This application claims the priority benefit of Taiwan application serial no. 100127210, filed on Aug. 1, 2011. The entirety of the above-mentioned patent application is hereby incorporated by reference herein and made a part of this specification.
The technical field relates to photovoltaic module (solar module) with serially connected solar cells.
A photovoltaic module (solar module) package structure typically includes a glass plate, an encapsulant, a solar cell, an encapsulant, and a back sheet. Recently, a transparent photovoltaic module package structure, which includes a glass plate, an encapsulant, a solar cell, an encapsulant, and a glass plate, is also provided. Although these photovoltaic module package structures offer high strength properties, they often suffer from light losses and their power outputs become considerably lowered.
Various approaches, with the intention of decreasing light losses and improving the light trapping efficiency, are pursued through the adjustments on the structural designs of the high light transparency component or the back sheet. For example, provide a saw-teeth structure facing the cell intervals of the solar cell array in the photovoltaic apparatus, or a high light reflective back sheet with a grooved surface.
These approaches mainly focus on the choices of package materials and the improvement of fabrication techniques, and thus these approaches are time-consuming and complicated.
The photovoltaic module includes a string of serially connected solar cells. A direction perpendicular to an extension direction of the string of serially connected solar cells is defined as an x-direction, wherein an interval between the solar cells in the x direction ranges from 4 mm to 6 mm.
A photovoltaic module is further introduced. The photovoltaic module includes a string of serially connected solar cells, and a ratio of an interval area at a periphery of a single solar cell to an area of the single solar cell is between 0.058 to 0.125.
Several exemplary embodiments accompanied with figures are described in detail below to further describe the disclosure in details.
The accompanying drawings are included to provide further understanding, and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification. The drawings illustrate exemplary embodiments and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the disclosure.
Reference now is made to the accompanying drawings to describe the exemplary embodiments and examples of the disclosure. Although the disclosure herein refers to certain illustrated embodiments, it is to be understood that these embodiments are presented by way of example and not by way of limitation. Moreover, the drawings are strictly provided for an illustration purpose, and therefore are drawn generally not with a representation in scale.
Referring to
Referring to
The material of the surface layer 200 includes glass, polytetrafluoro ethylene (ETFE), polyvinyl fluorite (PVF), or acrylic. The surface layer 200 may include a textured structure.
The material of the back layer 204 includes, but not limited to, glass, ETFE, PVF, or acrylic. The back layer 204 may be a multilayer reflective back layer having a light scattering multilayer surface; for example, a structure is PVDF/PET/PVDF, PA/PA/PA, PVF/PET/PVF, F/PET/PA, PVF/PET/EVA, etc. In view of light-trapping enhancement, because the light scattering multilayer surface possesses zero-depth concentrator effect, this type of material is appropriate as back layer 204. The optical effect thereof is shown in
The encapsulant 202 is, for example, a stacked structure. The encapsulant 202 may be selected from at least one of ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA), polyvinylbutyral (PVB), ETFE, and silicone in the exemplary embodiment.
The results of several experiments for supporting the effectiveness of the photovoltaic module in the above exemplary embodiments are presented here-below.
Five different reflective back layer materials are prepared. These materials, having multi layers of light scattering surface, include A: Krempel AKASOL PVL 1000V (the structure is PVDF/PET/PVDF), B: Isovolta 3554 (the structure is PA/PA/PA), C: Isovolta 2442 (the structure is PVF/PET/PVF), D: Isovolta 3572 (the structure is F/PET/PA), E: Madico TPE (the structure is PVF/PET/EVA).
Thereafter, using 5 different back layers with glass plates, EVA, and a 2×2 array of solar cells, 5 groups of photovoltaic modules are respectively formed, as shown in
Each group of photovoltaic modules includes a cell interval d2 of 2 mm in the y-direction and a distance H of 0.4 mm between the solar cell and the back layer. However, there are 5 different cell intervals d1 in the x-direction: 2 mm, 4 mm, 5 mm, 6 mm, and 10 mm.
Glass plates, EVA, and four solar cells are used to fabricate a group of photovoltaic modules as shown in
This group of photovoltaic modules has a cell interval d2 of 2 mm in the y-direction and a distance H of 0.4 mm between the solar cell and the back layer. Similar to Experiment 1, there are 5 different cell intervals d1 in the x-direction: 2 mm, 4 mm, 5 mm, 6 mm, and 10 mm.
Back layers, in which the material thereof is B: Isovolta 3554 (the structure is PA/PA/PA), glass plates, EVA, and four solar cells are used to fabricate a group of photovoltaic modules as shown in
This group of photovoltaic modules includes a cell interval d1 of 4 mm in the x-direction and a distance H of 0.4 mm between the solar cell and the back layer. However, there are 5 different cell intervals d2 in the y-direction: 2 mm, 4 mm, 5 mm, 6 mm, and 10 mm.
Except for replacing the back layer with a glass plate, other components, the interval d1 in the x-direction, the interval d2 in the y direction, and the distance H between the back layer and solar cell are similar to those in Experiment 2.
A photovoltaic module is formed with a back layer that constituted with a material of B: Isovolta 3554 (the structure is PA/PA/PA). The structure of the resulting photovoltaic module includes glass plate (thickness of 3.2 mm)/EVA (thickness of 0.4 mm)/solar cell (thickness of 0.2 mm)/EVA (thickness of 0.4 mm)/back layer (thickness of 0.2 mm). The solar cell array is a 6×10 array, and the module is packaged using a single crystalline cell with a conversion efficiency of 18%.
