In certain embodiments, an apparatus may comprise a data channel including a phase lock clock (PLC) module configured to synchronize multiple servo clocks to a reference clock, and, after synchronization of the multiple servo clocks, perform a write to a first data storage medium utilizing a single frequency phase while a write head is positioned based on servo zones with different frequencies.
In certain embodiments, a circuit may comprise a write clock circuit configured to produce a write clock, a first servo channel circuit, a second servo channel circuit, a first servo clock circuit configured to produce a first read clock aligned to a first frequency and configured to be utilized by the first servo channel circuit to demodulate a first servo zone having the first frequency and generate first servo timing marks; a second servo clock circuit configured to produce a second read clock aligned to a second frequency and configured to be utilized by the second servo channel circuit to demodulate a second servo zone having the second frequency and generate second servo timing marks, and a disc locked clock (DLC) control circuit configured to maintain phase coherency based on the first servo timing marks and the second servo timing marks when switching from the first servo zone to the second servo zone. The circuit may be configured to synchronize the first servo clock and the second servo clock to the write clock, and, after synchronization of the first and second servo clocks, perform a write to a first data storage medium utilizing a single frequency phase while a write head is positioned based on both the first servo zone and the second servo zone.
In certain embodiments, a memory device storing instructions that when executed cause a processing circuit to perform a method comprising synchronizing, in a data channel, multiple servo clocks to a reference clock, and after synchronization of the multiple servo clocks, performing a write to a first data storage medium utilizing a single frequency phase while a write head is positioned based on servo zones with different frequencies.
In the following detailed description of certain embodiments, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and in which are shown by way of illustration of example embodiments. It is also to be understood that features of the embodiments and examples herein can be combined, exchanged, or removed, other embodiments may be utilized or created, and structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present disclosure.
In accordance with various embodiments, the methods and functions described herein may be implemented as one or more software programs running on a computer processor or controller. Dedicated hardware implementations including, but not limited to, application specific integrated circuits (ASIC), programmable logic arrays, system-on-chip (SoC), and other hardware devices can likewise be constructed to implement the circuits, functions, processes, and methods described herein. Methods and functions may be performed by modules or engines, both of which may include one or more physical components of a computing device (e.g., logic, circuits, processors, controllers, etc.) configured to perform a particular task or job, or may include instructions that, when executed, can cause a processor or control system to perform a particular task or job, or may be any combination thereof. Further, the methods described herein may be implemented as a computer readable storage medium or memory device including instructions that, when executed, cause a processor to perform the methods.
Referring to
In some embodiments, such as a DSD, the buffer memory 112 can temporarily store data during read and write operations, and can include a command queue (CQ) 113 where multiple pending operations can be temporarily stored pending execution. Commands arriving over the interface 104 may be received in the CQ 113 or may be stored there by controller 106, interface 104, or another component. There may also be additional memory 103, which, for example, can be a volatile or nonvolatile solid-state memory.
The DSD 100 can include a programmable controller 106, which can include associated memory 108 and processor 110. The DSD 140 can include a read-write (R/W) data channel 117, which can encode data during write operations and reconstruct user (or host) data retrieved from a memory, such as disc(s) 109, during read operations. A preamplifier circuit (preamp) 118 can apply write currents to the head(s) 119 and provide pre-amplification of read-back signals. A servo control circuit 120 may use servo data to provide the appropriate current to the coil 124, sometimes called a voice coil motor (VCM), to position the head(s) 119 over a desired area of the disc(s) 109. The controller 106 can communicate with a processor 122 to move the head(s) 119 to the desired locations on the disc(s) 109 during execution of various pending commands, such as read or write commands in the command queue 113. The disc(s) 109 may each contain one or two surfaces that store data; for example, each top side of a disc and each bottom side of a disc can be used to store data.
