285 | Pertrillo et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6201899 | Bergen | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6221687 | Abramovich | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6320979 | Melen | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6424351 | Bishop et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6448544 | Stanton et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6466207 | Gortler et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6476805 | Shum et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6479827 | Hamamoto et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6483535 | Tamburrino et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6529265 | Henningsen | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6577342 | Webster | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6587147 | Li | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6597859 | Leinhardt et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6606099 | Yamada | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6658168 | Kim | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6674430 | Kaufman et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6687419 | Atkin | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6768980 | Meyer et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6785667 | Orbanes et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6833865 | Fuller et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6842297 | Dowski, Jr. et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6900841 | Mihara | May 2005 | B1 |
6924841 | Jones | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6927922 | George et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7015954 | Foote et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7025515 | Woods | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7034866 | Colmenarez et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7079698 | Kobayashi | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7102666 | Kanade et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7164807 | Morton | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7206022 | Miller et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7239345 | Rogina | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7286295 | Sweatt et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7304670 | Hussey et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7329856 | Ma et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7336430 | George | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7417670 | Linzer et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7469381 | Ording | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7477304 | Hu | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7587109 | Reininger | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7620309 | Georgiev | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7623726 | Georgiev | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7633513 | Kondo et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7683951 | Aotsuka | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7687757 | Tseng et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7723662 | Levoy et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7724952 | Shum et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7748022 | Frazier | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7847825 | Aoki et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7936377 | Friedhoff et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7936392 | Ng et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7941634 | Georgi | May 2011 | B2 |
7945653 | Zuckerberg et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7949252 | Georgiev | May 2011 | B1 |
7982776 | Dunki-Jacobs et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8013904 | Tan et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8085391 | Machida et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8106856 | Matas et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8115814 | Iwase et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8155456 | Babacan | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8155478 | Vitsnudel et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8189089 | Georgiev et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8228417 | Georgiev et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8248515 | Ng et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8259198 | Cote et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8264546 | Witt | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8279325 | Pitts et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8289440 | Knight et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8290358 | Georgiev | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8310554 | Aggarwal et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8315476 | Georgiev et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8345144 | Georgiev et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8400533 | Szedo | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8400555 | Georgiev et al. | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8427548 | Lim | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8442397 | Kang et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8446516 | Pitts et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8494304 | Venable et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8531581 | Shroff | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8542933 | Venkataraman et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8577216 | Li et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8581998 | Ohno | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8589374 | Chaudhri | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8593564 | Border et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8605199 | Imai | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8614764 | Pitts et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8619082 | Ciurea et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8629930 | Brueckner et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8665440 | Kompaniets et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8675073 | Aagaard et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8724014 | Ng et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8736710 | Spielberg | May 2014 | B2 |
8736751 | Yun | May 2014 | B2 |
