The present invention relates generally to conductors, and in particular to transparent conductors used as electrodes in microelectronic devices such as displays.
Materials that are transparent to visible light and that also conduct electricity are useful in applications where electricity needs to be delivered to electrical components, but where the conductor must not optically obstruct the electrical components. Such transparent conductors have found particular use as electrodes for various types of microelectronic devices, and in particular displays, such as liquid crystal, plasma, and electroluminescent displays, as well as see-through displays such as “heads-up” displays used, for example, in aircraft and virtual-reality systems. Electrode transparency is required in most thin, high-resolution displays because space limitations require that at least some of the electrodes cover at least a portion of the particular light-emitting devices used as the display pixels. To the extent such electrodes are not perfectly optically transmitting (transparent), they tend to reduce the overall brightness and quality of the displayed image.
Typical conducting films used as electrodes are tin-doped indium oxide, fluorine-doped tin oxide, or doped zinc oxide. The transparent conducting films made from these metal oxides are usually formed on glass or ceramic substrates. Known methods of forming transparent conducting films include chemical vapor deposition (CVD) methods (e.g., plasma CVD methods and light CVD methods), physical vapor deposition (PVD) methods (e.g., vacuum evaporation methods, ion plating methods and sputtering methods), and various coating methods.
All transparent conducting films have about the same optical transmittance and about the same resistivity for a given film thickness. Of all transparent conducting films, indium tin oxide (ITO) films have the lowest resistivity, e.g., ˜10−4 Ohm-cm for a ˜120 nm thick film. However, the resistance of transparent conducting films can limit the size of a device, such as a display, that calls for extended lengths of conducting film. The size limit is due to the voltage drop over the length of the conductor, which is calculated from the surface resistance of the conducting film.
For many applications, including displays, it would be beneficial to have transparent conductors with higher conductivity (lower resistivity) and greater transparency than is presently available with transparent conducting films. Ideally, it would be beneficial to have a transparent conductor with the high conductivity of otherwise opaque conductors such as copper, gold, silver, platinum and the like.
A first aspect of the invention is a photonic-crystal (PC) conductor assembly that includes a photonic-crystal cloaking element (PCCE) configured to have a cloaked interior region, and at least one opaque conductor arranged in the interior region so that the at least one conductor is rendered transparent to light of a select wavelength band incident upon the PCCE.
One embodiment of the present invention is PC transparent-conductor assembly. The assembly includes a photonic crystal element having an elongate, radially symmetric dielectric annular body with an outer surface having an outer radius b, and an inner surface having inner radius a. The inner surface defines an interior region. The photonic crystal body has a plurality of cylindrical holes formed therein and configured, in combination with the inner and outer radii, to provide the photonic crystal body with a permittivity ε and a permeability μ that satisfies the following cloaking relationships over a select wavelength range:
wherein r is a radial direction, z is an axial direction and θ is an angular direction. The assembly also includes at least one conducting element being substantially opaque over at least a portion of the select wavelength range. The conducing element is arranged in the interior region of the photonic crystal body so that light within the select wavelength range that is incident upon the photonic crystal body at one portion of the outer surface at an original trajectory is trapped in the photonic crystal body and exits the photonic crystal body at another outer surface portion without passing through the at least one conductor and with its original trajectory. This has the effect of rendering the conductor transparent.
Another aspect of the present invention is a method of forming a transparent conductor from an otherwise opaque conductor. The method includes forming a PC element to have a refractive index profile that results in a cloaked interior region. The method also includes arranging at least one opaque conductor in the interior region so that the at least one conductor is rendered transparent to light of a select wavelength band incident upon the photonic crystal. An optional embodiment of the method is to arrange a number of such PC elements side by side with conductors contained therein to create an array of (effectively) transparent conducting elements.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description present example embodiments of the invention, and are intended to provide an overview or framework for understanding the nature and character of the invention as it is claimed. The accompanying drawings are included to provide a further understanding of the invention, and are incorporated into and constitute a part of this specification. The drawings illustrate the various exemplary embodiments of the invention and together with the description serve to explain the principles and operations of the invention.
Reference is now made in detail to the present preferred embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Whenever possible, like or similar reference numerals are used throughout the drawings to refer to like or similar parts. Various modifications and alterations may be made to the following examples within the scope of the present invention, and aspects of the different examples may be mixed in different ways to achieve yet further examples. Accordingly, the true scope of the invention is to be understood from the entirety of the present disclosure, in view of but not limited to the embodiments described herein.
The present invention is directed to a photonic-crystal (PC)-based conductor assembly (“PC transparent-conductor assembly”) that includes a photonic-crystal cloaking element (“PCCE”) that surrounds at least one opaque conducting element. The PCCE has a refractive index distribution that “cloaks” the at least one conductor contained therein, effectively rendering it “transparent” over a select wavelength band. This allows for the formation of a “transparent conductor” from an otherwise opaque conductor. One or more such PC transparent-conductor assemblies can be configured in a manner such that a pattern of otherwise opaque conducting elements can be rendered transparent to provide an array of transparent electrodes for a variety of electric-field-driven optical devices.
