Patent Application
20080096857
The present method involves the photodynamic treatment of hyperactive sebaceous gland disorders such as acne, seborrhea, seborrheic dermatitis, and sebaceous gland hyperplasia. The method involves the administration of photosensitizer to affected skin and subsequent exposure of that skin to energy of a wavelength capable of activating the photosensitizer. The method can also be used as a prophylactic treatment for skin that is suspected of being vulnerable to hyperactive sebaceous gland disorders. Therefore, as used herein the term “exhibiting symptoms of hyperactive sebaceous gland disorders” includes skin having symptoms and skin that is thought to be susceptible to developing symptoms in the future.
The method may be used to treat mild, moderate or severe acne and all types of acne lesions. Preferably the method is used to treat moderate or severe acne. The present method may also be used to treat seborrhea, seborrheic dermatitis, or sebaceous gland hyperplasia. It is preferred that the affected subject receiving treatment is at least 12 years of age.
The present invention further relates to the use of a topical hydrophobic or lipophilic photosensitizer composition for the treatment of hyperactive sebaceous gland disorders. In addition, the present invention relates to the use of a photosensitizer for the manufacture of a topical hydrophobic or lipophilic photosensitizer composition for use in the treatment of hyperactive sebaceous gland disorders.
of the present invention can penetrate into the hair follicle and sebaceous gland but are only found at low levels in other, surrounding tissues. While not wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that hydrophobic or lipophilic photosensitizer compositions better localize to the sebaceous glands thereby avoiding some of the severe side-effects reported in prior art treatments such as erythema, edema, pain, burning, and itching. It is believed that the selectivity of the present compositions avoids severe skin reactions and other adverse events. Furthermore the hydrophobic or lipophilic properties are thought to enable the photosensitizer to achieve high concentrations in the target organ, the sebaceous glands, that should translate in a greater efficacy, shorter photosensitizer application time, and/or the ability to use lower activation energy doses.
Preferred photodynamic treatment methods, compositions, and parameters are described in more detail below.
In one aspect the present method involves:
It has surprisingly been found that removing the excess photosensitizer does not compromise the efficacy of the treatment and may help avoid unwanted side effects.
The excess composition can be removed by any suitable method. Preferred methods include wiping with dry cloth, wiping with a moist towelette, washing with alcohol, washing with a soap free cleanser, washing with a mild soap cleanser, and combinations thereof. A preferred method of removing the excess composition is to wash the skin with mild shampoo such as Cliniderm.
Preferably the composition is left in contact with the skin for at least 1 minute, more preferably at least 5 minutes, even more preferably at least 15 minutes, before removal of excess.
Preferably the composition is left in contact with the skin for less than 120 minutes, more preferably less than 60 minutes, even more preferably less than 45 minutes, before removal of excess.
While not wishing to be bound by theory, it is also believed that the removal of the excess composition could avoid the photosensitizer in the excess creating a ‘shadow’ which would prevent the activation energy from reaching the target tissue (e.g. the sebaceous gland).
In another aspect the present method involves:
The treatment can be repeated any suitable number of times. It is preferred that at least two days, preferably at least five days, more preferably at least seven days, even more preferably at least ten days, even more preferably still fourteen days, are left between treatments.
In another aspect the method involves:
For the treatment of acne, the present methods may be combined with other methods of treating acne. Known acne treatments include but are not limited to topical retinoids, oral retinoids, antibiotics (especially topical), oral contraceptives, anti-androgens (especially topical), anti-progestins, blue light therapy, laser therapy, and combinations thereof.
Non-limiting examples of suitable therapies for being combined with herewith include tazarotene, isotretinoin, clindamycin, atrisone (from Atrix Labs), MBI594AN (from Micrologix), Smoothbeam 1450 mn Laser therapy, and Blue-light PhotoTherapy.
A preferred embodiment of this aspect is to combine PDT treatment with topical acne treatments, especially topical retinoid treatment. While not wishing to be bound bytheory, it is believed that the PDT causes a marked decrease in sebum production. This allows the topical agents greater access to the hair follicle and the sebaceous gland which increases efficacy.
