Phononic crystal desalination system and methods of use

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9796607
  • Patent Number
    9,796,607
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, February 17, 2015
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 24, 2017
    7 years ago
Abstract
Disclosed herein are systems and methods for desalination of salt water based on an engineered acoustic field that causes constructive and destructive interference at precomputed spatial positions. The engineered acoustic field can cause high-pressure and low-pressure regions where desalination membranes are located. The induced pressure from the acoustic field can force pure water through the membranes leaving ionic and dissolved molecular species behind.
Description
BACKGROUND

The basis for phononic crystals-dates back to Isaac Newton who imagined that sound waves propagated through air in the same way that an elastic wave would propagate along a lattice of point masses connected by springs with an elastic force constant E, the force constant being identical to the modulus of the material. The field of phononic crystals and our theoretical understanding of them have steadily grown since that time (see, for example, Joannopoulos, R. D. Meade and J. N. Winn, Photonic Crystals, Molding the Flow of Light (Princeton University Press, Princeton (1995); Garcia et al., “Theory for Tailoring Sonic Devices: Diffraction Dominates over Refraction,” Phys. Rev. E 67, 046606 (2003); Kushwaha and P. Halevi, “Band-gap Engineering in Periodic Elastic Composites,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 64(9):1085-1087 (1994); Lai et al. “Engineering Acoustic Band Gaps,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 79(20): 3224-3226 (2001); Sigmund and Jensen “Systematic Design of Phononic Band-Gap Materials and Structures by Topology Optimization,” Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 361:1001-1019 (2003), Caballero et al. “Large Two-Dimensional Sonic Band Gaps,” Phys. Rev. E 60:(6):R6316-R6319 (1999); and Sliwa and Krawczyk “The Effect of Material Parameters Values on the Relation Between Energy Gap Width and the Scattering Symmetry in Two-Dimensional Phononic Crystals,” arXiv:cond-mat/05022 (2005).


SUMMARY

Disclosed herein are methods, systems, apparatus, and/or articles as described and/or illustrated herein. In an implementation, disclosed is a system and method for desalination of salt water based on an engineered acoustic field that causes constructive and destructive interference at pre-computed spatial positions. The engineered acoustic field can cause high-pressure and low-pressure regions where desalination membranes are located. The induced pressure from the acoustic field can force pure water through the membranes leaving ionic and dissolved molecular species behind.


Disclosed herein is an apparatus including an array of tubes, wherein each tube is surrounded by a membrane and wherein the tubes are parallel to each other; a flow chamber; and one or more acoustic transducers. A fluid can flow through the flow chamber in a direction of flow. The array of tubes can also be positioned in the flow chamber so that the hollow portions of the tubes are in the direction of flow. Also, the spaces between each of the tubes in the flow chamber can form an interstitial region. Further, the acoustic transducers can be positioned so that they touch a fluid present in the flow chamber.


The membrane can include a desalination polymer. The tubes can be made up of a porous material. The array of tubes can be arranged in a hexagonal array. The wall of the flow chamber can include the acoustic transducer. The apparatus can also include two transducers. Specifically, the two transducers can cover an entire boundary or side of the flow chamber. Further, the array of tubes can be packed into a phononic crystal or a phononic crystal system.


Also disclosed herein is a method of desalinating water. The method includes creating an engineered acoustic field, wherein the engineered acoustic field creates high pressure and low pressure regions; providing a desalination membrane; and positioning a high pressure region so as to force water through the desalination membrane thereby separating solutes from the water thereby desalinating the water.


The method can also include providing an array of tubes, wherein each tube is surrounded by a membrane and wherein the tubes are parallel to each other; a flow chamber; and one or more acoustic transducers. A fluid can flow through the flow chamber in a direction of flow. The array of tubes can also be positioned in the flow chamber so that the hollow portions of the tubes are in the direction of flow. Also, the spaces between each of the tubes in the flow chamber can form an interstitial region. Further, the acoustic transducers can be positioned so that they touch a fluid present in the flow chamber.


