The present invention relates to light emitting diodes and diode lamps in which a phosphor is used to absorb and modify the primary emission from the diode. In particular, the invention relates to light emitting diodes that emit in the blue, violet, and ultraviolet (UV) portions of the electromagnetic spectrum used in conjunction with an encapsulant package that contains a phosphor that down-converts the frequencies emitted by the diode into light with a strong yellow component to produce a combined output of white light.
Light emitting diodes (LEDs) are a class of photonic semiconductor devices that convert an applied electric current into light by encouraging electron-hole recombination events in an appropriate semiconductor material. In turn, some or all of the energy released in the recombination event produces a photon.
Light emitting diodes share a number of the favorable characteristics of other semiconductor devices. These include generally robust physical characteristics, long lifetime, high reliability, and, depending upon the particular materials, low cost.
A number of terms are used herein that are common and well-understood in the industry. In such industry use, however, these terms are sometimes informally blended in their meaning. Accordingly, these terms will be used as precisely as possible herein, but in every case their meaning will be clear in context.
Accordingly, the term “diode” or “chip” typically refers to the structure that minimally includes two semiconductor portions of opposite conductivity types (p and n) along with some form of ohmic contacts through which electric current is applied to the resulting p-n junction.
The term “lamp” is used to designate a light emitting diode that is matched with an appropriate electrical contact and potentially a lens to form a discrete device that can be added to or included in electrical circuits or lighting fixtures or both.
As used herein, the term “package” typically refers to the placement of the semiconductor chip on an appropriate physical and electrical structure (sometimes as simple as a small piece of metal through which the electrical current is applied) along with a lens that provides some physical protection to the diode and can optically direct the light output. Lenses are often formed of transparent polymers and in some cases the same polymer forms an encapsulant for the diode. In the present context, the package includes a reflective structure, frequently formed of a metal or polymer within which the diode rests. Adding a lens and electrical contacts typically forms a lamp.
Appropriate references about the structure and operation of light emitting diodes and diode lamps include Sze, PHYSICS OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES, 2d Edition (1981) and Schubert, LIGHT-EMITTING DIODES, Cambridge University Press (2003).
The color emitted by an LED is largely defined by the material from which it is formed. Diodes formed of gallium arsenide (GaAs) and gallium phosphide (GaP) tend to emit photons in the lower energy (red and yellow) portions of the visible spectrum. Materials such as silicon carbide (SiC) and the Group III nitrides (e.g., AlGaN, InGaN, AlInGaN) have larger bandgaps and thus can generate photons with greater energy that appear in the green, blue and violet portions of the visible spectrum as well as in the ultraviolet portions of the electromagnetic spectrum. In particular the Group III nitrides have a direct bandgap and thus generate light more efficiently than indirect bandgap semiconductors such as SiC.
In the present application, the term “white light” is used in a general sense. Those familiar with the generation of colors and of color perception by the human eye will recognize that particular blends of frequencies can be defined as “white” for precise purposes. Although some of the diodes described herein can produce such precise output, the term “white” is used somewhat more broadly herein and includes light that different individuals or detectors would perceive as having a slight tint toward, for example, yellow or blue.
As the availability of blue-emitting LEDs has greatly increased, the use of yellow-emitting phosphors that down-convert the blue photons has likewise increased. Specifically, the combination of the blue light emitted by the diode and the yellow light emitted by the phosphor can create white light. In turn, the availability of white light from solid-state sources provides the capability to incorporate them in a number of applications, particularly including illumination and as lighting (frequently backlighting) for color displays. In such devices (e.g., flat computer screens, personal digital assistants, and cell phones), the blue LED and yellow phosphor produce white light which is then distributed in some fashion to illuminate the color pixels. Such color pixels are often formed by a combination of liquid crystal elements, color filters and polarizers, and the entire unit including the backlighting is generally referred to as a liquid crystal display. (“LCD”).
Typical phosphors include minerals such as cerium-doped YAG (yttrium-aluminum-garnet). Because such phosphors are typically manufactured in the form of small particles, they must be physically dispersed as small particles on or near the diode chip. Similarly, because the encapsulant is typically a polymer resin, it typically takes the initial form of a liquid that at some point must be cast or molded into the desired shape (e.g., for a lens) and then cured into a solid form.
Accordingly, several basic combinations exist for positioning the phosphor with respect to the chip. First, the phosphor can be spread onto the chip after which the encapsulant can be added as a liquid and then allowed to cure. Although this is conceptually attractive, adding the mineral phosphor to precisely cover the chip before ever adding the encapsulant is a difficult process. As a result, its relative complexity can lower the overall rate of production while increasing the overall cost.
Theoretically, the chip could be encapsulated and then a resin coating added to the exterior of the resin, but in many cases this would produce an undesired optical result and would also prevent the encapsulant from protecting the phosphor.
Many conventional techniques for incorporating the phosphor mix the phosphor with the resin and then apply the resin-phosphor mixture to the chip. The resin is then allowed to cure with the phosphor dispersed within it.
This technique presents several challenges. First, the amount of phosphor controls the color point between the chip (e.g., blue-emitting) and the fully saturated color (e.g., yellow) of the phosphor. For the blue-chip, yellow-phosphor combination, the balance required to produce a consistent hue of white is achieved by controlling the phosphor used in the encapsulant and the amount of phosphor and encapsulant (resin) dispensed on, over, or around the chip.
As a more challenging issue, the position of the phosphor in the encapsulant with respect to the diode chip will usually affect the brightness or color uniformity of the lamp's external output. An undesired position of the phosphor can produce an undesired pattern of external output in which the output varies spatially among various shades of white.
In general, positioning the phosphor as close as possible to the chip produces the most desirable output.
Because of these and other factors, the resin-encapsulant-phosphor mixture must contain an appropriate amount of phosphor particles which are themselves of an appropriate size and in appropriate geometric relationship to the chip and to the cured encapsulant. Because the uncured resin is a liquid, however, its viscosity will affect the manner in which the phosphor will mix. If the viscosity of the resin is too low, the phosphor particles may settle within the encapsulant before it is dispensed into the package which causes undesired variation in the resulting color output. Alternatively, if the viscosity of the resin is too high, the phosphor particles will remain suspended within the encapsulant and fail to settle near the chip.