This group of photovoltaic modules includes an interval d2 of 4 mm in the y-direction and a distance H of 0.4 mm between the solar cell and the back layer. There are 5 different intervals d1 in the x-direction: 2 mm, 4 mm, 5 mm, 6 mm, and 10 mm.
Except for replacing the glass surface plate with ETFE and using Scotchshield™ Films from 3M™ for the back layer, other components, the interval d1 in the x-direction, the interval d2 in the y direction, and the distance H between the back layer and solar cell are similar to those in Comparative Experiment 2.
Except for changing the cell interval d1 in the x-direction to 5 mm and using the material B: Isovolta 3554 (the structure is PA/PA/PA) for the back layer, other components, the cell interval d2 in the y direction, and the distance H between the back layer and solar cell are similar to those in Comparative Experiment 2.
Test Result 1
The power outputs of the photovoltaic modules of Experiment 1 and the power outputs of the photovoltaic modules of the Comparative Experiment 1 are estimated by using the A class photovoltaic module flash simulator at standard test conditions (STC). The ratio of the change of the output powers to reference output power is: (power output of Experiment 1−power output of Comparative Experiment 1)/power output of Comparative Experiment 1, and the results are shown in
As shown in
Test Result 2
The power output of the photovoltaic modules of Experiment 2 and the power output of the photovoltaic modules of the Comparative Experiment 2 are estimated by using the A class photovoltaic module flash simulator at STC. The ratio of the change of the output powers to reference output power is: (power output of Experiment 2−power output of Comparative Experiment 2)/power output of Comparative Experiment 2, and the results are shown in
As shown in
Test Result 3
The power output of the photovoltaic modules of Experiment 3 are estimated by using the A class photovoltaic module flash simulator at STC. Comparing the conventional technique, in which the cell interval d1 in the x-direction is 2 mm, with the designs of the exemplary embodiments, in which the cell interval d1 in the x-direction is 4 mm, the power outputs are respectively 273.77 Wp (d1=2 mm) and 246.63 Wp (d1=4 mm). The details of the test results are summarized in Table 1 below.
The increase of the module efficiency by 1.1% can be calculated from the light trapping efficiency of the cell intervals in Table 1.
Test Results 4
The power output of the photovoltaic modules of Experiment 4 and the power output of the photovoltaic modules of the Comparative Experiment 2 are rated using the A class photovoltaic module flash simulator at STC. The ratio of the change of the output powers to reference output power is: (power output of Experiment 4−power output of Comparative Experiment 2)/power output of Comparative Experiment 2, and the results are shown in
According to the results as shown in
Test Results 5
The power output of the photovoltaic modules of Experiment 5 and the power output of the photovoltaic modules of the Comparative Experiment 2 are rated using the A class photovoltaic module flash simulator at STC. The ratio of the change of the output powers to reference output power is: (power output of Experiment 5−power output of Comparative Experiment 2)/power output of Comparative Experiment 2, and the results are shown in
According to
When the designs of the commercially available 6 inch (6″) single crystalline and multicrystalline photovoltaic modules are used, the area of the 6″ single crystalline cell is about 239 cm2, while the area of the 6″ multicrystalline cell is about 243.36 cm2. When a cell interval d1 is 4 mm in the x-direction and a cell intervals d2 in the y-direction is 2 mm, the margin area of the 6″ single crystalline cell is about 23.4 cm2, and the margin area of the 6″ multicrystalline cell is about 19.04 cm2, and consequentially the ratios of the margin areas of the cells to the areas of the cells are calculated and summarized in Table 2 below.
Similarly, when the designs of the commercially available 6 inch (6″) single crystalline and multicrystalline photovoltaic modules are used, the interval d1 in the x-direction is changed to 6 mm and other conditions remain the same, the ratios of the margin areas of the cells to the areas of the cells are calculated and summarized in Table 2 below.
When an 8 inch (8″) multicrystalline photovoltaic module is used, the area of the 8″ multicrystalline cell is about 20.8×20.8 cm2 while the area of the 8″ single crystalline cell is about 432.64 cm2. When the interval d2 in the y-direction is 2 mm and the interval d1 in the x-direction are changed to 4 mm and 6 mm, respectively, the ratios of the margin areas of the cells to the areas of the cells are calculated and summarized in Table 2 below.
Based on the results shown in Table 2, when d1 is in the range of 4 mm to 6 mm, in the application of existing 6 inch solar cell or developing 8 inch solar cell, it may be designed within the range of (margin area of single solar cell)/(area of single solar cell) being equal to 0.058 to 0.125.
According to the above exemplary embodiments, by controlling the interval area of the solar cells, full reflection path can be met in the light guiding design to accomplish light trapping. Further the photovoltaic module is designed with a back layer material possessing the zero-depth concentrator effect, the power output of the photovoltaic module is increased. Moreover, if the photovoltaic module is designed with a textured surface layer, the light diffraction effect is enhanced, which further improves the power output of the module.
Based on the above disclosure, if the light tracing method in the photovoltaic module is applied, full reflection path can be met in the light guiding design if the interval between two solar cells are designed according to the exemplary embodiments of the disclosure. Further, the fabrication method is easy and the power output of the module is enhanced.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made to the structure of the present disclosure without departing from the scope or spirit of the disclosure. In view of the foregoing, it is intended that the present disclosure cover modifications and variations of this disclosure provided they fall within the scope of the following claims and their equivalents.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
100127210 | Aug 2011 | TW | national |