8749620 | Knight | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8750509 | Renkis | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8754829 | Lapstun | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8760566 | Pitts et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8768102 | Ng et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8797321 | Bertolami et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8811769 | Pitts et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8831377 | Pitts et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8860856 | Wetsztein et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8879901 | Caldwell et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8903232 | Caldwell | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8908058 | Akeley et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8948545 | Akeley et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8953882 | Lim et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8971625 | Pitts et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8976288 | Ng et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8988317 | Liang et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
8995785 | Knight et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8997021 | Liang et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9001226 | Ng et al. | Apr 2015 | B1 |
9013611 | Szedo | Apr 2015 | B1 |
9106914 | Doser | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9172853 | Pitts et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9184199 | Pitts et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9201193 | Smith | Dec 2015 | B1 |
9210391 | Mills | Dec 2015 | B1 |
9214013 | Venkataraman et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9294662 | Vondran, Jr. et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9300932 | Knight et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9305375 | Akeley | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9305956 | Pittes et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9386288 | Akeley et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9392153 | Myhre et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9419049 | Pitts et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9467607 | Ng et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9497380 | Jannard et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9607424 | Ng et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9628684 | Liang et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9635332 | Carroll et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9639945 | Oberheu et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9647150 | Blasco Claret | May 2017 | B2 |
9681069 | El-Ghoroury et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9774800 | El-Ghoroury et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9858649 | Liang et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9866810 | Knight et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9900510 | Karafin et al. | Feb 2018 | B1 |
9979909 | Kuang et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
20010048968 | Cox et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010053202 | Mazess et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020001395 | Davis et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020015048 | Nister | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020061131 | Sawhney | May 2002 | A1 |
20020109783 | Hayashi et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020159030 | Frey et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020199106 | Hayashi | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030081145 | Seaman et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030103670 | Schoelkopf et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030117511 | Belz et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030123700 | Wakao | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030133018 | Ziemkowski | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030147252 | Fioravanti | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030156077 | Balogh | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040002179 | Barton et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040012688 | Tinnerinno et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040012689 | Tinnerinno et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040101166 | Williams et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040114176 | Bodin et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040135780 | Nims | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040189686 | Tanguay et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040257360 | Sieckmann | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050031203 | Fukuda | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050049500 | Babu et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050052543 | Li et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050080602 | Snyder et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050162540 | Yata | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050212918 | Serra et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050276441 | Debevec | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060008265 | Ito | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060023066 | Li et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060050170 | Tanaka | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060056040 | Lan | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060056604 | Sylthe et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060072175 | Oshino | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060082879 | Miyoshi et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060130017 | Cohen et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060208259 | Jeon | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060248348 | Wakao et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060256226 | Alon et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060274210 | Kim | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060285741 | Subbarao | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070008317 | Lundstrom | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070019883 | Wong et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070030357 | Levien et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070033588 | Landsman | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070052810 | Monroe | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070071316 | Kubo | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070081081 | Cheng | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070097206 | Houvener | May 2007 | A1 |
20070103558 | Cai et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070113198 | Robertson et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070140676 | Nakahara | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070188613 | Norbori et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070201853 | Petschnigg | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070229653 | Matusik et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070230944 | Georgiev | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070252074 | Ng | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070269108 | Steinberg et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080007626 | Wernersson | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080012988 | Baharav et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080018668 | Yamauchi | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080031537 | Gutkowicz-Krusin et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080049113 | Hirai | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080056569 | Williams et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080122940 | Mori | May 2008 | A1 |
