1. Field
This disclosure is generally related to solar cells. More specifically, this disclosure is related to a solar cell that includes a metal grid fabricated by an electroplating technique.
2. Related Art
The negative environmental impact caused by the use of fossil fuels and their rising cost have resulted in a dire need for cleaner, cheaper alternative energy sources. Among different forms of alternative energy sources, solar power has been favored for its cleanness and wide availability.
A solar cell converts light into electricity using the photovoltaic effect. There are several basic solar cell structures, including a single p-n junction solar cell, a p-i-n/n-i-p solar cell, and a multi-junction solar cell. A typical single p-n junction structure includes a p-type doped layer and an n-type doped layer. Solar cells with a single p-n junction can be homojunction solar cells or heterojunction solar cells. If both the p-doped and n-doped layers are made of similar materials (materials with equal bandgaps), the solar cell is called a homojunction solar cell. In contrast, a heterojunction solar cell includes at least two layers of materials of different bandgaps. A p-i-n/n-i-p structure includes a p-type doped layer, an n-type doped layer, and an intrinsic (undoped) semiconductor layer (the i-layer) sandwiched between the p-layer and the n-layer. A multi-junction structure includes multiple single-junction structures of different bandgaps stacked on top of one another.
In a solar cell, light is absorbed near the p-n junction, generating carriers. The carriers diffuse into the p-n junction and are separated by the built-in electric field, thus producing an electrical current across the device and external circuitry. An important metric in determining a solar cell's quality is its energy-conversion efficiency, which is defined as the ratio between power converted (from absorbed light to electrical energy) and power collected when the solar cell is connected to an electrical circuit.
In conventional c-Si based solar cells, the current is collected by front-side Ag grid 102. To form Ag grid 102, conventional methods involve printing Ag paste (which often includes Ag particle, organic binder, and glass frit) onto the wafers and then firing the Ag paste at a temperature between 700° C. and 800° C. The high-temperature firing of the Ag paste ensures good contact between Ag and Si, and lowers the resistivity of the Ag lines. The resistivity of the fired Ag paste is typically between 5×10−6 and 8×10−6 ohm-cm, which is much higher than the resistivity of bulk silver.
In addition to the high series resistance, the electrode grid obtained by screen-printing Ag paste also has other disadvantages, including higher material cost, wider line width, and limited line height. As the price of silver rises, the material cost of the silver electrode has exceeded half of the processing cost for manufacturing solar cells. With the state-of-the-art printing technology, the Ag lines typically have a line width between 100 and 120 microns, and it is difficult to reduce the line width further. Although inkjet printing can result in narrower lines, inkjet printing suffers other problems, such as low productivity. The height of the Ag lines is also limited by the printing method. One print can produce Ag lines with a height that is less than 25 microns. Although multiple printing can produce lines with increased height, it also increases line width, which is undesirable for high-efficiency solar cells. Similarly, electroplating of Ag or Cu onto the printed Ag lines can increase line height at the expense of increased line width. In addition, the resistance of such Ag lines is still too high to meet the requirement of high-efficiency solar cells.
Another solution is to electroplate a Ni/Cu/Sn metal stack directly on the Si emitter. This method can produce a metal grid with lower resistance (the resistivity of plated Cu is typically between 2×10−6 and 3×10−6 ohm-cm). However, the adhesion of Ni to Si is less than ideal, and stress from the metal stack may result in peeling of the whole metal lines.
One embodiment of the present invention provides a solar cell. The solar cell includes a photovoltaic structure and a front-side metal grid situated above the photovoltaic structure. The front-side metal grid also includes one or more electroplated metal layers. The front-side metal grid also includes one or more finger lines, and each end of a respective finger line is coupled to a corresponding end of an adjacent finger line via an additional metal line, thus ensuring that the respective finger line has no open end.
In a variation on the embodiment, the additional metal line is located near an edge of the solar cell and has a width that is larger than a width of the respective finger line.
In a variation on the embodiment, an intersection between the additional metal line and the respective finger line is rounded or chamfered.
In a variation on the embodiment, the metal grid further includes a metal adhesive layer situated between the electroplated metal layer and the photovoltaic structure. The metal adhesive layer further comprises one or more of: Cu, Al, Co, W, Cr, Mo, Ni, Ti, Ta, titanium nitride (TiNx), titanium tungsten (TiWx), titanium silicide (TiSix), titanium silicon nitride (TiSiN), tantalum nitride (TaNx), tantalum silicon nitride (TaSiNx), nickel vanadium (NiV), tungsten nitride (WNx), and their combinations.
In a further variation, the photovoltaic structure comprises a transparent conducting oxide (TCO) layer, and the metal adhesive layer is in direct contact with the TCO layer.