The water to be desalinated can present in the interstitial region and the engineered acoustic field be oriented to force the water to be desalinated through the desalination membranes into the tubes. Also, the water to be desalinated can be present in the tubes and the engineered acoustic field be oriented to force the water to be desalinated through the desalination membranes into the interstitial region. Further, the array of tubes can be packed into a phononic crystal or a phononic crystal system.


Also disclosed herein is an apparatus including a guide having a two-dimensional cubic or hexagonal configuration of circular rods, wherein a phononic crystal system is built within the guide; and an acoustic pressure source positioned at a first side of the guide. The acoustic pressure source can transmit acoustic energy and can be positioned such that a box exists outside the opposite side of the guide, wherein the acoustic energy is integrated.


The circular rods can be between about 3.175 and about 9.525 mm in diameter. The circular rods can be embedded in urethane. The crystal system can surrounded by urethane. The circular rods can include a material selected from alumina, stainless steel, aluminum, nylon and porous ceramic. The acoustic energy can be of a frequency between about 10 and about 200 kHz.


The details of one or more variations of the subject matter described herein are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features and advantages of the subject matter described herein will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.





DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

Generally speaking the figures are not to scale in absolute terms or comparatively but are intended to be illustrative of claimed features. Also, relative placement of features and elements maybe modified for the purpose of illustrative clarity. Many of the figures show the components in schematic for the purpose of simplicity and are not intended to specifically show the design of the components or how they are coupled together.



FIG. 1 is a schematic configuration for computing the energy gap in various phononic crystals;



FIG. 2 is a schematic for a water desalination system having a phononic crystal of ceramic tubes;



FIG. 3 is an energy gap spectra for the phononic crystal water desalination system shown in FIG. 2;



FIG. 4 is a 50 kHz surface plot showing pressure at zero phase angle;



FIG. 5 is a 60 kHz surface plot showing pressure at zero phase angle;



FIG. 6 is a 121 kHz surface plot showing pressure at zero phase angle;



FIG. 7 is a 121 kHz surface plot showing pressure at 0 degrees phase angle and initial pressure of 10 kPa;



FIG. 8 is a 121 kHz surface plot showing pressure at 90 degrees phase angle and initial pressure of 10 kPa;



FIG. 9 is a 121 kHz surface plot showing pressure at 180 degrees phase angle and initial pressure of 10 kPa;



FIG. 10 is a graph showing voltage modulation for the 121 kHz frequency for driving the transducer.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Described herein are systems and methods for desalination and the separation of dissolved metals, salts, and organics from water by exploiting phenomena observed in phononic crystals. In particular, described herein is a method and system using phononic crystals to produce ultrasonic or acoustic standing waves at key spatial locations within the crystal where the acoustic pressure differential is sufficient to force water through a polymeric membrane at that location, and leave a concentrated brine solution behind. The high pressure differential at eighteen modes in the crystal forces pure water through the membrane leaving a concentrated brine solution and the ionic species behind in order to desalinate water. The systems and methods for desalination by membrane distillation described herein provide many advantages, for example, pure desalinated water with very low power requirements.


The elastic force constant is of key importance and is a key factor for acoustic band-gap engineering in impedance mismatch between periodic elements including the crystal and the surrounding medium. When an advancing wave-front meets a material with very high impedance it will tend to increase its phase velocity through that medium. Likewise, when an advancing wave-front meets a low impedance medium it will slow down.


For inhomogenous solids, the wave equation is given by










2



u
j
i





t
2



=


1

ρ
j




{







x
i





(

λ





u
j
i





x
l




)


+






x
l





[

μ


(





u
j
i





x
l



+




u
j
l





x
i




)


]



}






Here, ui is the ith component displacement vector. The subscript j is in reference to the medium (medium 1 or medium 2); λ, μ are the Lame coefficients, ρ is the density, and the longitudinal and transverse speed of sound are given by

cl=√{square root over ((λ+2μ)/ρ)}
ct=√{square root over (μ/ρ)}


The Lame coefficients can be expressed as Young's modulus E.