During operation, the head(s) 119 of DSD 140 may be used to write data to and read data from the surface(s) of the disc(s) 109. The head(s) 119 may include both a write head element and a read head element. The write head can produce a magnetic field to write a signal to the disc 109 to facilitate storing data thereon. As the disc(s) 109 spin, the write head can store data in narrow concentric data tracks on the disc(s) 109, such as shown in
Further, the system 140 can utilize the head(s) 119 and servo system 120 to perform a self-servo writing (SSW) process to write servo patterns on a surface of the disc(s) 109 without using external servo writing equipment. In some examples of a spiral SSW process, some surfaces may be written with single zone servo patterns temporarily and later overwritten with different servo patterns, which may have different frequencies. However, such rewriting of the servo patterns can be costly because of the amount of time consumed in manufacturing because of writing the servo patterns multiple times.
A solution to this and other problems, as detailed herein, can include writing the final servo patterns the first time without writing any temporary servo patterns. This solution can be implemented by a phase locked clock (PLC) module 130 that can perform a method of writing with a single frequency phase coherently across servo zones with different frequencies. The PLC module 130 can phase-lock a clock to a media written with multiple servo zones of different frequencies. While the PLC module 130 can perform such methods for a SSW process, the methods can also be utilized for other applications that can benefit from writing with a single frequency phase coherently while a write head is guided based on servo zones with different frequencies.
Data may be stored to a disc memory 200 along very narrow concentric bands called tracks (not shown). There may be hundreds of thousands of tracks on a single disc surface, and so a DSD may need to be extremely precise in positioning the head(s) over a correct track when performing operations. In order to know where the head(s) are currently located (e.g., over which track), a DSD may read servo positioning information stored to the disc, such as in servo sectors 206.
As stated, the disc 200 may be configured to record data (e.g., system data or user data) to a multitude of concentric circular data tracks (or just “tracks”) arranged from an outer diameter 202 to an inner diameter 204 of the disc 200. The disc 200 may spin about a central spindle located at the inner diameter 204. A read or write head, such as head(s) 119 of
The storage and subsequent retrieval of data from a disc surface 200 can be achieved by the demodulation of servo signals generated by a read element reading the servo patterns. As shown in
The data contained within each servo sector 206 may specify its physical radial and tangential locations. As a read element passes over each servo sector 206, the servo sector's information may be demodulated such that the position of the read head is always known to the hard-disc controller (the position of the write-head may also be inferred). Furthermore, the spacing between servo sectors 206 can be utilized to modulate the frequency of clocks used for all write and read operations such that the frequencies remain consistent relative to the rotational velocity of the disc 200. It is this processing of the servo pattern which allows for consistent writes and reliable reads from a disc drive. Although a simplified example is provided in
The writing procedure of the servo pattern can be performed by a dedicated machine known as a servowriter, disc writer, STW (servo track writer), MDW (multi-disc writer), or MDSW (multi-disc servo writer), where the servo patterns are written to the discs before the discs are assembled into the drive. A servowriter may be a very precise and expensive piece of equipment, and therefore it may be advantageous to use as efficiently as possible to improve manufacturing throughput and reduce overhead. Using a servowriter to write every servo wedge 208 of every disc 200 may be slow and inefficient.