In a variation on the embodiment, the electroplated metal layers include one or more of: a Cu layer, an Ag layer, and a Sn layer.
In a variation on the embodiment, the metal grid further includes a metal seed layer situated between the electroplated metal layer and photovoltaic structure.
In a further variation, the metal seed layer is formed using a physical vapor deposition (PVD) technique, including one of: evaporation and sputtering deposition.
In a variation on the embodiment, a predetermined edge portion of the respective finger line has a width that is larger than a width of a center portion of the respective finger line.
In a variation on the embodiment, the photovoltaic structure includes a base layer, and an emitter layer situated above the base layer. The emitter layer includes at least one of: regions diffused with dopants located within the base layer, a poly silicon layer diffused with dopants situated above the base layer, and a doped amorphous silicon (a-Si) layer situated above the base layer.
In a further variation, the dopants include one of: phosphorus and boron.
In the figures, like reference numerals refer to the same figure elements.
The following description is presented to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the embodiments, and is provided in the context of a particular application and its requirements. Various modifications to the disclosed embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. Thus, the present invention is not limited to the embodiments shown, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features disclosed herein.
Overview
Embodiments of the present invention provide a solution to avoid metal peeling in a solar cell that includes an electroplated metal grid. The solar cell includes a crystalline-Si (c-Si) substrate, an emitter layer, a passivation layer, a metal-adhesion layer, and front- and back-side electrode metal grids. The metal-adhesion layer is formed using a physical vapor deposition (PVD) technique, such as sputtering or evaporation. The front-side metal grid is formed by selectively electroplating a metal stack, which can be a single-layer or a multi-layer structure, on the metal-adhesion layer. To mitigate the stress that can lead to the peeling of the metal lines, the grid pattern is specially designed to ensure that no open end or discontinuous point exists. The back-side electrode metal grid can be formed using a same method that is used to form the front-side electrode metal grid. Additionally, it is possible to form the back-side electrode by screen-printing, electroplating, or aerosol-jet printing of a metal grid.
Electroplated Metal Grid
Electroplated metal grids used as solar cell electrodes have shown lower resistance than printed Al grids. However, adhesion between the electroplated metal lines and the underlying transparent conducting oxide (TCO) layers or semiconductor layers can be an issue. Even with the introduction of an adhesion layer, as the thickness of the electroplated metal lines increases (to ensure lower resistance), metal line peeling can still occur when the stress is to o high. The peeling of metal lines can be a result of stress buildup at the interface between the electroplated metal and the underlying structures (which can be the TCO layer or the semiconductor structure). The difference in thermal expansion coefficients between the metal and the silicon substrate and the thermal cycling of the environment where the solar cells are situated often lead to such stress. If the amount of the stress exceeds the adhesion strength provided by the adhesion layer, the bonding between the metal and the underlying layers will break.
When designing solar cells, to reduce losses due to emitter resistance and shading, it is desirable to design a high metal height-to-width aspect ratio. However, the height-to-width aspect ratio of the finger lines is often limited by the fabrication technology used for forming the metal grid. Conventional printing technologies, such as screen-printing, often result in metal lines with relatively low height-to-width aspect ratio. Electroplating technologies can produce metal lines with higher height-to-width aspect ratio. However, electroplated metal lines may experience peeling when placed in an environment with changing temperatures. As previously discussed, the difference in thermal expansion coefficients between the metal and the silicon substrate, and the changing temperature can lead to stress buildup and the eventual breaking of the adhesion between the metal and the underlying layers. Even though the breaking may happen at a single location, the good malleability of the plated metal, such as plated Cu, can lead to peeling of the entire metal line.
Note that the amount of stress is related to the height-to-width aspect ratio of the metal lines; the larger the aspect ratio, the larger the stress. Hence, assuming the metal lines have uniform width (which can be well controlled during fabrication), the thicker portion of the line will experience greater stress. For electroplated metal grid, due to the current crowding effect occurring at the edge of the wafer, metals deposited at the wafer edge tend to be thicker than metals deposited at the center of the wafer. In the example shown in
To make matters worse, in addition to thermal stress, additional handling of the devices during fabrication of the solar module, such as storing, tabbing, and stringing, can also lead to peeling of the metal grid. For example, while the solar cells are being handled by machines or people, it is possible that finger lines may be pushed from side to side by other objects, such as edges of different wafers or metal lines on a wafer stacked above. Coincidentally, the end portions of the finger strips are often the weakest point in terms of resisting external forces. As one can see in
Hence, to prevent the peeling of the metal lines, it is important to strengthen the bond between the end portions of the finger strip and the underlying layers. Based on the previous analysis, to strengthen the bond between the metal at the line end and the underlying layers, one can reduce the height of the end portions to make it the same as the rest of the portions of the line. One way to do so is to increase the width of the line at the end region. The increased line width means that the collected current is now spread over a larger area, hence mitigating the current crowding at the line end. However, to avoid shading loss, the increase in line width has to be small, and the overall effect is limited. In addition, this still cannot prevent end peeling caused by external forces.