Et=ρc2
El=ρct2=λ+2μ


Young's modulus has importance to elastic vibrations in lattices. Upon performing a numerical survey of materials, lattice spacing, packing arrangements, and crystal orientations, it can be observed that as the Young's modulus increases, the width of the first (lowest frequency) band-gap also increases. This trend can be observed for both cubic (X and M direction) and hexagonal crystals (K and M directions) at several filling fractions and rod diameters.


The band-gaps in phononic crystals can be a function of material composition, lattice spacing, crystal-packing arrangement, crystal orientation, and/or size of the elements in the crystal. FIG. 1 is a schematic of a configuration that can be used for computing the energy gap in various phononic crystals. As shown in FIG. 1, a guide 100 having a two-dimensional cubic or hexagonal configuration of circular rods 110 can be used to design and build the basic crystal system 105. The guide 100 can include rods 110 embedded in a urethane impedance 115 matched with water, for example, (p=1000 kg/m3; c=1497 m/sec). To one side of the crystal system 105 can be an acoustic pressure source 120, for example to produce plane waves. On an opposite side of the crystal system 105 can be an imaginary box 125 used for integration. In this region, the acoustic energy for preparing the transmission spectra can be integrated. The boundaries 130, except for the pressure source 120, can be water impedance. In a variation, the crystal system 105 is approximately 3.5 cm×5 cm surrounded by the urethane impedance 115.


The configuration, diameter, and material of the rods 110 as well as the filling fraction can all vary. As mentioned, the rods 110 can be in a two-dimensional cubic or hexagonal configuration. The rod diameter used can be, for example, 3.175 mm (0.125″), 6.35 mm (0.25″), and 9.525 mm (0.375″). The filling fractions used can be, for example, 0.90699, 0.403066, and 0.29613. Using all three rod diameters and all three filling fractions results in nine possible combinations. For the cubic crystals, X and M directions can be used. For the hexagonally-packed crystals, K and M directions can be used. The material of the rods 110 can vary, including alumina (p=3860 kg/m3; c=10520 m/sec; E=3.61×1011 Pa), stainless steel (p=7850 kg/m3; c=5790 m/sec; E=1.03×1011 Pa), aluminum (p=2700 kg/m3; c=6420 m/sec; E=6.9×1010 Pa) and nylon (p=1130 kg/m3; c=2675 m/sec; E=2.4×109 Pa) or other appropriate material. In an embodiment, the material is a porous ceramic. For each rod material combination, the acoustic properties for eighteen different crystals/orientations can be analyzed. As mentioned, the frequency can vary. The frequency can be between about 10 kHz to about 200 kHz. In a variation, X and M directions can be used in cubic and K and M directions in hexagonal polyester (p=1350 kg/m3; c=2100 m/sec; E=4.41×109 Pa)) and graphite (p=2200 kg/m3; c=3310 m/sec; E=2.41×1010 Pa) packed in urethane. The width and center frequency for the first band gap can be a function of the Young's modulus. The lattice spacing can be a function of the filling fraction and the rod diameter. Band gaps for materials having a modulus nearing that of the impedance will not as pronounced. For example, the band gap for nylon will not be as pronounced as alumina, steel or aluminum.


The systems and methods for desalination of water described herein incorporate an engineered acoustic field that can cause constructive and destructive interference at spatial positions identified using the modeling system described above. The engineered acoustic field can cause high-pressure and low-pressure regions where desalination membranes can be positioned. The induced pressure from the acoustic field can force pure water through the membranes leaving ionic and dissolved molecular species behind.



FIG. 2 is a schematic of a water desalination system 200 having a phononic crystal. The system 200 can be a parallel array of tubes 205 coated with a membrane 207 and packed in a specific arrangement, such as a hexagonal array. The tubes 205 can be manufactured of a porous material. In an embodiment, the tubes 205 are manufactured of a porous ceramic material. The membrane 207 coating the tubes 205 can be a thin layer of polymer such as a desalination polymer. The membrane 207 can allow water molecules to pass through and prevent the passage of the ionic species and dissolved organics (larger molecules) leaving them behind.