In order to deal with these difficulties, most conventional techniques attempt to maintain the viscosity of the uncured resin within a range that permits the phosphor to settle within the encapsulant under the influence of gravity. This in turn requires controlling the length of time (“working time”) during which the resin will cure—the phosphor should reach the desired position(s) before the resin cures—as well as the temperature in an effort to maintain a favorable viscosity while the phosphor is settling. For example, at room temperature (25.degree. C.), a typical 2-part silicon resin (e.g. SR-7010 from Dow Corning) will normally cure in about one minute at 150.degree. C. and its viscosity will double (from respective starting points of about 20000 and 7000 millipascal for the parts) in about three (3) hours at room temperature.
As illustrative extremes, if the size of the resin particles is extremely fine and the viscosity of the resin is quite high, the phosphor will tend to remain suspended without settling or depositing in the desired manner. Alternatively, if the particles are too large and the resin viscosity too low, the phosphor will simply sink to the bottom of the resin before it can be dispensed into the lamp package. Based on these and other factors, the choice of resin, phosphor and other variables often represents a compromise.
Accordingly, the difficulties and complexities presented by phosphor-resin mixtures create and present corresponding difficulties in the efficiency and cost of diode packaging techniques.
In one aspect the invention is a method of manufacturing an LED lamp comprising admixing an uncured curable liquid resin and a phosphor, dispensing the uncured admixture on an LED chip, centrifuging the chip and the admixture to settle or deposit the phosphor particles in the uncured resin, and curing the resin while the phosphor particles remain distributed at or near the desired positions.
In another aspect the invention is an apparatus for manufacturing light emitting diode lamps. The apparatus includes a centrifuge having at least one arm, a cup positioned adjacent the outer end of the arm, an LED chip in the cup, and an admixture in the cup of an uncured curable resident with a plurality of phosphor particles.
In yet another aspect, the invention is a method of manufacturing an LED lamp comprising admixing an uncured polysiloxane resin and a phosphor that emits predominantly in the yellow portion of the spectrum when excited by frequencies from the blue portion of the visible spectrum, placing the uncured admixture and an LED chip formed from the Group III nitride material system and that emits in the blue portion of the visible spectrum into a reflector cup, centrifuging the reflector and the admixture to settle or deposit the phosphor particles in the uncured polysiloxane resin, and curing the resin while the phosphor particles remain distributed at or near the desired positions.
The foregoing and other objects and advantages of the invention and the manner in which the same are accomplished will become clearer based on the followed detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
The invention is a method of manufacturing a light emitting diode (LED) lamp. The method comprises admixing an uncured curable liquid resin and a phosphor, dispensing the uncured admixture on an LED chip, centrifuging (or otherwise exerting centrifugal force on) the chip and the admixture to position the phosphor particles in the uncured resin, and then curing the resin while the phosphor particles remain positioned on or near the desired surface of the diode.
As used herein, the phrase “uncured curable liquid resin” typically refers to a polymer resin that has not yet become cross-linked (e.g. thermosetting resins), or solidified based on temperature (thermoplastic resins). Thus, in some cases the uncured resin is a liquid at room temperature that will cross-link under the influence of heat, or time or (in some cases) ultraviolet light. In other cases, the uncured resin is a liquid at elevated temperatures and will solidify at temperatures approaching room temperature.
The resin (sometimes referred to as the “encapsulant”) can be any material that is suitable for the purposes of the invention and that does not otherwise interfere with the operation of the LED chip or the other elements of the lamp. The term “resin” is used in a broad sense to refer to any polymer, copolymer or composite from which the package can be formed. These materials are generally well understood by those of ordinary skill in the art and need not be discussed in detail.
As set forth in co-pending and commonly assigned application Ser. No. 60/824,385 filed Sep. 1, 2006 for “Phosphor Position In Light Emitting Diodes,” when the LED chip emits in the higher energy portions of the spectrum (e.g., blue, violet, and ultraviolet), the encapsulant should be less reactive or inert to the photons emitted at such frequencies. Thus, the polysiloxane (“silicone”) resins tend to be particularly well suited for the encapsulant. In general, the term polysiloxane refers to any polymer constructed on a backbone of —(—Si—O—).sub.n— (typically with organic side groups). The polysiloxane resins offer greater stability with respect to higher frequency emissions as compared to the photostability of otherwise functionally similar materials such as polycarbonate or polyester resins (both of which may be acceptable in certain contexts). Polysiloxane resins also have high optical clarity, can be favorably elastomeric, and are less affected by thermal cycling than are some other polymers. They can be formulated with a range of refractive indices (1.40 to 1.58), a factor that can be used to reduce interfacial losses and enhance a lamp's external output. Viscosities of polysiloxane resins can range about 7000 to 20,000 millipascal-seconds, and the invention can be carried out with resins (or other liquids) having viscosities of less than 10 and up to 100,000 millipascal-seconds.
As noted earlier, the term LED chip refers to the basic semiconductor structure that emits the desired frequencies. As noted in the background, the structure and operation of light emitting diodes is well understood by persons of skill in this art and need not be discussed in detail herein. Exemplary structures are, however, typically formed from the Group III nitride material system and commercial examples are available from Cree, Inc., the assignee of the present invention, for example under the XLAMP® XR-E designation. Although the boundaries are somewhat arbitrary, blue light tends to fall in the 440-470 nanometer range and thus the blue-emitting XLAMP® XR-E chips will typically have a predominant wavelength of between about 450 and 465 nanometers. Other exemplary chips emit in other portions (e.g., red and green) of the spectrum and the invention can be applied to these as well.