Embodiments of the present invention provide a solution that makes the finger strips more resistant to peeling by redesigning the grid pattern.
Note that two goals can be simultaneously achieved by adding short lines that bridge two adjacent finger strips. The first goal is to divert current at the wafer edge during electroplating, thus reducing the thickness of the metal deposited at the ends of the finger strips. Compared with the example shown in
The second goal achieved by the additional short lines is to eliminate the existence of open ends. By bridging an open end point on one finger strip to an end point on an adjacent finger strip, the original discontinued finger strips become continuous lines without any open ends. Note that, as discussed previously, open or discontinued ends may break off when external forces are applied due to lack of structural support. In contrast, in the example shown in
By simultaneously increasing thickness uniformity and eliminating open ends, embodiments of the present invention effectively reduce the possibility of peeling of the finger strips. In addition to the example shown in
Note that, although the additional lines at the wafer edge may increase shading, such an effect can be negligible in most cases. For example, in
In the examples shown in
The detailed view shown in region 402 illustrates that arcs are used to connect two perpendicular metal lines, one being the horizontal finger strip, and the other the vertical short line that bridges two adjacent fingers. This results in a rounded corner. In one embodiment, the radius of the arc can be between 0.05 mm and one-half of the finger spacing. Note that the finger spacing can be between 2 and 3 mm. The detailed view shown in region 404 illustrates that chamfers are created at the turning corners to eliminate the right angle formed by the two perpendicular metal lines.
In one embodiment, the metal lines at the wafer edge, such as the short lines (including the rounded or chamfered sections) that connect the two adjacent finger strips, are slightly widened in order to further reduce current density at those locations. As a result, during electroplating, the thickness of metal deposited at those edge locations is reduced, and the increased contact area also ensures better adhesion between the electroplated metal and the underlying layers. In
In operation 5A, a substrate 500 is prepared. In one embodiment, substrate 500 can be a crystalline-Si (c-Si) wafer. In a further embodiment, preparing c-Si substrate 500 includes standard saw damage etch (which removes the damaged outer layer of Si) and surface texturing. The c-Si substrate 500 can be lightly doped with either n-type or p-type dopants. In one embodiment, c-Si substrate 500 is lightly doped with p-type dopants. Note that in addition to c-Si, other materials (such as metallurgical-Si) can also be used to form substrate 500.
In operation 5B, a doped emitter layer 502 is formed on top of c-Si substrate 500. Depending on the doping type of c-Si substrate 500, emitter layer 502 can be either n-type doped or p-type doped. In one embodiment, emitter layer 502 is doped with n-type dopant. In a further embodiment, emitter layer 502 is formed by diffusing phosphorous. Note that if phosphorus diffusion is used for forming emitter layer 502, phosphosilicate glass (PSG) etch and edge isolation is needed. Other methods are also possible to form emitter layer 502. For example, one can first form a poly Si layer on top of substrate 500, and then diffuse dopants into the poly Si layer. The dopants can include either phosphorus or boron. Moreover, emitter layer 502 can also be formed by depositing a doped amorphous Si (a-Si) layer on top of substrate 500.
In operation 5C, an anti-reflection layer 504 is formed on top of emitter layer 502. In one embodiment, anti-reflection layer 504 includes, but not limited to: silicon nitride (SiNx), silicon oxide (SiOx), titanium oxide (TiOx), aluminum oxide (Al2O3), and their combinations. In one embodiment, anti-reflection layer 504 includes a layer of a transparent conducting oxide (TCO) material, such as indium tin oxide (ITO), aluminum zinc oxide (AZO), gallium zinc oxide (GZO), tungsten doped indium oxide (IWO), and their combinations.
In operation 5D, back-side electrode 506 is formed on the back side of Si substrate 500. In one embodiment, forming back-side electrode 506 includes printing a full Al layer and subsequent alloying through firing. In one embodiment, forming back-side electrode 506 includes printing an Ag/Al grid and subsequent furnace firing.
In operation 5E, a number of contact windows, including windows 508 and 510, are formed in anti-reflection layer 504. In one embodiment, heavily doped regions, such as regions 512 and 514 are formed in emitter layer 502, directly beneath contact windows 508 and 510, respectively. In a further embodiment, contact windows 508 and 510 and heavily doped regions 512 and 514 are formed by spraying phosphorous on anti-reflection layer 504, followed by a laser-groove local-diffusion process. Note that operation 5E is optional, and is needed when anti-reflection layer 504 is electrically insulating. If anti-reflection layer 504 is electrically conducting (e.g., when anti-reflection layer 504 is formed using TCO materials), there is no need to form the contact windows.
