The invention pertains to detection of fluids. Particularly, the invention relates to such detection with concentrator and separator devices. More particularly, it pertains to the detection of fluids with integrated devices.
Aspects of structures and processes related to gas sensors may be disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,393,894, issued May 28, 2002, and entitled “Gas Sensor with Phased Heaters for Increased Sensitivity,” which is incorporated herein by reference, and in U.S. Pat. No. 4,944,035, issued Jul. 24, 1990, and entitled “Measurement of Thermal Conductivity and Specific Heat,” which is incorporated herein by reference.
Multi-gas detection and analysis may be automated via affordable, in-situ, ultra-sensitive, low-power, low-maintenance and compact micro sensors and analyzers. A micro gas micro analyzer incorporating a phased heater array, concentrator and separator contributes to the availability of a low-cost multi-gas analyzer.
The present micro analyzer may be low-power, fast, compact, low cost, intelligent, wireless, low maintenance, robust and highly sensitive. A vast portion of the micro analyzer may be integrated on a chip with conventional semiconductor processes or micro electromechanical machined system (MEMS) techniques. The fabrication of about 1-μm-thick membranes as GC-column structure (see further details below) may result in low-power consumption, fast, compact and in situ placement of the micro analyzer. The flow rate of the air or gas sample through the sensor may be very small. Further, a carrier gas for the samples is not needed and eliminates the associated maintenance and bulk of pressurized gas-tank handling. This approach permits the sensor to provide quick analyses and prompt results, maybe at least an order of magnitude faster than some related art devices. It avoids the delay and costs of labor-intensive laboratory analyses. The sensor is intelligent in that it may have an integrated microcontroller for analysis and determination of gases detected, and may maintain accuracy, successfully operate and communicate information in and from unattended remote locations. The phased micro analyzer is, among other things, a lower-power, faster, and more compact, more sensitive and affordable version of a gas chromatograph.
The present micro analyzer may involve fabrication, connection, switching and control of a continuous heater film that is energized not by discrete heater element steps, but by a continuous but short heat pulse that is made to travel at about the same speed as that of the sample gas. One may improve the continuous but one-side-of-channel heater plus adsorber film with one covering the whole internal wall of a dielectric-material capillary of high internal surface/volume ratio. The analyte concentration wave may be shaped by sizing the heater element to optimize peak width and height in relation to the detector size and natural desorption wave width. There may be elimination of the artistry of related-art GC films by the application of a repeatable, compatible, thermally cyclable and patternable film, according to a semiconductor industry-grade process.
A mechanism 30 for heating sample fluid 12 may have a continuous heater film 25 as shown in
An alternate approach for generating hot zone 34, besides by microwave synthesis of a moving delta-function in a delay line, may involve scanning IR/visible light beams from an arc, hot filament or laser source(s) rather than by moving or stationary heaters, or by streams of cooled and heated air.
The ratio of the channel-fluid/adsorber-film volumes may be referred to as the β-factor. A small β-factor may make for a more effective and sensitive column, since there would be an increased adsorber-film volume relative to the channel-fluid volume. By moving to a pre-concentrator design with larger adsorber surface, the β-factor value may be improved, whether the heater plus adsorber coating is applied to the whole internal diameter of a capillary. The β-factor may be improved with a square- or star-shaped cross section for attaining a still smaller β-value. Continuous heater 25 described may enable one to energize such a structure. Triangular, square and/or star-shaped cross sections can be made via extrusion of polymer fibers of Honeywell International Inc. of Morristown, N.J.
An alternative to the forced desorption via the ideal, continuous, traveling hot-zone 34 may be an array of heater elements whose lengths may be fixed but not equal to each other. This may involve optimizing heater element dimensions. For instance, the heater array may consist of one very long heater 26 (˜10–30 cm) followed by a much shorter heater (˜0.2–1 mm or 2 to 10 d, with d=diameter of channel 33 of ˜0.1 mm) that may accumulate all of the pre-concentrated analyte before “injection” into TCD 20 (thermal conductivity detector) between the end of concentrator 19 and the inlet to separator 21. This may involve an easier assembly with fewer heaters. However, significant power may be needed to heat almost the whole concentrator 19 simultaneously. On the other hand, the array could consist of 10–20 medium-sized heater elements (˜1–5 cm) to collect and concentrate the analyte and 1–3 short ones (˜0.2–1 mm) to “focus” and “inject” a so optimized pulse into the following separator 21 and TCD 20. A combination of the preceding approaches may be used. The last heater element in the structure, one or a few short element(s), might even feature a thermo-electrically (TE) cooled element (to minimize any loss of analyte) before it is rapidly heated to provide the final “injector” pulse.
