1. Field of the Invention
The invention generally relates to receivers in spread spectrum communications systems such as WLAN (Wireless Local Area Network) systems, and in particular to the phase error correction of received signals.
2. Description of the Related Art
A Wireless Local Area Network is a flexible data communications system implemented as an extension to or as an alternative for, a wired LAN. Using radio frequency or infrared technology, WLAN devices transmit and receive data over the air, minimizing the need of wired connections. Thus, WLAN systems combine interconnectivity with user mobility.
Most WLAN systems use spread spectrum technology, a wide-band radio frequency technique developed for use in reliable and secure communications systems. The spread spectrum technology is designed to trade-off bandwidth efficiency for reliability, integrity and security. Two types of spread spectrum radio systems are frequently used: frequency hopping and direct sequence systems.
The standard defining and governing wireless local area networks that operate in the 2.4 GHz spectrum, is the IEEE 802.11 standard. To allow higher data rate transmissions, the standard was extended to the 802.11b standard that allows data rates of 5.5 and 11 Mbps in the 2.4 GHz spectrum. This extension is backwards compatible as far as it relates to direct sequence spread spectrum technology, but it adopts a new modulation technique called CCK (Complementary Code Keying) which allows the speed increase.
In WLAN systems as well as in other spread spectrum communication systems, the signal on its way from the transmitter to the receiver experiences several distortions. A frequency error may result from a frequency offset of the radio frequency oscillators at the transmitter and the receiver.
Assuming s(t) to be the transmitted signal
s(t)=A(t)·ejωt
where ω is the carrier frequency, the received signal can be described as
r(t)=B(t)·ej[(ω+ω
where ωe is the oscillator frequency difference between receiver and transmitter, and φe is the difference in oscillator phase between the receiver and the transmitter.
Turning now to
Assuming the baseband signal input to the frequency error correction unit 100 be given as
B(t)·ej(ω
the output signal of the frequency error correction unit 100 will be
B(t)·ej({tilde over (ω)}
where {tilde over (ω)}e denotes the residual frequency error. This signal can be considered a signal with time dependent phase
φe(t)={tilde over (ω)}et+φ0
which will linearly progress in time, as {tilde over (ω)}e and φ0 are constant values.
The phase error correction unit 110 has now the task to remove the remaining phase error such that the received signal is as close as possible to the transmitted signal, to minimize the probability of demodulation errors. An example of how the phase error correction unit 110 may operate is depicted in
The phase error correction unit shown in
B(t)·ejφ
where {tilde over (φ)}e(t) is the current estimate of the phase error. The error correction module 200 is controlled by means of an error signal received from the measurement module 210. The measurement module 210 measures the phase error of the output signal of the correction module 200 and tries to generate the error signal so as to minimize the phase difference φe(t)−{tilde over (φ)}e(t).
Turning now to
Let x(k),x(k−1),x(k−2), . . . be the real parts of the received data samples, and y(k),y(k−1),y(k−2), . . . the respective imaginary parts, and let the real and imaginary parts of the ideal constellation point be given by xA and yA, respectively, the phase error can then be calculated according to
However, there is always an additive white Gaussian noise in the received signal so that the measured signal point will deviate from the cross mark shown in
Thus, measuring the phase difference as shown above has the disadvantage that due to the additive noise, there will be a random measurement error. The greater the radius of the noise region, the greater will be the measurement error. It is to be noted that the measurement error may be up to 100% if the distance between the ideal signal point and the received signal point, i.e. the cross mark, in the constellation diagram does not exceed the radius of the noise region.
Evidently, the measurement module 210 cannot accurately generate an error signal if the phase difference cannot be measured precisely. Thus, the phase error correction in conventional receivers often operate insufficiently, leading to reduced reliability of the overall system, and reducing the settling time of the receiver.
An improved receiver and operation method are provided having increased control quality when performing a phase error correction, in particular in case of noisy data samples.
According to one embodiment, a WLAN receiver is provided that comprises a phase error correction unit that is connected to receive an input signal having a phase error and that is adapted to generate an output signal having a corrected phase error. The WLAN receiver further comprises a despreader that is adapted to despread a data signal. The despreader is connected to the phase error correction unit to provide the despread data signal to the phase error correction unit. The phase error correction unit is arranged for correcting the phase error dependent on the despread data signal.
In another embodiment, a receiver in a spread spectrum communications system is provided. The receiver comprises a phase error correction unit connected to receive an input signal having a phase error and adapted to generate an output signal having a corrected phase error. The receiver further comprises a despreader that is adapted to despread a data signal. The despreader is connected to the phase error correction unit to provide the despread data signal to the phase error correction unit. The phase error correction unit is arranged for correcting the phase error dependent on the despreader data signal.
In yet another embodiment, there may be provided an integrated circuit chip for processing spread spectrum data signals. The integrated circuit chip comprises phase error correction circuitry adapted to correct a phase error in an input signal, and despreader circuitry adapted to despread a data signal. The despreader circuitry is connected to the phase error correction circuitry to provide the despread data signal to the phase error correction circuitry. The phase error correction circuitry is arranged for correcting the phase error dependent on the despread data signal.