In operation 5F, a metal adhesive layer 516 is formed on anti-reflection layer 504. In one embodiment, materials used to form adhesive layer 516 include, but are not limited to: Ti, titanium nitride (TiNx), titanium tungsten (TiWx), titanium silicide (TiSix), titanium silicon nitride (TiSiN), Ta, tantalum nitride (TaNx), tantalum silicon nitride (TaSiNx), nickel vanadium (NiV), tungsten nitride (WNx), Cu, Al, Co, W, Cr, Mo, Ni, and their combinations. In a further embodiment, metal adhesive layer 516 is formed using a physical vapor deposition (PVD) technique, such as sputtering or evaporation. The thickness of adhesive layer 516 can range from a few nanometers up to 100 nm. Note that Ti and its alloys tend to form very good adhesion with Si material, and they can form good ohmic contact with heavily doped regions 512 and 514. Forming metal adhesive layer 514 on top of anti-reflection layer 504 prior to the electroplating process ensures better adhesion to anti-reflection layer 504 of the subsequently formed layers.
In operation 5G, a metal seed layer 518 is formed on adhesive layer 516. Metal seed layer 518 can include Cu or Ag. The thickness of metal seed layer 518 can be between 5 nm and 500 nm. In one embodiment, metal seed layer 518 has a thickness of 100 nm. Like metal adhesive layer 516, metal seed layer 518 can be formed using a PVD technique. In one embodiment, the metal used to form metal seed layer 518 is the same metal that used to form the first layer of the electroplated metal. The metal seed layer provides better adhesion of the subsequently plated metal layer. For example, Cu plated on Cu often has better adhesion than Cu plated on to other materials.
In operation 5H, a patterned masking layer 520 is deposited on top of metal seed layer 518. The openings of masking layer 520, such as openings 522 and 524, correspond to the locations of contact windows 508 and 510, and thus are located above heavily doped regions 512 and 514. Note that openings 522 and 524 are slightly larger than contact windows 508 and 510. Masking layer 520 can include a patterned photoresist layer, which can be formed using a photolithography technique. In one embodiment, the photoresist layer is formed by screen-printing photoresist on top of the wafer. The photoresist is then baked to remove solvent. A mask is laid on the photoresist, and the wafer is exposed to UV light. After the UV exposure, the mask is removed, and the photoresist is developed in a photoresist developer. Openings 522 and 524 are formed after developing. The photoresist can also be applied by spraying, dip coating, or curtain coating. Dry film photoresist can also be used. Alternatively, masking layer 520 can include a layer of patterned silicon oxide (SiO2). In one embodiment, masking layer 520 is formed by first depositing a layer of SiO2 using a low-temperature plasma-enhanced chemical-vapor-deposition (PECVD) technique. In a further embodiment, masking layer 520 is formed by dip-coating the front surface of the wafer using silica slurry, followed by screen-printing an etchant that includes hydrofluoric acid or fluorides. Other masking materials are also possible, as long as the masking material is electrically insulating.
Note that masking layer 520 defines the pattern of the front metal grid because, during the subsequent electroplating, metal materials can only be deposited on regions above the openings, such as openings 522 and 524, defined by masking layer 520. To ensure better thickness uniformity and better adhesion, the pattern defined by masking layer 520 includes finger strips that are formed with continuous, non-broken lines. Exemplary patterns formed by masking layer 520 include patterns shown in
In operation 5J, one or more layers of metal are deposited at the openings of masking layer 520 to form a front-side metal grid 526. Front-side metal grid 526 can be formed using an electroplating technique, which can include electrodeposition, light-induced plating, and/or electroless deposition. In one embodiment, metal seed layer 518 and/or adhesive layer 516 are coupled to the cathode of the plating power supply, which can be a direct current (DC) power supply, via an electrode. Metal seed layer 518 and masking layer 520, which includes the openings, are submerged in an electrolyte solution which permits the flow of electricity. Note that, because masking layer 520 is electrically insulating, metals will be selectively deposited into the openings, thus forming a metal grid with a pattern corresponding to the one defined by those openings. Depending on the material forming metal seed layer 518, front-side metal grid 526 can be formed using Cu or Ag. For example, if metal seed layer 518 is formed using Cu, front-side metal grid 526 is also formed using Cu. In addition, front-side metal grid 526 can include a multilayer structure, such as a Cu/Sn bi-layer structure, or a Cu/Ag bi-layer structure. The Sn or Ag top layer is deposited to assist a subsequent soldering process. When depositing Cu, a Cu plate is used at the anode, and the solar cell is submerged in the electrolyte suitable for Cu plating. The current used for Cu plating is between 0.1 ampere and 2 amperes for a wafer with a dimension of 125 mm×125 mm, and the thickness of the Cu layer is approximately tens of microns. In one embodiment, the thickness of the electroplated metal layer is between 30 μm and 50 μm.
In operation 5K, masking layer 520 is removed.
In operation 5L, portions of adhesive layer 516 and metal seed layer 518 that are originally covered by masking layer 520 are etched away, leaving only the portions that are beneath front-side metal grid 526. In one embodiment, wet chemical etching process is used. Note that, because front-side metal grid 526 is much thicker (by several magnitudes) than adhesive layer 516 and metal seed layer 518, the etching has a negligible effect on front-side metal grid 526. In one embodiment, the thickness of the resulting metal grid can range from 30 μm to 50 μm. The width of the finger strips can be between 10 μm to 100 μm, and the width of the busbars can be between 0.5 to 2 mm. Moreover, the spacing between the finger strips can be between 2 mm and 3 mm.
During fabrication, after the formation of the metal adhesive layer and the seed metal layer, it is also possible to form a patterned masking layer that covers areas that correspond to the locations of contact windows and the heavily doped regions, and etch away portions of the metal adhesive layer and the metal seed layer that are not covered by the patterned masking layer. In one embodiment, the leftover portions of the metal adhesive layer and the metal seed layer form a pattern that is similar to the ones shown in
In the example shown in
The foregoing descriptions of various embodiments have been presented only for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the present invention to the forms disclosed. Accordingly, many modifications and variations will be apparent to practitioners skilled in the art. Additionally, the above disclosure is not intended to limit the present invention.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/709,798, entitled “PHOTOVOLTAIC DEVICES WITH COPPER GRIDS,” by inventors Jianming Fu, Chentao Yu, Jiunn Benjamin Heng, Christopher J. Beitel, and Zheng Xu, filed 4 Oct. 2012.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2626907 | Melvin De Groote | Jan 1953 | A |
2938938 | Dickson | May 1960 | A |
3094439 | Mann | Jun 1963 | A |
3116171 | Nielson | Dec 1963 | A |
3459597 | Baron | Aug 1969 | A |
3961997 | Chu | Jun 1976 | A |
3969163 | Wakefield | Jul 1976 | A |
4015280 | Matsushita | Mar 1977 | A |
4124410 | Kotval | Nov 1978 | A |
4124455 | Lindmayer | Nov 1978 | A |
4193975 | Kotval | Mar 1980 | A |
4200621 | Liaw | Apr 1980 | A |
4213798 | Williams | Jul 1980 | A |
4251285 | Yoldas | Feb 1981 | A |
4284490 | Weber | Aug 1981 | A |
4315096 | Tyan | Feb 1982 | A |
4336648 | Pschunder | Jun 1982 | A |
4342044 | Ovshinsky | Jul 1982 | A |
4431858 | Gonzalez | Feb 1984 | A |
4514579 | Hanak | Apr 1985 | A |
4540843 | Gochermann | Sep 1985 | A |
4567642 | Dilts | Feb 1986 | A |
4571448 | Barnett | Feb 1986 | A |
4577051 | Hartman | Mar 1986 | A |
4586988 | Nath | May 1986 | A |
4589191 | Green | May 1986 | A |
4612409 | Hamakawa | Sep 1986 | A |
4633033 | Nath | Dec 1986 | A |
4652693 | Bar-On | Mar 1987 | A |
4667060 | Spitzer | May 1987 | A |
4670096 | Schwirtlich | Jun 1987 | A |
4694115 | Lillington | Sep 1987 | A |
4771017 | Tobin | Sep 1988 | A |
4784702 | Henri | Nov 1988 | A |
4877460 | Flodl | Oct 1989 | A |
4933061 | Kulkarni | Jun 1990 | A |
5053355 | von Campe | Oct 1991 | A |
5075763 | Spitzer | Dec 1991 | A |
5084107 | Deguchi | Jan 1992 | A |
5118361 | Fraas | Jun 1992 | A |
5131933 | Floedl | Jul 1992 | A |
5178685 | Borenstein | Jan 1993 | A |
5181968 | Nath | Jan 1993 | A |
5213628 | Noguchi | May 1993 | A |
5217539 | Fraas | Jun 1993 | A |
5279682 | Wald | Jan 1994 | A |
5286306 | Menezes | Feb 1994 | A |
5364518 | Hartig | Nov 1994 | A |
5401331 | Ciszek | Mar 1995 | A |
5455430 | Noguchi | Oct 1995 | A |
5461002 | Safir | Oct 1995 | A |
5563092 | Ohmi | Oct 1996 | A |
5627081 | Tsuo | May 1997 | A |
5676766 | Probst | Oct 1997 | A |
5681402 | Ichinose | Oct 1997 | A |
5698451 | Hanoka | Dec 1997 | A |
5705828 | Noguchi | Jan 1998 | A |
5726065 | Szlufcik | Mar 1998 | A |
5808315 | Murakami | Sep 1998 | A |
5814195 | Lehan | Sep 1998 | A |
5903382 | Tench | May 1999 | A |
5935345 | Kuznicki | Aug 1999 | A |
6034322 | Pollard | Mar 2000 | A |
6091019 | Sakata | Jul 2000 | A |
6140570 | Kariya | Oct 2000 | A |
6232545 | Samaras | May 2001 | B1 |
6303853 | Fraas | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6333457 | Mulligan | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6441297 | Keller | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6488824 | Hollars | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6538193 | Fraas | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6552414 | Horzel | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6586270 | Tsuzuki | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6620645 | Chandra | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6683360 | Dierickx | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6736948 | Barrett | May 2004 | B2 |
6803513 | Beernink | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6841051 | Crowley | Jan 2005 | B2 |
7030413 | Nakamura | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7164150 | Terakawa | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7328534 | Dinwoodie | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7388146 | Fraas | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7399385 | German | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7534632 | Hu | May 2009 | B2 |
7635810 | Luch | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7737357 | Cousins | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7749883 | Meeus | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7769887 | Bhattacharyya | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7772484 | Li | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7777128 | Montello | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7825329 | Basol | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7829781 | Montello | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7829785 | Basol | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7872192 | Fraas | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7905995 | German | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7977220 | Sanjurjo | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8070925 | Hoffman | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8168880 | Jacobs | May 2012 | B2 |