One embodiment of this aspect involves a composition comprising photosensitizer and at least one other topical agent used in the treatment of acne such as a retinoid or an anti-androgen. In this way the active agents may be delivered at the same time avoiding the necessity of applying two compositions to the same area.
Preferably, the photosensitizer herein is delivered topically to the target tissue. Topical delivery avoids some of the photosensitivity issues associated with systemic delivery of photosensitizers. When the photosensitizer is applied topically it may be applied to the affected tissue alone or to the affected tissue and to unaffected tissues such as those surrounding the affected tissue.
Any suitable photosensitizing agent or mixture of agents may be used herein. Typically, these agents will absorb radiation in the range of from 400 nm to 900 nm, preferably from 450 nm to 750 nm, more preferably 500 nm to 700 nm.
As used herein, “photosensitizer” or “photosensitizing agent” means a chemical compound that absorbs electromagnetic radiation, most commonly in the visible spectrum, and releases it as energy, most commonly as reactive oxygen species and/or as thermal energy. Preferably, the compound is nontoxic to humans or is capable of being formulated in a nontoxic composition. Preferably, the chemical compound in its photodegraded form is also nontoxic. A non-exhaustive list of photosensitive chemicals maybe found in Kreiner-Birnbaum, Sem. Hematol. 26:157-73, 1989 and in Redmond and Gamlin, Photochem. Photbiol. 70 (4): 391-475 (1999) both of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Preferred photosensitizers are those having a LogP value of 0 or greater. Preferably, the LogP of the photosensitizers herein is not less than 0.5, more preferably not less than 0.75, even more preferably not less than 1.0.
It is preferred that the photosensitizer composition used in the present methods is lipophilic.
Preferred photosensitizers are those having a molecular weight of 200 g/mole or greater, more preferably 350 g/mole or greater, even more preferably 500 g/mole or greater. While not wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that the higher molecular weight photosensitizers do not easily accumulate in non-target tissues such as the epidermis. This is believed to reduce the unwanted side effects such as pain.
Photosensitizers that strongly absorb light with extinction coefficients >10,000 M−1cm−1 are preferred.
There are a variety of preferred synthetic and naturally occurring photosensitizers, including, but not limited to, pro-drugs such as the pro-porphyrin 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) and derivatives thereof, porphyrins and porphyrin derivatives e.g. chlorins, bacteriochlorins, isobacteriochlorins, phthalocyanine and naphthalocyanines and other tetra- and poly- macrocyclic compounds, and related compounds (e.g. pyropheophorbides, sapphyrins and texaphyrins) and metal complexes (such as, but not limited by, tin, aluminum, zinc, lutetium). Tetrahydrochlorins, purpurins, porphycenes, and phenothiaziniums are also within the scope of the invention. Other suitable photosensitizers include bacteriochlorophyll derivatives such as those described in WO-A-97/19081, WO-A-99/45382 and WO-A-01/40232. A preferred bacteriochlorophyll is palladium-bacteriopheophorbide WST09 (Tookad™). Preferably the photosensitizers are selected from pro-porphyrins, porphyrins, and mixures thereof. Some examples of pro-drugs include aminolevulinic acid such as Levulan™ and aminolevulinic acid esters such as described in WO-A-02/10120 and available as Metvix™, Hexvix™ and Benzvix™. Some examples of di-hydro or tetra-hydro porphyrins are described in EP-A-337,601 or WO-A-01/66550 and available as Foscan™ (temoporfin). Combinations of two or more photosensitizers maybe used in the practice of the invention.
In certain embodiments it is preferred that the photosensitizers are selected from those which photobleach upon exposure to activation energy.