The arrangement of porous tubes 205 coated with a desalination polymeric membrane 207 can be packed into a phononic crystal. The tubes 205 can be arranged in parallel configuration or any regular polygon or circular cross-sectional shape. The arrangement of tubes 205 can be packed into a larger tube or container such as a flow chamber 215 having a generally small cross-section. The chamber 215 can be rectangular, a regular polygon, circular or other cross-sectional shape. In one variation, the cross-section of the flow chamber 215 is about 10 cm×6 cm. The chamber 215 can be a metal material.


Water to be desalinated can flow through the interstitial region 210 between the tubes 205 (perpendicular to the diagram) such that the inside of the tubes 205 are initially kept empty. Alternatively, water to be desalinated can flow through the inside of the tubes 205 and the interstitial regions 210 kept empty. The membrane 207 coating the tubes 205 allows fresh water to pass therethrough. Depending upon the configuration of the system 200, the pure water can flow from the interstitial region 210 into and through the tubes 205. Alternatively, the pure water can flow from the tubes 205 into and through the interstitial region 210.


The arrangement of tubes 205 within the chamber 215 can be positioned adjacent to one or more acoustic transducers (not shown). The transducers can be located at one or more boundaries of the flow chamber 215 such that the transducers contact the water to be desalinated. Alternatively, the walls of the chamber 215 can act as the acoustic transducer. The packing arrangement of the tubes 205 can vary as can the number of transducers, their arrangement, and the acoustic frequency selected. In a variation, two adjacent transducers can be selected such that they cover an entire boundary or side of the flow chamber 215.


When these transducers are powered up, such as by an alternating current, they can induce a complex acoustic standing wave in the surrounding tubes 205 due to constructive and destructive interference. Stable nodes of very high-pressure differential can be produced over small spatial areas. By tuning the placement of the tubes 205 and adjusting the resonance frequency of the transducer(s), water molecules can be forced through the membrane 207 and into the empty tubes 205 (or the reverse situation, depending on tuning of the system). Each transducer can operate at a variety of resonances as will be described in more detail below. The membranes 207 can be positioned at these calculated nodes of high pressure differential. Alternatively, the stable nodes of very high-pressure differential can be tuned to the location of where the membranes 207 are positioned.



FIG. 3 shows the energy gap spectra for the phononic crystal water desalination system 200 of FIG. 2. FIG. 4 shows the surface pressure in the device when the two transducers are in phase (zero phase angle) and operating at 50 kHz as well as the lines of pressure modulations. Between the red and blue regions the pressure differential can be as high as 200 MPa. In the figure, the pressure units are an arbitrary scale. Optical techniques known in the art can be used to measure pressure of this magnitude where the deflection of a HeNe laser beam indicates refractive index variation from which one can calculate the pressure variation (Higginson et al. “Tunable optics derived from nonlinear acoustic effects”, J. Appl. Phys. 95 (10) 5896-5904 (2004)). This can depend on the input voltage to the transducer.



FIGS. 5 and 6 show two different surface pressure plots showing pressure at zero phase angle at frequencies 60 kHz and 121 kHz, respectively. It should be appreciated that a variety of frequencies is acceptable. In a variation, the frequency is below about 150 kHz. In another variation, the frequency is between about 60 kHz and about 150 kHz; between about 70 kHz and about 140 kHz; between about 80 kHz and about 130 kHz; between about 90 kHz and about 120 kHz. In a variation, the frequency is 121 kHz. It is possible to have regions of both high and low pressure within a single tube at the same time. These high-low regions can oscillate in position depending on the phase angle. It should be appreciated that this should be avoided. In an embodiment, lowering the frequency can eliminate such occurrences.