Another way to write the servo pattern is via self-servo write (SSW). A drive, such as system 140, employing an SSW process may utilize its embedded controller and its own write heads to write the servo wedges and associated servo sectors 206 to the surface(s) of its constituent disc(s), thus saving cost and time. In order to accurately position the servo patterns on the disc 200, the controller may determine the position of the heads by locking on to a pre-written (e.g., written using a STW) or self-written pattern (e.g., via SSW) on the disc 200 called a spiral pattern 212. The spiral pattern 212 may be written to include a sync mark data pattern that can be used to determine when a spiral 212 is encountered by a read head. Writing the spirals 212 may include moving a write head in a controlled manner (e.g., at a constant velocity) from the outer diameter 202 to the inner diameter 204 (or vice versa) as the disc 200 is spun to create the spiral pattern 212. Although a single spiral pattern 212 is depicted in
In some SSW systems, a spiral pattern can be written to a blank disc surface while reading a servo pattern written to the surface of another disc. To generate the requisite spiral write-head trajectory, a seek is conducted during the write operation, which smoothly pushes the write head from the OD 202 to the ID 204. In some circumstances, the servo pattern being read can utilize a single frequency over the entire disc's surface (a single-zone servo pattern), however, a final servo pattern (e.g., the servo pattern on the disc(s) after all SSW processes have completed and the corresponding HDD is ready for host data storage) should include frequency changes at discrete locations along the radius of the disc, a design intended to reduce the overhead associated with the written servo pattern. If a single-zone servo pattern is employed, it is straightforward to read this servo pattern while writing the spiral pattern, with the spiral (write) clock locked to servo (read) clock. This approach, however, cannot be used for an HDD employing multi-zoned servo. The difficulty encountered is that the servo clock must change frequencies at the servo zone boundaries and, as such, a spiral (write) clock (which has a constant frequency from OD to ID) locked to the utilized servo clock would incur large phase excursions at these boundaries. This would inexorably corrupt the written spiral pattern and, thus, precludes the use of such a method in this context.
However, herein disclosed are methods and systems that allow for a spiral to be written in a manner synchronous to the media when a zoned servo pattern is used for head positioning. The disclosed methodology includes synchronizing the servo clocks to the spiral writing clock (e.g., use the spiral clock as the reference clock).
In addition, there are other solutions to perform an SSW; however, as detailed below, these solutions encounter problems and difficulties. For example, in a forward synchronization system, a method for locking two clocks of different frequencies can be utilized. An example of such is provided in co-owned U.S. Pat. No. 10,936,003, entitled “Phase Locking Multiple Clocks of Different Frequencies”, issued on Mar. 2, 2021, to Wu et al. A forward synchronization method can have a write clock generated by a spiral clock that can be synchronized to a read clock generated by a servo clock. The synchronization procedure can be conducted by a synchronization block which downsamples the applied clocks by factors N and M, respectively, to generate two clocks that are of equivalent frequencies. These, equal-rate, clocks can be applied to a phase-error detector circuit to generate a signal indicating the relative relationship of the timing of their edges. This signal can then be lowpass filtered and used to drive the adjustment of a digital-to-phase converter (DPC) to shift the phase of the write clock to achieve alignment with the read clock. With the phase locking of the two downsampled clocks as well as some digital circuits to reset the counters, modulo counters using the two clocks should align at specific counter values as well at the end of procedure. This process acts to synchronize the write clock to the read clock.
There is an implied direction of this synchronization process, as adjustments are made (though use of a DPC) to the write clock to follow the edges of the read clock. In the procedure detailed above, the read clock is also being used to demodulate servo sectors written to the disc and generate timestamps for their constituent servo timing mark (STM) fields. The difference of these timestamps with desired timestamp values are used to drive the operation of a disc-locked clock (DLC), which locks the read clock to the surface of the disc. The operation of synchronizing the write clock to the read clock, then, has the effect of transitively locking the write clock to features on the disc's surface as well.
However, the method of transitively locking the write clock to the surface of the disc by locking it to a read clock that is already locked to the disc's surface causes some difficulties. As described above, the change in the read (servo) clock frequency required as servo zone boundaries are crossed causes the change of read clock, thus the read clock loses phase synchronization with the disc's surface. As a result, the write clock loses the lock to the read clock and loses synchronization to the disc. A method to obviate this difficulty is to utilize a two-step process for writing spirals. In the first step, a surface is written with a single-zoned servo pattern, which is used for the seek operation while writing the spiral pattern. In this case, the servo frequency never changes during the seek operation and, thus, the write clock can maintain lock with the disc's surface by locking it to the read (servo) clock. After spirals have been written, the second step is to re-write the single-zoned servo surface written with a multi-zoned servo pattern. Although this procedure is effective in practice, it also incurs additional test-time through use of multiple steps. As an increased manufacturing test-time directly leads to an increase in the cost of production, this solution is not desirable.