The term “transparent” as the term is used herein to describe the otherwise opaque conductor means that the PCCE surrounding the conductor creates the optical effect of transparency by virtue of its refractive index distribution. That is to say, light that is incident the PC transparent-conductor assembly is caused by the PCCE to bend around the conductor in a manner that maintains the original path of the light when the light exits the PCCE. It thus appears to an observer that the light did not encounter any object, so that neither the conductor nor the PCCE are actually seen by the observer. Thus, not only is the conductor within the PCCE cloaked, but the PCCE that creates the cloaking effect is also cloaked because it too remains invisible to the observer.
The theoretical basis for cloaking is described, for example, in the article by Pendry et al., “Controlling electromagnetic fields,” Science, vol. 312, pp. 1780-1782, 23 June 2006, and in the article by Shurig et al., “Metamaterial electromagnetic cloak at microwave frequencies,” Science, vol. 314, pp. 977-978, 10 Nov. 2006, which articles are both incorporated by reference herein. It should be noted here that the basic relationship between the refractive index n, the electric permittivity (“permittivity”) ε and the magnetic permeability μ (“permeability”) is given by Maxwell's formula n=(εμ)1/2.
The approach in the Pendry article starts with the principle that light also does not travel in straight lines in non-Euclidean metric spaces. The shortest distance between two points, and therefore the path of a light ray, is defined through the variational “shortest time” condition. For a 2-D metric space, this takes the form of Eq. (1), where g11 and g22 are elements of the metric tensor of the space:
The approach involves defining a transformation to such a space that would produce cloaking (have light bend around an object and continue on its original path), but then to reduce it to a flat space (whose coordinates are denoted by primes). The transformation is given by:
ds
2
=dx′
1
2
+dx′
2
2 Eq. (2)
The following transformation then maps the interior of a circle to an annulus:
where a and b are the inner and outer radii of the annulus.
One must now redefine the “material” constitutive properties—namely, the dielectric tensor—in order to obtain the behavior of light as if it were in a Cartesian flat space. One defines a material world where the dielectric functions (as well as all material parameters) are not constant but vary in space. One can explicitly obtain the relationship of the dielectric tensor ε′ij that determines the pattern that is to be constructed to provide the cloak:
Because ε′ij is a tensor, it has directional properties that make it challenging to form a corresponding physical structure. For simple cases, like specific polarization states of the incident light, (e.g., TE or TM), construction of the corresponding index profile is within experimental capabilities for the microwave regime. In the visible, however, varying the permittivity in the manner required by Eq. (4) is very difficult. However, considering only TM light flips the roles of (magnetic) permeability μ and the (dielectric constant) permittivity ε, enabling a structure with a constant permeability μ. The radial variation of the structure now occurs in the radial component of permittivity, namely εr, which makes the formation of a visible-wavelength cloaking structure more easily achievable. For example, a refractive index structure for visible-wavelength light includes annular segments of thin metal wires oriented radially from the structure's center. The geometry of the wire produces the necessary anisotropy of the material response, while the radial configuration produces the required variation of εr with radius.
The various theoretical approaches for creating a cloaking structure have a number of serious shortcomings with respect to the practicality of the implementation and the availability of materials that can form the requisite structure to exhibit the required cloaking behavior. Implementation issues have to do with the scale of the structure relative to the wavelength of light, while the material-related issues have to do with the ability to produce materials with the required refractive index profile. For example, depending on the specific approach used, some index profiles require a large positive refractive index while others might require a negative refractive index. This, when coupled with the required pattern of the index profile to achieve cloaking in more than one direction, the fabrication of the requisite optical structure remains quite daunting.
A photonic crystal is a dielectric structure having a periodic variation in dielectric constant ε. The periodic structure may be 1-, 2- or 3-dimensional. The photonic crystal allows passage of certain light wavelengths and prevents passage of certain other light wavelengths. Thus, the photonic crystals are said to have “allowed light wavelength bands” and a “band gap” that define the wavelength bands that are excluded from the crystal.
Light having a wavelength in the band gap may not pass through the photonic crystal. However, light having a wavelength in bands above and below the band gap may propagate through the crystal. A photonic crystal exhibits a set of band gaps, which are analogous to the solutions of the Bragg scattering equation. The band gaps are determined by the pattern and period of the variation in dielectric constant. Thus, the periodic array that forms the variation in dielectric constant acts as a Bragg scatterer of light of certain wavelengths, in analogy with the Bragg scattering of x-ray wavelengths by atoms in a lattice. Note that the effective refractive index neff of a mode is another way of expressing the propagation constant k(z) through the simple expression k(z)=(2π/λ)neff.
Methods of fabricating photonic crystals include, for example, the methods disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,925,840, entitled “Method of making a photonic crystal preform,” U.S. Pat. No. 6,496,632, entitled “Method of fabricating photonic structures,” U.S. Pat. No. 6,444,133, entitled “Method of making photonic band gap fibers,” U.S. Pat. No. 6,260,388, entitled “Method of fabricating photonic glass structures by extruding, sintering and drawing,” and U.S. Pat. No. 6,243,522, entitled “Photonic crystal fiber,” which patents are assigned to Corning, Inc. (and which are referred to hereinbelow as “the Corning Patents”), and which are all incorporated by reference herein.
