The present invention relates to concentric electrical connectors and, particularly, to the type of connector commonly known as a “phone plug” that is commonly used to connect musical instruments to amplifiers or other such equipment.
The dimensions of such plugs and associated jacks have been set according to JIS (Japan Industry Standard) whereby manufacturers of various components will be sure of interchangeability and connectivity by purchasers of components from various sources. Notwithstanding such standards, the ¼ inch diameter male phone plugs and jacks do not always mate as specified. In particular, whereas most commercially available male plugs conform closely to the standard specification, many female jacks (receptacles) are quite far out of specification. The inside of a jack usually includes some form of spring contact that is designed to contact a detent in the tip of the male plug. When the spring contact is either too short or too long in length, poor electrical contact with the plug tip degrades the musician's performance. This condition can cause the plug to have minimal retention of the plug to the jack, and in some cases the spring contact can actually push the plug out of the jack, causing total loss of electrical connection.
We have improved the shape of the standard phone plug tip to provide greater accommodation of jack springs that are out of specification.
This has been achieved by moving the convex, bulbous portion of the tip forward, away from the plug body, and increasing the length of the adjacent concave, detent portion. This change significantly increases the retention between the plug and poorly manufactured jacks, while not adversely affecting the plugs used in jacks that are made to specification.
Preferably, the annular shoulder is centered closer to the front end, the waist extends axially a longer distance, and the minimum diameter of the waist is slightly greater, than in the standard tip.
One embodiment is directed to an electric plug having a central signal shaft terminating in a tip, wherein the tip has a substantially frustoconical nose, a convex annular shoulder centered at an axial distance of less than 0.120 inch from the front end of the tip, (defining a bulbous portion) and a concave waist having a radius of curvature greater than about 0.75 inch, defining the detent adjacent to the bulbous portion.
The invention is also directed to the tip itself, which preferably has a standard threaded bore, such that the inventive tip can be substituted for a standard tip and thereby dramatically improve the performance of what was originally a standard plug.
In the various figures, numeric and alphabetical identifiers associated with structures or dimensions denote functionally identical structures or dimensions, except that a prime (') on an identifier indicates that it differs from the standard specification associated with
The tip 18 has a frustoconical nose 28 with associated minor and major diameter, which transitions into a convex annular shoulder 30, which in turn transitions into a saddle-shape, concave annular waist 32, which finally transitions to an annular base 34. As the plug 10 and jack 20 mate according to standard specifications, the convexly curved portion 36 of the jack spring rides over the nose 28 and shoulder 30 until it snaps into the detent 32 formed by the waist between the shoulder and the base. This detent prevents the fully inserted plug from axial displacement within the jack, unless the musician intentionally applies a significant axial pulling force to disengage the plug tip from the spring.
With the relationship of the standard plug 10 and out of specification jack 20 as shown in
The following Table presents a comparison of the standard dimensions, the range of values within the scope of the invention that are different from the standard dimensions, and the preferred value of the different dimensions. It can be appreciated that dimensions A through F are preferably identical to the standard dimensions, whereas dimensions G-N are different. Also, certain combinations of dimensions are different.
It should be appreciated that not all of the differences indicated in the Table are necessary to achieve a significant improvement relative to a standard plug.
One combination of noteworthy features is that the nose 28 has an increased angle G′ of at least 95° with the axis, the annular shoulder 30′ is centered at an axial distance H′ of less than 0.120 inch from the front end of the tip, and the waist has a radius of curvature J′ greater than about 0.075 inch.
Another combination of noteworthy features is that the annular shoulder 30′ is centered at an axial distance H′ from the front end of the tip substantially equal to one-half the axial distance from the front end of the tip to the center of the waist (H′+M′), i.e., whereas in the standard tip the dimension H is significantly greater than the dimension M, with applicant's preferred embodiment the dimension H′ is substantially equal to M′.
In yet another combination of significant features, for a tip having a standard overall length of about 0.334 inch, the annular shoulder 30′ is centered at an axial distance H′ of less than about 0.120 inch from the front end of the tip and the waist has a radius of curvature J′ greater than about 0.075 inch, without limitation on the nose angle G′. Preferably, the terminus of the threaded blind bore is at substantially the same axial position as the center of the shoulder 30′. This is evident in the Table, from the combined dimensions (M′+L′), or alternatively (A−H′) which each 0.225, i.e., within 0.010 inch of the dimension D of the bore length. In the corresponding standard tip, this dimension is 0.196 inch, i.e., about 0.040 less than the bore length D of 0.235 inch.
The blind bore can be smooth if the tip is to be permanently secured to a smooth extension of the signal conductor of the shaft, or the bore can be threaded to receive a threaded extension of the signal shaft.
It should be appreciated that notwithstanding the superficial similarity between the tips as depicted in
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7614918 | Wu | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7618294 | Lin et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7699665 | Yin | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7727029 | Bolin et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |