This invention relates to a photo acoustic detector for detecting a concentration of a sample in a sample mixture, the photo acoustic detector comprising a light source, a light modulator, an acoustic cell with an acoustic resonator, a resonant pickup element and a processing section. The light source produces a light beam for exciting molecules of the sample. The light modulator modulates an intensity of the light beam for generating pressure variations in the sample mixture, an amplitude of the pressure variations being a measure of the concentration of the sample. The acoustic resonator amplifies the pressure variations. The pickup element converts the pressure variations into a detector signal. The processing section processes the detector signal to generate a sample signal caused by the pressure variations. This invention further relates to a method for manufacturing such a photo acoustic detector.
Such photo acoustic detectors are used for trace gas monitoring in industry and may in the future also be used for breath testing (asthma, alcohol, stomach disorders) or air pollution measurements. A disadvantage of amplitude modulated photo acoustic detection is that the background signal, generated by the modulated laser, is at the same frequency as the sample signal of interest. This is in contrast to wavelength modulation, where the laser is modulated at frequency f, and the signal is detected at frequency 2f. Wavelength modulation is however not possible for, e.g., NO2 detection with a blue diode laser because the NO2 absorption spectrum at 400 nm is much broader than the laser-diode's wavelength tuning range. If, for optimal detection, a tuning fork pickup element is situated in the light path, then part of the amplitude modulated light can lead to a direct excitation of the tuning fork and thereby the generation of a background signal that can be orders of magnitude larger than the signal corresponding to the detection limit. Because the background signal and the NO2 signal have the same frequency, the background signal cannot be filtered out using a high-pass filter. The use of background subtraction without sacrificing the detection limit requires a very stable and known background and/or a background that is small relative to the NO2 signal.
It is an object of the invention to provide an amplitude modulated photo acoustic detector with improved background compensation.
According to a first aspect of the invention, this object is achieved by providing a photo acoustic detector according to the opening paragraph, wherein the processing section is arranged for processing the detector signal to generate a sample signal caused by the pressure variations, and a background signal caused by direct excitation of the pickup element by the light beam, and wherein the acoustic cell and the pickup element are arranged such that a phase difference between the background signal and the sample signal is close to 90 degrees.
The resonant pickup element, which gives extra signal enhancement, leads in combination with the acoustic resonator to a phase shift of the pressure wave signal relative to the background signal generated by absorption of light in the pickup element. This mechanism is in contrast to the background signal that can be generated in the wall of the acoustic resonator and consequently has a phase that is close to the phase of the photo acoustic signal. By, for instance, an appropriate combination of light beam diameter and acoustic resonator diameter, the wall background signal can be made small compared to the pickup elements background signal. If necessary, the signal enhancement obtained by the use of a resonant pickup element can be compromised a bit for this purpose.
In contrast to the amplitude stability necessary for background correction by subtraction, a method based on the 90° phase difference between signal and background only needs phase stability. As the background signal depends as cos θ on the relative angle, only large variations in background phase will result in a significant background signal. Once a close to 90° phase difference between the sample signal and background signal is obtained the background signal can be suppressed using phase-sensitive detection and variations in background signal will no longer influence the accuracy of the sample concentration detection. As will be elucidated below, there are several alternative ways for adjusting the phase difference between the sample signal and the background signal.
The background phase variation is mainly determined by the resonance curve of the pickup element while the photo acoustic phase (PA phase) is determined by both the pickup element and acoustic resonance. As a result, close to the resonance, there is a constant phase difference between background and NO2 signal. In the manufacturing process, by tuning the acoustic resonance frequency to match the pickup element resonance frequency, a 90 degree phase difference between background and sample signal can be achieved, thus reducing the effect of the background. Alternatively, the cell can be adjusted to the pickup element resonance frequency by the user after manufacturing.
According to one embodiment of the invention a resonance frequency of the pickup element is essentially equal to a resonance frequency of the acoustic resonator. When those two resonance frequencies are equal, the phase difference is 90 degrees. The resonance frequencies depend on the shapes of the acoustic resonator and of the pickup element. The resonance frequency of the pickup element can, e.g., be established by carefully selecting or producing a tuning fork of the correct length during the manufacturing process.
Preferably, the photo acoustic detector further comprises phase adjusting means for adjusting the phase difference. For example, an optical power distribution of the light beam over a surface of the pickup element is adjustable.
The inventors observed that the phase of the background signal for a tuning fork depends very sensitively on the optical power distribution over the metal electrodes. After optimizing for maximum optical power transmission through the prongs of the tuning fork, the amount of optical power has a certain distribution over the electrodes. Together with the electrode sensitivity this leads to a background signal at a certain phase angle. By adjusting the alignment of the laser beam, the phase of the background signal can be adjusted such that the background signal at the sample signal phase is zero. The background phase is then at 90 degrees relative to the sample signal. This could be achieved with only a very small loss in optical transmission (˜1%), thus not affecting the sample signal strength.
Alternatively, the resonance frequency of the acoustic resonator is adjustable, e.g., by changing a length of a buffer volume in the acoustic cell. This enables the manufacturer or user to make the phase difference close to 90 degrees and to adjust the phase difference when, e.g., the manufacturing process results in variations in the resonance properties of the acoustic resonators and pickup elements.
According to another aspect of the invention, a method for manufacturing a photo acoustic detector is provided, comprising a step of filling the acoustic cell with a sample mixture, not comprising the sample, a step of modulating the intensity of the light beam for generating pressure variations in the sample mixture, a step of acquiring the detector signal from the resonant pickup element, and a step of arranging the acoustic cell and the pickup element such that the sample signal is minimized and the background signal is maximized in order to obtain a close to 90 degrees phase difference between the background signal and the sample signal.
When the sample mixture has a zero or close to zero concentration of the sample, the sample signal should be (close to) zero and the background signal should account for (most of) the detector signal. As described above, the arranging of the acoustic cell and the pickup element may be performed in different ways. For example, careful selection of a tuning fork of the correct length such that the acoustic resonance frequency matches the pickup element resonance frequency may result in a close to 90 degrees phase difference. Alternatively, the optical power distribution of the light beam over the surface of the pickup element may be adjusted or the acoustic cell may be provided with a suitable buffer volume. These and other aspects of the invention are apparent from and will be elucidated with reference to the embodiments described hereinafter.
In the drawings:
It is an advantage of the tuning fork 10, that it is much more sensitive and accurate in detecting the pressure waves. A disadvantage of the use of a tuning fork 10 instead of a microphone is that direct excitation of the tuning fork 10 by the laser beam 11 leads to the generation of a background signal at the same frequency as the sample signal. According to the invention the electric signal 13 from the tuning fork 10 is used to generate a sample signal representing the pressure variations and a background signal representing the direct excitation of the tuning fork 10 by the laser beam 11. To enable the processing section to generate these two signals, the photo acoustic detector is arranged such that the phase difference between the background signal and the sample signal is close to 90 degrees. This may, e.g., be achieved by using an acoustic resonator 12 and a tuning fork 10 with such a shape and dimension that their respective resonance frequencies are essentially equal. For example, in the manufacturing process of the detector, the length of the prongs of the tuning fork 10 is adjusted to obtain a tuning fork 10 with a resonance frequency that is very close to the resonance frequency of the acoustic resonator 12.
Preferably, the photo acoustic detector comprises means for adjusting the phase difference directly after the manufacturing process. Alternatively, the adjustments are made later, when the detector is in use. One example of such an adjustable detector is shown in
In the embodiment shown in
First, close to resonance, the phase of the background signal depends strongly on modulation frequency. In case of a measurement of only the background signal the modulation frequency of the laser can be tuned to the resonance frequency such that the background signal remains at a constant phase (and thus at 90 degrees relative to the sample signal). Alternatively, the optimal modulation frequency can be determined from a maximization of the (out-of phase) background signal.
Second, a stable electronic control loop can be implemented as shown in
It should be noted that the above-mentioned embodiments illustrate rather than limit the invention, and that those skilled in the art will be able to design many alternative embodiments without departing from the scope of the appended claims. In the claims, any reference signs placed between parentheses shall not be construed as limiting the claim. Use of the verb “comprise” and its conjugations does not exclude the presence of elements or steps other than those stated in a claim. The article “a” or “an” preceding an element does not exclude the presence of a plurality of such elements. The invention may be implemented by means of hardware comprising several distinct elements, and by means of a suitably programmed computer. In the device claim enumerating several means, several of these means may be embodied by one and the same item of hardware. The mere fact that certain measures are recited in mutually different dependent claims does not indicate that a combination of these measures cannot be used to advantage.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
08152494.4 | Mar 2008 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB09/50830 | 3/2/2009 | WO | 00 | 8/30/2010 |