The phosphor particles are selected to produce or enhance a given chip emission and to suit or enhance a particular application. In many cases, the phosphor is selected from among those materials that down-convert frequencies in the blue portion of the visible spectrum into frequencies in the yellow portion of the visible spectrum. Again, those persons skilled in this art will recognize that the phosphor need not emit exclusively in the yellow portion of the spectrum, but that a predominant emission in the yellow portion is helpful because the combination of blue light from the diode chips and yellow frequencies from the phosphor produces the desired white light. Again, the boundaries are somewhat arbitrary, but the yellow frequencies are generally in the 550-600 nanometer range with 570 nanometers being representative. In other embodiments, red-emitting, green-emitting and in some cases even blue-emitting phosphors can be added to produce a “warmer” white or to achieve a higher color rendering Index (CRI).
Depending upon the nature and amount of the phosphor, the combination of the chip and phosphor can produce “cool white” light with a color temperature of between about 5000 and 10,000 K, or “neutral white” (3700-5000 K) or “warm white” (2600-3700 K). The term “color temperature” is used in its well-understood sense to represent the temperature to which a theoretical “black body” would be heated to produce light of the same visual color.
One of the phosphors most useful for purposes of the invention is the yttrium aluminum garnet (“YAG”), typically doped with cerium. Other garnet structures that emit in the yellow region are known in the art (e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 6,669,866). White light can also be produced using LEDs that emit in the near-ultraviolet portion of the spectrum with combinations of red, blue and green emitting phosphors. For example, europium-doped strontium gallium sulfide (SrGa.sub.2S.sub.4:Eu) emits in the green portion of the spectrum while cerium-doped, gadolinium aluminum oxide (Gd.sub.3Al.sub.5O.sub.12:Ce) is excited at frequencies of about 470 nanometers and emits in the orange portion (about 525-620 nm) of the spectrum. Zinc sulfide doped with copper also emits in the green portion of the spectrum. Europium-doped nitridosilicates can emit in the yellow to red portion of the spectrum (e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 6,649,946).
It will thus be understood that although the invention is primarily described herein in terms of blue LEDs, yellow-emitting phosphors, and white LED lamps, the invention applies to any chip and phosphor combination that is enhanced by positioning the phosphor in the manner of the invention.
In preferred embodiments of the invention, the size of the phosphor particles can be selected by those of skill in this art without undue experimentation, but are typically in a size range of between about 0.001 microns and 20 microns per particle. If desired, the encapsulant can also include a scattering material, the nature and function of which is generally well understood in this art. A relevant explanation is set forth in commonly assigned US Patent Application Publication No. 20040012027 at Paragraphs 101 and 102.
The amount of the phosphor used in any given admixture can be selected by those of skill in this art as desired for a given diode and its desired output. Typically, the phosphor will be present in an amount of between about 1 and 50 percent by weight based on the weight of the resin, but higher or lower percentages can be used.
In order to take advantage the centrifuge method, the uncured mixture of resin and phosphor are typically placed into a cup. The term cup is used broadly herein to describe any container of an appropriate size for the chip, the resin, and the admixed phosphor. In many circumstances the cup will be the reflector portion of the resulting lamp as in the Figures herein. In the broadest sense, a cup is (or resembles) an open, bowl-shaped vessel, and cups for light emitting diodes can take such shapes. Reflectors of other shapes (e.g., rectangular cross-sections or other solid geometry), however, can still function as cups in the context of the present invention. Alternatively, a cup which does not serve as a reflector in the final lamp structure can be used temporarily during the centrifuging and curing steps, and then discarded, or can be part of a fixture used for phosphor deposition.
When the admixture of resin and phosphor are positioned in the cup along with the diode chip, they can be positioned in any appropriate centrifuge device provided it can be controlled in a manner that applies the desired amount of centrifugal force. In some cases, the empty cup can be placed in the centrifuge after which the chip can be added and after which the admixture can be added. In other circumstances, the chip can be placed in the cup and then the cup can be placed in the centrifuge and thereafter the admixture can be placed into the cup. In yet other circumstances, the chip and admixture can all be added to the cup before the cup is placed in the centrifuge. In each case, the speed of the centrifuge (typically expressed in revolutions per minute (rpm)) and the time of centrifuging can be used to control the phosphor placement based upon the size and density of the phosphor particles and the viscosity of the liquid resin.
Commercially available centrifuges are entirely appropriate for the process. For example, centrifuges that are useful for separating biological suspensions are quite suitable for purposes of the invention. Examples are well known to those of ordinary skill in the laboratory arts and include a number of those available from companies such as Beckman Coulter, with the ALLEGRA® X-12 benchtop centrifuge having been used successfully for this purpose (Beckman Coulter, Inc., 4300 N. Harbor Boulevard, P.O. Box 3100, Fullerton, Calif. 92834-3100, USA). This centrifuge has a maximum speed of 10,200 rpm with a fixed angle rotor and 3,750 rpm with a swinging bucket rotor of the type illustrated in
As a formal detail, those familiar with the laws of motion will recognize that “centrifugal force” is sometimes referred to as a “pseudo-force” because it actually represents the combination of the momentum of an object moving in a circular path against the centripetal force holding the rotating object in position with respect to a center of rotation. Similarly, when used as a noun, the term “centrifuge” defines a machine using centrifugal force for separating substances of different densities, for removing moisture, or for simulating gravitational effects. When used as a verb, “centrifuge” defines the act of applying a centrifugal force in order to separate solids from liquids, or different layers in a liquid or to otherwise simulate and increase gravitational effects.
The invention is not limited to a single step of phosphor positioning and curing. In another embodiment, the phosphor can be deposited on multiple surfaces. In this embodiment, the phosphor is first deposited on a first surface using the centrifuging step, then after the resin has cured, the device can be turned, and an additional or different admixture of resin and phosphor can be dispensed, centrifuged, and cured.
In the same manner, the centrifuging step of the invention can be used with other conventional manufacturing steps as desired. Thus, one portion of the resin-phosphor admixture can be positioned on a chip without benefit of centrifuging and allowed to cure while the centrifuging and curing steps are carried out separately either before or after the conventional step.