FIGS. 7, 8, and 9 show the phononic crystal of FIG. 2 at 121 kHz and showing pressure at 0, 90, and 180 phase angle, respectively, and initial pressure of 10 kPa. In the 0 phase angle (see FIG. 7), the pattern of positive and negative pressures are opposite of those of the 180 phase pattern (see FIG. 9). The pressure pattern in the 90 degree phase (shown in FIG. 8) is orthogonal to these. In this variation, pure water is on the inside of the tubes 205. Acoustic phase angle problems can be circumvented by filling some tubes with polyurethane and modulated the drive frequency on the transducers. For example, the tubes not specifically designed to be active (i.e. where there is no high or lower pressure node) can be filled with polyurethane acoustic impedance matched to water such that the pattern is not disturbed. To eliminate the opposite phase pressure, which can act as a reverse pump, the. drive frequency can be modulated as shown in FIG. 10. This modulated drive can provide a one-way pump action from the acoustics and drive the water molecules through the membrane 207 on the outside of the porous ceramic tubes 205.


While this specification contains many specifics, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of what is claimed or of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features specific to particular variations. Certain features that are described in this specification in the context of separate variations can also be implemented in combination in a single variation. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single variation can also be implemented in multiple variations separately or in any suitable sub-combination. Moreover, although features may be described above as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can in some cases be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a sub-combination or a variation of a sub-combination. Similarly, while operations are depicted in the drawings in a particular order, this should not be understood as requiring that such operations be performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, or that all illustrated operations be performed, to achieve desirable results. Only a few examples and implementations are disclosed. Variations, modifications and enhancements to the described examples and implementations and other implementations may be made based on what is disclosed.

Claims
  • 1. A method of desalinating salt water, comprising: (a) creating an engineered acoustic field, wherein the engineered acoustic field creates high pressure and low pressure regions;(b) providing an array of tubes, wherein each tube is surrounded by a polymeric membrane, wherein spaces between the tubes form an interstitial region, and the array of tubes is packed into a phononic crystal; and(c) positioning the high pressure regions so as to force water molecules through the polymeric membranes of the array of tubes, thereby separating solutes from the water molecules, thereby desalinating the salt water.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising providing a flow chamber; andone or more acoustic transducers,wherein the array of tubes is positioned in the flow chamber so that hollow portions of the tubes are in a direction of flow, wherein the tubes are parallel to each other, and wherein the one or more acoustic transducers are positioned so that they touch the salt water present in the flow chamber.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the salt water is present in the interstitial region and wherein the engineered acoustic field is oriented to force the water molecules through the polymeric membranes into the tubes.
  • 4. The method of claim 2, wherein the salt water is present in the tubes and wherein the engineered acoustic field is oriented to force the water molecules through the polymeric membranes into the interstitial region.
  • 5. A method of desalinating salt water, comprising: (a) creating an engineered acoustic field, wherein the engineered acoustic field creates high pressure and low pressure regions;(b) providing a polymeric membrane;(c) positioning the high pressure region so as to force water molecules through the polymeric membrane, thereby separating solutes from the water molecules, thereby desalinating the salt water; andwherein the engineered acoustic field is created by an apparatus comprising:a guide having a two-dimensional cubic or hexagonal configuration of circular rods, wherein a phononic crystal system is built within the guide; andan acoustic pressure source positioned at a first side of the guide, wherein the acoustic pressure source transmits acoustic energy and wherein the acoustic pressure source is positioned such that a box exists outside the opposite side of the guide, wherein the acoustic energy is integrated.
  • 6. The method of claim 2, wherein each tube of the array of tubes is a circular tube.
  • 7. A method of desalinating salt water, comprising: (a) creating an engineered acoustic field, wherein the engineered acoustic field creates high pressure and low pressure regions;(b) providing a flow chamber and an array of tubes, wherein each tube is surrounded by a polymeric membrane and wherein the tubes are parallel to each other with spaces between the tubes in the flow chamber forming an interstitial region;(c) positioning the high pressure regions so as to force water molecules through the polymeric membranes, thereby separating solutes from the water molecules thereby desalinating the salt water.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, wherein the salt water is present in the interstitial region and wherein the engineered acoustic field is oriented to force the water molecules through the polymeric membranes into the tubes.
  • 9. The method of claim 7, wherein the salt water is present in the tubes and wherein the engineered acoustic field is oriented to force the water molecules through the polymeric membranes into the interstitial region.
  • 10. The method of claim 7, further comprising providing one or more acoustic transducers, wherein the one or more acoustic transducers are located at one or more boundaries of the flow chamber.
  • 11. The method of claim 7, wherein each tube of the array of tubes is a circular tube.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, where selected tubes are filled with a material that is impedance matched to pure water so that nodes of high-pressure differential in the phononic crystal are tuned to the location of where the membranes are positioned.
  • 13. The method of claim 12, where the impedance matched material is polyurethane.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/162,463, filed Jun. 16, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,956,538, which claimed the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/355,421, filed on Jun. 16, 2010, entitled, “Phononic Crystal Desalination System and Methods of Use”, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein.