A particularly potent group of photosensitizers is known as green porphyrins, which are described in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 5,171,749 (incorporated herein by reference). The term “green porphyrins” refers to porphyrin derivatives obtained by reacting a porphyrin nucleus with an alkyne in a Diels-Alder type reaction to obtain a mono- hydrobenzoporphyrin. Such resultant macropyrrolic compounds are called benzoporphyrin derivatives (BPDs), which is a synthetic chlorin-like porphyrin with various structural analogues, as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,171,749. Typically, green porphyrins are selected from a group of tetrapyrrolic porphyrin derivatives obtained by Diels-Alder reactions of acetylene derivatives with protoporphyrin under conditions that promote reaction at only one of the two available conjugated, nonaromatic diene structures present in the protoporphyrin-IX ring systems (rings A and B). Metallated forms of a Gp, in which a metal cation replaces one or two hydrogens in the center of the ring system, may also be used in the practice of the invention. The preparation of the green porphyrin compounds useful in this invention is described in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 5,095,030 (incorporated herein by reference). Preferred green porphyrins include benzoporphyrin derivative diester di-acid (BPD-DA), mono-acid ring A (BPD-MA), mono-acid ring B (BPD-MB), or mixtures thereof. These compounds absorb light at about 692 nm wavelength which has good tissue penetration properties. The compounds of formulas BPD-MA and BPD-MB may be homogeneous, in which only the C ring carbalkoxyethyl or only the D ring carbalkoxyethyl would be hydrolyzed, or may be mixtures of the C and D ring substituent hydrolyzates. A number of other BPD B-ring derivatives may also be used in the present invention. These derivatives have the following general formula:
wherein; R5 is vinyl, R1 and R6 are methyl, and n is 2. X1, X2, and X3 are listed in the tables below:
Preferred photosensitizers include verteporfin the benzoporphyrin derivative mono-acid (BPD-MA), lemuteporfin (QLT0074 as set forth in U.S. Pat. No. 5,929,105 referred to therein as A-EA6) and B3 (as set forth in U.S. Pat. No. 5,990,149). A highly preferred photosensitizer is lemuteporfin which has the structure:
Additionally, the photosensitizers may be conjugated to various ligands to facilitate targeting. These ligands include receptor-specific peptides and/orc ligands as well as immunoglobulins and fragments thereof. Preferred ligands include antibodies in general and monoclonal antibodies, as well as immunologically reactive fragments of both.
Dimeric forms of the green porphyrin and dimeric or multimeric forms of green porphyrin/porphyrin combinations can be used. The dimers and oligomeric compounds of the invention can be prepared using reactions analogous to those for dimerization and oligomerization of porphyrins per se. The green porphyrins or green porphyrin/porphyrin linkages can be made directly, or porphyrins may be coupled, followed by a Diels-Alder reaction of either or both terminal porphyrins to convert them to the corresponding green porphyrins.
In addition to the above mentioned photosensitizing agents, other examples of photosensitizers include, but are not limited to, green porphyrins disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,283,255, 4,920,143, 4,883,790, 5,095,030, and 5,171,749; and green porphyrin derivatives, discussed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,880,145 and 5,990,149. Several structures of typical green porphyrins are shown in the above cited patents, which also provide details for the production of the compounds.
The photosensitizer may be administered in any form suitable for topical application. The photosensitizer may be used alone or as components of mixtures. For example, the photosensitizer maybe administered by means including, but not limited to, lotions, ointments, creams, pastes, or suspensions. Preferred are lotions, creams, and ointments.
The photosensitizers may be formulated into a variety of compositions. These compositions may comprise any component that is suitable for the intended purpose, such as conventional delivery vehicles and excipients including isotonising agents, pH regulators, solvents, solubilizers, dyes, gelling agents and thickeners and buffers and combinations thereof. Pharmaceutical formulations suitable for use with the instant photosensitizers can be found, for instance, in Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences. Preferred formulations herein comprise pharmaceutical excipients or carriers capable of directing the photosensitizer to the sebaceous gland. Suitable excipients for use with photosensitizers include water, saline, dextrose, glycerol and the like.
Typically, the photosensitizer is formulated by mixing it, at an appropriate temperature, e.g., at ambient temperatures, and at appropriate pHs, and the desired degree of purity, with one or more physiologically acceptable carriers, i.e., carriers that are nontoxic at the dosages and concentrations employed.