Another proposed solution to this problem is to generate timestamps for the STMs using the spiral clock rather than the servo clock used to demodulate the written servo pattern. As the spiral clock does not change frequency over the duration of a seek operation, this would appear to be a viable solution. The operation, however, of generating a timestamp on the spiral clock for the location of a timing mark written and processed at a different frequency (the servo clock data-rate) is difficult to implement. One possibility is to latch the event asynchronously across clock domains; however, this would create uncertainty in the timestamps which has been shown to degrade the spiral quality. Another possibility is to process the servo sector using the spiral clock in an attempt to generate timestamps that do not have uncertainty. The implementation of this approach, however, is very complex as it requires the addition of hardware to process signals read at sampling rates that do not match the written baud rate.
Due to the difficulties and problems of these other solutions, herein is another solution that addresses the problems encountered when writing a spiral pattern synchronously to a disc while conducting a seek using a multi-zoned servo pattern.
The newly disclosed processes(es) and system(s), such as depicted in
These systems and processes can synchronize the servo clocks 303 and 304 to the spiral writing clock 302 to use the spiral clock as a reference clock. This may be referred to as “backward synchronization”. As shown in
Each of the servo clocks 303 and 304 can be applied to a servo channel for demodulation of servo sectors and generation of STM timestamps (e.g., servo channel SRV-A (CH0) can be used to demodulate servo sectors in zone A). Because the servo clock 303 is synchronized to spiral clock 302, its DPC 308 can be adjusted to change the phase of the SRV-A clock 311. The synchronized servo clock 311 (with DPC adjustments), not the free-running servo clock 303 (without the DPC adjustment), can be fed into the servo channel to generate the timestamps on STMs. Since the synchronized servo clock 311 is phase locked to the spiral clock 302, the timestamps can reflect the phase relationship of the STMs on the media to the synchronized servo clock 311, as well as that to the spiral clock 302. The timing error generated by these timestamps can be used to close the DLC loop through control of DLC alpha 305. Since the DLC feedback can be applied to both the servo PLLs 303 and 304 and the RCH PLL 302, any major correction of clock frequency and phase can be applied to all clocks. The timing error, in fact, is based on the phase of the spiral clock 302 (RCH PLL) through such a locking process. Therefore, the spiral clock can be locked to the media (STMs) indirectly through the DLC loop of the servo clock 311, while the servo clock 311 maintains synchronization to the spiral clock 302.
The synchronization of the servo clock to the reference clock can be based on the phase difference between the downsampled clocks of the reference (write) and servo clock (such as was demonstrated in U.S. Pat. No. 10,936,003, entitled “Phase Locking Multiple Clocks of Different Frequencies”, issued on Mar. 2, 2021, to Wu et al.). For example, the first synchronization circuit 306 can be configured to adjust the first DPC 308 based on differences in clock edges of the reference clock 302 to the first servo clock 303; and the second synchronization circuit 307 can be configured to adjust the second DPC 309 based on differences in clock edges of the reference clock 302 to the second servo clock 304. Further, the timing marks from each servo channel can be used for a respective DLC loop control, such that the servo timestamps are used to lock the servo clocks (and, transitively, the write clock) to a disc. Thus, the full lock of the reference clock 302 to the media can depend on the synchronization between servo and reference clocks, and the common control of a DLC based on the servo timing marks.
Referring to
Referring to
The procedure can start in servo zone A, in which servo channel/clock SRV-A (CH0) is used for reading servo and SRV-A clock is already synchronized to the spiral clock (through the backward synchronization). The servo channel/clock SRV-B (CH1) can then be programmed to the parameters of zone B and also the SRV-B clock can be synchronized to the spiral clock. Note that this operation has no effect on SRV-A clock or the spiral clock. The DPC in SRV-B begins adjustment until SRV-B clock is also synchronized to the spiral clock. At this moment, both the SRV-A clock and the SRV-B clock are synchronized to the spiral clock and, therefore, the SRV-A and the SRV-B clocks are, indirectly, phase locked to each other.