In yet another embodiment, and one that is particularly useful for extremely small phosphor particle sizes, the phosphor can be admixed with a more volatile liquid and less viscous such as an organic solvent (e.g., isopropyl alcohol or water). The centrifuging step can then be used to position the phosphor particles adjacent the chip in the organic solvent, after which the solvent can be allowed to evaporate leaving the phosphor in position on the chip. An encapsulant or lens can then be added.
The phosphor, which in actuality may not be visible as individual particles to the naked eye, is schematically illustrated in
The reflector 12 is fixed on a mounting substrate 15 which also includes electrical contacts 16 and 17.
An excess of resin, however, is undesirable because it would fill other portions of the reflector in an undesired and potentially wasteful manner.
The shape of the lens can be selected or designed as desired or necessary based upon the end use the diode and may be influenced by other factors other factors such as the package or the method used to make the lens.
Because the trays 43 pivot on the arms 41, 42, the trays can be loaded with diodes while the centrifuge is at rest with the trays 43 in a horizontal position. As the centrifuge rotates and the speed of rotation increases, the trays 43 can pivot on the pins 44 so that at higher speeds, the trays are oriented partially or fully vertically with respect to the arms 41 rather than in the horizontal position to which they return when the centrifuge slows or stops.
It will be understood that the design of the arms, the pins 44, and the trays 43 are based upon the particular diode being centrifuged and are entirely within the skill of those persons familiar with this art.
Those of skill in this art will recognize, however, that in addition to the weight percentage of phosphor, the particular color coordinate produced can vary based on the type of phosphor, the particular package, the specific output of the chip, the encapsulant, and other related factors.
Using the information gleaned from the experiment represented by
In the drawings and specification there has been set forth a preferred embodiment of the invention, and although specific terms have been employed, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation, the scope of the invention being defined in the claims.
This application is a divisional of, and claims the benefit of, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/956,989 filed on Dec. 14, 2007 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,167,674
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3780357 | Haitz | Dec 1973 | A |
4576796 | McCormick | Mar 1986 | A |
4733335 | Serizawa et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4918497 | Edmond | Apr 1990 | A |
4935665 | Murata | Jun 1990 | A |
4946547 | Palmour et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4966862 | Edmond | Oct 1990 | A |
5027168 | Edmond | Jun 1991 | A |
5200022 | Kong et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5210051 | Carter, Jr. | May 1993 | A |
5277840 | Osaka et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5338944 | Edmond et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
RE34861 | Davis et al. | Feb 1995 | E |
5393993 | Edmond et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5416342 | Edmond et al. | May 1995 | A |
5523589 | Edmond et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5604135 | Edmond et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5614131 | Mukerji et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5631190 | Negley | May 1997 | A |
5739554 | Edmond et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5766987 | Mitchell et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5813753 | Vriens et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5849354 | Tsuchiyama | Dec 1998 | A |
5858278 | Itoh et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5912477 | Negley | Jun 1999 | A |
5923053 | Jakowetz et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5959316 | Lowery | Sep 1999 | A |
5998925 | Shimizu | Dec 1999 | A |
6001671 | Fjelstad | Dec 1999 | A |
6056421 | Johnson et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066861 | Horn et al. | May 2000 | A |
6069440 | Shimizu et al. | May 2000 | A |
6087202 | Exposito et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6120600 | Edmond et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6132072 | Turnbull et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6139304 | Centofante | Oct 2000 | A |
6153448 | Takahashi | Nov 2000 | A |
6157086 | Weber | Dec 2000 | A |
6187606 | Edmond et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6201262 | Edmond et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6252254 | Soules et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6257737 | Marshall et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6274890 | Oshio et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6329224 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331063 | Kamada et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6333522 | Inoue et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6338813 | Hsu et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6366018 | Garbuzov et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6376277 | Corisis | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6404125 | Garbuzov et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6468832 | Mostafazadeh | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6501100 | Srivastava | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6504180 | Heremans et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6522065 | Srivastava | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6531328 | Chen | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6580097 | Soules et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6583444 | Fjelstad | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6624058 | Kazama | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6642652 | Collins, III | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6649946 | Bogner et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6650044 | Lowery | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6653765 | Levinson et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6664560 | Emerson et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6669866 | Kummer et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6686676 | McNulty | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6733711 | Durocher et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6734033 | Emerson et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6744196 | Jeon | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6759266 | Hoffman | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6791119 | Slater, Jr. et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6791259 | Stokes | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6793371 | Lamke et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6812500 | Reeh et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6853010 | Slater, Jr. et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6860621 | Bachl et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6919683 | Jang | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6921929 | LeBoeuf et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6924233 | Chua et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6936862 | Chang et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6939481 | Srivastava | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6958497 | Emerson et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6967116 | Negley | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7023019 | Madea et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7029935 | Negley et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7042020 | Negley | May 2006 | B2 |
7049159 | Lowery | May 2006 | B2 |
7078737 | Yuri | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7183586 | Ichihara | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7183587 | Negley et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7202598 | Juestel et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7217583 | Negley et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7246923 | Conner | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7259402 | Edmond et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7286296 | Chaves et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7452568 | Hougham et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7566639 | Kohda | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7601550 | Bogner | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7714342 | Lee et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