US Referenced Citations (142)
Number Name Date Kind
2473971 Ross Jun 1949 A
2667944 Crites Feb 1954 A
3555311 Weber Jan 1971 A
4055491 Porath-Furedi Oct 1977 A
4158629 Sawyer Jun 1979 A
4165273 Azarov et al. Aug 1979 A
4173725 Asai et al. Nov 1979 A
4204096 Barcus et al. May 1980 A
4398325 Piaget et al. Aug 1983 A
4552669 Sekellick Nov 1985 A
4666595 Graham May 1987 A
4699588 Zinn et al. Oct 1987 A
4743361 Schram May 1988 A
4759775 Peterson et al. Jul 1988 A
4836684 Javorik et al. Jun 1989 A
4983189 Peterson et al. Jan 1991 A
5062965 Bernou Nov 1991 A
5164094 Stuckart Nov 1992 A
5225089 Benes et al. Jul 1993 A
5371429 Manna Dec 1994 A
5395592 Bolleman et al. Mar 1995 A
5443985 Lu et al. Aug 1995 A
5452267 Spevak Sep 1995 A
5484537 Whitworth Jan 1996 A
5527460 Trampler et al. Jun 1996 A
5560362 Sliwa, Jr. et al. Oct 1996 A
5594165 Madanshetty Jan 1997 A
5604301 Mountford et al. Feb 1997 A
5626767 Trampler et al. May 1997 A
5688405 Dickinson et al. Nov 1997 A
5711888 Trampler et al. Jan 1998 A
5831166 Kozuka et al. Nov 1998 A
5834871 Puskas Nov 1998 A
5902489 Yasuda et al. May 1999 A
5912182 Coakley et al. Jun 1999 A
5951456 Scott Sep 1999 A
6090295 Raghavarao et al. Jul 2000 A
6166231 Hoeksema Dec 2000 A
6205848 Faber et al. Mar 2001 B1
6216538 Yasuda et al. Apr 2001 B1
6273262 Yasuda et al. Aug 2001 B1
6332541 Coakley et al. Dec 2001 B1
6391653 Letcher et al. May 2002 B1
6482327 Mori et al. Nov 2002 B1
6487095 Malik et al. Nov 2002 B1
6592821 Wada et al. Jul 2003 B1
6649069 DeAngelis Nov 2003 B2
6763722 Fjield et al. Jul 2004 B2
6881314 Wang et al. Apr 2005 B1
6929750 Laurell et al. Aug 2005 B2
6936151 Lock et al. Aug 2005 B1
7008540 Weavers et al. Mar 2006 B1
7010979 Scott Mar 2006 B2
7061163 Nagahara et al. Jun 2006 B2
7081192 Wang et al. Jul 2006 B1
7093482 Berndt Aug 2006 B2
7108137 Lal et al. Sep 2006 B2
7150779 Meegan, Jr. Dec 2006 B2
7186502 Vesey Mar 2007 B2
7191787 Redeker et al. Mar 2007 B1
7322431 Ratcliff Jan 2008 B2
7331233 Scott Feb 2008 B2
7340957 Kaduchak et al. Mar 2008 B2
7373805 Hawkes et al. May 2008 B2
7541166 Belgrader et al. Jun 2009 B2
7601267 Haake et al. Oct 2009 B2
7673516 Janssen et al. Mar 2010 B2
7837040 Ward et al. Nov 2010 B2
7846382 Strand et al. Dec 2010 B2
7968049 Takahashi et al. Jun 2011 B2
8080202 Takahashi et al. Dec 2011 B2
8134705 Kaduchak et al. Mar 2012 B2
8256076 Feller Sep 2012 B1
8266950 Kaduchak et al. Sep 2012 B2
8273253 Curran Sep 2012 B2
8273302 Takahashi et al. Sep 2012 B2
8309408 Ward et al. Nov 2012 B2
8319398 Vivek et al. Nov 2012 B2
8334133 Fedorov et al. Dec 2012 B2
8387803 Thorslund et al. Mar 2013 B2
8476060 Chianelli et al. Jul 2013 B2
8691145 Dionne et al. Apr 2014 B2
8714360 Swayze et al. May 2014 B2
8772004 Schafran et al. Jul 2014 B2
8865452 Radaelli et al. Oct 2014 B2
8873051 Kaduchak et al. Oct 2014 B2
20020038662 Schuler et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020134734 Campbell et al. Sep 2002 A1
20030028108 Miller et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030195496 Maguire Oct 2003 A1
20030209500 Kock et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030230535 Affeld et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040016699 Bayevsky Jan 2004 A1
20050031499 Meier Feb 2005 A1
20050121269 Namuduri Jun 2005 A1
20050145567 Quintel et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050196725 Fu Sep 2005 A1
20060037915 Strand et al. Feb 2006 A1
20070272618 Gou et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070284299 Xu et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080105625 Rosenberg et al. May 2008 A1
20080217259 Siversson Sep 2008 A1
20080245709 Kaduchak et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090029870 Ward et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090045107 Ward et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090053686 Ward et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090098027 Tabata et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090104594 Webb Apr 2009 A1