While the clocks are locked, the head can be moved to the overlapping area of zone A servo and zone B servo such that calibration may occur. The goal is to calibrate the targeted timestamp position of zone B when reading and locking to the zone A timestamps.
With the timestamp target calibrated, a zone switch with no phase shift of the spiral clock can now be performed. The zone A servo clock (SRV-A) can be synchronized to the spiral clock while the DLC loop is running using the SRV-A (CH0) timestamps. Then, when the DLC converges, the SRV-A clock/counter can be locked to the disc while also being synchronized to the spiral clock/counter. By phase locking the SRV-A clock to the media and aligning the spiral counter and the SRV-A counter to the same counter values as in calibration, the spiral counters and the SRV-A counters can be phase locked to the media at exactly the same position as in calibration. While the head seeks through zone A, this lock will be maintained. When the head moves from zone A to zone B, and the DLC control is switched from SRV-A(CH0) to SRVB (CH1), the system only needs to update the timing error of the DLC control loop input from using timestamps in zone A to using the timestamps in zone B. In particular, assume that the DLC loop timing error in zone A for wedge n can be written as
TEDLC(n)=TSA(n)−TarA
where TarA is the timestamp target of zone A and TSA(n) is the timestamp of zone A at wedge n. In this example, a target that is only associated with the cycle counter is being used, for example, cycle count 500 at every wedge. Thus, in the above equation, the wedge counter value will not be included in the timestamp TSA(n). Assume that the head is moving from wedge n to wedge n+1 and the DLC timing error input starts to use the SRV-B (CH1) timestamps from zone B servo pattern at wedge n+1, the timing error in zone B can then be calculated as
TEDLC(n+(TSB(n+1)−TarB)×fA/fB
where TarB is the timestamp target calibrated earlier in the procedure. In order to keep the same scale of the timing error into the DLC loop, a ratio of data rate of zone A to zone B fA/fB is added as a normalization factor in the timing error computation for zone B (e.g., a DLC error of N generated in zone A will affect the DLC operation differently than the same error generated in zone B due to the disparity of frequencies without this normalization). In this way, there is no extra phase shift being introduced to the DLC loop and the spiral clock can maintain locking to the media.
Since it takes some time to synchronize the zone B clock to the spiral clock, zone A should be large enough to allow for synchronization of the SRV-B clock to the spiral clock such that the SRV-B clock is fully synchronized before the zone switch occurs. At the seek rate utilized in SSW, there is usually more than enough time for this synchronization to complete.
Referring to
In some embodiments, the procedure 600 can be considered to have three stages: a calibration stage, a training for repeatable runout (RRO) compensation stage, and a writing of the spiral pattern stage. In the calibration stage, the timestamp targets for each zone can be calibrated at the overlapping area of servo zone boundaries. Once the timestamp targets are calibrated for each zone switch, the procedure 600 can switch zone with no phase uncertainty(e.g., phase shifts). Therefore, the head can seek from OD to ID through different zones while the spiral clock maintains phase lock to the disc. The trajectory of the head seeking can be carefully controlled and repeated. Before actually writing spiral, the firmware can collect RRO compensation information through the same seeking procedure and trajectory to reduce the phase variation during the spiral pattern writing. After the RRO training stage, which may include several seeks from OD to ID at the same locations on the disc, the firmware can write the spiral pattern with the same, albeit RRO compensated, seeking procedure.
In this abbreviated example, a same synchronization/zone switching procedure can be used repeatedly, with some other settings or steps varying. Therefore, such synchronization sequence may be used throughout the writing procedure as the main sequence, and provided below are details of possible implementations in each step for these three stages.
