Photo-acoustic gas sensors operate by heating a gas using a laser tuned to a gas absorption line corresponding to a gas to be detected, such as hydrogen sulfide. If the gas is present even at part per million levels optical absorption occurs, which causes local heating and results in thermal expansion (pressure waves). The pressure waves are an acoustic signature that may be detected by a microphone or other acoustic pressure responsive sensor.
An alternative mechanism for measuring the presence of a specific gas includes a direct extinction method that measures light intensity before and after a gas absorption cell. Conclusions can be drawn regarding the concentration of the light-absorbing gas from the difference of the two measurements. This method permits analysis in flowing gas. However, it is only suitable for determination of relatively high gas concentrations, unless very considerable cell lengths or multiple reflection cells can be accepted. However, in the latter case it is necessary for the incident light beam to be narrowly focused and the mirror system must be very accurately adjusted. Multiple reflection cells used in such a mirror system are generally very complicated and costly. Environmental factors can adversely affect the performance of such mirror systems.
A photoacoustic sensing device includes a laser tuned to emit light to cause optical absorption by a gas to be detected, a resonant acoustic sensor positioned to receive pressure waves from the gas, wherein the laser is modulated to match a resonant frequency of the resonant acoustic sensor, and a first mirror positioned to receive light from the laser after the light has passed through the gas and to reflect the received light back through the gas to cause additional optical absorption.
A method includes projecting a laser beam toward gas, wherein the laser beam is tuned to at least one gas absorption line of a gas to be detected, detecting pressure waves generated by optical absorption of the laser beam by the gas to be detected, and reflecting the laser beam back through the gas to increase an amplitude of the generated pressure waves.
In the following description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration specific embodiments which may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, and it is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that structural, logical and electrical changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention. The following description of example embodiments is, therefore, not to be taken in a limited sense, and the scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims.
A photoacoustic sensing device is illustrated generally at 100 in schematic form in
In one embodiment, the tuning fork 125 is a microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) resonant quartz tuning fork (QTF). The laser light is modulated at the QTF resonant frequency. The laser light 115 and gas 120 are positioned proximate the tuning fork 125 tines to optimize receipt of pressure waves from the optically heated gas. In one embodiment, the tuning fork is positioned within the gas, and the light is projected between the tines of the tuning fork. In further embodiments, the gas and light may be adjacent the tuning fork, yet sufficiently proximate the tuning fork such that pressure waves created by absorption of radiation by a gas of interest are received by the tuning fork to cause motion of the tuning fork. When the laser passes in front of the tuning fork, such an arrangement may be referred to as off axis.
A first mirror 130 is positioned to receive light 115 from the laser 110 after the light has passed through the gas 125 and to reflect the received light as indicated at 135 back through the gas 125 to cause additional optical absorption. The reflected light effectively increases the overall laser power available to heat the localized gas and increase the pressure waves created without adding additional noise. The first mirror 130 may be positioned to reflect the light back at an angle from the first light to ensure the light is not reflected back at the laser 110. By reflecting the light back through the gas, the signal to noise ratio is enhanced. The enhanced signal to noise ratio allows the use of lower power lasers such as low cost VCSELs, driving the cost of manufacture of a sensor lower. The mirrors need not be precisely aligned, since it is only desired that the light pass through the gas a desired number of times. The light also does not need to be in resonance with the mirror cavity mode, such as in a ring down cavity.
In one embodiment, the tuning fork is supported by a circuit board 150 that may contain circuitry to convert a small current generated by movement of the tuning fork into a voltage, such as by use of a transimpedance amplifier. The voltage may be converted to a digital signal by an analog to digital converter for processing and providing an output 155 representative of the concentration of the gas of interest in gas 120. The substrate 130 may also be used to support the mirror 130. In further embodiments, a separate substrate may be used to support the laser, sensor, mirror, and circuitry is proper relation to each other.
The mirror may formed by using silicon wafers with a reflective coating. In one embodiment, a mirror which possess 99% reflectance in the wavelength band of the desired gas absorption line may be used. This would enable significant signal enhancement over the use of a single beam of light. Many toxic gas species such as hydrogen sulfide have reduced absorption cross section. The increased signal to noise ratio facilitates ever lower concentrations to be detected.
In one embodiment, the second mirror 210 is positioned between the laser 110 and the first mirror 130 and contains an opening 220 to allow laser light to pass through the second mirror 210 to reach the first mirror 130. The reflections are angled slightly from orthogonal to gradually traverse a length of the mirrors before ending.
In one embodiment, the laser is positioned to project light onto the first mirror at an angle from orthogonal to facilitate reflection back toward the second mirror at a suitable physical displacement from the opening. The first and second mirrors are substantially parallel to each other to reflect the laser light multiple times over a length of the mirrors. In one embodiment, each reflection of the light by a mirror results in approximately 99% of the light being reflected. After fifty or so reflections, the power level remaining in the beam is fairly low, and further reflections would provide little additional benefit. The absorption cross section of the gas of interest is generally much smaller than the attenuation caused by the reflections, and may essentially be ignored for determining a desired number of reflections.