20080129728 | Satoshi | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080131019 | Ng | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080144952 | Chen et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080152215 | Horie et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080168404 | Ording | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080180792 | Georgiev | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080187305 | Raskar et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080193026 | Horie et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080205871 | Utagawa | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080226274 | Spielberg | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080232680 | Berestov et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080253652 | Gupta et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080260291 | Alakarhu et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080266688 | Errando Smet et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080277566 | Utagawa | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080309813 | Watanabe | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080316301 | Givon | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090027542 | Yamamoto et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090041381 | Georgiev et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090041448 | Georgiev et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090070710 | Kagaya | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090128658 | Hayasaka et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090128669 | Ng et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090135258 | Nozaki | May 2009 | A1 |
20090140131 | Utagawa | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090102956 | Georgiev | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090185051 | Sano | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090185801 | Georgiev et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090190022 | Ichimura | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090190024 | Hayasaka et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090195689 | Hwang et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090202235 | Li | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090204813 | Kwan | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090273843 | Raskar et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090295829 | Georgiev et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090309973 | Kogane | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090310885 | Tamaru | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090321861 | Oliver et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100003024 | Agrawal et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100021001 | Honsinger et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100026852 | Ng et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100050120 | Ohazama et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100060727 | Steinberg et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100097444 | Lablans | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100103311 | Makii | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100107068 | Butcher et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100111489 | Presler | May 2010 | A1 |
20100123784 | Ding et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100128145 | Pitts et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100129048 | Pitts et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100141780 | Tan et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100142839 | Lakus-Becker | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100201789 | Yahagi | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100253782 | Elazary | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100265385 | Knight et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100277629 | Tanaka | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100303288 | Malone | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100328485 | Imamura et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110001858 | Shintani | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110018903 | Lapstun et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110019056 | Hirsch et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110025827 | Shpunt et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110050864 | Bond | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110050909 | Ellenby | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110069175 | Mistretta et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110075729 | Dane et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110090255 | Wilson et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110091192 | Iwane | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110123183 | Adelsberger et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110129120 | Chan | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110129165 | Lim et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110148764 | Gao | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110149074 | Lee et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110169994 | DiFrancesco et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110205384 | Zamowski et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110221947 | Awazu | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110242334 | Wilburn et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110242352 | Hikosaka | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110261164 | Olesen et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110261205 | Sun | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110267263 | Hinckley | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110273466 | Imai et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110133649 | Bales et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110292258 | Adler | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110298960 | Tan et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110304745 | Wang et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110311046 | Oka | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110316968 | Taguchi et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120014837 | Fehr et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120050562 | Perwass et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120056889 | Carter