20090178716 Kaduchak et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090194420 Mariella, Jr. et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090295505 Mohammadi et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100000945 Gavalas Jan 2010 A1
20100078384 Yang Apr 2010 A1
20100124142 Laugharn et al. May 2010 A1
20100139377 Huang et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100192693 Mudge et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100193407 Steinberg et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100206818 Leong et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100255573 Bond et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100261918 Chianelli et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100317088 Radaelli et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100323342 Gonzalez Gomez et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100330633 Walther et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110003350 Schafran et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110024335 Ward et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110092726 Clarke Apr 2011 A1
20110095225 Eckelberry et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110123392 Dionne et al. May 2011 A1
20110154890 Holm et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110166551 Schafer Jul 2011 A1
20110262990 Wang et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110281319 Swayze et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110309020 Rietman et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120088295 Yasuda et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120267288 Chen et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120328477 Dionne et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120329122 Lipkens et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130175226 Coussios et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130277316 Dutra et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130277317 LoRicco et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130284271 Lipkens et al. Oct 2013 A1
20140011240 Lipkens et al. Jan 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (16)
Number Date Country
30 27 433 Feb 1982 DE
196 48 519 Jun 1998 DE
10 2008 006 501 Sep 2008 DE
0 292 470 Nov 1988 EP
1 254 669 Nov 2002 EP
2 420 510 May 2006 GB
9-136090 May 1997 JP
WO 8707178 Dec 1987 WO
WO 9005008 May 1990 WO
WO 02072234 Sep 2002 WO
WO 2009111276 Sep 2009 WO
WO 2009144709 Dec 2009 WO
WO 2010024753 Apr 2010 WO
WO 2011023949 Mar 2011 WO
WO 2011027146 Mar 2011 WO
WO 2011161463 Dec 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (32)
Entry
Alvarez et al.; Shock Waves, vol. 17, No. 6, pp. 441-447, 2008.
Benes et al.; Ultrasonic Separation of Suspended Particles, 2001 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium; Oct. 7-10, 2001; pp. 649-659; Atlanta, Georgia.
Castro; Tunable gap and quantum quench dynamics in bilayer graphene; Jul. 13, 2010; Mathematica Summer School.
Cravotto et al.; Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 898-902, 2008.
Garcia-Lopez, et al; Enhanced Acoustic Separation of Oil-Water Emulsion in Resonant Cavities. The Open Acoustics Journal. 2008, vol. 1, pp. 66-71.
Gor'Kov; On the forces acting on a small particle in an acoustical field in an ideal fluid; Soy. Phys. Dokl.; vol. 6, pp. 773-775; 1962.
Hill et al.; Ultrasonic Particle Manipulation; Microfluidic Technologies for Miniaturized Analysis Systems, Jan. 2007, pp. 359-378.
Kuznetsova et al.; Microparticle concentration in short path length ultrasonic resonators: Roles of radiation pressure and acoustic streaming; Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, American Institute of Physics for the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 116, No. 4, Oct. 1, 2004, pp. 1956-1966, DOI: 1.1121/1.1785831.