8610145 | Yano | Dec 2013 | B2 |
20010000622 | Reeh et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20010007484 | Sakamaki | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010015442 | Kondoh et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010019177 | Sugihara | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010038166 | Weber | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020001869 | Fjelstad | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020006040 | Kamada et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020048905 | Ikegami et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020056847 | Uemura | May 2002 | A1 |
20020057057 | Sorg | May 2002 | A1 |
20020063520 | Yu et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020070449 | Yagi et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020079837 | Okazaki | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020088985 | Komoto et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020096789 | Bolken | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020105266 | Juestel et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020123164 | Slater, Jr. et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020158578 | Eliashevich et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020185965 | Collins, III et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030006418 | Emerson et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030038596 | Ho | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030066311 | Li et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030079989 | Klocke et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030121511 | Hashimura et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030181122 | Collins et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030207500 | Pichler et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040004435 | Hsu | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040012958 | Hashimoto et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040037949 | Wright | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040038442 | Kinsman | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040041159 | Yuri et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040041222 | Loh | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040056260 | Slater et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040061115 | Kozawa et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040061433 | Izuno et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040106234 | Sorg et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040124429 | Stokes | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040140765 | Takekuma et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040164307 | Mueller-Mach et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040164311 | Uemura | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040170018 | Nawashiro | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040173806 | Chua | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040180475 | Shibata et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040188697 | Brunner et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040245530 | Kameyama | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040256974 | Mueller-Mach et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040263073 | Baroky et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050001225 | Yoshimura et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050002168 | Narhi et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050006651 | LeBoeuf et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050051782 | Negley et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050062140 | Leung et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050072981 | Suenaga | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050080193 | Woulters et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050122031 | Itai | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050145991 | Sakamoto et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050167682 | Fukasawa | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050184305 | Ueda | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050184638 | Mueller et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050194606 | Oohata | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050196886 | Jager et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050211991 | Mori et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050219835 | Nagayama | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050221519 | Leung et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050243237 | Sasuga | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050259423 | Heuser et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050265404 | Ashdown | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050269592 | Lee et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050280894 | Hartkop et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060001046 | Batres et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060003477 | Braune et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060027820 | Cao | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060060867 | Suehiro | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060060872 | Edmond et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060060874 | Edmond et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060060879 | Edmond et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060065906 | Harada | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060068154 | Parce et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060091788 | Yan | May 2006 | A1 |
20060102991 | Sakano | May 2006 | A1 |
20060124947 | Mueller et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060138937 | Ibbetson | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060145170 | Cho | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060157721 | Tran et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060189098 | Edmond | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060202105 | Krames et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060267042 | Izuno | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060284195 | Nagai | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070012940 | Suh et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070024173 | Braune | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070034995 | Kameyama | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070037307 | Donofrio | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070092636 | Thompson et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070096131 | Chandra | May 2007 | A1 |
20070114559 | Sayers et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070138941 | Jin et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070158668 | Tarsa et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070158669 | Lee et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070165403 | Park | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070215890 | Harbers et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070259206 | Oshio | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070278502 | Shakuda et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080006815 | Wang et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080149945 | Nagai | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080173884 | Chitnis et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080203410 | Brunner et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080283865 | Yoo | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080303410 | Kaneda et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090086492 | Meyer | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090101930 | Li | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090154195 | Ishii et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090268461 | Deak et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090322197 | Helbing | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20120043886 | Ji et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2310925 | Mar 1999 | CN |
2310925 | Mar 1999 | CN |
1372330 | Oct 2002 | CN |
1455960 | Nov 2003 | CN |
1476050 | Feb 2004 | CN |
1547265 | Nov 2004 | CN |
1866561 | Nov 2006 | CN |
19638667 | Apr 1998 | DE |
19945672 | Apr 2000 | DE |
69702929 | Feb 2001 | DE |