In one embodiment, the tuning fork is positioned between the two mirrors to receive the pressure waves and not receive the laser light. The laser light and gas may be positioned proximate the tuning fork to optimize receipt of pressure waves from the optically heated gas. The two mirrors may create a cavity to facilitate travel of the pressure waves to the tuning fork in some embodiments. It should be noted that given the speed of the beam compared to the rate of expansion of the gas caused by the beam, the multiple reflections occur quickly enough to not adversely affect the generation of the pressure waves by attenuation of the beam to correspond to the resonant frequency of the tuning fork.
The tuning fork may be a microelectricalmechanical systems (MEMS) tuning fork in some embodiments. One example tuning fork includes an R38 Raltron tuning fork. Other tuning forks or different types of acoustic pressure sensors may be used in further embodiments.
The mirrors, as above, may be formed by using silicon wafers with a reflective coating. In one embodiment, a mirror which possesses 99% reflectance in the wavelength band of the desired gas absorption line may be used. This would enable about a 40 times signal enhancement over the use of a single beam of light. The wafers may be bonded together with streets of photoresistive spacers. The cavity being formed in one embodiment is not a resonant cavity. As the cavity is a reflective non-resonant cavity, spacing of the mirrors need not be precise. The mirror positioning is thus robust against temperature and vibration environmental factors since the overall mirror spacing is not critical to maintain. In one embodiment, the mirrors may be positioned substantially parallel to each other to ensure a desired number of reflections of the beam.
The opening 220 in the second mirror may be a 100 micron entrance hole formed such as by etching or drilling to enable the light to enter the cavity. Other size openings may be used in further embodiments, and the size may depend on the beam width of the laser, which can vary for different size and cost laser sources.
In further embodiments, an acoustic sensing device, such as device 100 or 200 may be used to sample ambient environmental conditions, and need not utilize pipes or pumps to provide the gas to be measured. While a small pump might be used to pull in surrounding gas, the gas may instead be allowed to diffuse proximate the sensing device without the use of a pump or gas line.
An example method is illustrated at 400 in
In one embodiment, the laser is modulated at a resonant frequency of a pressure wave detector. The pressure waves are detected by a tuning fork. The electrical signal may be processed to indicate whether or not the gas to be detected is present.
1. A photoacoustic sensing device comprising:
2. The device of example 1 and further comprising a second mirror positioned relative to the first mirror to cause multiple further reflections of light through the gas between the first and second mirrors.
3. The device of example 2 wherein the first and second mirror are positioned outside a range that would create a resonant cavity for the laser light.
4. The device of example 2 or 3 wherein the second mirror is positioned between the laser and the first mirror and contains an opening to allow laser light to pass through the second mirror to reach the first mirror.
5. The device of example 2, 3, or 4 wherein the laser is positioned to project light onto the first mirror at an angle from orthogonal to facilitate reflection back toward the second mirror at a suitable physical displacement from the opening.
6. The device of example 2, 3, 4, or 5 wherein the first and second mirrors are substantially parallel to each other to reflect the laser light multiple times over a length of the mirrors.
7. The device of example 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 wherein the resonant sensor comprises a tuning fork that is positioned between the two mirrors to receive the pressure waves and not receive the laser light.
8. The device of example 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, or 7 wherein the resonant sensor is a microelectricalmechanical systems (MEMS) tuning fork.
9. The device of any one of examples 1-8 wherein the laser light and gas are positioned proximate the tuning fork to optimize receipt of pressure waves from the optically heated gas.
10. A method comprising:
11. The method of example 10 and further comprising modulating the laser at a resonant frequency of a pressure wave detector.
12. The method of example 10 or 11 wherein the pressure waves are detected by a tuning fork.
13. The method of example 10, 11, or 12 and further comprising converting the pressure waves to an electrical signal.
14. The method of example 13 and further comprising processing the electrical signal to indicate whether or not the gas to be detected is present.
15. A method comprising:
16. The method of example 15 and further comprising positioning a second mirror to reflect the laser beam reflected by the first mirror back through the gas to be detected.
17. The method of example 16 and further comprising positioning the second mirror such that the laser beam is reflected back and forth between the first and second mirror through the gas to be detected several times.
18. The method of example 17 wherein the number of reflections is at least fifty.
19. The method of example 15, 16, 17, or 18 wherein the pressure detector comprises a piezoelectric tuning fork.
20. The method of example 19 wherein the first and second mirrors form a cavity that directs pressure waves from the gas to the piezoelectric tuning fork.