et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120057040 | Park et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120057806 | Backlund et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120062755 | Takahashi et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120132803 | Hirato et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120133746 | Bigioi et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120147205 | Lelescu et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120176481 | Lukk et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120188344 | Imai | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120201475 | Carmel et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120206574 | Shikata et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120218463 | Benezra et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120224787 | Imai | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120229691 | Hiasa et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120249529 | Matsumoto et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120249550 | Akeley | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120249819 | Imai | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120251131 | Henderson et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120257065 | Velarde | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120257795 | Kim et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120272271 | Nishizawa et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120287246 | Katayama | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120287296 | Fukui | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120287329 | Yahata | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120293075 | Engelen et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120300091 | Shroff et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120237222 | Ng et al. | Dec 2012 | A9 |
20120327222 | Ng et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130002902 | Ito | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130002936 | Hirama et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130021486 | Richardson | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130038696 | Ding et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130041215 | McDowall | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130044290 | Kawamura | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130050546 | Kano | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130064453 | Nagasaka | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130064532 | Caldwell et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130070059 | Kushida | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130070060 | Chatterjee et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130077880 | Venkataraman et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130082905 | Ranieri et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130088616 | Ingrassia, Jr. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130093844 | Shuto | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130093859 | Nakamura | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130094101 | Oguchi | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130107085 | Ng et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130113981 | Knight et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130120356 | Georgiev et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130120605 | Georgiev et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130120636 | Baer | May 2013 | A1 |
20130127901 | Georgiev et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130128052 | Catrein et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130128081 | Georgiev et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130128087 | Georgiev et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130135448 | Nagumo et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130176481 | Holmes et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130188068 | Said | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130215108 | McMahon et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130215226 | Chauvier et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130222656 | Kaneko | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130234935 | Griffith | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130242137 | Kirkland | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130258451 | El-Ghoroury et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130262511 | Kuffner et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130286236 | Mankowski | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130321574 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130321581 | El-Ghoroury | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130321677 | Cote et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130329107 | Burley et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130329132 | Tico et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130335596 | Demandoix et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130342700 | Kass | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140002502 | Han | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140002699 | Guan | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140003719 | Bai et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140013273 | Ng | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140035959 | Lapstun | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140037280 | Shirakawa | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140049663 | Ng et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140059462 | Wernersson | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140085282 | Luebke et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140092424 | Grosz | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140098191 | Rime et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140132741 | Aagaard et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140133749 | Kuo et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140139538 | Barber et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140167196 | Heimgartner et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140168484 | Suzuki | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140176540 | Tosic et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140176592 | Wilburn | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140176710 | Brady | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140177905 | Grefalda | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140184885 | Tanaka et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140192208 | Okincha | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140193047 | Grosz | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140195921 | Grosz | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140204111 | Vaidyanathan et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140211077 | Ng et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140218540 | Geiss et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140226038 | Kimura | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140240463 | Pitts et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140267243 | Venkataraman et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140267639 | Tatsuta | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140300753 | Yin | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140313350 | Keelan | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140313375 | Milnar | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140340390 | Lanman et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140347540 | Kang | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140354863 | Ahn et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140368494 | Sakharnykh et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140368640 | Strandemar | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150062178 | Matas et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150062386 | Sugawara | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150092071 | Meng et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150097985 | Akeley | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150130986 | Ohnishi | May 2015 | A1 |
20150193937 | Georgiev et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150206340 | Munkberg et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150207990 | Ford et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150237273 | Sawadaishi | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150104101 | Bryant et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150288867 | Kajimura | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150304544 | Eguchi | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150310592 | Kano | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150312553 | Ng et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150312593 | Akeley et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150370011 | Ishihara | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150370012 | Ishihara | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160029017 | Liang | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160142615 | Liang | May 2016 | A1 |
20160155215 | Suzuki | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160165206 | Huang | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160173844 | Knight et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160191823 | El-Ghoroury | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160253837 | Zhu et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160307368 | Akeley | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160307372 | Pitts et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160309065 | Karafin et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160353006 | Andersen | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160353026 | Blonde et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160381348 | Hayasaka | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170031146 | Zheng | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170059305 | Nonn et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170067832 | Ferrara, Jr. et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170078578 | Sato | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170094906 | Liang et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170134639 | Pitts et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170139131 | Karafin et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170237971 | Pitts et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170243373 | Bevensee et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170244948 | Pang et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170256036 | Song et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170263012 | Sabater et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170302903 | Ng et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170358092 | Bleibel et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170365068 | Tan et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180007253 | Abe | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180012397 | Carothers | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180020204 | Pang et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180033209 | Akeley et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180034134 | Pang et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180070066 | Knight et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180070067 | Knight et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180082405 | Liang | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180089903 | Pang et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180097867 | Pang et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180158198 | Kamad | Jun 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101226292 | Jul 2008 | CN |
101309359 | Nov 2008 | CN |
19624421 | Jan 1997 | DE |
2010020100 | Jan 2010 | JP |
2011135170 | Jul 2011 | JP |
2003052465 | Jun 2003 | WO |
06039486 | Apr 2006 | WO |
06129677 | Dec 2006 | WO |
07092545 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2007092581 | Aug 2007 | WO |
2011010234 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2011029209 | Mar 2011 | WO |
2011081187 | Jul 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Haeberli, “A Multifocus Method for Controlling Depth of Field” GRAPHICA Obscura, 1994, pp. 1-3. |
Levoy, M., “Autofocus: Contrast Detection”, http://graphics.stanford.edu/courses/cs178/applets/autofocusPD.html, pp. 1-3, 2010. |
Levoy, Marc, “Autofocus: Phase Detection”, http://graphics.stanford.edu/courses/cs178/applets/autofocusPD.html, pp. 1-3, 2010. |
Nayar, Shree, et al., “Shape from Focus”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 16, No. 8, pp. 824-831, Aug. 1994. |
Ng, R., et al. “Light Field Photography with a Hand-held Plenoptic Camera,” Stanford Technical Report, CSTR 2005-2, 2005. |
Ng, R., “Digital Light Field Photography,” Dissertation, Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Jun. 2006. |
Raskar, Ramesh et al., “Non-photorealistic Camera: Depth Edge Detection and Stylized Rendering using Multi-Flash Imaging”, SIGGRAPH 2004. |
Stensvold, M., “Hybrid AF: A New Approach to Autofocus Is Emerging for both Still and Video”, Digital Photo Magazine, Nov. 13, 2012. |
Tao, Michael, et al., “Depth from Combining Defocus and Correspondence Using Light-Field Cameras”, Dec. 2013. |