An optimization of system 10 may include integration of the TCD-Concentrator-TCD-Separator-TCD elements on one chip as in
As to the adsorber coating, most GC (gas chromatography) adsorber coatings are proprietary to GC supplier houses, such as Supelco™, Chrompack-Varian™ and Restek™, and their fabrication relies on the skill and trade secrets of their staff. For the present sensor system 10, one may use a particular class of coatings of “Spin-On Glasses” offered and marketed by Honeywell International Inc. One such glass may be Nanoglass® E, which has a porosity near 40%, pore sizes in the 20 Å range, and surface areas of 800–900 m2/g, similar to high-quality GC coatings.
In sum, system 10 may use a continuous heater mechanism 30. A traveling and short hot-zone 34 (electrical delta function) may be used on heatable adsorber strip 25 to obtain continuous sample gas analyte concentration augmentation, rather than using an array of discrete heater elements. An arbitrary heater profile in space and time may be used for the separator 21. Hot zone 34 may be generated via microwave synthesis of a moving delta-function in a delay line, or via scanning IR-visible light beams from an arc, hot filament or laser sources.
High-surface adsorber channels may be effected by a use of capillaries with fully-coated internal surfaces (rather than the one-sided film) of channel 33 having a round, square of even star-shaped cross section, to increase the concentrating and the speed of the separating operation (i.e., a large surface enables the use of thinner and faster GC films).
The use of an array of heater elements whose lengths may be fixed but not equal to each other, and may include elements featuring TE-cooling and TE- or R-heating; to maximize preconcentration and/or concentration, minimize power use, optimize injection pulse, yet minimize number of elements, complexity and cost. The envisioned optimization may even include integration of the TCD-Concentrator-TCT-Separator-TCD elements to maximize the effectiveness of the pulse injection operation.
As to film material, one may use any one of Honeywell International Inc.'s many types of “Spin-On Glass” coating material to provide the GC adsorber film. Acceptable materials may include the open-pore, functionalized for hydrophobicity Nanoglass®E or the polymeric “GX-3P” or polymethyl-siloxane type of SOG compounds offered by Honeywell and others, functionalized for the desired level of polarity.
An effective concentrator 19, inside a capillary column (steel or silica), may have first a deposit of a 0.1 to 1 micron film of low-TC porous glass or polymer (e.g., via pumping liquid solution through it, blowing the excess out and baking), followed by a heater metal film deposition (e.g., via mirror solutions), followed by a final GC film of porous glass or polymer. This approach combines more surface area with thermal isolation for rapid, low-power heating.
For cleaning, in case a high-boiling analyte material condenses and accumulates on the non-heated walls of the sensor structure, it may be helpful to periodically heat the whole channel support 31 wafer as well as the heater element(s) 26 while purge gas is flowing through channel 33.
The advantages of continuous heater strip 25 are that it may be easier to fabricate (with less labor), more reliable (having fewer wire bonds or contacts), more controllable (length of heated zone 34 may be controlled) and lower cost (because of no or fewer FET switches needed) of electrically connecting concentrator 19 and separator 21 heater film strip 25 to a power supply.
One may have a high adsorber-film/sample fluid flow channel volume (even with thin adsorber film thickness) which may enable greater speed of response of system 10. For film material, the spin-on glass or polymer materials are proven and reproducible products, which can be deposited in the desired thickness range (0.1 to 0.8 μm) that can be patterned. The optimizing concentrator 19 and separator 21 heater elements may maximize pre-concentration, minimize power use, optimize the injection pulse, and yet minimize the number of elements, and complexity and cost.
System 10 may have separate chips for concentrator 19 and for separator 21, as well as an off-chip flow sensor which may be regarded as detector 18, 20 and/or 22. However, such fabrication design requires plumbing connections for the sample and analyte flow 12 between these two chips having concentrator 19 and separator 21, respectively, and the risk of losing the focused and concentrated analyte volume during this transfer. Further, this design keeps the two parts of the differential thermal conductivity type gas sensor 10 apart, which may lead to significant noise levels. Another design of micro analyzer 10 layout and fabrication may integrate the sensing, concentrating and separating elements (18, 19, 20, 21 and 22) on a single chip 36, as shown in
The layout of system 10 in
The present fluid micro analyzer may have an on-one-chip integrated operations of concentration, flow sensing (and control), separation, differential thermal conductivity detection, and temperature and pressure sensing. The mounting and wire-bonding the micro analyzer chip might not be directly onto the PCB motherboard but onto a connected small daughter PCB to enable exchange of new chips without damage to the motherboard PCB.