In a further embodiment, a method of operating a WLAN receiver is provided. The method comprises correcting a phase error in an input signal, and despreading a data signal. The phase error correction is performed dependent on the despread data signal.
In still a further embodiment, there is provided a method of operating a receiver in a spread spectrum communications system. The method comprises correcting a phase error in an input signal, and despreading a data signal. The phase error correction is performed dependent on the despread data signal.
The accompanying drawings are incorporated into and form a part of the specification for the purpose of explaining the principles of the invention. The drawings are not to be construed as limiting the invention to only the illustrated and described examples of how the invention can be made and used. Further features and advantages will become apparent from the following and more particular description of the invention, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The illustrative embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the figure drawings wherein like elements and structures are indicated by like reference numbers.
Turning now to the drawings, and in particular to
Assuming that the Barker matched filter 410 receives the time dependent real and imaginary parts of the received data sample, i.e. x(t) and y(t), the Barker matched filter 410 will generate the following output:
The measurement module 400 will then generate the error signal according to:
It is to be noted that the output of the Barker matched filter 410 will depend at any time not only on the real and imaginary parts of the currently received data sample but also on the respective values of up to ten previous data samples. Thus, the influence of the additive white noise will be averaged so that the measurement module 400 may generate the error signal with greater precision. This allows for better controlling the quality of the phase error correction compared with conventional, sample-based schemes. Moreover, substantially no additional circuitry is needed for this purpose since a Barker matched filter 410 is usually already present in the receiver.
Turning now to
Thus, while the first embodiment uses a Barker matched filter 410 and is therefore best suited for correcting the phase errors in 802.11 compliant WLAN systems, or in 1 or 2 Mbps modes of 802.11b compliant WLAN receivers, the technique of the second embodiment shown in
The CCK matched filter 510 may be implemented using a Walsh tree. The Walsh tree may consist of a CCK correlator and a CCK comparator, and may use a soft decision maximum likelihood decoding. The comparator is used to find the local maximum. In the present embodiment, the despread signal which is output by the CCK matched filter 510 and provided to the measurement module 500, is the phase output of a CCK decorrelator.
It is to be noted that the arrangement of the second embodiment may achieve the same advantages as the first embodiment. That is, the Gaussian noise will be suppressed because by using a despread signal, the signal is raised from the noise floor. By avoiding a sample-based phase error correction, the measurement of the phase difference as well as the correction of the phase error may be performed more precisely. This reduces demodulation errors and leads to a better overall performance of the WLAN receiver.
Turning now to
In the above embodiments, the measurement modules 400, 500, 600 may be adapted to integrate the phase difference to achieve an estimate of the current phase error:
{tilde over (φ)}e(t)=a·{tilde over (φ)}e(t−1)+b·Δ{tilde over (φ)}e(t)
where a and b are constants. Integration may be done using a low-pass filter, and the term integration as used herein may include any smoothing algorithm that averages over a given period of time, or calculates a weighted sum of a previously smoothed value and a current value. These techniques may even more suppress an influencing additive white noise.
Turning to now to
The despread signal is then integrated in step 710, and an error signal is generated in step 720. It is to be noted that instead of integrating the despread signal and generating the error signal based thereon, an error signal may be generated without a preceding integration step. Moreover, in another embodiment, the error signal could be integrated.
Finally, using the generated error signal, the phase error correction is performed in step 730, and the process returns to step 700 where the output of the correction module 200 is fed to the despreader 410, 510.
The process of selecting one of the Barker matched filter 410 and the CCK matched filter 510 in the third embodiment is shown in
As apparent from the above discussion, a phase error correction technique is provided that is applicable in WLAN systems and other spread spectrum communications systems and that may improve demodulation reliability and settling time by suppressing the influence of additive noise in the received data samples. The technique may be used in particular in 802.11b compliant systems. No restriction with respect to encoding techniques apply, so that the embodiments may achieve the mentioned advantages in BPSK (Binary Phase Shift Keying), QPSK (Quadrature Phase Shift Keying) and other schemes including DQPSK (Differential QPSK).
While the invention has been described with respect to the physical embodiments constructed in accordance therewith, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications, variations and improvements of the present invention may be made in the light of the above teachings and within the purview of the appended claims without departing from the spirit and intended scope of the invention. In addition, those areas in which it is believed that those of ordinary skill in the art are familiar, have not been described herein in order to not unnecessarily obscure the invention described herein. Accordingly, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited by the specific illustrative embodiments, but only by the scope of the appended claims.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 102 24 165 | May 2002 | DE | national |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5666352 | Ohgoshi et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5943329 | Ohgoshi et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 6028888 | Roux | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6134260 | Bottomley et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6292477 | Ohgoshi et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6456609 | Ohgoshi et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
| 6650187 | Riddle et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6661834 | Shan et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6697415 | Mahany | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 7027538 | Ghosh | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 20040086062 | Eckhardt et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1 087 582 | Mar 2001 | EP |
| 1 187 412 | Mar 2002 | EP |
| 0150631 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20030223479 A1 | Dec 2003 | US |