Autofocus systems and methods (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autofocus). Retrieved Jan. 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/967,076, filed Apr. 30, 2018 listing Jiantao Kuang et al. as inventors, entitled “Automatic Lens Flare Detection and Correction for Light-Field Images”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/666,298, filed Aug. 1, 2017 listing Yonggang Ha et al. as inventors, entitled “Focal Reducer With Controlled Optical Properties for Interchangeable Lens Light-Field Camera”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,808, filed May 9, 2017 listing Alex Song et al. as inventors, entitled “Adaptive Control for Immersive Experience Delivery”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/864,938, filed Jan. 8, 2018 listing Jon Karafin et al. as inventors, entitled “Motion Blur for Light-Field Images”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/703,553, filed Sep. 13, 2017 listing Jon Karafin et al. as inventors, entitled “4D Camera Tracking and Optical Stabilization”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,841, filed May 9, 2017 listing Kurt Akeley et al. as inventors, entitled “Vantage Generation and Interactive Playback”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/590,951, filed May 9, 2017 listing Alex Song et al. as inventors, entitled “Wedge-Based Light-Field Video Capture”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/944,551, filed Apr. 3, 2018 listing Zejing Wang et al. as inventors, entitled “Generating Dolly Zoom Effect Using Light Field Image Data”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/874,723, filed Jan. 18, 2018 listing Mark Weir et al. as inventors, entitled “Multi-Camera Navigation Interface”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/897,994, filed Feb. 15, 2018 listing Trevor Carothers et al. as inventors, entitled “Generation of Virtual Reality With 6 Degrees of Freesom From Limited Viewer Data”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/605,037, filed May 25, 2017 listing Zejing Wang et al. as inventors, entitled “Multi-View Back-Projection to a Light-Field”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/897,836, filed Feb. 15, 2018 listing Francois Bleibel et al. as inventors, entitled “Multi-View Contour Tracking”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/897,942, filed Feb. 15, 2018 listing Francois Bleibel et al. as inventors, entitled “Multi-View Contour Tracking with Grabcut”. |
Adelsberger, R. et al., “Spatially Adaptive Photographic Flash,” ETH Zurich, Department of Computer Science, Technical Report 612, 2008, pp. 1-12. |
Adelson et al., “Single Lens Stereo with a Plenoptic Camera” IEEE Translation on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Feb. 1992. vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 99-106. |
Adelson, E. H., and Bergen, J. R. 1991. The plenoptic function and the elements of early vision. In Computational Models of Visual Processing, edited by Michael S. Landy and J. Anthony Movshon. Cambridge, Mass.: mit Press. |
Adobe Systems Inc, “XMP Specification”, Sep. 2005. |
Adobe, “Photoshop CS6 / in depth: Digital Negative (DNG)”, http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop/extend.displayTab2html. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Agarwala, A., et al., “Interactive Digital Photomontage,” ACM Transactions on Graphics, Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2004, vol. 32, No. 3, 2004. |
Andreas Observatory, Spectrograph Manual: IV. Flat-Field Correction, Jul. 2006. |
Apple, “Apple iPad: Photo Features on the iPad”, Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Bae, S., et al., “Defocus Magnification”, Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 26, Issue 3 (Proc. Of Eurographics 2007), pp. 1-9. |
Belhumeur, Peter et al., “The Bas-Relief Ambiguity”, International Journal of Computer Vision, 1997, pp. 1060-1066. |
Belhumeur, Peter, et al., “The Bas-Relief Ambiguity”, International Journal of Computer Vision, 1999, pp. 33-44, revised version. |
Bhat, P. et al. “GradientShop: A Gradient-Domain Optimization Framework for Image and Video Filtering,” SIGGRAPH 2010; 14 pages. |
Bolles, R., et al., “Epipolar-Plane Image Analysis: An Approach to Determining Structure from Motion”, International Journal of Computer Vision, 1, 7-55 (1987). |
Bourke, Paul, “Image filtering in the Frequency Domain,” pp. 1-9, Jun. 1998. |
Canon, Canon Speedlite wireless flash system, User manual for Model 550EX, Sep. 1998. |
Chai, Jin-Xang et al., “Plenoptic Sampling”, ACM SIGGRAPH 2000, Annual Conference Series, 2000, pp. 307-318. |
Chen, S. et al., “A CMOS Image Sensor with On-Chip Image Compression Based on Predictive Boundary Adaptation and Memoryless QTD Algorithm,” Very Large Scalee Integration (VLSI) Systems, IEEE Transactions, vol. 19, Issue 4; Apr. 2011. |
Chen, W., et al., “Light Field mapping: Efficient representation and hardware rendering of surface light fields”, ACM Transactions on Graphics 21, 3, 447-456, 2002. |
Cohen, Noy et al., “Enhancing the performance of the light field microscope using wavefront coding,” Optics Express, vol. 22, issue 20; 2014. |
Daly, D., “Microlens Arrays” Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Debevec, et al, “A Lighting Reproduction Approach to Live-Action Compoisting” Proceedings SIGGRAPH 2002. |
Debevec, P., et al., “Acquiring the reflectance field of a human face”, SIGGRAPH 2000. |
Debevec, P., et al., “Recovering high dynamic radiance maps from photographs”, SIGGRAPH 1997, 369-378. |
Design of the xBox menu. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Digital Photography Review, “Sony Announce new RGBE CCD,” Jul. 2003. |
Dorsey, J., et al., “Design and simulation of opera light and projection effects”, in Computer Graphics (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 91), vol. 25, 41-50. |
Dorsey, J., et al., “Interactive design of complex time dependent lighting”, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 15, 2 (Mar. 1995), 26-36. |
Dowski et al., “Wavefront coding: a modern method of achieving high performance and/or low cost imaging systems” SPIE Proceedings, vol. 3779, Jul. 1999, pp. 137-145. |
Dowski, Jr. “Extended Depth of Field Through Wave-Front Coding,” Applied Optics, vol. 34, No. 11, Apr. 10, 1995; pp. 1859-1866. |
Duparre, J. et al., “Micro-Optical Artificial Compound Eyes,” Institute of Physics Publishing, Apr. 2006. |
Eisemann, Elmar, et al., “Flash Photography Enhancement via Intrinsic Relighting”, SIGGRAPH 2004. |
Fattal, Raanan, et al., “Multiscale Shape and Detail Enhancement from Multi-light Image Collections”, SIGGRAPH 2007. |
Fernando, Randima, “Depth of Field—A Survey of Techniques,” GPU Gems. Boston, MA; Addison-Wesley, 2004. |
Fitzpatrick, Brad, “Camlistore”, Feb. 1, 2011. |
Fujifilm, Super CCD EXR Sensor by Fujifilm, brochure reference No. EB-807E, 2008. |
Georgiev, T. et al., “Reducing Plenoptic Camera Artifacts,” Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 1955-1968; 2010. |
Georgiev, T., et al., “Spatio-Angular Resolution Tradeoff in Integral Photography,” Proceedings of Eurographics Symposium on Rendering, 2006. |
Perez, Patrick et al., “Poisson Image Editing,” ACM Transactions on Graphics—Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2003; vol. 22, Issue 3; Jul. 2003; pp. 313-318. |
Petschnigg, George, et al., “Digial Photography with Flash and No-Flash Image Pairs”, SIGGRAPH 2004. |