Latt et al.; Ultrasound-membrane hybrid processes for enhancement of filtration properties; Ultrasonics sonochemistry 13.4 (2006): 321-328.
Lipkens et al.; Frequency sweeping and fluid flow effects on particle trajectories in ultrasonic standing waves; Acoustics 08, Paris, Jun. 29-Jul. 4, 2008.
Lipkens et al.: “Macro-scale acoustophoretic separation of lipid particles from red blood cells”, J. of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 133, Jun. 2, 2013, p. 045017, XP055162509, New York, NY. ISSN: 0001-4966, DOI: 10.1121/1.4799371.
Lipkens et al.; Prediction and measurement of particle velocities in ultrasonic standing waves; J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 124 No. 4, pp. 2492 (A) 2008.
Lipkens et al.; Separation of micron-sized particles in macro-scale cavities by ultrasonic standing waves; Presented at the International Congress on Ultrasonics, Santiago; Jan. 11-17, 2009.
Lipkens et al.; The effect of frequency sweeping and fluid flow on particle trajectories in ultrasonic standing waves; IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 8, No. 6, pp. 667-677, 2008.
Meribout et a.; An Industrial-Prototype Acoustic Array for Real-Time Emulsion Layer Detection in Oil Storage Tanks; IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 9, No. 12, Dec. 2009.
Nilsson et al.; Review of cell and particle trapping in microfluidic systems; Department of Measurement Technology and Industrial Electrical Engineering, Div. of Nanobiotechnology, Lund University, P.O. Box 118. Lund, Sweden, Analytica Chimica Acta 649, Jul. 14, 2009, pp. 141-157.
Pangu et al.; Droplet transport and coalescence kinetics in emulsions subjected to acoustic fields; Ultrasonics 46, pp. 289-302 (2007).
Ponomarenko et al.; Density of states and zero Landau level probed through capacitance of graphene; Nature Nanotechnology Letters, Jul. 5, 2009; DOI: 10.1038/NNANO.2009.177.
Seymour et al, J. Chem. Edu., 1990, 67(9), p. 763, published Sep. 1990.
Wang et al., “Retention and Viability Characteristics of Manmmalian Cells in an Acoustically Driven Polymer Mesh”, Biotechnol. Prog., Jan.-Feb. 2004; pp. 384-385.
Annex to Form PCT/ISA/206—Communication Relating to the Results of the Partial International Search Report, dated Jul. 18, 2013.
European Search Report of European Application No. 11769474.5 Dated Oct. 10, 2012.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 20, 2011, for corresponding PCT application No. PCT/US2011/032181.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 27, 2012, for PCT application No. PCT/US2011/040787.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of International Application No. PCT/US2013/037404 Dated Jun. 21, 2013.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of International Application No. PCT/US2013/050729 Dated Sep. 25, 2013.
International Search Report for corresponding PCT Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/015382 dated May 6, 2014.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of International Application No. PCT/US2015/010595 dated Apr. 15, 2015.
Phys. Org. “Engineers develop revolutionary nanotech water desalination membrane.” Nov. 6, 2006. http://phys.org/news82047372.html.
“Proceedings of the Acoustics 2012 Nantes Conference,” Apr. 23-27, 2012, Nantes, France, pp. 278-282.
Sony New Release: <http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/News/Press/201010/10-137E/index.html>.
European Search Report of European Application No. 11796470.0 dated Jan. 5, 2016.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20150158743 A1 Jun 2015 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61355421 Jun 2010 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13162463 Jun 2011 US
Child 14623906 US