Preferred formulations are described in WO03/39597. The formulations preferably comprise a skin-penetration enhancer. Any skin-penetration enhancer suitable for aiding the delivery of the photosensitizing agent can be used herein. A list of skin-penetration enhancers can be found in “Pharmaceutical Skin Penetration Enhancement” (1993) Walters, K. A., ed.; Hadgraft, J., ed-New York, N.Y. Marcel Dekker and in “Skin Penetration Enhancers cited in the Technical Literature” Osbourne, D. W. Pharmaceutical Technology, November 1997, pp 59-65, both of which are incorporated herein by reference. Preferred for use in the formulations herein are hydrophobic skin-penetration enhancers. Preferred skin-penetration enhancers are selected from glycol ethers, fatty acids, fatty acid esters, glycol esters, glycerides, azones, polysorbates, alcohols, dimethylsulfoxide, and mixtures thereof. Preferred skin-penetration enhancers for use herein include, but are not limited to, diethylene glycol monoethyl ether (Transcutol®), Oleyl alcohol, Oleic acid, Azone (Laurocapram or 1-n-Dodecyl azacycloheptan-2-one), Propylene glycol mono- and diesters of fats and fatty acids (e.g. propylene glycol monocaprylate, propylene glycol monolaurate), Triglycerides and lipids (e.g. linoleic acid), Macrogolglycerides or Polyethylene glycol glycerides and fatty esters (e.g. stearoyl macrogolglycerides, oleoyl macrogolglycerides, lauroyl macrogolglycerides, Oleyl macrogol-6-glycerides, Lauroyl macrogol-6 glycerides), Glycerides and fatty acid esters of polyethylene glycol (e.g. caprylocaproyl macrogolglycerides, capryl-caproyl macrogolglycerides, oleoyl macrogol glycerides), Polyoxyl 40 Hydrogenated Castor Oil (Cremophor RH 40), Polysorbate 80 Tween 80), Dodecylazacycloheptanone, SEPA® such as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,861,764 (e.g. 2-n-nonyl-1,3-dioxolane), and mixtures thereof. More preferred is diethylene glycol monoethyl ether (available from Gattefosse under the tradename Transcutol).
It is preferred that the formulations comprise from about 0.1% to about 99%, preferably from about 0.1% to about 90%, more preferably from about 5% to about 90%, even more preferably from about 15% to about 75%, by weight of skin penetration enhancer.
It is preferred that the ratio of photosensitizer to skin-penetration enhancer is from about 1:20 to about 1:10000, more preferably from about 1:60 to 1:300, on the basis of percentages by weight of total composition.
It is preferred that the photosensitizer is solubilised, especially when the photosensitizer is hydrophobic or lipophilic. One method of solubilising certain photosensitizers, including green porphyrins, is by formulation in liposomes or other lipid-containing complexes. An alternative may be to solubilise the photosensitizer in cyclodextrins or cyclodextrin derivatives. Preferred are partially etherified cyclodextrin, the ether substituents of which are hydroxyethyl, hydroxypropyl or dihydroxypropyl groups. However, appropriate cyclodextrins should be of a size and conformation appropriate for use with the photosensitizing agents disclosed herein.
A hydrophilic photosensitizer can also be formulated into a hydrophobic carrier formulation by, for example, encapsulating the photosensitizer in liposomes.