102005000800 | Aug 2005 | DE |
102005013265 | Dec 2005 | DE |
102005042814 | Apr 2006 | DE |
102005062514 | Mar 2007 | DE |
102005058127 | Jun 2007 | DE |
102007022090 | Nov 2008 | DE |
0732740 | Sep 1996 | EP |
1017112 | Jul 2000 | EP |
1059678 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1 138 747 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1138747 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1198016 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1198005 | Apr 2002 | EP |
1198016 | Apr 2002 | EP |
1367655 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1601030 | Nov 2005 | EP |
1724848 | Nov 2006 | EP |
1804304 | Jul 2007 | EP |
1935452 | Jun 2008 | EP |
2704690 | Nov 1994 | FR |
61048951 | Mar 1986 | JP |
59027559 | Feb 1987 | JP |
02-086150 | Mar 1990 | JP |
402086150 | Mar 1990 | JP |
4233454 | Aug 1992 | JP |
H10107325 | Apr 1998 | JP |
10-163525 | Jun 1998 | JP |
10163525 | Jun 1998 | JP |
10163525 | Jun 1998 | JP |
10247750 | Sep 1998 | JP |
10261821 | Sep 1998 | JP |
H0261821 | Sep 1998 | JP |
11276932 | Oct 1999 | JP |
20000002168 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2002101147 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2000-164937 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2000164930 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2000164937 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2000208820 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2000208820 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2000243728 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2000277551 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2000349346 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2001308116 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2001345480 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2002009097 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002-050799 | Feb 2002 | JP |
200250799 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2002050799 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2002-093830 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002076445 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002-118293 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002118293 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002118293 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002280607 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2002319704 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2002374006 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2003-007929 | Jan 2003 | JP |
20037929 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003007929 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003046141 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003-115614 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003110153 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003115614 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003-170465 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2003-197655 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003224307 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2003234511 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2003-258011 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2003318448 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2004-031856 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004031856 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2004095765 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2004134699 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2004186488 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004266240 | Sep 2004 | JP |
3589187 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2004-363342 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2004363342 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2005019838 | Jan 2005 | JP |
2005033138 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2005064113 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2005167079 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005-252222 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2005252222 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2005298817 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2006032387 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006054209 | Feb 2006 | JP |
20060495533 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006080565 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2006114637 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2006165416 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2006245020 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2006-253370 | Sep 2006 | JP |
2006253370 | Sep 2006 | JP |
2006313886 | Nov 2006 | JP |
2007063538 | Mar 2007 | JP |
2008-129043 | Jun 2008 | JP |
2008532281 | Aug 2008 | JP |
2008-218511 | Sep 2008 | JP |
2000-299334 | Oct 2010 | JP |
200412776 | Feb 2004 | KR |
2004-0017926 | Mar 2004 | KR |
200417926 | Mar 2004 | KR |
200429313 | Apr 2004 | KR |
522423 | Mar 2003 | TW |
581325 | Mar 2004 | TW |
595012 | Jun 2004 | TW |
WO0033390 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO0124283 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO03001612 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 03021668 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO200402074 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO2005101445 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO2005101909 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO2005121641 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO2006033695 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO2006036251 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO 2006065015 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO2006135496 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO2007107903 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO2007136956 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO2008003176 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO2009060356 | May 2009 | WO |
WO2010035171 | Apr 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Interrogation from Japanese Patent Appl. No. 2008-317576, dated Jul. 9, 2013. |
Decision of Final Rejection from Japanese Patent Appl. No. 2011-224055, dated Jul. 26, 2013. |
Decision of Rejection from Japanese Patent appl. No. 2011-279356, dated Jul. 31, 2013. |
Notice of Rejection from Japanese Patent Appl. No. 2008-527912, dated Jun. 5, 2013. |
Notice of Rejection from Japanese Patent Appl. No. 2008-527912 issued Jun. 14, 2011. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability from Appl. No. PCT/US06/24884 dated: Jun. 12, 2008. |
Nichia Corp. White LED. Part No. NSPW312BX, “Specification for Nichia White LED, Model NSW312BS”, pp. 1-14, 2004. |
Nichia Corp. White LED, Part No. NSPW300BS, Specifications for Nichia White LED, Model NSPW300BS, pp. 1-14, 2004. |
Office Action from Japanese Patent Appl. No. 2007-216808, mailed Sep. 6, 2010. |
Office Action from Japanese Patent Appl. No. 2011-224055, Jan. 12, 2012. |
Decision of Final Rejection from Japanese Patent Appl. No. 2007-216808, dated Jan. 1, 2011. |
Office Action from German Patent Appl. No. 10 2007 040 841.4-33, dated Sep. 17, 2009. |
Office Action from German Patent Appl. No. 10 2007 040 811.2, dated Sep. 17, 2009. |
Office Action from Chinese Patent Appl. No. 20070148326.9, dated Jun. 19, 2009. 2 pages. |
Schubert, “Light-Emitting Diodes”, Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 92-96. |
Office Action from Korean Patent Appl. No. 10-2009-7017405, dated Oct. 23, 2013. |
Appeal Decision to Grant a Patent from Japanese Patent No. 2007-506279, dated Oct. 28, 2013. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/072,371, dated Nov. 8, 2013. |
First Office Action and Search Report from Chinese Patent Application No. 201210030627.2. dated Dec. 3, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance from Korean Patent Appl. No. 10-2009-7017405, dated: Feb. 18, 2014. |
Search Report from Taiwanese Patent appl. No. 096143968, dated: Feb. 17, 2014. |
Notification of Reasons for Rejection for Japanese Patent Appl. No. 2011-279356, dated Jan. 23, 2013. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from Application No. PCT/US2011/001214, dated Mar. 21, 2012. |
Notification of the First Office Action, Chinese Patent Application No. 201010279016.2, dated: Feb. 28, 2012. |
Patent Abstracts of Japan, 2003-258011, Sep. 12, 2003. |
Patent Abstracts of Japan, 2002-093830, Mar. 29, 2002. |
JP 2005 033138 A, Feb. 2005 Iwao. |
Patent Abstracts of Japan 2004-221185, Aug. 5, 2004. |