Equation (4) above sets forth the general requirements for the permittivity ε for PCCE 10 to have cloaking capability, and in particular specifies the variation of the permittivity ε as a function of the radial coordinate r. It is useful to normalize the radial coordinate r to inner radius a, and to express the outer radius b in terms of inner radius a, such as b=4a/3.
From Equation (4), the equations describing the variation of the permittivity ε and permeability μ as a function of radius r are as follows:
If only the electric field polarized along the z-axis (i.e., the TE mode) is considered, then the material response is limited to the z-component of the permittivity εz and the r- and θ-components of the permeability εr and εθ. To illustrate the trajectories of the waves within photonic crystal 12, one need only consider the products εzμr and εzμθ. The radial dependence of these products allows one to consider the simplified set of relations:
For the case where the magnetic field is polarized along the z-axis (TM, the products μzεr and μzεθ are the only ones that need to be considered. The radial dependence of a simplified set of relations is:
The only difference between these simplified relations and the original expressions set forth in Equations (5A-5C) is that there will be some reflectivity from photonic crystal 12 at outer surface 20b in the simplified case. The trajectories of the waves within the photonic crystals are the same.
An example of how the effective refractive index neff can be made to vary with normalized wavelength (λ/Λ) as a function of the normalized hole size (ρ/Λ) is now discussed for the TM mode only.
To ascertain the magnitude of the variation in permittivity ε that can be expected from changing the value of ρ/Λ, a given mode and a value for normalized wavelength λ/Λ is chosen. The permittivity εr is then plotted against the normalized hole size (i.e., normalized hole radius) ρ/Λ. Such a plot is shown in
The data of
In an example embodiment, conductor 110 is formed from a highly conductive, non-transparent metal, and in a preferred embodiment, the metal is or includes copper, which has a very high conductivity of 10−6 Ohm.cm. In an example embodiment, conductor 110 includes at least one of gold, silver, aluminum, platinum, and copper.
Because PCCE 10 is designed to have cloaking capability, conductor 110 within interior region 30 is effectively rendered transparent. In fact, not only is conductor 110 rendered transparent, but PCCE is also transparent. Thus, PC transparent-conductor assembly as a whole is invisible over a select wavelength band, which in an example embodiment includes one or more visible wavelengths. This allows for conductor 110 to be inherently opaque while still remaining invisible due to the optical properties of PCCE 10. In a particular example embodiment, the select wavelength band includes the red, green and blue wavelengths (e.g., λR=630 nm, λG=532 nm and λB=465 nm, respectively) typically associated with color displays.
Substrate 208 operably supports an array of light-generating elements or pixels 210. Pixels 210 can be, for example, plasma-discharge cells for a plasma display, liquid-crystal pixels for a liquid crystal display (LCD), etc. Pixels 210 are electrically interconnected by an electrode array 216 made up of electrodes 218 (e.g., so-called “scan” and “sustain” electrodes). Electrode array 216 includes at least one electrode 218 formed by PC transparent-conductor assembly 100. Further in an example embodiment, the at least one electrode 218 formed by PC transparent-conductor assembly 100 is electrically connected to at least one pixel 210. Display 200 is the type wherein at least one of electrodes 218 needs to be transparent so that it does not obstruct light generated by pixels 210. In an example embodiment, at least a portion of electrode array 216 is formed by PC transparent-conductor assemblies 100 so that the corresponding portion of the array, or the entire array, is transparent.
An advantage of using PC transparent-conductor assemblies 100 for electrodes 218 is that the electrodes can have the high conductivity (i.e., low resistivity of ˜10−6 Ohm-cm) of non-transparent conductors such as copper, yet are made transparent by virtue of PCCE 10. This allows for a bright display that uses less power than displays that employ conventional transparent conductors whose lowest resistivity is about 10−4 Ohm-cm.
One possible issue in forming an array of transparent electrodes using PC transparent-conductor assemblies 100 relates to how close one can place the assemblies to each other without interfering with the cloaking effect provided by PCCEs 10. The proximity of conductors 110 also impacts the spatial uniformity of the applied field of the electrodes.
It should be noted that in the case of a pair of circularly symmetric PCCEs 10 as shown in
With continuing reference to
It should be noted that the frequency response of PCCE 10, in principle, cannot be perfect. In other words, it can provide cloaking at optical frequencies, but at lower frequencies, say for instance from DC to 10 GHz, the material response of the PCCE could render the cloak inoperable. This would enable the conductor to apply fields and potentials to the material outside the cloak and potentially modifying the optical characteristics of that material. Thus, while optical-wavelength fields will be completely uninfluenced (not dependent upon) of the physical presence of conductors 110, the conductors can still affect the optical fields.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made to the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Thus, it is intended that the present invention cover the modifications and variations of this invention provided they come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
This application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 (e) of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/008,328 filed on Dec. 19, 2007.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61008328 | Dec 2007 | US |