As a specific example, assume that there are four servo zones on a disc data storage medium, here are steps that can be in a synchronization procedure:
Step 1, at 602. Initial clock lock in zone 0: This is a special procedure at the beginning, when nothing is synchronized. After this step, the SRV-A clock can be synchronized to the spiral clock and the synchronized SRV-A (CH0) clock used to run the DLC loop to convergence. Below are some details in this process that can make the initial phase difference between the spiral clock and the servo clock smaller, thus making the synchronization step easier. As an example of a firmware sequence that can implement this step 1, initial lock steps can be as follows:
a. Setup servo channel SRV-A (CH0) to zone 0 parameters, and setup RCH channel for spiral writing. Run a DLC process on SRV-A (CH0) and let it converge.
b. Reset SRV-A wedge counter to align with a servo index mark (SIM) position. For example, reset the counter such that SIM is in wedge 0.
c. Setup the synchronization registers prior to the synchronization procedure. Also, asynchronously reset spiral counters at SIM such that the synchronization alignment positions on both clocks, RCH (spiral write) and SRV-A, are very close. For example, if the synchronization alignment position for both clocks are when their wedge and cycle counters become zero, the RCH wedge counter can be set to 0 at SIM, and the RCH cycle counter can be set to a number (e.g., calculated from servo timestamp target and clock ratio) that would align the zero close to the servo cycle counter 0.
d. Start the synchronization sequence of SRV-A clock to spiral clock. This can include resetting the spiral clock divider at the alignment position, allowing the synchronization PLL to converge and eventually resetting the SRV-A clock counter at the alignment position.
e. Because the synchronization step above is changing the SRV-A DPC, the DLC loop will receive the disturbance away from the converged state. The synchronization loop and DLC loop will eventually converge, thus the spiral clock and the SRV-A clock will be fully locked to the media through how is described above.
Step 2, at 604. Stay locked in zone 0: after step 1, the SRV-A clock should be synchronized to the spiral clock, and DLC loop should be running through SRV-A (CH0) timestamps from zone 0. In this state, now the SRV-B (CH1) servo clock and channel can be turned on to be programmed to the zone 1 servo parameters and then the SRV-B clock can be synchronized to the spiral clock. After SRV-B clock is synchronized to spiral clock, different process can be completed during different stages, for example:
a. Calibration stage: the head can be moved to the overlapping area at the boundary of zone 0 and zone 1 with all three clocks locked. The timestamp target Tar1 for zone 1 can be calibrated using the method described above. After the calibration is done with Tar1 known, the process can go to the next step—switching to zone 1 using Tar1.
b. Stages after calibration: after calibration, the timestamp targets (Tari, i=0, 1, 2, 3) for all zones are already known. Therefore, the head can perform a normal seek across zone 0. The synchronization of clock SRV-B is done at the same time of head seeking in zone 0. Before the next step (zone switch) or say before the head moves to the zone boundary (the head is seeking continuously), clock SRV-B synchronization can be converged. In practice, there is plenty of time for the clock to synchronize while the head seeks in one servo zone. Every time starting from a random initial condition of the drive and clock phases, the process should be able to lock all the clocks at the same position relative to the media through step 1, which means the movement of the head and the clock phases are well controlled and repeatable. Thus, several of the same seek and train for RRO compensation paths can be repeatedly run. The RRO training and writing of the spiral stages should be exactly the same with settings and head trajectory over the disc, except that during training the spiral write gate is not turned on and RRO information are collected; while in a writing procedure, the spiral write gate is turned on and RRO compensation is used based on the collected RRO information.
Step 3, at 606. Switch to zone 1: in calibration stage, the firmware can choose when to switch zone after Tar1 is obtained. In other stages when the head is seeking across the surface, the time and position for zone switch can be pre-determined. Using the procedure of switching zone as described, in either case, at the end of zone switch, servo channel SRV-B(CH1) is reading the servo pattern in zone 1. The DLC loop control is determined by the CH1 timestamps from the CH0 timestamps and SRV-B clock is synchronized to the spiral clock. Servo clock and channel SRV-A (CH0) are now freed.