The advantages of the on-one-chip 36 approach include no broadening of the analyte slug 12 during transfer from concentrator 19 to separator 21, the ability to sense the passage of the analyte slug 12 at the end of concentrator 19, an improved signal-to-noise ratio by virtue of no broadening of slug 12 between concentrator 19 and separator 21 and smaller temperature change disturbances between the two thermal conductivity (TC) sensing elements 18 and 22. Other advantages include the possibility to also add and integrate inlet and outlet absolute pressure sensors to determine speed of the analyte slug 12 as it moves through heating element and the daughter PCB-approach which also enables connection of differently-sized fluid analyzer heater chips with one mother PCB.
Although the invention has been described with respect to at least one illustrative embodiment, many variations and modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the present specification. It is therefore the intention that the appended claims be interpreted as broadly as possible in view of the prior art to include all such variations and modifications.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e)(1) to, now abandoned, U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/414,211, filed Sep. 27, 2002, and entitled “PHASED SENSOR”, wherein such document is incorporated herein by reference. This application also claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e)(1) to co-pending U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/432,220, filed Dec. 10, 2002, and entitled “PHASED-II SENSOR”, wherein such document is incorporated herein by reference.
The U.S. Government may have rights in the present invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3146616 | Loyd | Sep 1964 | A |
3557532 | Broerman | Jan 1971 | A |
3589171 | Haley | Jun 1971 | A |
3783356 | Lide, III et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
3925022 | Showalter et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
4043196 | Trageser | Aug 1977 | A |
4228815 | Juffa et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4324566 | Jacob et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4472355 | Hickam et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4478076 | Bohrer | Oct 1984 | A |
4483200 | Togawa et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4507974 | Yelderman | Apr 1985 | A |
4576050 | Lambert | Mar 1986 | A |
4735082 | Kolloff | Apr 1988 | A |
4759210 | Wohltjen | Jul 1988 | A |
4805441 | Sides et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4909078 | Sittler et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4944035 | Aagardl et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5031126 | McCulloch et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5044766 | Stuart | Sep 1991 | A |
5056047 | Sondergeld | Oct 1991 | A |
5135549 | Phillips et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5146414 | McKown et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5168746 | Madhusudhan et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5196039 | Phillips et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5205154 | Lee et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5243858 | Erskine et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5263380 | Sultan et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5268302 | Rounbehler et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5300758 | Rounbehler et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5313061 | Drew et al. | May 1994 | A |
5379630 | Lacey | Jan 1995 | A |
5442175 | Dawson | Aug 1995 | A |
5463899 | Zemel et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5533412 | Jerman et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5585575 | Corrigan et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5587520 | Rhodes | Dec 1996 | A |
5808178 | Rounbehler et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5922974 | Davison et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5970803 | Staples et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6016027 | DeTemple et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6131440 | Bertrand | Oct 2000 | A |
6139384 | DeTemple et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6155097 | Arnold | Dec 2000 | A |
6169965 | Kubisiak et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178811 | Bonne et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6194833 | DeTemple et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6217829 | Mustacich et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6308553 | Bonne et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311544 | Bertrand | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6386014 | Butch | May 2002 | B1 |
6393894 | Bonne et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6413781 | Geis et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6494617 | Stokes et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6497138 | Abdel-Rahman et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6497844 | Bacaud et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6527835 | Manginell et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6649129 | Neal | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6666907 | Manginell et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6732567 | Briscoe et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6837096 | Stewart | Jan 2005 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 934 566 | Mar 1981 | DE |
32 34 146 | Mar 1984 | DE |
42 22 458 | Jan 1994 | DE |
42 43 573 | Jun 1994 | DE |
296 07 315 | Sep 1996 | DE |
196 19 133 | Nov 1997 | DE |
0 232 719 | Jan 1987 | EP |
0 348 245 | Dec 1989 | EP |
0 364 982 | Apr 1990 | EP |
0 419 873 | Aug 1990 | EP |
0 468 793 | Jan 1992 | EP |
0 702 212 | Mar 1996 | EP |
0 773 432 | May 1997 | EP |
2 287 792 | Sep 1995 | GB |
56-153256 | Nov 1981 | JP |
57-131029 | Aug 1982 | JP |
57-206830 | Dec 1982 | JP |
01203970 | Aug 1989 | JP |
04093648 | Mar 1992 | JP |
WO 9206369 | Apr 1992 | WO |
WO 9420825 | Sep 1994 | WO |
WO 9822793 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 0061261 | Oct 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040129057 A1 | Jul 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60432220 | Dec 2002 | US | |
60414211 | Sep 2002 | US |