Other methods suitable for solubilising certain photosensitizers include the use of a solvent acceptable for use in the treatment of skin tissues and cells such as, but are not limited to, DMSO (dimethylsulfoxide), polyethylene glycol (PEG) or any other solvent. It is preferred that the formulations herein comprise a solubilizer. Some solubilizers are also penetration enhancers and it is preferred that the formulations herein comprise a penetration enhancer that is also a solubilizer for the photosensitizer. Preferably the solubilizer is selected from glycol ethers, polyethylene glycol, polyethylene glycol derivatives, propylene glycol, propylene glycol derivatives, polysorbates (e.g. Tween™), fatty alcohols, aromatic alcohols, propylene glycol, glycerols, oils, surfactants, glucosides, and miures thereof. More preferably the solubilizer is selected from diethylene glycol monoethyl ether (Transcutol), polyethylene glycol of average molecular weight from 100 to 5000, triethylene glycol, tetraethylene glycol, pentaethylene glycol, hexaethylene glycol, septaethylene glycol, octaethylene glycol, propylene glycol, propylene glycol mono- and diesters of fats and fatty acids (e.g. propylene glycol monocaprylate, propylene glycol monolaurate), benzyl alcohol, glycerol, oleyl alcohol, mineral oil, lanolin/lanolin derivatives, petrolatum or other petroleum products suitable for application to the skin, propylene glycol mono- and diesters of fats and fatty acids, macrogols, macrogolglycerides or polyethylene glycol glycerides and fatty esters (e.g. stearoyl macrogolglycerides, oleoyl macrogolglycerides, lauroyl macrogolglycerides, linoleoyl macrogolglycerides), ethoxylated castor oil (e.g. Cremophor—a polyoxyl hydrogenated castor oil), C6-C30 triglycerides, natural oils, glucosides (e.g. cetearyl glucoside), surfactants, and mures thereof. More preferable the solubilizer is selected from diethylene glycol monoethyl ether (Transcutol), oleyl alcohol, and mixtures thereof .
It is preferred that the formulations herein comprise from about 0.1% to about 99%, more preferably from about 1% to about 75%, by weight of solubilizer. It is preferred that the formulations have a viscosity at 20° C. of from about 50 cps to about 50000 cps, more preferably from about 500 cps to about 40000 cps, even more preferably from about 5000 cps to about 30000 cps. Should the viscosity need to be adjusted it can be done by means of a viscosity modifying agent. Preferred viscosity modifiers are selected from polyethylene glycols, acrylic acid-based polymers (carbopol polymers or carbomers), polymers of acrylic acid crosslinked with allyl sucrose or allylpentaerythritol (carbopol homopolymers), polymers of acrylic acid modified by long chain (C10-C30) alkyl acrylates and crosslinked with allylpentaerythritol (carbopol copolymers), poloxamers also known as pluronics (block polymers; e.g. Poloxamer 124, 188, 237, 338, 407), waxes (paraffin, glyceryl monostearate, diethylene glycol monostearate, propylene glycol monostearate, ethylene glycol monosterate, glycol stearate), hard fats (e.g. Saturated C8-C18 fatty acid glycerides), xantham gum, polyvinyl alcohol, solid alcohols, and mixtures thereof.
Preferred formulations contain one or more PEGs. It is preferred that the formulation comprises at least one PEG of average molecular weight about 2000 or less, preferably about 1500 or less, preferably about 1000 or less, preferably about 800 or less, preferably about 600 or less, preferably about 500 or less, preferably about 400 or less. It is preferred that the formulation comprises at least one PEG of average molecular weight about 3000 or more, preferably about 3350 or more, preferably about 3500 or more. It is preferred that the formulation comprises a mixture of PEG's. More preferably, one PEG has an average molecular weight of about 800 or less and one PEG has an average molecular weight of 3000 or more.
A preferred formulation for use in the present invention comprises photosensitizer (especially green-porphyrins), low molecular weight PEG such as PEG200, diethylene glycol monoethyl ether (Transcutol), high molecular weight PEG such as PEG3350 and fatty alcohol such as oleyl alcohol.
The formulation herein may comprise a variety of other components. Any suitable ingredient maybe used herein but typically these optional components will render the formulations more cosmetically acceptable or provide additional usage benefits. Some examples of preferred optional ingredients include, but are not limited to, emulsifiers, humectants, emollients, surfactants, oils, waxes, fatty alcohols, dispersants, skin-benefit agents, pH adjusters, dyes/colourants, analgesics, perfumes, preservatives, and mies thereof.
Preparation of dry formulations that are reconstituted immediately before use also is contemplated. The preparation of dry or lyophilized formulations can be effected in a known manner, conveniently from the solutions of the invention. The dry formulations of this invention are also storable. By conventional techniques, a solution can be evaporated to dryness under mild conditions, especially after the addition of solvents for azeotropic removal of water, typically a mixture of toluene and ethanol. The residue is thereafter conveniently dried, e.g. for some hours in a drying oven.