Step 4, at 608. Stay locked in zone 1: similarly, as in zone 0, now the SRV-B (CH1) clock is synchronized to the spiral clock, and the DLC loop timing error comes from the timestamps of zone 1 servo pattern through servo channel CH1. The SRV-A (CH0) is now setup for reading zone 2 servo patterns and then synchronized to the spiral clock. The synchronization can be done before the calibration starts in a calibration procedure, or before the next step of zone switch in other procedures, which is the same requirement as step 2. Also similarly, the calibration is to calibrate the timestamp target for zone 2 Tar2 and when that is acquired, the process can switch zones in the next step.
Step 5, at 610. Switch to zone 2: similar to step 3, after the switch SRV-A (CH0) should be reading the zone 2 servo pattern. The DLC loop timing error will be switched to the one generated from servo channel SRV-A (CH0) and the SRV-A clock can be synchronized to the spiral clock. The SRV-B (CH1) servo clock and channel are now freed up.
Step 6, at 612. Stay locked in zone 2: SRV-A (Ch0) can be used for DLC control and SRV-A clock should be synchronized to the spiral clock. During the seeking of the head before zone switch or before the calibration procedure, SRV-B (CH1) can be setup for zone 3 and the clock SRV-B can be synchronized to the spiral clock. At the calibration, the timestamp target Tar3 can be obtained.
Step 7, at 614. Switch to zone 3: the two servo channels, SRV-A (CH0) and SRV-B (CH1), can keep being used alternatively through the zone switch. At this switch, SRV-B (CH1) can be used to obtain the STMs from zone 3 servo patterns and feed them into the DLC loop and the SRV-B clock can also be synchronized to the spiral clock. SRV-A (CH0) is freed up. Typically, this step is not required for the calibration procedure, since all the timestamp targets are already known at this point. Thus, in some embodiments, the calibration stage can stop after step 6.
Step 8, at 616. Stay locked in zone 3: SRV-B (CH1) should be reading the zone 3 servo pattern and synchronized to the spiral clock. After this step, the head can go back to the OD. If another seek is needed, start from step 1 again.
In some embodiments, when multiple spirals are to be written on one surface, the process may only need to do one calibration step. After the calibration, the zone targets can be used for all the writing of the spirals. For each spiral writing though, the process may train RRO separately, and therefore, a synchronization procedure such as this could be used repeatedly.
The illustrations of the embodiments described herein are intended to provide a general understanding of the structure of the various embodiments. The illustrations are not intended to serve as a complete description of all of the elements and features of apparatus and systems that utilize the structures or methods described herein. Many other embodiments may be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the disclosure. Other embodiments may be utilized and derived from the disclosure, such that structural and logical substitutions and changes may be made without departing from the scope of the disclosure. Moreover, although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, it should be appreciated that any subsequent arrangement designed to achieve the same or similar purpose may be substituted for the specific embodiments shown.
This disclosure is intended to cover any and all subsequent adaptations or variations of various embodiments. Combinations of the above embodiments can be made, and other embodiments not specifically described herein will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the description. Additionally, the illustrations are merely representational and may not be drawn to scale. Certain proportions within the illustrations may be exaggerated, while other proportions may be reduced. Accordingly, the disclosure and the figures are to be regarded as illustrative and not restrictive.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5461644 | Bermans et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5500776 | Smith | Mar 1996 | A |
5621769 | Wan et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5862192 | Huszar et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6111712 | Vishakhadatta et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6181213 | Chang | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6396887 | Ware et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6438185 | Huttunen | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6493176 | Deng et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6519107 | Ehrlich et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6549587 | Li | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6581182 | Lee | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6831803 | Hsin | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6847503 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6956711 | Hanson et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6975480 | Codilian et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6977792 | Melrose et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7027253 | Sun et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7027256 | Subrahmanyam et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7085330 | Shirali | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7088532 | Krajnovich et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7088533 | Shepherd et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7106542 | Sun et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7119981 | Hanson et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7133239 | Hartman et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7149044 | Chen et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7154689 | Shepherd et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7161759 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7196864 | Yi et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7212369 | Levy et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7230789 | Brunnett et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7233455 | Rewerts et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7248427 | Everett et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7330331 | Zhang | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7355808 | Tung et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7375918 | Shepherd et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7440208 | McEwen et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7440224 | Ehrlich et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7474491 | Liikanen et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7489469 | Sun et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7542230 | Melrose et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7561359 | Jeong et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7589930 | Hanson et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7595954 | Chen et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7787209 | Liikanen et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