Primesense, “The Primesense 3D Awareness Sensor”, 2007. |
Ramamoorthi, R., et al, “Frequency space environment map rendering” ACM Transactions on Graphics (SIGGRAPH 2002 proceedings) 21, 3, 517-526. |
Ramamoorthi, R., et al., “An efficient representation for irradiance environment maps”, in Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2001, 497-500. |
Raskar, Ramesh et al., “Glare Aware Photography: 4D Ray Sampling for Reducing Glare Effects of Camera Lenses,” ACM Transactions on Graphics—Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH, Aug. 2008; vol. 27, Issue 3; pp. 1-10. |
Raytrix, “Raytrix Lightfield Camera,” Raytrix GmbH, Germany 2012, pp. 1-35. |
Roper Scientific, Germany “Fiber Optics,” 2012. |
Scharstein, Daniel, et al., “High-Accuracy Stereo Depth Maps Using Structured Light,” CVPR'03 Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Computer Society, pp. 195-202. |
Schirmacher, H. et al., “High-Quality Interactive Lumigraph Rendering Through Warping,” May 2000, Graphics Interface 2000. |
Shade, Jonathan, et al., “Layered Depth Images”, SIGGRAPH 98, pp. 1-2. |
Shreiner, OpenGL Programming Guide, 7th edition, Chapter 8, 2010. |
Simpleviewer, “Tiltview”, http://simpleviewer.net/tiltviewer. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Skodras, A. et al., “The JPEG 2000 Still Image Compression Standard,” Sep. 2001, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, pp. 36-58. |
Sloan, P., et al., “Precomputed radiance transfer for real-time rendering in dynamic, low-frequency lighting environments”, ACM Transactions on Graphics 21, 3, 527-536, 2002. |
Snavely, Noah, et al., “Photo-tourism: Exploring Photo collections in 3D”, ACM Transactions on Graphics (SIGGRAPH Proceedings), 2006. |
Sokolov, “Autostereoscopy and Integral Photography by Professor Lippmann's Method”, 1911, pp. 23-29. |
Sony Corp, “Interchangeable Lens Digital Camera Handbook”, 2011. |
Sony, Sony's First Curved Sensor Photo: http://www.engadget.com; Jul. 2014. |
Story, D., “The Future of Photography”, Optics Electronics, Oct. 2008. |
Sun, Jian, et al., “Stereo Matching Using Belief Propagation”, 2002. |
Tagging photos on Flickr, Facebook and other online photo sharing sites (see, for example, http://support.gnip.com/customer/portal/articles/809309-flickr-geo-photos-tag-search). Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Takahashi, Keita, et al., “All in-focus View Synthesis from Under-Sampled Light Fields”, ICAT 2003, Tokyo, Japan. |
Tanida et al., “Thin observation module by bound optics (TOMBO): concept and experimental verification” Applied Optics 40, 11 (Apr. 10, 2001), pp. 1806-1813. |
Techcrunch, “Coolinis”, Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Teo, P., et al., “Efficient linear rendering for interactive light design”, Tech. Rep. STAN-CC-TN-97-60, 1998, Stanford University. |
Teranishi, N. “Evolution of Optical Structure in Images Sensors,” Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) 2012 IEEE International; Dec. 10-13, 2012. |
Vaish et al., “Using plane+parallax for calibrating dense camera arrays”, In Proceedings CVPR 2004, pp. 2-9. |
Vaish, V., et al., “Synthetic Aperture Focusing Using a Shear-Warp Factorization of the Viewing Transform,” Workshop on Advanced 3D Imaging for Safety and Security (in conjunction with CVPR 2005), 2005. |
VR Playhouse, “The Surrogate,” http://www.vrplayhouse.com/the-surrogate. |
Wanner, S. et al., “Globally Consistent Depth Labeling of 4D Light Fields,” IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2012. |
Wanner, S. et al., “Variational Light Field Analysis for Disparity Estimation and Super-Resolution,” IEEE Transacations on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intellegence, 2013. |
Wenger, et al, “Performance Relighting and Reflectance Transformation with Time-Multiplexed Illumination”, Institute for Creative Technologies, SIGGRAPH 2005. |
Wetzstein, Gordon, et al., “Sensor Saturation in Fourier Multiplexed Imaging”, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2010). |
Wikipedia—Adaptive Optics: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/adaptive_optics. Retrieved Feb. 2014. |
Wikipedia—Bayer Filter: http:/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayer_filter. Retrieved Jun. 20, 2013. |
Wikipedia—Color Image Pipeline: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/color_image_pipeline. Retrieved Jan. 15, 2014. |
Wikipedia—Compression standard JPEG XR: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPEG_XR. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Wikipedia—CYGM Filter: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CYGM _filter. Retrieved Jun. 20, 2013. |
Wikipedia—Data overlay techniques for real-time visual feed. For example, heads-up displays: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Head-up_display. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Wikipedia—Exchangeable image file format: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exchangeable_image_file_format. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Wikipedia—Expeed: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EXPEED. Retrieved Jan. 15, 2014. |
Wikipedia—Extensible Metadata Platform: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extensible_Metadata_Platform. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Wikipedia—Key framing for video animation: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Key_frame. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Wikipedia—Lazy loading of image data: http://en.wikipedia.orgiwiki/Lazy_loading. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Wikipedia—Methods of Variable Bitrate Encoding: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variable_bitrate#Methods_of_VBR_encoding. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Wikipedia—Portable Network Graphics format: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portable_Network_Graphics. Retrieved Jan. 2013. |
Wikipedia—Unsharp Mask Technique: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unsharp_masking. Retrieved May 3, 2016. |
Wilburn et al., “High Performance Imaging using Large Camera Arrays”, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), vol. 24, Issue 3 (Jul. 2005), Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2005, pp. 765-776. |
Wilburn, Bennett, et al., “High Speed Video Using a Dense Camera Array”, 2004. |
Wilburn, Bennett, et al., “The Light Field Video Camera”, Proceedings of Media Processors 2002. |
Williams, L. “Pyramidal Parametrics,” Computer Graphic (1983). |
Winnemoller, H., et al., “Light Waving: Estimating Light Positions From Photographs Alone”, Eurographics 2005. |
Wippermann, F. “Chirped Refractive Microlens Array,” Dissertation 2007. |
Wuu, S., et al., “A Manufacturable Back-Side Illumination Technology Using Bulk Si Substrate for Advanced CMOS Image Sensors”, 2009 International Image Sensor Workshop, Bergen, Norway. |
Wuu, S., et al., “BSI Technology with Bulk Si Wafer”, 2009 International Image Sensor Workshop, Bergen, Norway. |