For topical formulations (such as ointments) to be applied to the surface of the skin, the concentration of the photosensitizer in the excipient preferably ranges from about 0.001 to about 10% w/w, and more preferably from about 0.005 to about 5% w/w, and even more preferably between about 0.01 to about 1% w/w. Particularly preferred is the use of about a 0.2% w/w topical formulation.
Preferably sufficient time is left between delivery of the photosensitizer and administration of the activation energy to allow the photosensitizer to distribute within the target tissue. The exact length of time can vary according to the type of photosensitizer and the target tissue but, in general, it is preferred that 10 seconds or more, more preferably 1 minute or more, more preferably 5 minutes or more, is left between delivery of the photosensitizer and administration of the activation energy. Preferably the time between delivery of the drug and activation energy is 240 minutes or less, more preferably 180 minutes or less, even more preferably 60 minutes or less. Wile not wishing to be bound by theory, shorter contact times are thought to be preferably because there is less time for the photosensitizer to accumulate in non-target tissues and a consequent reduction in the incidence and/or severity of side-effects.
Preferably the photosensitizer is delivered in a topical composition and is left in contact with the skin for 5 to 60 minutes. If necessary, excess composition can be preferably removed by any suitable means. Preferred means include wiping with dry cloth, wiping with a moist towelette, washing with alcohol, washing with a soap free cleanser, washing with a mild soap cleanser, and combinations thereof. Thereafter, it is preferred that the activation energy is delivered to the skin. This period will vary depending on the photosensitizer and the method of delivery. For example, lemuteporfin delivered topically can be activated shortly after application whereas ALA requires a delay while the ALA is metabolized into the photosensitive active.
Preferably, the activation energy comprises a wavelength close to at least one of the absorption peaks of the photosensitizer. This wavelength differs for different photosensitizers. For example, BPD-MA has an absorption peak at 689 nm and so, when BPD-MA is the photosensitizer used, the wavelength of the activation energy is preferably is at or close to 689 nm. The photosensitizer ALA-methyl ester (available under the tradename Metvix) has an absorption peak at 635 nm and so when this photosensitizer is used the activation energy is preferable at or close to 635 nm. ALA (available under the tradename Levulan) has an absorption peak at 417 nm and at 630 nm so when this photosensitizer is used the activation energy is preferable at or close to 417 nm and/or 630 nm.
The activation energy herein may be provided by any suitable means. Generally, the activation energy is provided by a visible light source although it has been suggested that x-ray, ultraviolet, or ultrasound sources may be used. Preferred sources include, but are not limited to, lasers, light emitting diodes (LED), incandescent lamps, arc lamps, standard fluorescent lamps, U.V. lamps, and combinations thereof. More preferred are light emitting diodes. Alternatively, any convenient source of activation energy having a component of wavelengths that are absorbed by the photosensitizer may be used, for example, an operating room lamp, or any bright light source, including sunlight. Commercially available activation energy sources include CureLight™ (available from Photocure ASA, Oslo, Norway), BLU-U™ (available from DUSA, Wilmington, Mass., USA), PDT Laser (available from Diomed, Andover, Mass., USA), Ceralas™ (available from Biolitec AG, Jena, Germany), Omnilux PDT™ (available from PhotoTherapeutics Ltd., Birmingham, UK),. and QBeam & Ouanta-med (Quantum Devices Inc., Barneveld, Wis., USA).
The activation energy dose administered during the PDT treatment contemplated herein can vary as necessary. Preferably, for photosensitizers of high potency, such as green porphytins, the dosage of the light is about 25-100 J/cm2. It is generally preferred that the total dose of the irradiation should generally not exceed 400 J/cm2, preferably 200 J/cm2, or more preferably not exceed 100 J/cm2. Preferred doses can range between about 0.1 J/cm2 to about 200 J/cm2, more preferably 1 J/cm2 to about 100 J/cm2. For example, about 25, about 50, about 75, about 100, about 125, about 150, or about 175 J/cm2. More preferred doses range from about 25 J/cm2 to about 100 J/cm2.