8027117 | Sutardja | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8139301 | Li et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8160181 | Song et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8296637 | Varnica et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8508879 | Zou et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8543894 | Varnica et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8643976 | Wang et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8670206 | Liang et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8887033 | Varnica et al. | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8953276 | Pokharel et al. | Feb 2015 | B1 |
9019642 | Xia et al. | Apr 2015 | B1 |
9093097 | Lee et al. | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9099132 | Grundvig et al. | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9142246 | Trantham et al. | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9189315 | Varnica et al. | Nov 2015 | B1 |
9245578 | Wang et al. | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9246668 | Yu et al. | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9311959 | Fan et al. | Apr 2016 | B1 |
9361919 | Lieu et al. | Jun 2016 | B1 |
9385757 | Nangare | Jul 2016 | B1 |
9489976 | Jury et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9536563 | Liu et al. | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9645763 | Sankaranarayanan et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9998136 | Wu | Jun 2018 | B1 |
10014026 | Wu et al. | Jul 2018 | B1 |
10049692 | Liu et al. | Aug 2018 | B1 |
10164760 | Bellorado et al. | Dec 2018 | B1 |
10177771 | Bellorado et al. | Jan 2019 | B1 |
10180868 | Alhussien et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10276233 | Dan et al. | Apr 2019 | B1 |
10297281 | Bellorado et al. | May 2019 | B1 |
10469290 | Marrow et al. | Nov 2019 | B1 |
10498565 | Azenkot et al. | Dec 2019 | B1 |
10936003 | Wu | Mar 2021 | B1 |
11074933 | Mendonsa et al. | Jul 2021 | B1 |
20020080898 | Agazzi et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030185114 | Liaw | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030198152 | Morishima | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040101068 | Wang et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040268033 | Chia et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050270687 | Zweighaft | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060214708 | Huang et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060215290 | Kurtas et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20080007855 | Vityaev et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090028252 | Lu | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090097606 | Hutchins et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090147402 | Sul et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090262870 | Ashbrook et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100265614 | Kim et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110072335 | Liu et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20120082018 | Gushima et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20130201838 | Homchaudhuri et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140009192 | Suzuki | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140035638 | Bode | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140223114 | Wang et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150022916 | Zou et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150355838 | Chen et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150380048 | Oberg et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160019921 | Bui et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160164532 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160293205 | Jury et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160351227 | Koshino | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170125089 | Sankaranarayanan et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170125110 | Sankaranarayanan et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170236592 | Alhussien et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170249206 | Jeong et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20180011753 | Alhussien et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180012663 | Alhussien et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180277158 | Kishino | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180367164 | Marrow et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190130967 | Danjean et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20200065262 | Bellorado | Feb 2020 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Guo, Yuanbin , “An Efficient Circulant MIMO Equalizer for CDMA Downlink: Algorithm and VLSI Architecture”, Hindawi Publishing Corporation, Jan. 1, 2006 00:00:00.0, pp. 1-18. |
Hicks, James , “Overloaded Array Processing with Spatially Reduced Search Joint Detection”, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, May 10, 2000 00:00:00.0, pp. 1-144. |
Mohammad, Maruf , “Blind Acquisition of Short Burst with Per-Survivor Processing (PSP)”, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, Nov. 26, 2002 00:00:00.0, pp. 1-127. |
Nechaev, Y. B., et al., “Increasing Efficiency of Information Transmission with Interference Influence by the Use of Multi-Parameter Adaptation”, East-West Design & Test Symposium (EWDTS 2013), Rostov-on-Don, 2013, pp. 1-4 (Year: 2013). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230206951 A1 | Jun 2023 | US |