Patent Abstracts of Japan 11-040858, Feb. 12, 1999. |
Patent Abstracts of Japan 2001-181613, Jul. 3, 2001. |
NPO-30394 Electrophoretic Deposition for Fabricating Microbatteries p. 1-2, NASA Tech Briefs Issue May 3, 2003. |
Nichia Corp. White LED Part No. NSPW300BS, Specification for Nichia White LED, Model NSPW300BS Jan. 14, 2004. |
Nichia Corp. White LED Part No. NSPW312BS, Specification for Nichia White LED, Model NSPW312BS Jan. 14, 2004. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/077,638, dated Sep. 22, 2010. |
Response to Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 11/398,214, OA dated Dec. 11, 2009, Resp. filed Mar. 2, 2010. |
Response to Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 10/666,399, OA dated May 11, 2010, Resp. filed Aug. 11, 2010. |
Response to Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 12/008,477, OA dated Mar. 1, 2010. Resp. filed May 26, 2010. |
Response to Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 11/982,276, OA dated Mar. 25, 2010, Resp. filed Jun. 21, 2010. |
Response to Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 11/881,683, OA dated May 12, 2010, Resp. filed Aug. 3, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/506,989, dated Mar. 8, 2011. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/008,477, dated Mar. 1, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/656,759, dated Nov. 25, 2009. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/881,683, dated Feb. 5, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/982,276, dated Mar. 25, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/827,626, dated Apr. 1, 2011. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 10/666,399, dated Oct. 14, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/398,214, dated Dec. 11, 2009. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/506,989, dated Jul. 23, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/666,399, dated Dec. 22, 2009. |
Response to Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 12/077,638, OA dated Jul. 7, 2010, Resp. filed Aug. 30, 2010. |
Response to Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 11/656,759, OA dated Nov. 25, 2009, Resp. filed Apr. 26, 2010. |
Response to Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 11/899,790, OA dated Jun. 2, 2010, Resp. filed Nov. 1, 2010. |
Response to Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 10/666,399, OA dated Dec. 22, 2009, Resp. filed Mar. 22, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/881,683, dated Oct. 14, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/899,790, dated Mar. 21, 2011. |
Examiner-Initiated Interview Summary from U.S. Appl. No. 11/956,989, dated Dec. 16, 2011. |
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 11/956,989, dated Dec. 23, 2011. |
Response to Office Action dated Sep. 21, 2011, response dated Oct. 13, 2011. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/956,989, dated Sep. 21, 2011. |
Response to Office Action dated Apr. 16, 2010, response dated Jul. 14, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/956,989, dated Jun. 30, 2010. |
Response to Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/956,989, dated Apr. 16. 2010, response dated Jun. 14, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/956,989, dated Apr. 16, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/956,989, dated Oct. 13, 2009. |
Response to Office Action dated Oct. 13, 2009, response dated Jan. 13, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/982,276, dated Feb. 18, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/398,214, dated Nov. 12, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/656,759, dated May 21, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/656,759, dated Mar. 9, 2011. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/077,638, dated Dec. 21, 2010. |
Response to OA from U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,720, dated May 14, 2010, filed Jul. 6, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/982,276, dated Aug. 19, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/077,638, dated Jul. 7, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 10/666,399, dated May 11, 2010. |
Response to OA from U.S. Appl. No. 12/077,638, OA dated Dec. 8, 2009, filed Feb. 26, 2010. |
Response to OA from U.S. Appl. No. 11/982,276, OA dated Dec. 7, 2009, filed Feb. 5, 2010. |
Response to OA from U.S. Appl. No. 11/982,276, OA dated Aug. 19, 2010, filed Nov. 2, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/595,720, dated May 14, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/827,626, dated Oct. 7, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/008,477, dated Oct. 7, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/881,683, dated May 12, 2010. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/899,790, dated Jun. 2, 2010. |
Minutes of Oral Proceedings (EPO Form 2009) in European Patent Application No. 05808825.3 dated Feb. 3, 2011. |
Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings in European Patent Application No. 05808825.3 dated Feb. 3, 2011. |
Notice of Rejection (Final) in Japanese Patent Application No. 2006-526964 dated Feb. 22, 2011. |
Decision to Refuse a European Patent Application regarding EP 05 808 825.3 dated Jun. 14, 2011. |
International Preliminary Examination Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US07/24367 mailed Jun. 29, 2011. |
International Preliminary Examination Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US07/24366 mailed Jun. 29, 2011. |
Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 200780050127.2 dated Jun. 15, 2011. |
Office Action from Taiwan Patent Application No. 093128231 issued Apr. 21, 2011. |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection for counterpart Japanese Patent Application No. JP 2008-317576 dated Sep. 13, 2011. |
Notice of Rejection of Japanese Patent Application No. 2006-526964 issued Sep. 13, 2011. |
Notification of Reasons for Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2009-547219 dated Sep. 16, 2011. |
Office Action for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2007-7008694 mailed Aug. 7, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/824,385, filed Sep. 1, 2006, to Hussell, et al. |
Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 11/656,759, mailed Sep. 23, 2011. |
Response to Office Action No. U.S. Appl. No. 11/656,759, filed Jan. 16, 2012. |
Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 12/008,477, mailed Sep. 19, 2011. |
Response to Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 12/008,477, filed Jan. 25, 2012. |
Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 12/862,640, mailed Aug. 19, 2011. |
Response to Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 12/862,640, filed Feb. 21, 2012. |
Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 12/287,764, mailed Oct. 26, 2011. |
Response to Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 12/287,764, filed Mar. 6, 2012. |
Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 12/506,989, mailed Dec. 27, 2011. |
Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 11/899,790, mailed Jan. 12, 2012. |
Response to Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 11/899,790, filed Mar. 8, 2012. |
Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 12/862,640, mailed Mar. 9, 2012. |
Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 12/287,764, mailed Jan. 13, 2011. |
Response to Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 12/287,764, filed May 5, 2011. |
Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 12/008,477, mailed Apr. 12, 2011. |
Response to Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 12/008,477, filed Jun. 27, 2011. |
Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 11/899,790, mailed Jul. 27, 2011. |
Response to Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 11/899,790, filed Nov. 22. 2011. |
Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 12/506,989, mailed on Jul. 20, 2011. |
Response to Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 12/506,989, filed on Nov. 21, 2011. |
Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 12/287,764, mailed Jul. 30, 2010. |
Response to U.S. Appl. No. 12/287,764, filed Nov. 30, 2010. |
Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 12/287,764, mailed Mar. 25, 2010. |
Response to Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 12/287,764, filed Jul. 21, 2010. |
Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 12/287,764, mailed May 17, 2011. |
Response to Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 12/287,764, filed Oct. 10, 2011. |
Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 13/072,371, mailed Oct. 5, 2011. |
Response to Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 13/072,371, filed Dec. 23, 2011. |
Office Action (Brief Description of) from Chinese Patent Appl. No. 201010279016.2, dated Jan. 10, 2014. |
IPT's Decision from Korean Patent Appl No. 10-2007-7008694, dated Dec. 24, 2013. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/862,640, dated Dec. 20, 2013. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/656,759, dated Nov. 18, 2013. |
Examination Report for European Application No. 08 171 399.2-2222. Mar. 26, 2012. |
Examination Report for European Application No. 04 783 941.0-2203, dated Mar. 22, 2012. |
Notification of First Office Action from Chinese Application No. 201010279016.21, dated Feb. 28, 2012. |
Notification of the Third Office Action from Chinese Application No. 200780050127.2, dated Mar. 28, 2012. |
Decision of Rejection from Japanese Application No. 2009-547218, dated Mar. 8, 2012. |
Decision of Rejection from Japanese Application No. 2009-547219, dated Mar. 8. 2012. |
Extended European Search Report Application No. 10012027.8-2203/2306526, Mar. 30, 2012. |
Office Action for Taiwan Patent Application No. 094122646. Feb. 20, 2012. |
Rejection Decision from Chinese Patent Appl. No. 201010279016.2, dated Jun. 21, 2013. |
Examination Report from European Patent Appl. No. 04 783 941.0-1555, dated Jul. 25, 2013. |
Notice of Results of Re-Consideration Prior to Appeal from Korean Patent Application No. 10-2007-7008694, dated Sep. 21, 2012. |
Rejection Decision for Chinese Patent Application No. 201110029365.3, dated Sep. 10, 2012. |
Noting of Loss of Rights from European Application No. 04783941.0-2203/1665361, dated Nov. 6, 2012. |
Office Action from Japanese Office Action, Application No. 2011-224055, dated Feb. 7, 2013. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/072,371, dated Mar. 29, 2012. |
Response to OA from U.S. Appl. No. 13/072,371, filed May 16, 2012. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/656,759, dated May 1, 2012. |
Response to OA from U.S. Appl. No. 11/656,759, filed Jun. 26, 2012. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/862,640, dated Jun. 29, 2012. |
Response to OA from U.S. Appl. No. 12/862,640, filed Sep. 20, 2012. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/506,989, dated Jul. 6, 2012. |
Response to OA from U.S. Appl. No. 12/506,989, filed Oct. 11, 2012. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/072,371, dated Jul. 23, 2012. |
Response to OA from U.S. Appl. No. 13/072,371, filed Oct. 17, 2012. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/842,639, dated Aug. 14, 2012. |
Response to OA from Patent Appl. No. 12/842,639, filed Nov. 9, 2012. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/862,640, dated Oct. 2, 2012. |
Response to OA from U.S. Appl. No. 12/862,640, filed Apr. 17, 2013. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/506,989, dated Oct. 24, 2012. |
Response to OA from U.S. Appl. No. 12/506,989, filed Dec. 4, 2012. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/899,790, dated Dec. 5, 2012. |
Response to OA from U.S. Appl. No. 11/899,790, filed Feb. 27, 2013. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/506,989, dated Jan. 18, 2013. |
Response to OA from U.S. Appl. No. 12/506,989, filed Apr. 18, 2013. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/862,640, dated Jan. 24, 2013. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/072,371, dated Jan. 30, 2013. |
Response to OA from U.S. Appl. No. 13/072,371, filed Apr. 22, 2013. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/656,759, dated Feb. 13, 2013. |
Response to OA from U.S. Appl. No. 11/656,759, filed May 13, 2013. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/656,759, dated Jul. 2, 2013. |
Response to OA from U.S. Appl. No. 11/656,759, filed Aug. 21, 2013. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/899,790, dated May 1, 2013. |
Response to OA from U.S. Appl. No. 11/899,790, filed Jun. 18, 2013. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/072,371, dated Apr. 30, 2013. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/862,640, dated Apr. 30, 2013. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/842,639, dated Mar. 7, 2013. |
Response to OA from U.S. Appl. No. 12/842,639, filed Jun. 5, 2013. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/506,989, dated Sep. 5, 2013. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/899,790, dated Sep. 17, 2013. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/008,477, dated Sep. 3, 2013. |
Rejection Decision from Taiwanese Patent Appl. No 094122646, dated Dec. 14, 2012. |
Decision of Rejection from Japanese Patent Appl. No. 2008-317576, dated Dec. 18, 2012. |
Decision of Rejection from Japanese Patent Appl. No. 2006-526964, dated Dec. 18, 2012. |
Second Office Action from Chinese Patent Application No. 20101029016.2, dated Dec. 24, 2012. |
Official Action from European Patent Application No. 07874432.3, dated Nov. 13. 2012. |
Official Action from European Patent Application No. 07840092.6, dated Nov. 13, 2012. |
Decision of Rejection from Japanese Patent appl. No. 2012-02326, dated Apr. 8, 2014. |
First Office Action and Search Report from Chinese Patent Appl. No. 2012-10175686.9, dated: Mar. 31, 2014. |
Translation of Office Action from Taiwanese Patent Appl. No. 096143968, dated Feb. 13, 2014. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/899,790, dated Feb. 25, 2014. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/506,989, dated Feb. 19, 2014. |
Examination from European Appl. No. 04 783 941.0-1552, dated Mar. 6, 2014. |
Office Action and Search Report from Taiwanese Patent Appl. No. 101130701, dated Feb. 6, 2014. |
Search Report from Taiwanese Patent Appl. No. 097110195, dated Mar. 12, 2014. |
Notification of Reexamination from Chinese Patent Appl. No. 200780050127.2, dated Jun. 3, 2014 |
Notification of Allowance from Taiwan Patent Appl. No. 101130701. dated Jul. 15, 2014. |
Office Action and Search Report from Taiwan Patent Appl No. 097110195, dated Jul. 18, 2014. |
Decision of Rejection from Japanese Patent Appl. No. 2012-026327, dated Apr. 8, 2014. |
Brief Summary of Rejection Decision from Chinese Patent Appl. No. 201010279016.2 dated Apr. 22, 2014. |
Preliminary Report from Japanese Patent Appl. No. 2013-020955 dated Dec. 26, 2013 (received May 8, 2014). |
Preliminary Report from Japanese Patent Appl. No 2013-024242 dated Feb. 26, 2014 (received May 8, 2014). |
Office Action from Korean Patent Appl. No. 10-2009-7017407, dated Apr. 28, 2014. |
Notification of Reexamination from Chinese Patent appl No. 201110029365.3 dated May 7, 2014. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/008,477, dated Apr. 25, 2014. |
Response to OA from U.S. Appl. No. 12/008,477, filed May 27, 2014. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/072,371, dated Apr. 29, 2014. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/656,759, dated May 27, 2014. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/899,790, dated Jun. 25, 2014. |
Board Decision from Chinese Patent Appl. No. 201110029365.3, dated Aug. 13, 2014. |
Second Office Action from Chinese Patent Appl. No. 201210175686.9, dated Sep. 3, 2014. |
Office Action from Taiwanese Patent Appl. No. 097110195, dated Sep. 5, 2014. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/842,639, dated Aug. 6, 2014. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/506,989, dated Aug. 8, 2014. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/017,845, dated Sep. 11, 2014. |
Fourth Examination from European Patent Appl. No. 04 783 941.0-1552, dated Oct. 7, 2014. |
Summons to attend oral proceedings from European Patent Appl. No. 411.52.106724/0, dated Sep. 9, 2014. |
Reexamination Decision from Chinese Patent Appl. No. 200780050127.2, dated Jan. 5, 2015. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/209,652, dated Dec. 12, 2014. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/506,989, dated Jan. 21, 2015. |
Summons to attend Oral Proceedings from European Appl. No. 08171399.2, dated Jan. 16, 2015. |
Letter regarding unfavorable decision on appeal from Japanese Appl. No. 2011-279356, dated Nov. 12, 2014. |
Third Office Action from Chinese Appl. No. 201210175686.9, dated Dec. 11, 2014. |
Notification of re-examination from Chinese Appl. No. 201010279016.2, dated Jan. 9, 2015. |
Decision of Re-Examination from Chinese Appl. No. 201080001658.4, dated Dec. 29, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120206039 A1 | Aug 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11956989 | Dec 2007 | US |
Child | 13429053 | US |