Normally, the intensity of the energy source should not exceed about 600 mW/cm2. Irradiances between about 0.1 and 400 mW/cm2 are preferred. Even more preferably the irradiance is between 5 and 100 mW/cm2.
Normally, the irradiation lasts from about 10 seconds to about 4 hours, and preferably between about 5 minutes and 1 hour. For example, irradiation times of about 10, about 15, about 20, about 30, about 45, about 60, about 75, about 90, about 105, about 120, about 135, about 150, about 165 and about 180 minutes maybe used.
It is preferred that the area to be treated have minimal hair coverage when the activation energy is applied. Therefore, if there is significant hair coverage of the area to be treated, it is preferred that the hair is cut short or shaved prior to activation energy application. Vile not wishing to be bound by theory it is believed that, due to the fact that hair has a shielding function, hair coverage can affect the activation energy dose that is delivered to the target area, especially when visible light wavelengths are used. Consequently, in order to more accurately deliver the correct does it is preferred that there be little or no hair coverage. Alternatively, the shielding effect of the hair may be compensated for by changes to delivery of the activation energy.
The irradiation or light exposure used in the invention may be directed to a small or large area of the body or face depending on the patch to be treated. Any part of the body may be treated but acne typically affects the face, chest, and/or back. Treatment may be preceded with an assessment of the time of light exposure for the patient's minimal erythemal dose (MED) occurrence in order to avoid potential burning of the exposed skin.
The treatment maybe repeated as many times as is necessary. If repeated, the treatment frequency may vary. For example, the treatments could be daily, every two days, twice weekly, weekly, every two weeks, twice monthly, every four weeks, monthly, every six weeks, every eight weeks, every two months, quarterly, twice annually, or annually, or other suitable time interval. Preferably the treatment is not repeated more than once per week even more preferably not more than once every two weeks. Preferably, the treatment is repeated at least once every six months. More preferably at least once every three months. Even more preferably at least once every two months. The total number of treatments can range from one to as many as required. It is preferred that the total number of treatments in any 6 month period be from 1 to 12, more preferably from 1 to 6, even more preferably from 2 to 3.
A preferred regimen according to the present invention comprises:
It will be understood that the following embodiments of the present invention are intended to be illustrative of some of the possible applications or principles. Various modifications maybe made by the skilled person without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention.
The effect of different red light doses on the mouse sebaceous glands in response to PDT was evaluated. Lemuteporfin ointment was applied to shaved flank skin of male Balb/c mice and left on for 30 min. Excess material was removed from the skin surface and the site was exposed to a 688-nm red light dose of 25, 50, 100, 200 or 400 J/cm2 delivered at an intensity of 50 mW/cm2. Three days later, mice were euthanized and full-thickness skin excised from the PDT treatment site as well as the untreated contra-lateral side. Skin samples were processed, sectioned and stained for lipid using Oil Red O. Numbers of Oil Red O-positive pilosebaceous units (PSU) per 4× microscopic image were determined by two independent readers. At all light doses the number of Oil Red O-positive PSU was less for the PDT-treated sites than for untreated sites.
Patients with moderate to severe acne as defined by the presence of pustular and or cystic lesions, with or without scarring, are assessed for PDT treatment with lemuteporfin 0.2% ointment. Prior to treatment, the areas to be treated with PDT are cleansed and cleared of any hair, skin lotions or cosmetic products.
Topical photosensitizer ointment (comprising 0.2 wt % lemuteporfin, 50 wt % PEG-200, 24 wt % Transcutol®, 10 wt % PEG-3350 and 15.8 wt % oleyl alcohol) is applied directly on the acne affected skin at a quantity of approximately 45 mg /cm2. The ointment is left on for absorption for 20-45 minutes. Immediately prior to light treatment, excess ointment is removed by gentle wiping with a water-based skin cleanser. Acne lesions and the immediate surrounding areas are illuminated with 689 nm PDT light at a dose of 100 J/cm2 with an intensityof 50 mW/cm2.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2,457,214 | Feb 2004 | CA | national |
| 2,470,403 | Jun 2004 | CA | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/CA05/00154 | 2/8/2005 | WO | 00 | 10/15/2007 |