8182662 | Crowley | May 2012 | B2 |
8209920 | Krause | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8222513 | Luch | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8222516 | Cousins | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8343795 | Luo | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8586857 | Everson | Nov 2013 | B2 |
20010008143 | Sasaoka | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020072207 | Andoh | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020086456 | Cunningham | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020176404 | Girard | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020189939 | German | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030000571 | Wakuda | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030034062 | Stern | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030042516 | Forbes | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030070705 | Hayden | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030097447 | Johnston | May 2003 | A1 |
20030168578 | Taguchi | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030183270 | Falk | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030201007 | Fraas | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040065363 | Fetzer | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040103937 | Bilyalov | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040112426 | Hagino | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040123897 | Ojima | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040135979 | Hazelton | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040152326 | Inomata | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050012095 | Niira | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050022861 | Rose | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050061665 | Pavani | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050064247 | Sane | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050074954 | Yamanaka | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050109388 | Murakami | May 2005 | A1 |
20050133084 | Joge | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050178662 | Wurczinger | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050189015 | Rohatgi | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050199279 | Yoshimine | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050252544 | Rohatgi | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050257823 | Zwanenburg | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060012000 | Estes | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060060238 | Hacke | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060060791 | Hazelton | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060130891 | Carlson | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060154389 | Doan | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060213548 | Bachrach | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060231803 | Wang | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060255340 | Manivannan | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060283496 | Okamoto | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060283499 | Terakawa | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070023081 | Johnson | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070023082 | Manivannan | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070108437 | Tavkhelidze | May 2007 | A1 |
20070110975 | Schneweis | May 2007 | A1 |
20070132034 | Curello | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070137699 | Manivannan | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070148336 | Bachrach | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070186968 | Nakauchi | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070186970 | Takahashi | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070202029 | Burns | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070235829 | Levine | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070256728 | Cousins | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070274504 | Maes | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070283996 | Hachtmann | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070283997 | Hachtmann | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080041437 | Yamaguchi | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080047602 | Krasnov | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080047604 | Korevaar | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080053519 | Pearce | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080061293 | Ribeyron | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080092947 | Lopatin | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080121272 | Besser | May 2008 | A1 |
20080121276 | Lopatin | May 2008 | A1 |
20080121932 | Ranade | May 2008 | A1 |
20080149161 | Nishida | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080156370 | Abdallah | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080173350 | Choi | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080196757 | Yoshimine | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080202577 | Hieslmair | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080202582 | Noda | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080216891 | Harkness | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080230122 | Terakawa | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080251117 | Schubert | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080264477 | Moslehi | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080276983 | Drake | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080283115 | Fukawa | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080302030 | Stancel | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080303503 | Wolfs | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080308145 | Krasnov | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090007965 | Rohatgi | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090056805 | Barnett | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090078318 | Meyers | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090084439 | Lu | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090101872 | Young | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090139512 | Lima | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090151783 | Lu | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090155028 | Boguslavskiy | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090188561 | Aiken | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090221111 | Frolov | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090229854 | Fredenberg | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090239331 | Xu | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090250108 | Zhou | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090255574 | Yu | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090283138 | Lin | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090283145 | Kim | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090293948 | Tucci | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090317934 | Scherff | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090320897 | Shimomura | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100006145 | Lee | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100015756 | Weidman | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100043863 | Wudu | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100065111 | Fu | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100068890 | Stockum | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100108134 | Ravi | May 2010 | A1 |
20100116325 | Nikoonahad | May 2010 | A1 |
20100124619 | Xu | May 2010 | A1 |
20100132774 | Borden | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100132792 | Kim | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100147364 | Gonzalez | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100169478 | Saha | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100186802 | Borden | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100193014 | Johnson | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100218799 | Stefani | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100224230 | Luch | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100269904 | Cousins | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100279492 | Yang | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100300506 | Heng et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100300507 | Heng | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100313877 | Bellman | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110146781 | Laudisio | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110156188 | Tu | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110168250 | Lin | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110245957 | Porthouse | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110259419 | Hagemann | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110272012 | Heng et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110277688 | Trujillo | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110277825 | Fu et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110297224 | Miyamoto | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110297227 | Pysch | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120000502 | Wiedeman | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120012174 | Wu | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120028461 | Ritchie | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120031480 | Tisler | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120040487 | Asthana | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120073975 | Ganti | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120085384 | Beitel | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120125391 | Pinarbasi | May 2012 | A1 |
20120152349 | Cao | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120192932 | Wu et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120240995 | Coakley | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120248497 | Zhou | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120279443 | Kornmeyer | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120279548 | Munch | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120285517 | Souza | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120305060 | Fu et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120318319 | Pinarbasi | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120318340 | Heng et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120325282 | Snow | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130000705 | Shappir | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130014802 | Zimmerman | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130096710 | Pinarbasi | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130152996 | DeGroot | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130206213 | He | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130206221 | Gannon | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130247955 | Baba | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130269771 | Cheun | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140124013 | Morad | May 2014 | A1 |
20140124014 | Morad | May 2014 | A1 |
20140154836 | Kim | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140196768 | Heng | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140345674 | Yang | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150349145 | Morad | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150349153 | Morad | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150349161 | Morad | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150349162 | Morad | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150349167 | Morad | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150349168 | Morad | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150349169 | Morad | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150349170 | Morad | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150349171 | Morad | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150349172 | Morad | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150349173 | Morad | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150349174 | Morad | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150349175 | Morad | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150349176 | Morad | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150349190 | Morad | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150349193 | Morad | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150349701 | Morad | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150349702 | Morad | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150349703 | Morad | Dec 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