Xiao, Z. et al., “Aliasing Detection and Reduction in Plenoptic Imaging,” IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; 2014. |
Xu, Xin et al., “Robust Automatic Focus Algorithm for Low Contrast Images Using a New Contrast Measure,” Sensors 2011; 14 pages. |
Zheng, C. et al., “Parallax Photography: Creating 3D Cinematic Effects from Stills”, Proceedings of Graphic Interface, 2009. |
Zitnick, L. et al., “High-Quality Video View Interpolation Using a Layered Representation,” Aug. 2004; ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2004; vol. 23, Issue 3; pp. 600-608. |
Zoberbier, M., et al., “Wafer Cameras—Novel Fabrication and Packaging Technologies”, 2009 International Image Senor Workshop, Bergen, Norway, 5 pages. |
Georgiev, T., et al., “Suppersolution with Plenoptic 2.0 Cameras,” Optical Society of America 2009; pp. 1-3. |
Georgiev, T., et al., “Unified Frequency Domain Analysis of Lightfield Cameras” (2008). |
Georgiev, T., et al., Plenoptic Camera 2.0 (2008). |
Girod, B., “Mobile Visual Search”, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, Jul. 2011. |
Gortler et al., “The lumigraph” SIGGRAPH 96, pp. 43-54. |
Groen et al., “A Comparison of Different Focus Functions for Use in Autofocus Algorithms,” Cytometry 6:81-91, 1985. |
Heide, F. et al., “High-Quality Computational Imaging Through Simple Lenses,” ACM Transactions on Graphics, SIGGRAPH 2013; pp. 1-7. |
Heidelberg Collaboratory for Image Processing, “Consistent Depth Estimation in a 4D Light Field,” May 2013. |
Hirigoyen, F., et al., “1.1 um Backside Imager vs. Frontside Image: an optics-dedicated FDTD approach”, IEEE 2009 International Image Sensor Workshop. |
Huang, Fu-Chung et al., “Eyeglasses-free Display: Towards Correcting Visual Aberrations with Computational Light Field Displays,” ACM Transaction on Graphics, Aug. 2014, pp. 1-12. |
Isaksen, A., et al., “Dynamically Reparameterized Light Fields,” SIGGRAPH 2000, pp. 297-306. |
Ives H., “Optical properties of a Lippman lenticulated sheet,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 21, 171 (1931). |
Ives, H. “Parallax Panoramagrams Made with a Large Diameter Lens”, Journal of the Optical Society of America; 1930. |
Jackson et al., “Selection of a Convolution Function for Fourier Inversion Using Gridding” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Sep. 1991, vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 473-478. |
Kautz, J., et al., “Fast arbitrary BRDF shading for low-frequency lighting using spherical harmonics”, in Eurographic Rendering Workshop 2002, 291-296. |
Koltun, et al., “Virtual Occluders: An Efficient Interediate PVS Representation”, Rendering Techniques 2000: Proc. 11th Eurographics Workshop Rendering, pp. 59-70, Jun. 2000. |
Kopf, J., et al., Deep Photo: Model-Based Photograph Enhancement and Viewing, SIGGRAPH Asia 2008. |
Lehtinen, J., et al. “Matrix radiance transfer”, in Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, 59-64, 2003. |
Lesser, Michael, “Back-Side Illumination”, 2009. |
Levin, A., et al., “Image and Depth from a Conventional Camera with a Coded Aperture”, SIGGRAPH 2007, pp. 1-9. |
Levoy et al.,“Light Field Rendering” SIGGRAPH 96 Proceeding, 1996. pp. 31-42. |
Levoy, “Light Fields and Computational Imaging” IEEE Computer Society, Aug. 2006, pp. 46-55. |
Levoy, M. “Light Field Photography and Videography,” Oct. 18, 2005. |
Levoy, M. “Stanford Light Field Microscope Project,” 2008; http://graphics.stanford.edu/projects/lfmicroscope/, 4 pages. |
Levoy, M., et al., “Light Field Microscopy,” ACM Transactions on Graphics, vol. 25, No. 3, Proceedings SIGGRAPH 2006. |
Liang, Chia-Kai, et al., “Programmable Aperture Photography: Multiplexed Light Field Acquisition”, ACM SIGGRAPH, 2008. |
Lippmann, “Reversible Prints”, Communication at the French Society of Physics, Journal of Physics, 7 , 4, Mar. 1908, pp. 821-825. |
Lumsdaine et al., “Full Resolution Lighffield Rendering” Adobe Technical Report Jan. 2008, pp. 1-12. |
Maeda, Y. et al., “A CMOS Image Sensor with Pseudorandom Pixel Placement for Clear Imaging,” 2009 International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing and Communication Systems, Dec. 2009. |
Magnor, M. et al., “Model-Aided Coding of Multi-Viewpoint Image Data,” Proceedings IEEE Conference on Image Processing, ICIP-2000, Vancouver, Canada, Sep. 2000. https://graphics.tu-bs.de/static/people/magnor/publications/icip00.pdf. |
Mallat, Stephane, “A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing”, Academic Press 1998. |
Malzbender, et al., “Polynomial Texture Maps”, Proceedings SIGGRAPH 2001. |
Marshall, Richard J. et al., “Improving Depth Estimation from a Plenoptic Camera by Patterned Illumination,” Proc. Of SPIE, vol. 9528, 2015, pp. 1-6. |
Masselus, Vincent, et al., “Relighting with 4D Incident Light Fields”, SIGGRAPH 2003. |
Meynants, G., et al., “Pixel Binning in CMOS Image Sensors,” Frontiers in Electronic Imaging Conference, 2009. |
Moreno-Noguer, F. et al., “Active Refocusing of Images and Videos,” ACM Transactions on Graphics, Aug. 2007; pp. 1-9. |
Munkberg, J. et al., “Layered Reconstruction for Defocus and Motion Blur” EGSR 2014, pp. 1-12. |
Naemura et al., “3-D Computer Graphics based on Integral Photography” Optics Express, Feb. 12, 2001. vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 255-262. |
Nakamura, J., “Image Sensors and Signal Processing for Digital Still Cameras” (Optical Science and Engineering), 2005. |
National Instruments, “Anatomy of a Camera,” pp. 1-5, Sep. 6, 2006. |
Ng, R., et al., “All-Frequency Shadows Using Non-linear Wavelet Lighting Approximation. ACM Transactions on Graphics,” ACM Transactions on Graphics; Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2003. |
Ng, R., et al., “Triple Product Wavelet Integrals for All-Frequency Relighting”, ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2004). |
Ng., R., “Fourier Slice Photography,” ACM Transactions on Graphics, Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2005, vol. 24, No. 3, 2005, pp. 735-744. |
Nguyen, Hubert. “Practical Post-Process Depth of Field.” GPU Gems 3. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Addison-Wesley, 2008. |
Nimeroff, J., et al., “Efficient rendering of naturally illuminatied environments” in Fifth Eurographics Workshop on Rendering, 359-373, 1994. |
Nokia, “City Lens”, May 2012. |
Ogden, J., “Pyramid-Based Computer Graphics”, 1985. |
Okano et al., “Three-dimensional video system based on integral photograohy” Optical Engineering, Jun. 1999. vol. 38, No. 6, pp. 1072-1077. |
Orzan, Alexandrina, et al., “Diffusion Curves: A Vector Representation for Smooth-Shaded Images,” ACM Transactions on Graphics—Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2008; vol. 27; 2008. |
Pain, B., “Back-Side Illumination Technology for SOI-CMOS Image Sensors”, 2009. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160269620 A1 | Sep 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13867333 | Apr 2013 | US |
Child | 15162426 | US |