Although a few embodiments have been described in detail above, other modifications are possible. For example, the logic flows depicted in the figures do not require the particular order shown, or sequential order, to achieve desirable results. Other steps may be provided, or steps may be eliminated, from the described flows, and other components may be added to, or removed from, the described systems. Other embodiments may be within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3820901 | Kreuzer | Jun 1974 | A |
3995960 | Fletcher et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4253770 | Horiba | Mar 1981 | A |
4273450 | Watanabe et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4399689 | Bechthold et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4413504 | Voigtman et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4436428 | Watanabe et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4457162 | Rush et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4529319 | Muller | Jul 1985 | A |
4533252 | Cahen et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4557603 | Oehler et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4622845 | Ryan et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4722602 | Kitamori et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4740086 | Oehler et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4866681 | Fertig | Sep 1989 | A |
5028864 | Lee et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5085080 | Yu | Feb 1992 | A |
5159411 | Hammerich et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5268911 | Young | Dec 1993 | A |
5726752 | Uno et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5753797 | Forster et al. | May 1998 | A |
5766957 | Robinson et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5841017 | Baraket et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5869749 | Bonne et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5900533 | Chou | May 1999 | A |
5913234 | Julliard et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5933245 | Wood et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6006585 | Forster | Dec 1999 | A |
6043884 | Curbelo | Mar 2000 | A |
6070093 | Oosta et al. | May 2000 | A |
6082178 | Bernstein | Jul 2000 | A |
6108096 | Ushio et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6160255 | Sausa | Dec 2000 | A |
6161426 | Byatt | Dec 2000 | A |
6222190 | Bernstein | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6236455 | Autrey et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6344647 | Jourdain et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6466806 | Geva et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6474168 | Meringdal | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6552792 | Pilgrim et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6594016 | Te Lintel Hekkert | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6608683 | Pilgrim et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6644128 | Byatt et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6694173 | Bende et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
7034943 | Moeckli et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7213444 | Baraket et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7245380 | Kosterev | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7263871 | Selker et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7288775 | Fujinoki et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7304732 | Polcawich et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7345766 | Schindler et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7595463 | Weick et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7605922 | Willing et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7663756 | Cole | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7864326 | Cox et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8085403 | Fritz et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8339607 | Levine et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
20020093648 | Nikoonahad et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020093658 | Han | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020158202 | Webber et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020194897 | Arnott et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030038237 | Webber | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030080295 | Webber et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030089170 | Amonette et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030090663 | Autrey et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030090664 | Amonette et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030112019 | Forster et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030184733 | Kameoka et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030188581 | Roudil et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030225320 | Jeon et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040095579 | Bisson et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040114130 | Nguyen et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040127777 | Ruchti et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040128081 | Rabitz et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040179187 | Mettes | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040179200 | Yoon et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050030539 | Uber | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050117155 | Kosterev | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050160791 | Kung | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060123884 | Selker | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060126070 | Kauppinen | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060138327 | Kauppinen | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060217626 | Patel et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060256339 | Lowney | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070151325 | Kauppinen | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070206193 | Pesach | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070229834 | Patel | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080127715 | Kosterev | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090128819 | Van Kesteren et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090174884 | Kosterev | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090229345 | Van Kesteren | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090288474 | Kalkman | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090303476 | Kosterev et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100011836 | Kalkman et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100014086 | Cole | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100033722 | Van Neste et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100043526 | Helwegen | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100045990 | Van Kesteren et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100045991 | Miklos et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100045998 | Fritz | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100101305 | Miklos et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100147051 | Tobias | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110201914 | Wang et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120062896 | Familia et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3817791 | Dec 1989 | DE |
4018393 | Dec 1990 | DE |
4116280 | Dec 1991 | DE |
4411853 | Oct 1995 | DE |
4446723 | Jan 1996 | DE |
102005030151 | Nov 2006 | DE |
102005053121 | May 2007 | DE |
0369176 | May 1990 | EP |
0590813 | Apr 1994 | EP |
829225 | Mar 1996 | EP |
829224 | Mar 1998 | EP |
1386690 | Feb 2004 | EP |
1564543 | Aug 2005 | EP |
1574840 | Sep 2005 | EP |
1574841 | Sep 2005 | EP |
1582857 | Oct 2005 | EP |
2791134 | Sep 2000 | FR |
60-143743 | Jul 1985 | JP |
60-195438 | Oct 1985 | JP |
61-031930 | Feb 1986 | JP |
1-155270 | Jun 1989 | JP |
2002-174626 | Jun 2002 | JP |
WO-9306457 | Apr 1993 | WO |
WO-9602820 | Feb 1996 | WO |
WO-9631765 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO-0223160 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO-02088697 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO-02088698 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO-03100393 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO-2005077061 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO-2005095949 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO-2006072867 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO-2006092751 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO-2006114766 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO-2007056772 | May 2007 | WO |
WO-2008030250 | Mar 2008 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130239658 A1 | Sep 2013 | US |