100580957 | Jan 2010 | CN |
104409402 | Mar 2015 | CN |
4030713 | Apr 1992 | DE |
102012010151 | Nov 2013 | DE |
1770791 | Apr 2007 | EP |
1806684 | Aug 2007 | EP |
2362430 | Aug 2011 | EP |
2385561 | Nov 2011 | EP |
2479796 | Jul 2012 | EP |
2626907 | Aug 2013 | EP |
2479796 | Jul 2015 | EP |
2626907 | Aug 2015 | EP |
H04245683 | Sep 1992 | JP |
H07249788 | Sep 1995 | JP |
2002057357 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2005159312 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2009177225 | Aug 2009 | JP |
20050122721 | Dec 2005 | KR |
20060003277 | Jan 2006 | KR |
20090011519 | Feb 2009 | KR |
9117839 | Nov 1991 | WO |
9120097 | Dec 1991 | WO |
03083953 | Oct 2003 | WO |
2006097189 | Sep 2006 | WO |
2008089657 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2009150654 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2009150654 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2010075606 | Jul 2010 | WO |
2010104726 | Sep 2010 | WO |
2010123974 | Oct 2010 | WO |
2011005447 | Jan 2011 | WO |
2011005447 | Jan 2011 | WO |
2011008881 | Jan 2011 | WO |
2011008881 | Jan 2011 | WO |
2011053006 | May 2011 | WO |
2011123646 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2013020590 | Feb 2013 | WO |
2010085949 | Mar 2013 | WO |
2014074826 | Jul 2014 | WO |
2014110520 | Jul 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Beaucarne G et al: ‘Epitaxial thin-film Si solar cells’ Thin Solid Films, Elsevier-Sequoia S.A. Lausanne, CH LNKD—DO1:10.1016/J.TSF.2005.12.003, vol. 511-512, Jul. 26, 2006, pp. 533-542, XP025007243 ISSN: 0040-6090 [retrieved on Jul. 26, 2006]. |
Chabal, Yves J. et al., ‘Silicon Surface and Interface Issues for Nanoelectronics,’ The Electrochemical Society Interface, Spring 2005, pp. 31-33. |
Collins English Dictionary (Convex. (2000). In Collins English Dictionary. http://search.credoreference.com/content/entry/hcengdict/convex/0 on Oct. 18, 2014). |
Cui, ‘Chapter 7 Dopant diffusion’, publically available as early as Nov. 4, 2010 at <https://web.archive.org/web/20101104143332/http://ece.uwaterloo.ca/˜bcui/content/NE/%20343/Chapter/%207%20Dopant%20 diffusion%20—%20l.pptx> and converted to PDF. |
Davies, P.C.W., ‘Quantum tunneling time,’ Am. J. Phys. 73, Jan. 2005, pp. 23-27. |
Dosaj V D et al: ‘Single Crystal Silicon Ingot Pulled From Chemically-Upgraded Metallurgical-Grade Silicon’ Conference Record of the IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, May 6, 1975, pp. 275-279, XP001050345. |
Green, Martin A. et al., ‘High-Efficiency Silicon Solar Cells,’ IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. ED-31, No. 5, May 1984, pp. 679-683. |
Hamm, Gary, Wei, Lingyum, Jacques, Dave, Development of a Plated Nickel Seed Layer for Front Side Metallization of Silicon Solar Cells, EU PVSEC Proceedings, Presented Sep. 2009. |
JCS Pires, J Otubo, AFB Braga, PR Mei; The purification of metallurgical grade silicon by electron beam melting, J of Mats Process Tech 169 (2005) 16-20. |
Khattak, C. P. et al., “Refining Molten Metallurgical Grade Silicon for use as Feedstock for Photovoltaic Applications”, 16th E.C. Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, May 1-5, 2000, pp. 1282-1283. |
Merriam-Webster online dictionary—“mesh”. (accessed Oct. 8, 2012). |
Mueller, Thomas, et al. “Application of wide-band gap hydrogenated amorphous silicon oxide layers to heterojunction solar cells for high quality passivation.” Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2008. PVSC'08. 33rd IEEE. IEEE, 2008. |
Mueller, Thomas, et al. “High quality passivation for heteroj unction solar cells by hydrogenated amorphous silicon suboxide films.” Applied Physics Letters 92.3 (2008): 033504-033504. |
Munzer, K.A. “High Throughput Industrial In-Line Boron BSF Diffusion” Jun. 2005. 20th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, pp. 777-780. |
National Weather Service Weather Forecast Office (“Why Do We have Seasons?” http://www.crh.noaa.gov/lmk/?n=seasons Accessed Oct. 18, 2014). |
O'Mara, W.C.; Herring, R.B.; Hunt L.P. (1990). Handbook of Semiconductor Silicon Technology. William Andrew Publishing/Noyes. pp. 275-293. |
Roedern, B. von, et al., ‘Why is the Open-Circuit Voltage of Crystalline Si Solar Cells so Critically Dependent on Emitter-and Base-Doping?’ Presented at the 9th Workshop on Crystalline Silicon Solar Cell Materials and Processes, Breckenridge, CO, Aug. 9-11, 1999. |
Stangl et al., Amorphous/Crystalline Silicon heterojunction solar cells—a simulation study; 17th European Photovoltaic Conference, Munich, Oct. 2001. |
Warabisako T et al: ‘Efficient Solar Cells From Metallurgical-Grade Silicon’ Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Japan Society of Applied Physics, JP, vol. 19, No. SUPPL. 19-01, Jan. 1, 1980, pp. 539-544, XP008036363 ISSN: 0021-4922. |
WP Leroy et al., “In Search for the Limits of Rotating Cylindrical Magnetron Sputtering”, Magnetron, ION Processing and ARC Technologies European Conference, Jun. 18, 2010, pp. 1-32. |
Yao Wen-Jie et al: ‘Interdisciplinary Physics and Related Areas of Science and Technology;The p recombination layer in tunnel junctions for micromorph tandem solar cells’, Chinese Physics B, Chinese Physics B, Bristol GB, vol. 20, No. 7, Jul. 26, 2011, p. 78402, XP020207379, ISSN: 1674-1056, DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/20/7/078402. |
Parthavi, “Doping by Diffusion and Implantation”, <http://www.leb.eei.uni-erlangen.de/winterakademie/2010/report/course03/pdf/0306.pdf>. |
Weiss, “Development of different copper seed layers with respect to the copper electroplating process,” Microelectronic Engineering 50 (2000) 443-440, Mar. 15, 2000. |
Tomasi, “Back-contacted Silicon Heterojunction Solar Cells With Efficiency>21%” 2014 IEEE. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140096823 A1 | Apr 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61709798 | Oct 2012 | US |